mvp-comment-51-1
ὑπολειφθῇ
1
ᾔσθου
2
mvp-comment-52-1
τὰ … παννυχίδων
3
ξυνίσας’
4
ὅσα … θρηνῶ
5
mvp-comment-52-2
ἤδη
6
mvp-comment-52-3
The MS.
οἴκων
7
λέκτρων
8
μογερῶν
9
mvp-comment-53-1
ὅσα τὸν δύστηνον
10
mvp-comment-54-1
κατὰ μὲν βάρβαρον αἶαν
11
ἐξένισεν
12
mvp-comment-55-1
Ἄρης
13
mvp-comment-55-2
ἐξένισεν
14
mvp-comment-56-1
κοινολεχὴς
15
mvp-comment-57-1
ὅπως δρῦν ὑλοτόμοι
16
mvp-comment-57-2
σχίζουσι
17
mvp-comment-57-3
κάρα
18
mvp-comment-57-4
πέλεκει
19
mvp-comment-58-1
ἄλλης
20
mvp-comment-58-2
φέρεται
21
mvp-comment-58-3
The deletion of the words
ἀπ’ ἄλλης
22
ἢ )μοῦ
23
mvp-comment-59-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ μὲν δὴ
24
mvp-comment-60-1
ἄστρων
25
mvp-comment-60-2
Others read,
ἔστ’ ἂν λεύσσω παμφεγγεῖς
|
ῥιπάς, λεύσσω δὲ τόδ’ ἦμαρ
, omitting
ἄστρων
. But
παμφεγγεῖς ῥιπάς
, without
ἄστρων
, would not suffice to denote starlight. If, again, the phrase is taken to denote the
sun's rays (as Monk proposes,
Mus. Crit. I. p. 67), then
λεύσσω δὲ τόδ’ ἦμαρ
becomes weak. Further, the preceding context, in which she has spoken of her laments
at night (92) and at morning, clearly suggests that the sense here is, ‘so long as I look on the
stars or on the
sun.’
mvp-comment-61-1
μὴ οὐ
26
mvp-comment-61-2
τεκνολέτειῤ
27
mvp-comment-62-1
ἐπὶ κωκυτῷ
28
mvp-comment-62-2
ἠχὼ
29
mvp-comment-63-1
Electra invokes, (1) the house of Hades and his bride Persephone, in which the spirit of Agamemnon now dwells; (2) Hermes, who, as
ψυχοπομπός
, conducted him thither,—and who will also guide the avengers on their way (1395 f.); (3)
Ἀρά
, the imprecation uttered by the victim upon his murderers,—the personified curse, here conceived as a supernatural power (
πότνια
), which calls the Erinyes into action; and (4) the Erinyes themselves.
mvp-comment-63-2
Ἀΐδου
30
mvp-comment-64-1
ὦ χθόνἰ Ἑρμῆ
31
mvp-comment-64-2
Ἀρά
32
mvp-comment-64-3
πότνια
33
mvp-comment-65-1
σεμναὶ
34
mvp-comment-65-2
θεῶν παῖδες
35
mvp-comment-66-1
ὁρᾶθ’
36
mvp-comment-67-1
αἳ τοὺς εὐνὰς ὑποκλεπτομένους
37
mvp-comment-67-2
These much-impugned words appear genuine. The murder has been prompted by the guilty love:
δόλος ἦν ὁ φράσας, ἔρος ὁ κτείνας
(197). In Electra's thought, they are inseparable. The allusion to the love
follows the reference to the murder, because she regards it as the crowning outrage (271
τὴν τελευταίαν ὕβριν
) that Clytaemnestra still lives with Aegisthus. Bloodshed was not the only sin which the Erinyes punished. They were the embodied sanctions of natural law, and every crime against the family came within their cognisance. (See
Introd. to Homer, p. 51, § 13.) Indeed, Electra herself speaks of the unhallowed union as a special provocation to those Avengers: 275 f.
ἡ δ’ ὧδε τλήμων ὥστε τῷ μιάστορι
|
ξύνεστ’, Ἐρινὺν οὔτιν’ ἐκφοβουμένη
.
mvp-comment-68-1
τείσασθε
38
mvp-comment-69-1
ἡμετέρου
39
μοι
40
mvp-comment-69-2
καί μοι
41
mvp-comment-70-1
ἄγειν
42
mvp-comment-70-2
σωκῶ
43
mvp-comment-71-1
δυστανοτάτας
44
mvp-comment-72-1
τάκεις … οἰμωγὰν
45
mvp-comment-72-2
ἀκόρεστον
46
mvp-comment-72-3
τὸν πάλαι
47
mvp-comment-72-4
πάλαι
48
ἐκ
49
mvp-comment-72-5
ἀθεώτατα
50
mvp-comment-72-6
κακᾷ … χειρὶ πρόδοτον
51
χειρὶ
52
mvp-comment-72-7
ὡς
53
mvp-comment-72-8
ὁ τάδε πορὼν
54
mvp-comment-72-9
εἴ μοι θέμις
55
mvp-comment-73-1
γενέθλα
56
mvp-comment-73-2
γενναίων
57
mvp-comment-73-3
παραμύθ‐
58
ιον
59
mvp-comment-74-1
ξυνίημι
60
mvp-comment-74-2
τάδ’
61
mvp-comment-75-1
φυγγάνει
62
mvp-comment-75-2
οὐδ’ ἐθέλω
63
mvp-comment-76-1
μὴ οὐ
64
mvp-comment-76-2
τὸν ἐμὸν … πατέρ’ ἄθλιον
65
mvp-comment-77-1
παντοίας
66
mvp-comment-77-2
Electra's lyrics contain some Doricisms (129, 146 f., etc.): but it is best to retain
φιλότητος
, with the MSS. The form in
η
was so familiar through Homer that it may have been preferred to
φιλότατος
even in lyrics.
Cp. 236
.
mvp-comment-78-1
ἀλύειν
67
mvp-comment-79-1
αἰαῖ, ἱκνοῦμαι
68
mvp-comment-80-1
τόν γ’ ἐξ Ἀΐδα … λίμνας
69
mvp-comment-80-2
παγκοίνου
70
mvp-comment-80-3
ἀνστάσεις
71
mvp-comment-81-1
οὔτε †γόοις οὔτε λιταῖσιν
72
οὔτε γόοισιν οὔτ’ εὐχαῖς
73
mvp-comment-82-1
For the repetition of
ἀλλά
74
mvp-comment-82-2
ἀπὸ τῶν μετρίων
75
mvp-comment-82-3
ἀμήχανον
76
mvp-comment-82-4
ο=ιόλλυσαι
77
mvp-comment-83-1
ἐν οἷς
78
mvp-comment-83-2
ἀνάλυσις … κακῶν
79
mvp-comment-83-3
τί μοι
80
mvp-comment-84-1
νήπιος
81
mvp-comment-84-2
γονέων
82
mvp-comment-85-1
ἐμέ γ’ … ἄραρεν
83
mvp-comment-85-2
φρένας
84
mvp-comment-86-1
αἰὲν Ἴτυν
85
mvp-comment-87-1
ὄρνις
86
mvp-comment-87-2
ἀτυζομένα
87
mvp-comment-87-3
Διὸς ἄγγελος
88
mvp-comment-88-1
Νιόβα, σὲ δ’
89
θεόν
90
mvp-comment-88-2
ἅτ’
91
mvp-comment-88-3
ἐν τάφῳ πετραίῳ
92
mvp-comment-89-1
αἰεὶ
93
mvp-comment-90-1
οὔτοι σοὶ μούνᾳ
94
mvp-comment-91-1
πρὸς ὅ τι
95
mvp-comment-91-2
τῶν ἔνδον εἶ περισσά
96
mvp-comment-92-1
οἷς
97
τῶν ἔνδον
98
mvp-comment-92-2
ὁμόθεν
99
γονᾷ ξύναιμος
100
mvp-comment-93-1
οἵα Χρ. ζώει
101
mvp-comment-93-2
Acc. to the version followed by Sophocles, Agamemnon had four daughters, Iphigeneia, Electra, Chrysothemis, Iphianassa. This was the account given in the cyclic
Κύπρια ἔπη
, as the schol. here mentions; a poem of which there is another trace in this play (566 ff.). Sophocles wrote an
Ἰφιγένεια
(
Nauck,
frag. Soph. 284—292
); but her name is not mentioned in the reference to her death below (530—594). In
Il. 9. 145
Agamemnon has three daughters, Chrysothemis, Laodicè, Iphianassa: Homer does not mention Iphigeneia. Lucretius gives the name of Iphianassa to the victim at Aulis (
1. 85
).
mvp-comment-93-3
ζώει
102
mvp-comment-93-4
καὶ Ἰφιάνασσα
103
mvp-comment-94-1
ἀχέων
104
mvp-comment-94-2
Hermann, taking
ἀχέων
105
κρυπτᾷ
106
mvp-comment-95-1
ὄλβιος, ὃν
107
mvp-comment-95-2
For the simple
ὅς
, instead of
ὅς γε
or
ὅστις
, with causal force, cp. below, 188, 261, 959;
O.T. 817.
mvp-comment-96-1
δέξεται εὐπατρίδαν
108
mvp-comment-96-2
Διὸς εὔφρονι
109
βήματι
110
mvp-comment-96-3
γᾶν
111
γᾶ
112
mvp-comment-96-4
Ὀρέσταν
113
ὃν
114
mvp-comment-97-1
ἀκάματα
115
mvp-comment-97-2
ἀνύμφευτος
116
ἄτεκνος
117
mvp-comment-97-3
οἰχνῶ
118
mvp-comment-98-1
δάκρυσι μυδαλέα
119
mvp-comment-98-2
τὸν ἀνήνυτον
120
mvp-comment-98-3
οἶτον ἔχουσα
121
mvp-comment-99-1
ὧν τ’ ἔπαθ’
122
ὧν τ’ ἐδάη
123
mvp-comment-99-2
Wecklein, reading
ἐδάην
, explains,— ‘what I have heard from him,’—viz., his promises of coming.
mvp-comment-99-3
τί γὰρ … ἀγγελίας
124
mvp-comment-99-4
ἀπατώμενον
125
τί … οὐκ
126
mvp-comment-99-5
Herwerden's
οὐχί μοι
127
οὐκ ἐμοί
128
ὁ δέ
129
mvp-comment-100-1
ποθεῖ, ποθῶν δ’
130
mvp-comment-101-1
ἔτι μέγας οὐρανῷ
131
ἐν
132
mvp-comment-102-1
τὸν ὑπεραλγῆ
133
mvp-comment-102-2
νέμουσα
134
mvp-comment-103-1
μήτε ὑπεράχθεο
135
οἷς
136
mvp-comment-104-1
εὐμαρὴς θεός
137
θεός
138
mvp-comment-105-1
οὔτε γὰρ
139
mvp-comment-105-2
Κρῖσαν
140
mvp-comment-105-3
Crisa stood about two miles W.S.W. of Delphi, on a spur of Parnassus, at the lower outlet of the gorge through which the river Pleistus issues into the plain. The
Iliad mentions ‘sacred Crisa’ (
ζαθέην
, 2. 520). But the Homeric Hymn to the Pythian Apollo is the best witness to its ancient power. There, just as here, the name
Κρῖσα
includes the land which stretches southward from the town to its harbour on the ‘wide gulf’ (vv. 253— 261). We need not, then, read
Κρίσᾳ
or
Κρίσας
. Crisa was the earliest seat of trade on the western sea; Delphi, when first founded, was merely a sanctuary in its territory. Pindar recalls the old prominence of its name when he describes a Pythian victory as won
Κρισαίαις ἐνὶ πτυχαῖς
(
P. 6. 18).
mvp-comment-105-4
Cirrha, a town of much later date, was the port of Crisa on the gulf. About 585 B.C., the Delphians, aided by Cleisthenes of Sicyon and his allies, succeeded, after a long struggle, in humbling Crisa and destroying Cirrha. The Crisaean plain was then devoted to Apollo, whose domain was thus extended from his temple to the coast. When Sophocles wrote, that ground was still a
βούνομος ἀκτή
, inviolable by plough or spade. It was not till the middle of the next century that the alleged encroachments of Amphissa on the
ἱερὰ χώρα
gave a pretext for war to the Amphictyons (355 B.C.).
mvp-comment-105-5
Ulrichs (
Reisen in Griechenland) was the first to place the relations of Crisa and Cirrha in a clear light. Strabo correctly describes the site of Cirrha, but erroneously places Crisa to the east of it (9. p. 418).
mvp-comment-106-1
βούνομον
141
βουνόμον
142
mvp-comment-106-2
βούνομον ἀκτὰν
143
Κρῖσαν
144
mvp-comment-107-1
ἀπερίτροπος
145
mvp-comment-108-1
παρὰ τὸν Ἀχέροντα
146
ἀνάσσων
147
θεὸς
148
mvp-comment-109-1
μὲν
149
mvp-comment-109-2
ὁ πολὺς … βίοτος
150
mvp-comment-109-3
ἀνέλπιστος
151
mvp-comment-109-4
187 *
τεκέων
. I am now satisfied that this is a true correction of
τοκέων
152
ἅτις
153
τοκέων
154
mvp-comment-110-1
ἁπερεί
155
mvp-comment-110-2
ἔποικος
156
mvp-comment-111-1
οἰκονομῶ θαλάμους
157
mvp-comment-112-1
ἀεικεῖ σὺν στολᾷ
158
mvp-comment-113-1
κεναῖς δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
159
ἀμφίσταμαι
160
mvp-comment-113-2
Hartung, reading
κενὰ δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
, takes the sense to be that she stands ‘hungry’ by the tables at which the others feast. But
κενή
as=
νῆστις
would be neither usual nor elegant.
mvp-comment-114-1
Hitherto the Chorus have offered consolation or counsel. At v. 213 they return to that strain. But here, moved by Electra's misery, they join with her in bewailing its cause.
mvp-comment-114-2
οἰκτρὰ μὲν … πλαγά
161
κοίταις
162
οἰκτρὰ … αὐδὰ
163
mvp-comment-114-3
Sophocles, who follows the Homeric story as to the banquet, could not but remember the
οἰκτροτάτην ὄπα
of the dying Cassandra. And this might naturally suggest to him that other
οἰκτρὰ αὐδή
which she had uttered at an earlier moment, immediately after Agamemnon's return,—her presage of his fate, and her own:
Aesch.
Ag. 1072
—1314.
mvp-comment-114-4
The sense then is:—‘There was a voice of lamentation at the return from Troy’; alluding especially to Cassandra's laments, but also, perhaps, to forebodings in the mouth of the people at Mycenae. ‘And there was a voice of lamentation
ἐν κοίταις πατρῴαις
, when thy father lay on the couch at the fatal banquet.’ The ‘voice’ at the banquet is, first, that of the dying Agamemnon; but Sophocles may have thought also of Cassandra's death-cry, which was sounding in the king's ears as he fell.—For other interpretations, see Appendix.
mvp-comment-114-5
νόστοις
164
ἐν
165
mvp-comment-114-6
κοίταις
166
mvp-comment-114-7
ὅτε οἱ
167
σοι
168
ἀνταία
169
mvp-comment-114-8
γενύων
170
mvp-comment-115-1
δόλος … ἔρος
171
mvp-comment-116-1
δεινὰν δεινῶς
172
δεινὰν … μορφάν
173
mvp-comment-116-2
εἴτ’ οὖν … εἴτε
174
βροτῶν
175
mvp-comment-117-1
πλέον … ἐχθίστα
176
mvp-comment-117-2
δὴ
177
mvp-comment-118-1
νὺξ
178
mvp-comment-118-2
δείπνων
179
mvp-comment-119-1
ἄχθη
180
τοῖς
181
θανάτους
182
mvp-comment-119-2
διδύμαιν χειροῖν
183
διδύμοιν
184
mvp-comment-120-1
εἷλον … πρόδοτον
185
mvp-comment-121-1
οἷς
186
mvp-comment-121-2
Ὀλύμπιος
187
mvp-comment-122-1
ποίνιμα
188
mvp-comment-123-1
ἀγλαΐας
189
mvp-comment-123-2
ἀποναίατο
190
mvp-comment-124-1
πόρσω
191
mvp-comment-125-1
γνώμαν ἴσχεις
192
mvp-comment-125-2
ἐξ οἵων
193
mvp-comment-125-3
τὰ παρόντ’
194
mvp-comment-125-4
οἰκείας
195
mvp-comment-126-1
πολύ … τι κακῶν
196
mvp-comment-126-2
ὑπερεκτήσω
197
mvp-comment-127-1
τὰ δὲ
198
οὐκ ἐριστὰ τοῖς δυνατοῖς
199
πλάθειν
200
mvp-comment-127-2
ἐριστά
201
mvp-comment-127-3
πλάθειν
202
mvp-comment-128-1
δεινοῖς ἠναγκάσθην
203
mvp-comment-129-1
ὀργά
204
ἔξοιδ’
205
mvp-comment-130-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
206
mvp-comment-130-2
ἐν … δεινοῖς
207
mvp-comment-130-3
σχήσω
208
mvp-comment-130-4
ταύτας ἄτας
209
mvp-comment-131-1
ὄφρα
210
mvp-comment-131-2
βίος ἔχῃ με
211
σχήσω
212
mvp-comment-132-1
τίνι γάρ … τίνι φρονοῦντι καίρια
213
ἀκούσαιμ’ ἂν πρόσφορον ἔπος
214
τίνι
215
πρόσφορον
216
mvp-comment-132-2
Other explanations are:—(1) Taking the dative with
πρόσφορον
:—‘To what person who feels aright would that word be suitable which I should hear (=which would be said of me)?’ That is: Should I not deserve to incur a censure from which every right-minded person would shrink? Should I not deserve to be called
δυσσεβής
? This seems forced; and it does not well suit
ἔπος
. (2) Taking the dative with
ἀκούσαιμι
:—‘At whose mouth (=
from whom), that thinks aright, could I hear a suitable word of comfort?’ But such a dative seems impossible. In
Il. 16. 515
δύνασαι δὲ σὺ πάντοσ’ ἀκούειν
|
ἀνέρι κηδομένῳ
, the dat. is one of interest, denoting the person whose prayer is heard (‘
for him’); cp.
Il. 5. 115
κλῦθί μοι
: 24. 335
ἔκλυες ᾧ κ’ ἐθέλῃσθα
.
mvp-comment-133-1
ἄνετε
217
mvp-comment-133-2
ἄλυτα
218
mvp-comment-133-3
κεκλήσεται
219
mvp-comment-133-4
231 f. For
ἐκ
220
mvp-comment-133-5
ἀνάριθμος
221
θρήνων
222
mvp-comment-134-1
ἀλλ’ οὖν
223
γε
224
εὐνοίᾳ
225
mvp-comment-135-1
μάτηρ ὡσεί τις
226
mvp-comment-136-1
μὴ τίκτειν
227
mvp-comment-136-2
ἄταν ἄταις
228
mvp-comment-137-1
καὶ τί μέτρον
229
κακότατος
230
mvp-comment-137-2
φέρε
231
mvp-comment-137-3
ἐπὶ τοῖς φθ.
232
mvp-comment-138-1
ἔβλαστ’
233
mvp-comment-139-1
τούτοις
234
mvp-comment-140-1
εἴ τῳ πρόσκειμαι χρηστῷ
235
mvp-comment-141-1
ξυνναίοιμ’
236
mvp-comment-141-2
εὔκηλος
237
mvp-comment-141-3
γονέων
238
ἐκτίμους
239
mvp-comment-141-4
ἐκτίμους ἵσχουσα
240
mvp-comment-141-5
πτέρυγας … γόων
241
mvp-comment-141-6
ὀξυτόνων
242
mvp-comment-142-1
εἰ γὰρ
243
mvp-comment-142-2
γᾶ
244
mvp-comment-142-3
οὐδὲν
245
ὢν
246
εἰ
247
mvp-comment-142-4
Electra is contrasting her father, whose earthly life has been cut short, with his murderers, who survive. But she believes that his spirit lives in the world below, and will be active in aiding the vengeance (453 ff.).
mvp-comment-142-5
πάλιν
248
mvp-comment-142-6
ἀντιφόνους δίκας
249
mvp-comment-143-1
ἔρροι τ’
250
mvp-comment-143-2
αἰδὼς
251
εὐσέβεια
252
mvp-comment-144-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
253
mvp-comment-144-2
καὶ
254
τὸ σὸν … καὶ τοὐμὸν
255
mvp-comment-145-1
νίκα
256
mvp-comment-145-2
ἅμα
257
mvp-comment-146-1
πολλοῖσι θρήνοις
258
mvp-comment-147-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
259
mvp-comment-148-1
ἥτις εὐγενὴς γυνή
260
mvp-comment-149-1
πατρῷα … πήματα
261
mvp-comment-150-1
κατ’ εὐφρόνην
262
mvp-comment-150-2
θάλλοντα
263
mvp-comment-151-1
ᾗ
264
mvp-comment-151-2
πρῶτα μὲν … εἶτα … ἔπειτα
265
ᾗ
266
mvp-comment-151-3
τὰ μητρὸς
267
mvp-comment-151-4
ἔχθιστα συμβέβηκεν
268
mvp-comment-152-1
κἀκ τῶνδ’ ἄρχομαι
269
mvp-comment-153-1
λαβεῖν … τὸ τητᾶσθαι
270
mvp-comment-154-1
ποίας
271
δοκεῖς
272
mvp-comment-155-1
ἴδω
273
εἰσίδω δ’
274
ἴδω δὲ
275
mvp-comment-155-2
μὲν
276
mvp-comment-156-1
ἐσθήματα
277
mvp-comment-156-2
ἐκείνῳ
278
mvp-comment-156-3
παρεστίους … λοιβάς
279
ἔνθ’ ἐκεῖνον ὤλεσεν
280
mvp-comment-156-4
Acc. to
Homer. Hymn. 29. 4 ff., feasts began and ended with libations to Hestia:
οὐ γὰρ ἄτερ σοῦ
|
εἰλαπίναι θνητοῖσιν, ἵν’ οὐ πρώτῃ πυμάτῃ τε
|
Ἱστίῃ ἀρχόμενος σπένδει μελιηδέα οἶνον
. Soph. fr. 658
<*> πρῷρα λοιβῆς Ἑστία
. Other divinities, including Zeus
σωτήρ
, were similarly honoured; then the paean was sung, and the
πότος
began ( Plat.
Symp.p. 176 A).
mvp-comment-157-1
τούτων
281
mvp-comment-158-1
αὐτοέντην
282
mvp-comment-158-2
Brunck first adopted
αὐτοέντην
283
αὐτοφόντην
284
mvp-comment-158-3
ἡμὶν
285
mvp-comment-159-1
ταλαίνῃ
286
mvp-comment-160-1
ταύτην … τῷδε
287
mvp-comment-161-1
μιάστορι
288
Ἐρινὺν
289
mvp-comment-162-1
ἐγγελῶσα τοῖς ποιουμένοις
290
mvp-comment-163-1
εὑροῦς’
291
τότε
292
mvp-comment-163-2
The conjecture
φρουροῦς’
293
τηροῦς’
294
mvp-comment-164-1
χοροὺς ἵστησι
295
mvp-comment-164-2
μηλοσφαγεῖ … ἱερὰ
296
mvp-comment-164-3
ἔμμην’ ἱερά
297
mvp-comment-164-4
τοῖς σωτηρίοις
298
mvp-comment-164-5
Argive tradition placed Agamemnon's death on the 13th of Gamelion (about the end of January). So said ‘the Argive historians’ (
οἱ Ἀργολικοὶ συγγραφεῖς
),— according to an Argive writer named Deinias, who lived about 225 B.C. (Schol. here: Müller,
Frag. Hist. vol. III. p. 25.) Possibly, then, the idea of Clytaemnestra's hideous festival may have been suggested to the poet by some actual commemoration of the event in Argolis. There was a cult of Agamemnon in various places,—notably in Laconia. (Cp. Roscher's
Lexicon, p. 96.)
mvp-comment-165-1
ἡ δύσμορος
299
κατὰ στέγας
300
mvp-comment-166-1
τέτηκα
301
mvp-comment-166-2
πατρὸς
302
mvp-comment-166-3
The
δαίς
is the feast which, in Homeric fashion (
Il. 1. 467
), would follow the sacrifice (281). Acc. to Eustathius p. 1507. 61 (on
Hom.
Od. 4. 524
ff.),
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαὶς
(or
τράπεζα
) was a proverb
ἐπὶ τῶν ἐπ’ ὀλέθρῳ εὐωχουμένων
. The poet may mean that Clytaemnestra called the festival
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαίς
, in direct allusion to
δεῖπνα ἄρρητα
(203): and this would give a special point to
ἐγγελῶσα
(277). Cp.
Eur.
Or. 1008
τά τ’ ἐπώνυμα δεῖπνα Θυέστου
. But the words do not necessarily imply more than that she called it
Ἀγαμεμνόνεια
.
mvp-comment-167-1
αὐτὴ πρὸς αὑτήν
303
αὑτήν
304
mvp-comment-167-2
κλαῦσαι
305
mvp-comment-167-3
ἡδονὴν φέρει
306
mvp-comment-168-1
ἡ λόγοισι γενναία
307
mvp-comment-169-1
φωνοῦσα
308
mvp-comment-170-1
δύσθεον
309
mvp-comment-170-2
μίσημα
310
mvp-comment-170-3
σοὶ μόνῃ
311
mvp-comment-170-4
τέθνηκεν
312
mvp-comment-170-5
ἐν πένθει
313
mvp-comment-171-1
ἐκ γόων
314
mvp-comment-171-2
οἱ κάτω θεοί
315
mvp-comment-172-1
τάδ’
316
mvp-comment-172-2
ἥξοντ’ Ὀρέστην
317
mvp-comment-173-1
παραστᾶς’
318
mvp-comment-174-1
ἥτις
319
mvp-comment-174-2
ὑπεξέθου
320
mvp-comment-175-1
ἀλλ’ ἴσθι τοι τείσουσά γ’
321
mvp-comment-176-1
ὑλακτεῖ
322
mvp-comment-176-2
σὺν
323
mvp-comment-176-3
πέλας
324
παρών
325
mvp-comment-176-4
301 The adv.
πάντα
326
mvp-comment-176-5
ἄναλκις
327
mvp-comment-176-6
ἡ πᾶσα βλάβη
328
mvp-comment-177-1
σὺν γυναιξὶ
329
mvp-comment-177-2
τὰς μάχας
330
mvp-comment-178-1
ἐφήξειν
331
mvp-comment-179-1
μέλλων … δρᾶν τι
332
mvp-comment-179-2
τὰς οὔσας τε … καὶ τὰς ἀπούσας
333
mvp-comment-179-3
μου
334
μοι
335
mvp-comment-179-4
διέφθορεν
336
mvp-comment-180-1
σωφρονεῖν
337
εὐσεβεῖν
338
mvp-comment-180-2
ἔν τοι κακοῖς
339
mvp-comment-180-3
πολλή )στ’ ἀνάγκη
340
κἀπιτηδεύειν κακά
341
mvp-comment-180-4
I place only a comma, not a colon, after
πάρεστιν
342
mvp-comment-181-1
ὄντος … βεβῶτος
343
mvp-comment-182-1
ἦ κάρτα
344
mvp-comment-182-2
θυραῖον
345
mvp-comment-182-3
οἰχνεῖν
346
mvp-comment-182-4
ἀγροῖσι
347
mvp-comment-182-5
τυγχάνει
348
mvp-comment-183-1
ἦ κἂν … ἱκοίμην
349
ἦ τ<*>ν
350
ἦ δἂν
351
mvp-comment-183-2
ἐς λόγους τοὺς σοὺς ἱκοίμην
352
mvp-comment-184-1
ὡς νῦν
353
ὥς νυν
354
mvp-comment-184-2
ἱστόρει· τί σοι φίλον
355
τό
356
τά
357
mvp-comment-184-3
With the other punctuation,
ἱστόρει τί σοι φίλον
358
mvp-comment-185-1
καὶ δὴ
359
mvp-comment-185-2
τοῦ κασιγνήτου τί φής
360
mvp-comment-185-3
ἥξοντος
361
ἢ μέλλοντος
362
mvp-comment-186-1
φησίν γε
363
mvp-comment-186-2
ποεῖ
364
mvp-comment-187-1
καὶ μὴν ἔγωγ’
365
γε
366
mvp-comment-187-2
οὐκ ὄκνῳ
367
mvp-comment-188-1
ἀρκεῖν
368
mvp-comment-189-1
ἐπεί
369
mvp-comment-189-2
μακρὰν
370
mvp-comment-189-3
324 Here, as in 316,
νῦν
371
νυν
372
mvp-comment-189-4
δόμων
373
φέρουσαν
374
mvp-comment-190-1
ὅμαιμον
375
mvp-comment-190-2
φύσιν
376
mvp-comment-191-1
Χρυσόθεμιν
377
mvp-comment-192-1
οἷα
378
νομίζεται
379
mvp-comment-193-1
πρὸς θυρῶνος ἐξόδοις
380
φωνεῖς
381
ἐλθοῦσα
382
αὖ
383
mvp-comment-193-2
330 For the absence of caesura, cp.
Ph. 101
n.
mvp-comment-194-1
θυμῷ … χαρίζεσθαι
384
mvp-comment-195-1
καίτοι τοσοῦτόν γ’ οἶδα
385
mvp-comment-195-2
κἀμαυτήν, ὅτι
386
mvp-comment-195-3
333 f. For the repeated
ἄν
387
mvp-comment-195-4
οἶ) αὐτοῖς φρονῶ
388
mvp-comment-196-1
ὑφειμένῃ
389
πλεῖν
390
mvp-comment-196-2
For the image, cp.
Eur.
Med. 524
ἄκροισι λαίφους κρασπέδοις
(with close-reefed sails)
ὑπεκφυγεῖν
|
τὴν σὴν στόμαργον, ὦ γύναι, γλωσσαλγίαν
:
Ar.
Ran. 997
ἀλλ’ ὅπως, ὦ γεννάδα
, |
μὴ πρὸς ὀργὴν ἀντιλέξεις
, |
ἀλλὰ συστείλας, ἄκροισι
|
χρώμενος τοῖς ἱστίοις κ.τ.λ.
: and conversely
Soph.
Ant. 715
ναὸς ὅστις ἐγκρατῆ πόδα
|
τείνας ὑπείκει μηδέν
.
Ovid
Epist. 1. 8. 71
moderatius opta, | Et voti, quaeso, contrahe vela tui.
Shakesp.
Henry VI., pt. iii, act 3 sc. 3. 5
‘Now Margaret | Must strike her sail, and learn awhile to serve | Where kings command.’
mvp-comment-197-1
καὶ μὴ δοκεῖν
391
mvp-comment-198-1
τοιαῦτα δ’ ἄλλα
392
ἀλλὰ
393
ἄλλα
394
mvp-comment-199-1
καίτοι τὸ μὲν δίκαιον
395
mvp-comment-199-2
κρίνεις
396
mvp-comment-199-3
εἰ … με δεῖ
397
mvp-comment-199-4
ἐλευθέραν
398
mvp-comment-199-5
ζῆν
399
mvp-comment-199-6
πάντ’
400
mvp-comment-199-7
ἀκουστέα
401
mvp-comment-200-1
δεινόν γε
402
mvp-comment-201-1
τῆς … τικτούσης
403
mvp-comment-201-2
μέλειν
404
mvp-comment-202-1
τἀμὰ νουθετήματα
405
mvp-comment-202-2
κείνης διδακτά
406
mvp-comment-202-3
ἐκ σαυτῆς
407
mvp-comment-203-1
The text, which has been suspected (cr. n.), is sound; but the train of thought is somewhat obscured by compression.
mvp-comment-203-2
‘You forget your father, and care only for your mother. All your counsels to me come from her. Then (
ἔπειτα
),—that being so,—give up the attempt at a compromise. Make a
choice (
ἑλοῦ γε
). You can be imprudent (
φρονεῖν κακῶς
),—as you say that I am,—and loyal to your dead father. Or you can be prudent (
φρονοῦσα
), and forgetful of him,—as you actually are; you who (
ἥτις
) say, indeed, that you would show your hatred of the murderers if you could; and yet, when I
do resist them, you try to turn me from my purpose. You merely add the shame of cowardice to our woes.’
mvp-comment-203-3
ἔπειθ’
408
mvp-comment-203-4
ἑλοῦ γε
409
mvp-comment-203-5
φρονεῖν κακῶς
410
mvp-comment-203-6
Other explanations are:—(1) ‘Choose to be thought either
lost to right feeling, or, if you have such feeling, then at least
forgetful of your duty.’ (2) ‘Choose to seem either
unintelligent (if you are merely the blind instrument of our rulers); or, if you act with clear understanding (
φρονοῦσα
),—thinking to benefit me,—at least forgetful of your father.’ Both these views assume that the question is merely between two interpretations which might be placed on the present conduct of Chrysothemis. But Electra is putting the dilemma between imprudent loyalty and prudent disloyalty.
mvp-comment-204-1
τῶν φίλων
411
mvp-comment-205-1
ἥτις
412
φρονοῦσα
413
μῖσος
414
mvp-comment-206-1
πάντα
415
mvp-comment-206-2
τιμωρουμένης
416
mvp-comment-207-1
οὔτε … τε
417
mvp-comment-207-2
τήν τε δρῶσαν
418
mvp-comment-208-1
πρὸς κακοῖσι
419
mvp-comment-208-2
δειλίαν ἔχει
420
mvp-comment-209-1
ἐπεὶ
421
mvp-comment-209-2
ἢ μάθ’ ἐξ ἐμοῦ
422
mvp-comment-210-1
ἐπαρκούντως
423
mvp-comment-211-1
προσάπτειν
424
mvp-comment-211-2
εἴ τις ἔστ’ ἐκεῖ χάρις
425
mvp-comment-212-1
ἡμὶν
426
ξύνει
427
mvp-comment-213-1
τὰ σὰ … δῶῤ
428
mvp-comment-213-2
ἐφ’ οἶσι
429
mvp-comment-213-3
χλιδᾷς
430
mvp-comment-214-1
ὑπεικάθοιμι
431
mvp-comment-214-2
πλουσία
432
mvp-comment-214-3
περιρρείτω
433
mvp-comment-215-1
τοὐμὲ μὴ λυπεῖν
434
mvp-comment-215-2
Remark the resemblance to the passage where Antigone—summing up her position—compares the
moral pain of neglecting her duty with those penalties which she contemns:—
κείνοις ἂν ἤλγουν· τοῖσδε δ’ οὐκ ἀλγύνομαι
(
Ant. 468
). There, too, we have a Sophoclean triad of clauses, the third echoing the first,—as
τῆς σῆς δ’ οὐκ ἐρῶ τιμῆς τυχεῖν
here reiterates the sense of
σοὶ δὲ πλουσία... βίος
(n. on
Ant. 465
ff.).
mvp-comment-215-3
One of the scholia recognises the traditional reading, and explains it correctly: —
τοῦτο μόνον ἐμὲ βοσκέτω, τὸ μὴ λυπεῖν ἐμὲ αὐτήν, εἰ
(‘as I should do, if’)
τοῖς φονεῦσι τοῦ πατρὸς πείθεσθαι ἀναγκασθήσομαι
.—The conjectures have been numerous: see Appendix.
mvp-comment-216-1
οὐδ’ ἂν σὺ
435
mvp-comment-217-1
παῖδα
436
mvp-comment-217-2
κεκλῆσθαι
437
mvp-comment-218-1
πλείστοις
438
mvp-comment-219-1
μηδὲν
439
πρὸς ὀργὴν
440
mvp-comment-220-1
ἀμφοῖν
441
τοῖς λόγοις
442
mvp-comment-221-1
τῆσδε … αὕτη
443
πάλιν
444
mvp-comment-222-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
445
mvp-comment-222-2
πως
446
mvp-comment-222-3
μύθων
447
mvp-comment-223-1
οὐδ’
448
κοὐδ’
449
ποτέ
450
mvp-comment-224-1
ἰὸν
451
mvp-comment-224-2
σχήσει
452
mvp-comment-225-1
τὸ δεινὸν
453
mvp-comment-225-2
εἰ γὰρ τῶνδέ μοι
454
εἰ
455
mvp-comment-226-1
γὰρ
456
mvp-comment-226-2
γόων
457
λόγων
458
mvp-comment-227-1
ἐνταῦθα
459
mvp-comment-227-2
ἔνθα μή ποτε … προσόψει
460
mvp-comment-227-3
ζῶσα
461
mvp-comment-227-4
κατηρεφεῖ
462
mvp-comment-227-5
χθονὸς τῆσδ’ ἐκτὸς
463
mvp-comment-227-6
ὑμνήσεις
464
mvp-comment-228-1
πρὸς ταῦτα
465
mvp-comment-228-2
Nauck reads
κοὔ
466
καί
467
mvp-comment-228-3
ἐν καλῷ, εὔκαιρον
schol.:
H. 4. 3. 5
νομίσαντες οὐκ ἐν καλῷ εἶναι πρὸς τοὺς ὁπλίτας ἱππομαχεῖν
: so, too,
Eur.
Heracl. 971
, etc. Cp.
καλόν
(
ἐστι
)=
καίριον
in
Soph.
Ph. 1155
; and
εἰς καλόν
=
καιρίως
in
O.T. 78.
mvp-comment-229-1
ἦ ταῦτα δὴ
468
ἦ … δὴ
469
ἦ … γὰρ
470
mvp-comment-229-2
καὶ βεβούλευνται
471
mvp-comment-230-1
ἀλλ’ ἐξίκοιτο
472
mvp-comment-230-2
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκ’
473
mvp-comment-231-1
τίνα … τόνδ’
474
mvp-comment-231-2
τάλαινα
475
mvp-comment-232-1
εἴ τι τῶνδε
476
mvp-comment-233-1
ποῦ ποτ’ εἶ φρενῶν
477
mvp-comment-234-1
ὅπως
478
ὑμῶν
479
mvp-comment-234-2
προσώτατ’
480
προσωτάτω φύγω
481
mvp-comment-235-1
βίου … τοῦ παρόντος
482
mvp-comment-236-1
καλὸς γὰρ
483
mvp-comment-236-2
θαυμάσαι
484
mvp-comment-237-1
τοῖς φίλοις
485
mvp-comment-238-1
εἰκαθεῖν
486
mvp-comment-239-1
ταῦτα
487
οὐκ ἐμοὺς
488
mvp-comment-240-1
γε
489
μέντοι
490
mvp-comment-240-2
μὴ )ξ
491
mvp-comment-240-3
πεσεῖν
492
mvp-comment-240-4
399 A woman, speaking of herself in the plur., uses the masc.:
Ant. 926
παθόντες ἂν ξυγγνοῖμεν ἡμαρτηκότες
.
mvp-comment-241-1
συγγνώμην
493
mvp-comment-242-1
τἄπη
494
mvp-comment-242-2
πρὸς κακῶν
495
mvp-comment-243-1
μή πω
496
mvp-comment-244-1
οἷπερ … ὁδοῦ
497
mvp-comment-245-1
τῷ φέρεις
498
mvp-comment-245-2
ἔμπυρα
499
mvp-comment-246-1
τυμβεῦσαι χοάς
500
mvp-comment-247-1
βροτῶν
501
mvp-comment-248-1
ὃν ἔκταν’ αὐτή
502
ὅν γ’
503
mvp-comment-249-1
τῷ τοῦτ’ ἤρεσεν
504
mvp-comment-250-1
δείματος
505
mvp-comment-250-2
δοκεῖν ἐμοί
506
mvp-comment-251-1
θεοὶ πατρῷοι
507
mvp-comment-251-2
συγγένεσθέ γ’
508
mvp-comment-251-3
ἀλλὰ νῦν
509
mvp-comment-252-1
εἴποιμ’ ἂν τότε
510
mvp-comment-253-1
ἐπὶ σμικρὸν
511
ἐπὶ σμικρῶν
512
mvp-comment-253-2
φράσαι
513
mvp-comment-254-1
σμικροὶ λόγοι
514
mvp-comment-255-1
πατρὸς … δευτέραν ὁμιλίαν
515
mvp-comment-255-2
ἐφέστιον πῆξαι
516
mvp-comment-255-3
This sceptre is described in the
Iliad (2. 101 f.) as the work of Hephaestus, who gave it Zeus; Hermes transmitted it to Pelops, from whom it passed to Atreus and Agamemnon. The Homeric sceptre is often called
χρύσεον
(
Il. 2. 268
, etc.), prob. as being ornamented with gold foil, or studded with gold nails (
Il. 1. 246
χρυσείοις ἥλοισι πεπαρμένον
). Among the objects found at Mycenae are some supposed remains of such sceptres (Schliem.,
Myc. 201, etc.).
mvp-comment-255-4
οὑφόρει ποτέ
517
mvp-comment-256-1
ἔκ τε
518
ἐκ δὲ
519
mvp-comment-256-2
βρύοντα
520
mvp-comment-256-3
ᾧ … γενέσθαι
521
mvp-comment-256-4
The vision resembles that of Astyages, who dreamed that a vine sprang from his daughter Mandanè, the wife of Cambyses,
τὴν δὲ ἄμπελον ἐπισχεῖν τὴν Ἀσίην πᾶσαν
. The
ὀνειροπόλοι
explained this to mean that her son (Cyrus) should reign in his grandfather's stead. (
Her. 1. 108.
) The spreading branches figure also in the dream of Xerxes (7. 19):
ἐδόκεε...ἐστεφανῶσθαι ἐλαίης θαλλῷ, ἀπὸ δὲ τῆς ἐλαίης τοὺς κλάδους γῆν πᾶσαν ἐπισχεῖν
.
mvp-comment-256-5
In choosing the
sceptre of Agamemnon as the stock from which the wondrous growth is put forth, Sophocles may have had in mind the words of Achilles (
Il. 1. 234
ff.);
ναὶ μὰ τόδε σκῆπτρον· τὸ μὲν οὔποτε φύλλα καὶ ὄζους
|
φύσει, ἐπεὶ δὴ πρῶτα τομὴν ἐν ὄρεσσι λέλοιπεν
, |
οὐδ’ ἀναθηλήσει
.
mvp-comment-257-1
του παρόντος
522
τοῦ
523
παρόντος
524
του
525
mvp-comment-257-2
Ἡλίῳ δείκνυσι τοὖναρ
526
mvp-comment-258-1
οὐ κάτοιδα, πλὴν
527
mvp-comment-258-2
πέμπει με κείνη
528
mvp-comment-259-1
These three verses, which the MSS. give to Electra, and which several recent critics reject (cr. n.), clearly belong to Chrysothemis, and are genuine. Electra's exclamation of joy (411) caused Chrysothemis to ask if her sister had any ground for hope (412). Electra replied that, when she had heard the dream, she would say. This showed her sister that Electra relied merely on the fact that Clytaemnestra had seen
some fearful vision. Now, therefore, instead of asking for Electra's interpretation, she merely repeats her counsel (383 f.) before proceeding on her errand. The words
πρός
νυν θεῶν κ.τ.λ.
(428 ff.) show the train of her thought. To Chrysothemis, the alarm of Clytaemnestra (427) is more important than the apparition of Agamemnon. The dream is only a new reason why Electra should be cautious,—not why she should hope.
mvp-comment-259-2
The current ascription of the verses to Electra was doubtless prompted by verse 413. It was supposed that the recital of Chrysothemis must be immediately followed by the comments of Electra. But, as Hermann observed, the phrase
ἀβουλίᾳ πεσεῖν
would alone suffice to show that the verses belong to Chrysothemis (
cp. 398
). Nor could the warning,
σὺν κακῷ μέτει πάλιν
, be fitly uttered by Electra.
mvp-comment-259-3
τῶν ἐγγενῶν
529
mvp-comment-260-1
ἀβουλίᾳ
530
mvp-comment-260-2
σὺν κακῷ
531
mvp-comment-260-3
μέτει
532
mvp-comment-261-1
ἀλλ’
533
mvp-comment-261-2
ὦ φίλη
534
τούτων μὲν
535
mvp-comment-262-1
οὐ … θέμις
536
οὐδ’ ὅσιον
537
mvp-comment-262-2
ἐχθρᾶς ἀπὸ γυναικὸς
538
mvp-comment-262-3
κτερίσματ’
539
mvp-comment-262-4
λουτρὰ
540
mvp-comment-263-1
ἀλλ’ ἢ πνοαῖσιν
541
ῥοαῖσιν
542
mvp-comment-263-2
κρύψον
543
mvp-comment-263-3
νιν
544
mvp-comment-263-4
ἔνθα μή ποτ’
545
ἔνθεν
546
mvp-comment-263-5
εὐνὴν
547
mvp-comment-264-1
ἀλλ’ ὅταν θάῃν
548
mvp-comment-264-2
The conjecture
ἔστ’ ἂν
549
ὅταν
550
σῳζέσθω
551
mvp-comment-264-3
κειμήλἰ
552
mvp-comment-265-1
ἀρχὴν
553
τλημονεστάτη
554
mvp-comment-266-1
ἔβλαστε
555
mvp-comment-267-1
ὅν γ’ … τῷδ’
556
mvp-comment-267-2
ἐπέστεφε
557
mvp-comment-267-3
442 f. The position of
αὐτῇ
558
mvp-comment-267-4
δέξεσθαι
559
mvp-comment-267-5
It seems, then, a reasonable inference that here, where the reference is to future time, he would have written
δέξεσθαι
560
δέξασθαι
561
mvp-comment-267-6
444 ff. Join
θανὼν ἄτιμος
562
mvp-comment-267-7
ἐμασχαλίσθη
563
mvp-comment-267-8
Two different motives are assigned by the Greek commentators; viz.:—(1) the desire to render the dead incapable of wreaking vengeance (
ὥσπερ τὴν δύναμιν ἐκείνων ἀφαιρούμενοι
): (2) the desire to make an atonement (
ἐξιλάσασθαι τὴν δολοφονίαν—ἀφοσιοῦσθαι τὸν φόνον
). There can be little doubt that the first of these motives was the primitive origin of the custom. If the second was afterwards blended with it, the idea may have been that of offering the severed portions to the gods below,—as a victim was devoted to death by cutting off a lock of hair (
Eur.
Alc. 75
). Apollonius Rhodius seems to present the practice in this light (4. 477): Jason, having slain a foe,
ἐξάργματα τάμνε θανόντος
. Cp.
Etym. Magn.:
ἀπάργματα λέγεται τὰ ὑπὸ τῶν τραγῳδῶν λεγόμενα μασχαλίσματα
.
mvp-comment-267-9
κἀπὶ λουτροῖσιν
564
mvp-comment-267-10
ἐξέμαξ ν
565
mvp-comment-267-11
ἆρα μὴ
566
mvp-comment-268-1
οὐκ ἔστιν
567
mvp-comment-268-2
ταῦτα μὲν μέθες· σὺ δὲ
568
mvp-comment-269-1
βοστρύχων ἄκρας φόβας
569
mvp-comment-269-2
κἀμοῦ ταλαίνης
570
mvp-comment-270-1
†ἀλιπαρῆ
571
λιπαρῆ
572
mvp-comment-270-2
We come, therefore, to a dilemma. (1) The words
τήνδ’ ἀλιπαρῆ τρίχα
may conceal some corruption:
τήνδ’
ought possibly to be
τήνδε τ’
573
ἀλίπαρον
574
mvp-comment-270-3
(2) Or else, if the text be sound,
ἀλιπαρῆ
may mean
οὐ λιπαράν
. There is no doubt that
λιπ
, ‘fat,’ is the root both of
λι^παρός
, ‘shining,’ and of
λι—παρής
, ‘sticking’; cp.
Plat.
Crat. 427 B
τὸ λιπαρὸν καὶ τὸ κολλῶδες
(
Curt.
Etym. § 340
). Similarly
γλίσχρος
, ‘sticky,’ came to mean ‘importunate.’ It is barely possible that, in coining a new negative compound, the poet may have transferred the sense of
λιπαρός
to
λιπαρής
: but it seems improbable.
mvp-comment-271-1
ζῶμα
575
mvp-comment-271-2
χλιδαῖς
576
mvp-comment-272-1
προσπίτνουσα
577
αὐτὸν
578
mvp-comment-273-1
ἐξ ὑπερτέρας χερός
579
mvp-comment-273-2
ζῶντ’
580
mvp-comment-274-1
ἀφνεωτέραις
581
mvp-comment-274-2
στέφωμεν
582
mvp-comment-274-3
δωρούμεθα
583
mvp-comment-275-1
οἶμαι μὲν οὖν
584
mvp-comment-275-2
If
μέλον
585
μέλειν
586
μέλον
587
mvp-comment-276-1
σοί
588
mvp-comment-277-1
βροτῶν
589
mvp-comment-278-1
πρὸς εὐσέβειαν
590
mvp-comment-279-1
δράσω
591
mvp-comment-279-2
τὸ γὰρ δίκαιον
592
mvp-comment-279-3
(1)
τὸ δίκαιον
is an acc. of general reference, and
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
is impersonal. ‘With regard to what is (clearly) right, it is unreasonable for two persons to dispute; rather both should hasten on the doing (of it).’ With
ἀλλ’ ἐπισπεύδειν
we supply the notion
δεῖ
from the negative
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
(as from
οὐκ ἔξεστι
in
O. C. 1402
ff.; cp.
O. T. 817
ff.). For the form of the sentence, cp.
H. 7. 3. 7
τοὺς περὶ Ἀρχίαν...οὐ ψῆφον ἀνεμείνατε, ἀλλὰ ὁπότε πρῶτον ἐδυνάσθητε ἐτιμωρήσασθε
. So here the acc.
τὸ δίκαιον
, which represents the object of
δρᾶν
, is separated from it by the parenthesis
οὐκ
ἔχει λόγον δυοῖν ἐρίζειν
. (The first scholium gives substantially this view:
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον φιλονεικεῖν περὶ τοῦ δικαίου, ὥστε περὶ αὐτοῦ δύο ὄντας ἐρίζειν
.)
mvp-comment-279-4
(2) Or
τὸ δίκαιον
might be nom.: ‘that which is clearly right does not
afford any ground (
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
) for two persons to dispute,’ etc. So the second schol.:
ἢ τὸ οὐκ ἔχει λόγον ἀντὶ τοῦ οὐ παρέχει πρόφασιν
. So far as the verb
ἔχει
is concerned, this sense is quite admissible: cp.
Thuc. 2. 41
οὔτε τῷ πολεμίῳ ἐπελθόντι ἀγανάκτησιν ἔχει
(
ἡ πόλις
). The objection is that the phrases
ἔχειν λόγον, οὐκ ἔχειν λόγον
, which are very common, regularly mean, ‘to be reasonable,’ ‘to be unreasonable.’ This is so both in the personal and in the impersonal constr.; as Plat.
Phaedop. 62 D
τὸ γὰρ μὴ ἀγανακτεῖν...οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
:
Dem. or. 36 § 54
πῶς ἔχει λόγον σὲ...δίκην ἀξιοῦν λαμβάνειν
; The supposed sense, ‘not to
afford a reason,’ is unexampled.
mvp-comment-279-5
δυοῖν
593
mvp-comment-280-1
παρ’ ὑμῶν
594
mvp-comment-281-1
πικρὰν
595
δοκῶ με … τολμήσειν
596
ἔτι
597
mvp-comment-282-1
εἰ μὴ )γὼ
598
mvp-comment-282-2
γνώμας λειπομένα
599
mvp-comment-283-1
ἁ πρόμαντις Δίκα
600
mvp-comment-283-2
δίκαια φερομένα χεροῖν κράτη
601
mvp-comment-284-1
μέτεισιν
602
mvp-comment-284-2
οὐ μακροῦ χρόνου
603
mvp-comment-285-1
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
604
κλύουσαν
605
mvp-comment-285-2
ἁδυπνόων … ὀνειράτων
606
mvp-comment-286-1
ἀμναστεῖ γ’ ὁ φύσας ς’
607
mvp-comment-287-1
χαλκόπλακτος
608
mvp-comment-287-2
γένυς
609
mvp-comment-287-3
The very axe (
φόνιος πέλεκυς
, 99) with which the blow was dealt is imagined as nourishing a grudge against the murderers who had set it such a task. Such a personification recalls that practice of Athenian law by which inanimate objects which had caused death were brought to a formal trial in the court called
τὸ ἐπὶ Πρυτανείῳ
, and, after sentence, cast beyond the boundaries, in the presence of the Archon Basileus and the sacrificial officers of the tribes (
φυλο‐
βασιλεῖς
). Aeschin. or. 3 § 244
τὰ μὲν ξύλα καὶ τοὺς λίθους καὶ τὸν σίδηρον, τὰ ἄφωνα καὶ ἀγνώμονα, ἐάν τῳ ἐμπεσόντα ἀποκτείνῃ, ὑπερορίζομεν
. (Cp.
Dem. or. 23 § 76
.) A like conception was implied in the English law (repealed in 1846) of ‘deodands’ (Deo danda),
i.e., personal chattels (whether animals or things) which, having caused the death of a human being, were forfeited to the Crown for pious uses.
mvp-comment-288-1
ἐν αἰκίαις
610
mvp-comment-289-1
καὶ πολύπους καὶ πολύχειρ
611
mvp-comment-290-1
λόχοις
612
mvp-comment-290-2
χαλκόπους
613
mvp-comment-291-1
ἄλεκτρ’ ἄνυμφα
614
mvp-comment-291-2
γάμων ἁμιλλήμαθ’
615
mvp-comment-291-3
ἐπέβα
616
mvp-comment-292-1
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι … συνδρῶσιν
617
mvp-comment-292-2
Verses 495—497 (
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι...τέρας
) answer metrically to vv. 479—481
ὕπεστί μοι...ὀνειράτων
, where the text is certain, save for the doubt whether
θράσος
or
θάρσος
should stand in 479. Here we must first decide two points.
mvp-comment-292-3
(1) Are the words
πρὸ τῶνδε
618
mvp-comment-292-4
(2) Could
ἔχει με, μήποτε τέρας πελᾶν
(etc.) mean, ‘
the belief possesses me, that’ etc.? Surely not. No real parallel for so strange a phrase has been produced. It is irrelevant to quote those impersonal verbs which directly express the
occurrence of a thought to the mind; as
Xen.
An. 6. 1. 17
εἰσῄει αὐτοὺς ὅπως ἂν καὶ ἔχοντές τι οἴκαδε ἀφίκοιντο
(‘the thought came to them, how they might,’ etc.):
Thuc. 6. 78.
§ 1
εἰ δέ τῳ ἄρα παρέστηκε, τὸν μὲν Συρακόσιον...πολέμιον εἶναι κ.τ.λ.
Either, then, the subject to
ἔχει
has dropped out, or the words
μ’ ἔχει
conceal a corruption.
mvp-comment-292-5
The following remedies are possible: I incline to the first, as involving least change. (1) Reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
, we may read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοί μ’ ἔχει
|
<θάρσος τι>, μήποθ’ ἡμῖν
etc. (It may be remarked that
τι
is in harmony with the tone of
ὕπεστί μοι
in 479.) Another available word is
ξύννοια
(cp.
Ant. 279
). (2) Or, reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θάρσος
, we could read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι θάρσος ἴσχει με
. On either view, the
υ
of
ἁδυπνόων
in 480 is long (as several critics have assumed). It should be noted that (1) involves a different constitution of the verses: see p. lxxxii.
mvp-comment-292-6
In those MSS. which have
μή ποτε μή ποθ’ ἡμῖν
619
mvp-comment-293-1
ἀψεγές
620
ἀψεφές
621
mvp-comment-293-2
πελᾶν
622
mvp-comment-294-1
τοῖς δρῶσι
623
τοῖς συνδρῶσιν
624
mvp-comment-295-1
μαντεῖαι βροτῶν
625
mvp-comment-296-1
εὖ κατασχήσει
626
mvp-comment-297-1
ἱππεία
627
mvp-comment-297-2
Oenomaüs, king of Pisa in Elis, had promised the hand of his daughter Hippodameia to the suitor who should defeat him in a chariot-race; the penalty of failure being death. The young Pelops, son of Tantalus, offered himself as a competitor. Myrtilus, the charioteer of Oenomaüs, was persuaded (either by Hippodameia or by Pelops) to betray his master. He did so by leaving out one or both of the linch-pins by which the naves of the chariot-wheels were secured to the axles.
Tzetzes on Lycophron 156
ταῖς χοινίκισι
(=
πλήμναις
, the naves)
τῶν τροχῶν οὐκ ἐμβαλὼν τοὺς ἥλους
. According to another story, he substituted a linch-pin of wax for a real one (
schol. Apoll. Rh. 752
ἐμβαλόντα κήρινον ἔμβολον ἐπὶ τοῦ ἀκραξονίου
). So Pelops won the race, and the bride. But Oenomaüs was soon avenged on the traitor; for Myrtilus insulted Hippodameia, and was thrown into the sea by Pelops; upon whose house he invoked a curse, as he sank.
mvp-comment-297-3
Euripides, too, (
Or. 990
ff.,
Helen. 386 f.) refers to this chariot-race as the event with which the troubles of the Pelopidae began. Apollonius Rhodius briefly describes the critical moment of the race as one of the subjects embroidered on the cloak of Jason (1. 752 ff.); there Oenomaüs was seen, ‘falling sideways, as the axle broke at the naves of the wheels,’—
ἄξονος ἐν πλήμνῃσι παρακλιδὸν ἀγνυμένοιο
|
πίπτεν
.
mvp-comment-297-4
The eastern pediment of the temple of Zeus at Olympia (
circ. 450 B.C.) was adorned with sculptures by Paeonius, representing the preparation for this contest (
Paus. 5. 10. 6
). The fragments found on the site have sufficed for a reconstruction of the group. Zeus occupied the centre; to the right of him were Pelops and Hippodameia; to the left, Oenomaüs and his wife Steropè. On each side was a chariot drawn by four horses. Myrtilus was sitting in front of his team, with his face turned away from his master.
mvp-comment-297-5
In the older and nobler form of the myth, Pelops won, not by a fraud, but by the grace of Poseidon, who gave him winged horses (Pindar
O. 1. 87
ἔδωκεν δίφρον τε χούσεον πτεροῖσίν τ’ ἀκάμαντας ἵππους
). On the chest (
λάρναξ
) of Cypselus, seen by Pausanias in the Heraeum at Olympia (
Paus. 5. 17. 5
), Pelops was driving two winged horses.
mvp-comment-298-1
αἰανὴς
628
mvp-comment-298-2
The form
αἰανὴς
has the best authority, and some critics hold that
αἰανὸς
(Hesych.) was a Byzantine invention. But in
Aesch.
Eum. 416
,
ἡμεῖς γάρ ἐσμεν νυκτὸς αἰανῆς τέκνα
(so L, schol., and Tzetzes on Lycophron 406),
αἰανῆ
is far less suitable.
mvp-comment-299-1
εὖτε
629
mvp-comment-299-2
ὁ ποντισθεὶς Μυρτίλος
630
mvp-comment-299-3
A vase found at Capua shows Pelops and Hippodameia in a ship, from which Myrtilus is falling backwards into the water. A winged Erinys hovers in the air above, brandishing a sword over the head of Pelops (Baumeister,
Denkmäler p. 1204, referring to
Mon. Inst. x. 25).
mvp-comment-299-4
ἐκοιμάθη
631
mvp-comment-300-1
παγχρυσέων δίφρων
632
mvp-comment-301-1
πρόρριζος
633
mvp-comment-301-2
ἐκριφθείς
634
mvp-comment-302-1
ἔλειπεν
635
ἔλιπεν
636
οἴκου
637
οἴκους
638
πω
639
mvp-comment-303-1
πολύπονος
640
αἰκία
641
mvp-comment-304-1
ἀνειμένη
642
μέν
643
mvp-comment-304-2
ὡς ἔοικας
644
mvp-comment-304-3
στρέφει
645
mvp-comment-304-4
Clytaemnestra begins in the same strain as Chrysothemis, who likewise emphasised her reproof by the word
αὖ
646
mvp-comment-305-1
μή τοι θυραίαν γ’
647
mvp-comment-305-2
αἰσχύνειν φίλους
648
mvp-comment-306-1
καίτοι
649
mvp-comment-306-2
δὴ
650
πολλούς
651
mvp-comment-306-3
ἐξεῖπάς με … ὡς
652
mvp-comment-306-4
θρασεῖα
653
τραχεῖα
654
mvp-comment-306-5
ἄρχω
655
mvp-comment-307-1
ὕβριν … οὐκ ἔχω
656
κακῶς κλύουσα
657
mvp-comment-308-1
πατὴρ γάρ
658
mvp-comment-308-2
πρόσχημα
659
mvp-comment-309-1
ἡ γὰρ Δίκη
660
mvp-comment-310-1
ᾗ χρῆν σ’ ἀρήγειν
661
mvp-comment-311-1
The order of words in the MSS.,
ἐπεὶ πατὴρ οὗτος σός
, is probably right; the words would then fall from her with a certain deliberate bitterness.
Cp. 542
:
Ant. 44
ἦ γὰρ νοεῖς θάπτειν σθ’
(n.):
Ph. 101
λέγω σ’ ἐγὼ δόλῳ Φιλοκτήτην λαβεῖν
.
mvp-comment-312-1
μοῦνος
662
Ἑλλήνων
663
mvp-comment-312-2
Nauck requires
τὴν αὐτὸς αὑτοῦ
instead of
τὴν σὴν ὅμαιμον
, because Agamemnon's unique crime was the slaughter of his own child: as if the text did not convey this. Clytaemnestra means, ‘while mourning a father, you forget a sister.’
mvp-comment-312-3
532 f. The regular mode of expression would be,
οὐκ ἴσον λύπης καμὼν ἐμοί, ὁ σπείρας τῇ τικτούσῃ
. But, having written
ὅτ’ ἔσπειρε
, the poet explains
ἐμοί
by repeating the comparison in a new form,
ὥσπερ ἡ τίκτουσ’ ἐγώ
. (For
ὡς
or
ὥσπερ
after
ἴσος
, cp.
Lys. or. 19 § 36
ἡγοῦντο... τὰ ἐκεῖ...εἶναι ἴσα ὥσπερ τὰ ἐνθάδε
.) Those who reject v. 533 omit to notice that, without it, the words
οὐκ ἴσον καμὼν ἐμοί
would be unintelligible. Cp.
Aesch.
Ag. 1417
ἔθυσεν αὑτοῦ παῖδα, φιλτάτην ἐμοὶ
|
ὠδῖν’
.
mvp-comment-312-4
This assertion of the mother's superior claim is a counterpart to the doctrine of Athena in
Aesch.
Eum. 658
f.,
οὐκ ἔστι μήτηρ ἡ κεκλημένου τέκνου
|
τοκεύς, τροφὸς δὲ κύματος νεοσπόρου
. Cp. above,
Aesch. Eum. 366
n.
mvp-comment-313-1
τοῦ χάριν, τίνων
664
mvp-comment-313-2
The alternative, which most editors have preferred, is to take
τίνων
as the participle. But there is an insuperable objection to this, which seems to have escaped notice. The words,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could mean only, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
for what?’ They could not mean, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
to whom?’ The latter would be
τῷ χάριν τίνων
; See (
e.g.)
Aesch.
P. V. 985
καὶ μὴν ὀφείλων ἂν τίνοιμ’ αὐτῷ χάριν
:
Aesch.
Ag. 821
τούτων θεοῖσι χρὴ πολύμνηστον χάριν
|
τίνειν
. Hence the question,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could not possibly be answered by
Ἀργείων
. For, evidently, the latter word could not mean, (‘for a benefit conferred by) the Greeks.’ A scholiast in the Baroccian MS. (cr. n. on 545), who explains
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
by
τίνος χάριν ἀποδιδούς
, plainly meant, ‘showing gratitude for what?’—and his paraphrase was correct; only he overlooked the context.
mvp-comment-314-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ μετῆν
665
mvp-comment-315-1
ἀλλ’ ἀντ’ ἀδελφοῦ δῆτα
666
κτανὼν
667
mvp-comment-315-2
ἀντὶ ἀδελφοῦ
668
mvp-comment-315-3
τἄμ’
669
mvp-comment-316-1
παῖδες … διπλοῖ
670
mvp-comment-316-2
540 f. Nauck would prefer a single verse in place of these two, viz.
οὓς Ἰφιγενείας εἰκὸς ἦν θνῄσκειν πάρος
.
mvp-comment-317-1
ἢ
671
mvp-comment-317-2
ἢ τῶν ἐμῶν Ἅιδης
672
mvp-comment-318-1
δαίσασθαι
673
mvp-comment-318-2
The conj.
λῄσασθαι
674
mvp-comment-319-1
πανώλει
675
mvp-comment-319-2
παρεῖτο
676
mvp-comment-319-3
The sense does not absolutely require us to take
Μενέλεω δ’
677
mvp-comment-320-1
ἀβούλου
678
mvp-comment-320-2
κακοῦ γνώμην
679
mvp-comment-321-1
δοκῶ μέν
680
mvp-comment-321-2
εἰ καὶ
681
mvp-comment-322-1
εἰ φωνὴν λάβοι
682
mvp-comment-323-1
τοῖς πεπραγμένοις
683
mvp-comment-324-1
γνώμην δικαίαν σχοῦσα
684
mvp-comment-325-1
ἐρεῖς μὲν οὐχὶ
685
ἐρεῖς
686
ἐρεῖς … μ’ ὡς
687
mvp-comment-325-2
ἄρξασά τι λυπηρὸν
688
mvp-comment-325-3
τάδ’ ἐξήκους’
689
mvp-comment-326-1
τοῦ τεθνηκότος θ’ ὕπερ
690
mvp-comment-327-1
καὶ μὴν
691
mvp-comment-327-2
λόγους ἐξῆρχές με
692
mvp-comment-328-1
Clytaemnestra has argued that she was justified in slaying Agamemnon, because he had slain Iphigeneia. The topics of Electra's reply are as follows.
mvp-comment-328-2
(1) 558—562. The wife who slew her husband would be a criminal, even if the motive had been just retribution; but the real motive was her love for Aegisthus. (2) 563—576. Agamemnon was not a free agent in slaying Iphigeneia; the act was forced upon him by Artemis. (3) 577—583. Suppose, however, that he was a free agent, and wished to please his brother; still she was not justified in taking his life. (4) 584—594. And in any case her plea does not excuse her for living with the man who helped to slay her husband.—The speech then closes in a strain of reproach and defiance (595 —609).
mvp-comment-328-3
καὶ δὴ λέγω σοι
693
πατέρα
694
φὴς
695
mvp-comment-329-1
εἴτ’ οὖν … εἴτε
696
mvp-comment-329-2
λέξω
697
δείξω
698
mvp-comment-330-1
ὡς οὐ δίκῃ γ’
699
ἔσπασεν
700
πειθὼ
701
mvp-comment-331-1
κυναγὸν
702
mvp-comment-331-2
ποινὰς
703
mvp-comment-331-3
τὰ πολλὰ πνεύματ’ ἔσχ’
704
τὰ πολλὰ
705
ἔσχε
706
mvp-comment-331-4
Acc. to Aesch. (
Aesch.
Ag. 149
f.,
Aesch. Ag. 192
), the Greeks were detained by
adverse winds, blowing from the N.E. : and this seems to have been the account given in the
Cypria (
c. 776 B.C.), Proclus
Chrest. p. 455:
ἐπέσχεν αὐτοὺς τοῦ πλοῦ χειμῶνας ἐπιπέμπουσα
. But other authorities speak of a
calm. Thus
I. A. 9 ff.
οὔκουν φθόγγος γ’ οὔτ’ ὀρνίθων
|
οὔτε θαλάσσης· σιγαὶ δ’ ἀνέμων
|
τόνδε κατ’ Εὔριπον ἔχουσιν
. Schol.
Eur.
Or. 647
ἐπειράθη τῆς θεοῦ ὀργιζομένης καὶ κατεχούσης τοὺς ἀνέμους
. Tzetzes on Lycophron 183
χολωθεῖσα δ’ ἐπὶ τούτῳ ἡ θεὸς τοὺς ἀνέμους κατέσχεν
. Ovid (
Met. 13. 183
) combines both versions:
exspectata diu, nulla aut contraria classi | Flamina sunt.
mvp-comment-331-5
It has been objected that vessels provided with oars need not have been detained by a calm. But the ships of the Greek fleet were not light craft. Each carried from 50 to 120 armed men, besides
σκεύη πολεμικά
: and the warriors were also the rowers (cp.
Thuc. 1. 10
). It is intelligible, then, that they should await the aid of wind before attempting the passage of the Aegaean. We must remember, too, the strong and shifting currents in the Euripus (
στονόεντα πορθμόν
,
Soph.
Ant. 1145
:
παλιρρόχθοις ἐν Αὐλίδος τόποις
,
Aesch.
Ag. 191
).
mvp-comment-331-6
We cannot well render:—(1)‘He
suffered those tedious winds,’—supplying
ὁ πατήρ
from v. 558. Nor: (2) ‘She
directed those tedious winds at Aulis,’—a version which would at least require
ἐπ’ Αὐλίδι
. Cp.
Ph. 1119
ἔχε
|
δύσποτμον ἀρὰν ἐπ’ ἄλλοις
.
mvp-comment-331-7
The conjecture
πλοῖα
707
mvp-comment-331-8
Αὐλίδι
708
mvp-comment-332-1
ἢ )γὼ φράσω
709
κείνης
710
mvp-comment-333-1
ὡς ἐγὼ κλύω
711
mvp-comment-333-2
θεᾶς … κατ’ ἄλσος
712
mvp-comment-333-3
παίζων
713
mvp-comment-333-4
ποδοῖν
714
mvp-comment-334-1
ἔλαφον
715
mvp-comment-334-2
στικτὸν
716
mvp-comment-334-3
κεράστην
717
mvp-comment-334-4
οὗ κατὰ σφαγὰς
718
mvp-comment-335-1
ἐκκομπάσας ἔπος τι τυγχάνει
719
βαλών
720
mvp-comment-335-2
This is the reason against taking
τυγχάνει
with
βαλών
, as=‘he shoots and hits’; cp.
Il. 15. 581
θηρητὴρ ἐτύχησε βαλών
:
Her. 3. 35
εἰ...τοῦ παιδὸς...βαλὼν τύχοιμι
. The vaunt must then
precede the hit.
mvp-comment-335-3
Others take
βαλὼν
721
ἔπος
722
mvp-comment-335-4
Monk, with Musgrave, took
σφαγὰς
723
mvp-comment-336-1
ἐκ τοῦδε
724
mvp-comment-336-2
μηνίσασα
725
mvp-comment-336-3
Λητῴα κόρη
726
mvp-comment-337-1
ὡς
727
ἀντίσταθμον
728
mvp-comment-337-2
ἐκθύσειε
729
mvp-comment-338-1
ὧδ’ ἦν
730
mvp-comment-338-2
τὰ … θύματ’
731
mvp-comment-338-3
λύσις
732
mvp-comment-338-4
πρὸς οἶκον
733
mvp-comment-339-1
πολλὰ
734
mvp-comment-339-2
ἀντιβὰς
735
mvp-comment-339-3
μόλις
736
mvp-comment-340-1
εἰ δ’ οὖν
737
mvp-comment-340-2
ἐρῶ γὰρ καὶ τὸ σόν
738
mvp-comment-341-1
τούτου … οὕνεκ’
739
mvp-comment-341-2
νόμῳ
740
mvp-comment-342-1
ὅρα
741
μὴ … τιθῇς
742
τίθης
743
mvp-comment-342-2
Here, either
τίθης
or
τιθῇς
would be suitable. (1) With
τίθης
:—‘See that, in making this rule, you
are not making woe for yourself.’ This means that to make the rule (as she is doing) is at once (logically) to make the woe. (2) With
τιθῇς
: —‘See
lest, in making this rule, you
make woe for yourself’:
i.e., the rule may have the woe as a consequence. The woe is a future contingency (583
εἰ δίκης γε τυγχάνοις
), against which Electra warns her. On the whole, I now prefer
τιθῇς
.
Cp. 1003
ὅρα κακῶς πράσσοντε μὴ μείζω κακὰ
|
κτησώμεθ’
: fr. 82
ἀλλ’ ὅρα μὴ κρεῖσσον ᾖ
.
mvp-comment-342-3
τιθεῖσα … νόμον
744
mvp-comment-343-1
εἰ γὰρ κτενοῦμεν
745
mvp-comment-343-2
πρώτη
746
mvp-comment-344-1
εἰσόρα
747
mvp-comment-344-2
οὐκ οὖσαν
748
mvp-comment-344-3
τίθης
749
mvp-comment-344-4
εἰ … θέλεις
750
mvp-comment-345-1
τῷ παλαμναίῳ
751
mvp-comment-345-2
πρόσθεν ἐξαπώλεσας
752
mvp-comment-346-1
παιδοποιεῖς
753
mvp-comment-346-2
Erigonè, daughter of Aegisthus and Clytaemnestra (Tzetzes on
Lyc. 1374
), was mentioned by the early cyclic poet Cinaethon (
Paus. 2. 18. 6
), and was the theme of Sophocles in his
Ἠριγόνη
. Hyginus (
Hyg.
Fab. 122
) notices a son of Aegisthus named Aletes, who gives his name to a play by Sophocles, but does not record the mother: see p. xliii note 4.
mvp-comment-346-3
εὐσεβεῖς
754
mvp-comment-346-4
κἀξ εὐσεβῶν
755
mvp-comment-346-5
By
τοὺς...πρόσθεν εὐσεβεῖς
Electra means Orestes and herself. Both are ‘cast out’ of their just rights. Cp.
O.T. 611
φίλον ...ἐσθλὸν ἐκβαλεῖν
.
Eur.
El. 62
τεκοῦσα δ’ ἄλλους παῖδας Αἰγίσθῳ πάρα
|
πάρεργ’ Ὀρέστην κἀμὲ ποιεῖται δόμων.
mvp-comment-346-6
βλαστόντας
756
mvp-comment-346-7
ἐκβαλοῦσ’ ἔχεις
757
mvp-comment-347-1
πῶς ταῦτ’ ἐπαινέσαιμ’ ἄν
758
mvp-comment-347-2
ἢ
759
ἦ
760
καὶ τοῦτ’
761
ἄποινα
762
mvp-comment-348-1
αἰσχρῶς δ’
763
δ’
764
mvp-comment-348-2
ἐάν περ καὶ λέγῃς
765
mvp-comment-348-3
ἐχθροῖς γαμεῖσθαι
766
mvp-comment-348-4
These two verses, though not indispensable, seem genuine. Were they omitted, the transition from 592 to 595 would be somewhat abrupt.
mvp-comment-349-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ γὰρ
767
mvp-comment-349-2
πᾶσαν ἵης γλῶσσαν
768
mvp-comment-350-1
κακοστομοῦμεν
769
mvp-comment-350-2
καί σ’ ἔγωγε δεσπότιν
770
mvp-comment-350-3
εἰς ἡμᾶς
771
ἣ
772
mvp-comment-351-1
βίον μοχθηρόν
773
mvp-comment-351-2
ἔκ τε σοῦ
774
κακοῖς … ξυνοῦσα
775
mvp-comment-351-3
συννόμου
776
mvp-comment-352-1
ὁ δ’ ἄλλος
777
mvp-comment-352-2
χεῖρα σὴν
778
mvp-comment-352-3
τρίβει βίον
779
mvp-comment-352-4
603 The reason for writing
δή με σοὶ
780
δή μέ σοι
781
mvp-comment-352-5
μιάστορα
782
mvp-comment-353-1
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκα
783
mvp-comment-354-1
εἰς ἅπαντας
784
mvp-comment-354-2
χρῇς
785
mvp-comment-354-3
στόμαργον
786
mvp-comment-355-1
τῶνδε τῶν ἔ|ργων ἴδρις
787
mvp-comment-355-2
σχεδόν τι
788
mvp-comment-355-3
οὐ καταισχύνω
789
mvp-comment-356-1
ὁρῶ μένος πνέουσαν
790
μένος πνέουσαν
791
mvp-comment-356-2
σὺν δίκῃ ξύνεστι
792
mvp-comment-356-3
Other interpretations are:—(1) ‘I see that Electra is wroth; but as to whether she is in the right, I see no concern (anywhere),’—a timid way of saying that
Clytaemnestra shows no such concern. So the schol. (2) ‘I see that Clytaemnestra is angry, but not that she cares whether she is right’:—an inference from some gesture. Both these versions rely on the fact that
φροντίδος
(612) is plainly an echo of
φροντίδ’
(611). But: (
a) it does not follow that
φροντίδ’
is not
Electra's thought. (
b) It is surely clear that
πνέουσαν
must be Electra; and (
c) as in
Ant. 471
f., the second clause naturally refers to the same person.
mvp-comment-357-1
ποίας δ’ ἐμοὶ δεῖ
793
ἐμοὶ
794
μοι
795
δεῖ
796
mvp-comment-357-2
Others understand: (1) ‘If Electra has no consideration for justice, why should I have any consideration for her,—
i.e., show her any tenderness?’ Or: (2) ‘If she heeds not justice, why should I heed her?’ Neither view seems well suited to the context.
mvp-comment-358-1
καὶ ταῦτα
797
mvp-comment-358-2
τηλικοῦτος
798
mvp-comment-358-3
ἆρα
799
mvp-comment-358-4
χωρεῖν ἂν
800
εἰς πᾶν ἔργον
801
mvp-comment-359-1
εὖ νυν ἐπίστω
802
mvp-comment-359-2
ἔξωρα
803
mvp-comment-359-3
προσεικότα
804
mvp-comment-360-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
805
mvp-comment-360-2
ἡ … ἐκ σοῦ δυσμένεια
806
mvp-comment-360-3
ἐξαναγκάζει
807
αἰσχροῖς
808
mvp-comment-360-4
622 f. The word
θρέμμα
809
mvp-comment-360-5
ἦ σ’ ἐγὼ
810
mvp-comment-361-1
νιν
811
mvp-comment-361-2
εὑρίσκεται
812
mvp-comment-361-3
Cp. Milton,
Apology for Smectymnuus (in his
Prose Works, ed. Symmons, vol. I. p. 236): ‘I might also tell them [the prelates], what Electra in Sophocles, a wise virgin, answered her wicked mother, who thought herself too violently reproved by her the daughter: ‘'
Tis you that say it,
not I; you do the deeds, |
And your ungodly deeds find me the words.’’
mvp-comment-362-1
οὐ μὰ
813
mvp-comment-362-2
δέσποιναν
814
mvp-comment-362-3
Ἄρτεμιν
815
mvp-comment-362-4
θράσους τοῦδ’ οὐκ ἀλύξεις
816
μόλῃ
817
mvp-comment-363-1
ὁρᾷς
818
mvp-comment-363-2
ἐκφέρει
819
mvp-comment-363-3
The
v. l.
παρεῖσα
820
mvp-comment-364-1
οὐδὲ
821
mvp-comment-364-2
ὑπ’ εὐφήμου βοῆς
822
mvp-comment-364-3
ἐπειδὴ σοί γ’
823
mvp-comment-364-4
πᾶν λέγειν
824
mvp-comment-365-1
κελεύω
825
mvp-comment-365-2
τοὐμὸν στόμ’
826
mvp-comment-365-3
634 f. An altar, and probably an image, of Apollo stand before the palace. The attendant of Clytaemnestra carries offerings of various fruits, which she is now commanded to
raise, as with a gesture of solemn oblation (
ἔπαιρε
827
mvp-comment-365-4
ἡ παροῦσά μοι
828
mvp-comment-365-5
θύματα … πάγκαρπα
829
mvp-comment-366-1
λυτηρίους … δειμάτων
830
mvp-comment-366-2
ἀνάσχω
831
mvp-comment-367-1
κλύοις ἂν
832
mvp-comment-367-2
προστατήριε
833
mvp-comment-368-1
κεκρυμμένην
834
mvp-comment-368-2
οὐ γὰρ ἐν φίλοις
835