mvp-comment-47-1
πατρὸς
1
mvp-comment-47-2
λουτρά
2
mvp-comment-47-3
φέρει … ἐφ’ ἡμῖν
3
mvp-comment-47-4
νίκην
4
κράτος τῶν δρωμένων
5
mvp-comment-47-5
All three actors now leave the scene. Orestes and Pylades go to Agamemnon's grave,—departing, probably, by the entrance on the spectators' right. The Paedagogus leaves by the entrance on the left,—to await the moment for seeking admission to the house (v. 660).—It might, indeed, be inferred from
πειρώμεθ’
(83) that the old man goes with the youths to their task; but the word need not imply more than his participation in the plan. while verses 73—75 seem clearly to indicate that he separates from his companions. When they have gone, Electra enters from the house.
mvp-comment-48-1
A
θρῆνος ἀπὸ σκηνῆς
, or lyric lament delivered by an actor alone. as dist. from the joint
κομμός
of actor and Chorus (121 n.).
mvp-comment-48-2
Verses 86—102 form a
σύστημα
,=vv. 103—120 (
ἀντισύστημα
). If the text is sound, the correspondence is not exact, since the dimeter in v. 99 answers to a monometer in v. 116. These anapaests are, however, of the type usually known as ‘free’ or ‘melic,’ as having more of a lyric character than the regular anapaests of the marching-songs (like those of the Parodos in the
Ajax): see W. Christ,
Metrik, 2nd ed., § 288. And in such anapaests the symmetry of ‘systems’ is often not strict (cp.
O. C. 117
n.).
mvp-comment-48-3
ὦ φάος ἁγνὸν
6
mvp-comment-48-4
γῆς ἰσόμοιρ’ ἀήρ
7
mvp-comment-48-5
ἰσόμοιῤ
8
ἰσόμοιρος
9
mvp-comment-49-1
πολλὰς μὲν … ᾔσθου
10
mvp-comment-49-2
ἀντήρεις
11
mvp-comment-50-1
πληγὰς
12
πλαγὰς
13
mvp-comment-51-1
ὑπολειφθῇ
14
ᾔσθου
15
mvp-comment-52-1
τὰ … παννυχίδων
16
ξυνίσας’
17
ὅσα … θρηνῶ
18
mvp-comment-52-2
ἤδη
19
mvp-comment-52-3
The MS.
οἴκων
20
λέκτρων
21
μογερῶν
22
mvp-comment-53-1
ὅσα τὸν δύστηνον
23
mvp-comment-54-1
κατὰ μὲν βάρβαρον αἶαν
24
ἐξένισεν
25
mvp-comment-55-1
Ἄρης
26
mvp-comment-55-2
ἐξένισεν
27
mvp-comment-56-1
κοινολεχὴς
28
mvp-comment-57-1
ὅπως δρῦν ὑλοτόμοι
29
mvp-comment-57-2
σχίζουσι
30
mvp-comment-57-3
κάρα
31
mvp-comment-57-4
πέλεκει
32
mvp-comment-58-1
ἄλλης
33
mvp-comment-58-2
φέρεται
34
mvp-comment-58-3
The deletion of the words
ἀπ’ ἄλλης
35
ἢ )μοῦ
36
mvp-comment-59-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ μὲν δὴ
37
mvp-comment-60-1
ἄστρων
38
mvp-comment-60-2
Others read,
ἔστ’ ἂν λεύσσω παμφεγγεῖς
|
ῥιπάς, λεύσσω δὲ τόδ’ ἦμαρ
, omitting
ἄστρων
. But
παμφεγγεῖς ῥιπάς
, without
ἄστρων
, would not suffice to denote starlight. If, again, the phrase is taken to denote the
sun's rays (as Monk proposes,
Mus. Crit. I. p. 67), then
λεύσσω δὲ τόδ’ ἦμαρ
becomes weak. Further, the preceding context, in which she has spoken of her laments
at night (92) and at morning, clearly suggests that the sense here is, ‘so long as I look on the
stars or on the
sun.’
mvp-comment-61-1
μὴ οὐ
39
mvp-comment-61-2
τεκνολέτειῤ
40
mvp-comment-62-1
ἐπὶ κωκυτῷ
41
mvp-comment-62-2
ἠχὼ
42
mvp-comment-63-1
Electra invokes, (1) the house of Hades and his bride Persephone, in which the spirit of Agamemnon now dwells; (2) Hermes, who, as
ψυχοπομπός
, conducted him thither,—and who will also guide the avengers on their way (1395 f.); (3)
Ἀρά
, the imprecation uttered by the victim upon his murderers,—the personified curse, here conceived as a supernatural power (
πότνια
), which calls the Erinyes into action; and (4) the Erinyes themselves.
mvp-comment-63-2
Ἀΐδου
43
mvp-comment-64-1
ὦ χθόνἰ Ἑρμῆ
44
mvp-comment-64-2
Ἀρά
45
mvp-comment-64-3
πότνια
46
mvp-comment-65-1
σεμναὶ
47
mvp-comment-65-2
θεῶν παῖδες
48
mvp-comment-66-1
ὁρᾶθ’
49
mvp-comment-67-1
αἳ τοὺς εὐνὰς ὑποκλεπτομένους
50
mvp-comment-67-2
These much-impugned words appear genuine. The murder has been prompted by the guilty love:
δόλος ἦν ὁ φράσας, ἔρος ὁ κτείνας
(197). In Electra's thought, they are inseparable. The allusion to the love
follows the reference to the murder, because she regards it as the crowning outrage (271
τὴν τελευταίαν ὕβριν
) that Clytaemnestra still lives with Aegisthus. Bloodshed was not the only sin which the Erinyes punished. They were the embodied sanctions of natural law, and every crime against the family came within their cognisance. (See
Introd. to Homer, p. 51, § 13.) Indeed, Electra herself speaks of the unhallowed union as a special provocation to those Avengers: 275 f.
ἡ δ’ ὧδε τλήμων ὥστε τῷ μιάστορι
|
ξύνεστ’, Ἐρινὺν οὔτιν’ ἐκφοβουμένη
.
mvp-comment-68-1
τείσασθε
51
mvp-comment-69-1
ἡμετέρου
52
μοι
53
mvp-comment-69-2
καί μοι
54
mvp-comment-70-1
ἄγειν
55
mvp-comment-70-2
σωκῶ
56
mvp-comment-71-1
δυστανοτάτας
57
mvp-comment-72-1
τάκεις … οἰμωγὰν
58
mvp-comment-72-2
ἀκόρεστον
59
mvp-comment-72-3
τὸν πάλαι
60
mvp-comment-72-4
πάλαι
61
ἐκ
62
mvp-comment-72-5
ἀθεώτατα
63
mvp-comment-72-6
κακᾷ … χειρὶ πρόδοτον
64
χειρὶ
65
mvp-comment-72-7
ὡς
66
mvp-comment-72-8
ὁ τάδε πορὼν
67
mvp-comment-72-9
εἴ μοι θέμις
68
mvp-comment-73-1
γενέθλα
69
mvp-comment-73-2
γενναίων
70
mvp-comment-73-3
παραμύθ‐
71
ιον
72
mvp-comment-74-1
ξυνίημι
73
mvp-comment-74-2
τάδ’
74
mvp-comment-75-1
φυγγάνει
75
mvp-comment-75-2
οὐδ’ ἐθέλω
76
mvp-comment-76-1
μὴ οὐ
77
mvp-comment-76-2
τὸν ἐμὸν … πατέρ’ ἄθλιον
78
mvp-comment-77-1
παντοίας
79
mvp-comment-77-2
Electra's lyrics contain some Doricisms (129, 146 f., etc.): but it is best to retain
φιλότητος
, with the MSS. The form in
η
was so familiar through Homer that it may have been preferred to
φιλότατος
even in lyrics.
Cp. 236
.
mvp-comment-78-1
ἀλύειν
80
mvp-comment-79-1
αἰαῖ, ἱκνοῦμαι
81
mvp-comment-80-1
τόν γ’ ἐξ Ἀΐδα … λίμνας
82
mvp-comment-80-2
παγκοίνου
83
mvp-comment-80-3
ἀνστάσεις
84
mvp-comment-81-1
οὔτε †γόοις οὔτε λιταῖσιν
85
οὔτε γόοισιν οὔτ’ εὐχαῖς
86
mvp-comment-82-1
For the repetition of
ἀλλά
87
mvp-comment-82-2
ἀπὸ τῶν μετρίων
88
mvp-comment-82-3
ἀμήχανον
89
mvp-comment-82-4
ο=ιόλλυσαι
90
mvp-comment-83-1
ἐν οἷς
91
mvp-comment-83-2
ἀνάλυσις … κακῶν
92
mvp-comment-83-3
τί μοι
93
mvp-comment-84-1
νήπιος
94
mvp-comment-84-2
γονέων
95
mvp-comment-85-1
ἐμέ γ’ … ἄραρεν
96
mvp-comment-85-2
φρένας
97
mvp-comment-86-1
αἰὲν Ἴτυν
98
mvp-comment-87-1
ὄρνις
99
mvp-comment-87-2
ἀτυζομένα
100
mvp-comment-87-3
Διὸς ἄγγελος
101
mvp-comment-88-1
Νιόβα, σὲ δ’
102
θεόν
103
mvp-comment-88-2
ἅτ’
104
mvp-comment-88-3
ἐν τάφῳ πετραίῳ
105
mvp-comment-89-1
αἰεὶ
106
mvp-comment-90-1
οὔτοι σοὶ μούνᾳ
107
mvp-comment-91-1
πρὸς ὅ τι
108
mvp-comment-91-2
τῶν ἔνδον εἶ περισσά
109
mvp-comment-92-1
οἷς
110
τῶν ἔνδον
111
mvp-comment-92-2
ὁμόθεν
112
γονᾷ ξύναιμος
113
mvp-comment-93-1
οἵα Χρ. ζώει
114
mvp-comment-93-2
Acc. to the version followed by Sophocles, Agamemnon had four daughters, Iphigeneia, Electra, Chrysothemis, Iphianassa. This was the account given in the cyclic
Κύπρια ἔπη
, as the schol. here mentions; a poem of which there is another trace in this play (566 ff.). Sophocles wrote an
Ἰφιγένεια
(
Nauck,
frag. Soph. 284—292
); but her name is not mentioned in the reference to her death below (530—594). In
Il. 9. 145
Agamemnon has three daughters, Chrysothemis, Laodicè, Iphianassa: Homer does not mention Iphigeneia. Lucretius gives the name of Iphianassa to the victim at Aulis (
1. 85
).
mvp-comment-93-3
ζώει
115
mvp-comment-93-4
καὶ Ἰφιάνασσα
116
mvp-comment-94-1
ἀχέων
117
mvp-comment-94-2
Hermann, taking
ἀχέων
118
κρυπτᾷ
119
mvp-comment-95-1
ὄλβιος, ὃν
120
mvp-comment-95-2
For the simple
ὅς
, instead of
ὅς γε
or
ὅστις
, with causal force, cp. below, 188, 261, 959;
O.T. 817.
mvp-comment-96-1
δέξεται εὐπατρίδαν
121
mvp-comment-96-2
Διὸς εὔφρονι
122
βήματι
123
mvp-comment-96-3
γᾶν
124
γᾶ
125
mvp-comment-96-4
Ὀρέσταν
126
ὃν
127
mvp-comment-97-1
ἀκάματα
128
mvp-comment-97-2
ἀνύμφευτος
129
ἄτεκνος
130
mvp-comment-97-3
οἰχνῶ
131
mvp-comment-98-1
δάκρυσι μυδαλέα
132
mvp-comment-98-2
τὸν ἀνήνυτον
133
mvp-comment-98-3
οἶτον ἔχουσα
134
mvp-comment-99-1
ὧν τ’ ἔπαθ’
135
ὧν τ’ ἐδάη
136
mvp-comment-99-2
Wecklein, reading
ἐδάην
, explains,— ‘what I have heard from him,’—viz., his promises of coming.
mvp-comment-99-3
τί γὰρ … ἀγγελίας
137
mvp-comment-99-4
ἀπατώμενον
138
τί … οὐκ
139
mvp-comment-99-5
Herwerden's
οὐχί μοι
140
οὐκ ἐμοί
141
ὁ δέ
142
mvp-comment-100-1
ποθεῖ, ποθῶν δ’
143
mvp-comment-101-1
ἔτι μέγας οὐρανῷ
144
ἐν
145
mvp-comment-102-1
τὸν ὑπεραλγῆ
146
mvp-comment-102-2
νέμουσα
147
mvp-comment-103-1
μήτε ὑπεράχθεο
148
οἷς
149
mvp-comment-104-1
εὐμαρὴς θεός
150
θεός
151
mvp-comment-105-1
οὔτε γὰρ
152
mvp-comment-105-2
Κρῖσαν
153
mvp-comment-105-3
Crisa stood about two miles W.S.W. of Delphi, on a spur of Parnassus, at the lower outlet of the gorge through which the river Pleistus issues into the plain. The
Iliad mentions ‘sacred Crisa’ (
ζαθέην
, 2. 520). But the Homeric Hymn to the Pythian Apollo is the best witness to its ancient power. There, just as here, the name
Κρῖσα
includes the land which stretches southward from the town to its harbour on the ‘wide gulf’ (vv. 253— 261). We need not, then, read
Κρίσᾳ
or
Κρίσας
. Crisa was the earliest seat of trade on the western sea; Delphi, when first founded, was merely a sanctuary in its territory. Pindar recalls the old prominence of its name when he describes a Pythian victory as won
Κρισαίαις ἐνὶ πτυχαῖς
(
P. 6. 18).
mvp-comment-105-4
Cirrha, a town of much later date, was the port of Crisa on the gulf. About 585 B.C., the Delphians, aided by Cleisthenes of Sicyon and his allies, succeeded, after a long struggle, in humbling Crisa and destroying Cirrha. The Crisaean plain was then devoted to Apollo, whose domain was thus extended from his temple to the coast. When Sophocles wrote, that ground was still a
βούνομος ἀκτή
, inviolable by plough or spade. It was not till the middle of the next century that the alleged encroachments of Amphissa on the
ἱερὰ χώρα
gave a pretext for war to the Amphictyons (355 B.C.).
mvp-comment-105-5
Ulrichs (
Reisen in Griechenland) was the first to place the relations of Crisa and Cirrha in a clear light. Strabo correctly describes the site of Cirrha, but erroneously places Crisa to the east of it (9. p. 418).
mvp-comment-106-1
βούνομον
154
βουνόμον
155
mvp-comment-106-2
βούνομον ἀκτὰν
156
Κρῖσαν
157
mvp-comment-107-1
ἀπερίτροπος
158
mvp-comment-108-1
παρὰ τὸν Ἀχέροντα
159
ἀνάσσων
160
θεὸς
161
mvp-comment-109-1
μὲν
162
mvp-comment-109-2
ὁ πολὺς … βίοτος
163
mvp-comment-109-3
ἀνέλπιστος
164
mvp-comment-109-4
187 *
τεκέων
. I am now satisfied that this is a true correction of
τοκέων
165
ἅτις
166
τοκέων
167
mvp-comment-110-1
ἁπερεί
168
mvp-comment-110-2
ἔποικος
169
mvp-comment-111-1
οἰκονομῶ θαλάμους
170
mvp-comment-112-1
ἀεικεῖ σὺν στολᾷ
171
mvp-comment-113-1
κεναῖς δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
172
ἀμφίσταμαι
173
mvp-comment-113-2
Hartung, reading
κενὰ δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
, takes the sense to be that she stands ‘hungry’ by the tables at which the others feast. But
κενή
as=
νῆστις
would be neither usual nor elegant.
mvp-comment-114-1
Hitherto the Chorus have offered consolation or counsel. At v. 213 they return to that strain. But here, moved by Electra's misery, they join with her in bewailing its cause.
mvp-comment-114-2
οἰκτρὰ μὲν … πλαγά
174
κοίταις
175
οἰκτρὰ … αὐδὰ
176
mvp-comment-114-3
Sophocles, who follows the Homeric story as to the banquet, could not but remember the
οἰκτροτάτην ὄπα
of the dying Cassandra. And this might naturally suggest to him that other
οἰκτρὰ αὐδή
which she had uttered at an earlier moment, immediately after Agamemnon's return,—her presage of his fate, and her own:
Aesch.
Ag. 1072
—1314.
mvp-comment-114-4
The sense then is:—‘There was a voice of lamentation at the return from Troy’; alluding especially to Cassandra's laments, but also, perhaps, to forebodings in the mouth of the people at Mycenae. ‘And there was a voice of lamentation
ἐν κοίταις πατρῴαις
, when thy father lay on the couch at the fatal banquet.’ The ‘voice’ at the banquet is, first, that of the dying Agamemnon; but Sophocles may have thought also of Cassandra's death-cry, which was sounding in the king's ears as he fell.—For other interpretations, see Appendix.
mvp-comment-114-5
νόστοις
177
ἐν
178
mvp-comment-114-6
κοίταις
179
mvp-comment-114-7
ὅτε οἱ
180
σοι
181
ἀνταία
182
mvp-comment-114-8
γενύων
183
mvp-comment-115-1
δόλος … ἔρος
184
mvp-comment-116-1
δεινὰν δεινῶς
185
δεινὰν … μορφάν
186
mvp-comment-116-2
εἴτ’ οὖν … εἴτε
187
βροτῶν
188
mvp-comment-117-1
πλέον … ἐχθίστα
189
mvp-comment-117-2
δὴ
190
mvp-comment-118-1
νὺξ
191
mvp-comment-118-2
δείπνων
192
mvp-comment-119-1
ἄχθη
193
τοῖς
194
θανάτους
195
mvp-comment-119-2
διδύμαιν χειροῖν
196
διδύμοιν
197
mvp-comment-120-1
εἷλον … πρόδοτον
198
mvp-comment-121-1
οἷς
199
mvp-comment-121-2
Ὀλύμπιος
200
mvp-comment-122-1
ποίνιμα
201
mvp-comment-123-1
ἀγλαΐας
202
mvp-comment-123-2
ἀποναίατο
203
mvp-comment-124-1
πόρσω
204
mvp-comment-125-1
γνώμαν ἴσχεις
205
mvp-comment-125-2
ἐξ οἵων
206
mvp-comment-125-3
τὰ παρόντ’
207
mvp-comment-125-4
οἰκείας
208
mvp-comment-126-1
πολύ … τι κακῶν
209
mvp-comment-126-2
ὑπερεκτήσω
210
mvp-comment-127-1
τὰ δὲ
211
οὐκ ἐριστὰ τοῖς δυνατοῖς
212
πλάθειν
213
mvp-comment-127-2
ἐριστά
214
mvp-comment-127-3
πλάθειν
215
mvp-comment-128-1
δεινοῖς ἠναγκάσθην
216
mvp-comment-129-1
ὀργά
217
ἔξοιδ’
218
mvp-comment-130-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
219
mvp-comment-130-2
ἐν … δεινοῖς
220
mvp-comment-130-3
σχήσω
221
mvp-comment-130-4
ταύτας ἄτας
222
mvp-comment-131-1
ὄφρα
223
mvp-comment-131-2
βίος ἔχῃ με
224
σχήσω
225
mvp-comment-132-1
τίνι γάρ … τίνι φρονοῦντι καίρια
226
ἀκούσαιμ’ ἂν πρόσφορον ἔπος
227
τίνι
228
πρόσφορον
229
mvp-comment-132-2
Other explanations are:—(1) Taking the dative with
πρόσφορον
:—‘To what person who feels aright would that word be suitable which I should hear (=which would be said of me)?’ That is: Should I not deserve to incur a censure from which every right-minded person would shrink? Should I not deserve to be called
δυσσεβής
? This seems forced; and it does not well suit
ἔπος
. (2) Taking the dative with
ἀκούσαιμι
:—‘At whose mouth (=
from whom), that thinks aright, could I hear a suitable word of comfort?’ But such a dative seems impossible. In
Il. 16. 515
δύνασαι δὲ σὺ πάντοσ’ ἀκούειν
|
ἀνέρι κηδομένῳ
, the dat. is one of interest, denoting the person whose prayer is heard (‘
for him’); cp.
Il. 5. 115
κλῦθί μοι
: 24. 335
ἔκλυες ᾧ κ’ ἐθέλῃσθα
.
mvp-comment-133-1
ἄνετε
230
mvp-comment-133-2
ἄλυτα
231
mvp-comment-133-3
κεκλήσεται
232
mvp-comment-133-4
231 f. For
ἐκ
233
mvp-comment-133-5
ἀνάριθμος
234
θρήνων
235
mvp-comment-134-1
ἀλλ’ οὖν
236
γε
237
εὐνοίᾳ
238
mvp-comment-135-1
μάτηρ ὡσεί τις
239
mvp-comment-136-1
μὴ τίκτειν
240
mvp-comment-136-2
ἄταν ἄταις
241
mvp-comment-137-1
καὶ τί μέτρον
242
κακότατος
243
mvp-comment-137-2
φέρε
244
mvp-comment-137-3
ἐπὶ τοῖς φθ.
245
mvp-comment-138-1
ἔβλαστ’
246
mvp-comment-139-1
τούτοις
247
mvp-comment-140-1
εἴ τῳ πρόσκειμαι χρηστῷ
248
mvp-comment-141-1
ξυνναίοιμ’
249
mvp-comment-141-2
εὔκηλος
250
mvp-comment-141-3
γονέων
251
ἐκτίμους
252
mvp-comment-141-4
ἐκτίμους ἵσχουσα
253
mvp-comment-141-5
πτέρυγας … γόων
254
mvp-comment-141-6
ὀξυτόνων
255
mvp-comment-142-1
εἰ γὰρ
256
mvp-comment-142-2
γᾶ
257
mvp-comment-142-3
οὐδὲν
258
ὢν
259
εἰ
260
mvp-comment-142-4
Electra is contrasting her father, whose earthly life has been cut short, with his murderers, who survive. But she believes that his spirit lives in the world below, and will be active in aiding the vengeance (453 ff.).
mvp-comment-142-5
πάλιν
261
mvp-comment-142-6
ἀντιφόνους δίκας
262
mvp-comment-143-1
ἔρροι τ’
263
mvp-comment-143-2
αἰδὼς
264
εὐσέβεια
265
mvp-comment-144-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
266
mvp-comment-144-2
καὶ
267
τὸ σὸν … καὶ τοὐμὸν
268
mvp-comment-145-1
νίκα
269
mvp-comment-145-2
ἅμα
270
mvp-comment-146-1
πολλοῖσι θρήνοις
271
mvp-comment-147-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
272
mvp-comment-148-1
ἥτις εὐγενὴς γυνή
273
mvp-comment-149-1
πατρῷα … πήματα
274
mvp-comment-150-1
κατ’ εὐφρόνην
275
mvp-comment-150-2
θάλλοντα
276
mvp-comment-151-1
ᾗ
277
mvp-comment-151-2
πρῶτα μὲν … εἶτα … ἔπειτα
278
ᾗ
279
mvp-comment-151-3
τὰ μητρὸς
280
mvp-comment-151-4
ἔχθιστα συμβέβηκεν
281
mvp-comment-152-1
κἀκ τῶνδ’ ἄρχομαι
282
mvp-comment-153-1
λαβεῖν … τὸ τητᾶσθαι
283
mvp-comment-154-1
ποίας
284
δοκεῖς
285
mvp-comment-155-1
ἴδω
286
εἰσίδω δ’
287
ἴδω δὲ
288
mvp-comment-155-2
μὲν
289
mvp-comment-156-1
ἐσθήματα
290
mvp-comment-156-2
ἐκείνῳ
291
mvp-comment-156-3
παρεστίους … λοιβάς
292
ἔνθ’ ἐκεῖνον ὤλεσεν
293
mvp-comment-156-4
Acc. to
Homer. Hymn. 29. 4 ff., feasts began and ended with libations to Hestia:
οὐ γὰρ ἄτερ σοῦ
|
εἰλαπίναι θνητοῖσιν, ἵν’ οὐ πρώτῃ πυμάτῃ τε
|
Ἱστίῃ ἀρχόμενος σπένδει μελιηδέα οἶνον
. Soph. fr. 658
<*> πρῷρα λοιβῆς Ἑστία
. Other divinities, including Zeus
σωτήρ
, were similarly honoured; then the paean was sung, and the
πότος
began ( Plat.
Symp.p. 176 A).
mvp-comment-157-1
τούτων
294
mvp-comment-158-1
αὐτοέντην
295
mvp-comment-158-2
Brunck first adopted
αὐτοέντην
296
αὐτοφόντην
297
mvp-comment-158-3
ἡμὶν
298
mvp-comment-159-1
ταλαίνῃ
299
mvp-comment-160-1
ταύτην … τῷδε
300
mvp-comment-161-1
μιάστορι
301
Ἐρινὺν
302
mvp-comment-162-1
ἐγγελῶσα τοῖς ποιουμένοις
303
mvp-comment-163-1
εὑροῦς’
304
τότε
305
mvp-comment-163-2
The conjecture
φρουροῦς’
306
τηροῦς’
307
mvp-comment-164-1
χοροὺς ἵστησι
308
mvp-comment-164-2
μηλοσφαγεῖ … ἱερὰ
309
mvp-comment-164-3
ἔμμην’ ἱερά
310
mvp-comment-164-4
τοῖς σωτηρίοις
311
mvp-comment-164-5
Argive tradition placed Agamemnon's death on the 13th of Gamelion (about the end of January). So said ‘the Argive historians’ (
οἱ Ἀργολικοὶ συγγραφεῖς
),— according to an Argive writer named Deinias, who lived about 225 B.C. (Schol. here: Müller,
Frag. Hist. vol. III. p. 25.) Possibly, then, the idea of Clytaemnestra's hideous festival may have been suggested to the poet by some actual commemoration of the event in Argolis. There was a cult of Agamemnon in various places,—notably in Laconia. (Cp. Roscher's
Lexicon, p. 96.)
mvp-comment-165-1
ἡ δύσμορος
312
κατὰ στέγας
313
mvp-comment-166-1
τέτηκα
314
mvp-comment-166-2
πατρὸς
315
mvp-comment-166-3
The
δαίς
is the feast which, in Homeric fashion (
Il. 1. 467
), would follow the sacrifice (281). Acc. to Eustathius p. 1507. 61 (on
Hom.
Od. 4. 524
ff.),
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαὶς
(or
τράπεζα
) was a proverb
ἐπὶ τῶν ἐπ’ ὀλέθρῳ εὐωχουμένων
. The poet may mean that Clytaemnestra called the festival
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαίς
, in direct allusion to
δεῖπνα ἄρρητα
(203): and this would give a special point to
ἐγγελῶσα
(277). Cp.
Eur.
Or. 1008
τά τ’ ἐπώνυμα δεῖπνα Θυέστου
. But the words do not necessarily imply more than that she called it
Ἀγαμεμνόνεια
.
mvp-comment-167-1
αὐτὴ πρὸς αὑτήν
316
αὑτήν
317
mvp-comment-167-2
κλαῦσαι
318
mvp-comment-167-3
ἡδονὴν φέρει
319
mvp-comment-168-1
ἡ λόγοισι γενναία
320
mvp-comment-169-1
φωνοῦσα
321
mvp-comment-170-1
δύσθεον
322
mvp-comment-170-2
μίσημα
323
mvp-comment-170-3
σοὶ μόνῃ
324
mvp-comment-170-4
τέθνηκεν
325
mvp-comment-170-5
ἐν πένθει
326
mvp-comment-171-1
ἐκ γόων
327
mvp-comment-171-2
οἱ κάτω θεοί
328
mvp-comment-172-1
τάδ’
329
mvp-comment-172-2
ἥξοντ’ Ὀρέστην
330
mvp-comment-173-1
παραστᾶς’
331
mvp-comment-174-1
ἥτις
332
mvp-comment-174-2
ὑπεξέθου
333
mvp-comment-175-1
ἀλλ’ ἴσθι τοι τείσουσά γ’
334
mvp-comment-176-1
ὑλακτεῖ
335
mvp-comment-176-2
σὺν
336
mvp-comment-176-3
πέλας
337
παρών
338
mvp-comment-176-4
301 The adv.
πάντα
339
mvp-comment-176-5
ἄναλκις
340
mvp-comment-176-6
ἡ πᾶσα βλάβη
341
mvp-comment-177-1
σὺν γυναιξὶ
342
mvp-comment-177-2
τὰς μάχας
343
mvp-comment-178-1
ἐφήξειν
344
mvp-comment-179-1
μέλλων … δρᾶν τι
345
mvp-comment-179-2
τὰς οὔσας τε … καὶ τὰς ἀπούσας
346
mvp-comment-179-3
μου
347
μοι
348
mvp-comment-179-4
διέφθορεν
349
mvp-comment-180-1
σωφρονεῖν
350
εὐσεβεῖν
351
mvp-comment-180-2
ἔν τοι κακοῖς
352
mvp-comment-180-3
πολλή )στ’ ἀνάγκη
353
κἀπιτηδεύειν κακά
354
mvp-comment-180-4
I place only a comma, not a colon, after
πάρεστιν
355
mvp-comment-181-1
ὄντος … βεβῶτος
356
mvp-comment-182-1
ἦ κάρτα
357
mvp-comment-182-2
θυραῖον
358
mvp-comment-182-3
οἰχνεῖν
359
mvp-comment-182-4
ἀγροῖσι
360
mvp-comment-182-5
τυγχάνει
361
mvp-comment-183-1
ἦ κἂν … ἱκοίμην
362
ἦ τ<*>ν
363
ἦ δἂν
364
mvp-comment-183-2
ἐς λόγους τοὺς σοὺς ἱκοίμην
365
mvp-comment-184-1
ὡς νῦν
366
ὥς νυν
367
mvp-comment-184-2
ἱστόρει· τί σοι φίλον
368
τό
369
τά
370
mvp-comment-184-3
With the other punctuation,
ἱστόρει τί σοι φίλον
371
mvp-comment-185-1
καὶ δὴ
372
mvp-comment-185-2
τοῦ κασιγνήτου τί φής
373
mvp-comment-185-3
ἥξοντος
374
ἢ μέλλοντος
375
mvp-comment-186-1
φησίν γε
376
mvp-comment-186-2
ποεῖ
377
mvp-comment-187-1
καὶ μὴν ἔγωγ’
378
γε
379
mvp-comment-187-2
οὐκ ὄκνῳ
380
mvp-comment-188-1
ἀρκεῖν
381
mvp-comment-189-1
ἐπεί
382
mvp-comment-189-2
μακρὰν
383
mvp-comment-189-3
324 Here, as in 316,
νῦν
384
νυν
385
mvp-comment-189-4
δόμων
386
φέρουσαν
387
mvp-comment-190-1
ὅμαιμον
388
mvp-comment-190-2
φύσιν
389
mvp-comment-191-1
Χρυσόθεμιν
390
mvp-comment-192-1
οἷα
391
νομίζεται
392
mvp-comment-193-1
πρὸς θυρῶνος ἐξόδοις
393
φωνεῖς
394
ἐλθοῦσα
395
αὖ
396
mvp-comment-193-2
330 For the absence of caesura, cp.
Ph. 101
n.
mvp-comment-194-1
θυμῷ … χαρίζεσθαι
397
mvp-comment-195-1
καίτοι τοσοῦτόν γ’ οἶδα
398
mvp-comment-195-2
κἀμαυτήν, ὅτι
399
mvp-comment-195-3
333 f. For the repeated
ἄν
400
mvp-comment-195-4
οἶ) αὐτοῖς φρονῶ
401
mvp-comment-196-1
ὑφειμένῃ
402
πλεῖν
403
mvp-comment-196-2
For the image, cp.
Eur.
Med. 524
ἄκροισι λαίφους κρασπέδοις
(with close-reefed sails)
ὑπεκφυγεῖν
|
τὴν σὴν στόμαργον, ὦ γύναι, γλωσσαλγίαν
:
Ar.
Ran. 997
ἀλλ’ ὅπως, ὦ γεννάδα
, |
μὴ πρὸς ὀργὴν ἀντιλέξεις
, |
ἀλλὰ συστείλας, ἄκροισι
|
χρώμενος τοῖς ἱστίοις κ.τ.λ.
: and conversely
Soph.
Ant. 715
ναὸς ὅστις ἐγκρατῆ πόδα
|
τείνας ὑπείκει μηδέν
.
Ovid
Epist. 1. 8. 71
moderatius opta, | Et voti, quaeso, contrahe vela tui.
Shakesp.
Henry VI., pt. iii, act 3 sc. 3. 5
‘Now Margaret | Must strike her sail, and learn awhile to serve | Where kings command.’
mvp-comment-197-1
καὶ μὴ δοκεῖν
404
mvp-comment-198-1
τοιαῦτα δ’ ἄλλα
405
ἀλλὰ
406
ἄλλα
407
mvp-comment-199-1
καίτοι τὸ μὲν δίκαιον
408
mvp-comment-199-2
κρίνεις
409
mvp-comment-199-3
εἰ … με δεῖ
410
mvp-comment-199-4
ἐλευθέραν
411
mvp-comment-199-5
ζῆν
412
mvp-comment-199-6
πάντ’
413
mvp-comment-199-7
ἀκουστέα
414
mvp-comment-200-1
δεινόν γε
415
mvp-comment-201-1
τῆς … τικτούσης
416
mvp-comment-201-2
μέλειν
417
mvp-comment-202-1
τἀμὰ νουθετήματα
418
mvp-comment-202-2
κείνης διδακτά
419
mvp-comment-202-3
ἐκ σαυτῆς
420
mvp-comment-203-1
The text, which has been suspected (cr. n.), is sound; but the train of thought is somewhat obscured by compression.
mvp-comment-203-2
‘You forget your father, and care only for your mother. All your counsels to me come from her. Then (
ἔπειτα
),—that being so,—give up the attempt at a compromise. Make a
choice (
ἑλοῦ γε
). You can be imprudent (
φρονεῖν κακῶς
),—as you say that I am,—and loyal to your dead father. Or you can be prudent (
φρονοῦσα
), and forgetful of him,—as you actually are; you who (
ἥτις
) say, indeed, that you would show your hatred of the murderers if you could; and yet, when I
do resist them, you try to turn me from my purpose. You merely add the shame of cowardice to our woes.’
mvp-comment-203-3
ἔπειθ’
421
mvp-comment-203-4
ἑλοῦ γε
422
mvp-comment-203-5
φρονεῖν κακῶς
423
mvp-comment-203-6
Other explanations are:—(1) ‘Choose to be thought either
lost to right feeling, or, if you have such feeling, then at least
forgetful of your duty.’ (2) ‘Choose to seem either
unintelligent (if you are merely the blind instrument of our rulers); or, if you act with clear understanding (
φρονοῦσα
),—thinking to benefit me,—at least forgetful of your father.’ Both these views assume that the question is merely between two interpretations which might be placed on the present conduct of Chrysothemis. But Electra is putting the dilemma between imprudent loyalty and prudent disloyalty.
mvp-comment-204-1
τῶν φίλων
424
mvp-comment-205-1
ἥτις
425
φρονοῦσα
426
μῖσος
427
mvp-comment-206-1
πάντα
428
mvp-comment-206-2
τιμωρουμένης
429
mvp-comment-207-1
οὔτε … τε
430
mvp-comment-207-2
τήν τε δρῶσαν
431
mvp-comment-208-1
πρὸς κακοῖσι
432
mvp-comment-208-2
δειλίαν ἔχει
433
mvp-comment-209-1
ἐπεὶ
434
mvp-comment-209-2
ἢ μάθ’ ἐξ ἐμοῦ
435
mvp-comment-210-1
ἐπαρκούντως
436
mvp-comment-211-1
προσάπτειν
437
mvp-comment-211-2
εἴ τις ἔστ’ ἐκεῖ χάρις
438
mvp-comment-212-1
ἡμὶν
439
ξύνει
440
mvp-comment-213-1
τὰ σὰ … δῶῤ
441
mvp-comment-213-2
ἐφ’ οἶσι
442
mvp-comment-213-3
χλιδᾷς
443
mvp-comment-214-1
ὑπεικάθοιμι
444
mvp-comment-214-2
πλουσία
445
mvp-comment-214-3
περιρρείτω
446
mvp-comment-215-1
τοὐμὲ μὴ λυπεῖν
447
mvp-comment-215-2
Remark the resemblance to the passage where Antigone—summing up her position—compares the
moral pain of neglecting her duty with those penalties which she contemns:—
κείνοις ἂν ἤλγουν· τοῖσδε δ’ οὐκ ἀλγύνομαι
(
Ant. 468
). There, too, we have a Sophoclean triad of clauses, the third echoing the first,—as
τῆς σῆς δ’ οὐκ ἐρῶ τιμῆς τυχεῖν
here reiterates the sense of
σοὶ δὲ πλουσία... βίος
(n. on
Ant. 465
ff.).
mvp-comment-215-3
One of the scholia recognises the traditional reading, and explains it correctly: —
τοῦτο μόνον ἐμὲ βοσκέτω, τὸ μὴ λυπεῖν ἐμὲ αὐτήν, εἰ
(‘as I should do, if’)
τοῖς φονεῦσι τοῦ πατρὸς πείθεσθαι ἀναγκασθήσομαι
.—The conjectures have been numerous: see Appendix.
mvp-comment-216-1
οὐδ’ ἂν σὺ
448
mvp-comment-217-1
παῖδα
449
mvp-comment-217-2
κεκλῆσθαι
450
mvp-comment-218-1
πλείστοις
451
mvp-comment-219-1
μηδὲν
452
πρὸς ὀργὴν
453
mvp-comment-220-1
ἀμφοῖν
454
τοῖς λόγοις
455
mvp-comment-221-1
τῆσδε … αὕτη
456
πάλιν
457
mvp-comment-222-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
458
mvp-comment-222-2
πως
459
mvp-comment-222-3
μύθων
460
mvp-comment-223-1
οὐδ’
461
κοὐδ’
462
ποτέ
463
mvp-comment-224-1
ἰὸν
464
mvp-comment-224-2
σχήσει
465
mvp-comment-225-1
τὸ δεινὸν
466
mvp-comment-225-2
εἰ γὰρ τῶνδέ μοι
467
εἰ
468
mvp-comment-226-1
γὰρ
469
mvp-comment-226-2
γόων
470
λόγων
471
mvp-comment-227-1
ἐνταῦθα
472
mvp-comment-227-2
ἔνθα μή ποτε … προσόψει
473
mvp-comment-227-3
ζῶσα
474
mvp-comment-227-4
κατηρεφεῖ
475
mvp-comment-227-5
χθονὸς τῆσδ’ ἐκτὸς
476
mvp-comment-227-6
ὑμνήσεις
477
mvp-comment-228-1
πρὸς ταῦτα
478
mvp-comment-228-2
Nauck reads
κοὔ
479
καί
480
mvp-comment-228-3
ἐν καλῷ, εὔκαιρον
schol.:
H. 4. 3. 5
νομίσαντες οὐκ ἐν καλῷ εἶναι πρὸς τοὺς ὁπλίτας ἱππομαχεῖν
: so, too,
Eur.
Heracl. 971
, etc. Cp.
καλόν
(
ἐστι
)=
καίριον
in
Soph.
Ph. 1155
; and
εἰς καλόν
=
καιρίως
in
O.T. 78.
mvp-comment-229-1
ἦ ταῦτα δὴ
481
ἦ … δὴ
482
ἦ … γὰρ
483
mvp-comment-229-2
καὶ βεβούλευνται
484
mvp-comment-230-1
ἀλλ’ ἐξίκοιτο
485
mvp-comment-230-2
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκ’
486
mvp-comment-231-1
τίνα … τόνδ’
487
mvp-comment-231-2
τάλαινα
488
mvp-comment-232-1
εἴ τι τῶνδε
489
mvp-comment-233-1
ποῦ ποτ’ εἶ φρενῶν
490
mvp-comment-234-1
ὅπως
491
ὑμῶν
492
mvp-comment-234-2
προσώτατ’
493
προσωτάτω φύγω
494
mvp-comment-235-1
βίου … τοῦ παρόντος
495
mvp-comment-236-1
καλὸς γὰρ
496
mvp-comment-236-2
θαυμάσαι
497
mvp-comment-237-1
τοῖς φίλοις
498
mvp-comment-238-1
εἰκαθεῖν
499
mvp-comment-239-1
ταῦτα
500
οὐκ ἐμοὺς
501
mvp-comment-240-1
γε
502
μέντοι
503
mvp-comment-240-2
μὴ )ξ
504
mvp-comment-240-3
πεσεῖν
505
mvp-comment-240-4
399 A woman, speaking of herself in the plur., uses the masc.:
Ant. 926
παθόντες ἂν ξυγγνοῖμεν ἡμαρτηκότες
.
mvp-comment-241-1
συγγνώμην
506
mvp-comment-242-1
τἄπη
507
mvp-comment-242-2
πρὸς κακῶν
508
mvp-comment-243-1
μή πω
509
mvp-comment-244-1
οἷπερ … ὁδοῦ
510
mvp-comment-245-1
τῷ φέρεις
511
mvp-comment-245-2
ἔμπυρα
512
mvp-comment-246-1
τυμβεῦσαι χοάς
513
mvp-comment-247-1
βροτῶν
514
mvp-comment-248-1
ὃν ἔκταν’ αὐτή
515
ὅν γ’
516
mvp-comment-249-1
τῷ τοῦτ’ ἤρεσεν
517
mvp-comment-250-1
δείματος
518
mvp-comment-250-2
δοκεῖν ἐμοί
519
mvp-comment-251-1
θεοὶ πατρῷοι
520
mvp-comment-251-2
συγγένεσθέ γ’
521
mvp-comment-251-3
ἀλλὰ νῦν
522
mvp-comment-252-1
εἴποιμ’ ἂν τότε
523
mvp-comment-253-1
ἐπὶ σμικρὸν
524
ἐπὶ σμικρῶν
525
mvp-comment-253-2
φράσαι
526
mvp-comment-254-1
σμικροὶ λόγοι
527
mvp-comment-255-1
πατρὸς … δευτέραν ὁμιλίαν
528
mvp-comment-255-2
ἐφέστιον πῆξαι
529
mvp-comment-255-3
This sceptre is described in the
Iliad (2. 101 f.) as the work of Hephaestus, who gave it Zeus; Hermes transmitted it to Pelops, from whom it passed to Atreus and Agamemnon. The Homeric sceptre is often called
χρύσεον
(
Il. 2. 268
, etc.), prob. as being ornamented with gold foil, or studded with gold nails (
Il. 1. 246
χρυσείοις ἥλοισι πεπαρμένον
). Among the objects found at Mycenae are some supposed remains of such sceptres (Schliem.,
Myc. 201, etc.).
mvp-comment-255-4
οὑφόρει ποτέ
530
mvp-comment-256-1
ἔκ τε
531
ἐκ δὲ
532
mvp-comment-256-2
βρύοντα
533
mvp-comment-256-3
ᾧ … γενέσθαι
534
mvp-comment-256-4
The vision resembles that of Astyages, who dreamed that a vine sprang from his daughter Mandanè, the wife of Cambyses,
τὴν δὲ ἄμπελον ἐπισχεῖν τὴν Ἀσίην πᾶσαν
. The
ὀνειροπόλοι
explained this to mean that her son (Cyrus) should reign in his grandfather's stead. (
Her. 1. 108.
) The spreading branches figure also in the dream of Xerxes (7. 19):
ἐδόκεε...ἐστεφανῶσθαι ἐλαίης θαλλῷ, ἀπὸ δὲ τῆς ἐλαίης τοὺς κλάδους γῆν πᾶσαν ἐπισχεῖν
.
mvp-comment-256-5
In choosing the
sceptre of Agamemnon as the stock from which the wondrous growth is put forth, Sophocles may have had in mind the words of Achilles (
Il. 1. 234
ff.);
ναὶ μὰ τόδε σκῆπτρον· τὸ μὲν οὔποτε φύλλα καὶ ὄζους
|
φύσει, ἐπεὶ δὴ πρῶτα τομὴν ἐν ὄρεσσι λέλοιπεν
, |
οὐδ’ ἀναθηλήσει
.
mvp-comment-257-1
του παρόντος
535
τοῦ
536
παρόντος
537
του
538
mvp-comment-257-2
Ἡλίῳ δείκνυσι τοὖναρ
539
mvp-comment-258-1
οὐ κάτοιδα, πλὴν
540
mvp-comment-258-2
πέμπει με κείνη
541
mvp-comment-259-1
These three verses, which the MSS. give to Electra, and which several recent critics reject (cr. n.), clearly belong to Chrysothemis, and are genuine. Electra's exclamation of joy (411) caused Chrysothemis to ask if her sister had any ground for hope (412). Electra replied that, when she had heard the dream, she would say. This showed her sister that Electra relied merely on the fact that Clytaemnestra had seen
some fearful vision. Now, therefore, instead of asking for Electra's interpretation, she merely repeats her counsel (383 f.) before proceeding on her errand. The words
πρός
νυν θεῶν κ.τ.λ.
(428 ff.) show the train of her thought. To Chrysothemis, the alarm of Clytaemnestra (427) is more important than the apparition of Agamemnon. The dream is only a new reason why Electra should be cautious,—not why she should hope.
mvp-comment-259-2
The current ascription of the verses to Electra was doubtless prompted by verse 413. It was supposed that the recital of Chrysothemis must be immediately followed by the comments of Electra. But, as Hermann observed, the phrase
ἀβουλίᾳ πεσεῖν
would alone suffice to show that the verses belong to Chrysothemis (
cp. 398
). Nor could the warning,
σὺν κακῷ μέτει πάλιν
, be fitly uttered by Electra.
mvp-comment-259-3
τῶν ἐγγενῶν
542
mvp-comment-260-1
ἀβουλίᾳ
543
mvp-comment-260-2
σὺν κακῷ
544
mvp-comment-260-3
μέτει
545
mvp-comment-261-1
ἀλλ’
546
mvp-comment-261-2
ὦ φίλη
547
τούτων μὲν
548
mvp-comment-262-1
οὐ … θέμις
549
οὐδ’ ὅσιον
550
mvp-comment-262-2
ἐχθρᾶς ἀπὸ γυναικὸς
551
mvp-comment-262-3
κτερίσματ’
552
mvp-comment-262-4
λουτρὰ
553
mvp-comment-263-1
ἀλλ’ ἢ πνοαῖσιν
554
ῥοαῖσιν
555
mvp-comment-263-2
κρύψον
556
mvp-comment-263-3
νιν
557
mvp-comment-263-4
ἔνθα μή ποτ’
558
ἔνθεν
559
mvp-comment-263-5
εὐνὴν
560
mvp-comment-264-1
ἀλλ’ ὅταν θάῃν
561
mvp-comment-264-2
The conjecture
ἔστ’ ἂν
562
ὅταν
563
σῳζέσθω
564
mvp-comment-264-3
κειμήλἰ
565
mvp-comment-265-1
ἀρχὴν
566
τλημονεστάτη
567
mvp-comment-266-1
ἔβλαστε
568
mvp-comment-267-1
ὅν γ’ … τῷδ’
569
mvp-comment-267-2
ἐπέστεφε
570
mvp-comment-267-3
442 f. The position of
αὐτῇ
571
mvp-comment-267-4
δέξεσθαι
572
mvp-comment-267-5
It seems, then, a reasonable inference that here, where the reference is to future time, he would have written
δέξεσθαι
573
δέξασθαι
574
mvp-comment-267-6
444 ff. Join
θανὼν ἄτιμος
575
mvp-comment-267-7
ἐμασχαλίσθη
576
mvp-comment-267-8
Two different motives are assigned by the Greek commentators; viz.:—(1) the desire to render the dead incapable of wreaking vengeance (
ὥσπερ τὴν δύναμιν ἐκείνων ἀφαιρούμενοι
): (2) the desire to make an atonement (
ἐξιλάσασθαι τὴν δολοφονίαν—ἀφοσιοῦσθαι τὸν φόνον
). There can be little doubt that the first of these motives was the primitive origin of the custom. If the second was afterwards blended with it, the idea may have been that of offering the severed portions to the gods below,—as a victim was devoted to death by cutting off a lock of hair (
Eur.
Alc. 75
). Apollonius Rhodius seems to present the practice in this light (4. 477): Jason, having slain a foe,
ἐξάργματα τάμνε θανόντος
. Cp.
Etym. Magn.:
ἀπάργματα λέγεται τὰ ὑπὸ τῶν τραγῳδῶν λεγόμενα μασχαλίσματα
.
mvp-comment-267-9
κἀπὶ λουτροῖσιν
577
mvp-comment-267-10
ἐξέμαξ ν
578
mvp-comment-267-11
ἆρα μὴ
579
mvp-comment-268-1
οὐκ ἔστιν
580
mvp-comment-268-2
ταῦτα μὲν μέθες· σὺ δὲ
581
mvp-comment-269-1
βοστρύχων ἄκρας φόβας
582
mvp-comment-269-2
κἀμοῦ ταλαίνης
583
mvp-comment-270-1
†ἀλιπαρῆ
584
λιπαρῆ
585
mvp-comment-270-2
We come, therefore, to a dilemma. (1) The words
τήνδ’ ἀλιπαρῆ τρίχα
may conceal some corruption:
τήνδ’
ought possibly to be
τήνδε τ’
586
ἀλίπαρον
587
mvp-comment-270-3
(2) Or else, if the text be sound,
ἀλιπαρῆ
may mean
οὐ λιπαράν
. There is no doubt that
λιπ
, ‘fat,’ is the root both of
λι^παρός
, ‘shining,’ and of
λι—παρής
, ‘sticking’; cp.
Plat.
Crat. 427 B
τὸ λιπαρὸν καὶ τὸ κολλῶδες
(
Curt.
Etym. § 340
). Similarly
γλίσχρος
, ‘sticky,’ came to mean ‘importunate.’ It is barely possible that, in coining a new negative compound, the poet may have transferred the sense of
λιπαρός
to
λιπαρής
: but it seems improbable.
mvp-comment-271-1
ζῶμα
588
mvp-comment-271-2
χλιδαῖς
589
mvp-comment-272-1
προσπίτνουσα
590
αὐτὸν
591
mvp-comment-273-1
ἐξ ὑπερτέρας χερός
592
mvp-comment-273-2
ζῶντ’
593
mvp-comment-274-1
ἀφνεωτέραις
594
mvp-comment-274-2
στέφωμεν
595
mvp-comment-274-3
δωρούμεθα
596
mvp-comment-275-1
οἶμαι μὲν οὖν
597
mvp-comment-275-2
If
μέλον
598
μέλειν
599
μέλον
600
mvp-comment-276-1
σοί
601
mvp-comment-277-1
βροτῶν
602
mvp-comment-278-1
πρὸς εὐσέβειαν
603
mvp-comment-279-1
δράσω
604
mvp-comment-279-2
τὸ γὰρ δίκαιον
605
mvp-comment-279-3
(1)
τὸ δίκαιον
is an acc. of general reference, and
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
is impersonal. ‘With regard to what is (clearly) right, it is unreasonable for two persons to dispute; rather both should hasten on the doing (of it).’ With
ἀλλ’ ἐπισπεύδειν
we supply the notion
δεῖ
from the negative
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
(as from
οὐκ ἔξεστι
in
O. C. 1402
ff.; cp.
O. T. 817
ff.). For the form of the sentence, cp.
H. 7. 3. 7
τοὺς περὶ Ἀρχίαν...οὐ ψῆφον ἀνεμείνατε, ἀλλὰ ὁπότε πρῶτον ἐδυνάσθητε ἐτιμωρήσασθε
. So here the acc.
τὸ δίκαιον
, which represents the object of
δρᾶν
, is separated from it by the parenthesis
οὐκ
ἔχει λόγον δυοῖν ἐρίζειν
. (The first scholium gives substantially this view:
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον φιλονεικεῖν περὶ τοῦ δικαίου, ὥστε περὶ αὐτοῦ δύο ὄντας ἐρίζειν
.)
mvp-comment-279-4
(2) Or
τὸ δίκαιον
might be nom.: ‘that which is clearly right does not
afford any ground (
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
) for two persons to dispute,’ etc. So the second schol.:
ἢ τὸ οὐκ ἔχει λόγον ἀντὶ τοῦ οὐ παρέχει πρόφασιν
. So far as the verb
ἔχει
is concerned, this sense is quite admissible: cp.
Thuc. 2. 41
οὔτε τῷ πολεμίῳ ἐπελθόντι ἀγανάκτησιν ἔχει
(
ἡ πόλις
). The objection is that the phrases
ἔχειν λόγον, οὐκ ἔχειν λόγον
, which are very common, regularly mean, ‘to be reasonable,’ ‘to be unreasonable.’ This is so both in the personal and in the impersonal constr.; as Plat.
Phaedop. 62 D
τὸ γὰρ μὴ ἀγανακτεῖν...οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
:
Dem. or. 36 § 54
πῶς ἔχει λόγον σὲ...δίκην ἀξιοῦν λαμβάνειν
; The supposed sense, ‘not to
afford a reason,’ is unexampled.
mvp-comment-279-5
δυοῖν
606
mvp-comment-280-1
παρ’ ὑμῶν
607
mvp-comment-281-1
πικρὰν
608
δοκῶ με … τολμήσειν
609
ἔτι
610
mvp-comment-282-1
εἰ μὴ )γὼ
611
mvp-comment-282-2
γνώμας λειπομένα
612
mvp-comment-283-1
ἁ πρόμαντις Δίκα
613
mvp-comment-283-2
δίκαια φερομένα χεροῖν κράτη
614
mvp-comment-284-1
μέτεισιν
615
mvp-comment-284-2
οὐ μακροῦ χρόνου
616
mvp-comment-285-1
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
617
κλύουσαν
618
mvp-comment-285-2
ἁδυπνόων … ὀνειράτων
619
mvp-comment-286-1
ἀμναστεῖ γ’ ὁ φύσας ς’
620
mvp-comment-287-1
χαλκόπλακτος
621
mvp-comment-287-2
γένυς
622
mvp-comment-287-3
The very axe (
φόνιος πέλεκυς
, 99) with which the blow was dealt is imagined as nourishing a grudge against the murderers who had set it such a task. Such a personification recalls that practice of Athenian law by which inanimate objects which had caused death were brought to a formal trial in the court called
τὸ ἐπὶ Πρυτανείῳ
, and, after sentence, cast beyond the boundaries, in the presence of the Archon Basileus and the sacrificial officers of the tribes (
φυλο‐
βασιλεῖς
). Aeschin. or. 3 § 244
τὰ μὲν ξύλα καὶ τοὺς λίθους καὶ τὸν σίδηρον, τὰ ἄφωνα καὶ ἀγνώμονα, ἐάν τῳ ἐμπεσόντα ἀποκτείνῃ, ὑπερορίζομεν
. (Cp.
Dem. or. 23 § 76
.) A like conception was implied in the English law (repealed in 1846) of ‘deodands’ (Deo danda),
i.e., personal chattels (whether animals or things) which, having caused the death of a human being, were forfeited to the Crown for pious uses.
mvp-comment-288-1
ἐν αἰκίαις
623
mvp-comment-289-1
καὶ πολύπους καὶ πολύχειρ
624
mvp-comment-290-1
λόχοις
625
mvp-comment-290-2
χαλκόπους
626
mvp-comment-291-1
ἄλεκτρ’ ἄνυμφα
627
mvp-comment-291-2
γάμων ἁμιλλήμαθ’
628
mvp-comment-291-3
ἐπέβα
629
mvp-comment-292-1
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι … συνδρῶσιν
630
mvp-comment-292-2
Verses 495—497 (
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι...τέρας
) answer metrically to vv. 479—481
ὕπεστί μοι...ὀνειράτων
, where the text is certain, save for the doubt whether
θράσος
or
θάρσος
should stand in 479. Here we must first decide two points.
mvp-comment-292-3
(1) Are the words
πρὸ τῶνδε
631
mvp-comment-292-4
(2) Could
ἔχει με, μήποτε τέρας πελᾶν
(etc.) mean, ‘
the belief possesses me, that’ etc.? Surely not. No real parallel for so strange a phrase has been produced. It is irrelevant to quote those impersonal verbs which directly express the
occurrence of a thought to the mind; as
Xen.
An. 6. 1. 17
εἰσῄει αὐτοὺς ὅπως ἂν καὶ ἔχοντές τι οἴκαδε ἀφίκοιντο
(‘the thought came to them, how they might,’ etc.):
Thuc. 6. 78.
§ 1
εἰ δέ τῳ ἄρα παρέστηκε, τὸν μὲν Συρακόσιον...πολέμιον εἶναι κ.τ.λ.
Either, then, the subject to
ἔχει
has dropped out, or the words
μ’ ἔχει
conceal a corruption.
mvp-comment-292-5
The following remedies are possible: I incline to the first, as involving least change. (1) Reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
, we may read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοί μ’ ἔχει
|
<θάρσος τι>, μήποθ’ ἡμῖν
etc. (It may be remarked that
τι
is in harmony with the tone of
ὕπεστί μοι
in 479.) Another available word is
ξύννοια
(cp.
Ant. 279
). (2) Or, reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θάρσος
, we could read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι θάρσος ἴσχει με
. On either view, the
υ
of
ἁδυπνόων
in 480 is long (as several critics have assumed). It should be noted that (1) involves a different constitution of the verses: see p. lxxxii.
mvp-comment-292-6
In those MSS. which have
μή ποτε μή ποθ’ ἡμῖν
632
mvp-comment-293-1
ἀψεγές
633
ἀψεφές
634
mvp-comment-293-2
πελᾶν
635
mvp-comment-294-1
τοῖς δρῶσι
636
τοῖς συνδρῶσιν
637
mvp-comment-295-1
μαντεῖαι βροτῶν
638
mvp-comment-296-1
εὖ κατασχήσει
639
mvp-comment-297-1
ἱππεία
640
mvp-comment-297-2
Oenomaüs, king of Pisa in Elis, had promised the hand of his daughter Hippodameia to the suitor who should defeat him in a chariot-race; the penalty of failure being death. The young Pelops, son of Tantalus, offered himself as a competitor. Myrtilus, the charioteer of Oenomaüs, was persuaded (either by Hippodameia or by Pelops) to betray his master. He did so by leaving out one or both of the linch-pins by which the naves of the chariot-wheels were secured to the axles.
Tzetzes on Lycophron 156
ταῖς χοινίκισι
(=
πλήμναις
, the naves)
τῶν τροχῶν οὐκ ἐμβαλὼν τοὺς ἥλους
. According to another story, he substituted a linch-pin of wax for a real one (
schol. Apoll. Rh. 752
ἐμβαλόντα κήρινον ἔμβολον ἐπὶ τοῦ ἀκραξονίου
). So Pelops won the race, and the bride. But Oenomaüs was soon avenged on the traitor; for Myrtilus insulted Hippodameia, and was thrown into the sea by Pelops; upon whose house he invoked a curse, as he sank.
mvp-comment-297-3
Euripides, too, (
Or. 990
ff.,
Helen. 386 f.) refers to this chariot-race as the event with which the troubles of the Pelopidae began. Apollonius Rhodius briefly describes the critical moment of the race as one of the subjects embroidered on the cloak of Jason (1. 752 ff.); there Oenomaüs was seen, ‘falling sideways, as the axle broke at the naves of the wheels,’—
ἄξονος ἐν πλήμνῃσι παρακλιδὸν ἀγνυμένοιο
|
πίπτεν
.
mvp-comment-297-4
The eastern pediment of the temple of Zeus at Olympia (
circ. 450 B.C.) was adorned with sculptures by Paeonius, representing the preparation for this contest (
Paus. 5. 10. 6
). The fragments found on the site have sufficed for a reconstruction of the group. Zeus occupied the centre; to the right of him were Pelops and Hippodameia; to the left, Oenomaüs and his wife Steropè. On each side was a chariot drawn by four horses. Myrtilus was sitting in front of his team, with his face turned away from his master.
mvp-comment-297-5
In the older and nobler form of the myth, Pelops won, not by a fraud, but by the grace of Poseidon, who gave him winged horses (Pindar
O. 1. 87
ἔδωκεν δίφρον τε χούσεον πτεροῖσίν τ’ ἀκάμαντας ἵππους
). On the chest (
λάρναξ
) of Cypselus, seen by Pausanias in the Heraeum at Olympia (
Paus. 5. 17. 5
), Pelops was driving two winged horses.
mvp-comment-298-1
αἰανὴς
641
mvp-comment-298-2
The form
αἰανὴς
has the best authority, and some critics hold that
αἰανὸς
(Hesych.) was a Byzantine invention. But in
Aesch.
Eum. 416
,
ἡμεῖς γάρ ἐσμεν νυκτὸς αἰανῆς τέκνα
(so L, schol., and Tzetzes on Lycophron 406),
αἰανῆ
is far less suitable.
mvp-comment-299-1
εὖτε
642
mvp-comment-299-2
ὁ ποντισθεὶς Μυρτίλος
643
mvp-comment-299-3
A vase found at Capua shows Pelops and Hippodameia in a ship, from which Myrtilus is falling backwards into the water. A winged Erinys hovers in the air above, brandishing a sword over the head of Pelops (Baumeister,
Denkmäler p. 1204, referring to
Mon. Inst. x. 25).
mvp-comment-299-4
ἐκοιμάθη
644
mvp-comment-300-1
παγχρυσέων δίφρων
645
mvp-comment-301-1
πρόρριζος
646
mvp-comment-301-2
ἐκριφθείς
647
mvp-comment-302-1
ἔλειπεν
648
ἔλιπεν
649
οἴκου
650
οἴκους
651
πω
652
mvp-comment-303-1
πολύπονος
653
αἰκία
654
mvp-comment-304-1
ἀνειμένη
655
μέν
656
mvp-comment-304-2
ὡς ἔοικας
657
mvp-comment-304-3
στρέφει
658
mvp-comment-304-4
Clytaemnestra begins in the same strain as Chrysothemis, who likewise emphasised her reproof by the word
αὖ
659
mvp-comment-305-1
μή τοι θυραίαν γ’
660
mvp-comment-305-2
αἰσχύνειν φίλους
661
mvp-comment-306-1
καίτοι
662
mvp-comment-306-2
δὴ
663
πολλούς
664
mvp-comment-306-3
ἐξεῖπάς με … ὡς
665
mvp-comment-306-4
θρασεῖα
666
τραχεῖα
667
mvp-comment-306-5
ἄρχω
668
mvp-comment-307-1
ὕβριν … οὐκ ἔχω
669
κακῶς κλύουσα
670
mvp-comment-308-1
πατὴρ γάρ
671
mvp-comment-308-2
πρόσχημα
672
mvp-comment-309-1
ἡ γὰρ Δίκη
673
mvp-comment-310-1
ᾗ χρῆν σ’ ἀρήγειν
674
mvp-comment-311-1
The order of words in the MSS.,
ἐπεὶ πατὴρ οὗτος σός
, is probably right; the words would then fall from her with a certain deliberate bitterness.
Cp. 542
:
Ant. 44
ἦ γὰρ νοεῖς θάπτειν σθ’
(n.):
Ph. 101
λέγω σ’ ἐγὼ δόλῳ Φιλοκτήτην λαβεῖν
.
mvp-comment-312-1
μοῦνος
675
Ἑλλήνων
676
mvp-comment-312-2
Nauck requires
τὴν αὐτὸς αὑτοῦ
instead of
τὴν σὴν ὅμαιμον
, because Agamemnon's unique crime was the slaughter of his own child: as if the text did not convey this. Clytaemnestra means, ‘while mourning a father, you forget a sister.’
mvp-comment-312-3
532 f. The regular mode of expression would be,
οὐκ ἴσον λύπης καμὼν ἐμοί, ὁ σπείρας τῇ τικτούσῃ
. But, having written
ὅτ’ ἔσπειρε
, the poet explains
ἐμοί
by repeating the comparison in a new form,
ὥσπερ ἡ τίκτουσ’ ἐγώ
. (For
ὡς
or
ὥσπερ
after
ἴσος
, cp.
Lys. or. 19 § 36
ἡγοῦντο... τὰ ἐκεῖ...εἶναι ἴσα ὥσπερ τὰ ἐνθάδε
.) Those who reject v. 533 omit to notice that, without it, the words
οὐκ ἴσον καμὼν ἐμοί
would be unintelligible. Cp.
Aesch.
Ag. 1417
ἔθυσεν αὑτοῦ παῖδα, φιλτάτην ἐμοὶ
|
ὠδῖν’
.
mvp-comment-312-4
This assertion of the mother's superior claim is a counterpart to the doctrine of Athena in
Aesch.
Eum. 658
f.,
οὐκ ἔστι μήτηρ ἡ κεκλημένου τέκνου
|
τοκεύς, τροφὸς δὲ κύματος νεοσπόρου
. Cp. above,
Aesch. Eum. 366
n.
mvp-comment-313-1
τοῦ χάριν, τίνων
677
mvp-comment-313-2
The alternative, which most editors have preferred, is to take
τίνων
as the participle. But there is an insuperable objection to this, which seems to have escaped notice. The words,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could mean only, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
for what?’ They could not mean, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
to whom?’ The latter would be
τῷ χάριν τίνων
; See (
e.g.)
Aesch.
P. V. 985
καὶ μὴν ὀφείλων ἂν τίνοιμ’ αὐτῷ χάριν
:
Aesch.
Ag. 821
τούτων θεοῖσι χρὴ πολύμνηστον χάριν
|
τίνειν
. Hence the question,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could not possibly be answered by
Ἀργείων
. For, evidently, the latter word could not mean, (‘for a benefit conferred by) the Greeks.’ A scholiast in the Baroccian MS. (cr. n. on 545), who explains
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
by
τίνος χάριν ἀποδιδούς
, plainly meant, ‘showing gratitude for what?’—and his paraphrase was correct; only he overlooked the context.
mvp-comment-314-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ μετῆν
678
mvp-comment-315-1
ἀλλ’ ἀντ’ ἀδελφοῦ δῆτα
679
κτανὼν
680
mvp-comment-315-2
ἀντὶ ἀδελφοῦ
681
mvp-comment-315-3
τἄμ’
682
mvp-comment-316-1
παῖδες … διπλοῖ
683
mvp-comment-316-2
540 f. Nauck would prefer a single verse in place of these two, viz.
οὓς Ἰφιγενείας εἰκὸς ἦν θνῄσκειν πάρος
.
mvp-comment-317-1
ἢ
684
mvp-comment-317-2
ἢ τῶν ἐμῶν Ἅιδης
685
mvp-comment-318-1
δαίσασθαι
686
mvp-comment-318-2
The conj.
λῄσασθαι
687
mvp-comment-319-1
πανώλει
688
mvp-comment-319-2
παρεῖτο
689
mvp-comment-319-3
The sense does not absolutely require us to take
Μενέλεω δ’
690
mvp-comment-320-1
ἀβούλου
691
mvp-comment-320-2
κακοῦ γνώμην
692
mvp-comment-321-1
δοκῶ μέν
693
mvp-comment-321-2
εἰ καὶ
694
mvp-comment-322-1
εἰ φωνὴν λάβοι
695
mvp-comment-323-1
τοῖς πεπραγμένοις
696
mvp-comment-324-1
γνώμην δικαίαν σχοῦσα
697
mvp-comment-325-1
ἐρεῖς μὲν οὐχὶ
698
ἐρεῖς
699
ἐρεῖς … μ’ ὡς
700
mvp-comment-325-2
ἄρξασά τι λυπηρὸν
701
mvp-comment-325-3
τάδ’ ἐξήκους’
702
mvp-comment-326-1
τοῦ τεθνηκότος θ’ ὕπερ
703
mvp-comment-327-1
καὶ μὴν
704
mvp-comment-327-2
λόγους ἐξῆρχές με
705
mvp-comment-328-1
Clytaemnestra has argued that she was justified in slaying Agamemnon, because he had slain Iphigeneia. The topics of Electra's reply are as follows.
mvp-comment-328-2
(1) 558—562. The wife who slew her husband would be a criminal, even if the motive had been just retribution; but the real motive was her love for Aegisthus. (2) 563—576. Agamemnon was not a free agent in slaying Iphigeneia; the act was forced upon him by Artemis. (3) 577—583. Suppose, however, that he was a free agent, and wished to please his brother; still she was not justified in taking his life. (4) 584—594. And in any case her plea does not excuse her for living with the man who helped to slay her husband.—The speech then closes in a strain of reproach and defiance (595 —609).
mvp-comment-328-3
καὶ δὴ λέγω σοι
706
πατέρα
707
φὴς
708
mvp-comment-329-1
εἴτ’ οὖν … εἴτε
709
mvp-comment-329-2
λέξω
710
δείξω
711
mvp-comment-330-1
ὡς οὐ δίκῃ γ’
712
ἔσπασεν
713
πειθὼ
714
mvp-comment-331-1
κυναγὸν
715
mvp-comment-331-2
ποινὰς
716
mvp-comment-331-3
τὰ πολλὰ πνεύματ’ ἔσχ’
717
τὰ πολλὰ
718
ἔσχε
719
mvp-comment-331-4
Acc. to Aesch. (
Aesch.
Ag. 149
f.,
Aesch. Ag. 192
), the Greeks were detained by
adverse winds, blowing from the N.E. : and this seems to have been the account given in the
Cypria (
c. 776 B.C.), Proclus
Chrest. p. 455:
ἐπέσχεν αὐτοὺς τοῦ πλοῦ χειμῶνας ἐπιπέμπουσα
. But other authorities speak of a
calm. Thus
I. A. 9 ff.
οὔκουν φθόγγος γ’ οὔτ’ ὀρνίθων
|
οὔτε θαλάσσης· σιγαὶ δ’ ἀνέμων
|
τόνδε κατ’ Εὔριπον ἔχουσιν
. Schol.
Eur.
Or. 647
ἐπειράθη τῆς θεοῦ ὀργιζομένης καὶ κατεχούσης τοὺς ἀνέμους
. Tzetzes on Lycophron 183
χολωθεῖσα δ’ ἐπὶ τούτῳ ἡ θεὸς τοὺς ἀνέμους κατέσχεν
. Ovid (
Met. 13. 183
) combines both versions:
exspectata diu, nulla aut contraria classi | Flamina sunt.
mvp-comment-331-5
It has been objected that vessels provided with oars need not have been detained by a calm. But the ships of the Greek fleet were not light craft. Each carried from 50 to 120 armed men, besides
σκεύη πολεμικά
: and the warriors were also the rowers (cp.
Thuc. 1. 10
). It is intelligible, then, that they should await the aid of wind before attempting the passage of the Aegaean. We must remember, too, the strong and shifting currents in the Euripus (
στονόεντα πορθμόν
,
Soph.
Ant. 1145
:
παλιρρόχθοις ἐν Αὐλίδος τόποις
,
Aesch.
Ag. 191
).
mvp-comment-331-6
We cannot well render:—(1)‘He
suffered those tedious winds,’—supplying
ὁ πατήρ
from v. 558. Nor: (2) ‘She
directed those tedious winds at Aulis,’—a version which would at least require
ἐπ’ Αὐλίδι
. Cp.
Ph. 1119
ἔχε
|
δύσποτμον ἀρὰν ἐπ’ ἄλλοις
.
mvp-comment-331-7
The conjecture
πλοῖα
720
mvp-comment-331-8
Αὐλίδι
721
mvp-comment-332-1
ἢ )γὼ φράσω
722
κείνης
723
mvp-comment-333-1
ὡς ἐγὼ κλύω
724
mvp-comment-333-2
θεᾶς … κατ’ ἄλσος
725
mvp-comment-333-3
παίζων
726
mvp-comment-333-4
ποδοῖν
727
mvp-comment-334-1
ἔλαφον
728
mvp-comment-334-2
στικτὸν
729
mvp-comment-334-3
κεράστην
730
mvp-comment-334-4
οὗ κατὰ σφαγὰς
731
mvp-comment-335-1
ἐκκομπάσας ἔπος τι τυγχάνει
732
βαλών
733
mvp-comment-335-2
This is the reason against taking
τυγχάνει
with
βαλών
, as=‘he shoots and hits’; cp.
Il. 15. 581
θηρητὴρ ἐτύχησε βαλών
:
Her. 3. 35
εἰ...τοῦ παιδὸς...βαλὼν τύχοιμι
. The vaunt must then
precede the hit.
mvp-comment-335-3
Others take
βαλὼν
734
ἔπος
735
mvp-comment-335-4
Monk, with Musgrave, took
σφαγὰς
736
mvp-comment-336-1
ἐκ τοῦδε
737
mvp-comment-336-2
μηνίσασα
738
mvp-comment-336-3
Λητῴα κόρη
739
mvp-comment-337-1
ὡς
740
ἀντίσταθμον
741
mvp-comment-337-2
ἐκθύσειε
742
mvp-comment-338-1
ὧδ’ ἦν
743
mvp-comment-338-2
τὰ … θύματ’
744
mvp-comment-338-3
λύσις
745
mvp-comment-338-4
πρὸς οἶκον
746
mvp-comment-339-1
πολλὰ
747
mvp-comment-339-2
ἀντιβὰς
748
mvp-comment-339-3
μόλις
749
mvp-comment-340-1
εἰ δ’ οὖν
750
mvp-comment-340-2
ἐρῶ γὰρ καὶ τὸ σόν
751
mvp-comment-341-1
τούτου … οὕνεκ’
752
mvp-comment-341-2
νόμῳ
753
mvp-comment-342-1
ὅρα
754
μὴ … τιθῇς
755
τίθης
756
mvp-comment-342-2
Here, either
τίθης
or
τιθῇς
would be suitable. (1) With
τίθης
:—‘See that, in making this rule, you
are not making woe for yourself.’ This means that to make the rule (as she is doing) is at once (logically) to make the woe. (2) With
τιθῇς
: —‘See
lest, in making this rule, you
make woe for yourself’:
i.e., the rule may have the woe as a consequence. The woe is a future contingency (583
εἰ δίκης γε τυγχάνοις
), against which Electra warns her. On the whole, I now prefer
τιθῇς
.
Cp. 1003
ὅρα κακῶς πράσσοντε μὴ μείζω κακὰ
|
κτησώμεθ’
: fr. 82
ἀλλ’ ὅρα μὴ κρεῖσσον ᾖ
.
mvp-comment-342-3
τιθεῖσα … νόμον
757
mvp-comment-343-1
εἰ γὰρ κτενοῦμεν
758
mvp-comment-343-2
πρώτη
759
mvp-comment-344-1
εἰσόρα
760
mvp-comment-344-2
οὐκ οὖσαν
761
mvp-comment-344-3
τίθης
762
mvp-comment-344-4
εἰ … θέλεις
763
mvp-comment-345-1
τῷ παλαμναίῳ
764
mvp-comment-345-2
πρόσθεν ἐξαπώλεσας
765
mvp-comment-346-1
παιδοποιεῖς
766
mvp-comment-346-2
Erigonè, daughter of Aegisthus and Clytaemnestra (Tzetzes on
Lyc. 1374
), was mentioned by the early cyclic poet Cinaethon (
Paus. 2. 18. 6
), and was the theme of Sophocles in his
Ἠριγόνη
. Hyginus (
Hyg.
Fab. 122
) notices a son of Aegisthus named Aletes, who gives his name to a play by Sophocles, but does not record the mother: see p. xliii note 4.
mvp-comment-346-3
εὐσεβεῖς
767
mvp-comment-346-4
κἀξ εὐσεβῶν
768
mvp-comment-346-5
By
τοὺς...πρόσθεν εὐσεβεῖς
Electra means Orestes and herself. Both are ‘cast out’ of their just rights. Cp.
O.T. 611
φίλον ...ἐσθλὸν ἐκβαλεῖν
.
Eur.
El. 62
τεκοῦσα δ’ ἄλλους παῖδας Αἰγίσθῳ πάρα
|
πάρεργ’ Ὀρέστην κἀμὲ ποιεῖται δόμων.
mvp-comment-346-6
βλαστόντας
769
mvp-comment-346-7
ἐκβαλοῦσ’ ἔχεις
770
mvp-comment-347-1
πῶς ταῦτ’ ἐπαινέσαιμ’ ἄν
771
mvp-comment-347-2
ἢ
772
ἦ
773
καὶ τοῦτ’
774
ἄποινα
775
mvp-comment-348-1
αἰσχρῶς δ’
776
δ’
777
mvp-comment-348-2
ἐάν περ καὶ λέγῃς
778
mvp-comment-348-3
ἐχθροῖς γαμεῖσθαι
779
mvp-comment-348-4
These two verses, though not indispensable, seem genuine. Were they omitted, the transition from 592 to 595 would be somewhat abrupt.
mvp-comment-349-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ γὰρ
780
mvp-comment-349-2
πᾶσαν ἵης γλῶσσαν
781
mvp-comment-350-1
κακοστομοῦμεν
782
mvp-comment-350-2
καί σ’ ἔγωγε δεσπότιν
783
mvp-comment-350-3
εἰς ἡμᾶς
784
ἣ
785
mvp-comment-351-1
βίον μοχθηρόν
786
mvp-comment-351-2
ἔκ τε σοῦ
787
κακοῖς … ξυνοῦσα
788
mvp-comment-351-3
συννόμου
789
mvp-comment-352-1
ὁ δ’ ἄλλος
790
mvp-comment-352-2
χεῖρα σὴν
791
mvp-comment-352-3
τρίβει βίον
792
mvp-comment-352-4
603 The reason for writing
δή με σοὶ
793
δή μέ σοι
794
mvp-comment-352-5
μιάστορα
795
mvp-comment-353-1
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκα
796
mvp-comment-354-1
εἰς ἅπαντας
797
mvp-comment-354-2
χρῇς
798
mvp-comment-354-3
στόμαργον
799
mvp-comment-355-1
τῶνδε τῶν ἔ|ργων ἴδρις
800
mvp-comment-355-2
σχεδόν τι
801
mvp-comment-355-3
οὐ καταισχύνω
802
mvp-comment-356-1
ὁρῶ μένος πνέουσαν
803
μένος πνέουσαν
804
mvp-comment-356-2
σὺν δίκῃ ξύνεστι
805
mvp-comment-356-3
Other interpretations are:—(1) ‘I see that Electra is wroth; but as to whether she is in the right, I see no concern (anywhere),’—a timid way of saying that
Clytaemnestra shows no such concern. So the schol. (2) ‘I see that Clytaemnestra is angry, but not that she cares whether she is right’:—an inference from some gesture. Both these versions rely on the fact that
φροντίδος
(612) is plainly an echo of
φροντίδ’
(611). But: (
a) it does not follow that
φροντίδ’
is not
Electra's thought. (
b) It is surely clear that
πνέουσαν
must be Electra; and (
c) as in
Ant. 471
f., the second clause naturally refers to the same person.
mvp-comment-357-1
ποίας δ’ ἐμοὶ δεῖ
806
ἐμοὶ
807
μοι
808
δεῖ
809
mvp-comment-357-2
Others understand: (1) ‘If Electra has no consideration for justice, why should I have any consideration for her,—
i.e., show her any tenderness?’ Or: (2) ‘If she heeds not justice, why should I heed her?’ Neither view seems well suited to the context.
mvp-comment-358-1
καὶ ταῦτα
810
mvp-comment-358-2
τηλικοῦτος
811
mvp-comment-358-3
ἆρα
812
mvp-comment-358-4
χωρεῖν ἂν
813
εἰς πᾶν ἔργον
814
mvp-comment-359-1
εὖ νυν ἐπίστω
815
mvp-comment-359-2
ἔξωρα
816
mvp-comment-359-3
προσεικότα
817
mvp-comment-360-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
818
mvp-comment-360-2
ἡ … ἐκ σοῦ δυσμένεια
819
mvp-comment-360-3
ἐξαναγκάζει
820
αἰσχροῖς
821
mvp-comment-360-4
622 f. The word
θρέμμα
822
mvp-comment-360-5
ἦ σ’ ἐγὼ
823
mvp-comment-361-1
νιν
824
mvp-comment-361-2
εὑρίσκεται
825
mvp-comment-361-3
Cp. Milton,
Apology for Smectymnuus (in his
Prose Works, ed. Symmons, vol. I. p. 236): ‘I might also tell them [the prelates], what Electra in Sophocles, a wise virgin, answered her wicked mother, who thought herself too violently reproved by her the daughter: ‘'
Tis you that say it,
not I; you do the deeds, |
And your ungodly deeds find me the words.’’
mvp-comment-362-1
οὐ μὰ
826
mvp-comment-362-2
δέσποιναν
827
mvp-comment-362-3
Ἄρτεμιν
828
mvp-comment-362-4
θράσους τοῦδ’ οὐκ ἀλύξεις
829
μόλῃ
830
mvp-comment-363-1
ὁρᾷς
831
mvp-comment-363-2
ἐκφέρει
832
mvp-comment-363-3
The
v. l.
παρεῖσα
833
mvp-comment-364-1
οὐδὲ
834
mvp-comment-364-2
ὑπ’ εὐφήμου βοῆς
835
mvp-comment-364-3
ἐπειδὴ σοί γ’
836
mvp-comment-364-4
πᾶν λέγειν
837
mvp-comment-365-1
κελεύω
838
mvp-comment-365-2
τοὐμὸν στόμ’
839
mvp-comment-365-3
634 f. An altar, and probably an image, of Apollo stand before the palace. The attendant of Clytaemnestra carries offerings of various fruits, which she is now commanded to
raise, as with a gesture of solemn oblation (
ἔπαιρε
840
mvp-comment-365-4
ἡ παροῦσά μοι
841
mvp-comment-365-5
θύματα … πάγκαρπα
842
mvp-comment-366-1
λυτηρίους … δειμάτων
843
mvp-comment-366-2
ἀνάσχω
844
mvp-comment-367-1
κλύοις ἂν
845
mvp-comment-367-2
προστατήριε
846
mvp-comment-368-1
κεκρυμμένην
847
mvp-comment-368-2
οὐ γὰρ ἐν φίλοις
848