mvp-comment-22-1
χρῇ
1
τοιαῦθ’
2
ὧν
3
mvp-comment-22-2
ὁ Φοῖβος
4
mvp-comment-22-3
πεύσει
5
mvp-comment-22-4
This verse might seem the preface to some longer recital (cp.
Ph. 1418
n.). But in fact it is merely an emphatic prelude to the oracle:
τάχα
6
mvp-comment-23-1
αὐτὸν
7
ἀσπίδων
8
mvp-comment-23-2
ἀσπίδων τε καὶ στρατοῦ
9
δόλοισι
10
mvp-comment-23-3
χειρὸς
11
σφαγάς
12
mvp-comment-23-4
κλέψαι
13
mvp-comment-24-1
ὅτε
14
mvp-comment-24-2
σὺ μὲν μολὼν
15
mvp-comment-24-3
καιρὸς
16
mvp-comment-24-4
ἴσθι
17
mvp-comment-25-1
γήρᾳ
18
χρόνῳ μακρῷ
19
mvp-comment-25-2
οὐδ’ ὑποπτεύσουσιν
20
οὐ μὴ γνῶσι
21
mvp-comment-25-3
ὧδ’ ἠνθισμένον
22
mvp-comment-26-1
Φωκεύς
23
mvp-comment-26-2
ἀνδρὸς Φανοτέως. ἀνήρ
, thus prefixed to a proper name, serves either: (
a) to introduce a person not previously men tioned,—being more respectful than
τις
, as
Il. 11. 92
ἄνδρα Βιήνορα
,
Her. 8. 82
ἀνὴρ Παναίτιος
: or (
b) adds something of solemnity or pathos to the mention of a familiar name, as
Soph.
O. C. 109
ἀνδρὸς Οἰδίπου
,
Soph.
Ai. 817
ἀνδρὸς Ἕκτορος
.
mvp-comment-26-3
Phanoteus was the eponymous hero of the town Phanoteus (
Thuc. 4. 89
), or Panopeus (
Il. 2. 520
etc., Paus. , Strabo), in Phocis, close to the Boeotian frontier, —about three miles west of Chaeroneia, and as many east of Daulis. He was the brother of Crisus, from whom the town of Crisa in Phocis (about two miles w. s. w. of Delphi) took its name. Between these brothers, said the legend, there was a deadly feud; before birth they had struggled in the womb (Tzetzes,
Lycophr. 939: cp. Preller,
Griechische Mythologie, 2. p. 54 n. 5). Now Crisus was the father of Strophius, that king of Crisa who was the ally of Agamemnon, and with whom the young Orestes found a home. Hence Phanoteus, the foe of Crisus, is represented as the friend of Aegisthus and Clytaemnestra. He is the first to send them the glad tidings that Orestes is dead. On the other hand it is Strophius who is described as paying the last honours to the corpse, and sending the ashes to Mycenae (1111).
mvp-comment-26-4
ὁ γὰρ
24
mvp-comment-27-1
μέγιστος
25
mvp-comment-27-2
τυγχάνει
26
mvp-comment-27-3
δορυξένων
27
mvp-comment-28-1
ὅρκον
28
ὅρκῳ
29
mvp-comment-28-2
On the other hand, the phrase
προστιθέναι ὅρκον
has the authority of Sophocles himself: fr. 431
ὅρκου δὲ προστεθέντος ἐπιμελεστέρα
|
ψυχὴ κατέστη
. Cp. too
Tr. 255
ὅρκον αὑτῷ προσβαλών
.
mvp-comment-28-3
The false oath would be regarded as excused by the
δόλοι
which Apollo had prescribed (v. 37); but in fact the Paedagogus takes no such oath.
mvp-comment-29-1
ἀναγκαίας τύχης
30
mvp-comment-29-2
ἄθλοισι
31
Πυθικοῖσιν
32
mvp-comment-29-3
τροχηλάτων
33
mvp-comment-29-4
ἑστάτω
34
mvp-comment-30-1
ἐφίετο
35
mvp-comment-30-2
λοιβαῖσι
36
mvp-comment-30-3
καρατόμοις χλιδαῖς
37
mvp-comment-30-4
στέψαντες
38
mvp-comment-30-5
ἄψορρον … πάλιν
39
mvp-comment-31-1
τύπωμα
40
χαλκόπλευρον
41
mvp-comment-31-2
ἠρμένοι
42
mvp-comment-31-3
Others take
ἠρμένοι
as middle. This use of
ἦρμαι
is not unknown to later Greek;
e.g. Strabo 3. p. 150 has
νίκην ἠρμένοι
=
ἀράμενοι
. But there is no example of it in the classical period.
mvp-comment-32-1
Join
που
43
καὶ σὺ
44
mvp-comment-32-2
The
v.l.
μοι
45
mvp-comment-33-1
λόγῳ κλέπτοντες
46
mvp-comment-33-2
φέρωμεν
47
mvp-comment-33-3
ἔρρει
48
mvp-comment-33-4
δέμας
49
mvp-comment-34-1
τί γάρ με λυπεῖ
50
mvp-comment-34-2
ἔργοισι
51
mvp-comment-34-3
κἀξενέγκωμαι
52
mvp-comment-35-1
δοκῶ μέν
53
σὺν κέρδει
54
mvp-comment-35-2
κακόν
55
mvp-comment-36-1
πολλάκις
56
mvp-comment-36-2
λόγῳ μάτην θνῄσκοντας
57
mvp-comment-36-3
ἐκτετίμηνται
58
mvp-comment-37-1
ὡς
59
mvp-comment-37-2
κἄμ’ ἐπαυχῶ
60
mvp-comment-37-3
ἄπο
61
mvp-comment-37-4
δεδορκότ’
62
mvp-comment-37-5
ἐχθροῖς
63
λάμψειν
64
mvp-comment-37-6
ἄστρον
65
mvp-comment-37-7
ἔτι
66
mvp-comment-38-1
πατρῴα γῆ
67
mvp-comment-38-2
εὐτυχοῦντα
68
mvp-comment-38-3
ὁδοῖς
69
mvp-comment-39-1
καθαρτής
70
mvp-comment-39-2
πρὸς θεῶν ὡρμημένος
71
mvp-comment-40-1
ἀλλ’ ἀρχέπλουτον
72
mvp-comment-40-2
ἀρχέπλουτον
73
mvp-comment-40-3
καταστάτην
74
mvp-comment-41-1
εἴρηκα μέν νυν ταῦτα
75
mvp-comment-41-2
μελέσθω
76
mvp-comment-42-1
ἐπιστάτης
77
mvp-comment-43-1
ἰώ μοί μοι δύστηνος
78
mvp-comment-44-1
καὶ μὴν
79
mvp-comment-44-2
θυρῶν
80
mvp-comment-44-3
I should agree with the schol. in governing
θυρῶν
by
ἔνδον
81
mvp-comment-44-4
προσπόλων τινὸς
82
mvp-comment-45-1
θέλεις | μείνωμεν … ;
83
mvp-comment-45-2
The reading of the MSS.,
κἀνακούσωμεν
84
mvp-comment-45-3
On the other hand Sophocles has
ἐπακούω
, ‘to listen,’ in
O. T. 708
,
O. T. 794
:
O. C. 694
:
Ph. 1417.
Nauck's correction,
κἀπακούσωμεν
85
mvp-comment-46-1
μηδὲν πρόσθεν
86
mvp-comment-46-2
τὰ Λοξίου
87
mvp-comment-46-3
ἀρχηγετεῖν
88
mvp-comment-47-1
πατρὸς
89
mvp-comment-47-2
λουτρά
90
mvp-comment-47-3
φέρει … ἐφ’ ἡμῖν
91
mvp-comment-47-4
νίκην
92
κράτος τῶν δρωμένων
93
mvp-comment-47-5
All three actors now leave the scene. Orestes and Pylades go to Agamemnon's grave,—departing, probably, by the entrance on the spectators' right. The Paedagogus leaves by the entrance on the left,—to await the moment for seeking admission to the house (v. 660).—It might, indeed, be inferred from
πειρώμεθ’
(83) that the old man goes with the youths to their task; but the word need not imply more than his participation in the plan. while verses 73—75 seem clearly to indicate that he separates from his companions. When they have gone, Electra enters from the house.
mvp-comment-48-1
A
θρῆνος ἀπὸ σκηνῆς
, or lyric lament delivered by an actor alone. as dist. from the joint
κομμός
of actor and Chorus (121 n.).
mvp-comment-48-2
Verses 86—102 form a
σύστημα
,=vv. 103—120 (
ἀντισύστημα
). If the text is sound, the correspondence is not exact, since the dimeter in v. 99 answers to a monometer in v. 116. These anapaests are, however, of the type usually known as ‘free’ or ‘melic,’ as having more of a lyric character than the regular anapaests of the marching-songs (like those of the Parodos in the
Ajax): see W. Christ,
Metrik, 2nd ed., § 288. And in such anapaests the symmetry of ‘systems’ is often not strict (cp.
O. C. 117
n.).
mvp-comment-48-3
ὦ φάος ἁγνὸν
94
mvp-comment-48-4
γῆς ἰσόμοιρ’ ἀήρ
95
mvp-comment-48-5
ἰσόμοιῤ
96
ἰσόμοιρος
97
mvp-comment-49-1
πολλὰς μὲν … ᾔσθου
98
mvp-comment-49-2
ἀντήρεις
99
mvp-comment-50-1
πληγὰς
100
πλαγὰς
101
mvp-comment-51-1
ὑπολειφθῇ
102
ᾔσθου
103
mvp-comment-52-1
τὰ … παννυχίδων
104
ξυνίσας’
105
ὅσα … θρηνῶ
106
mvp-comment-52-2
ἤδη
107
mvp-comment-52-3
The MS.
οἴκων
108
λέκτρων
109
μογερῶν
110
mvp-comment-53-1
ὅσα τὸν δύστηνον
111
mvp-comment-54-1
κατὰ μὲν βάρβαρον αἶαν
112
ἐξένισεν
113
mvp-comment-55-1
Ἄρης
114
mvp-comment-55-2
ἐξένισεν
115
mvp-comment-56-1
κοινολεχὴς
116
mvp-comment-57-1
ὅπως δρῦν ὑλοτόμοι
117
mvp-comment-57-2
σχίζουσι
118
mvp-comment-57-3
κάρα
119
mvp-comment-57-4
πέλεκει
120
mvp-comment-58-1
ἄλλης
121
mvp-comment-58-2
φέρεται
122
mvp-comment-58-3
The deletion of the words
ἀπ’ ἄλλης
123
ἢ )μοῦ
124
mvp-comment-59-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ μὲν δὴ
125
mvp-comment-60-1
ἄστρων
126
mvp-comment-60-2
Others read,
ἔστ’ ἂν λεύσσω παμφεγγεῖς
|
ῥιπάς, λεύσσω δὲ τόδ’ ἦμαρ
, omitting
ἄστρων
. But
παμφεγγεῖς ῥιπάς
, without
ἄστρων
, would not suffice to denote starlight. If, again, the phrase is taken to denote the
sun's rays (as Monk proposes,
Mus. Crit. I. p. 67), then
λεύσσω δὲ τόδ’ ἦμαρ
becomes weak. Further, the preceding context, in which she has spoken of her laments
at night (92) and at morning, clearly suggests that the sense here is, ‘so long as I look on the
stars or on the
sun.’
mvp-comment-61-1
μὴ οὐ
127
mvp-comment-61-2
τεκνολέτειῤ
128
mvp-comment-62-1
ἐπὶ κωκυτῷ
129
mvp-comment-62-2
ἠχὼ
130
mvp-comment-63-1
Electra invokes, (1) the house of Hades and his bride Persephone, in which the spirit of Agamemnon now dwells; (2) Hermes, who, as
ψυχοπομπός
, conducted him thither,—and who will also guide the avengers on their way (1395 f.); (3)
Ἀρά
, the imprecation uttered by the victim upon his murderers,—the personified curse, here conceived as a supernatural power (
πότνια
), which calls the Erinyes into action; and (4) the Erinyes themselves.
mvp-comment-63-2
Ἀΐδου
131
mvp-comment-64-1
ὦ χθόνἰ Ἑρμῆ
132
mvp-comment-64-2
Ἀρά
133
mvp-comment-64-3
πότνια
134
mvp-comment-65-1
σεμναὶ
135
mvp-comment-65-2
θεῶν παῖδες
136
mvp-comment-66-1
ὁρᾶθ’
137
mvp-comment-67-1
αἳ τοὺς εὐνὰς ὑποκλεπτομένους
138
mvp-comment-67-2
These much-impugned words appear genuine. The murder has been prompted by the guilty love:
δόλος ἦν ὁ φράσας, ἔρος ὁ κτείνας
(197). In Electra's thought, they are inseparable. The allusion to the love
follows the reference to the murder, because she regards it as the crowning outrage (271
τὴν τελευταίαν ὕβριν
) that Clytaemnestra still lives with Aegisthus. Bloodshed was not the only sin which the Erinyes punished. They were the embodied sanctions of natural law, and every crime against the family came within their cognisance. (See
Introd. to Homer, p. 51, § 13.) Indeed, Electra herself speaks of the unhallowed union as a special provocation to those Avengers: 275 f.
ἡ δ’ ὧδε τλήμων ὥστε τῷ μιάστορι
|
ξύνεστ’, Ἐρινὺν οὔτιν’ ἐκφοβουμένη
.
mvp-comment-68-1
τείσασθε
139
mvp-comment-69-1
ἡμετέρου
140
μοι
141
mvp-comment-69-2
καί μοι
142
mvp-comment-70-1
ἄγειν
143
mvp-comment-70-2
σωκῶ
144
mvp-comment-71-1
δυστανοτάτας
145
mvp-comment-72-1
τάκεις … οἰμωγὰν
146
mvp-comment-72-2
ἀκόρεστον
147
mvp-comment-72-3
τὸν πάλαι
148
mvp-comment-72-4
πάλαι
149
ἐκ
150
mvp-comment-72-5
ἀθεώτατα
151
mvp-comment-72-6
κακᾷ … χειρὶ πρόδοτον
152
χειρὶ
153
mvp-comment-72-7
ὡς
154
mvp-comment-72-8
ὁ τάδε πορὼν
155
mvp-comment-72-9
εἴ μοι θέμις
156
mvp-comment-73-1
γενέθλα
157
mvp-comment-73-2
γενναίων
158
mvp-comment-73-3
παραμύθ‐
159
ιον
160
mvp-comment-74-1
ξυνίημι
161
mvp-comment-74-2
τάδ’
162
mvp-comment-75-1
φυγγάνει
163
mvp-comment-75-2
οὐδ’ ἐθέλω
164
mvp-comment-76-1
μὴ οὐ
165
mvp-comment-76-2
τὸν ἐμὸν … πατέρ’ ἄθλιον
166
mvp-comment-77-1
παντοίας
167
mvp-comment-77-2
Electra's lyrics contain some Doricisms (129, 146 f., etc.): but it is best to retain
φιλότητος
, with the MSS. The form in
η
was so familiar through Homer that it may have been preferred to
φιλότατος
even in lyrics.
Cp. 236
.
mvp-comment-78-1
ἀλύειν
168
mvp-comment-79-1
αἰαῖ, ἱκνοῦμαι
169
mvp-comment-80-1
τόν γ’ ἐξ Ἀΐδα … λίμνας
170
mvp-comment-80-2
παγκοίνου
171
mvp-comment-80-3
ἀνστάσεις
172
mvp-comment-81-1
οὔτε †γόοις οὔτε λιταῖσιν
173
οὔτε γόοισιν οὔτ’ εὐχαῖς
174
mvp-comment-82-1
For the repetition of
ἀλλά
175
mvp-comment-82-2
ἀπὸ τῶν μετρίων
176
mvp-comment-82-3
ἀμήχανον
177
mvp-comment-82-4
ο=ιόλλυσαι
178
mvp-comment-83-1
ἐν οἷς
179
mvp-comment-83-2
ἀνάλυσις … κακῶν
180
mvp-comment-83-3
τί μοι
181
mvp-comment-84-1
νήπιος
182
mvp-comment-84-2
γονέων
183
mvp-comment-85-1
ἐμέ γ’ … ἄραρεν
184
mvp-comment-85-2
φρένας
185
mvp-comment-86-1
αἰὲν Ἴτυν
186
mvp-comment-87-1
ὄρνις
187
mvp-comment-87-2
ἀτυζομένα
188
mvp-comment-87-3
Διὸς ἄγγελος
189
mvp-comment-88-1
Νιόβα, σὲ δ’
190
θεόν
191
mvp-comment-88-2
ἅτ’
192
mvp-comment-88-3
ἐν τάφῳ πετραίῳ
193
mvp-comment-89-1
αἰεὶ
194
mvp-comment-90-1
οὔτοι σοὶ μούνᾳ
195
mvp-comment-91-1
πρὸς ὅ τι
196
mvp-comment-91-2
τῶν ἔνδον εἶ περισσά
197
mvp-comment-92-1
οἷς
198
τῶν ἔνδον
199
mvp-comment-92-2
ὁμόθεν
200
γονᾷ ξύναιμος
201
mvp-comment-93-1
οἵα Χρ. ζώει
202
mvp-comment-93-2
Acc. to the version followed by Sophocles, Agamemnon had four daughters, Iphigeneia, Electra, Chrysothemis, Iphianassa. This was the account given in the cyclic
Κύπρια ἔπη
, as the schol. here mentions; a poem of which there is another trace in this play (566 ff.). Sophocles wrote an
Ἰφιγένεια
(
Nauck,
frag. Soph. 284—292
); but her name is not mentioned in the reference to her death below (530—594). In
Il. 9. 145
Agamemnon has three daughters, Chrysothemis, Laodicè, Iphianassa: Homer does not mention Iphigeneia. Lucretius gives the name of Iphianassa to the victim at Aulis (
1. 85
).
mvp-comment-93-3
ζώει
203
mvp-comment-93-4
καὶ Ἰφιάνασσα
204
mvp-comment-94-1
ἀχέων
205
mvp-comment-94-2
Hermann, taking
ἀχέων
206
κρυπτᾷ
207
mvp-comment-95-1
ὄλβιος, ὃν
208
mvp-comment-95-2
For the simple
ὅς
, instead of
ὅς γε
or
ὅστις
, with causal force, cp. below, 188, 261, 959;
O.T. 817.
mvp-comment-96-1
δέξεται εὐπατρίδαν
209
mvp-comment-96-2
Διὸς εὔφρονι
210
βήματι
211
mvp-comment-96-3
γᾶν
212
γᾶ
213
mvp-comment-96-4
Ὀρέσταν
214
ὃν
215
mvp-comment-97-1
ἀκάματα
216
mvp-comment-97-2
ἀνύμφευτος
217
ἄτεκνος
218
mvp-comment-97-3
οἰχνῶ
219
mvp-comment-98-1
δάκρυσι μυδαλέα
220
mvp-comment-98-2
τὸν ἀνήνυτον
221
mvp-comment-98-3
οἶτον ἔχουσα
222
mvp-comment-99-1
ὧν τ’ ἔπαθ’
223
ὧν τ’ ἐδάη
224
mvp-comment-99-2
Wecklein, reading
ἐδάην
, explains,— ‘what I have heard from him,’—viz., his promises of coming.
mvp-comment-99-3
τί γὰρ … ἀγγελίας
225
mvp-comment-99-4
ἀπατώμενον
226
τί … οὐκ
227
mvp-comment-99-5
Herwerden's
οὐχί μοι
228
οὐκ ἐμοί
229
ὁ δέ
230
mvp-comment-100-1
ποθεῖ, ποθῶν δ’
231
mvp-comment-101-1
ἔτι μέγας οὐρανῷ
232
ἐν
233
mvp-comment-102-1
τὸν ὑπεραλγῆ
234
mvp-comment-102-2
νέμουσα
235
mvp-comment-103-1
μήτε ὑπεράχθεο
236
οἷς
237
mvp-comment-104-1
εὐμαρὴς θεός
238
θεός
239
mvp-comment-105-1
οὔτε γὰρ
240
mvp-comment-105-2
Κρῖσαν
241
mvp-comment-105-3
Crisa stood about two miles W.S.W. of Delphi, on a spur of Parnassus, at the lower outlet of the gorge through which the river Pleistus issues into the plain. The
Iliad mentions ‘sacred Crisa’ (
ζαθέην
, 2. 520). But the Homeric Hymn to the Pythian Apollo is the best witness to its ancient power. There, just as here, the name
Κρῖσα
includes the land which stretches southward from the town to its harbour on the ‘wide gulf’ (vv. 253— 261). We need not, then, read
Κρίσᾳ
or
Κρίσας
. Crisa was the earliest seat of trade on the western sea; Delphi, when first founded, was merely a sanctuary in its territory. Pindar recalls the old prominence of its name when he describes a Pythian victory as won
Κρισαίαις ἐνὶ πτυχαῖς
(
P. 6. 18).
mvp-comment-105-4
Cirrha, a town of much later date, was the port of Crisa on the gulf. About 585 B.C., the Delphians, aided by Cleisthenes of Sicyon and his allies, succeeded, after a long struggle, in humbling Crisa and destroying Cirrha. The Crisaean plain was then devoted to Apollo, whose domain was thus extended from his temple to the coast. When Sophocles wrote, that ground was still a
βούνομος ἀκτή
, inviolable by plough or spade. It was not till the middle of the next century that the alleged encroachments of Amphissa on the
ἱερὰ χώρα
gave a pretext for war to the Amphictyons (355 B.C.).
mvp-comment-105-5
Ulrichs (
Reisen in Griechenland) was the first to place the relations of Crisa and Cirrha in a clear light. Strabo correctly describes the site of Cirrha, but erroneously places Crisa to the east of it (9. p. 418).
mvp-comment-106-1
βούνομον
242
βουνόμον
243
mvp-comment-106-2
βούνομον ἀκτὰν
244
Κρῖσαν
245
mvp-comment-107-1
ἀπερίτροπος
246
mvp-comment-108-1
παρὰ τὸν Ἀχέροντα
247
ἀνάσσων
248
θεὸς
249
mvp-comment-109-1
μὲν
250
mvp-comment-109-2
ὁ πολὺς … βίοτος
251
mvp-comment-109-3
ἀνέλπιστος
252
mvp-comment-109-4
187 *
τεκέων
. I am now satisfied that this is a true correction of
τοκέων
253
ἅτις
254
τοκέων
255
mvp-comment-110-1
ἁπερεί
256
mvp-comment-110-2
ἔποικος
257
mvp-comment-111-1
οἰκονομῶ θαλάμους
258
mvp-comment-112-1
ἀεικεῖ σὺν στολᾷ
259
mvp-comment-113-1
κεναῖς δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
260
ἀμφίσταμαι
261
mvp-comment-113-2
Hartung, reading
κενὰ δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
, takes the sense to be that she stands ‘hungry’ by the tables at which the others feast. But
κενή
as=
νῆστις
would be neither usual nor elegant.
mvp-comment-114-1
Hitherto the Chorus have offered consolation or counsel. At v. 213 they return to that strain. But here, moved by Electra's misery, they join with her in bewailing its cause.
mvp-comment-114-2
οἰκτρὰ μὲν … πλαγά
262
κοίταις
263
οἰκτρὰ … αὐδὰ
264
mvp-comment-114-3
Sophocles, who follows the Homeric story as to the banquet, could not but remember the
οἰκτροτάτην ὄπα
of the dying Cassandra. And this might naturally suggest to him that other
οἰκτρὰ αὐδή
which she had uttered at an earlier moment, immediately after Agamemnon's return,—her presage of his fate, and her own:
Aesch.
Ag. 1072
—1314.
mvp-comment-114-4
The sense then is:—‘There was a voice of lamentation at the return from Troy’; alluding especially to Cassandra's laments, but also, perhaps, to forebodings in the mouth of the people at Mycenae. ‘And there was a voice of lamentation
ἐν κοίταις πατρῴαις
, when thy father lay on the couch at the fatal banquet.’ The ‘voice’ at the banquet is, first, that of the dying Agamemnon; but Sophocles may have thought also of Cassandra's death-cry, which was sounding in the king's ears as he fell.—For other interpretations, see Appendix.
mvp-comment-114-5
νόστοις
265
ἐν
266
mvp-comment-114-6
κοίταις
267
mvp-comment-114-7
ὅτε οἱ
268
σοι
269
ἀνταία
270
mvp-comment-114-8
γενύων
271
mvp-comment-115-1
δόλος … ἔρος
272
mvp-comment-116-1
δεινὰν δεινῶς
273
δεινὰν … μορφάν
274
mvp-comment-116-2
εἴτ’ οὖν … εἴτε
275
βροτῶν
276
mvp-comment-117-1
πλέον … ἐχθίστα
277
mvp-comment-117-2
δὴ
278
mvp-comment-118-1
νὺξ
279
mvp-comment-118-2
δείπνων
280
mvp-comment-119-1
ἄχθη
281
τοῖς
282
θανάτους
283
mvp-comment-119-2
διδύμαιν χειροῖν
284
διδύμοιν
285
mvp-comment-120-1
εἷλον … πρόδοτον
286
mvp-comment-121-1
οἷς
287
mvp-comment-121-2
Ὀλύμπιος
288
mvp-comment-122-1
ποίνιμα
289
mvp-comment-123-1
ἀγλαΐας
290
mvp-comment-123-2
ἀποναίατο
291
mvp-comment-124-1
πόρσω
292
mvp-comment-125-1
γνώμαν ἴσχεις
293
mvp-comment-125-2
ἐξ οἵων
294
mvp-comment-125-3
τὰ παρόντ’
295
mvp-comment-125-4
οἰκείας
296
mvp-comment-126-1
πολύ … τι κακῶν
297
mvp-comment-126-2
ὑπερεκτήσω
298
mvp-comment-127-1
τὰ δὲ
299
οὐκ ἐριστὰ τοῖς δυνατοῖς
300
πλάθειν
301
mvp-comment-127-2
ἐριστά
302
mvp-comment-127-3
πλάθειν
303
mvp-comment-128-1
δεινοῖς ἠναγκάσθην
304
mvp-comment-129-1
ὀργά
305
ἔξοιδ’
306
mvp-comment-130-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
307
mvp-comment-130-2
ἐν … δεινοῖς
308
mvp-comment-130-3
σχήσω
309
mvp-comment-130-4
ταύτας ἄτας
310
mvp-comment-131-1
ὄφρα
311
mvp-comment-131-2
βίος ἔχῃ με
312
σχήσω
313
mvp-comment-132-1
τίνι γάρ … τίνι φρονοῦντι καίρια
314
ἀκούσαιμ’ ἂν πρόσφορον ἔπος
315
τίνι
316
πρόσφορον
317
mvp-comment-132-2
Other explanations are:—(1) Taking the dative with
πρόσφορον
:—‘To what person who feels aright would that word be suitable which I should hear (=which would be said of me)?’ That is: Should I not deserve to incur a censure from which every right-minded person would shrink? Should I not deserve to be called
δυσσεβής
? This seems forced; and it does not well suit
ἔπος
. (2) Taking the dative with
ἀκούσαιμι
:—‘At whose mouth (=
from whom), that thinks aright, could I hear a suitable word of comfort?’ But such a dative seems impossible. In
Il. 16. 515
δύνασαι δὲ σὺ πάντοσ’ ἀκούειν
|
ἀνέρι κηδομένῳ
, the dat. is one of interest, denoting the person whose prayer is heard (‘
for him’); cp.
Il. 5. 115
κλῦθί μοι
: 24. 335
ἔκλυες ᾧ κ’ ἐθέλῃσθα
.
mvp-comment-133-1
ἄνετε
318
mvp-comment-133-2
ἄλυτα
319
mvp-comment-133-3
κεκλήσεται
320
mvp-comment-133-4
231 f. For
ἐκ
321
mvp-comment-133-5
ἀνάριθμος
322
θρήνων
323
mvp-comment-134-1
ἀλλ’ οὖν
324
γε
325
εὐνοίᾳ
326
mvp-comment-135-1
μάτηρ ὡσεί τις
327
mvp-comment-136-1
μὴ τίκτειν
328
mvp-comment-136-2
ἄταν ἄταις
329
mvp-comment-137-1
καὶ τί μέτρον
330
κακότατος
331
mvp-comment-137-2
φέρε
332
mvp-comment-137-3
ἐπὶ τοῖς φθ.
333
mvp-comment-138-1
ἔβλαστ’
334
mvp-comment-139-1
τούτοις
335
mvp-comment-140-1
εἴ τῳ πρόσκειμαι χρηστῷ
336
mvp-comment-141-1
ξυνναίοιμ’
337
mvp-comment-141-2
εὔκηλος
338
mvp-comment-141-3
γονέων
339
ἐκτίμους
340
mvp-comment-141-4
ἐκτίμους ἵσχουσα
341
mvp-comment-141-5
πτέρυγας … γόων
342
mvp-comment-141-6
ὀξυτόνων
343
mvp-comment-142-1
εἰ γὰρ
344
mvp-comment-142-2
γᾶ
345
mvp-comment-142-3
οὐδὲν
346
ὢν
347
εἰ
348
mvp-comment-142-4
Electra is contrasting her father, whose earthly life has been cut short, with his murderers, who survive. But she believes that his spirit lives in the world below, and will be active in aiding the vengeance (453 ff.).
mvp-comment-142-5
πάλιν
349
mvp-comment-142-6
ἀντιφόνους δίκας
350
mvp-comment-143-1
ἔρροι τ’
351
mvp-comment-143-2
αἰδὼς
352
εὐσέβεια
353
mvp-comment-144-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
354
mvp-comment-144-2
καὶ
355
τὸ σὸν … καὶ τοὐμὸν
356
mvp-comment-145-1
νίκα
357
mvp-comment-145-2
ἅμα
358
mvp-comment-146-1
πολλοῖσι θρήνοις
359
mvp-comment-147-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
360
mvp-comment-148-1
ἥτις εὐγενὴς γυνή
361
mvp-comment-149-1
πατρῷα … πήματα
362
mvp-comment-150-1
κατ’ εὐφρόνην
363
mvp-comment-150-2
θάλλοντα
364
mvp-comment-151-1
ᾗ
365
mvp-comment-151-2
πρῶτα μὲν … εἶτα … ἔπειτα
366
ᾗ
367
mvp-comment-151-3
τὰ μητρὸς
368
mvp-comment-151-4
ἔχθιστα συμβέβηκεν
369
mvp-comment-152-1
κἀκ τῶνδ’ ἄρχομαι
370
mvp-comment-153-1
λαβεῖν … τὸ τητᾶσθαι
371
mvp-comment-154-1
ποίας
372
δοκεῖς
373
mvp-comment-155-1
ἴδω
374
εἰσίδω δ’
375
ἴδω δὲ
376
mvp-comment-155-2
μὲν
377
mvp-comment-156-1
ἐσθήματα
378
mvp-comment-156-2
ἐκείνῳ
379
mvp-comment-156-3
παρεστίους … λοιβάς
380
ἔνθ’ ἐκεῖνον ὤλεσεν
381
mvp-comment-156-4
Acc. to
Homer. Hymn. 29. 4 ff., feasts began and ended with libations to Hestia:
οὐ γὰρ ἄτερ σοῦ
|
εἰλαπίναι θνητοῖσιν, ἵν’ οὐ πρώτῃ πυμάτῃ τε
|
Ἱστίῃ ἀρχόμενος σπένδει μελιηδέα οἶνον
. Soph. fr. 658
<*> πρῷρα λοιβῆς Ἑστία
. Other divinities, including Zeus
σωτήρ
, were similarly honoured; then the paean was sung, and the
πότος
began ( Plat.
Symp.p. 176 A).
mvp-comment-157-1
τούτων
382
mvp-comment-158-1
αὐτοέντην
383
mvp-comment-158-2
Brunck first adopted
αὐτοέντην
384
αὐτοφόντην
385
mvp-comment-158-3
ἡμὶν
386
mvp-comment-159-1
ταλαίνῃ
387
mvp-comment-160-1
ταύτην … τῷδε
388
mvp-comment-161-1
μιάστορι
389
Ἐρινὺν
390
mvp-comment-162-1
ἐγγελῶσα τοῖς ποιουμένοις
391
mvp-comment-163-1
εὑροῦς’
392
τότε
393
mvp-comment-163-2
The conjecture
φρουροῦς’
394
τηροῦς’
395
mvp-comment-164-1
χοροὺς ἵστησι
396
mvp-comment-164-2
μηλοσφαγεῖ … ἱερὰ
397
mvp-comment-164-3
ἔμμην’ ἱερά
398
mvp-comment-164-4
τοῖς σωτηρίοις
399
mvp-comment-164-5
Argive tradition placed Agamemnon's death on the 13th of Gamelion (about the end of January). So said ‘the Argive historians’ (
οἱ Ἀργολικοὶ συγγραφεῖς
),— according to an Argive writer named Deinias, who lived about 225 B.C. (Schol. here: Müller,
Frag. Hist. vol. III. p. 25.) Possibly, then, the idea of Clytaemnestra's hideous festival may have been suggested to the poet by some actual commemoration of the event in Argolis. There was a cult of Agamemnon in various places,—notably in Laconia. (Cp. Roscher's
Lexicon, p. 96.)
mvp-comment-165-1
ἡ δύσμορος
400
κατὰ στέγας
401
mvp-comment-166-1
τέτηκα
402
mvp-comment-166-2
πατρὸς
403
mvp-comment-166-3
The
δαίς
is the feast which, in Homeric fashion (
Il. 1. 467
), would follow the sacrifice (281). Acc. to Eustathius p. 1507. 61 (on
Hom.
Od. 4. 524
ff.),
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαὶς
(or
τράπεζα
) was a proverb
ἐπὶ τῶν ἐπ’ ὀλέθρῳ εὐωχουμένων
. The poet may mean that Clytaemnestra called the festival
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαίς
, in direct allusion to
δεῖπνα ἄρρητα
(203): and this would give a special point to
ἐγγελῶσα
(277). Cp.
Eur.
Or. 1008
τά τ’ ἐπώνυμα δεῖπνα Θυέστου
. But the words do not necessarily imply more than that she called it
Ἀγαμεμνόνεια
.
mvp-comment-167-1
αὐτὴ πρὸς αὑτήν
404
αὑτήν
405
mvp-comment-167-2
κλαῦσαι
406
mvp-comment-167-3
ἡδονὴν φέρει
407
mvp-comment-168-1
ἡ λόγοισι γενναία
408
mvp-comment-169-1
φωνοῦσα
409
mvp-comment-170-1
δύσθεον
410
mvp-comment-170-2
μίσημα
411
mvp-comment-170-3
σοὶ μόνῃ
412
mvp-comment-170-4
τέθνηκεν
413
mvp-comment-170-5
ἐν πένθει
414
mvp-comment-171-1
ἐκ γόων
415
mvp-comment-171-2
οἱ κάτω θεοί
416
mvp-comment-172-1
τάδ’
417
mvp-comment-172-2
ἥξοντ’ Ὀρέστην
418
mvp-comment-173-1
παραστᾶς’
419
mvp-comment-174-1
ἥτις
420
mvp-comment-174-2
ὑπεξέθου
421
mvp-comment-175-1
ἀλλ’ ἴσθι τοι τείσουσά γ’
422
mvp-comment-176-1
ὑλακτεῖ
423
mvp-comment-176-2
σὺν
424
mvp-comment-176-3
πέλας
425
παρών
426
mvp-comment-176-4
301 The adv.
πάντα
427
mvp-comment-176-5
ἄναλκις
428
mvp-comment-176-6
ἡ πᾶσα βλάβη
429
mvp-comment-177-1
σὺν γυναιξὶ
430
mvp-comment-177-2
τὰς μάχας
431
mvp-comment-178-1
ἐφήξειν
432
mvp-comment-179-1
μέλλων … δρᾶν τι
433
mvp-comment-179-2
τὰς οὔσας τε … καὶ τὰς ἀπούσας
434
mvp-comment-179-3
μου
435
μοι
436
mvp-comment-179-4
διέφθορεν
437
mvp-comment-180-1
σωφρονεῖν
438
εὐσεβεῖν
439
mvp-comment-180-2
ἔν τοι κακοῖς
440
mvp-comment-180-3
πολλή )στ’ ἀνάγκη
441
κἀπιτηδεύειν κακά
442
mvp-comment-180-4
I place only a comma, not a colon, after
πάρεστιν
443
mvp-comment-181-1
ὄντος … βεβῶτος
444
mvp-comment-182-1
ἦ κάρτα
445
mvp-comment-182-2
θυραῖον
446
mvp-comment-182-3
οἰχνεῖν
447
mvp-comment-182-4
ἀγροῖσι
448
mvp-comment-182-5
τυγχάνει
449
mvp-comment-183-1
ἦ κἂν … ἱκοίμην
450
ἦ τ<*>ν
451
ἦ δἂν
452
mvp-comment-183-2
ἐς λόγους τοὺς σοὺς ἱκοίμην
453
mvp-comment-184-1
ὡς νῦν
454
ὥς νυν
455
mvp-comment-184-2
ἱστόρει· τί σοι φίλον
456
τό
457
τά
458
mvp-comment-184-3
With the other punctuation,
ἱστόρει τί σοι φίλον
459
mvp-comment-185-1
καὶ δὴ
460
mvp-comment-185-2
τοῦ κασιγνήτου τί φής
461
mvp-comment-185-3
ἥξοντος
462
ἢ μέλλοντος
463
mvp-comment-186-1
φησίν γε
464
mvp-comment-186-2
ποεῖ
465
mvp-comment-187-1
καὶ μὴν ἔγωγ’
466
γε
467
mvp-comment-187-2
οὐκ ὄκνῳ
468
mvp-comment-188-1
ἀρκεῖν
469
mvp-comment-189-1
ἐπεί
470
mvp-comment-189-2
μακρὰν
471
mvp-comment-189-3
324 Here, as in 316,
νῦν
472
νυν
473
mvp-comment-189-4
δόμων
474
φέρουσαν
475
mvp-comment-190-1
ὅμαιμον
476
mvp-comment-190-2
φύσιν
477
mvp-comment-191-1
Χρυσόθεμιν
478
mvp-comment-192-1
οἷα
479
νομίζεται
480
mvp-comment-193-1
πρὸς θυρῶνος ἐξόδοις
481
φωνεῖς
482
ἐλθοῦσα
483
αὖ
484
mvp-comment-193-2
330 For the absence of caesura, cp.
Ph. 101
n.
mvp-comment-194-1
θυμῷ … χαρίζεσθαι
485
mvp-comment-195-1
καίτοι τοσοῦτόν γ’ οἶδα
486
mvp-comment-195-2
κἀμαυτήν, ὅτι
487
mvp-comment-195-3
333 f. For the repeated
ἄν
488
mvp-comment-195-4
οἶ) αὐτοῖς φρονῶ
489
mvp-comment-196-1
ὑφειμένῃ
490
πλεῖν
491
mvp-comment-196-2
For the image, cp.
Eur.
Med. 524
ἄκροισι λαίφους κρασπέδοις
(with close-reefed sails)
ὑπεκφυγεῖν
|
τὴν σὴν στόμαργον, ὦ γύναι, γλωσσαλγίαν
:
Ar.
Ran. 997
ἀλλ’ ὅπως, ὦ γεννάδα
, |
μὴ πρὸς ὀργὴν ἀντιλέξεις
, |
ἀλλὰ συστείλας, ἄκροισι
|
χρώμενος τοῖς ἱστίοις κ.τ.λ.
: and conversely
Soph.
Ant. 715
ναὸς ὅστις ἐγκρατῆ πόδα
|
τείνας ὑπείκει μηδέν
.
Ovid
Epist. 1. 8. 71
moderatius opta, | Et voti, quaeso, contrahe vela tui.
Shakesp.
Henry VI., pt. iii, act 3 sc. 3. 5
‘Now Margaret | Must strike her sail, and learn awhile to serve | Where kings command.’
mvp-comment-197-1
καὶ μὴ δοκεῖν
492
mvp-comment-198-1
τοιαῦτα δ’ ἄλλα
493
ἀλλὰ
494
ἄλλα
495
mvp-comment-199-1
καίτοι τὸ μὲν δίκαιον
496
mvp-comment-199-2
κρίνεις
497
mvp-comment-199-3
εἰ … με δεῖ
498
mvp-comment-199-4
ἐλευθέραν
499
mvp-comment-199-5
ζῆν
500
mvp-comment-199-6
πάντ’
501
mvp-comment-199-7
ἀκουστέα
502
mvp-comment-200-1
δεινόν γε
503
mvp-comment-201-1
τῆς … τικτούσης
504
mvp-comment-201-2
μέλειν
505
mvp-comment-202-1
τἀμὰ νουθετήματα
506
mvp-comment-202-2
κείνης διδακτά
507
mvp-comment-202-3
ἐκ σαυτῆς
508
mvp-comment-203-1
The text, which has been suspected (cr. n.), is sound; but the train of thought is somewhat obscured by compression.
mvp-comment-203-2
‘You forget your father, and care only for your mother. All your counsels to me come from her. Then (
ἔπειτα
),—that being so,—give up the attempt at a compromise. Make a
choice (
ἑλοῦ γε
). You can be imprudent (
φρονεῖν κακῶς
),—as you say that I am,—and loyal to your dead father. Or you can be prudent (
φρονοῦσα
), and forgetful of him,—as you actually are; you who (
ἥτις
) say, indeed, that you would show your hatred of the murderers if you could; and yet, when I
do resist them, you try to turn me from my purpose. You merely add the shame of cowardice to our woes.’
mvp-comment-203-3
ἔπειθ’
509
mvp-comment-203-4
ἑλοῦ γε
510
mvp-comment-203-5
φρονεῖν κακῶς
511
mvp-comment-203-6
Other explanations are:—(1) ‘Choose to be thought either
lost to right feeling, or, if you have such feeling, then at least
forgetful of your duty.’ (2) ‘Choose to seem either
unintelligent (if you are merely the blind instrument of our rulers); or, if you act with clear understanding (
φρονοῦσα
),—thinking to benefit me,—at least forgetful of your father.’ Both these views assume that the question is merely between two interpretations which might be placed on the present conduct of Chrysothemis. But Electra is putting the dilemma between imprudent loyalty and prudent disloyalty.
mvp-comment-204-1
τῶν φίλων
512
mvp-comment-205-1
ἥτις
513
φρονοῦσα
514
μῖσος
515
mvp-comment-206-1
πάντα
516
mvp-comment-206-2
τιμωρουμένης
517
mvp-comment-207-1
οὔτε … τε
518
mvp-comment-207-2
τήν τε δρῶσαν
519
mvp-comment-208-1
πρὸς κακοῖσι
520
mvp-comment-208-2
δειλίαν ἔχει
521
mvp-comment-209-1
ἐπεὶ
522
mvp-comment-209-2
ἢ μάθ’ ἐξ ἐμοῦ
523
mvp-comment-210-1
ἐπαρκούντως
524
mvp-comment-211-1
προσάπτειν
525
mvp-comment-211-2
εἴ τις ἔστ’ ἐκεῖ χάρις
526
mvp-comment-212-1
ἡμὶν
527
ξύνει
528
mvp-comment-213-1
τὰ σὰ … δῶῤ
529
mvp-comment-213-2
ἐφ’ οἶσι
530
mvp-comment-213-3
χλιδᾷς
531
mvp-comment-214-1
ὑπεικάθοιμι
532
mvp-comment-214-2
πλουσία
533
mvp-comment-214-3
περιρρείτω
534
mvp-comment-215-1
τοὐμὲ μὴ λυπεῖν
535
mvp-comment-215-2
Remark the resemblance to the passage where Antigone—summing up her position—compares the
moral pain of neglecting her duty with those penalties which she contemns:—
κείνοις ἂν ἤλγουν· τοῖσδε δ’ οὐκ ἀλγύνομαι
(
Ant. 468
). There, too, we have a Sophoclean triad of clauses, the third echoing the first,—as
τῆς σῆς δ’ οὐκ ἐρῶ τιμῆς τυχεῖν
here reiterates the sense of
σοὶ δὲ πλουσία... βίος
(n. on
Ant. 465
ff.).
mvp-comment-215-3
One of the scholia recognises the traditional reading, and explains it correctly: —
τοῦτο μόνον ἐμὲ βοσκέτω, τὸ μὴ λυπεῖν ἐμὲ αὐτήν, εἰ
(‘as I should do, if’)
τοῖς φονεῦσι τοῦ πατρὸς πείθεσθαι ἀναγκασθήσομαι
.—The conjectures have been numerous: see Appendix.
mvp-comment-216-1
οὐδ’ ἂν σὺ
536
mvp-comment-217-1
παῖδα
537
mvp-comment-217-2
κεκλῆσθαι
538
mvp-comment-218-1
πλείστοις
539
mvp-comment-219-1
μηδὲν
540
πρὸς ὀργὴν
541
mvp-comment-220-1
ἀμφοῖν
542
τοῖς λόγοις
543
mvp-comment-221-1
τῆσδε … αὕτη
544
πάλιν
545
mvp-comment-222-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
546
mvp-comment-222-2
πως
547
mvp-comment-222-3
μύθων
548
mvp-comment-223-1
οὐδ’
549
κοὐδ’
550
ποτέ
551
mvp-comment-224-1
ἰὸν
552
mvp-comment-224-2
σχήσει
553
mvp-comment-225-1
τὸ δεινὸν
554
mvp-comment-225-2
εἰ γὰρ τῶνδέ μοι
555
εἰ
556
mvp-comment-226-1
γὰρ
557
mvp-comment-226-2
γόων
558
λόγων
559
mvp-comment-227-1
ἐνταῦθα
560
mvp-comment-227-2
ἔνθα μή ποτε … προσόψει
561
mvp-comment-227-3
ζῶσα
562
mvp-comment-227-4
κατηρεφεῖ
563
mvp-comment-227-5
χθονὸς τῆσδ’ ἐκτὸς
564
mvp-comment-227-6
ὑμνήσεις
565
mvp-comment-228-1
πρὸς ταῦτα
566
mvp-comment-228-2
Nauck reads
κοὔ
567
καί
568
mvp-comment-228-3
ἐν καλῷ, εὔκαιρον
schol.:
H. 4. 3. 5
νομίσαντες οὐκ ἐν καλῷ εἶναι πρὸς τοὺς ὁπλίτας ἱππομαχεῖν
: so, too,
Eur.
Heracl. 971
, etc. Cp.
καλόν
(
ἐστι
)=
καίριον
in
Soph.
Ph. 1155
; and
εἰς καλόν
=
καιρίως
in
O.T. 78.
mvp-comment-229-1
ἦ ταῦτα δὴ
569
ἦ … δὴ
570
ἦ … γὰρ
571
mvp-comment-229-2
καὶ βεβούλευνται
572
mvp-comment-230-1
ἀλλ’ ἐξίκοιτο
573
mvp-comment-230-2
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκ’
574
mvp-comment-231-1
τίνα … τόνδ’
575
mvp-comment-231-2
τάλαινα
576
mvp-comment-232-1
εἴ τι τῶνδε
577
mvp-comment-233-1
ποῦ ποτ’ εἶ φρενῶν
578
mvp-comment-234-1
ὅπως
579
ὑμῶν
580
mvp-comment-234-2
προσώτατ’
581
προσωτάτω φύγω
582
mvp-comment-235-1
βίου … τοῦ παρόντος
583
mvp-comment-236-1
καλὸς γὰρ
584
mvp-comment-236-2
θαυμάσαι
585
mvp-comment-237-1
τοῖς φίλοις
586
mvp-comment-238-1
εἰκαθεῖν
587
mvp-comment-239-1
ταῦτα
588
οὐκ ἐμοὺς
589
mvp-comment-240-1
γε
590
μέντοι
591
mvp-comment-240-2
μὴ )ξ
592
mvp-comment-240-3
πεσεῖν
593
mvp-comment-240-4
399 A woman, speaking of herself in the plur., uses the masc.:
Ant. 926
παθόντες ἂν ξυγγνοῖμεν ἡμαρτηκότες
.
mvp-comment-241-1
συγγνώμην
594
mvp-comment-242-1
τἄπη
595
mvp-comment-242-2
πρὸς κακῶν
596
mvp-comment-243-1
μή πω
597
mvp-comment-244-1
οἷπερ … ὁδοῦ
598
mvp-comment-245-1
τῷ φέρεις
599
mvp-comment-245-2
ἔμπυρα
600
mvp-comment-246-1
τυμβεῦσαι χοάς
601
mvp-comment-247-1
βροτῶν
602
mvp-comment-248-1
ὃν ἔκταν’ αὐτή
603
ὅν γ’
604
mvp-comment-249-1
τῷ τοῦτ’ ἤρεσεν
605
mvp-comment-250-1
δείματος
606
mvp-comment-250-2
δοκεῖν ἐμοί
607
mvp-comment-251-1
θεοὶ πατρῷοι
608
mvp-comment-251-2
συγγένεσθέ γ’
609
mvp-comment-251-3
ἀλλὰ νῦν
610
mvp-comment-252-1
εἴποιμ’ ἂν τότε
611
mvp-comment-253-1
ἐπὶ σμικρὸν
612
ἐπὶ σμικρῶν
613
mvp-comment-253-2
φράσαι
614
mvp-comment-254-1
σμικροὶ λόγοι
615
mvp-comment-255-1
πατρὸς … δευτέραν ὁμιλίαν
616
mvp-comment-255-2
ἐφέστιον πῆξαι
617
mvp-comment-255-3
This sceptre is described in the
Iliad (2. 101 f.) as the work of Hephaestus, who gave it Zeus; Hermes transmitted it to Pelops, from whom it passed to Atreus and Agamemnon. The Homeric sceptre is often called
χρύσεον
(
Il. 2. 268
, etc.), prob. as being ornamented with gold foil, or studded with gold nails (
Il. 1. 246
χρυσείοις ἥλοισι πεπαρμένον
). Among the objects found at Mycenae are some supposed remains of such sceptres (Schliem.,
Myc. 201, etc.).
mvp-comment-255-4
οὑφόρει ποτέ
618
mvp-comment-256-1
ἔκ τε
619
ἐκ δὲ
620
mvp-comment-256-2
βρύοντα
621
mvp-comment-256-3
ᾧ … γενέσθαι
622
mvp-comment-256-4
The vision resembles that of Astyages, who dreamed that a vine sprang from his daughter Mandanè, the wife of Cambyses,
τὴν δὲ ἄμπελον ἐπισχεῖν τὴν Ἀσίην πᾶσαν
. The
ὀνειροπόλοι
explained this to mean that her son (Cyrus) should reign in his grandfather's stead. (
Her. 1. 108.
) The spreading branches figure also in the dream of Xerxes (7. 19):
ἐδόκεε...ἐστεφανῶσθαι ἐλαίης θαλλῷ, ἀπὸ δὲ τῆς ἐλαίης τοὺς κλάδους γῆν πᾶσαν ἐπισχεῖν
.
mvp-comment-256-5
In choosing the
sceptre of Agamemnon as the stock from which the wondrous growth is put forth, Sophocles may have had in mind the words of Achilles (
Il. 1. 234
ff.);
ναὶ μὰ τόδε σκῆπτρον· τὸ μὲν οὔποτε φύλλα καὶ ὄζους
|
φύσει, ἐπεὶ δὴ πρῶτα τομὴν ἐν ὄρεσσι λέλοιπεν
, |
οὐδ’ ἀναθηλήσει
.
mvp-comment-257-1
του παρόντος
623
τοῦ
624
παρόντος
625
του
626
mvp-comment-257-2
Ἡλίῳ δείκνυσι τοὖναρ
627
mvp-comment-258-1
οὐ κάτοιδα, πλὴν
628
mvp-comment-258-2
πέμπει με κείνη
629
mvp-comment-259-1
These three verses, which the MSS. give to Electra, and which several recent critics reject (cr. n.), clearly belong to Chrysothemis, and are genuine. Electra's exclamation of joy (411) caused Chrysothemis to ask if her sister had any ground for hope (412). Electra replied that, when she had heard the dream, she would say. This showed her sister that Electra relied merely on the fact that Clytaemnestra had seen
some fearful vision. Now, therefore, instead of asking for Electra's interpretation, she merely repeats her counsel (383 f.) before proceeding on her errand. The words
πρός
νυν θεῶν κ.τ.λ.
(428 ff.) show the train of her thought. To Chrysothemis, the alarm of Clytaemnestra (427) is more important than the apparition of Agamemnon. The dream is only a new reason why Electra should be cautious,—not why she should hope.
mvp-comment-259-2
The current ascription of the verses to Electra was doubtless prompted by verse 413. It was supposed that the recital of Chrysothemis must be immediately followed by the comments of Electra. But, as Hermann observed, the phrase
ἀβουλίᾳ πεσεῖν
would alone suffice to show that the verses belong to Chrysothemis (
cp. 398
). Nor could the warning,
σὺν κακῷ μέτει πάλιν
, be fitly uttered by Electra.
mvp-comment-259-3
τῶν ἐγγενῶν
630
mvp-comment-260-1
ἀβουλίᾳ
631
mvp-comment-260-2
σὺν κακῷ
632
mvp-comment-260-3
μέτει
633
mvp-comment-261-1
ἀλλ’
634
mvp-comment-261-2
ὦ φίλη
635
τούτων μὲν
636
mvp-comment-262-1
οὐ … θέμις
637
οὐδ’ ὅσιον
638
mvp-comment-262-2
ἐχθρᾶς ἀπὸ γυναικὸς
639
mvp-comment-262-3
κτερίσματ’
640
mvp-comment-262-4
λουτρὰ
641
mvp-comment-263-1
ἀλλ’ ἢ πνοαῖσιν
642
ῥοαῖσιν
643
mvp-comment-263-2
κρύψον
644
mvp-comment-263-3
νιν
645
mvp-comment-263-4
ἔνθα μή ποτ’
646
ἔνθεν
647
mvp-comment-263-5
εὐνὴν
648
mvp-comment-264-1
ἀλλ’ ὅταν θάῃν
649
mvp-comment-264-2
The conjecture
ἔστ’ ἂν
650
ὅταν
651
σῳζέσθω
652
mvp-comment-264-3
κειμήλἰ
653
mvp-comment-265-1
ἀρχὴν
654
τλημονεστάτη
655
mvp-comment-266-1
ἔβλαστε
656
mvp-comment-267-1
ὅν γ’ … τῷδ’
657
mvp-comment-267-2
ἐπέστεφε
658
mvp-comment-267-3
442 f. The position of
αὐτῇ
659
mvp-comment-267-4
δέξεσθαι
660
mvp-comment-267-5
It seems, then, a reasonable inference that here, where the reference is to future time, he would have written
δέξεσθαι
661
δέξασθαι
662
mvp-comment-267-6
444 ff. Join
θανὼν ἄτιμος
663
mvp-comment-267-7
ἐμασχαλίσθη
664
mvp-comment-267-8
Two different motives are assigned by the Greek commentators; viz.:—(1) the desire to render the dead incapable of wreaking vengeance (
ὥσπερ τὴν δύναμιν ἐκείνων ἀφαιρούμενοι
): (2) the desire to make an atonement (
ἐξιλάσασθαι τὴν δολοφονίαν—ἀφοσιοῦσθαι τὸν φόνον
). There can be little doubt that the first of these motives was the primitive origin of the custom. If the second was afterwards blended with it, the idea may have been that of offering the severed portions to the gods below,—as a victim was devoted to death by cutting off a lock of hair (
Eur.
Alc. 75
). Apollonius Rhodius seems to present the practice in this light (4. 477): Jason, having slain a foe,
ἐξάργματα τάμνε θανόντος
. Cp.
Etym. Magn.:
ἀπάργματα λέγεται τὰ ὑπὸ τῶν τραγῳδῶν λεγόμενα μασχαλίσματα
.
mvp-comment-267-9
κἀπὶ λουτροῖσιν
665
mvp-comment-267-10
ἐξέμαξ ν
666
mvp-comment-267-11
ἆρα μὴ
667
mvp-comment-268-1
οὐκ ἔστιν
668
mvp-comment-268-2
ταῦτα μὲν μέθες· σὺ δὲ
669
mvp-comment-269-1
βοστρύχων ἄκρας φόβας
670
mvp-comment-269-2
κἀμοῦ ταλαίνης
671
mvp-comment-270-1
†ἀλιπαρῆ
672
λιπαρῆ
673
mvp-comment-270-2
We come, therefore, to a dilemma. (1) The words
τήνδ’ ἀλιπαρῆ τρίχα
may conceal some corruption:
τήνδ’
ought possibly to be
τήνδε τ’
674
ἀλίπαρον
675
mvp-comment-270-3
(2) Or else, if the text be sound,
ἀλιπαρῆ
may mean
οὐ λιπαράν
. There is no doubt that
λιπ
, ‘fat,’ is the root both of
λι^παρός
, ‘shining,’ and of
λι—παρής
, ‘sticking’; cp.
Plat.
Crat. 427 B
τὸ λιπαρὸν καὶ τὸ κολλῶδες
(
Curt.
Etym. § 340
). Similarly
γλίσχρος
, ‘sticky,’ came to mean ‘importunate.’ It is barely possible that, in coining a new negative compound, the poet may have transferred the sense of
λιπαρός
to
λιπαρής
: but it seems improbable.
mvp-comment-271-1
ζῶμα
676
mvp-comment-271-2
χλιδαῖς
677
mvp-comment-272-1
προσπίτνουσα
678
αὐτὸν
679
mvp-comment-273-1
ἐξ ὑπερτέρας χερός
680
mvp-comment-273-2
ζῶντ’
681
mvp-comment-274-1
ἀφνεωτέραις
682
mvp-comment-274-2
στέφωμεν
683
mvp-comment-274-3
δωρούμεθα
684
mvp-comment-275-1
οἶμαι μὲν οὖν
685
mvp-comment-275-2
If
μέλον
686
μέλειν
687
μέλον
688
mvp-comment-276-1
σοί
689
mvp-comment-277-1
βροτῶν
690
mvp-comment-278-1
πρὸς εὐσέβειαν
691
mvp-comment-279-1
δράσω
692
mvp-comment-279-2
τὸ γὰρ δίκαιον
693
mvp-comment-279-3
(1)
τὸ δίκαιον
is an acc. of general reference, and
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
is impersonal. ‘With regard to what is (clearly) right, it is unreasonable for two persons to dispute; rather both should hasten on the doing (of it).’ With
ἀλλ’ ἐπισπεύδειν
we supply the notion
δεῖ
from the negative
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
(as from
οὐκ ἔξεστι
in
O. C. 1402
ff.; cp.
O. T. 817
ff.). For the form of the sentence, cp.
H. 7. 3. 7
τοὺς περὶ Ἀρχίαν...οὐ ψῆφον ἀνεμείνατε, ἀλλὰ ὁπότε πρῶτον ἐδυνάσθητε ἐτιμωρήσασθε
. So here the acc.
τὸ δίκαιον
, which represents the object of
δρᾶν
, is separated from it by the parenthesis
οὐκ
ἔχει λόγον δυοῖν ἐρίζειν
. (The first scholium gives substantially this view:
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον φιλονεικεῖν περὶ τοῦ δικαίου, ὥστε περὶ αὐτοῦ δύο ὄντας ἐρίζειν
.)
mvp-comment-279-4
(2) Or
τὸ δίκαιον
might be nom.: ‘that which is clearly right does not
afford any ground (
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
) for two persons to dispute,’ etc. So the second schol.:
ἢ τὸ οὐκ ἔχει λόγον ἀντὶ τοῦ οὐ παρέχει πρόφασιν
. So far as the verb
ἔχει
is concerned, this sense is quite admissible: cp.
Thuc. 2. 41
οὔτε τῷ πολεμίῳ ἐπελθόντι ἀγανάκτησιν ἔχει
(
ἡ πόλις
). The objection is that the phrases
ἔχειν λόγον, οὐκ ἔχειν λόγον
, which are very common, regularly mean, ‘to be reasonable,’ ‘to be unreasonable.’ This is so both in the personal and in the impersonal constr.; as Plat.
Phaedop. 62 D
τὸ γὰρ μὴ ἀγανακτεῖν...οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
:
Dem. or. 36 § 54
πῶς ἔχει λόγον σὲ...δίκην ἀξιοῦν λαμβάνειν
; The supposed sense, ‘not to
afford a reason,’ is unexampled.
mvp-comment-279-5
δυοῖν
694
mvp-comment-280-1
παρ’ ὑμῶν
695
mvp-comment-281-1
πικρὰν
696
δοκῶ με … τολμήσειν
697
ἔτι
698
mvp-comment-282-1
εἰ μὴ )γὼ
699
mvp-comment-282-2
γνώμας λειπομένα
700
mvp-comment-283-1
ἁ πρόμαντις Δίκα
701
mvp-comment-283-2
δίκαια φερομένα χεροῖν κράτη
702
mvp-comment-284-1
μέτεισιν
703
mvp-comment-284-2
οὐ μακροῦ χρόνου
704
mvp-comment-285-1
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
705
κλύουσαν
706
mvp-comment-285-2
ἁδυπνόων … ὀνειράτων
707
mvp-comment-286-1
ἀμναστεῖ γ’ ὁ φύσας ς’
708
mvp-comment-287-1
χαλκόπλακτος
709
mvp-comment-287-2
γένυς
710
mvp-comment-287-3
The very axe (
φόνιος πέλεκυς
, 99) with which the blow was dealt is imagined as nourishing a grudge against the murderers who had set it such a task. Such a personification recalls that practice of Athenian law by which inanimate objects which had caused death were brought to a formal trial in the court called
τὸ ἐπὶ Πρυτανείῳ
, and, after sentence, cast beyond the boundaries, in the presence of the Archon Basileus and the sacrificial officers of the tribes (
φυλο‐
βασιλεῖς
). Aeschin. or. 3 § 244
τὰ μὲν ξύλα καὶ τοὺς λίθους καὶ τὸν σίδηρον, τὰ ἄφωνα καὶ ἀγνώμονα, ἐάν τῳ ἐμπεσόντα ἀποκτείνῃ, ὑπερορίζομεν
. (Cp.
Dem. or. 23 § 76
.) A like conception was implied in the English law (repealed in 1846) of ‘deodands’ (Deo danda),
i.e., personal chattels (whether animals or things) which, having caused the death of a human being, were forfeited to the Crown for pious uses.
mvp-comment-288-1
ἐν αἰκίαις
711
mvp-comment-289-1
καὶ πολύπους καὶ πολύχειρ
712
mvp-comment-290-1
λόχοις
713
mvp-comment-290-2
χαλκόπους
714
mvp-comment-291-1
ἄλεκτρ’ ἄνυμφα
715
mvp-comment-291-2
γάμων ἁμιλλήμαθ’
716
mvp-comment-291-3
ἐπέβα
717
mvp-comment-292-1
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι … συνδρῶσιν
718
mvp-comment-292-2
Verses 495—497 (
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι...τέρας
) answer metrically to vv. 479—481
ὕπεστί μοι...ὀνειράτων
, where the text is certain, save for the doubt whether
θράσος
or
θάρσος
should stand in 479. Here we must first decide two points.
mvp-comment-292-3
(1) Are the words
πρὸ τῶνδε
719
mvp-comment-292-4
(2) Could
ἔχει με, μήποτε τέρας πελᾶν
(etc.) mean, ‘
the belief possesses me, that’ etc.? Surely not. No real parallel for so strange a phrase has been produced. It is irrelevant to quote those impersonal verbs which directly express the
occurrence of a thought to the mind; as
Xen.
An. 6. 1. 17
εἰσῄει αὐτοὺς ὅπως ἂν καὶ ἔχοντές τι οἴκαδε ἀφίκοιντο
(‘the thought came to them, how they might,’ etc.):
Thuc. 6. 78.
§ 1
εἰ δέ τῳ ἄρα παρέστηκε, τὸν μὲν Συρακόσιον...πολέμιον εἶναι κ.τ.λ.
Either, then, the subject to
ἔχει
has dropped out, or the words
μ’ ἔχει
conceal a corruption.
mvp-comment-292-5
The following remedies are possible: I incline to the first, as involving least change. (1) Reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
, we may read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοί μ’ ἔχει
|
<θάρσος τι>, μήποθ’ ἡμῖν
etc. (It may be remarked that
τι
is in harmony with the tone of
ὕπεστί μοι
in 479.) Another available word is
ξύννοια
(cp.
Ant. 279
). (2) Or, reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θάρσος
, we could read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι θάρσος ἴσχει με
. On either view, the
υ
of
ἁδυπνόων
in 480 is long (as several critics have assumed). It should be noted that (1) involves a different constitution of the verses: see p. lxxxii.
mvp-comment-292-6
In those MSS. which have
μή ποτε μή ποθ’ ἡμῖν
720
mvp-comment-293-1
ἀψεγές
721
ἀψεφές
722
mvp-comment-293-2
πελᾶν
723
mvp-comment-294-1
τοῖς δρῶσι
724
τοῖς συνδρῶσιν
725
mvp-comment-295-1
μαντεῖαι βροτῶν
726
mvp-comment-296-1
εὖ κατασχήσει
727
mvp-comment-297-1
ἱππεία
728
mvp-comment-297-2
Oenomaüs, king of Pisa in Elis, had promised the hand of his daughter Hippodameia to the suitor who should defeat him in a chariot-race; the penalty of failure being death. The young Pelops, son of Tantalus, offered himself as a competitor. Myrtilus, the charioteer of Oenomaüs, was persuaded (either by Hippodameia or by Pelops) to betray his master. He did so by leaving out one or both of the linch-pins by which the naves of the chariot-wheels were secured to the axles.
Tzetzes on Lycophron 156
ταῖς χοινίκισι
(=
πλήμναις
, the naves)
τῶν τροχῶν οὐκ ἐμβαλὼν τοὺς ἥλους
. According to another story, he substituted a linch-pin of wax for a real one (
schol. Apoll. Rh. 752
ἐμβαλόντα κήρινον ἔμβολον ἐπὶ τοῦ ἀκραξονίου
). So Pelops won the race, and the bride. But Oenomaüs was soon avenged on the traitor; for Myrtilus insulted Hippodameia, and was thrown into the sea by Pelops; upon whose house he invoked a curse, as he sank.
mvp-comment-297-3
Euripides, too, (
Or. 990
ff.,
Helen. 386 f.) refers to this chariot-race as the event with which the troubles of the Pelopidae began. Apollonius Rhodius briefly describes the critical moment of the race as one of the subjects embroidered on the cloak of Jason (1. 752 ff.); there Oenomaüs was seen, ‘falling sideways, as the axle broke at the naves of the wheels,’—
ἄξονος ἐν πλήμνῃσι παρακλιδὸν ἀγνυμένοιο
|
πίπτεν
.
mvp-comment-297-4
The eastern pediment of the temple of Zeus at Olympia (
circ. 450 B.C.) was adorned with sculptures by Paeonius, representing the preparation for this contest (
Paus. 5. 10. 6
). The fragments found on the site have sufficed for a reconstruction of the group. Zeus occupied the centre; to the right of him were Pelops and Hippodameia; to the left, Oenomaüs and his wife Steropè. On each side was a chariot drawn by four horses. Myrtilus was sitting in front of his team, with his face turned away from his master.
mvp-comment-297-5
In the older and nobler form of the myth, Pelops won, not by a fraud, but by the grace of Poseidon, who gave him winged horses (Pindar
O. 1. 87
ἔδωκεν δίφρον τε χούσεον πτεροῖσίν τ’ ἀκάμαντας ἵππους
). On the chest (
λάρναξ
) of Cypselus, seen by Pausanias in the Heraeum at Olympia (
Paus. 5. 17. 5
), Pelops was driving two winged horses.
mvp-comment-298-1
αἰανὴς
729
mvp-comment-298-2
The form
αἰανὴς
has the best authority, and some critics hold that
αἰανὸς
(Hesych.) was a Byzantine invention. But in
Aesch.
Eum. 416
,
ἡμεῖς γάρ ἐσμεν νυκτὸς αἰανῆς τέκνα
(so L, schol., and Tzetzes on Lycophron 406),
αἰανῆ
is far less suitable.
mvp-comment-299-1
εὖτε
730
mvp-comment-299-2
ὁ ποντισθεὶς Μυρτίλος
731
mvp-comment-299-3
A vase found at Capua shows Pelops and Hippodameia in a ship, from which Myrtilus is falling backwards into the water. A winged Erinys hovers in the air above, brandishing a sword over the head of Pelops (Baumeister,
Denkmäler p. 1204, referring to
Mon. Inst. x. 25).
mvp-comment-299-4
ἐκοιμάθη
732
mvp-comment-300-1
παγχρυσέων δίφρων
733
mvp-comment-301-1
πρόρριζος
734
mvp-comment-301-2
ἐκριφθείς
735
mvp-comment-302-1
ἔλειπεν
736
ἔλιπεν
737
οἴκου
738
οἴκους
739
πω
740
mvp-comment-303-1
πολύπονος
741
αἰκία
742
mvp-comment-304-1
ἀνειμένη
743
μέν
744
mvp-comment-304-2
ὡς ἔοικας
745
mvp-comment-304-3
στρέφει
746
mvp-comment-304-4
Clytaemnestra begins in the same strain as Chrysothemis, who likewise emphasised her reproof by the word
αὖ
747
mvp-comment-305-1
μή τοι θυραίαν γ’
748
mvp-comment-305-2
αἰσχύνειν φίλους
749
mvp-comment-306-1
καίτοι
750
mvp-comment-306-2
δὴ
751
πολλούς
752
mvp-comment-306-3
ἐξεῖπάς με … ὡς
753
mvp-comment-306-4
θρασεῖα
754
τραχεῖα
755
mvp-comment-306-5
ἄρχω
756
mvp-comment-307-1
ὕβριν … οὐκ ἔχω
757
κακῶς κλύουσα
758
mvp-comment-308-1
πατὴρ γάρ
759
mvp-comment-308-2
πρόσχημα
760
mvp-comment-309-1
ἡ γὰρ Δίκη
761
mvp-comment-310-1
ᾗ χρῆν σ’ ἀρήγειν
762
mvp-comment-311-1
The order of words in the MSS.,
ἐπεὶ πατὴρ οὗτος σός
, is probably right; the words would then fall from her with a certain deliberate bitterness.
Cp. 542
:
Ant. 44
ἦ γὰρ νοεῖς θάπτειν σθ’
(n.):
Ph. 101
λέγω σ’ ἐγὼ δόλῳ Φιλοκτήτην λαβεῖν
.
mvp-comment-312-1
μοῦνος
763
Ἑλλήνων
764
mvp-comment-312-2
Nauck requires
τὴν αὐτὸς αὑτοῦ
instead of
τὴν σὴν ὅμαιμον
, because Agamemnon's unique crime was the slaughter of his own child: as if the text did not convey this. Clytaemnestra means, ‘while mourning a father, you forget a sister.’
mvp-comment-312-3
532 f. The regular mode of expression would be,
οὐκ ἴσον λύπης καμὼν ἐμοί, ὁ σπείρας τῇ τικτούσῃ
. But, having written
ὅτ’ ἔσπειρε
, the poet explains
ἐμοί
by repeating the comparison in a new form,
ὥσπερ ἡ τίκτουσ’ ἐγώ
. (For
ὡς
or
ὥσπερ
after
ἴσος
, cp.
Lys. or. 19 § 36
ἡγοῦντο... τὰ ἐκεῖ...εἶναι ἴσα ὥσπερ τὰ ἐνθάδε
.) Those who reject v. 533 omit to notice that, without it, the words
οὐκ ἴσον καμὼν ἐμοί
would be unintelligible. Cp.
Aesch.
Ag. 1417
ἔθυσεν αὑτοῦ παῖδα, φιλτάτην ἐμοὶ
|
ὠδῖν’
.
mvp-comment-312-4
This assertion of the mother's superior claim is a counterpart to the doctrine of Athena in
Aesch.
Eum. 658
f.,
οὐκ ἔστι μήτηρ ἡ κεκλημένου τέκνου
|
τοκεύς, τροφὸς δὲ κύματος νεοσπόρου
. Cp. above,
Aesch. Eum. 366
n.
mvp-comment-313-1
τοῦ χάριν, τίνων
765
mvp-comment-313-2
The alternative, which most editors have preferred, is to take
τίνων
as the participle. But there is an insuperable objection to this, which seems to have escaped notice. The words,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could mean only, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
for what?’ They could not mean, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
to whom?’ The latter would be
τῷ χάριν τίνων
; See (
e.g.)
Aesch.
P. V. 985
καὶ μὴν ὀφείλων ἂν τίνοιμ’ αὐτῷ χάριν
:
Aesch.
Ag. 821
τούτων θεοῖσι χρὴ πολύμνηστον χάριν
|
τίνειν
. Hence the question,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could not possibly be answered by
Ἀργείων
. For, evidently, the latter word could not mean, (‘for a benefit conferred by) the Greeks.’ A scholiast in the Baroccian MS. (cr. n. on 545), who explains
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
by
τίνος χάριν ἀποδιδούς
, plainly meant, ‘showing gratitude for what?’—and his paraphrase was correct; only he overlooked the context.
mvp-comment-314-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ μετῆν
766
mvp-comment-315-1
ἀλλ’ ἀντ’ ἀδελφοῦ δῆτα
767
κτανὼν
768
mvp-comment-315-2
ἀντὶ ἀδελφοῦ
769
mvp-comment-315-3
τἄμ’
770
mvp-comment-316-1
παῖδες … διπλοῖ
771
mvp-comment-316-2
540 f. Nauck would prefer a single verse in place of these two, viz.
οὓς Ἰφιγενείας εἰκὸς ἦν θνῄσκειν πάρος
.
mvp-comment-317-1
ἢ
772
mvp-comment-317-2
ἢ τῶν ἐμῶν Ἅιδης
773
mvp-comment-318-1
δαίσασθαι
774
mvp-comment-318-2
The conj.
λῄσασθαι
775
mvp-comment-319-1
πανώλει
776
mvp-comment-319-2
παρεῖτο
777
mvp-comment-319-3
The sense does not absolutely require us to take
Μενέλεω δ’
778
mvp-comment-320-1
ἀβούλου
779
mvp-comment-320-2
κακοῦ γνώμην
780
mvp-comment-321-1
δοκῶ μέν
781
mvp-comment-321-2
εἰ καὶ
782
mvp-comment-322-1
εἰ φωνὴν λάβοι
783
mvp-comment-323-1
τοῖς πεπραγμένοις
784
mvp-comment-324-1
γνώμην δικαίαν σχοῦσα
785
mvp-comment-325-1
ἐρεῖς μὲν οὐχὶ
786
ἐρεῖς
787
ἐρεῖς … μ’ ὡς
788
mvp-comment-325-2
ἄρξασά τι λυπηρὸν
789
mvp-comment-325-3
τάδ’ ἐξήκους’
790
mvp-comment-326-1
τοῦ τεθνηκότος θ’ ὕπερ
791
mvp-comment-327-1
καὶ μὴν
792
mvp-comment-327-2
λόγους ἐξῆρχές με
793
mvp-comment-328-1
Clytaemnestra has argued that she was justified in slaying Agamemnon, because he had slain Iphigeneia. The topics of Electra's reply are as follows.
mvp-comment-328-2
(1) 558—562. The wife who slew her husband would be a criminal, even if the motive had been just retribution; but the real motive was her love for Aegisthus. (2) 563—576. Agamemnon was not a free agent in slaying Iphigeneia; the act was forced upon him by Artemis. (3) 577—583. Suppose, however, that he was a free agent, and wished to please his brother; still she was not justified in taking his life. (4) 584—594. And in any case her plea does not excuse her for living with the man who helped to slay her husband.—The speech then closes in a strain of reproach and defiance (595 —609).
mvp-comment-328-3
καὶ δὴ λέγω σοι
794
πατέρα
795
φὴς
796
mvp-comment-329-1
εἴτ’ οὖν … εἴτε
797
mvp-comment-329-2
λέξω
798
δείξω
799
mvp-comment-330-1
ὡς οὐ δίκῃ γ’
800
ἔσπασεν
801
πειθὼ
802
mvp-comment-331-1
κυναγὸν
803
mvp-comment-331-2
ποινὰς
804
mvp-comment-331-3
τὰ πολλὰ πνεύματ’ ἔσχ’
805
τὰ πολλὰ
806
ἔσχε
807
mvp-comment-331-4
Acc. to Aesch. (
Aesch.
Ag. 149
f.,
Aesch. Ag. 192
), the Greeks were detained by
adverse winds, blowing from the N.E. : and this seems to have been the account given in the
Cypria (
c. 776 B.C.), Proclus
Chrest. p. 455:
ἐπέσχεν αὐτοὺς τοῦ πλοῦ χειμῶνας ἐπιπέμπουσα
. But other authorities speak of a
calm. Thus
I. A. 9 ff.
οὔκουν φθόγγος γ’ οὔτ’ ὀρνίθων
|
οὔτε θαλάσσης· σιγαὶ δ’ ἀνέμων
|
τόνδε κατ’ Εὔριπον ἔχουσιν
. Schol.
Eur.
Or. 647
ἐπειράθη τῆς θεοῦ ὀργιζομένης καὶ κατεχούσης τοὺς ἀνέμους
. Tzetzes on Lycophron 183
χολωθεῖσα δ’ ἐπὶ τούτῳ ἡ θεὸς τοὺς ἀνέμους κατέσχεν
. Ovid (
Met. 13. 183
) combines both versions:
exspectata diu, nulla aut contraria classi | Flamina sunt.
mvp-comment-331-5
It has been objected that vessels provided with oars need not have been detained by a calm. But the ships of the Greek fleet were not light craft. Each carried from 50 to 120 armed men, besides
σκεύη πολεμικά
: and the warriors were also the rowers (cp.
Thuc. 1. 10
). It is intelligible, then, that they should await the aid of wind before attempting the passage of the Aegaean. We must remember, too, the strong and shifting currents in the Euripus (
στονόεντα πορθμόν
,
Soph.
Ant. 1145
:
παλιρρόχθοις ἐν Αὐλίδος τόποις
,
Aesch.
Ag. 191
).
mvp-comment-331-6
We cannot well render:—(1)‘He
suffered those tedious winds,’—supplying
ὁ πατήρ
from v. 558. Nor: (2) ‘She
directed those tedious winds at Aulis,’—a version which would at least require
ἐπ’ Αὐλίδι
. Cp.
Ph. 1119
ἔχε
|
δύσποτμον ἀρὰν ἐπ’ ἄλλοις
.
mvp-comment-331-7
The conjecture
πλοῖα
808
mvp-comment-331-8
Αὐλίδι
809
mvp-comment-332-1
ἢ )γὼ φράσω
810
κείνης
811
mvp-comment-333-1
ὡς ἐγὼ κλύω
812
mvp-comment-333-2
θεᾶς … κατ’ ἄλσος
813
mvp-comment-333-3
παίζων
814
mvp-comment-333-4
ποδοῖν
815
mvp-comment-334-1
ἔλαφον
816
mvp-comment-334-2
στικτὸν
817
mvp-comment-334-3
κεράστην
818
mvp-comment-334-4
οὗ κατὰ σφαγὰς
819
mvp-comment-335-1
ἐκκομπάσας ἔπος τι τυγχάνει
820
βαλών
821
mvp-comment-335-2
This is the reason against taking
τυγχάνει
with
βαλών
, as=‘he shoots and hits’; cp.
Il. 15. 581
θηρητὴρ ἐτύχησε βαλών
:
Her. 3. 35
εἰ...τοῦ παιδὸς...βαλὼν τύχοιμι
. The vaunt must then
precede the hit.
mvp-comment-335-3
Others take
βαλὼν
822
ἔπος
823
mvp-comment-335-4
Monk, with Musgrave, took
σφαγὰς
824
mvp-comment-336-1
ἐκ τοῦδε
825
mvp-comment-336-2
μηνίσασα
826
mvp-comment-336-3
Λητῴα κόρη
827
mvp-comment-337-1
ὡς
828
ἀντίσταθμον
829
mvp-comment-337-2
ἐκθύσειε
830
mvp-comment-338-1
ὧδ’ ἦν
831
mvp-comment-338-2
τὰ … θύματ’
832
mvp-comment-338-3
λύσις
833
mvp-comment-338-4
πρὸς οἶκον
834
mvp-comment-339-1
πολλὰ
835
mvp-comment-339-2
ἀντιβὰς
836
mvp-comment-339-3
μόλις
837
mvp-comment-340-1
εἰ δ’ οὖν
838
mvp-comment-340-2
ἐρῶ γὰρ καὶ τὸ σόν
839
mvp-comment-341-1
τούτου … οὕνεκ’
840
mvp-comment-341-2
νόμῳ
841
mvp-comment-342-1
ὅρα
842
μὴ … τιθῇς
843
τίθης
844
mvp-comment-342-2
Here, either
τίθης
or
τιθῇς
would be suitable. (1) With
τίθης
:—‘See that, in making this rule, you
are not making woe for yourself.’ This means that to make the rule (as she is doing) is at once (logically) to make the woe. (2) With
τιθῇς
: —‘See
lest, in making this rule, you
make woe for yourself’:
i.e., the rule may have the woe as a consequence. The woe is a future contingency (583
εἰ δίκης γε τυγχάνοις
), against which Electra warns her. On the whole, I now prefer
τιθῇς
.
Cp. 1003
ὅρα κακῶς πράσσοντε μὴ μείζω κακὰ
|
κτησώμεθ’
: fr. 82
ἀλλ’ ὅρα μὴ κρεῖσσον ᾖ
.
mvp-comment-342-3
τιθεῖσα … νόμον
845
mvp-comment-343-1
εἰ γὰρ κτενοῦμεν
846
mvp-comment-343-2
πρώτη
847
mvp-comment-344-1
εἰσόρα
848
mvp-comment-344-2
οὐκ οὖσαν
849
mvp-comment-344-3
τίθης
850
mvp-comment-344-4
εἰ … θέλεις
851
mvp-comment-345-1
τῷ παλαμναίῳ
852
mvp-comment-345-2
πρόσθεν ἐξαπώλεσας
853
mvp-comment-346-1
παιδοποιεῖς
854
mvp-comment-346-2
Erigonè, daughter of Aegisthus and Clytaemnestra (Tzetzes on
Lyc. 1374
), was mentioned by the early cyclic poet Cinaethon (
Paus. 2. 18. 6
), and was the theme of Sophocles in his
Ἠριγόνη
. Hyginus (
Hyg.
Fab. 122
) notices a son of Aegisthus named Aletes, who gives his name to a play by Sophocles, but does not record the mother: see p. xliii note 4.
mvp-comment-346-3
εὐσεβεῖς
855
mvp-comment-346-4
κἀξ εὐσεβῶν
856
mvp-comment-346-5
By
τοὺς...πρόσθεν εὐσεβεῖς
Electra means Orestes and herself. Both are ‘cast out’ of their just rights. Cp.
O.T. 611
φίλον ...ἐσθλὸν ἐκβαλεῖν
.
Eur.
El. 62
τεκοῦσα δ’ ἄλλους παῖδας Αἰγίσθῳ πάρα
|
πάρεργ’ Ὀρέστην κἀμὲ ποιεῖται δόμων.
mvp-comment-346-6
βλαστόντας
857
mvp-comment-346-7
ἐκβαλοῦσ’ ἔχεις
858
mvp-comment-347-1
πῶς ταῦτ’ ἐπαινέσαιμ’ ἄν
859
mvp-comment-347-2
ἢ
860
ἦ
861
καὶ τοῦτ’
862
ἄποινα
863
mvp-comment-348-1
αἰσχρῶς δ’
864
δ’
865
mvp-comment-348-2
ἐάν περ καὶ λέγῃς
866
mvp-comment-348-3
ἐχθροῖς γαμεῖσθαι
867
mvp-comment-348-4
These two verses, though not indispensable, seem genuine. Were they omitted, the transition from 592 to 595 would be somewhat abrupt.
mvp-comment-349-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ γὰρ
868
mvp-comment-349-2
πᾶσαν ἵης γλῶσσαν
869
mvp-comment-350-1
κακοστομοῦμεν
870
mvp-comment-350-2
καί σ’ ἔγωγε δεσπότιν
871
mvp-comment-350-3
εἰς ἡμᾶς
872
ἣ
873
mvp-comment-351-1
βίον μοχθηρόν
874
mvp-comment-351-2
ἔκ τε σοῦ
875
κακοῖς … ξυνοῦσα
876
mvp-comment-351-3
συννόμου
877
mvp-comment-352-1
ὁ δ’ ἄλλος
878
mvp-comment-352-2
χεῖρα σὴν
879
mvp-comment-352-3
τρίβει βίον
880
mvp-comment-352-4
603 The reason for writing
δή με σοὶ
881
δή μέ σοι
882
mvp-comment-352-5
μιάστορα
883
mvp-comment-353-1
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκα
884
mvp-comment-354-1
εἰς ἅπαντας
885
mvp-comment-354-2
χρῇς
886
mvp-comment-354-3
στόμαργον
887
mvp-comment-355-1
τῶνδε τῶν ἔ|ργων ἴδρις
888
mvp-comment-355-2
σχεδόν τι
889
mvp-comment-355-3
οὐ καταισχύνω
890
mvp-comment-356-1
ὁρῶ μένος πνέουσαν
891
μένος πνέουσαν
892
mvp-comment-356-2
σὺν δίκῃ ξύνεστι
893
mvp-comment-356-3
Other interpretations are:—(1) ‘I see that Electra is wroth; but as to whether she is in the right, I see no concern (anywhere),’—a timid way of saying that
Clytaemnestra shows no such concern. So the schol. (2) ‘I see that Clytaemnestra is angry, but not that she cares whether she is right’:—an inference from some gesture. Both these versions rely on the fact that
φροντίδος
(612) is plainly an echo of
φροντίδ’
(611). But: (
a) it does not follow that
φροντίδ’
is not
Electra's thought. (
b) It is surely clear that
πνέουσαν
must be Electra; and (
c) as in
Ant. 471
f., the second clause naturally refers to the same person.
mvp-comment-357-1
ποίας δ’ ἐμοὶ δεῖ
894
ἐμοὶ
895
μοι
896
δεῖ
897
mvp-comment-357-2
Others understand: (1) ‘If Electra has no consideration for justice, why should I have any consideration for her,—
i.e., show her any tenderness?’ Or: (2) ‘If she heeds not justice, why should I heed her?’ Neither view seems well suited to the context.
mvp-comment-358-1
καὶ ταῦτα
898
mvp-comment-358-2
τηλικοῦτος
899
mvp-comment-358-3
ἆρα
900
mvp-comment-358-4
χωρεῖν ἂν
901
εἰς πᾶν ἔργον
902
mvp-comment-359-1
εὖ νυν ἐπίστω
903
mvp-comment-359-2
ἔξωρα
904
mvp-comment-359-3
προσεικότα
905
mvp-comment-360-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
906
mvp-comment-360-2
ἡ … ἐκ σοῦ δυσμένεια
907
mvp-comment-360-3
ἐξαναγκάζει
908
αἰσχροῖς
909
mvp-comment-360-4
622 f. The word
θρέμμα
910
mvp-comment-360-5
ἦ σ’ ἐγὼ
911
mvp-comment-361-1
νιν
912
mvp-comment-361-2
εὑρίσκεται
913
mvp-comment-361-3
Cp. Milton,
Apology for Smectymnuus (in his
Prose Works, ed. Symmons, vol. I. p. 236): ‘I might also tell them [the prelates], what Electra in Sophocles, a wise virgin, answered her wicked mother, who thought herself too violently reproved by her the daughter: ‘'
Tis you that say it,
not I; you do the deeds, |
And your ungodly deeds find me the words.’’
mvp-comment-362-1
οὐ μὰ
914
mvp-comment-362-2
δέσποιναν
915
mvp-comment-362-3
Ἄρτεμιν
916
mvp-comment-362-4
θράσους τοῦδ’ οὐκ ἀλύξεις
917
μόλῃ
918
mvp-comment-363-1
ὁρᾷς
919
mvp-comment-363-2
ἐκφέρει
920
mvp-comment-363-3
The
v. l.
παρεῖσα
921
mvp-comment-364-1
οὐδὲ
922
mvp-comment-364-2
ὑπ’ εὐφήμου βοῆς
923
mvp-comment-364-3
ἐπειδὴ σοί γ’
924
mvp-comment-364-4
πᾶν λέγειν
925
mvp-comment-365-1
κελεύω
926
mvp-comment-365-2
τοὐμὸν στόμ’
927
mvp-comment-365-3
634 f. An altar, and probably an image, of Apollo stand before the palace. The attendant of Clytaemnestra carries offerings of various fruits, which she is now commanded to
raise, as with a gesture of solemn oblation (
ἔπαιρε
928
mvp-comment-365-4
ἡ παροῦσά μοι
929
mvp-comment-365-5
θύματα … πάγκαρπα
930
mvp-comment-366-1
λυτηρίους … δειμάτων
931
mvp-comment-366-2
ἀνάσχω
932
mvp-comment-367-1
κλύοις ἂν
933
mvp-comment-367-2
προστατήριε
934
mvp-comment-368-1
κεκρυμμένην
935
mvp-comment-368-2
οὐ γὰρ ἐν φίλοις
936
mvp-comment-369-1
πρὸς φῶς
937
mvp-comment-370-1
πολυγλώσσῳ
938
mvp-comment-370-2
σπείρῃ
939
mvp-comment-370-3
ματαίαν
940
mvp-comment-371-1
ὧδ’
941
mvp-comment-372-1
γὰρ
942
mvp-comment-372-2
δισσῶν ὀνείρων
943
mvp-comment-372-3
Jacobs Fr.(
ap. Wunder) understood, ‘
two dreams,’—as if Clyt.'s vision consisted of two parts,—the return of Agamemnon, and the growth from the sceptre (417—423). This seems forced. Still less can we assume that there was some second dream which Clyt. did not relate even to the Sun-god (425).
mvp-comment-372-4
Λύκεἰ ἄναξ
944
mvp-comment-373-1
ἐσθλά … ἐχθρά
945
mvp-comment-373-2
Cp.
Aesch.
Pers. 217
, where the Chorus are advising Atossa how to propitiate the gods after her dream:
εἴ τι φλαῦρον εἶδες, αἰτοῦ τῶνδ’ ἀποτροπὴν τελεῖν
, |
τὰ δ’ ἀγάθ’ ἐκτελῆ γενέσθαι σοί τε καὶ τέκνῳ σέθεν κ.τ.λ.
mvp-comment-373-3
ἔμπαλιν μέθες
946
mvp-comment-374-1
εἴ τινες
947
mvp-comment-375-1
ἀλλ’ ὧδε
948
mvp-comment-375-2
ἀβλαβεῖ βίῳ
949
mvp-comment-376-1
δόμους
950
mvp-comment-376-2
ἀμφέπειν
951
mvp-comment-376-3
φίλοισι
952
mvp-comment-377-1
εὐημεροῦσαν
953
mvp-comment-377-2
καὶ τέκνων
954
ὅσων
955
mvp-comment-377-3
We might also take
τέκνων
as standing, by attraction, for
τέκνοις
. When the antecedent is thus attracted, it usually comes after the relative (
O.C. 56); but sometimes precedes it, as in
Tr. 151
f.
τότ’ ἄν τις εἰσίδοιτο
... | ...
κακοῖσιν
(for
κακά
)
ο<*>ς ἐγὼ βαρύνομαι
. In examples of the latter kind, however, the acc. (and not, as it would be here, the dat.) is elsewhere the case attracted. In favour of taking
τέκνων
as partitive, it may be added that this suits the distinction between two groups of
τέκνα
. By
ὅσων
she means Chrysothemis, Iphianassa, and the offspring o<*> her union with Aegisthus (157; 589).
mvp-comment-377-4
ἐμοὶ … πρόσεστιν
956
mvp-comment-378-1
πᾶσιν ἡμῖν
957
mvp-comment-379-1
τὰ δ’ ἄλλα πάντα
958
mvp-comment-379-2
660 Following the directions given in vv. 39 ff., the Paedagogus now appears as a
ξένος Φωκεύς
. Cp.
O.T. 924 ff., where the messenger from Corinth presents himself to Iocasta and the Chorus.
mvp-comment-379-3
πῶς ἂν εἰδείην
959
mvp-comment-380-1
ἦ καὶ
960
mvp-comment-380-2
ἐπεικάζων κυρῶ
961
mvp-comment-380-3
πρέπ<*> γὰρ
962