mvp-comment-105-1
οὔτε γὰρ
1
mvp-comment-105-2
Κρῖσαν
2
mvp-comment-105-3
Crisa stood about two miles W.S.W. of Delphi, on a spur of Parnassus, at the lower outlet of the gorge through which the river Pleistus issues into the plain. The
Iliad mentions ‘sacred Crisa’ (
ζαθέην
, 2. 520). But the Homeric Hymn to the Pythian Apollo is the best witness to its ancient power. There, just as here, the name
Κρῖσα
includes the land which stretches southward from the town to its harbour on the ‘wide gulf’ (vv. 253— 261). We need not, then, read
Κρίσᾳ
or
Κρίσας
. Crisa was the earliest seat of trade on the western sea; Delphi, when first founded, was merely a sanctuary in its territory. Pindar recalls the old prominence of its name when he describes a Pythian victory as won
Κρισαίαις ἐνὶ πτυχαῖς
(
P. 6. 18).
mvp-comment-105-4
Cirrha, a town of much later date, was the port of Crisa on the gulf. About 585 B.C., the Delphians, aided by Cleisthenes of Sicyon and his allies, succeeded, after a long struggle, in humbling Crisa and destroying Cirrha. The Crisaean plain was then devoted to Apollo, whose domain was thus extended from his temple to the coast. When Sophocles wrote, that ground was still a
βούνομος ἀκτή
, inviolable by plough or spade. It was not till the middle of the next century that the alleged encroachments of Amphissa on the
ἱερὰ χώρα
gave a pretext for war to the Amphictyons (355 B.C.).
mvp-comment-105-5
Ulrichs (
Reisen in Griechenland) was the first to place the relations of Crisa and Cirrha in a clear light. Strabo correctly describes the site of Cirrha, but erroneously places Crisa to the east of it (9. p. 418).
mvp-comment-106-1
βούνομον
3
βουνόμον
4
mvp-comment-106-2
βούνομον ἀκτὰν
5
Κρῖσαν
6
mvp-comment-107-1
ἀπερίτροπος
7
mvp-comment-108-1
παρὰ τὸν Ἀχέροντα
8
ἀνάσσων
9
θεὸς
10
mvp-comment-109-1
μὲν
11
mvp-comment-109-2
ὁ πολὺς … βίοτος
12
mvp-comment-109-3
ἀνέλπιστος
13
mvp-comment-109-4
187 *
τεκέων
. I am now satisfied that this is a true correction of
τοκέων
14
ἅτις
15
τοκέων
16
mvp-comment-110-1
ἁπερεί
17
mvp-comment-110-2
ἔποικος
18
mvp-comment-111-1
οἰκονομῶ θαλάμους
19
mvp-comment-112-1
ἀεικεῖ σὺν στολᾷ
20
mvp-comment-113-1
κεναῖς δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
21
ἀμφίσταμαι
22
mvp-comment-113-2
Hartung, reading
κενὰ δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
, takes the sense to be that she stands ‘hungry’ by the tables at which the others feast. But
κενή
as=
νῆστις
would be neither usual nor elegant.
mvp-comment-114-1
Hitherto the Chorus have offered consolation or counsel. At v. 213 they return to that strain. But here, moved by Electra's misery, they join with her in bewailing its cause.
mvp-comment-114-2
οἰκτρὰ μὲν … πλαγά
23
κοίταις
24
οἰκτρὰ … αὐδὰ
25
mvp-comment-114-3
Sophocles, who follows the Homeric story as to the banquet, could not but remember the
οἰκτροτάτην ὄπα
of the dying Cassandra. And this might naturally suggest to him that other
οἰκτρὰ αὐδή
which she had uttered at an earlier moment, immediately after Agamemnon's return,—her presage of his fate, and her own:
Aesch.
Ag. 1072
—1314.
mvp-comment-114-4
The sense then is:—‘There was a voice of lamentation at the return from Troy’; alluding especially to Cassandra's laments, but also, perhaps, to forebodings in the mouth of the people at Mycenae. ‘And there was a voice of lamentation
ἐν κοίταις πατρῴαις
, when thy father lay on the couch at the fatal banquet.’ The ‘voice’ at the banquet is, first, that of the dying Agamemnon; but Sophocles may have thought also of Cassandra's death-cry, which was sounding in the king's ears as he fell.—For other interpretations, see Appendix.
mvp-comment-114-5
νόστοις
26
ἐν
27
mvp-comment-114-6
κοίταις
28
mvp-comment-114-7
ὅτε οἱ
29
σοι
30
ἀνταία
31
mvp-comment-114-8
γενύων
32
mvp-comment-115-1
δόλος … ἔρος
33
mvp-comment-116-1
δεινὰν δεινῶς
34
δεινὰν … μορφάν
35
mvp-comment-116-2
εἴτ’ οὖν … εἴτε
36
βροτῶν
37
mvp-comment-117-1
πλέον … ἐχθίστα
38
mvp-comment-117-2
δὴ
39
mvp-comment-118-1
νὺξ
40
mvp-comment-118-2
δείπνων
41
mvp-comment-119-1
ἄχθη
42
τοῖς
43
θανάτους
44
mvp-comment-119-2
διδύμαιν χειροῖν
45
διδύμοιν
46
mvp-comment-120-1
εἷλον … πρόδοτον
47
mvp-comment-121-1
οἷς
48
mvp-comment-121-2
Ὀλύμπιος
49
mvp-comment-122-1
ποίνιμα
50
mvp-comment-123-1
ἀγλαΐας
51
mvp-comment-123-2
ἀποναίατο
52
mvp-comment-124-1
πόρσω
53
mvp-comment-125-1
γνώμαν ἴσχεις
54
mvp-comment-125-2
ἐξ οἵων
55
mvp-comment-125-3
τὰ παρόντ’
56
mvp-comment-125-4
οἰκείας
57
mvp-comment-126-1
πολύ … τι κακῶν
58
mvp-comment-126-2
ὑπερεκτήσω
59
mvp-comment-127-1
τὰ δὲ
60
οὐκ ἐριστὰ τοῖς δυνατοῖς
61
πλάθειν
62
mvp-comment-127-2
ἐριστά
63
mvp-comment-127-3
πλάθειν
64
mvp-comment-128-1
δεινοῖς ἠναγκάσθην
65
mvp-comment-129-1
ὀργά
66
ἔξοιδ’
67
mvp-comment-130-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
68
mvp-comment-130-2
ἐν … δεινοῖς
69
mvp-comment-130-3
σχήσω
70
mvp-comment-130-4
ταύτας ἄτας
71
mvp-comment-131-1
ὄφρα
72
mvp-comment-131-2
βίος ἔχῃ με
73
σχήσω
74
mvp-comment-132-1
τίνι γάρ … τίνι φρονοῦντι καίρια
75
ἀκούσαιμ’ ἂν πρόσφορον ἔπος
76
τίνι
77
πρόσφορον
78
mvp-comment-132-2
Other explanations are:—(1) Taking the dative with
πρόσφορον
:—‘To what person who feels aright would that word be suitable which I should hear (=which would be said of me)?’ That is: Should I not deserve to incur a censure from which every right-minded person would shrink? Should I not deserve to be called
δυσσεβής
? This seems forced; and it does not well suit
ἔπος
. (2) Taking the dative with
ἀκούσαιμι
:—‘At whose mouth (=
from whom), that thinks aright, could I hear a suitable word of comfort?’ But such a dative seems impossible. In
Il. 16. 515
δύνασαι δὲ σὺ πάντοσ’ ἀκούειν
|
ἀνέρι κηδομένῳ
, the dat. is one of interest, denoting the person whose prayer is heard (‘
for him’); cp.
Il. 5. 115
κλῦθί μοι
: 24. 335
ἔκλυες ᾧ κ’ ἐθέλῃσθα
.
mvp-comment-133-1
ἄνετε
79
mvp-comment-133-2
ἄλυτα
80
mvp-comment-133-3
κεκλήσεται
81
mvp-comment-133-4
231 f. For
ἐκ
82
mvp-comment-133-5
ἀνάριθμος
83
θρήνων
84
mvp-comment-134-1
ἀλλ’ οὖν
85
γε
86
εὐνοίᾳ
87
mvp-comment-135-1
μάτηρ ὡσεί τις
88
mvp-comment-136-1
μὴ τίκτειν
89
mvp-comment-136-2
ἄταν ἄταις
90
mvp-comment-137-1
καὶ τί μέτρον
91
κακότατος
92
mvp-comment-137-2
φέρε
93
mvp-comment-137-3
ἐπὶ τοῖς φθ.
94
mvp-comment-138-1
ἔβλαστ’
95
mvp-comment-139-1
τούτοις
96
mvp-comment-140-1
εἴ τῳ πρόσκειμαι χρηστῷ
97
mvp-comment-141-1
ξυνναίοιμ’
98
mvp-comment-141-2
εὔκηλος
99
mvp-comment-141-3
γονέων
100
ἐκτίμους
101
mvp-comment-141-4
ἐκτίμους ἵσχουσα
102
mvp-comment-141-5
πτέρυγας … γόων
103
mvp-comment-141-6
ὀξυτόνων
104
mvp-comment-142-1
εἰ γὰρ
105
mvp-comment-142-2
γᾶ
106
mvp-comment-142-3
οὐδὲν
107
ὢν
108
εἰ
109
mvp-comment-142-4
Electra is contrasting her father, whose earthly life has been cut short, with his murderers, who survive. But she believes that his spirit lives in the world below, and will be active in aiding the vengeance (453 ff.).
mvp-comment-142-5
πάλιν
110
mvp-comment-142-6
ἀντιφόνους δίκας
111
mvp-comment-143-1
ἔρροι τ’
112
mvp-comment-143-2
αἰδὼς
113
εὐσέβεια
114
mvp-comment-144-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
115
mvp-comment-144-2
καὶ
116
τὸ σὸν … καὶ τοὐμὸν
117
mvp-comment-145-1
νίκα
118
mvp-comment-145-2
ἅμα
119
mvp-comment-146-1
πολλοῖσι θρήνοις
120
mvp-comment-147-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
121
mvp-comment-148-1
ἥτις εὐγενὴς γυνή
122
mvp-comment-149-1
πατρῷα … πήματα
123
mvp-comment-150-1
κατ’ εὐφρόνην
124
mvp-comment-150-2
θάλλοντα
125
mvp-comment-151-1
ᾗ
126
mvp-comment-151-2
πρῶτα μὲν … εἶτα … ἔπειτα
127
ᾗ
128
mvp-comment-151-3
τὰ μητρὸς
129
mvp-comment-151-4
ἔχθιστα συμβέβηκεν
130
mvp-comment-152-1
κἀκ τῶνδ’ ἄρχομαι
131
mvp-comment-153-1
λαβεῖν … τὸ τητᾶσθαι
132
mvp-comment-154-1
ποίας
133
δοκεῖς
134
mvp-comment-155-1
ἴδω
135
εἰσίδω δ’
136
ἴδω δὲ
137
mvp-comment-155-2
μὲν
138
mvp-comment-156-1
ἐσθήματα
139
mvp-comment-156-2
ἐκείνῳ
140
mvp-comment-156-3
παρεστίους … λοιβάς
141
ἔνθ’ ἐκεῖνον ὤλεσεν
142
mvp-comment-156-4
Acc. to
Homer. Hymn. 29. 4 ff., feasts began and ended with libations to Hestia:
οὐ γὰρ ἄτερ σοῦ
|
εἰλαπίναι θνητοῖσιν, ἵν’ οὐ πρώτῃ πυμάτῃ τε
|
Ἱστίῃ ἀρχόμενος σπένδει μελιηδέα οἶνον
. Soph. fr. 658
<*> πρῷρα λοιβῆς Ἑστία
. Other divinities, including Zeus
σωτήρ
, were similarly honoured; then the paean was sung, and the
πότος
began ( Plat.
Symp.p. 176 A).
mvp-comment-157-1
τούτων
143
mvp-comment-158-1
αὐτοέντην
144
mvp-comment-158-2
Brunck first adopted
αὐτοέντην
145
αὐτοφόντην
146
mvp-comment-158-3
ἡμὶν
147
mvp-comment-159-1
ταλαίνῃ
148
mvp-comment-160-1
ταύτην … τῷδε
149
mvp-comment-161-1
μιάστορι
150
Ἐρινὺν
151
mvp-comment-162-1
ἐγγελῶσα τοῖς ποιουμένοις
152
mvp-comment-163-1
εὑροῦς’
153
τότε
154
mvp-comment-163-2
The conjecture
φρουροῦς’
155
τηροῦς’
156
mvp-comment-164-1
χοροὺς ἵστησι
157
mvp-comment-164-2
μηλοσφαγεῖ … ἱερὰ
158
mvp-comment-164-3
ἔμμην’ ἱερά
159
mvp-comment-164-4
τοῖς σωτηρίοις
160
mvp-comment-164-5
Argive tradition placed Agamemnon's death on the 13th of Gamelion (about the end of January). So said ‘the Argive historians’ (
οἱ Ἀργολικοὶ συγγραφεῖς
),— according to an Argive writer named Deinias, who lived about 225 B.C. (Schol. here: Müller,
Frag. Hist. vol. III. p. 25.) Possibly, then, the idea of Clytaemnestra's hideous festival may have been suggested to the poet by some actual commemoration of the event in Argolis. There was a cult of Agamemnon in various places,—notably in Laconia. (Cp. Roscher's
Lexicon, p. 96.)
mvp-comment-165-1
ἡ δύσμορος
161
κατὰ στέγας
162
mvp-comment-166-1
τέτηκα
163
mvp-comment-166-2
πατρὸς
164
mvp-comment-166-3
The
δαίς
is the feast which, in Homeric fashion (
Il. 1. 467
), would follow the sacrifice (281). Acc. to Eustathius p. 1507. 61 (on
Hom.
Od. 4. 524
ff.),
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαὶς
(or
τράπεζα
) was a proverb
ἐπὶ τῶν ἐπ’ ὀλέθρῳ εὐωχουμένων
. The poet may mean that Clytaemnestra called the festival
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαίς
, in direct allusion to
δεῖπνα ἄρρητα
(203): and this would give a special point to
ἐγγελῶσα
(277). Cp.
Eur.
Or. 1008
τά τ’ ἐπώνυμα δεῖπνα Θυέστου
. But the words do not necessarily imply more than that she called it
Ἀγαμεμνόνεια
.
mvp-comment-167-1
αὐτὴ πρὸς αὑτήν
165
αὑτήν
166
mvp-comment-167-2
κλαῦσαι
167
mvp-comment-167-3
ἡδονὴν φέρει
168
mvp-comment-168-1
ἡ λόγοισι γενναία
169
mvp-comment-169-1
φωνοῦσα
170
mvp-comment-170-1
δύσθεον
171
mvp-comment-170-2
μίσημα
172
mvp-comment-170-3
σοὶ μόνῃ
173
mvp-comment-170-4
τέθνηκεν
174
mvp-comment-170-5
ἐν πένθει
175
mvp-comment-171-1
ἐκ γόων
176
mvp-comment-171-2
οἱ κάτω θεοί
177
mvp-comment-172-1
τάδ’
178
mvp-comment-172-2
ἥξοντ’ Ὀρέστην
179
mvp-comment-173-1
παραστᾶς’
180
mvp-comment-174-1
ἥτις
181
mvp-comment-174-2
ὑπεξέθου
182
mvp-comment-175-1
ἀλλ’ ἴσθι τοι τείσουσά γ’
183
mvp-comment-176-1
ὑλακτεῖ
184
mvp-comment-176-2
σὺν
185
mvp-comment-176-3
πέλας
186
παρών
187
mvp-comment-176-4
301 The adv.
πάντα
188
mvp-comment-176-5
ἄναλκις
189
mvp-comment-176-6
ἡ πᾶσα βλάβη
190
mvp-comment-177-1
σὺν γυναιξὶ
191
mvp-comment-177-2
τὰς μάχας
192
mvp-comment-178-1
ἐφήξειν
193
mvp-comment-179-1
μέλλων … δρᾶν τι
194
mvp-comment-179-2
τὰς οὔσας τε … καὶ τὰς ἀπούσας
195
mvp-comment-179-3
μου
196
μοι
197
mvp-comment-179-4
διέφθορεν
198
mvp-comment-180-1
σωφρονεῖν
199
εὐσεβεῖν
200
mvp-comment-180-2
ἔν τοι κακοῖς
201
mvp-comment-180-3
πολλή )στ’ ἀνάγκη
202
κἀπιτηδεύειν κακά
203
mvp-comment-180-4
I place only a comma, not a colon, after
πάρεστιν
204
mvp-comment-181-1
ὄντος … βεβῶτος
205
mvp-comment-182-1
ἦ κάρτα
206
mvp-comment-182-2
θυραῖον
207
mvp-comment-182-3
οἰχνεῖν
208
mvp-comment-182-4
ἀγροῖσι
209
mvp-comment-182-5
τυγχάνει
210
mvp-comment-183-1
ἦ κἂν … ἱκοίμην
211
ἦ τ<*>ν
212
ἦ δἂν
213
mvp-comment-183-2
ἐς λόγους τοὺς σοὺς ἱκοίμην
214
mvp-comment-184-1
ὡς νῦν
215
ὥς νυν
216
mvp-comment-184-2
ἱστόρει· τί σοι φίλον
217
τό
218
τά
219
mvp-comment-184-3
With the other punctuation,
ἱστόρει τί σοι φίλον
220
mvp-comment-185-1
καὶ δὴ
221
mvp-comment-185-2
τοῦ κασιγνήτου τί φής
222
mvp-comment-185-3
ἥξοντος
223
ἢ μέλλοντος
224
mvp-comment-186-1
φησίν γε
225
mvp-comment-186-2
ποεῖ
226
mvp-comment-187-1
καὶ μὴν ἔγωγ’
227
γε
228
mvp-comment-187-2
οὐκ ὄκνῳ
229
mvp-comment-188-1
ἀρκεῖν
230
mvp-comment-189-1
ἐπεί
231
mvp-comment-189-2
μακρὰν
232
mvp-comment-189-3
324 Here, as in 316,
νῦν
233
νυν
234
mvp-comment-189-4
δόμων
235
φέρουσαν
236
mvp-comment-190-1
ὅμαιμον
237
mvp-comment-190-2
φύσιν
238
mvp-comment-191-1
Χρυσόθεμιν
239
mvp-comment-192-1
οἷα
240
νομίζεται
241
mvp-comment-193-1
πρὸς θυρῶνος ἐξόδοις
242
φωνεῖς
243
ἐλθοῦσα
244
αὖ
245
mvp-comment-193-2
330 For the absence of caesura, cp.
Ph. 101
n.
mvp-comment-194-1
θυμῷ … χαρίζεσθαι
246
mvp-comment-195-1
καίτοι τοσοῦτόν γ’ οἶδα
247
mvp-comment-195-2
κἀμαυτήν, ὅτι
248
mvp-comment-195-3
333 f. For the repeated
ἄν
249
mvp-comment-195-4
οἶ) αὐτοῖς φρονῶ
250
mvp-comment-196-1
ὑφειμένῃ
251
πλεῖν
252
mvp-comment-196-2
For the image, cp.
Eur.
Med. 524
ἄκροισι λαίφους κρασπέδοις
(with close-reefed sails)
ὑπεκφυγεῖν
|
τὴν σὴν στόμαργον, ὦ γύναι, γλωσσαλγίαν
:
Ar.
Ran. 997
ἀλλ’ ὅπως, ὦ γεννάδα
, |
μὴ πρὸς ὀργὴν ἀντιλέξεις
, |
ἀλλὰ συστείλας, ἄκροισι
|
χρώμενος τοῖς ἱστίοις κ.τ.λ.
: and conversely
Soph.
Ant. 715
ναὸς ὅστις ἐγκρατῆ πόδα
|
τείνας ὑπείκει μηδέν
.
Ovid
Epist. 1. 8. 71
moderatius opta, | Et voti, quaeso, contrahe vela tui.
Shakesp.
Henry VI., pt. iii, act 3 sc. 3. 5
‘Now Margaret | Must strike her sail, and learn awhile to serve | Where kings command.’
mvp-comment-197-1
καὶ μὴ δοκεῖν
253
mvp-comment-198-1
τοιαῦτα δ’ ἄλλα
254
ἀλλὰ
255
ἄλλα
256
mvp-comment-199-1
καίτοι τὸ μὲν δίκαιον
257
mvp-comment-199-2
κρίνεις
258
mvp-comment-199-3
εἰ … με δεῖ
259
mvp-comment-199-4
ἐλευθέραν
260
mvp-comment-199-5
ζῆν
261
mvp-comment-199-6
πάντ’
262
mvp-comment-199-7
ἀκουστέα
263
mvp-comment-200-1
δεινόν γε
264
mvp-comment-201-1
τῆς … τικτούσης
265
mvp-comment-201-2
μέλειν
266
mvp-comment-202-1
τἀμὰ νουθετήματα
267
mvp-comment-202-2
κείνης διδακτά
268
mvp-comment-202-3
ἐκ σαυτῆς
269
mvp-comment-203-1
The text, which has been suspected (cr. n.), is sound; but the train of thought is somewhat obscured by compression.
mvp-comment-203-2
‘You forget your father, and care only for your mother. All your counsels to me come from her. Then (
ἔπειτα
),—that being so,—give up the attempt at a compromise. Make a
choice (
ἑλοῦ γε
). You can be imprudent (
φρονεῖν κακῶς
),—as you say that I am,—and loyal to your dead father. Or you can be prudent (
φρονοῦσα
), and forgetful of him,—as you actually are; you who (
ἥτις
) say, indeed, that you would show your hatred of the murderers if you could; and yet, when I
do resist them, you try to turn me from my purpose. You merely add the shame of cowardice to our woes.’
mvp-comment-203-3
ἔπειθ’
270
mvp-comment-203-4
ἑλοῦ γε
271
mvp-comment-203-5
φρονεῖν κακῶς
272
mvp-comment-203-6
Other explanations are:—(1) ‘Choose to be thought either
lost to right feeling, or, if you have such feeling, then at least
forgetful of your duty.’ (2) ‘Choose to seem either
unintelligent (if you are merely the blind instrument of our rulers); or, if you act with clear understanding (
φρονοῦσα
),—thinking to benefit me,—at least forgetful of your father.’ Both these views assume that the question is merely between two interpretations which might be placed on the present conduct of Chrysothemis. But Electra is putting the dilemma between imprudent loyalty and prudent disloyalty.
mvp-comment-204-1
τῶν φίλων
273
mvp-comment-205-1
ἥτις
274
φρονοῦσα
275
μῖσος
276
mvp-comment-206-1
πάντα
277
mvp-comment-206-2
τιμωρουμένης
278
mvp-comment-207-1
οὔτε … τε
279
mvp-comment-207-2
τήν τε δρῶσαν
280
mvp-comment-208-1
πρὸς κακοῖσι
281
mvp-comment-208-2
δειλίαν ἔχει
282
mvp-comment-209-1
ἐπεὶ
283
mvp-comment-209-2
ἢ μάθ’ ἐξ ἐμοῦ
284
mvp-comment-210-1
ἐπαρκούντως
285
mvp-comment-211-1
προσάπτειν
286
mvp-comment-211-2
εἴ τις ἔστ’ ἐκεῖ χάρις
287
mvp-comment-212-1
ἡμὶν
288
ξύνει
289
mvp-comment-213-1
τὰ σὰ … δῶῤ
290
mvp-comment-213-2
ἐφ’ οἶσι
291
mvp-comment-213-3
χλιδᾷς
292
mvp-comment-214-1
ὑπεικάθοιμι
293
mvp-comment-214-2
πλουσία
294
mvp-comment-214-3
περιρρείτω
295
mvp-comment-215-1
τοὐμὲ μὴ λυπεῖν
296
mvp-comment-215-2
Remark the resemblance to the passage where Antigone—summing up her position—compares the
moral pain of neglecting her duty with those penalties which she contemns:—
κείνοις ἂν ἤλγουν· τοῖσδε δ’ οὐκ ἀλγύνομαι
(
Ant. 468
). There, too, we have a Sophoclean triad of clauses, the third echoing the first,—as
τῆς σῆς δ’ οὐκ ἐρῶ τιμῆς τυχεῖν
here reiterates the sense of
σοὶ δὲ πλουσία... βίος
(n. on
Ant. 465
ff.).
mvp-comment-215-3
One of the scholia recognises the traditional reading, and explains it correctly: —
τοῦτο μόνον ἐμὲ βοσκέτω, τὸ μὴ λυπεῖν ἐμὲ αὐτήν, εἰ
(‘as I should do, if’)
τοῖς φονεῦσι τοῦ πατρὸς πείθεσθαι ἀναγκασθήσομαι
.—The conjectures have been numerous: see Appendix.
mvp-comment-216-1
οὐδ’ ἂν σὺ
297
mvp-comment-217-1
παῖδα
298
mvp-comment-217-2
κεκλῆσθαι
299
mvp-comment-218-1
πλείστοις
300
mvp-comment-219-1
μηδὲν
301
πρὸς ὀργὴν
302
mvp-comment-220-1
ἀμφοῖν
303
τοῖς λόγοις
304
mvp-comment-221-1
τῆσδε … αὕτη
305
πάλιν
306
mvp-comment-222-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
307
mvp-comment-222-2
πως
308
mvp-comment-222-3
μύθων
309
mvp-comment-223-1
οὐδ’
310
κοὐδ’
311
ποτέ
312
mvp-comment-224-1
ἰὸν
313
mvp-comment-224-2
σχήσει
314
mvp-comment-225-1
τὸ δεινὸν
315
mvp-comment-225-2
εἰ γὰρ τῶνδέ μοι
316
εἰ
317
mvp-comment-226-1
γὰρ
318
mvp-comment-226-2
γόων
319
λόγων
320
mvp-comment-227-1
ἐνταῦθα
321
mvp-comment-227-2
ἔνθα μή ποτε … προσόψει
322
mvp-comment-227-3
ζῶσα
323
mvp-comment-227-4
κατηρεφεῖ
324
mvp-comment-227-5
χθονὸς τῆσδ’ ἐκτὸς
325
mvp-comment-227-6
ὑμνήσεις
326
mvp-comment-228-1
πρὸς ταῦτα
327
mvp-comment-228-2
Nauck reads
κοὔ
328
καί
329
mvp-comment-228-3
ἐν καλῷ, εὔκαιρον
schol.:
H. 4. 3. 5
νομίσαντες οὐκ ἐν καλῷ εἶναι πρὸς τοὺς ὁπλίτας ἱππομαχεῖν
: so, too,
Eur.
Heracl. 971
, etc. Cp.
καλόν
(
ἐστι
)=
καίριον
in
Soph.
Ph. 1155
; and
εἰς καλόν
=
καιρίως
in
O.T. 78.
mvp-comment-229-1
ἦ ταῦτα δὴ
330
ἦ … δὴ
331
ἦ … γὰρ
332
mvp-comment-229-2
καὶ βεβούλευνται
333
mvp-comment-230-1
ἀλλ’ ἐξίκοιτο
334
mvp-comment-230-2
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκ’
335
mvp-comment-231-1
τίνα … τόνδ’
336
mvp-comment-231-2
τάλαινα
337
mvp-comment-232-1
εἴ τι τῶνδε
338
mvp-comment-233-1
ποῦ ποτ’ εἶ φρενῶν
339
mvp-comment-234-1
ὅπως
340
ὑμῶν
341
mvp-comment-234-2
προσώτατ’
342
προσωτάτω φύγω
343
mvp-comment-235-1
βίου … τοῦ παρόντος
344
mvp-comment-236-1
καλὸς γὰρ
345
mvp-comment-236-2
θαυμάσαι
346
mvp-comment-237-1
τοῖς φίλοις
347
mvp-comment-238-1
εἰκαθεῖν
348
mvp-comment-239-1
ταῦτα
349
οὐκ ἐμοὺς
350
mvp-comment-240-1
γε
351
μέντοι
352
mvp-comment-240-2
μὴ )ξ
353
mvp-comment-240-3
πεσεῖν
354
mvp-comment-240-4
399 A woman, speaking of herself in the plur., uses the masc.:
Ant. 926
παθόντες ἂν ξυγγνοῖμεν ἡμαρτηκότες
.
mvp-comment-241-1
συγγνώμην
355
mvp-comment-242-1
τἄπη
356
mvp-comment-242-2
πρὸς κακῶν
357
mvp-comment-243-1
μή πω
358
mvp-comment-244-1
οἷπερ … ὁδοῦ
359
mvp-comment-245-1
τῷ φέρεις
360
mvp-comment-245-2
ἔμπυρα
361
mvp-comment-246-1
τυμβεῦσαι χοάς
362
mvp-comment-247-1
βροτῶν
363
mvp-comment-248-1
ὃν ἔκταν’ αὐτή
364
ὅν γ’
365
mvp-comment-249-1
τῷ τοῦτ’ ἤρεσεν
366
mvp-comment-250-1
δείματος
367
mvp-comment-250-2
δοκεῖν ἐμοί
368
mvp-comment-251-1
θεοὶ πατρῷοι
369
mvp-comment-251-2
συγγένεσθέ γ’
370
mvp-comment-251-3
ἀλλὰ νῦν
371
mvp-comment-252-1
εἴποιμ’ ἂν τότε
372
mvp-comment-253-1
ἐπὶ σμικρὸν
373
ἐπὶ σμικρῶν
374
mvp-comment-253-2
φράσαι
375
mvp-comment-254-1
σμικροὶ λόγοι
376
mvp-comment-255-1
πατρὸς … δευτέραν ὁμιλίαν
377
mvp-comment-255-2
ἐφέστιον πῆξαι
378
mvp-comment-255-3
This sceptre is described in the
Iliad (2. 101 f.) as the work of Hephaestus, who gave it Zeus; Hermes transmitted it to Pelops, from whom it passed to Atreus and Agamemnon. The Homeric sceptre is often called
χρύσεον
(
Il. 2. 268
, etc.), prob. as being ornamented with gold foil, or studded with gold nails (
Il. 1. 246
χρυσείοις ἥλοισι πεπαρμένον
). Among the objects found at Mycenae are some supposed remains of such sceptres (Schliem.,
Myc. 201, etc.).
mvp-comment-255-4
οὑφόρει ποτέ
379
mvp-comment-256-1
ἔκ τε
380
ἐκ δὲ
381
mvp-comment-256-2
βρύοντα
382
mvp-comment-256-3
ᾧ … γενέσθαι
383
mvp-comment-256-4
The vision resembles that of Astyages, who dreamed that a vine sprang from his daughter Mandanè, the wife of Cambyses,
τὴν δὲ ἄμπελον ἐπισχεῖν τὴν Ἀσίην πᾶσαν
. The
ὀνειροπόλοι
explained this to mean that her son (Cyrus) should reign in his grandfather's stead. (
Her. 1. 108.
) The spreading branches figure also in the dream of Xerxes (7. 19):
ἐδόκεε...ἐστεφανῶσθαι ἐλαίης θαλλῷ, ἀπὸ δὲ τῆς ἐλαίης τοὺς κλάδους γῆν πᾶσαν ἐπισχεῖν
.
mvp-comment-256-5
In choosing the
sceptre of Agamemnon as the stock from which the wondrous growth is put forth, Sophocles may have had in mind the words of Achilles (
Il. 1. 234
ff.);
ναὶ μὰ τόδε σκῆπτρον· τὸ μὲν οὔποτε φύλλα καὶ ὄζους
|
φύσει, ἐπεὶ δὴ πρῶτα τομὴν ἐν ὄρεσσι λέλοιπεν
, |
οὐδ’ ἀναθηλήσει
.
mvp-comment-257-1
του παρόντος
384
τοῦ
385
παρόντος
386
του
387
mvp-comment-257-2
Ἡλίῳ δείκνυσι τοὖναρ
388
mvp-comment-258-1
οὐ κάτοιδα, πλὴν
389
mvp-comment-258-2
πέμπει με κείνη
390
mvp-comment-259-1
These three verses, which the MSS. give to Electra, and which several recent critics reject (cr. n.), clearly belong to Chrysothemis, and are genuine. Electra's exclamation of joy (411) caused Chrysothemis to ask if her sister had any ground for hope (412). Electra replied that, when she had heard the dream, she would say. This showed her sister that Electra relied merely on the fact that Clytaemnestra had seen
some fearful vision. Now, therefore, instead of asking for Electra's interpretation, she merely repeats her counsel (383 f.) before proceeding on her errand. The words
πρός
νυν θεῶν κ.τ.λ.
(428 ff.) show the train of her thought. To Chrysothemis, the alarm of Clytaemnestra (427) is more important than the apparition of Agamemnon. The dream is only a new reason why Electra should be cautious,—not why she should hope.
mvp-comment-259-2
The current ascription of the verses to Electra was doubtless prompted by verse 413. It was supposed that the recital of Chrysothemis must be immediately followed by the comments of Electra. But, as Hermann observed, the phrase
ἀβουλίᾳ πεσεῖν
would alone suffice to show that the verses belong to Chrysothemis (
cp. 398
). Nor could the warning,
σὺν κακῷ μέτει πάλιν
, be fitly uttered by Electra.
mvp-comment-259-3
τῶν ἐγγενῶν
391
mvp-comment-260-1
ἀβουλίᾳ
392
mvp-comment-260-2
σὺν κακῷ
393
mvp-comment-260-3
μέτει
394
mvp-comment-261-1
ἀλλ’
395
mvp-comment-261-2
ὦ φίλη
396
τούτων μὲν
397
mvp-comment-262-1
οὐ … θέμις
398
οὐδ’ ὅσιον
399
mvp-comment-262-2
ἐχθρᾶς ἀπὸ γυναικὸς
400
mvp-comment-262-3
κτερίσματ’
401
mvp-comment-262-4
λουτρὰ
402
mvp-comment-263-1
ἀλλ’ ἢ πνοαῖσιν
403
ῥοαῖσιν
404
mvp-comment-263-2
κρύψον
405
mvp-comment-263-3
νιν
406
mvp-comment-263-4
ἔνθα μή ποτ’
407
ἔνθεν
408
mvp-comment-263-5
εὐνὴν
409
mvp-comment-264-1
ἀλλ’ ὅταν θάῃν
410
mvp-comment-264-2
The conjecture
ἔστ’ ἂν
411
ὅταν
412
σῳζέσθω
413
mvp-comment-264-3
κειμήλἰ
414
mvp-comment-265-1
ἀρχὴν
415
τλημονεστάτη
416
mvp-comment-266-1
ἔβλαστε
417
mvp-comment-267-1
ὅν γ’ … τῷδ’
418
mvp-comment-267-2
ἐπέστεφε
419
mvp-comment-267-3
442 f. The position of
αὐτῇ
420
mvp-comment-267-4
δέξεσθαι
421
mvp-comment-267-5
It seems, then, a reasonable inference that here, where the reference is to future time, he would have written
δέξεσθαι
422
δέξασθαι
423
mvp-comment-267-6
444 ff. Join
θανὼν ἄτιμος
424
mvp-comment-267-7
ἐμασχαλίσθη
425
mvp-comment-267-8
Two different motives are assigned by the Greek commentators; viz.:—(1) the desire to render the dead incapable of wreaking vengeance (
ὥσπερ τὴν δύναμιν ἐκείνων ἀφαιρούμενοι
): (2) the desire to make an atonement (
ἐξιλάσασθαι τὴν δολοφονίαν—ἀφοσιοῦσθαι τὸν φόνον
). There can be little doubt that the first of these motives was the primitive origin of the custom. If the second was afterwards blended with it, the idea may have been that of offering the severed portions to the gods below,—as a victim was devoted to death by cutting off a lock of hair (
Eur.
Alc. 75
). Apollonius Rhodius seems to present the practice in this light (4. 477): Jason, having slain a foe,
ἐξάργματα τάμνε θανόντος
. Cp.
Etym. Magn.:
ἀπάργματα λέγεται τὰ ὑπὸ τῶν τραγῳδῶν λεγόμενα μασχαλίσματα
.
mvp-comment-267-9
κἀπὶ λουτροῖσιν
426
mvp-comment-267-10
ἐξέμαξ ν
427
mvp-comment-267-11
ἆρα μὴ
428
mvp-comment-268-1
οὐκ ἔστιν
429
mvp-comment-268-2
ταῦτα μὲν μέθες· σὺ δὲ
430
mvp-comment-269-1
βοστρύχων ἄκρας φόβας
431
mvp-comment-269-2
κἀμοῦ ταλαίνης
432
mvp-comment-270-1
†ἀλιπαρῆ
433
λιπαρῆ
434
mvp-comment-270-2
We come, therefore, to a dilemma. (1) The words
τήνδ’ ἀλιπαρῆ τρίχα
may conceal some corruption:
τήνδ’
ought possibly to be
τήνδε τ’
435
ἀλίπαρον
436
mvp-comment-270-3
(2) Or else, if the text be sound,
ἀλιπαρῆ
may mean
οὐ λιπαράν
. There is no doubt that
λιπ
, ‘fat,’ is the root both of
λι^παρός
, ‘shining,’ and of
λι—παρής
, ‘sticking’; cp.
Plat.
Crat. 427 B
τὸ λιπαρὸν καὶ τὸ κολλῶδες
(
Curt.
Etym. § 340
). Similarly
γλίσχρος
, ‘sticky,’ came to mean ‘importunate.’ It is barely possible that, in coining a new negative compound, the poet may have transferred the sense of
λιπαρός
to
λιπαρής
: but it seems improbable.
mvp-comment-271-1
ζῶμα
437
mvp-comment-271-2
χλιδαῖς
438
mvp-comment-272-1
προσπίτνουσα
439
αὐτὸν
440
mvp-comment-273-1
ἐξ ὑπερτέρας χερός
441
mvp-comment-273-2
ζῶντ’
442
mvp-comment-274-1
ἀφνεωτέραις
443
mvp-comment-274-2
στέφωμεν
444
mvp-comment-274-3
δωρούμεθα
445
mvp-comment-275-1
οἶμαι μὲν οὖν
446
mvp-comment-275-2
If
μέλον
447
μέλειν
448
μέλον
449
mvp-comment-276-1
σοί
450
mvp-comment-277-1
βροτῶν
451
mvp-comment-278-1
πρὸς εὐσέβειαν
452
mvp-comment-279-1
δράσω
453
mvp-comment-279-2
τὸ γὰρ δίκαιον
454
mvp-comment-279-3
(1)
τὸ δίκαιον
is an acc. of general reference, and
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
is impersonal. ‘With regard to what is (clearly) right, it is unreasonable for two persons to dispute; rather both should hasten on the doing (of it).’ With
ἀλλ’ ἐπισπεύδειν
we supply the notion
δεῖ
from the negative
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
(as from
οὐκ ἔξεστι
in
O. C. 1402
ff.; cp.
O. T. 817
ff.). For the form of the sentence, cp.
H. 7. 3. 7
τοὺς περὶ Ἀρχίαν...οὐ ψῆφον ἀνεμείνατε, ἀλλὰ ὁπότε πρῶτον ἐδυνάσθητε ἐτιμωρήσασθε
. So here the acc.
τὸ δίκαιον
, which represents the object of
δρᾶν
, is separated from it by the parenthesis
οὐκ
ἔχει λόγον δυοῖν ἐρίζειν
. (The first scholium gives substantially this view:
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον φιλονεικεῖν περὶ τοῦ δικαίου, ὥστε περὶ αὐτοῦ δύο ὄντας ἐρίζειν
.)
mvp-comment-279-4
(2) Or
τὸ δίκαιον
might be nom.: ‘that which is clearly right does not
afford any ground (
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
) for two persons to dispute,’ etc. So the second schol.:
ἢ τὸ οὐκ ἔχει λόγον ἀντὶ τοῦ οὐ παρέχει πρόφασιν
. So far as the verb
ἔχει
is concerned, this sense is quite admissible: cp.
Thuc. 2. 41
οὔτε τῷ πολεμίῳ ἐπελθόντι ἀγανάκτησιν ἔχει
(
ἡ πόλις
). The objection is that the phrases
ἔχειν λόγον, οὐκ ἔχειν λόγον
, which are very common, regularly mean, ‘to be reasonable,’ ‘to be unreasonable.’ This is so both in the personal and in the impersonal constr.; as Plat.
Phaedop. 62 D
τὸ γὰρ μὴ ἀγανακτεῖν...οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
:
Dem. or. 36 § 54
πῶς ἔχει λόγον σὲ...δίκην ἀξιοῦν λαμβάνειν
; The supposed sense, ‘not to
afford a reason,’ is unexampled.
mvp-comment-279-5
δυοῖν
455
mvp-comment-280-1
παρ’ ὑμῶν
456
mvp-comment-281-1
πικρὰν
457
δοκῶ με … τολμήσειν
458
ἔτι
459
mvp-comment-282-1
εἰ μὴ )γὼ
460
mvp-comment-282-2
γνώμας λειπομένα
461
mvp-comment-283-1
ἁ πρόμαντις Δίκα
462
mvp-comment-283-2
δίκαια φερομένα χεροῖν κράτη
463
mvp-comment-284-1
μέτεισιν
464
mvp-comment-284-2
οὐ μακροῦ χρόνου
465
mvp-comment-285-1
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
466
κλύουσαν
467
mvp-comment-285-2
ἁδυπνόων … ὀνειράτων
468
mvp-comment-286-1
ἀμναστεῖ γ’ ὁ φύσας ς’
469
mvp-comment-287-1
χαλκόπλακτος
470
mvp-comment-287-2
γένυς
471
mvp-comment-287-3
The very axe (
φόνιος πέλεκυς
, 99) with which the blow was dealt is imagined as nourishing a grudge against the murderers who had set it such a task. Such a personification recalls that practice of Athenian law by which inanimate objects which had caused death were brought to a formal trial in the court called
τὸ ἐπὶ Πρυτανείῳ
, and, after sentence, cast beyond the boundaries, in the presence of the Archon Basileus and the sacrificial officers of the tribes (
φυλο‐
βασιλεῖς
). Aeschin. or. 3 § 244
τὰ μὲν ξύλα καὶ τοὺς λίθους καὶ τὸν σίδηρον, τὰ ἄφωνα καὶ ἀγνώμονα, ἐάν τῳ ἐμπεσόντα ἀποκτείνῃ, ὑπερορίζομεν
. (Cp.
Dem. or. 23 § 76
.) A like conception was implied in the English law (repealed in 1846) of ‘deodands’ (Deo danda),
i.e., personal chattels (whether animals or things) which, having caused the death of a human being, were forfeited to the Crown for pious uses.
mvp-comment-288-1
ἐν αἰκίαις
472
mvp-comment-289-1
καὶ πολύπους καὶ πολύχειρ
473
mvp-comment-290-1
λόχοις
474
mvp-comment-290-2
χαλκόπους
475
mvp-comment-291-1
ἄλεκτρ’ ἄνυμφα
476
mvp-comment-291-2
γάμων ἁμιλλήμαθ’
477
mvp-comment-291-3
ἐπέβα
478
mvp-comment-292-1
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι … συνδρῶσιν
479
mvp-comment-292-2
Verses 495—497 (
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι...τέρας
) answer metrically to vv. 479—481
ὕπεστί μοι...ὀνειράτων
, where the text is certain, save for the doubt whether
θράσος
or
θάρσος
should stand in 479. Here we must first decide two points.
mvp-comment-292-3
(1) Are the words
πρὸ τῶνδε
480
mvp-comment-292-4
(2) Could
ἔχει με, μήποτε τέρας πελᾶν
(etc.) mean, ‘
the belief possesses me, that’ etc.? Surely not. No real parallel for so strange a phrase has been produced. It is irrelevant to quote those impersonal verbs which directly express the
occurrence of a thought to the mind; as
Xen.
An. 6. 1. 17
εἰσῄει αὐτοὺς ὅπως ἂν καὶ ἔχοντές τι οἴκαδε ἀφίκοιντο
(‘the thought came to them, how they might,’ etc.):
Thuc. 6. 78.
§ 1
εἰ δέ τῳ ἄρα παρέστηκε, τὸν μὲν Συρακόσιον...πολέμιον εἶναι κ.τ.λ.
Either, then, the subject to
ἔχει
has dropped out, or the words
μ’ ἔχει
conceal a corruption.
mvp-comment-292-5
The following remedies are possible: I incline to the first, as involving least change. (1) Reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
, we may read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοί μ’ ἔχει
|
<θάρσος τι>, μήποθ’ ἡμῖν
etc. (It may be remarked that
τι
is in harmony with the tone of
ὕπεστί μοι
in 479.) Another available word is
ξύννοια
(cp.
Ant. 279
). (2) Or, reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θάρσος
, we could read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι θάρσος ἴσχει με
. On either view, the
υ
of
ἁδυπνόων
in 480 is long (as several critics have assumed). It should be noted that (1) involves a different constitution of the verses: see p. lxxxii.
mvp-comment-292-6
In those MSS. which have
μή ποτε μή ποθ’ ἡμῖν
481
mvp-comment-293-1
ἀψεγές
482
ἀψεφές
483
mvp-comment-293-2
πελᾶν
484
mvp-comment-294-1
τοῖς δρῶσι
485
τοῖς συνδρῶσιν
486
mvp-comment-295-1
μαντεῖαι βροτῶν
487
mvp-comment-296-1
εὖ κατασχήσει
488
mvp-comment-297-1
ἱππεία
489
mvp-comment-297-2
Oenomaüs, king of Pisa in Elis, had promised the hand of his daughter Hippodameia to the suitor who should defeat him in a chariot-race; the penalty of failure being death. The young Pelops, son of Tantalus, offered himself as a competitor. Myrtilus, the charioteer of Oenomaüs, was persuaded (either by Hippodameia or by Pelops) to betray his master. He did so by leaving out one or both of the linch-pins by which the naves of the chariot-wheels were secured to the axles.
Tzetzes on Lycophron 156
ταῖς χοινίκισι
(=
πλήμναις
, the naves)
τῶν τροχῶν οὐκ ἐμβαλὼν τοὺς ἥλους
. According to another story, he substituted a linch-pin of wax for a real one (
schol. Apoll. Rh. 752
ἐμβαλόντα κήρινον ἔμβολον ἐπὶ τοῦ ἀκραξονίου
). So Pelops won the race, and the bride. But Oenomaüs was soon avenged on the traitor; for Myrtilus insulted Hippodameia, and was thrown into the sea by Pelops; upon whose house he invoked a curse, as he sank.
mvp-comment-297-3
Euripides, too, (
Or. 990
ff.,
Helen. 386 f.) refers to this chariot-race as the event with which the troubles of the Pelopidae began. Apollonius Rhodius briefly describes the critical moment of the race as one of the subjects embroidered on the cloak of Jason (1. 752 ff.); there Oenomaüs was seen, ‘falling sideways, as the axle broke at the naves of the wheels,’—
ἄξονος ἐν πλήμνῃσι παρακλιδὸν ἀγνυμένοιο
|
πίπτεν
.
mvp-comment-297-4
The eastern pediment of the temple of Zeus at Olympia (
circ. 450 B.C.) was adorned with sculptures by Paeonius, representing the preparation for this contest (
Paus. 5. 10. 6
). The fragments found on the site have sufficed for a reconstruction of the group. Zeus occupied the centre; to the right of him were Pelops and Hippodameia; to the left, Oenomaüs and his wife Steropè. On each side was a chariot drawn by four horses. Myrtilus was sitting in front of his team, with his face turned away from his master.
mvp-comment-297-5
In the older and nobler form of the myth, Pelops won, not by a fraud, but by the grace of Poseidon, who gave him winged horses (Pindar
O. 1. 87
ἔδωκεν δίφρον τε χούσεον πτεροῖσίν τ’ ἀκάμαντας ἵππους
). On the chest (
λάρναξ
) of Cypselus, seen by Pausanias in the Heraeum at Olympia (
Paus. 5. 17. 5
), Pelops was driving two winged horses.
mvp-comment-298-1
αἰανὴς
490
mvp-comment-298-2
The form
αἰανὴς
has the best authority, and some critics hold that
αἰανὸς
(Hesych.) was a Byzantine invention. But in
Aesch.
Eum. 416
,
ἡμεῖς γάρ ἐσμεν νυκτὸς αἰανῆς τέκνα
(so L, schol., and Tzetzes on Lycophron 406),
αἰανῆ
is far less suitable.
mvp-comment-299-1
εὖτε
491
mvp-comment-299-2
ὁ ποντισθεὶς Μυρτίλος
492
mvp-comment-299-3
A vase found at Capua shows Pelops and Hippodameia in a ship, from which Myrtilus is falling backwards into the water. A winged Erinys hovers in the air above, brandishing a sword over the head of Pelops (Baumeister,
Denkmäler p. 1204, referring to
Mon. Inst. x. 25).
mvp-comment-299-4
ἐκοιμάθη
493
mvp-comment-300-1
παγχρυσέων δίφρων
494
mvp-comment-301-1
πρόρριζος
495
mvp-comment-301-2
ἐκριφθείς
496
mvp-comment-302-1
ἔλειπεν
497
ἔλιπεν
498
οἴκου
499
οἴκους
500
πω
501
mvp-comment-303-1
πολύπονος
502
αἰκία
503
mvp-comment-304-1
ἀνειμένη
504
μέν
505
mvp-comment-304-2
ὡς ἔοικας
506
mvp-comment-304-3
στρέφει
507
mvp-comment-304-4
Clytaemnestra begins in the same strain as Chrysothemis, who likewise emphasised her reproof by the word
αὖ
508
mvp-comment-305-1
μή τοι θυραίαν γ’
509
mvp-comment-305-2
αἰσχύνειν φίλους
510
mvp-comment-306-1
καίτοι
511
mvp-comment-306-2
δὴ
512
πολλούς
513
mvp-comment-306-3
ἐξεῖπάς με … ὡς
514
mvp-comment-306-4
θρασεῖα
515
τραχεῖα
516
mvp-comment-306-5
ἄρχω
517
mvp-comment-307-1
ὕβριν … οὐκ ἔχω
518
κακῶς κλύουσα
519
mvp-comment-308-1
πατὴρ γάρ
520
mvp-comment-308-2
πρόσχημα
521
mvp-comment-309-1
ἡ γὰρ Δίκη
522
mvp-comment-310-1
ᾗ χρῆν σ’ ἀρήγειν
523
mvp-comment-311-1
The order of words in the MSS.,
ἐπεὶ πατὴρ οὗτος σός
, is probably right; the words would then fall from her with a certain deliberate bitterness.
Cp. 542
:
Ant. 44
ἦ γὰρ νοεῖς θάπτειν σθ’
(n.):
Ph. 101
λέγω σ’ ἐγὼ δόλῳ Φιλοκτήτην λαβεῖν
.
mvp-comment-312-1
μοῦνος
524
Ἑλλήνων
525
mvp-comment-312-2
Nauck requires
τὴν αὐτὸς αὑτοῦ
instead of
τὴν σὴν ὅμαιμον
, because Agamemnon's unique crime was the slaughter of his own child: as if the text did not convey this. Clytaemnestra means, ‘while mourning a father, you forget a sister.’
mvp-comment-312-3
532 f. The regular mode of expression would be,
οὐκ ἴσον λύπης καμὼν ἐμοί, ὁ σπείρας τῇ τικτούσῃ
. But, having written
ὅτ’ ἔσπειρε
, the poet explains
ἐμοί
by repeating the comparison in a new form,
ὥσπερ ἡ τίκτουσ’ ἐγώ
. (For
ὡς
or
ὥσπερ
after
ἴσος
, cp.
Lys. or. 19 § 36
ἡγοῦντο... τὰ ἐκεῖ...εἶναι ἴσα ὥσπερ τὰ ἐνθάδε
.) Those who reject v. 533 omit to notice that, without it, the words
οὐκ ἴσον καμὼν ἐμοί
would be unintelligible. Cp.
Aesch.
Ag. 1417
ἔθυσεν αὑτοῦ παῖδα, φιλτάτην ἐμοὶ
|
ὠδῖν’
.
mvp-comment-312-4
This assertion of the mother's superior claim is a counterpart to the doctrine of Athena in
Aesch.
Eum. 658
f.,
οὐκ ἔστι μήτηρ ἡ κεκλημένου τέκνου
|
τοκεύς, τροφὸς δὲ κύματος νεοσπόρου
. Cp. above,
Aesch. Eum. 366
n.
mvp-comment-313-1
τοῦ χάριν, τίνων
526
mvp-comment-313-2
The alternative, which most editors have preferred, is to take
τίνων
as the participle. But there is an insuperable objection to this, which seems to have escaped notice. The words,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could mean only, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
for what?’ They could not mean, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
to whom?’ The latter would be
τῷ χάριν τίνων
; See (
e.g.)
Aesch.
P. V. 985
καὶ μὴν ὀφείλων ἂν τίνοιμ’ αὐτῷ χάριν
:
Aesch.
Ag. 821
τούτων θεοῖσι χρὴ πολύμνηστον χάριν
|
τίνειν
. Hence the question,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could not possibly be answered by
Ἀργείων
. For, evidently, the latter word could not mean, (‘for a benefit conferred by) the Greeks.’ A scholiast in the Baroccian MS. (cr. n. on 545), who explains
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
by
τίνος χάριν ἀποδιδούς
, plainly meant, ‘showing gratitude for what?’—and his paraphrase was correct; only he overlooked the context.
mvp-comment-314-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ μετῆν
527
mvp-comment-315-1
ἀλλ’ ἀντ’ ἀδελφοῦ δῆτα
528
κτανὼν
529
mvp-comment-315-2
ἀντὶ ἀδελφοῦ
530
mvp-comment-315-3
τἄμ’
531
mvp-comment-316-1
παῖδες … διπλοῖ
532
mvp-comment-316-2
540 f. Nauck would prefer a single verse in place of these two, viz.
οὓς Ἰφιγενείας εἰκὸς ἦν θνῄσκειν πάρος
.
mvp-comment-317-1
ἢ
533
mvp-comment-317-2
ἢ τῶν ἐμῶν Ἅιδης
534
mvp-comment-318-1
δαίσασθαι
535
mvp-comment-318-2
The conj.
λῄσασθαι
536
mvp-comment-319-1
πανώλει
537
mvp-comment-319-2
παρεῖτο
538
mvp-comment-319-3
The sense does not absolutely require us to take
Μενέλεω δ’
539
mvp-comment-320-1
ἀβούλου
540
mvp-comment-320-2
κακοῦ γνώμην
541
mvp-comment-321-1
δοκῶ μέν
542
mvp-comment-321-2
εἰ καὶ
543
mvp-comment-322-1
εἰ φωνὴν λάβοι
544
mvp-comment-323-1
τοῖς πεπραγμένοις
545
mvp-comment-324-1
γνώμην δικαίαν σχοῦσα
546
mvp-comment-325-1
ἐρεῖς μὲν οὐχὶ
547
ἐρεῖς
548
ἐρεῖς … μ’ ὡς
549
mvp-comment-325-2
ἄρξασά τι λυπηρὸν
550
mvp-comment-325-3
τάδ’ ἐξήκους’
551
mvp-comment-326-1
τοῦ τεθνηκότος θ’ ὕπερ
552
mvp-comment-327-1
καὶ μὴν
553
mvp-comment-327-2
λόγους ἐξῆρχές με
554
mvp-comment-328-1
Clytaemnestra has argued that she was justified in slaying Agamemnon, because he had slain Iphigeneia. The topics of Electra's reply are as follows.
mvp-comment-328-2
(1) 558—562. The wife who slew her husband would be a criminal, even if the motive had been just retribution; but the real motive was her love for Aegisthus. (2) 563—576. Agamemnon was not a free agent in slaying Iphigeneia; the act was forced upon him by Artemis. (3) 577—583. Suppose, however, that he was a free agent, and wished to please his brother; still she was not justified in taking his life. (4) 584—594. And in any case her plea does not excuse her for living with the man who helped to slay her husband.—The speech then closes in a strain of reproach and defiance (595 —609).
mvp-comment-328-3
καὶ δὴ λέγω σοι
555
πατέρα
556
φὴς
557
mvp-comment-329-1
εἴτ’ οὖν … εἴτε
558
mvp-comment-329-2
λέξω
559
δείξω
560
mvp-comment-330-1
ὡς οὐ δίκῃ γ’
561
ἔσπασεν
562
πειθὼ
563
mvp-comment-331-1
κυναγὸν
564
mvp-comment-331-2
ποινὰς
565
mvp-comment-331-3
τὰ πολλὰ πνεύματ’ ἔσχ’
566
τὰ πολλὰ
567
ἔσχε
568
mvp-comment-331-4
Acc. to Aesch. (
Aesch.
Ag. 149
f.,
Aesch. Ag. 192
), the Greeks were detained by
adverse winds, blowing from the N.E. : and this seems to have been the account given in the
Cypria (
c. 776 B.C.), Proclus
Chrest. p. 455:
ἐπέσχεν αὐτοὺς τοῦ πλοῦ χειμῶνας ἐπιπέμπουσα
. But other authorities speak of a
calm. Thus
I. A. 9 ff.
οὔκουν φθόγγος γ’ οὔτ’ ὀρνίθων
|
οὔτε θαλάσσης· σιγαὶ δ’ ἀνέμων
|
τόνδε κατ’ Εὔριπον ἔχουσιν
. Schol.
Eur.
Or. 647
ἐπειράθη τῆς θεοῦ ὀργιζομένης καὶ κατεχούσης τοὺς ἀνέμους
. Tzetzes on Lycophron 183
χολωθεῖσα δ’ ἐπὶ τούτῳ ἡ θεὸς τοὺς ἀνέμους κατέσχεν
. Ovid (
Met. 13. 183
) combines both versions:
exspectata diu, nulla aut contraria classi | Flamina sunt.
mvp-comment-331-5
It has been objected that vessels provided with oars need not have been detained by a calm. But the ships of the Greek fleet were not light craft. Each carried from 50 to 120 armed men, besides
σκεύη πολεμικά
: and the warriors were also the rowers (cp.
Thuc. 1. 10
). It is intelligible, then, that they should await the aid of wind before attempting the passage of the Aegaean. We must remember, too, the strong and shifting currents in the Euripus (
στονόεντα πορθμόν
,
Soph.
Ant. 1145
:
παλιρρόχθοις ἐν Αὐλίδος τόποις
,
Aesch.
Ag. 191
).
mvp-comment-331-6
We cannot well render:—(1)‘He
suffered those tedious winds,’—supplying
ὁ πατήρ
from v. 558. Nor: (2) ‘She
directed those tedious winds at Aulis,’—a version which would at least require
ἐπ’ Αὐλίδι
. Cp.
Ph. 1119
ἔχε
|
δύσποτμον ἀρὰν ἐπ’ ἄλλοις
.
mvp-comment-331-7
The conjecture
πλοῖα
569
mvp-comment-331-8
Αὐλίδι
570
mvp-comment-332-1
ἢ )γὼ φράσω
571
κείνης
572
mvp-comment-333-1
ὡς ἐγὼ κλύω
573
mvp-comment-333-2
θεᾶς … κατ’ ἄλσος
574
mvp-comment-333-3
παίζων
575
mvp-comment-333-4
ποδοῖν
576
mvp-comment-334-1
ἔλαφον
577
mvp-comment-334-2
στικτὸν
578
mvp-comment-334-3
κεράστην
579
mvp-comment-334-4
οὗ κατὰ σφαγὰς
580
mvp-comment-335-1
ἐκκομπάσας ἔπος τι τυγχάνει
581
βαλών
582
mvp-comment-335-2
This is the reason against taking
τυγχάνει
with
βαλών
, as=‘he shoots and hits’; cp.
Il. 15. 581
θηρητὴρ ἐτύχησε βαλών
:
Her. 3. 35
εἰ...τοῦ παιδὸς...βαλὼν τύχοιμι
. The vaunt must then
precede the hit.
mvp-comment-335-3
Others take
βαλὼν
583
ἔπος
584
mvp-comment-335-4
Monk, with Musgrave, took
σφαγὰς
585
mvp-comment-336-1
ἐκ τοῦδε
586
mvp-comment-336-2
μηνίσασα
587
mvp-comment-336-3
Λητῴα κόρη
588
mvp-comment-337-1
ὡς
589
ἀντίσταθμον
590
mvp-comment-337-2
ἐκθύσειε
591
mvp-comment-338-1
ὧδ’ ἦν
592
mvp-comment-338-2
τὰ … θύματ’
593
mvp-comment-338-3
λύσις
594
mvp-comment-338-4
πρὸς οἶκον
595
mvp-comment-339-1
πολλὰ
596
mvp-comment-339-2
ἀντιβὰς
597
mvp-comment-339-3
μόλις
598
mvp-comment-340-1
εἰ δ’ οὖν
599
mvp-comment-340-2
ἐρῶ γὰρ καὶ τὸ σόν
600
mvp-comment-341-1
τούτου … οὕνεκ’
601
mvp-comment-341-2
νόμῳ
602
mvp-comment-342-1
ὅρα
603
μὴ … τιθῇς
604
τίθης
605
mvp-comment-342-2
Here, either
τίθης
or
τιθῇς
would be suitable. (1) With
τίθης
:—‘See that, in making this rule, you
are not making woe for yourself.’ This means that to make the rule (as she is doing) is at once (logically) to make the woe. (2) With
τιθῇς
: —‘See
lest, in making this rule, you
make woe for yourself’:
i.e., the rule may have the woe as a consequence. The woe is a future contingency (583
εἰ δίκης γε τυγχάνοις
), against which Electra warns her. On the whole, I now prefer
τιθῇς
.
Cp. 1003
ὅρα κακῶς πράσσοντε μὴ μείζω κακὰ
|
κτησώμεθ’
: fr. 82
ἀλλ’ ὅρα μὴ κρεῖσσον ᾖ
.
mvp-comment-342-3
τιθεῖσα … νόμον
606
mvp-comment-343-1
εἰ γὰρ κτενοῦμεν
607
mvp-comment-343-2
πρώτη
608
mvp-comment-344-1
εἰσόρα
609
mvp-comment-344-2
οὐκ οὖσαν
610
mvp-comment-344-3
τίθης
611
mvp-comment-344-4
εἰ … θέλεις
612
mvp-comment-345-1
τῷ παλαμναίῳ
613
mvp-comment-345-2
πρόσθεν ἐξαπώλεσας
614
mvp-comment-346-1
παιδοποιεῖς
615
mvp-comment-346-2
Erigonè, daughter of Aegisthus and Clytaemnestra (Tzetzes on
Lyc. 1374
), was mentioned by the early cyclic poet Cinaethon (
Paus. 2. 18. 6
), and was the theme of Sophocles in his
Ἠριγόνη
. Hyginus (
Hyg.
Fab. 122
) notices a son of Aegisthus named Aletes, who gives his name to a play by Sophocles, but does not record the mother: see p. xliii note 4.
mvp-comment-346-3
εὐσεβεῖς
616
mvp-comment-346-4
κἀξ εὐσεβῶν
617
mvp-comment-346-5
By
τοὺς...πρόσθεν εὐσεβεῖς
Electra means Orestes and herself. Both are ‘cast out’ of their just rights. Cp.
O.T. 611
φίλον ...ἐσθλὸν ἐκβαλεῖν
.
Eur.
El. 62
τεκοῦσα δ’ ἄλλους παῖδας Αἰγίσθῳ πάρα
|
πάρεργ’ Ὀρέστην κἀμὲ ποιεῖται δόμων.
mvp-comment-346-6
βλαστόντας
618
mvp-comment-346-7
ἐκβαλοῦσ’ ἔχεις
619
mvp-comment-347-1
πῶς ταῦτ’ ἐπαινέσαιμ’ ἄν
620
mvp-comment-347-2
ἢ
621
ἦ
622
καὶ τοῦτ’
623
ἄποινα
624
mvp-comment-348-1
αἰσχρῶς δ’
625
δ’
626
mvp-comment-348-2
ἐάν περ καὶ λέγῃς
627
mvp-comment-348-3
ἐχθροῖς γαμεῖσθαι
628
mvp-comment-348-4
These two verses, though not indispensable, seem genuine. Were they omitted, the transition from 592 to 595 would be somewhat abrupt.
mvp-comment-349-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ γὰρ
629
mvp-comment-349-2
πᾶσαν ἵης γλῶσσαν
630
mvp-comment-350-1
κακοστομοῦμεν
631
mvp-comment-350-2
καί σ’ ἔγωγε δεσπότιν
632
mvp-comment-350-3
εἰς ἡμᾶς
633
ἣ
634
mvp-comment-351-1
βίον μοχθηρόν
635
mvp-comment-351-2
ἔκ τε σοῦ
636
κακοῖς … ξυνοῦσα
637
mvp-comment-351-3
συννόμου
638
mvp-comment-352-1
ὁ δ’ ἄλλος
639
mvp-comment-352-2
χεῖρα σὴν
640
mvp-comment-352-3
τρίβει βίον
641
mvp-comment-352-4
603 The reason for writing
δή με σοὶ
642
δή μέ σοι
643
mvp-comment-352-5
μιάστορα
644
mvp-comment-353-1
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκα
645
mvp-comment-354-1
εἰς ἅπαντας
646
mvp-comment-354-2
χρῇς
647
mvp-comment-354-3
στόμαργον
648
mvp-comment-355-1
τῶνδε τῶν ἔ|ργων ἴδρις
649
mvp-comment-355-2
σχεδόν τι
650
mvp-comment-355-3
οὐ καταισχύνω
651
mvp-comment-356-1
ὁρῶ μένος πνέουσαν
652
μένος πνέουσαν
653
mvp-comment-356-2
σὺν δίκῃ ξύνεστι
654
mvp-comment-356-3
Other interpretations are:—(1) ‘I see that Electra is wroth; but as to whether she is in the right, I see no concern (anywhere),’—a timid way of saying that
Clytaemnestra shows no such concern. So the schol. (2) ‘I see that Clytaemnestra is angry, but not that she cares whether she is right’:—an inference from some gesture. Both these versions rely on the fact that
φροντίδος
(612) is plainly an echo of
φροντίδ’
(611). But: (
a) it does not follow that
φροντίδ’
is not
Electra's thought. (
b) It is surely clear that
πνέουσαν
must be Electra; and (
c) as in
Ant. 471
f., the second clause naturally refers to the same person.
mvp-comment-357-1
ποίας δ’ ἐμοὶ δεῖ
655
ἐμοὶ
656
μοι
657
δεῖ
658
mvp-comment-357-2
Others understand: (1) ‘If Electra has no consideration for justice, why should I have any consideration for her,—
i.e., show her any tenderness?’ Or: (2) ‘If she heeds not justice, why should I heed her?’ Neither view seems well suited to the context.
mvp-comment-358-1
καὶ ταῦτα
659
mvp-comment-358-2
τηλικοῦτος
660
mvp-comment-358-3
ἆρα
661
mvp-comment-358-4
χωρεῖν ἂν
662
εἰς πᾶν ἔργον
663
mvp-comment-359-1
εὖ νυν ἐπίστω
664
mvp-comment-359-2
ἔξωρα
665
mvp-comment-359-3
προσεικότα
666
mvp-comment-360-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
667
mvp-comment-360-2
ἡ … ἐκ σοῦ δυσμένεια
668
mvp-comment-360-3
ἐξαναγκάζει
669
αἰσχροῖς
670
mvp-comment-360-4
622 f. The word
θρέμμα
671
mvp-comment-360-5
ἦ σ’ ἐγὼ
672
mvp-comment-361-1
νιν
673
mvp-comment-361-2
εὑρίσκεται
674
mvp-comment-361-3
Cp. Milton,
Apology for Smectymnuus (in his
Prose Works, ed. Symmons, vol. I. p. 236): ‘I might also tell them [the prelates], what Electra in Sophocles, a wise virgin, answered her wicked mother, who thought herself too violently reproved by her the daughter: ‘'
Tis you that say it,
not I; you do the deeds, |
And your ungodly deeds find me the words.’’
mvp-comment-362-1
οὐ μὰ
675
mvp-comment-362-2
δέσποιναν
676
mvp-comment-362-3
Ἄρτεμιν
677
mvp-comment-362-4
θράσους τοῦδ’ οὐκ ἀλύξεις
678
μόλῃ
679
mvp-comment-363-1
ὁρᾷς
680
mvp-comment-363-2
ἐκφέρει
681
mvp-comment-363-3
The
v. l.
παρεῖσα
682
mvp-comment-364-1
οὐδὲ
683
mvp-comment-364-2
ὑπ’ εὐφήμου βοῆς
684
mvp-comment-364-3
ἐπειδὴ σοί γ’
685
mvp-comment-364-4
πᾶν λέγειν
686
mvp-comment-365-1
κελεύω
687
mvp-comment-365-2
τοὐμὸν στόμ’
688
mvp-comment-365-3
634 f. An altar, and probably an image, of Apollo stand before the palace. The attendant of Clytaemnestra carries offerings of various fruits, which she is now commanded to
raise, as with a gesture of solemn oblation (
ἔπαιρε
689
mvp-comment-365-4
ἡ παροῦσά μοι
690
mvp-comment-365-5
θύματα … πάγκαρπα
691
mvp-comment-366-1
λυτηρίους … δειμάτων
692
mvp-comment-366-2
ἀνάσχω
693
mvp-comment-367-1
κλύοις ἂν
694
mvp-comment-367-2
προστατήριε
695
mvp-comment-368-1
κεκρυμμένην
696
mvp-comment-368-2
οὐ γὰρ ἐν φίλοις
697
mvp-comment-369-1
πρὸς φῶς
698
mvp-comment-370-1
πολυγλώσσῳ
699
mvp-comment-370-2
σπείρῃ
700
mvp-comment-370-3
ματαίαν
701
mvp-comment-371-1
ὧδ’
702
mvp-comment-372-1
γὰρ
703
mvp-comment-372-2
δισσῶν ὀνείρων
704
mvp-comment-372-3
Jacobs Fr.(
ap. Wunder) understood, ‘
two dreams,’—as if Clyt.'s vision consisted of two parts,—the return of Agamemnon, and the growth from the sceptre (417—423). This seems forced. Still less can we assume that there was some second dream which Clyt. did not relate even to the Sun-god (425).
mvp-comment-372-4
Λύκεἰ ἄναξ
705
mvp-comment-373-1
ἐσθλά … ἐχθρά
706
mvp-comment-373-2
Cp.
Aesch.
Pers. 217
, where the Chorus are advising Atossa how to propitiate the gods after her dream:
εἴ τι φλαῦρον εἶδες, αἰτοῦ τῶνδ’ ἀποτροπὴν τελεῖν
, |
τὰ δ’ ἀγάθ’ ἐκτελῆ γενέσθαι σοί τε καὶ τέκνῳ σέθεν κ.τ.λ.
mvp-comment-373-3
ἔμπαλιν μέθες
707
mvp-comment-374-1
εἴ τινες
708
mvp-comment-375-1
ἀλλ’ ὧδε
709
mvp-comment-375-2
ἀβλαβεῖ βίῳ
710
mvp-comment-376-1
δόμους
711
mvp-comment-376-2
ἀμφέπειν
712
mvp-comment-376-3
φίλοισι
713
mvp-comment-377-1
εὐημεροῦσαν
714
mvp-comment-377-2
καὶ τέκνων
715
ὅσων
716
mvp-comment-377-3
We might also take
τέκνων
as standing, by attraction, for
τέκνοις
. When the antecedent is thus attracted, it usually comes after the relative (
O.C. 56); but sometimes precedes it, as in
Tr. 151
f.
τότ’ ἄν τις εἰσίδοιτο
... | ...
κακοῖσιν
(for
κακά
)
ο<*>ς ἐγὼ βαρύνομαι
. In examples of the latter kind, however, the acc. (and not, as it would be here, the dat.) is elsewhere the case attracted. In favour of taking
τέκνων
as partitive, it may be added that this suits the distinction between two groups of
τέκνα
. By
ὅσων
she means Chrysothemis, Iphianassa, and the offspring o<*> her union with Aegisthus (157; 589).
mvp-comment-377-4
ἐμοὶ … πρόσεστιν
717
mvp-comment-378-1
πᾶσιν ἡμῖν
718
mvp-comment-379-1
τὰ δ’ ἄλλα πάντα
719
mvp-comment-379-2
660 Following the directions given in vv. 39 ff., the Paedagogus now appears as a
ξένος Φωκεύς
. Cp.
O.T. 924 ff., where the messenger from Corinth presents himself to Iocasta and the Chorus.
mvp-comment-379-3
πῶς ἂν εἰδείην
720
mvp-comment-380-1
ἦ καὶ
721
mvp-comment-380-2
ἐπεικάζων κυρῶ
722
mvp-comment-380-3
πρέπ<*> γὰρ
723
mvp-comment-381-1
μάλιστα πάντων
724
mvp-comment-381-2
ἥδε σοι κείνη πάρα
725
mvp-comment-381-3
666 f. The
ὦ
726
χαῖρε
727
mvp-comment-382-1
ἐδεξάμην τὸ ῥηθέν
728
mvp-comment-382-2
Instant recognition of an utterance as well-omened was a way of appropriating the omen. The proper formula was
δέχομαι τὸν οἰωνόν
or
τὸν ὄρνιν
(
Her. 9. 91
;
Ar.
Pl. 63
). But
δέχομαι
alone was enough (
Xen.
An. 1. 8. 17
: cp.
Aesch.
Ag. 1653
δεχομένοις λέγεις θανεῖν σε
). The phrase used here recurs in
Her. 8. 114
δεξάμενος τὸ ῥηθὲν ἀπαλλάσσετο
: cp. also
Eur.
El. 622
προσηκάμην τὸ ῥηθέν
.
mvp-comment-382-3
εἰδέναι … σου
729
mvp-comment-383-1
Φανοτεὺς
730
mvp-comment-383-2
πρᾶγμα πορσύνων μέγα
731
mvp-comment-384-1
τὸ ποῖον
732
mvp-comment-385-1
ἐν βραχεῖ ξυνθεὶς
733
mvp-comment-386-1
τί φής, τί φής
734
ξεῖνε
735
mvp-comment-386-2
ταύτης
736
mvp-comment-387-1
νῦν τε καὶ πάλαι
737
mvp-comment-388-1
οὐδέν εἰμ’ ἔτι
738
mvp-comment-389-1
τὰ σαυτῆς πρᾶσς’
739
mvp-comment-389-2
διόλλυται
740