mvp-comment-63-1
Electra invokes, (1) the house of Hades and his bride Persephone, in which the spirit of Agamemnon now dwells; (2) Hermes, who, as
ψυχοπομπός
, conducted him thither,—and who will also guide the avengers on their way (1395 f.); (3)
Ἀρά
, the imprecation uttered by the victim upon his murderers,—the personified curse, here conceived as a supernatural power (
πότνια
), which calls the Erinyes into action; and (4) the Erinyes themselves.
mvp-comment-63-2
Ἀΐδου
1
mvp-comment-64-1
ὦ χθόνἰ Ἑρμῆ
2
mvp-comment-64-2
Ἀρά
3
mvp-comment-64-3
πότνια
4
mvp-comment-65-1
σεμναὶ
5
mvp-comment-65-2
θεῶν παῖδες
6
mvp-comment-66-1
ὁρᾶθ’
7
mvp-comment-67-1
αἳ τοὺς εὐνὰς ὑποκλεπτομένους
8
mvp-comment-67-2
These much-impugned words appear genuine. The murder has been prompted by the guilty love:
δόλος ἦν ὁ φράσας, ἔρος ὁ κτείνας
(197). In Electra's thought, they are inseparable. The allusion to the love
follows the reference to the murder, because she regards it as the crowning outrage (271
τὴν τελευταίαν ὕβριν
) that Clytaemnestra still lives with Aegisthus. Bloodshed was not the only sin which the Erinyes punished. They were the embodied sanctions of natural law, and every crime against the family came within their cognisance. (See
Introd. to Homer, p. 51, § 13.) Indeed, Electra herself speaks of the unhallowed union as a special provocation to those Avengers: 275 f.
ἡ δ’ ὧδε τλήμων ὥστε τῷ μιάστορι
|
ξύνεστ’, Ἐρινὺν οὔτιν’ ἐκφοβουμένη
.
mvp-comment-68-1
τείσασθε
9
mvp-comment-69-1
ἡμετέρου
10
μοι
11
mvp-comment-69-2
καί μοι
12
mvp-comment-70-1
ἄγειν
13
mvp-comment-70-2
σωκῶ
14
mvp-comment-71-1
δυστανοτάτας
15
mvp-comment-72-1
τάκεις … οἰμωγὰν
16
mvp-comment-72-2
ἀκόρεστον
17
mvp-comment-72-3
τὸν πάλαι
18
mvp-comment-72-4
πάλαι
19
ἐκ
20
mvp-comment-72-5
ἀθεώτατα
21
mvp-comment-72-6
κακᾷ … χειρὶ πρόδοτον
22
χειρὶ
23
mvp-comment-72-7
ὡς
24
mvp-comment-72-8
ὁ τάδε πορὼν
25
mvp-comment-72-9
εἴ μοι θέμις
26
mvp-comment-73-1
γενέθλα
27
mvp-comment-73-2
γενναίων
28
mvp-comment-73-3
παραμύθ‐
29
ιον
30
mvp-comment-74-1
ξυνίημι
31
mvp-comment-74-2
τάδ’
32
mvp-comment-75-1
φυγγάνει
33
mvp-comment-75-2
οὐδ’ ἐθέλω
34
mvp-comment-76-1
μὴ οὐ
35
mvp-comment-76-2
τὸν ἐμὸν … πατέρ’ ἄθλιον
36
mvp-comment-77-1
παντοίας
37
mvp-comment-77-2
Electra's lyrics contain some Doricisms (129, 146 f., etc.): but it is best to retain
φιλότητος
, with the MSS. The form in
η
was so familiar through Homer that it may have been preferred to
φιλότατος
even in lyrics.
Cp. 236
.
mvp-comment-78-1
ἀλύειν
38
mvp-comment-79-1
αἰαῖ, ἱκνοῦμαι
39
mvp-comment-80-1
τόν γ’ ἐξ Ἀΐδα … λίμνας
40
mvp-comment-80-2
παγκοίνου
41
mvp-comment-80-3
ἀνστάσεις
42
mvp-comment-81-1
οὔτε †γόοις οὔτε λιταῖσιν
43
οὔτε γόοισιν οὔτ’ εὐχαῖς
44
mvp-comment-82-1
For the repetition of
ἀλλά
45
mvp-comment-82-2
ἀπὸ τῶν μετρίων
46
mvp-comment-82-3
ἀμήχανον
47
mvp-comment-82-4
ο=ιόλλυσαι
48
mvp-comment-83-1
ἐν οἷς
49
mvp-comment-83-2
ἀνάλυσις … κακῶν
50
mvp-comment-83-3
τί μοι
51
mvp-comment-84-1
νήπιος
52
mvp-comment-84-2
γονέων
53
mvp-comment-85-1
ἐμέ γ’ … ἄραρεν
54
mvp-comment-85-2
φρένας
55
mvp-comment-86-1
αἰὲν Ἴτυν
56
mvp-comment-87-1
ὄρνις
57
mvp-comment-87-2
ἀτυζομένα
58
mvp-comment-87-3
Διὸς ἄγγελος
59
mvp-comment-88-1
Νιόβα, σὲ δ’
60
θεόν
61
mvp-comment-88-2
ἅτ’
62
mvp-comment-88-3
ἐν τάφῳ πετραίῳ
63
mvp-comment-89-1
αἰεὶ
64
mvp-comment-90-1
οὔτοι σοὶ μούνᾳ
65
mvp-comment-91-1
πρὸς ὅ τι
66
mvp-comment-91-2
τῶν ἔνδον εἶ περισσά
67
mvp-comment-92-1
οἷς
68
τῶν ἔνδον
69
mvp-comment-92-2
ὁμόθεν
70
γονᾷ ξύναιμος
71
mvp-comment-93-1
οἵα Χρ. ζώει
72
mvp-comment-93-2
Acc. to the version followed by Sophocles, Agamemnon had four daughters, Iphigeneia, Electra, Chrysothemis, Iphianassa. This was the account given in the cyclic
Κύπρια ἔπη
, as the schol. here mentions; a poem of which there is another trace in this play (566 ff.). Sophocles wrote an
Ἰφιγένεια
(
Nauck,
frag. Soph. 284—292
); but her name is not mentioned in the reference to her death below (530—594). In
Il. 9. 145
Agamemnon has three daughters, Chrysothemis, Laodicè, Iphianassa: Homer does not mention Iphigeneia. Lucretius gives the name of Iphianassa to the victim at Aulis (
1. 85
).
mvp-comment-93-3
ζώει
73
mvp-comment-93-4
καὶ Ἰφιάνασσα
74
mvp-comment-94-1
ἀχέων
75
mvp-comment-94-2
Hermann, taking
ἀχέων
76
κρυπτᾷ
77
mvp-comment-95-1
ὄλβιος, ὃν
78
mvp-comment-95-2
For the simple
ὅς
, instead of
ὅς γε
or
ὅστις
, with causal force, cp. below, 188, 261, 959;
O.T. 817.
mvp-comment-96-1
δέξεται εὐπατρίδαν
79
mvp-comment-96-2
Διὸς εὔφρονι
80
βήματι
81
mvp-comment-96-3
γᾶν
82
γᾶ
83
mvp-comment-96-4
Ὀρέσταν
84
ὃν
85
mvp-comment-97-1
ἀκάματα
86
mvp-comment-97-2
ἀνύμφευτος
87
ἄτεκνος
88
mvp-comment-97-3
οἰχνῶ
89
mvp-comment-98-1
δάκρυσι μυδαλέα
90
mvp-comment-98-2
τὸν ἀνήνυτον
91
mvp-comment-98-3
οἶτον ἔχουσα
92
mvp-comment-99-1
ὧν τ’ ἔπαθ’
93
ὧν τ’ ἐδάη
94
mvp-comment-99-2
Wecklein, reading
ἐδάην
, explains,— ‘what I have heard from him,’—viz., his promises of coming.
mvp-comment-99-3
τί γὰρ … ἀγγελίας
95
mvp-comment-99-4
ἀπατώμενον
96
τί … οὐκ
97
mvp-comment-99-5
Herwerden's
οὐχί μοι
98
οὐκ ἐμοί
99
ὁ δέ
100
mvp-comment-100-1
ποθεῖ, ποθῶν δ’
101
mvp-comment-101-1
ἔτι μέγας οὐρανῷ
102
ἐν
103
mvp-comment-102-1
τὸν ὑπεραλγῆ
104
mvp-comment-102-2
νέμουσα
105
mvp-comment-103-1
μήτε ὑπεράχθεο
106
οἷς
107
mvp-comment-104-1
εὐμαρὴς θεός
108
θεός
109
mvp-comment-105-1
οὔτε γὰρ
110
mvp-comment-105-2
Κρῖσαν
111
mvp-comment-105-3
Crisa stood about two miles W.S.W. of Delphi, on a spur of Parnassus, at the lower outlet of the gorge through which the river Pleistus issues into the plain. The
Iliad mentions ‘sacred Crisa’ (
ζαθέην
, 2. 520). But the Homeric Hymn to the Pythian Apollo is the best witness to its ancient power. There, just as here, the name
Κρῖσα
includes the land which stretches southward from the town to its harbour on the ‘wide gulf’ (vv. 253— 261). We need not, then, read
Κρίσᾳ
or
Κρίσας
. Crisa was the earliest seat of trade on the western sea; Delphi, when first founded, was merely a sanctuary in its territory. Pindar recalls the old prominence of its name when he describes a Pythian victory as won
Κρισαίαις ἐνὶ πτυχαῖς
(
P. 6. 18).
mvp-comment-105-4
Cirrha, a town of much later date, was the port of Crisa on the gulf. About 585 B.C., the Delphians, aided by Cleisthenes of Sicyon and his allies, succeeded, after a long struggle, in humbling Crisa and destroying Cirrha. The Crisaean plain was then devoted to Apollo, whose domain was thus extended from his temple to the coast. When Sophocles wrote, that ground was still a
βούνομος ἀκτή
, inviolable by plough or spade. It was not till the middle of the next century that the alleged encroachments of Amphissa on the
ἱερὰ χώρα
gave a pretext for war to the Amphictyons (355 B.C.).
mvp-comment-105-5
Ulrichs (
Reisen in Griechenland) was the first to place the relations of Crisa and Cirrha in a clear light. Strabo correctly describes the site of Cirrha, but erroneously places Crisa to the east of it (9. p. 418).
mvp-comment-106-1
βούνομον
112
βουνόμον
113
mvp-comment-106-2
βούνομον ἀκτὰν
114
Κρῖσαν
115
mvp-comment-107-1
ἀπερίτροπος
116
mvp-comment-108-1
παρὰ τὸν Ἀχέροντα
117
ἀνάσσων
118
θεὸς
119
mvp-comment-109-1
μὲν
120
mvp-comment-109-2
ὁ πολὺς … βίοτος
121
mvp-comment-109-3
ἀνέλπιστος
122
mvp-comment-109-4
187 *
τεκέων
. I am now satisfied that this is a true correction of
τοκέων
123
ἅτις
124
τοκέων
125
mvp-comment-110-1
ἁπερεί
126
mvp-comment-110-2
ἔποικος
127
mvp-comment-111-1
οἰκονομῶ θαλάμους
128
mvp-comment-112-1
ἀεικεῖ σὺν στολᾷ
129
mvp-comment-113-1
κεναῖς δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
130
ἀμφίσταμαι
131
mvp-comment-113-2
Hartung, reading
κενὰ δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
, takes the sense to be that she stands ‘hungry’ by the tables at which the others feast. But
κενή
as=
νῆστις
would be neither usual nor elegant.
mvp-comment-114-1
Hitherto the Chorus have offered consolation or counsel. At v. 213 they return to that strain. But here, moved by Electra's misery, they join with her in bewailing its cause.
mvp-comment-114-2
οἰκτρὰ μὲν … πλαγά
132
κοίταις
133
οἰκτρὰ … αὐδὰ
134
mvp-comment-114-3
Sophocles, who follows the Homeric story as to the banquet, could not but remember the
οἰκτροτάτην ὄπα
of the dying Cassandra. And this might naturally suggest to him that other
οἰκτρὰ αὐδή
which she had uttered at an earlier moment, immediately after Agamemnon's return,—her presage of his fate, and her own:
Aesch.
Ag. 1072
—1314.
mvp-comment-114-4
The sense then is:—‘There was a voice of lamentation at the return from Troy’; alluding especially to Cassandra's laments, but also, perhaps, to forebodings in the mouth of the people at Mycenae. ‘And there was a voice of lamentation
ἐν κοίταις πατρῴαις
, when thy father lay on the couch at the fatal banquet.’ The ‘voice’ at the banquet is, first, that of the dying Agamemnon; but Sophocles may have thought also of Cassandra's death-cry, which was sounding in the king's ears as he fell.—For other interpretations, see Appendix.
mvp-comment-114-5
νόστοις
135
ἐν
136
mvp-comment-114-6
κοίταις
137
mvp-comment-114-7
ὅτε οἱ
138
σοι
139
ἀνταία
140
mvp-comment-114-8
γενύων
141
mvp-comment-115-1
δόλος … ἔρος
142
mvp-comment-116-1
δεινὰν δεινῶς
143
δεινὰν … μορφάν
144
mvp-comment-116-2
εἴτ’ οὖν … εἴτε
145
βροτῶν
146
mvp-comment-117-1
πλέον … ἐχθίστα
147
mvp-comment-117-2
δὴ
148
mvp-comment-118-1
νὺξ
149
mvp-comment-118-2
δείπνων
150
mvp-comment-119-1
ἄχθη
151
τοῖς
152
θανάτους
153
mvp-comment-119-2
διδύμαιν χειροῖν
154
διδύμοιν
155
mvp-comment-120-1
εἷλον … πρόδοτον
156
mvp-comment-121-1
οἷς
157
mvp-comment-121-2
Ὀλύμπιος
158
mvp-comment-122-1
ποίνιμα
159
mvp-comment-123-1
ἀγλαΐας
160
mvp-comment-123-2
ἀποναίατο
161
mvp-comment-124-1
πόρσω
162
mvp-comment-125-1
γνώμαν ἴσχεις
163
mvp-comment-125-2
ἐξ οἵων
164
mvp-comment-125-3
τὰ παρόντ’
165
mvp-comment-125-4
οἰκείας
166
mvp-comment-126-1
πολύ … τι κακῶν
167
mvp-comment-126-2
ὑπερεκτήσω
168
mvp-comment-127-1
τὰ δὲ
169
οὐκ ἐριστὰ τοῖς δυνατοῖς
170
πλάθειν
171
mvp-comment-127-2
ἐριστά
172
mvp-comment-127-3
πλάθειν
173
mvp-comment-128-1
δεινοῖς ἠναγκάσθην
174
mvp-comment-129-1
ὀργά
175
ἔξοιδ’
176
mvp-comment-130-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
177
mvp-comment-130-2
ἐν … δεινοῖς
178
mvp-comment-130-3
σχήσω
179
mvp-comment-130-4
ταύτας ἄτας
180
mvp-comment-131-1
ὄφρα
181
mvp-comment-131-2
βίος ἔχῃ με
182
σχήσω
183
mvp-comment-132-1
τίνι γάρ … τίνι φρονοῦντι καίρια
184
ἀκούσαιμ’ ἂν πρόσφορον ἔπος
185
τίνι
186
πρόσφορον
187
mvp-comment-132-2
Other explanations are:—(1) Taking the dative with
πρόσφορον
:—‘To what person who feels aright would that word be suitable which I should hear (=which would be said of me)?’ That is: Should I not deserve to incur a censure from which every right-minded person would shrink? Should I not deserve to be called
δυσσεβής
? This seems forced; and it does not well suit
ἔπος
. (2) Taking the dative with
ἀκούσαιμι
:—‘At whose mouth (=
from whom), that thinks aright, could I hear a suitable word of comfort?’ But such a dative seems impossible. In
Il. 16. 515
δύνασαι δὲ σὺ πάντοσ’ ἀκούειν
|
ἀνέρι κηδομένῳ
, the dat. is one of interest, denoting the person whose prayer is heard (‘
for him’); cp.
Il. 5. 115
κλῦθί μοι
: 24. 335
ἔκλυες ᾧ κ’ ἐθέλῃσθα
.
mvp-comment-133-1
ἄνετε
188
mvp-comment-133-2
ἄλυτα
189
mvp-comment-133-3
κεκλήσεται
190
mvp-comment-133-4
231 f. For
ἐκ
191
mvp-comment-133-5
ἀνάριθμος
192
θρήνων
193
mvp-comment-134-1
ἀλλ’ οὖν
194
γε
195
εὐνοίᾳ
196
mvp-comment-135-1
μάτηρ ὡσεί τις
197
mvp-comment-136-1
μὴ τίκτειν
198
mvp-comment-136-2
ἄταν ἄταις
199
mvp-comment-137-1
καὶ τί μέτρον
200
κακότατος
201
mvp-comment-137-2
φέρε
202
mvp-comment-137-3
ἐπὶ τοῖς φθ.
203
mvp-comment-138-1
ἔβλαστ’
204
mvp-comment-139-1
τούτοις
205
mvp-comment-140-1
εἴ τῳ πρόσκειμαι χρηστῷ
206
mvp-comment-141-1
ξυνναίοιμ’
207
mvp-comment-141-2
εὔκηλος
208
mvp-comment-141-3
γονέων
209
ἐκτίμους
210
mvp-comment-141-4
ἐκτίμους ἵσχουσα
211
mvp-comment-141-5
πτέρυγας … γόων
212
mvp-comment-141-6
ὀξυτόνων
213
mvp-comment-142-1
εἰ γὰρ
214
mvp-comment-142-2
γᾶ
215
mvp-comment-142-3
οὐδὲν
216
ὢν
217
εἰ
218
mvp-comment-142-4
Electra is contrasting her father, whose earthly life has been cut short, with his murderers, who survive. But she believes that his spirit lives in the world below, and will be active in aiding the vengeance (453 ff.).
mvp-comment-142-5
πάλιν
219
mvp-comment-142-6
ἀντιφόνους δίκας
220
mvp-comment-143-1
ἔρροι τ’
221
mvp-comment-143-2
αἰδὼς
222
εὐσέβεια
223
mvp-comment-144-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
224
mvp-comment-144-2
καὶ
225
τὸ σὸν … καὶ τοὐμὸν
226
mvp-comment-145-1
νίκα
227
mvp-comment-145-2
ἅμα
228
mvp-comment-146-1
πολλοῖσι θρήνοις
229
mvp-comment-147-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
230
mvp-comment-148-1
ἥτις εὐγενὴς γυνή
231
mvp-comment-149-1
πατρῷα … πήματα
232
mvp-comment-150-1
κατ’ εὐφρόνην
233
mvp-comment-150-2
θάλλοντα
234
mvp-comment-151-1
ᾗ
235
mvp-comment-151-2
πρῶτα μὲν … εἶτα … ἔπειτα
236
ᾗ
237
mvp-comment-151-3
τὰ μητρὸς
238
mvp-comment-151-4
ἔχθιστα συμβέβηκεν
239
mvp-comment-152-1
κἀκ τῶνδ’ ἄρχομαι
240
mvp-comment-153-1
λαβεῖν … τὸ τητᾶσθαι
241
mvp-comment-154-1
ποίας
242
δοκεῖς
243
mvp-comment-155-1
ἴδω
244
εἰσίδω δ’
245
ἴδω δὲ
246
mvp-comment-155-2
μὲν
247
mvp-comment-156-1
ἐσθήματα
248
mvp-comment-156-2
ἐκείνῳ
249
mvp-comment-156-3
παρεστίους … λοιβάς
250
ἔνθ’ ἐκεῖνον ὤλεσεν
251
mvp-comment-156-4
Acc. to
Homer. Hymn. 29. 4 ff., feasts began and ended with libations to Hestia:
οὐ γὰρ ἄτερ σοῦ
|
εἰλαπίναι θνητοῖσιν, ἵν’ οὐ πρώτῃ πυμάτῃ τε
|
Ἱστίῃ ἀρχόμενος σπένδει μελιηδέα οἶνον
. Soph. fr. 658
<*> πρῷρα λοιβῆς Ἑστία
. Other divinities, including Zeus
σωτήρ
, were similarly honoured; then the paean was sung, and the
πότος
began ( Plat.
Symp.p. 176 A).
mvp-comment-157-1
τούτων
252
mvp-comment-158-1
αὐτοέντην
253
mvp-comment-158-2
Brunck first adopted
αὐτοέντην
254
αὐτοφόντην
255
mvp-comment-158-3
ἡμὶν
256
mvp-comment-159-1
ταλαίνῃ
257
mvp-comment-160-1
ταύτην … τῷδε
258
mvp-comment-161-1
μιάστορι
259
Ἐρινὺν
260
mvp-comment-162-1
ἐγγελῶσα τοῖς ποιουμένοις
261
mvp-comment-163-1
εὑροῦς’
262
τότε
263
mvp-comment-163-2
The conjecture
φρουροῦς’
264
τηροῦς’
265
mvp-comment-164-1
χοροὺς ἵστησι
266
mvp-comment-164-2
μηλοσφαγεῖ … ἱερὰ
267
mvp-comment-164-3
ἔμμην’ ἱερά
268
mvp-comment-164-4
τοῖς σωτηρίοις
269
mvp-comment-164-5
Argive tradition placed Agamemnon's death on the 13th of Gamelion (about the end of January). So said ‘the Argive historians’ (
οἱ Ἀργολικοὶ συγγραφεῖς
),— according to an Argive writer named Deinias, who lived about 225 B.C. (Schol. here: Müller,
Frag. Hist. vol. III. p. 25.) Possibly, then, the idea of Clytaemnestra's hideous festival may have been suggested to the poet by some actual commemoration of the event in Argolis. There was a cult of Agamemnon in various places,—notably in Laconia. (Cp. Roscher's
Lexicon, p. 96.)
mvp-comment-165-1
ἡ δύσμορος
270
κατὰ στέγας
271
mvp-comment-166-1
τέτηκα
272
mvp-comment-166-2
πατρὸς
273
mvp-comment-166-3
The
δαίς
is the feast which, in Homeric fashion (
Il. 1. 467
), would follow the sacrifice (281). Acc. to Eustathius p. 1507. 61 (on
Hom.
Od. 4. 524
ff.),
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαὶς
(or
τράπεζα
) was a proverb
ἐπὶ τῶν ἐπ’ ὀλέθρῳ εὐωχουμένων
. The poet may mean that Clytaemnestra called the festival
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαίς
, in direct allusion to
δεῖπνα ἄρρητα
(203): and this would give a special point to
ἐγγελῶσα
(277). Cp.
Eur.
Or. 1008
τά τ’ ἐπώνυμα δεῖπνα Θυέστου
. But the words do not necessarily imply more than that she called it
Ἀγαμεμνόνεια
.
mvp-comment-167-1
αὐτὴ πρὸς αὑτήν
274
αὑτήν
275
mvp-comment-167-2
κλαῦσαι
276
mvp-comment-167-3
ἡδονὴν φέρει
277
mvp-comment-168-1
ἡ λόγοισι γενναία
278
mvp-comment-169-1
φωνοῦσα
279
mvp-comment-170-1
δύσθεον
280
mvp-comment-170-2
μίσημα
281
mvp-comment-170-3
σοὶ μόνῃ
282
mvp-comment-170-4
τέθνηκεν
283
mvp-comment-170-5
ἐν πένθει
284
mvp-comment-171-1
ἐκ γόων
285
mvp-comment-171-2
οἱ κάτω θεοί
286
mvp-comment-172-1
τάδ’
287
mvp-comment-172-2
ἥξοντ’ Ὀρέστην
288
mvp-comment-173-1
παραστᾶς’
289
mvp-comment-174-1
ἥτις
290
mvp-comment-174-2
ὑπεξέθου
291
mvp-comment-175-1
ἀλλ’ ἴσθι τοι τείσουσά γ’
292
mvp-comment-176-1
ὑλακτεῖ
293
mvp-comment-176-2
σὺν
294
mvp-comment-176-3
πέλας
295
παρών
296
mvp-comment-176-4
301 The adv.
πάντα
297
mvp-comment-176-5
ἄναλκις
298
mvp-comment-176-6
ἡ πᾶσα βλάβη
299
mvp-comment-177-1
σὺν γυναιξὶ
300
mvp-comment-177-2
τὰς μάχας
301
mvp-comment-178-1
ἐφήξειν
302
mvp-comment-179-1
μέλλων … δρᾶν τι
303
mvp-comment-179-2
τὰς οὔσας τε … καὶ τὰς ἀπούσας
304
mvp-comment-179-3
μου
305
μοι
306
mvp-comment-179-4
διέφθορεν
307
mvp-comment-180-1
σωφρονεῖν
308
εὐσεβεῖν
309
mvp-comment-180-2
ἔν τοι κακοῖς
310
mvp-comment-180-3
πολλή )στ’ ἀνάγκη
311
κἀπιτηδεύειν κακά
312
mvp-comment-180-4
I place only a comma, not a colon, after
πάρεστιν
313
mvp-comment-181-1
ὄντος … βεβῶτος
314
mvp-comment-182-1
ἦ κάρτα
315
mvp-comment-182-2
θυραῖον
316
mvp-comment-182-3
οἰχνεῖν
317
mvp-comment-182-4
ἀγροῖσι
318
mvp-comment-182-5
τυγχάνει
319
mvp-comment-183-1
ἦ κἂν … ἱκοίμην
320
ἦ τ<*>ν
321
ἦ δἂν
322
mvp-comment-183-2
ἐς λόγους τοὺς σοὺς ἱκοίμην
323
mvp-comment-184-1
ὡς νῦν
324
ὥς νυν
325
mvp-comment-184-2
ἱστόρει· τί σοι φίλον
326
τό
327
τά
328
mvp-comment-184-3
With the other punctuation,
ἱστόρει τί σοι φίλον
329
mvp-comment-185-1
καὶ δὴ
330
mvp-comment-185-2
τοῦ κασιγνήτου τί φής
331
mvp-comment-185-3
ἥξοντος
332
ἢ μέλλοντος
333
mvp-comment-186-1
φησίν γε
334
mvp-comment-186-2
ποεῖ
335
mvp-comment-187-1
καὶ μὴν ἔγωγ’
336
γε
337
mvp-comment-187-2
οὐκ ὄκνῳ
338
mvp-comment-188-1
ἀρκεῖν
339
mvp-comment-189-1
ἐπεί
340
mvp-comment-189-2
μακρὰν
341
mvp-comment-189-3
324 Here, as in 316,
νῦν
342
νυν
343
mvp-comment-189-4
δόμων
344
φέρουσαν
345
mvp-comment-190-1
ὅμαιμον
346
mvp-comment-190-2
φύσιν
347
mvp-comment-191-1
Χρυσόθεμιν
348
mvp-comment-192-1
οἷα
349
νομίζεται
350
mvp-comment-193-1
πρὸς θυρῶνος ἐξόδοις
351
φωνεῖς
352
ἐλθοῦσα
353
αὖ
354
mvp-comment-193-2
330 For the absence of caesura, cp.
Ph. 101
n.
mvp-comment-194-1
θυμῷ … χαρίζεσθαι
355
mvp-comment-195-1
καίτοι τοσοῦτόν γ’ οἶδα
356
mvp-comment-195-2
κἀμαυτήν, ὅτι
357
mvp-comment-195-3
333 f. For the repeated
ἄν
358
mvp-comment-195-4
οἶ) αὐτοῖς φρονῶ
359
mvp-comment-196-1
ὑφειμένῃ
360
πλεῖν
361
mvp-comment-196-2
For the image, cp.
Eur.
Med. 524
ἄκροισι λαίφους κρασπέδοις
(with close-reefed sails)
ὑπεκφυγεῖν
|
τὴν σὴν στόμαργον, ὦ γύναι, γλωσσαλγίαν
:
Ar.
Ran. 997
ἀλλ’ ὅπως, ὦ γεννάδα
, |
μὴ πρὸς ὀργὴν ἀντιλέξεις
, |
ἀλλὰ συστείλας, ἄκροισι
|
χρώμενος τοῖς ἱστίοις κ.τ.λ.
: and conversely
Soph.
Ant. 715
ναὸς ὅστις ἐγκρατῆ πόδα
|
τείνας ὑπείκει μηδέν
.
Ovid
Epist. 1. 8. 71
moderatius opta, | Et voti, quaeso, contrahe vela tui.
Shakesp.
Henry VI., pt. iii, act 3 sc. 3. 5
‘Now Margaret | Must strike her sail, and learn awhile to serve | Where kings command.’
mvp-comment-197-1
καὶ μὴ δοκεῖν
362
mvp-comment-198-1
τοιαῦτα δ’ ἄλλα
363
ἀλλὰ
364
ἄλλα
365
mvp-comment-199-1
καίτοι τὸ μὲν δίκαιον
366
mvp-comment-199-2
κρίνεις
367
mvp-comment-199-3
εἰ … με δεῖ
368
mvp-comment-199-4
ἐλευθέραν
369
mvp-comment-199-5
ζῆν
370
mvp-comment-199-6
πάντ’
371
mvp-comment-199-7
ἀκουστέα
372
mvp-comment-200-1
δεινόν γε
373
mvp-comment-201-1
τῆς … τικτούσης
374
mvp-comment-201-2
μέλειν
375
mvp-comment-202-1
τἀμὰ νουθετήματα
376
mvp-comment-202-2
κείνης διδακτά
377
mvp-comment-202-3
ἐκ σαυτῆς
378
mvp-comment-203-1
The text, which has been suspected (cr. n.), is sound; but the train of thought is somewhat obscured by compression.
mvp-comment-203-2
‘You forget your father, and care only for your mother. All your counsels to me come from her. Then (
ἔπειτα
),—that being so,—give up the attempt at a compromise. Make a
choice (
ἑλοῦ γε
). You can be imprudent (
φρονεῖν κακῶς
),—as you say that I am,—and loyal to your dead father. Or you can be prudent (
φρονοῦσα
), and forgetful of him,—as you actually are; you who (
ἥτις
) say, indeed, that you would show your hatred of the murderers if you could; and yet, when I
do resist them, you try to turn me from my purpose. You merely add the shame of cowardice to our woes.’
mvp-comment-203-3
ἔπειθ’
379
mvp-comment-203-4
ἑλοῦ γε
380
mvp-comment-203-5
φρονεῖν κακῶς
381
mvp-comment-203-6
Other explanations are:—(1) ‘Choose to be thought either
lost to right feeling, or, if you have such feeling, then at least
forgetful of your duty.’ (2) ‘Choose to seem either
unintelligent (if you are merely the blind instrument of our rulers); or, if you act with clear understanding (
φρονοῦσα
),—thinking to benefit me,—at least forgetful of your father.’ Both these views assume that the question is merely between two interpretations which might be placed on the present conduct of Chrysothemis. But Electra is putting the dilemma between imprudent loyalty and prudent disloyalty.
mvp-comment-204-1
τῶν φίλων
382
mvp-comment-205-1
ἥτις
383
φρονοῦσα
384
μῖσος
385
mvp-comment-206-1
πάντα
386
mvp-comment-206-2
τιμωρουμένης
387
mvp-comment-207-1
οὔτε … τε
388
mvp-comment-207-2
τήν τε δρῶσαν
389
mvp-comment-208-1
πρὸς κακοῖσι
390
mvp-comment-208-2
δειλίαν ἔχει
391
mvp-comment-209-1
ἐπεὶ
392
mvp-comment-209-2
ἢ μάθ’ ἐξ ἐμοῦ
393
mvp-comment-210-1
ἐπαρκούντως
394
mvp-comment-211-1
προσάπτειν
395
mvp-comment-211-2
εἴ τις ἔστ’ ἐκεῖ χάρις
396
mvp-comment-212-1
ἡμὶν
397
ξύνει
398
mvp-comment-213-1
τὰ σὰ … δῶῤ
399
mvp-comment-213-2
ἐφ’ οἶσι
400
mvp-comment-213-3
χλιδᾷς
401
mvp-comment-214-1
ὑπεικάθοιμι
402
mvp-comment-214-2
πλουσία
403
mvp-comment-214-3
περιρρείτω
404
mvp-comment-215-1
τοὐμὲ μὴ λυπεῖν
405
mvp-comment-215-2
Remark the resemblance to the passage where Antigone—summing up her position—compares the
moral pain of neglecting her duty with those penalties which she contemns:—
κείνοις ἂν ἤλγουν· τοῖσδε δ’ οὐκ ἀλγύνομαι
(
Ant. 468
). There, too, we have a Sophoclean triad of clauses, the third echoing the first,—as
τῆς σῆς δ’ οὐκ ἐρῶ τιμῆς τυχεῖν
here reiterates the sense of
σοὶ δὲ πλουσία... βίος
(n. on
Ant. 465
ff.).
mvp-comment-215-3
One of the scholia recognises the traditional reading, and explains it correctly: —
τοῦτο μόνον ἐμὲ βοσκέτω, τὸ μὴ λυπεῖν ἐμὲ αὐτήν, εἰ
(‘as I should do, if’)
τοῖς φονεῦσι τοῦ πατρὸς πείθεσθαι ἀναγκασθήσομαι
.—The conjectures have been numerous: see Appendix.
mvp-comment-216-1
οὐδ’ ἂν σὺ
406
mvp-comment-217-1
παῖδα
407
mvp-comment-217-2
κεκλῆσθαι
408
mvp-comment-218-1
πλείστοις
409
mvp-comment-219-1
μηδὲν
410
πρὸς ὀργὴν
411
mvp-comment-220-1
ἀμφοῖν
412
τοῖς λόγοις
413
mvp-comment-221-1
τῆσδε … αὕτη
414
πάλιν
415
mvp-comment-222-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
416
mvp-comment-222-2
πως
417
mvp-comment-222-3
μύθων
418
mvp-comment-223-1
οὐδ’
419
κοὐδ’
420
ποτέ
421
mvp-comment-224-1
ἰὸν
422
mvp-comment-224-2
σχήσει
423
mvp-comment-225-1
τὸ δεινὸν
424
mvp-comment-225-2
εἰ γὰρ τῶνδέ μοι
425
εἰ
426
mvp-comment-226-1
γὰρ
427
mvp-comment-226-2
γόων
428
λόγων
429
mvp-comment-227-1
ἐνταῦθα
430
mvp-comment-227-2
ἔνθα μή ποτε … προσόψει
431
mvp-comment-227-3
ζῶσα
432
mvp-comment-227-4
κατηρεφεῖ
433
mvp-comment-227-5
χθονὸς τῆσδ’ ἐκτὸς
434
mvp-comment-227-6
ὑμνήσεις
435
mvp-comment-228-1
πρὸς ταῦτα
436
mvp-comment-228-2
Nauck reads
κοὔ
437
καί
438
mvp-comment-228-3
ἐν καλῷ, εὔκαιρον
schol.:
H. 4. 3. 5
νομίσαντες οὐκ ἐν καλῷ εἶναι πρὸς τοὺς ὁπλίτας ἱππομαχεῖν
: so, too,
Eur.
Heracl. 971
, etc. Cp.
καλόν
(
ἐστι
)=
καίριον
in
Soph.
Ph. 1155
; and
εἰς καλόν
=
καιρίως
in
O.T. 78.
mvp-comment-229-1
ἦ ταῦτα δὴ
439
ἦ … δὴ
440
ἦ … γὰρ
441
mvp-comment-229-2
καὶ βεβούλευνται
442
mvp-comment-230-1
ἀλλ’ ἐξίκοιτο
443
mvp-comment-230-2
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκ’
444
mvp-comment-231-1
τίνα … τόνδ’
445
mvp-comment-231-2
τάλαινα
446
mvp-comment-232-1
εἴ τι τῶνδε
447
mvp-comment-233-1
ποῦ ποτ’ εἶ φρενῶν
448
mvp-comment-234-1
ὅπως
449
ὑμῶν
450
mvp-comment-234-2
προσώτατ’
451
προσωτάτω φύγω
452
mvp-comment-235-1
βίου … τοῦ παρόντος
453
mvp-comment-236-1
καλὸς γὰρ
454
mvp-comment-236-2
θαυμάσαι
455
mvp-comment-237-1
τοῖς φίλοις
456
mvp-comment-238-1
εἰκαθεῖν
457
mvp-comment-239-1
ταῦτα
458
οὐκ ἐμοὺς
459
mvp-comment-240-1
γε
460
μέντοι
461
mvp-comment-240-2
μὴ )ξ
462
mvp-comment-240-3
πεσεῖν
463
mvp-comment-240-4
399 A woman, speaking of herself in the plur., uses the masc.:
Ant. 926
παθόντες ἂν ξυγγνοῖμεν ἡμαρτηκότες
.
mvp-comment-241-1
συγγνώμην
464
mvp-comment-242-1
τἄπη
465
mvp-comment-242-2
πρὸς κακῶν
466
mvp-comment-243-1
μή πω
467
mvp-comment-244-1
οἷπερ … ὁδοῦ
468
mvp-comment-245-1
τῷ φέρεις
469
mvp-comment-245-2
ἔμπυρα
470
mvp-comment-246-1
τυμβεῦσαι χοάς
471
mvp-comment-247-1
βροτῶν
472
mvp-comment-248-1
ὃν ἔκταν’ αὐτή
473
ὅν γ’
474
mvp-comment-249-1
τῷ τοῦτ’ ἤρεσεν
475
mvp-comment-250-1
δείματος
476
mvp-comment-250-2
δοκεῖν ἐμοί
477
mvp-comment-251-1
θεοὶ πατρῷοι
478
mvp-comment-251-2
συγγένεσθέ γ’
479
mvp-comment-251-3
ἀλλὰ νῦν
480
mvp-comment-252-1
εἴποιμ’ ἂν τότε
481
mvp-comment-253-1
ἐπὶ σμικρὸν
482
ἐπὶ σμικρῶν
483
mvp-comment-253-2
φράσαι
484
mvp-comment-254-1
σμικροὶ λόγοι
485
mvp-comment-255-1
πατρὸς … δευτέραν ὁμιλίαν
486
mvp-comment-255-2
ἐφέστιον πῆξαι
487
mvp-comment-255-3
This sceptre is described in the
Iliad (2. 101 f.) as the work of Hephaestus, who gave it Zeus; Hermes transmitted it to Pelops, from whom it passed to Atreus and Agamemnon. The Homeric sceptre is often called
χρύσεον
(
Il. 2. 268
, etc.), prob. as being ornamented with gold foil, or studded with gold nails (
Il. 1. 246
χρυσείοις ἥλοισι πεπαρμένον
). Among the objects found at Mycenae are some supposed remains of such sceptres (Schliem.,
Myc. 201, etc.).
mvp-comment-255-4
οὑφόρει ποτέ
488
mvp-comment-256-1
ἔκ τε
489
ἐκ δὲ
490
mvp-comment-256-2
βρύοντα
491
mvp-comment-256-3
ᾧ … γενέσθαι
492
mvp-comment-256-4
The vision resembles that of Astyages, who dreamed that a vine sprang from his daughter Mandanè, the wife of Cambyses,
τὴν δὲ ἄμπελον ἐπισχεῖν τὴν Ἀσίην πᾶσαν
. The
ὀνειροπόλοι
explained this to mean that her son (Cyrus) should reign in his grandfather's stead. (
Her. 1. 108.
) The spreading branches figure also in the dream of Xerxes (7. 19):
ἐδόκεε...ἐστεφανῶσθαι ἐλαίης θαλλῷ, ἀπὸ δὲ τῆς ἐλαίης τοὺς κλάδους γῆν πᾶσαν ἐπισχεῖν
.
mvp-comment-256-5
In choosing the
sceptre of Agamemnon as the stock from which the wondrous growth is put forth, Sophocles may have had in mind the words of Achilles (
Il. 1. 234
ff.);
ναὶ μὰ τόδε σκῆπτρον· τὸ μὲν οὔποτε φύλλα καὶ ὄζους
|
φύσει, ἐπεὶ δὴ πρῶτα τομὴν ἐν ὄρεσσι λέλοιπεν
, |
οὐδ’ ἀναθηλήσει
.
mvp-comment-257-1
του παρόντος
493
τοῦ
494
παρόντος
495
του
496
mvp-comment-257-2
Ἡλίῳ δείκνυσι τοὖναρ
497
mvp-comment-258-1
οὐ κάτοιδα, πλὴν
498
mvp-comment-258-2
πέμπει με κείνη
499
mvp-comment-259-1
These three verses, which the MSS. give to Electra, and which several recent critics reject (cr. n.), clearly belong to Chrysothemis, and are genuine. Electra's exclamation of joy (411) caused Chrysothemis to ask if her sister had any ground for hope (412). Electra replied that, when she had heard the dream, she would say. This showed her sister that Electra relied merely on the fact that Clytaemnestra had seen
some fearful vision. Now, therefore, instead of asking for Electra's interpretation, she merely repeats her counsel (383 f.) before proceeding on her errand. The words
πρός
νυν θεῶν κ.τ.λ.
(428 ff.) show the train of her thought. To Chrysothemis, the alarm of Clytaemnestra (427) is more important than the apparition of Agamemnon. The dream is only a new reason why Electra should be cautious,—not why she should hope.
mvp-comment-259-2
The current ascription of the verses to Electra was doubtless prompted by verse 413. It was supposed that the recital of Chrysothemis must be immediately followed by the comments of Electra. But, as Hermann observed, the phrase
ἀβουλίᾳ πεσεῖν
would alone suffice to show that the verses belong to Chrysothemis (
cp. 398
). Nor could the warning,
σὺν κακῷ μέτει πάλιν
, be fitly uttered by Electra.
mvp-comment-259-3
τῶν ἐγγενῶν
500
mvp-comment-260-1
ἀβουλίᾳ
501
mvp-comment-260-2
σὺν κακῷ
502
mvp-comment-260-3
μέτει
503
mvp-comment-261-1
ἀλλ’
504
mvp-comment-261-2
ὦ φίλη
505
τούτων μὲν
506
mvp-comment-262-1
οὐ … θέμις
507
οὐδ’ ὅσιον
508
mvp-comment-262-2
ἐχθρᾶς ἀπὸ γυναικὸς
509
mvp-comment-262-3
κτερίσματ’
510
mvp-comment-262-4
λουτρὰ
511
mvp-comment-263-1
ἀλλ’ ἢ πνοαῖσιν
512
ῥοαῖσιν
513
mvp-comment-263-2
κρύψον
514
mvp-comment-263-3
νιν
515
mvp-comment-263-4
ἔνθα μή ποτ’
516
ἔνθεν
517
mvp-comment-263-5
εὐνὴν
518
mvp-comment-264-1
ἀλλ’ ὅταν θάῃν
519
mvp-comment-264-2
The conjecture
ἔστ’ ἂν
520
ὅταν
521
σῳζέσθω
522
mvp-comment-264-3
κειμήλἰ
523
mvp-comment-265-1
ἀρχὴν
524
τλημονεστάτη
525
mvp-comment-266-1
ἔβλαστε
526
mvp-comment-267-1
ὅν γ’ … τῷδ’
527
mvp-comment-267-2
ἐπέστεφε
528
mvp-comment-267-3
442 f. The position of
αὐτῇ
529
mvp-comment-267-4
δέξεσθαι
530
mvp-comment-267-5
It seems, then, a reasonable inference that here, where the reference is to future time, he would have written
δέξεσθαι
531
δέξασθαι
532
mvp-comment-267-6
444 ff. Join
θανὼν ἄτιμος
533
mvp-comment-267-7
ἐμασχαλίσθη
534
mvp-comment-267-8
Two different motives are assigned by the Greek commentators; viz.:—(1) the desire to render the dead incapable of wreaking vengeance (
ὥσπερ τὴν δύναμιν ἐκείνων ἀφαιρούμενοι
): (2) the desire to make an atonement (
ἐξιλάσασθαι τὴν δολοφονίαν—ἀφοσιοῦσθαι τὸν φόνον
). There can be little doubt that the first of these motives was the primitive origin of the custom. If the second was afterwards blended with it, the idea may have been that of offering the severed portions to the gods below,—as a victim was devoted to death by cutting off a lock of hair (
Eur.
Alc. 75
). Apollonius Rhodius seems to present the practice in this light (4. 477): Jason, having slain a foe,
ἐξάργματα τάμνε θανόντος
. Cp.
Etym. Magn.:
ἀπάργματα λέγεται τὰ ὑπὸ τῶν τραγῳδῶν λεγόμενα μασχαλίσματα
.
mvp-comment-267-9
κἀπὶ λουτροῖσιν
535
mvp-comment-267-10
ἐξέμαξ ν
536
mvp-comment-267-11
ἆρα μὴ
537
mvp-comment-268-1
οὐκ ἔστιν
538
mvp-comment-268-2
ταῦτα μὲν μέθες· σὺ δὲ
539
mvp-comment-269-1
βοστρύχων ἄκρας φόβας
540
mvp-comment-269-2
κἀμοῦ ταλαίνης
541
mvp-comment-270-1
†ἀλιπαρῆ
542
λιπαρῆ
543
mvp-comment-270-2
We come, therefore, to a dilemma. (1) The words
τήνδ’ ἀλιπαρῆ τρίχα
may conceal some corruption:
τήνδ’
ought possibly to be
τήνδε τ’
544
ἀλίπαρον
545
mvp-comment-270-3
(2) Or else, if the text be sound,
ἀλιπαρῆ
may mean
οὐ λιπαράν
. There is no doubt that
λιπ
, ‘fat,’ is the root both of
λι^παρός
, ‘shining,’ and of
λι—παρής
, ‘sticking’; cp.
Plat.
Crat. 427 B
τὸ λιπαρὸν καὶ τὸ κολλῶδες
(
Curt.
Etym. § 340
). Similarly
γλίσχρος
, ‘sticky,’ came to mean ‘importunate.’ It is barely possible that, in coining a new negative compound, the poet may have transferred the sense of
λιπαρός
to
λιπαρής
: but it seems improbable.
mvp-comment-271-1
ζῶμα
546
mvp-comment-271-2
χλιδαῖς
547
mvp-comment-272-1
προσπίτνουσα
548
αὐτὸν
549
mvp-comment-273-1
ἐξ ὑπερτέρας χερός
550
mvp-comment-273-2
ζῶντ’
551
mvp-comment-274-1
ἀφνεωτέραις
552
mvp-comment-274-2
στέφωμεν
553
mvp-comment-274-3
δωρούμεθα
554
mvp-comment-275-1
οἶμαι μὲν οὖν
555
mvp-comment-275-2
If
μέλον
556
μέλειν
557
μέλον
558
mvp-comment-276-1
σοί
559
mvp-comment-277-1
βροτῶν
560
mvp-comment-278-1
πρὸς εὐσέβειαν
561
mvp-comment-279-1
δράσω
562
mvp-comment-279-2
τὸ γὰρ δίκαιον
563
mvp-comment-279-3
(1)
τὸ δίκαιον
is an acc. of general reference, and
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
is impersonal. ‘With regard to what is (clearly) right, it is unreasonable for two persons to dispute; rather both should hasten on the doing (of it).’ With
ἀλλ’ ἐπισπεύδειν
we supply the notion
δεῖ
from the negative
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
(as from
οὐκ ἔξεστι
in
O. C. 1402
ff.; cp.
O. T. 817
ff.). For the form of the sentence, cp.
H. 7. 3. 7
τοὺς περὶ Ἀρχίαν...οὐ ψῆφον ἀνεμείνατε, ἀλλὰ ὁπότε πρῶτον ἐδυνάσθητε ἐτιμωρήσασθε
. So here the acc.
τὸ δίκαιον
, which represents the object of
δρᾶν
, is separated from it by the parenthesis
οὐκ
ἔχει λόγον δυοῖν ἐρίζειν
. (The first scholium gives substantially this view:
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον φιλονεικεῖν περὶ τοῦ δικαίου, ὥστε περὶ αὐτοῦ δύο ὄντας ἐρίζειν
.)
mvp-comment-279-4
(2) Or
τὸ δίκαιον
might be nom.: ‘that which is clearly right does not
afford any ground (
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
) for two persons to dispute,’ etc. So the second schol.:
ἢ τὸ οὐκ ἔχει λόγον ἀντὶ τοῦ οὐ παρέχει πρόφασιν
. So far as the verb
ἔχει
is concerned, this sense is quite admissible: cp.
Thuc. 2. 41
οὔτε τῷ πολεμίῳ ἐπελθόντι ἀγανάκτησιν ἔχει
(
ἡ πόλις
). The objection is that the phrases
ἔχειν λόγον, οὐκ ἔχειν λόγον
, which are very common, regularly mean, ‘to be reasonable,’ ‘to be unreasonable.’ This is so both in the personal and in the impersonal constr.; as Plat.
Phaedop. 62 D
τὸ γὰρ μὴ ἀγανακτεῖν...οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
:
Dem. or. 36 § 54
πῶς ἔχει λόγον σὲ...δίκην ἀξιοῦν λαμβάνειν
; The supposed sense, ‘not to
afford a reason,’ is unexampled.
mvp-comment-279-5
δυοῖν
564
mvp-comment-280-1
παρ’ ὑμῶν
565
mvp-comment-281-1
πικρὰν
566
δοκῶ με … τολμήσειν
567
ἔτι
568
mvp-comment-282-1
εἰ μὴ )γὼ
569
mvp-comment-282-2
γνώμας λειπομένα
570
mvp-comment-283-1
ἁ πρόμαντις Δίκα
571
mvp-comment-283-2
δίκαια φερομένα χεροῖν κράτη
572
mvp-comment-284-1
μέτεισιν
573
mvp-comment-284-2
οὐ μακροῦ χρόνου
574
mvp-comment-285-1
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
575
κλύουσαν
576
mvp-comment-285-2
ἁδυπνόων … ὀνειράτων
577
mvp-comment-286-1
ἀμναστεῖ γ’ ὁ φύσας ς’
578
mvp-comment-287-1
χαλκόπλακτος
579
mvp-comment-287-2
γένυς
580
mvp-comment-287-3
The very axe (
φόνιος πέλεκυς
, 99) with which the blow was dealt is imagined as nourishing a grudge against the murderers who had set it such a task. Such a personification recalls that practice of Athenian law by which inanimate objects which had caused death were brought to a formal trial in the court called
τὸ ἐπὶ Πρυτανείῳ
, and, after sentence, cast beyond the boundaries, in the presence of the Archon Basileus and the sacrificial officers of the tribes (
φυλο‐
βασιλεῖς
). Aeschin. or. 3 § 244
τὰ μὲν ξύλα καὶ τοὺς λίθους καὶ τὸν σίδηρον, τὰ ἄφωνα καὶ ἀγνώμονα, ἐάν τῳ ἐμπεσόντα ἀποκτείνῃ, ὑπερορίζομεν
. (Cp.
Dem. or. 23 § 76
.) A like conception was implied in the English law (repealed in 1846) of ‘deodands’ (Deo danda),
i.e., personal chattels (whether animals or things) which, having caused the death of a human being, were forfeited to the Crown for pious uses.
mvp-comment-288-1
ἐν αἰκίαις
581
mvp-comment-289-1
καὶ πολύπους καὶ πολύχειρ
582
mvp-comment-290-1
λόχοις
583
mvp-comment-290-2
χαλκόπους
584
mvp-comment-291-1
ἄλεκτρ’ ἄνυμφα
585
mvp-comment-291-2
γάμων ἁμιλλήμαθ’
586
mvp-comment-291-3
ἐπέβα
587
mvp-comment-292-1
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι … συνδρῶσιν
588
mvp-comment-292-2
Verses 495—497 (
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι...τέρας
) answer metrically to vv. 479—481
ὕπεστί μοι...ὀνειράτων
, where the text is certain, save for the doubt whether
θράσος
or
θάρσος
should stand in 479. Here we must first decide two points.
mvp-comment-292-3
(1) Are the words
πρὸ τῶνδε
589
mvp-comment-292-4
(2) Could
ἔχει με, μήποτε τέρας πελᾶν
(etc.) mean, ‘
the belief possesses me, that’ etc.? Surely not. No real parallel for so strange a phrase has been produced. It is irrelevant to quote those impersonal verbs which directly express the
occurrence of a thought to the mind; as
Xen.
An. 6. 1. 17
εἰσῄει αὐτοὺς ὅπως ἂν καὶ ἔχοντές τι οἴκαδε ἀφίκοιντο
(‘the thought came to them, how they might,’ etc.):
Thuc. 6. 78.
§ 1
εἰ δέ τῳ ἄρα παρέστηκε, τὸν μὲν Συρακόσιον...πολέμιον εἶναι κ.τ.λ.
Either, then, the subject to
ἔχει
has dropped out, or the words
μ’ ἔχει
conceal a corruption.
mvp-comment-292-5
The following remedies are possible: I incline to the first, as involving least change. (1) Reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
, we may read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοί μ’ ἔχει
|
<θάρσος τι>, μήποθ’ ἡμῖν
etc. (It may be remarked that
τι
is in harmony with the tone of
ὕπεστί μοι
in 479.) Another available word is
ξύννοια
(cp.
Ant. 279
). (2) Or, reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θάρσος
, we could read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι θάρσος ἴσχει με
. On either view, the
υ
of
ἁδυπνόων
in 480 is long (as several critics have assumed). It should be noted that (1) involves a different constitution of the verses: see p. lxxxii.
mvp-comment-292-6
In those MSS. which have
μή ποτε μή ποθ’ ἡμῖν
590
mvp-comment-293-1
ἀψεγές
591
ἀψεφές
592
mvp-comment-293-2
πελᾶν
593
mvp-comment-294-1
τοῖς δρῶσι
594
τοῖς συνδρῶσιν
595
mvp-comment-295-1
μαντεῖαι βροτῶν
596
mvp-comment-296-1
εὖ κατασχήσει
597
mvp-comment-297-1
ἱππεία
598
mvp-comment-297-2
Oenomaüs, king of Pisa in Elis, had promised the hand of his daughter Hippodameia to the suitor who should defeat him in a chariot-race; the penalty of failure being death. The young Pelops, son of Tantalus, offered himself as a competitor. Myrtilus, the charioteer of Oenomaüs, was persuaded (either by Hippodameia or by Pelops) to betray his master. He did so by leaving out one or both of the linch-pins by which the naves of the chariot-wheels were secured to the axles.
Tzetzes on Lycophron 156
ταῖς χοινίκισι
(=
πλήμναις
, the naves)
τῶν τροχῶν οὐκ ἐμβαλὼν τοὺς ἥλους
. According to another story, he substituted a linch-pin of wax for a real one (
schol. Apoll. Rh. 752
ἐμβαλόντα κήρινον ἔμβολον ἐπὶ τοῦ ἀκραξονίου
). So Pelops won the race, and the bride. But Oenomaüs was soon avenged on the traitor; for Myrtilus insulted Hippodameia, and was thrown into the sea by Pelops; upon whose house he invoked a curse, as he sank.
mvp-comment-297-3
Euripides, too, (
Or. 990
ff.,
Helen. 386 f.) refers to this chariot-race as the event with which the troubles of the Pelopidae began. Apollonius Rhodius briefly describes the critical moment of the race as one of the subjects embroidered on the cloak of Jason (1. 752 ff.); there Oenomaüs was seen, ‘falling sideways, as the axle broke at the naves of the wheels,’—
ἄξονος ἐν πλήμνῃσι παρακλιδὸν ἀγνυμένοιο
|
πίπτεν
.
mvp-comment-297-4
The eastern pediment of the temple of Zeus at Olympia (
circ. 450 B.C.) was adorned with sculptures by Paeonius, representing the preparation for this contest (
Paus. 5. 10. 6
). The fragments found on the site have sufficed for a reconstruction of the group. Zeus occupied the centre; to the right of him were Pelops and Hippodameia; to the left, Oenomaüs and his wife Steropè. On each side was a chariot drawn by four horses. Myrtilus was sitting in front of his team, with his face turned away from his master.
mvp-comment-297-5
In the older and nobler form of the myth, Pelops won, not by a fraud, but by the grace of Poseidon, who gave him winged horses (Pindar
O. 1. 87
ἔδωκεν δίφρον τε χούσεον πτεροῖσίν τ’ ἀκάμαντας ἵππους
). On the chest (
λάρναξ
) of Cypselus, seen by Pausanias in the Heraeum at Olympia (
Paus. 5. 17. 5
), Pelops was driving two winged horses.
mvp-comment-298-1
αἰανὴς
599
mvp-comment-298-2
The form
αἰανὴς
has the best authority, and some critics hold that
αἰανὸς
(Hesych.) was a Byzantine invention. But in
Aesch.
Eum. 416
,
ἡμεῖς γάρ ἐσμεν νυκτὸς αἰανῆς τέκνα
(so L, schol., and Tzetzes on Lycophron 406),
αἰανῆ
is far less suitable.
mvp-comment-299-1
εὖτε
600
mvp-comment-299-2
ὁ ποντισθεὶς Μυρτίλος
601
mvp-comment-299-3
A vase found at Capua shows Pelops and Hippodameia in a ship, from which Myrtilus is falling backwards into the water. A winged Erinys hovers in the air above, brandishing a sword over the head of Pelops (Baumeister,
Denkmäler p. 1204, referring to
Mon. Inst. x. 25).
mvp-comment-299-4
ἐκοιμάθη
602
mvp-comment-300-1
παγχρυσέων δίφρων
603
mvp-comment-301-1
πρόρριζος
604
mvp-comment-301-2
ἐκριφθείς
605
mvp-comment-302-1
ἔλειπεν
606
ἔλιπεν
607
οἴκου
608
οἴκους
609
πω
610
mvp-comment-303-1
πολύπονος
611
αἰκία
612
mvp-comment-304-1
ἀνειμένη
613
μέν
614
mvp-comment-304-2
ὡς ἔοικας
615
mvp-comment-304-3
στρέφει
616
mvp-comment-304-4
Clytaemnestra begins in the same strain as Chrysothemis, who likewise emphasised her reproof by the word
αὖ
617
mvp-comment-305-1
μή τοι θυραίαν γ’
618
mvp-comment-305-2
αἰσχύνειν φίλους
619
mvp-comment-306-1
καίτοι
620
mvp-comment-306-2
δὴ
621
πολλούς
622
mvp-comment-306-3
ἐξεῖπάς με … ὡς
623
mvp-comment-306-4
θρασεῖα
624
τραχεῖα
625
mvp-comment-306-5
ἄρχω
626
mvp-comment-307-1
ὕβριν … οὐκ ἔχω
627
κακῶς κλύουσα
628
mvp-comment-308-1
πατὴρ γάρ
629
mvp-comment-308-2
πρόσχημα
630
mvp-comment-309-1
ἡ γὰρ Δίκη
631
mvp-comment-310-1
ᾗ χρῆν σ’ ἀρήγειν
632
mvp-comment-311-1
The order of words in the MSS.,
ἐπεὶ πατὴρ οὗτος σός
, is probably right; the words would then fall from her with a certain deliberate bitterness.
Cp. 542
:
Ant. 44
ἦ γὰρ νοεῖς θάπτειν σθ’
(n.):
Ph. 101
λέγω σ’ ἐγὼ δόλῳ Φιλοκτήτην λαβεῖν
.
mvp-comment-312-1
μοῦνος
633
Ἑλλήνων
634
mvp-comment-312-2
Nauck requires
τὴν αὐτὸς αὑτοῦ
instead of
τὴν σὴν ὅμαιμον
, because Agamemnon's unique crime was the slaughter of his own child: as if the text did not convey this. Clytaemnestra means, ‘while mourning a father, you forget a sister.’
mvp-comment-312-3
532 f. The regular mode of expression would be,
οὐκ ἴσον λύπης καμὼν ἐμοί, ὁ σπείρας τῇ τικτούσῃ
. But, having written
ὅτ’ ἔσπειρε
, the poet explains
ἐμοί
by repeating the comparison in a new form,
ὥσπερ ἡ τίκτουσ’ ἐγώ
. (For
ὡς
or
ὥσπερ
after
ἴσος
, cp.
Lys. or. 19 § 36
ἡγοῦντο... τὰ ἐκεῖ...εἶναι ἴσα ὥσπερ τὰ ἐνθάδε
.) Those who reject v. 533 omit to notice that, without it, the words
οὐκ ἴσον καμὼν ἐμοί
would be unintelligible. Cp.
Aesch.
Ag. 1417
ἔθυσεν αὑτοῦ παῖδα, φιλτάτην ἐμοὶ
|
ὠδῖν’
.
mvp-comment-312-4
This assertion of the mother's superior claim is a counterpart to the doctrine of Athena in
Aesch.
Eum. 658
f.,
οὐκ ἔστι μήτηρ ἡ κεκλημένου τέκνου
|
τοκεύς, τροφὸς δὲ κύματος νεοσπόρου
. Cp. above,
Aesch. Eum. 366
n.
mvp-comment-313-1
τοῦ χάριν, τίνων
635
mvp-comment-313-2
The alternative, which most editors have preferred, is to take
τίνων
as the participle. But there is an insuperable objection to this, which seems to have escaped notice. The words,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could mean only, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
for what?’ They could not mean, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
to whom?’ The latter would be
τῷ χάριν τίνων
; See (
e.g.)
Aesch.
P. V. 985
καὶ μὴν ὀφείλων ἂν τίνοιμ’ αὐτῷ χάριν
:
Aesch.
Ag. 821
τούτων θεοῖσι χρὴ πολύμνηστον χάριν
|
τίνειν
. Hence the question,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could not possibly be answered by
Ἀργείων
. For, evidently, the latter word could not mean, (‘for a benefit conferred by) the Greeks.’ A scholiast in the Baroccian MS. (cr. n. on 545), who explains
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
by
τίνος χάριν ἀποδιδούς
, plainly meant, ‘showing gratitude for what?’—and his paraphrase was correct; only he overlooked the context.
mvp-comment-314-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ μετῆν
636
mvp-comment-315-1
ἀλλ’ ἀντ’ ἀδελφοῦ δῆτα
637
κτανὼν
638
mvp-comment-315-2
ἀντὶ ἀδελφοῦ
639
mvp-comment-315-3
τἄμ’
640
mvp-comment-316-1
παῖδες … διπλοῖ
641
mvp-comment-316-2
540 f. Nauck would prefer a single verse in place of these two, viz.
οὓς Ἰφιγενείας εἰκὸς ἦν θνῄσκειν πάρος
.
mvp-comment-317-1
ἢ
642
mvp-comment-317-2
ἢ τῶν ἐμῶν Ἅιδης
643
mvp-comment-318-1
δαίσασθαι
644
mvp-comment-318-2
The conj.
λῄσασθαι
645
mvp-comment-319-1
πανώλει
646
mvp-comment-319-2
παρεῖτο
647
mvp-comment-319-3
The sense does not absolutely require us to take
Μενέλεω δ’
648
mvp-comment-320-1
ἀβούλου
649
mvp-comment-320-2
κακοῦ γνώμην
650
mvp-comment-321-1
δοκῶ μέν
651
mvp-comment-321-2
εἰ καὶ
652
mvp-comment-322-1
εἰ φωνὴν λάβοι
653
mvp-comment-323-1
τοῖς πεπραγμένοις
654
mvp-comment-324-1
γνώμην δικαίαν σχοῦσα
655
mvp-comment-325-1
ἐρεῖς μὲν οὐχὶ
656
ἐρεῖς
657
ἐρεῖς … μ’ ὡς
658
mvp-comment-325-2
ἄρξασά τι λυπηρὸν
659
mvp-comment-325-3
τάδ’ ἐξήκους’
660
mvp-comment-326-1
τοῦ τεθνηκότος θ’ ὕπερ
661
mvp-comment-327-1
καὶ μὴν
662
mvp-comment-327-2
λόγους ἐξῆρχές με
663
mvp-comment-328-1
Clytaemnestra has argued that she was justified in slaying Agamemnon, because he had slain Iphigeneia. The topics of Electra's reply are as follows.
mvp-comment-328-2
(1) 558—562. The wife who slew her husband would be a criminal, even if the motive had been just retribution; but the real motive was her love for Aegisthus. (2) 563—576. Agamemnon was not a free agent in slaying Iphigeneia; the act was forced upon him by Artemis. (3) 577—583. Suppose, however, that he was a free agent, and wished to please his brother; still she was not justified in taking his life. (4) 584—594. And in any case her plea does not excuse her for living with the man who helped to slay her husband.—The speech then closes in a strain of reproach and defiance (595 —609).
mvp-comment-328-3
καὶ δὴ λέγω σοι
664
πατέρα
665
φὴς
666
mvp-comment-329-1
εἴτ’ οὖν … εἴτε
667
mvp-comment-329-2
λέξω
668
δείξω
669
mvp-comment-330-1
ὡς οὐ δίκῃ γ’
670
ἔσπασεν
671
πειθὼ
672
mvp-comment-331-1
κυναγὸν
673
mvp-comment-331-2
ποινὰς
674
mvp-comment-331-3
τὰ πολλὰ πνεύματ’ ἔσχ’
675
τὰ πολλὰ
676
ἔσχε
677
mvp-comment-331-4
Acc. to Aesch. (
Aesch.
Ag. 149
f.,
Aesch. Ag. 192
), the Greeks were detained by
adverse winds, blowing from the N.E. : and this seems to have been the account given in the
Cypria (
c. 776 B.C.), Proclus
Chrest. p. 455:
ἐπέσχεν αὐτοὺς τοῦ πλοῦ χειμῶνας ἐπιπέμπουσα
. But other authorities speak of a
calm. Thus
I. A. 9 ff.
οὔκουν φθόγγος γ’ οὔτ’ ὀρνίθων
|
οὔτε θαλάσσης· σιγαὶ δ’ ἀνέμων
|
τόνδε κατ’ Εὔριπον ἔχουσιν
. Schol.
Eur.
Or. 647
ἐπειράθη τῆς θεοῦ ὀργιζομένης καὶ κατεχούσης τοὺς ἀνέμους
. Tzetzes on Lycophron 183
χολωθεῖσα δ’ ἐπὶ τούτῳ ἡ θεὸς τοὺς ἀνέμους κατέσχεν
. Ovid (
Met. 13. 183
) combines both versions:
exspectata diu, nulla aut contraria classi | Flamina sunt.
mvp-comment-331-5
It has been objected that vessels provided with oars need not have been detained by a calm. But the ships of the Greek fleet were not light craft. Each carried from 50 to 120 armed men, besides
σκεύη πολεμικά
: and the warriors were also the rowers (cp.
Thuc. 1. 10
). It is intelligible, then, that they should await the aid of wind before attempting the passage of the Aegaean. We must remember, too, the strong and shifting currents in the Euripus (
στονόεντα πορθμόν
,
Soph.
Ant. 1145
:
παλιρρόχθοις ἐν Αὐλίδος τόποις
,
Aesch.
Ag. 191
).
mvp-comment-331-6
We cannot well render:—(1)‘He
suffered those tedious winds,’—supplying
ὁ πατήρ
from v. 558. Nor: (2) ‘She
directed those tedious winds at Aulis,’—a version which would at least require
ἐπ’ Αὐλίδι
. Cp.
Ph. 1119
ἔχε
|
δύσποτμον ἀρὰν ἐπ’ ἄλλοις
.
mvp-comment-331-7
The conjecture
πλοῖα
678
mvp-comment-331-8
Αὐλίδι
679
mvp-comment-332-1
ἢ )γὼ φράσω
680
κείνης
681
mvp-comment-333-1
ὡς ἐγὼ κλύω
682
mvp-comment-333-2
θεᾶς … κατ’ ἄλσος
683
mvp-comment-333-3
παίζων
684
mvp-comment-333-4
ποδοῖν
685
mvp-comment-334-1
ἔλαφον
686
mvp-comment-334-2
στικτὸν
687
mvp-comment-334-3
κεράστην
688
mvp-comment-334-4
οὗ κατὰ σφαγὰς
689
mvp-comment-335-1
ἐκκομπάσας ἔπος τι τυγχάνει
690
βαλών
691
mvp-comment-335-2
This is the reason against taking
τυγχάνει
with
βαλών
, as=‘he shoots and hits’; cp.
Il. 15. 581
θηρητὴρ ἐτύχησε βαλών
:
Her. 3. 35
εἰ...τοῦ παιδὸς...βαλὼν τύχοιμι
. The vaunt must then
precede the hit.
mvp-comment-335-3
Others take
βαλὼν
692
ἔπος
693
mvp-comment-335-4
Monk, with Musgrave, took
σφαγὰς
694
mvp-comment-336-1
ἐκ τοῦδε
695
mvp-comment-336-2
μηνίσασα
696
mvp-comment-336-3
Λητῴα κόρη
697
mvp-comment-337-1
ὡς
698
ἀντίσταθμον
699
mvp-comment-337-2
ἐκθύσειε
700
mvp-comment-338-1
ὧδ’ ἦν
701
mvp-comment-338-2
τὰ … θύματ’
702
mvp-comment-338-3
λύσις
703
mvp-comment-338-4
πρὸς οἶκον
704
mvp-comment-339-1
πολλὰ
705
mvp-comment-339-2
ἀντιβὰς
706
mvp-comment-339-3
μόλις
707
mvp-comment-340-1
εἰ δ’ οὖν
708
mvp-comment-340-2
ἐρῶ γὰρ καὶ τὸ σόν
709
mvp-comment-341-1
τούτου … οὕνεκ’
710
mvp-comment-341-2
νόμῳ
711
mvp-comment-342-1
ὅρα
712
μὴ … τιθῇς
713
τίθης
714
mvp-comment-342-2
Here, either
τίθης
or
τιθῇς
would be suitable. (1) With
τίθης
:—‘See that, in making this rule, you
are not making woe for yourself.’ This means that to make the rule (as she is doing) is at once (logically) to make the woe. (2) With
τιθῇς
: —‘See
lest, in making this rule, you
make woe for yourself’:
i.e., the rule may have the woe as a consequence. The woe is a future contingency (583
εἰ δίκης γε τυγχάνοις
), against which Electra warns her. On the whole, I now prefer
τιθῇς
.
Cp. 1003
ὅρα κακῶς πράσσοντε μὴ μείζω κακὰ
|
κτησώμεθ’
: fr. 82
ἀλλ’ ὅρα μὴ κρεῖσσον ᾖ
.
mvp-comment-342-3
τιθεῖσα … νόμον
715
mvp-comment-343-1
εἰ γὰρ κτενοῦμεν
716
mvp-comment-343-2
πρώτη
717
mvp-comment-344-1
εἰσόρα
718
mvp-comment-344-2
οὐκ οὖσαν
719
mvp-comment-344-3
τίθης
720
mvp-comment-344-4
εἰ … θέλεις
721
mvp-comment-345-1
τῷ παλαμναίῳ
722
mvp-comment-345-2
πρόσθεν ἐξαπώλεσας
723
mvp-comment-346-1
παιδοποιεῖς
724
mvp-comment-346-2
Erigonè, daughter of Aegisthus and Clytaemnestra (Tzetzes on
Lyc. 1374
), was mentioned by the early cyclic poet Cinaethon (
Paus. 2. 18. 6
), and was the theme of Sophocles in his
Ἠριγόνη
. Hyginus (
Hyg.
Fab. 122
) notices a son of Aegisthus named Aletes, who gives his name to a play by Sophocles, but does not record the mother: see p. xliii note 4.
mvp-comment-346-3
εὐσεβεῖς
725
mvp-comment-346-4
κἀξ εὐσεβῶν
726
mvp-comment-346-5
By
τοὺς...πρόσθεν εὐσεβεῖς
Electra means Orestes and herself. Both are ‘cast out’ of their just rights. Cp.
O.T. 611
φίλον ...ἐσθλὸν ἐκβαλεῖν
.
Eur.
El. 62
τεκοῦσα δ’ ἄλλους παῖδας Αἰγίσθῳ πάρα
|
πάρεργ’ Ὀρέστην κἀμὲ ποιεῖται δόμων.
mvp-comment-346-6
βλαστόντας
727
mvp-comment-346-7
ἐκβαλοῦσ’ ἔχεις
728
mvp-comment-347-1
πῶς ταῦτ’ ἐπαινέσαιμ’ ἄν
729
mvp-comment-347-2
ἢ
730
ἦ
731
καὶ τοῦτ’
732
ἄποινα
733
mvp-comment-348-1
αἰσχρῶς δ’
734
δ’
735
mvp-comment-348-2
ἐάν περ καὶ λέγῃς
736
mvp-comment-348-3
ἐχθροῖς γαμεῖσθαι
737
mvp-comment-348-4
These two verses, though not indispensable, seem genuine. Were they omitted, the transition from 592 to 595 would be somewhat abrupt.
mvp-comment-349-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ γὰρ
738
mvp-comment-349-2
πᾶσαν ἵης γλῶσσαν
739
mvp-comment-350-1
κακοστομοῦμεν
740
mvp-comment-350-2
καί σ’ ἔγωγε δεσπότιν
741
mvp-comment-350-3
εἰς ἡμᾶς
742
ἣ
743
mvp-comment-351-1
βίον μοχθηρόν
744
mvp-comment-351-2
ἔκ τε σοῦ
745
κακοῖς … ξυνοῦσα
746
mvp-comment-351-3
συννόμου
747
mvp-comment-352-1
ὁ δ’ ἄλλος
748
mvp-comment-352-2
χεῖρα σὴν
749
mvp-comment-352-3
τρίβει βίον
750
mvp-comment-352-4
603 The reason for writing
δή με σοὶ
751
δή μέ σοι
752
mvp-comment-352-5
μιάστορα
753
mvp-comment-353-1
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκα
754
mvp-comment-354-1
εἰς ἅπαντας
755
mvp-comment-354-2
χρῇς
756
mvp-comment-354-3
στόμαργον
757
mvp-comment-355-1
τῶνδε τῶν ἔ|ργων ἴδρις
758
mvp-comment-355-2
σχεδόν τι
759
mvp-comment-355-3
οὐ καταισχύνω
760
mvp-comment-356-1
ὁρῶ μένος πνέουσαν
761
μένος πνέουσαν
762
mvp-comment-356-2
σὺν δίκῃ ξύνεστι
763
mvp-comment-356-3
Other interpretations are:—(1) ‘I see that Electra is wroth; but as to whether she is in the right, I see no concern (anywhere),’—a timid way of saying that
Clytaemnestra shows no such concern. So the schol. (2) ‘I see that Clytaemnestra is angry, but not that she cares whether she is right’:—an inference from some gesture. Both these versions rely on the fact that
φροντίδος
(612) is plainly an echo of
φροντίδ’
(611). But: (
a) it does not follow that
φροντίδ’
is not
Electra's thought. (
b) It is surely clear that
πνέουσαν
must be Electra; and (
c) as in
Ant. 471
f., the second clause naturally refers to the same person.
mvp-comment-357-1
ποίας δ’ ἐμοὶ δεῖ
764
ἐμοὶ
765
μοι
766
δεῖ
767
mvp-comment-357-2
Others understand: (1) ‘If Electra has no consideration for justice, why should I have any consideration for her,—
i.e., show her any tenderness?’ Or: (2) ‘If she heeds not justice, why should I heed her?’ Neither view seems well suited to the context.
mvp-comment-358-1
καὶ ταῦτα
768
mvp-comment-358-2
τηλικοῦτος
769
mvp-comment-358-3
ἆρα
770
mvp-comment-358-4
χωρεῖν ἂν
771
εἰς πᾶν ἔργον
772
mvp-comment-359-1
εὖ νυν ἐπίστω
773
mvp-comment-359-2
ἔξωρα
774
mvp-comment-359-3
προσεικότα
775
mvp-comment-360-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
776
mvp-comment-360-2
ἡ … ἐκ σοῦ δυσμένεια
777
mvp-comment-360-3
ἐξαναγκάζει
778
αἰσχροῖς
779
mvp-comment-360-4
622 f. The word
θρέμμα
780
mvp-comment-360-5
ἦ σ’ ἐγὼ
781
mvp-comment-361-1
νιν
782
mvp-comment-361-2
εὑρίσκεται
783
mvp-comment-361-3
Cp. Milton,
Apology for Smectymnuus (in his
Prose Works, ed. Symmons, vol. I. p. 236): ‘I might also tell them [the prelates], what Electra in Sophocles, a wise virgin, answered her wicked mother, who thought herself too violently reproved by her the daughter: ‘'
Tis you that say it,
not I; you do the deeds, |
And your ungodly deeds find me the words.’’
mvp-comment-362-1
οὐ μὰ
784
mvp-comment-362-2
δέσποιναν
785
mvp-comment-362-3
Ἄρτεμιν
786
mvp-comment-362-4
θράσους τοῦδ’ οὐκ ἀλύξεις
787
μόλῃ
788
mvp-comment-363-1
ὁρᾷς
789
mvp-comment-363-2
ἐκφέρει
790
mvp-comment-363-3
The
v. l.
παρεῖσα
791
mvp-comment-364-1
οὐδὲ
792
mvp-comment-364-2
ὑπ’ εὐφήμου βοῆς
793
mvp-comment-364-3
ἐπειδὴ σοί γ’
794
mvp-comment-364-4
πᾶν λέγειν
795
mvp-comment-365-1
κελεύω
796
mvp-comment-365-2
τοὐμὸν στόμ’
797
mvp-comment-365-3
634 f. An altar, and probably an image, of Apollo stand before the palace. The attendant of Clytaemnestra carries offerings of various fruits, which she is now commanded to
raise, as with a gesture of solemn oblation (
ἔπαιρε
798
mvp-comment-365-4
ἡ παροῦσά μοι
799
mvp-comment-365-5
θύματα … πάγκαρπα
800
mvp-comment-366-1
λυτηρίους … δειμάτων
801
mvp-comment-366-2
ἀνάσχω
802
mvp-comment-367-1
κλύοις ἂν
803
mvp-comment-367-2
προστατήριε
804
mvp-comment-368-1
κεκρυμμένην
805
mvp-comment-368-2
οὐ γὰρ ἐν φίλοις
806
mvp-comment-369-1
πρὸς φῶς
807
mvp-comment-370-1
πολυγλώσσῳ
808
mvp-comment-370-2
σπείρῃ
809
mvp-comment-370-3
ματαίαν
810
mvp-comment-371-1
ὧδ’
811
mvp-comment-372-1
γὰρ
812
mvp-comment-372-2
δισσῶν ὀνείρων
813
mvp-comment-372-3
Jacobs Fr.(
ap. Wunder) understood, ‘
two dreams,’—as if Clyt.'s vision consisted of two parts,—the return of Agamemnon, and the growth from the sceptre (417—423). This seems forced. Still less can we assume that there was some second dream which Clyt. did not relate even to the Sun-god (425).
mvp-comment-372-4
Λύκεἰ ἄναξ
814
mvp-comment-373-1
ἐσθλά … ἐχθρά
815
mvp-comment-373-2
Cp.
Aesch.
Pers. 217
, where the Chorus are advising Atossa how to propitiate the gods after her dream:
εἴ τι φλαῦρον εἶδες, αἰτοῦ τῶνδ’ ἀποτροπὴν τελεῖν
, |
τὰ δ’ ἀγάθ’ ἐκτελῆ γενέσθαι σοί τε καὶ τέκνῳ σέθεν κ.τ.λ.
mvp-comment-373-3
ἔμπαλιν μέθες
816
mvp-comment-374-1
εἴ τινες
817
mvp-comment-375-1
ἀλλ’ ὧδε
818
mvp-comment-375-2
ἀβλαβεῖ βίῳ
819
mvp-comment-376-1
δόμους
820
mvp-comment-376-2
ἀμφέπειν
821
mvp-comment-376-3
φίλοισι
822
mvp-comment-377-1
εὐημεροῦσαν
823
mvp-comment-377-2
καὶ τέκνων
824
ὅσων
825
mvp-comment-377-3
We might also take
τέκνων
as standing, by attraction, for
τέκνοις
. When the antecedent is thus attracted, it usually comes after the relative (
O.C. 56); but sometimes precedes it, as in
Tr. 151
f.
τότ’ ἄν τις εἰσίδοιτο
... | ...
κακοῖσιν
(for
κακά
)
ο<*>ς ἐγὼ βαρύνομαι
. In examples of the latter kind, however, the acc. (and not, as it would be here, the dat.) is elsewhere the case attracted. In favour of taking
τέκνων
as partitive, it may be added that this suits the distinction between two groups of
τέκνα
. By
ὅσων
she means Chrysothemis, Iphianassa, and the offspring o<*> her union with Aegisthus (157; 589).
mvp-comment-377-4
ἐμοὶ … πρόσεστιν
826
mvp-comment-378-1
πᾶσιν ἡμῖν
827
mvp-comment-379-1
τὰ δ’ ἄλλα πάντα
828
mvp-comment-379-2
660 Following the directions given in vv. 39 ff., the Paedagogus now appears as a
ξένος Φωκεύς
. Cp.
O.T. 924 ff., where the messenger from Corinth presents himself to Iocasta and the Chorus.
mvp-comment-379-3
πῶς ἂν εἰδείην
829
mvp-comment-380-1
ἦ καὶ
830
mvp-comment-380-2
ἐπεικάζων κυρῶ
831
mvp-comment-380-3
πρέπ<*> γὰρ
832
mvp-comment-381-1
μάλιστα πάντων
833
mvp-comment-381-2
ἥδε σοι κείνη πάρα
834
mvp-comment-381-3
666 f. The
ὦ
835
χαῖρε
836
mvp-comment-382-1
ἐδεξάμην τὸ ῥηθέν
837
mvp-comment-382-2
Instant recognition of an utterance as well-omened was a way of appropriating the omen. The proper formula was
δέχομαι τὸν οἰωνόν
or
τὸν ὄρνιν
(
Her. 9. 91
;
Ar.
Pl. 63
). But
δέχομαι
alone was enough (
Xen.
An. 1. 8. 17
: cp.
Aesch.
Ag. 1653
δεχομένοις λέγεις θανεῖν σε
). The phrase used here recurs in
Her. 8. 114
δεξάμενος τὸ ῥηθὲν ἀπαλλάσσετο
: cp. also
Eur.
El. 622
προσηκάμην τὸ ῥηθέν
.
mvp-comment-382-3
εἰδέναι … σου
838
mvp-comment-383-1
Φανοτεὺς
839
mvp-comment-383-2
πρᾶγμα πορσύνων μέγα
840
mvp-comment-384-1
τὸ ποῖον
841
mvp-comment-385-1
ἐν βραχεῖ ξυνθεὶς
842
mvp-comment-386-1
τί φής, τί φής
843
ξεῖνε
844
mvp-comment-386-2
ταύτης
845
mvp-comment-387-1
νῦν τε καὶ πάλαι
846
mvp-comment-388-1
οὐδέν εἰμ’ ἔτι
847
mvp-comment-389-1
τὰ σαυτῆς πρᾶσς’
848
mvp-comment-389-2
διόλλυται
849