mvp-comment-66-1
ὁρᾶθ’
1
mvp-comment-67-1
αἳ τοὺς εὐνὰς ὑποκλεπτομένους
2
mvp-comment-67-2
These much-impugned words appear genuine. The murder has been prompted by the guilty love:
δόλος ἦν ὁ φράσας, ἔρος ὁ κτείνας
(197). In Electra's thought, they are inseparable. The allusion to the love
follows the reference to the murder, because she regards it as the crowning outrage (271
τὴν τελευταίαν ὕβριν
) that Clytaemnestra still lives with Aegisthus. Bloodshed was not the only sin which the Erinyes punished. They were the embodied sanctions of natural law, and every crime against the family came within their cognisance. (See
Introd. to Homer, p. 51, § 13.) Indeed, Electra herself speaks of the unhallowed union as a special provocation to those Avengers: 275 f.
ἡ δ’ ὧδε τλήμων ὥστε τῷ μιάστορι
|
ξύνεστ’, Ἐρινὺν οὔτιν’ ἐκφοβουμένη
.
mvp-comment-68-1
τείσασθε
3
mvp-comment-69-1
ἡμετέρου
4
μοι
5
mvp-comment-69-2
καί μοι
6
mvp-comment-70-1
ἄγειν
7
mvp-comment-70-2
σωκῶ
8
mvp-comment-71-1
δυστανοτάτας
9
mvp-comment-72-1
τάκεις … οἰμωγὰν
10
mvp-comment-72-2
ἀκόρεστον
11
mvp-comment-72-3
τὸν πάλαι
12
mvp-comment-72-4
πάλαι
13
ἐκ
14
mvp-comment-72-5
ἀθεώτατα
15
mvp-comment-72-6
κακᾷ … χειρὶ πρόδοτον
16
χειρὶ
17
mvp-comment-72-7
ὡς
18
mvp-comment-72-8
ὁ τάδε πορὼν
19
mvp-comment-72-9
εἴ μοι θέμις
20
mvp-comment-73-1
γενέθλα
21
mvp-comment-73-2
γενναίων
22
mvp-comment-73-3
παραμύθ‐
23
ιον
24
mvp-comment-74-1
ξυνίημι
25
mvp-comment-74-2
τάδ’
26
mvp-comment-75-1
φυγγάνει
27
mvp-comment-75-2
οὐδ’ ἐθέλω
28
mvp-comment-76-1
μὴ οὐ
29
mvp-comment-76-2
τὸν ἐμὸν … πατέρ’ ἄθλιον
30
mvp-comment-77-1
παντοίας
31
mvp-comment-77-2
Electra's lyrics contain some Doricisms (129, 146 f., etc.): but it is best to retain
φιλότητος
, with the MSS. The form in
η
was so familiar through Homer that it may have been preferred to
φιλότατος
even in lyrics.
Cp. 236
.
mvp-comment-78-1
ἀλύειν
32
mvp-comment-79-1
αἰαῖ, ἱκνοῦμαι
33
mvp-comment-80-1
τόν γ’ ἐξ Ἀΐδα … λίμνας
34
mvp-comment-80-2
παγκοίνου
35
mvp-comment-80-3
ἀνστάσεις
36
mvp-comment-81-1
οὔτε †γόοις οὔτε λιταῖσιν
37
οὔτε γόοισιν οὔτ’ εὐχαῖς
38
mvp-comment-82-1
For the repetition of
ἀλλά
39
mvp-comment-82-2
ἀπὸ τῶν μετρίων
40
mvp-comment-82-3
ἀμήχανον
41
mvp-comment-82-4
ο=ιόλλυσαι
42
mvp-comment-83-1
ἐν οἷς
43
mvp-comment-83-2
ἀνάλυσις … κακῶν
44
mvp-comment-83-3
τί μοι
45
mvp-comment-84-1
νήπιος
46
mvp-comment-84-2
γονέων
47
mvp-comment-85-1
ἐμέ γ’ … ἄραρεν
48
mvp-comment-85-2
φρένας
49
mvp-comment-86-1
αἰὲν Ἴτυν
50
mvp-comment-87-1
ὄρνις
51
mvp-comment-87-2
ἀτυζομένα
52
mvp-comment-87-3
Διὸς ἄγγελος
53
mvp-comment-88-1
Νιόβα, σὲ δ’
54
θεόν
55
mvp-comment-88-2
ἅτ’
56
mvp-comment-88-3
ἐν τάφῳ πετραίῳ
57
mvp-comment-89-1
αἰεὶ
58
mvp-comment-90-1
οὔτοι σοὶ μούνᾳ
59
mvp-comment-91-1
πρὸς ὅ τι
60
mvp-comment-91-2
τῶν ἔνδον εἶ περισσά
61
mvp-comment-92-1
οἷς
62
τῶν ἔνδον
63
mvp-comment-92-2
ὁμόθεν
64
γονᾷ ξύναιμος
65
mvp-comment-93-1
οἵα Χρ. ζώει
66
mvp-comment-93-2
Acc. to the version followed by Sophocles, Agamemnon had four daughters, Iphigeneia, Electra, Chrysothemis, Iphianassa. This was the account given in the cyclic
Κύπρια ἔπη
, as the schol. here mentions; a poem of which there is another trace in this play (566 ff.). Sophocles wrote an
Ἰφιγένεια
(
Nauck,
frag. Soph. 284—292
); but her name is not mentioned in the reference to her death below (530—594). In
Il. 9. 145
Agamemnon has three daughters, Chrysothemis, Laodicè, Iphianassa: Homer does not mention Iphigeneia. Lucretius gives the name of Iphianassa to the victim at Aulis (
1. 85
).
mvp-comment-93-3
ζώει
67
mvp-comment-93-4
καὶ Ἰφιάνασσα
68
mvp-comment-94-1
ἀχέων
69
mvp-comment-94-2
Hermann, taking
ἀχέων
70
κρυπτᾷ
71
mvp-comment-95-1
ὄλβιος, ὃν
72
mvp-comment-95-2
For the simple
ὅς
, instead of
ὅς γε
or
ὅστις
, with causal force, cp. below, 188, 261, 959;
O.T. 817.
mvp-comment-96-1
δέξεται εὐπατρίδαν
73
mvp-comment-96-2
Διὸς εὔφρονι
74
βήματι
75
mvp-comment-96-3
γᾶν
76
γᾶ
77
mvp-comment-96-4
Ὀρέσταν
78
ὃν
79
mvp-comment-97-1
ἀκάματα
80
mvp-comment-97-2
ἀνύμφευτος
81
ἄτεκνος
82
mvp-comment-97-3
οἰχνῶ
83
mvp-comment-98-1
δάκρυσι μυδαλέα
84
mvp-comment-98-2
τὸν ἀνήνυτον
85
mvp-comment-98-3
οἶτον ἔχουσα
86
mvp-comment-99-1
ὧν τ’ ἔπαθ’
87
ὧν τ’ ἐδάη
88
mvp-comment-99-2
Wecklein, reading
ἐδάην
, explains,— ‘what I have heard from him,’—viz., his promises of coming.
mvp-comment-99-3
τί γὰρ … ἀγγελίας
89
mvp-comment-99-4
ἀπατώμενον
90
τί … οὐκ
91
mvp-comment-99-5
Herwerden's
οὐχί μοι
92
οὐκ ἐμοί
93
ὁ δέ
94
mvp-comment-100-1
ποθεῖ, ποθῶν δ’
95
mvp-comment-101-1
ἔτι μέγας οὐρανῷ
96
ἐν
97
mvp-comment-102-1
τὸν ὑπεραλγῆ
98
mvp-comment-102-2
νέμουσα
99
mvp-comment-103-1
μήτε ὑπεράχθεο
100
οἷς
101
mvp-comment-104-1
εὐμαρὴς θεός
102
θεός
103
mvp-comment-105-1
οὔτε γὰρ
104
mvp-comment-105-2
Κρῖσαν
105
mvp-comment-105-3
Crisa stood about two miles W.S.W. of Delphi, on a spur of Parnassus, at the lower outlet of the gorge through which the river Pleistus issues into the plain. The
Iliad mentions ‘sacred Crisa’ (
ζαθέην
, 2. 520). But the Homeric Hymn to the Pythian Apollo is the best witness to its ancient power. There, just as here, the name
Κρῖσα
includes the land which stretches southward from the town to its harbour on the ‘wide gulf’ (vv. 253— 261). We need not, then, read
Κρίσᾳ
or
Κρίσας
. Crisa was the earliest seat of trade on the western sea; Delphi, when first founded, was merely a sanctuary in its territory. Pindar recalls the old prominence of its name when he describes a Pythian victory as won
Κρισαίαις ἐνὶ πτυχαῖς
(
P. 6. 18).
mvp-comment-105-4
Cirrha, a town of much later date, was the port of Crisa on the gulf. About 585 B.C., the Delphians, aided by Cleisthenes of Sicyon and his allies, succeeded, after a long struggle, in humbling Crisa and destroying Cirrha. The Crisaean plain was then devoted to Apollo, whose domain was thus extended from his temple to the coast. When Sophocles wrote, that ground was still a
βούνομος ἀκτή
, inviolable by plough or spade. It was not till the middle of the next century that the alleged encroachments of Amphissa on the
ἱερὰ χώρα
gave a pretext for war to the Amphictyons (355 B.C.).
mvp-comment-105-5
Ulrichs (
Reisen in Griechenland) was the first to place the relations of Crisa and Cirrha in a clear light. Strabo correctly describes the site of Cirrha, but erroneously places Crisa to the east of it (9. p. 418).
mvp-comment-106-1
βούνομον
106
βουνόμον
107
mvp-comment-106-2
βούνομον ἀκτὰν
108
Κρῖσαν
109
mvp-comment-107-1
ἀπερίτροπος
110
mvp-comment-108-1
παρὰ τὸν Ἀχέροντα
111
ἀνάσσων
112
θεὸς
113
mvp-comment-109-1
μὲν
114
mvp-comment-109-2
ὁ πολὺς … βίοτος
115
mvp-comment-109-3
ἀνέλπιστος
116
mvp-comment-109-4
187 *
τεκέων
. I am now satisfied that this is a true correction of
τοκέων
117
ἅτις
118
τοκέων
119
mvp-comment-110-1
ἁπερεί
120
mvp-comment-110-2
ἔποικος
121
mvp-comment-111-1
οἰκονομῶ θαλάμους
122
mvp-comment-112-1
ἀεικεῖ σὺν στολᾷ
123
mvp-comment-113-1
κεναῖς δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
124
ἀμφίσταμαι
125
mvp-comment-113-2
Hartung, reading
κενὰ δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
, takes the sense to be that she stands ‘hungry’ by the tables at which the others feast. But
κενή
as=
νῆστις
would be neither usual nor elegant.
mvp-comment-114-1
Hitherto the Chorus have offered consolation or counsel. At v. 213 they return to that strain. But here, moved by Electra's misery, they join with her in bewailing its cause.
mvp-comment-114-2
οἰκτρὰ μὲν … πλαγά
126
κοίταις
127
οἰκτρὰ … αὐδὰ
128
mvp-comment-114-3
Sophocles, who follows the Homeric story as to the banquet, could not but remember the
οἰκτροτάτην ὄπα
of the dying Cassandra. And this might naturally suggest to him that other
οἰκτρὰ αὐδή
which she had uttered at an earlier moment, immediately after Agamemnon's return,—her presage of his fate, and her own:
Aesch.
Ag. 1072
—1314.
mvp-comment-114-4
The sense then is:—‘There was a voice of lamentation at the return from Troy’; alluding especially to Cassandra's laments, but also, perhaps, to forebodings in the mouth of the people at Mycenae. ‘And there was a voice of lamentation
ἐν κοίταις πατρῴαις
, when thy father lay on the couch at the fatal banquet.’ The ‘voice’ at the banquet is, first, that of the dying Agamemnon; but Sophocles may have thought also of Cassandra's death-cry, which was sounding in the king's ears as he fell.—For other interpretations, see Appendix.
mvp-comment-114-5
νόστοις
129
ἐν
130
mvp-comment-114-6
κοίταις
131
mvp-comment-114-7
ὅτε οἱ
132
σοι
133
ἀνταία
134
mvp-comment-114-8
γενύων
135
mvp-comment-115-1
δόλος … ἔρος
136
mvp-comment-116-1
δεινὰν δεινῶς
137
δεινὰν … μορφάν
138
mvp-comment-116-2
εἴτ’ οὖν … εἴτε
139
βροτῶν
140
mvp-comment-117-1
πλέον … ἐχθίστα
141
mvp-comment-117-2
δὴ
142
mvp-comment-118-1
νὺξ
143
mvp-comment-118-2
δείπνων
144
mvp-comment-119-1
ἄχθη
145
τοῖς
146
θανάτους
147
mvp-comment-119-2
διδύμαιν χειροῖν
148
διδύμοιν
149
mvp-comment-120-1
εἷλον … πρόδοτον
150
mvp-comment-121-1
οἷς
151
mvp-comment-121-2
Ὀλύμπιος
152
mvp-comment-122-1
ποίνιμα
153
mvp-comment-123-1
ἀγλαΐας
154
mvp-comment-123-2
ἀποναίατο
155
mvp-comment-124-1
πόρσω
156
mvp-comment-125-1
γνώμαν ἴσχεις
157
mvp-comment-125-2
ἐξ οἵων
158
mvp-comment-125-3
τὰ παρόντ’
159
mvp-comment-125-4
οἰκείας
160
mvp-comment-126-1
πολύ … τι κακῶν
161
mvp-comment-126-2
ὑπερεκτήσω
162
mvp-comment-127-1
τὰ δὲ
163
οὐκ ἐριστὰ τοῖς δυνατοῖς
164
πλάθειν
165
mvp-comment-127-2
ἐριστά
166
mvp-comment-127-3
πλάθειν
167
mvp-comment-128-1
δεινοῖς ἠναγκάσθην
168
mvp-comment-129-1
ὀργά
169
ἔξοιδ’
170
mvp-comment-130-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
171
mvp-comment-130-2
ἐν … δεινοῖς
172
mvp-comment-130-3
σχήσω
173
mvp-comment-130-4
ταύτας ἄτας
174
mvp-comment-131-1
ὄφρα
175
mvp-comment-131-2
βίος ἔχῃ με
176
σχήσω
177
mvp-comment-132-1
τίνι γάρ … τίνι φρονοῦντι καίρια
178
ἀκούσαιμ’ ἂν πρόσφορον ἔπος
179
τίνι
180
πρόσφορον
181
mvp-comment-132-2
Other explanations are:—(1) Taking the dative with
πρόσφορον
:—‘To what person who feels aright would that word be suitable which I should hear (=which would be said of me)?’ That is: Should I not deserve to incur a censure from which every right-minded person would shrink? Should I not deserve to be called
δυσσεβής
? This seems forced; and it does not well suit
ἔπος
. (2) Taking the dative with
ἀκούσαιμι
:—‘At whose mouth (=
from whom), that thinks aright, could I hear a suitable word of comfort?’ But such a dative seems impossible. In
Il. 16. 515
δύνασαι δὲ σὺ πάντοσ’ ἀκούειν
|
ἀνέρι κηδομένῳ
, the dat. is one of interest, denoting the person whose prayer is heard (‘
for him’); cp.
Il. 5. 115
κλῦθί μοι
: 24. 335
ἔκλυες ᾧ κ’ ἐθέλῃσθα
.
mvp-comment-133-1
ἄνετε
182
mvp-comment-133-2
ἄλυτα
183
mvp-comment-133-3
κεκλήσεται
184
mvp-comment-133-4
231 f. For
ἐκ
185
mvp-comment-133-5
ἀνάριθμος
186
θρήνων
187
mvp-comment-134-1
ἀλλ’ οὖν
188
γε
189
εὐνοίᾳ
190
mvp-comment-135-1
μάτηρ ὡσεί τις
191
mvp-comment-136-1
μὴ τίκτειν
192
mvp-comment-136-2
ἄταν ἄταις
193
mvp-comment-137-1
καὶ τί μέτρον
194
κακότατος
195
mvp-comment-137-2
φέρε
196
mvp-comment-137-3
ἐπὶ τοῖς φθ.
197
mvp-comment-138-1
ἔβλαστ’
198
mvp-comment-139-1
τούτοις
199
mvp-comment-140-1
εἴ τῳ πρόσκειμαι χρηστῷ
200
mvp-comment-141-1
ξυνναίοιμ’
201
mvp-comment-141-2
εὔκηλος
202
mvp-comment-141-3
γονέων
203
ἐκτίμους
204
mvp-comment-141-4
ἐκτίμους ἵσχουσα
205
mvp-comment-141-5
πτέρυγας … γόων
206
mvp-comment-141-6
ὀξυτόνων
207
mvp-comment-142-1
εἰ γὰρ
208
mvp-comment-142-2
γᾶ
209
mvp-comment-142-3
οὐδὲν
210
ὢν
211
εἰ
212
mvp-comment-142-4
Electra is contrasting her father, whose earthly life has been cut short, with his murderers, who survive. But she believes that his spirit lives in the world below, and will be active in aiding the vengeance (453 ff.).
mvp-comment-142-5
πάλιν
213
mvp-comment-142-6
ἀντιφόνους δίκας
214
mvp-comment-143-1
ἔρροι τ’
215
mvp-comment-143-2
αἰδὼς
216
εὐσέβεια
217
mvp-comment-144-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
218
mvp-comment-144-2
καὶ
219
τὸ σὸν … καὶ τοὐμὸν
220
mvp-comment-145-1
νίκα
221
mvp-comment-145-2
ἅμα
222
mvp-comment-146-1
πολλοῖσι θρήνοις
223
mvp-comment-147-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
224
mvp-comment-148-1
ἥτις εὐγενὴς γυνή
225
mvp-comment-149-1
πατρῷα … πήματα
226
mvp-comment-150-1
κατ’ εὐφρόνην
227
mvp-comment-150-2
θάλλοντα
228
mvp-comment-151-1
ᾗ
229
mvp-comment-151-2
πρῶτα μὲν … εἶτα … ἔπειτα
230
ᾗ
231
mvp-comment-151-3
τὰ μητρὸς
232
mvp-comment-151-4
ἔχθιστα συμβέβηκεν
233
mvp-comment-152-1
κἀκ τῶνδ’ ἄρχομαι
234
mvp-comment-153-1
λαβεῖν … τὸ τητᾶσθαι
235
mvp-comment-154-1
ποίας
236
δοκεῖς
237
mvp-comment-155-1
ἴδω
238
εἰσίδω δ’
239
ἴδω δὲ
240
mvp-comment-155-2
μὲν
241
mvp-comment-156-1
ἐσθήματα
242
mvp-comment-156-2
ἐκείνῳ
243
mvp-comment-156-3
παρεστίους … λοιβάς
244
ἔνθ’ ἐκεῖνον ὤλεσεν
245
mvp-comment-156-4
Acc. to
Homer. Hymn. 29. 4 ff., feasts began and ended with libations to Hestia:
οὐ γὰρ ἄτερ σοῦ
|
εἰλαπίναι θνητοῖσιν, ἵν’ οὐ πρώτῃ πυμάτῃ τε
|
Ἱστίῃ ἀρχόμενος σπένδει μελιηδέα οἶνον
. Soph. fr. 658
<*> πρῷρα λοιβῆς Ἑστία
. Other divinities, including Zeus
σωτήρ
, were similarly honoured; then the paean was sung, and the
πότος
began ( Plat.
Symp.p. 176 A).
mvp-comment-157-1
τούτων
246
mvp-comment-158-1
αὐτοέντην
247
mvp-comment-158-2
Brunck first adopted
αὐτοέντην
248
αὐτοφόντην
249
mvp-comment-158-3
ἡμὶν
250
mvp-comment-159-1
ταλαίνῃ
251
mvp-comment-160-1
ταύτην … τῷδε
252
mvp-comment-161-1
μιάστορι
253
Ἐρινὺν
254
mvp-comment-162-1
ἐγγελῶσα τοῖς ποιουμένοις
255
mvp-comment-163-1
εὑροῦς’
256
τότε
257
mvp-comment-163-2
The conjecture
φρουροῦς’
258
τηροῦς’
259
mvp-comment-164-1
χοροὺς ἵστησι
260
mvp-comment-164-2
μηλοσφαγεῖ … ἱερὰ
261
mvp-comment-164-3
ἔμμην’ ἱερά
262
mvp-comment-164-4
τοῖς σωτηρίοις
263
mvp-comment-164-5
Argive tradition placed Agamemnon's death on the 13th of Gamelion (about the end of January). So said ‘the Argive historians’ (
οἱ Ἀργολικοὶ συγγραφεῖς
),— according to an Argive writer named Deinias, who lived about 225 B.C. (Schol. here: Müller,
Frag. Hist. vol. III. p. 25.) Possibly, then, the idea of Clytaemnestra's hideous festival may have been suggested to the poet by some actual commemoration of the event in Argolis. There was a cult of Agamemnon in various places,—notably in Laconia. (Cp. Roscher's
Lexicon, p. 96.)
mvp-comment-165-1
ἡ δύσμορος
264
κατὰ στέγας
265
mvp-comment-166-1
τέτηκα
266
mvp-comment-166-2
πατρὸς
267
mvp-comment-166-3
The
δαίς
is the feast which, in Homeric fashion (
Il. 1. 467
), would follow the sacrifice (281). Acc. to Eustathius p. 1507. 61 (on
Hom.
Od. 4. 524
ff.),
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαὶς
(or
τράπεζα
) was a proverb
ἐπὶ τῶν ἐπ’ ὀλέθρῳ εὐωχουμένων
. The poet may mean that Clytaemnestra called the festival
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαίς
, in direct allusion to
δεῖπνα ἄρρητα
(203): and this would give a special point to
ἐγγελῶσα
(277). Cp.
Eur.
Or. 1008
τά τ’ ἐπώνυμα δεῖπνα Θυέστου
. But the words do not necessarily imply more than that she called it
Ἀγαμεμνόνεια
.
mvp-comment-167-1
αὐτὴ πρὸς αὑτήν
268
αὑτήν
269
mvp-comment-167-2
κλαῦσαι
270
mvp-comment-167-3
ἡδονὴν φέρει
271
mvp-comment-168-1
ἡ λόγοισι γενναία
272
mvp-comment-169-1
φωνοῦσα
273
mvp-comment-170-1
δύσθεον
274
mvp-comment-170-2
μίσημα
275
mvp-comment-170-3
σοὶ μόνῃ
276
mvp-comment-170-4
τέθνηκεν
277
mvp-comment-170-5
ἐν πένθει
278
mvp-comment-171-1
ἐκ γόων
279
mvp-comment-171-2
οἱ κάτω θεοί
280
mvp-comment-172-1
τάδ’
281
mvp-comment-172-2
ἥξοντ’ Ὀρέστην
282
mvp-comment-173-1
παραστᾶς’
283
mvp-comment-174-1
ἥτις
284
mvp-comment-174-2
ὑπεξέθου
285
mvp-comment-175-1
ἀλλ’ ἴσθι τοι τείσουσά γ’
286
mvp-comment-176-1
ὑλακτεῖ
287
mvp-comment-176-2
σὺν
288
mvp-comment-176-3
πέλας
289
παρών
290
mvp-comment-176-4
301 The adv.
πάντα
291
mvp-comment-176-5
ἄναλκις
292
mvp-comment-176-6
ἡ πᾶσα βλάβη
293
mvp-comment-177-1
σὺν γυναιξὶ
294
mvp-comment-177-2
τὰς μάχας
295
mvp-comment-178-1
ἐφήξειν
296
mvp-comment-179-1
μέλλων … δρᾶν τι
297
mvp-comment-179-2
τὰς οὔσας τε … καὶ τὰς ἀπούσας
298
mvp-comment-179-3
μου
299
μοι
300
mvp-comment-179-4
διέφθορεν
301
mvp-comment-180-1
σωφρονεῖν
302
εὐσεβεῖν
303
mvp-comment-180-2
ἔν τοι κακοῖς
304
mvp-comment-180-3
πολλή )στ’ ἀνάγκη
305
κἀπιτηδεύειν κακά
306
mvp-comment-180-4
I place only a comma, not a colon, after
πάρεστιν
307
mvp-comment-181-1
ὄντος … βεβῶτος
308
mvp-comment-182-1
ἦ κάρτα
309
mvp-comment-182-2
θυραῖον
310
mvp-comment-182-3
οἰχνεῖν
311
mvp-comment-182-4
ἀγροῖσι
312
mvp-comment-182-5
τυγχάνει
313
mvp-comment-183-1
ἦ κἂν … ἱκοίμην
314
ἦ τ<*>ν
315
ἦ δἂν
316
mvp-comment-183-2
ἐς λόγους τοὺς σοὺς ἱκοίμην
317
mvp-comment-184-1
ὡς νῦν
318
ὥς νυν
319
mvp-comment-184-2
ἱστόρει· τί σοι φίλον
320
τό
321
τά
322
mvp-comment-184-3
With the other punctuation,
ἱστόρει τί σοι φίλον
323
mvp-comment-185-1
καὶ δὴ
324
mvp-comment-185-2
τοῦ κασιγνήτου τί φής
325
mvp-comment-185-3
ἥξοντος
326
ἢ μέλλοντος
327
mvp-comment-186-1
φησίν γε
328
mvp-comment-186-2
ποεῖ
329
mvp-comment-187-1
καὶ μὴν ἔγωγ’
330
γε
331
mvp-comment-187-2
οὐκ ὄκνῳ
332
mvp-comment-188-1
ἀρκεῖν
333
mvp-comment-189-1
ἐπεί
334
mvp-comment-189-2
μακρὰν
335
mvp-comment-189-3
324 Here, as in 316,
νῦν
336
νυν
337
mvp-comment-189-4
δόμων
338
φέρουσαν
339
mvp-comment-190-1
ὅμαιμον
340
mvp-comment-190-2
φύσιν
341
mvp-comment-191-1
Χρυσόθεμιν
342
mvp-comment-192-1
οἷα
343
νομίζεται
344
mvp-comment-193-1
πρὸς θυρῶνος ἐξόδοις
345
φωνεῖς
346
ἐλθοῦσα
347
αὖ
348
mvp-comment-193-2
330 For the absence of caesura, cp.
Ph. 101
n.
mvp-comment-194-1
θυμῷ … χαρίζεσθαι
349
mvp-comment-195-1
καίτοι τοσοῦτόν γ’ οἶδα
350
mvp-comment-195-2
κἀμαυτήν, ὅτι
351
mvp-comment-195-3
333 f. For the repeated
ἄν
352
mvp-comment-195-4
οἶ) αὐτοῖς φρονῶ
353
mvp-comment-196-1
ὑφειμένῃ
354
πλεῖν
355
mvp-comment-196-2
For the image, cp.
Eur.
Med. 524
ἄκροισι λαίφους κρασπέδοις
(with close-reefed sails)
ὑπεκφυγεῖν
|
τὴν σὴν στόμαργον, ὦ γύναι, γλωσσαλγίαν
:
Ar.
Ran. 997
ἀλλ’ ὅπως, ὦ γεννάδα
, |
μὴ πρὸς ὀργὴν ἀντιλέξεις
, |
ἀλλὰ συστείλας, ἄκροισι
|
χρώμενος τοῖς ἱστίοις κ.τ.λ.
: and conversely
Soph.
Ant. 715
ναὸς ὅστις ἐγκρατῆ πόδα
|
τείνας ὑπείκει μηδέν
.
Ovid
Epist. 1. 8. 71
moderatius opta, | Et voti, quaeso, contrahe vela tui.
Shakesp.
Henry VI., pt. iii, act 3 sc. 3. 5
‘Now Margaret | Must strike her sail, and learn awhile to serve | Where kings command.’
mvp-comment-197-1
καὶ μὴ δοκεῖν
356
mvp-comment-198-1
τοιαῦτα δ’ ἄλλα
357
ἀλλὰ
358
ἄλλα
359
mvp-comment-199-1
καίτοι τὸ μὲν δίκαιον
360
mvp-comment-199-2
κρίνεις
361
mvp-comment-199-3
εἰ … με δεῖ
362
mvp-comment-199-4
ἐλευθέραν
363
mvp-comment-199-5
ζῆν
364
mvp-comment-199-6
πάντ’
365
mvp-comment-199-7
ἀκουστέα
366
mvp-comment-200-1
δεινόν γε
367
mvp-comment-201-1
τῆς … τικτούσης
368
mvp-comment-201-2
μέλειν
369
mvp-comment-202-1
τἀμὰ νουθετήματα
370
mvp-comment-202-2
κείνης διδακτά
371
mvp-comment-202-3
ἐκ σαυτῆς
372
mvp-comment-203-1
The text, which has been suspected (cr. n.), is sound; but the train of thought is somewhat obscured by compression.
mvp-comment-203-2
‘You forget your father, and care only for your mother. All your counsels to me come from her. Then (
ἔπειτα
),—that being so,—give up the attempt at a compromise. Make a
choice (
ἑλοῦ γε
). You can be imprudent (
φρονεῖν κακῶς
),—as you say that I am,—and loyal to your dead father. Or you can be prudent (
φρονοῦσα
), and forgetful of him,—as you actually are; you who (
ἥτις
) say, indeed, that you would show your hatred of the murderers if you could; and yet, when I
do resist them, you try to turn me from my purpose. You merely add the shame of cowardice to our woes.’
mvp-comment-203-3
ἔπειθ’
373
mvp-comment-203-4
ἑλοῦ γε
374
mvp-comment-203-5
φρονεῖν κακῶς
375
mvp-comment-203-6
Other explanations are:—(1) ‘Choose to be thought either
lost to right feeling, or, if you have such feeling, then at least
forgetful of your duty.’ (2) ‘Choose to seem either
unintelligent (if you are merely the blind instrument of our rulers); or, if you act with clear understanding (
φρονοῦσα
),—thinking to benefit me,—at least forgetful of your father.’ Both these views assume that the question is merely between two interpretations which might be placed on the present conduct of Chrysothemis. But Electra is putting the dilemma between imprudent loyalty and prudent disloyalty.
mvp-comment-204-1
τῶν φίλων
376
mvp-comment-205-1
ἥτις
377
φρονοῦσα
378
μῖσος
379
mvp-comment-206-1
πάντα
380
mvp-comment-206-2
τιμωρουμένης
381
mvp-comment-207-1
οὔτε … τε
382
mvp-comment-207-2
τήν τε δρῶσαν
383
mvp-comment-208-1
πρὸς κακοῖσι
384
mvp-comment-208-2
δειλίαν ἔχει
385
mvp-comment-209-1
ἐπεὶ
386
mvp-comment-209-2
ἢ μάθ’ ἐξ ἐμοῦ
387
mvp-comment-210-1
ἐπαρκούντως
388
mvp-comment-211-1
προσάπτειν
389
mvp-comment-211-2
εἴ τις ἔστ’ ἐκεῖ χάρις
390
mvp-comment-212-1
ἡμὶν
391
ξύνει
392
mvp-comment-213-1
τὰ σὰ … δῶῤ
393
mvp-comment-213-2
ἐφ’ οἶσι
394
mvp-comment-213-3
χλιδᾷς
395
mvp-comment-214-1
ὑπεικάθοιμι
396
mvp-comment-214-2
πλουσία
397
mvp-comment-214-3
περιρρείτω
398
mvp-comment-215-1
τοὐμὲ μὴ λυπεῖν
399
mvp-comment-215-2
Remark the resemblance to the passage where Antigone—summing up her position—compares the
moral pain of neglecting her duty with those penalties which she contemns:—
κείνοις ἂν ἤλγουν· τοῖσδε δ’ οὐκ ἀλγύνομαι
(
Ant. 468
). There, too, we have a Sophoclean triad of clauses, the third echoing the first,—as
τῆς σῆς δ’ οὐκ ἐρῶ τιμῆς τυχεῖν
here reiterates the sense of
σοὶ δὲ πλουσία... βίος
(n. on
Ant. 465
ff.).
mvp-comment-215-3
One of the scholia recognises the traditional reading, and explains it correctly: —
τοῦτο μόνον ἐμὲ βοσκέτω, τὸ μὴ λυπεῖν ἐμὲ αὐτήν, εἰ
(‘as I should do, if’)
τοῖς φονεῦσι τοῦ πατρὸς πείθεσθαι ἀναγκασθήσομαι
.—The conjectures have been numerous: see Appendix.
mvp-comment-216-1
οὐδ’ ἂν σὺ
400
mvp-comment-217-1
παῖδα
401
mvp-comment-217-2
κεκλῆσθαι
402
mvp-comment-218-1
πλείστοις
403
mvp-comment-219-1
μηδὲν
404
πρὸς ὀργὴν
405
mvp-comment-220-1
ἀμφοῖν
406
τοῖς λόγοις
407
mvp-comment-221-1
τῆσδε … αὕτη
408
πάλιν
409
mvp-comment-222-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
410
mvp-comment-222-2
πως
411
mvp-comment-222-3
μύθων
412
mvp-comment-223-1
οὐδ’
413
κοὐδ’
414
ποτέ
415
mvp-comment-224-1
ἰὸν
416
mvp-comment-224-2
σχήσει
417
mvp-comment-225-1
τὸ δεινὸν
418
mvp-comment-225-2
εἰ γὰρ τῶνδέ μοι
419
εἰ
420
mvp-comment-226-1
γὰρ
421
mvp-comment-226-2
γόων
422
λόγων
423
mvp-comment-227-1
ἐνταῦθα
424
mvp-comment-227-2
ἔνθα μή ποτε … προσόψει
425
mvp-comment-227-3
ζῶσα
426
mvp-comment-227-4
κατηρεφεῖ
427
mvp-comment-227-5
χθονὸς τῆσδ’ ἐκτὸς
428
mvp-comment-227-6
ὑμνήσεις
429
mvp-comment-228-1
πρὸς ταῦτα
430
mvp-comment-228-2
Nauck reads
κοὔ
431
καί
432
mvp-comment-228-3
ἐν καλῷ, εὔκαιρον
schol.:
H. 4. 3. 5
νομίσαντες οὐκ ἐν καλῷ εἶναι πρὸς τοὺς ὁπλίτας ἱππομαχεῖν
: so, too,
Eur.
Heracl. 971
, etc. Cp.
καλόν
(
ἐστι
)=
καίριον
in
Soph.
Ph. 1155
; and
εἰς καλόν
=
καιρίως
in
O.T. 78.
mvp-comment-229-1
ἦ ταῦτα δὴ
433
ἦ … δὴ
434
ἦ … γὰρ
435
mvp-comment-229-2
καὶ βεβούλευνται
436
mvp-comment-230-1
ἀλλ’ ἐξίκοιτο
437
mvp-comment-230-2
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκ’
438
mvp-comment-231-1
τίνα … τόνδ’
439
mvp-comment-231-2
τάλαινα
440
mvp-comment-232-1
εἴ τι τῶνδε
441
mvp-comment-233-1
ποῦ ποτ’ εἶ φρενῶν
442
mvp-comment-234-1
ὅπως
443
ὑμῶν
444
mvp-comment-234-2
προσώτατ’
445
προσωτάτω φύγω
446
mvp-comment-235-1
βίου … τοῦ παρόντος
447
mvp-comment-236-1
καλὸς γὰρ
448
mvp-comment-236-2
θαυμάσαι
449
mvp-comment-237-1
τοῖς φίλοις
450
mvp-comment-238-1
εἰκαθεῖν
451
mvp-comment-239-1
ταῦτα
452
οὐκ ἐμοὺς
453
mvp-comment-240-1
γε
454
μέντοι
455
mvp-comment-240-2
μὴ )ξ
456
mvp-comment-240-3
πεσεῖν
457
mvp-comment-240-4
399 A woman, speaking of herself in the plur., uses the masc.:
Ant. 926
παθόντες ἂν ξυγγνοῖμεν ἡμαρτηκότες
.
mvp-comment-241-1
συγγνώμην
458
mvp-comment-242-1
τἄπη
459
mvp-comment-242-2
πρὸς κακῶν
460
mvp-comment-243-1
μή πω
461
mvp-comment-244-1
οἷπερ … ὁδοῦ
462
mvp-comment-245-1
τῷ φέρεις
463
mvp-comment-245-2
ἔμπυρα
464
mvp-comment-246-1
τυμβεῦσαι χοάς
465
mvp-comment-247-1
βροτῶν
466
mvp-comment-248-1
ὃν ἔκταν’ αὐτή
467
ὅν γ’
468
mvp-comment-249-1
τῷ τοῦτ’ ἤρεσεν
469
mvp-comment-250-1
δείματος
470
mvp-comment-250-2
δοκεῖν ἐμοί
471
mvp-comment-251-1
θεοὶ πατρῷοι
472
mvp-comment-251-2
συγγένεσθέ γ’
473
mvp-comment-251-3
ἀλλὰ νῦν
474
mvp-comment-252-1
εἴποιμ’ ἂν τότε
475
mvp-comment-253-1
ἐπὶ σμικρὸν
476
ἐπὶ σμικρῶν
477
mvp-comment-253-2
φράσαι
478
mvp-comment-254-1
σμικροὶ λόγοι
479
mvp-comment-255-1
πατρὸς … δευτέραν ὁμιλίαν
480
mvp-comment-255-2
ἐφέστιον πῆξαι
481
mvp-comment-255-3
This sceptre is described in the
Iliad (2. 101 f.) as the work of Hephaestus, who gave it Zeus; Hermes transmitted it to Pelops, from whom it passed to Atreus and Agamemnon. The Homeric sceptre is often called
χρύσεον
(
Il. 2. 268
, etc.), prob. as being ornamented with gold foil, or studded with gold nails (
Il. 1. 246
χρυσείοις ἥλοισι πεπαρμένον
). Among the objects found at Mycenae are some supposed remains of such sceptres (Schliem.,
Myc. 201, etc.).
mvp-comment-255-4
οὑφόρει ποτέ
482
mvp-comment-256-1
ἔκ τε
483
ἐκ δὲ
484
mvp-comment-256-2
βρύοντα
485
mvp-comment-256-3
ᾧ … γενέσθαι
486
mvp-comment-256-4
The vision resembles that of Astyages, who dreamed that a vine sprang from his daughter Mandanè, the wife of Cambyses,
τὴν δὲ ἄμπελον ἐπισχεῖν τὴν Ἀσίην πᾶσαν
. The
ὀνειροπόλοι
explained this to mean that her son (Cyrus) should reign in his grandfather's stead. (
Her. 1. 108.
) The spreading branches figure also in the dream of Xerxes (7. 19):
ἐδόκεε...ἐστεφανῶσθαι ἐλαίης θαλλῷ, ἀπὸ δὲ τῆς ἐλαίης τοὺς κλάδους γῆν πᾶσαν ἐπισχεῖν
.
mvp-comment-256-5
In choosing the
sceptre of Agamemnon as the stock from which the wondrous growth is put forth, Sophocles may have had in mind the words of Achilles (
Il. 1. 234
ff.);
ναὶ μὰ τόδε σκῆπτρον· τὸ μὲν οὔποτε φύλλα καὶ ὄζους
|
φύσει, ἐπεὶ δὴ πρῶτα τομὴν ἐν ὄρεσσι λέλοιπεν
, |
οὐδ’ ἀναθηλήσει
.
mvp-comment-257-1
του παρόντος
487
τοῦ
488
παρόντος
489
του
490
mvp-comment-257-2
Ἡλίῳ δείκνυσι τοὖναρ
491
mvp-comment-258-1
οὐ κάτοιδα, πλὴν
492
mvp-comment-258-2
πέμπει με κείνη
493
mvp-comment-259-1
These three verses, which the MSS. give to Electra, and which several recent critics reject (cr. n.), clearly belong to Chrysothemis, and are genuine. Electra's exclamation of joy (411) caused Chrysothemis to ask if her sister had any ground for hope (412). Electra replied that, when she had heard the dream, she would say. This showed her sister that Electra relied merely on the fact that Clytaemnestra had seen
some fearful vision. Now, therefore, instead of asking for Electra's interpretation, she merely repeats her counsel (383 f.) before proceeding on her errand. The words
πρός
νυν θεῶν κ.τ.λ.
(428 ff.) show the train of her thought. To Chrysothemis, the alarm of Clytaemnestra (427) is more important than the apparition of Agamemnon. The dream is only a new reason why Electra should be cautious,—not why she should hope.
mvp-comment-259-2
The current ascription of the verses to Electra was doubtless prompted by verse 413. It was supposed that the recital of Chrysothemis must be immediately followed by the comments of Electra. But, as Hermann observed, the phrase
ἀβουλίᾳ πεσεῖν
would alone suffice to show that the verses belong to Chrysothemis (
cp. 398
). Nor could the warning,
σὺν κακῷ μέτει πάλιν
, be fitly uttered by Electra.
mvp-comment-259-3
τῶν ἐγγενῶν
494
mvp-comment-260-1
ἀβουλίᾳ
495
mvp-comment-260-2
σὺν κακῷ
496
mvp-comment-260-3
μέτει
497
mvp-comment-261-1
ἀλλ’
498
mvp-comment-261-2
ὦ φίλη
499
τούτων μὲν
500
mvp-comment-262-1
οὐ … θέμις
501
οὐδ’ ὅσιον
502
mvp-comment-262-2
ἐχθρᾶς ἀπὸ γυναικὸς
503
mvp-comment-262-3
κτερίσματ’
504
mvp-comment-262-4
λουτρὰ
505
mvp-comment-263-1
ἀλλ’ ἢ πνοαῖσιν
506
ῥοαῖσιν
507
mvp-comment-263-2
κρύψον
508
mvp-comment-263-3
νιν
509
mvp-comment-263-4
ἔνθα μή ποτ’
510
ἔνθεν
511
mvp-comment-263-5
εὐνὴν
512
mvp-comment-264-1
ἀλλ’ ὅταν θάῃν
513
mvp-comment-264-2
The conjecture
ἔστ’ ἂν
514
ὅταν
515
σῳζέσθω
516
mvp-comment-264-3
κειμήλἰ
517
mvp-comment-265-1
ἀρχὴν
518
τλημονεστάτη
519
mvp-comment-266-1
ἔβλαστε
520
mvp-comment-267-1
ὅν γ’ … τῷδ’
521
mvp-comment-267-2
ἐπέστεφε
522
mvp-comment-267-3
442 f. The position of
αὐτῇ
523
mvp-comment-267-4
δέξεσθαι
524
mvp-comment-267-5
It seems, then, a reasonable inference that here, where the reference is to future time, he would have written
δέξεσθαι
525
δέξασθαι
526
mvp-comment-267-6
444 ff. Join
θανὼν ἄτιμος
527
mvp-comment-267-7
ἐμασχαλίσθη
528
mvp-comment-267-8
Two different motives are assigned by the Greek commentators; viz.:—(1) the desire to render the dead incapable of wreaking vengeance (
ὥσπερ τὴν δύναμιν ἐκείνων ἀφαιρούμενοι
): (2) the desire to make an atonement (
ἐξιλάσασθαι τὴν δολοφονίαν—ἀφοσιοῦσθαι τὸν φόνον
). There can be little doubt that the first of these motives was the primitive origin of the custom. If the second was afterwards blended with it, the idea may have been that of offering the severed portions to the gods below,—as a victim was devoted to death by cutting off a lock of hair (
Eur.
Alc. 75
). Apollonius Rhodius seems to present the practice in this light (4. 477): Jason, having slain a foe,
ἐξάργματα τάμνε θανόντος
. Cp.
Etym. Magn.:
ἀπάργματα λέγεται τὰ ὑπὸ τῶν τραγῳδῶν λεγόμενα μασχαλίσματα
.
mvp-comment-267-9
κἀπὶ λουτροῖσιν
529
mvp-comment-267-10
ἐξέμαξ ν
530
mvp-comment-267-11
ἆρα μὴ
531
mvp-comment-268-1
οὐκ ἔστιν
532
mvp-comment-268-2
ταῦτα μὲν μέθες· σὺ δὲ
533
mvp-comment-269-1
βοστρύχων ἄκρας φόβας
534
mvp-comment-269-2
κἀμοῦ ταλαίνης
535
mvp-comment-270-1
†ἀλιπαρῆ
536
λιπαρῆ
537
mvp-comment-270-2
We come, therefore, to a dilemma. (1) The words
τήνδ’ ἀλιπαρῆ τρίχα
may conceal some corruption:
τήνδ’
ought possibly to be
τήνδε τ’
538
ἀλίπαρον
539
mvp-comment-270-3
(2) Or else, if the text be sound,
ἀλιπαρῆ
may mean
οὐ λιπαράν
. There is no doubt that
λιπ
, ‘fat,’ is the root both of
λι^παρός
, ‘shining,’ and of
λι—παρής
, ‘sticking’; cp.
Plat.
Crat. 427 B
τὸ λιπαρὸν καὶ τὸ κολλῶδες
(
Curt.
Etym. § 340
). Similarly
γλίσχρος
, ‘sticky,’ came to mean ‘importunate.’ It is barely possible that, in coining a new negative compound, the poet may have transferred the sense of
λιπαρός
to
λιπαρής
: but it seems improbable.
mvp-comment-271-1
ζῶμα
540
mvp-comment-271-2
χλιδαῖς
541
mvp-comment-272-1
προσπίτνουσα
542
αὐτὸν
543
mvp-comment-273-1
ἐξ ὑπερτέρας χερός
544
mvp-comment-273-2
ζῶντ’
545
mvp-comment-274-1
ἀφνεωτέραις
546
mvp-comment-274-2
στέφωμεν
547
mvp-comment-274-3
δωρούμεθα
548
mvp-comment-275-1
οἶμαι μὲν οὖν
549
mvp-comment-275-2
If
μέλον
550
μέλειν
551
μέλον
552
mvp-comment-276-1
σοί
553
mvp-comment-277-1
βροτῶν
554
mvp-comment-278-1
πρὸς εὐσέβειαν
555
mvp-comment-279-1
δράσω
556
mvp-comment-279-2
τὸ γὰρ δίκαιον
557
mvp-comment-279-3
(1)
τὸ δίκαιον
is an acc. of general reference, and
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
is impersonal. ‘With regard to what is (clearly) right, it is unreasonable for two persons to dispute; rather both should hasten on the doing (of it).’ With
ἀλλ’ ἐπισπεύδειν
we supply the notion
δεῖ
from the negative
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
(as from
οὐκ ἔξεστι
in
O. C. 1402
ff.; cp.
O. T. 817
ff.). For the form of the sentence, cp.
H. 7. 3. 7
τοὺς περὶ Ἀρχίαν...οὐ ψῆφον ἀνεμείνατε, ἀλλὰ ὁπότε πρῶτον ἐδυνάσθητε ἐτιμωρήσασθε
. So here the acc.
τὸ δίκαιον
, which represents the object of
δρᾶν
, is separated from it by the parenthesis
οὐκ
ἔχει λόγον δυοῖν ἐρίζειν
. (The first scholium gives substantially this view:
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον φιλονεικεῖν περὶ τοῦ δικαίου, ὥστε περὶ αὐτοῦ δύο ὄντας ἐρίζειν
.)
mvp-comment-279-4
(2) Or
τὸ δίκαιον
might be nom.: ‘that which is clearly right does not
afford any ground (
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
) for two persons to dispute,’ etc. So the second schol.:
ἢ τὸ οὐκ ἔχει λόγον ἀντὶ τοῦ οὐ παρέχει πρόφασιν
. So far as the verb
ἔχει
is concerned, this sense is quite admissible: cp.
Thuc. 2. 41
οὔτε τῷ πολεμίῳ ἐπελθόντι ἀγανάκτησιν ἔχει
(
ἡ πόλις
). The objection is that the phrases
ἔχειν λόγον, οὐκ ἔχειν λόγον
, which are very common, regularly mean, ‘to be reasonable,’ ‘to be unreasonable.’ This is so both in the personal and in the impersonal constr.; as Plat.
Phaedop. 62 D
τὸ γὰρ μὴ ἀγανακτεῖν...οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
:
Dem. or. 36 § 54
πῶς ἔχει λόγον σὲ...δίκην ἀξιοῦν λαμβάνειν
; The supposed sense, ‘not to
afford a reason,’ is unexampled.
mvp-comment-279-5
δυοῖν
558
mvp-comment-280-1
παρ’ ὑμῶν
559
mvp-comment-281-1
πικρὰν
560
δοκῶ με … τολμήσειν
561
ἔτι
562
mvp-comment-282-1
εἰ μὴ )γὼ
563
mvp-comment-282-2
γνώμας λειπομένα
564
mvp-comment-283-1
ἁ πρόμαντις Δίκα
565
mvp-comment-283-2
δίκαια φερομένα χεροῖν κράτη
566
mvp-comment-284-1
μέτεισιν
567
mvp-comment-284-2
οὐ μακροῦ χρόνου
568
mvp-comment-285-1
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
569
κλύουσαν
570
mvp-comment-285-2
ἁδυπνόων … ὀνειράτων
571
mvp-comment-286-1
ἀμναστεῖ γ’ ὁ φύσας ς’
572
mvp-comment-287-1
χαλκόπλακτος
573
mvp-comment-287-2
γένυς
574
mvp-comment-287-3
The very axe (
φόνιος πέλεκυς
, 99) with which the blow was dealt is imagined as nourishing a grudge against the murderers who had set it such a task. Such a personification recalls that practice of Athenian law by which inanimate objects which had caused death were brought to a formal trial in the court called
τὸ ἐπὶ Πρυτανείῳ
, and, after sentence, cast beyond the boundaries, in the presence of the Archon Basileus and the sacrificial officers of the tribes (
φυλο‐
βασιλεῖς
). Aeschin. or. 3 § 244
τὰ μὲν ξύλα καὶ τοὺς λίθους καὶ τὸν σίδηρον, τὰ ἄφωνα καὶ ἀγνώμονα, ἐάν τῳ ἐμπεσόντα ἀποκτείνῃ, ὑπερορίζομεν
. (Cp.
Dem. or. 23 § 76
.) A like conception was implied in the English law (repealed in 1846) of ‘deodands’ (Deo danda),
i.e., personal chattels (whether animals or things) which, having caused the death of a human being, were forfeited to the Crown for pious uses.
mvp-comment-288-1
ἐν αἰκίαις
575
mvp-comment-289-1
καὶ πολύπους καὶ πολύχειρ
576
mvp-comment-290-1
λόχοις
577
mvp-comment-290-2
χαλκόπους
578
mvp-comment-291-1
ἄλεκτρ’ ἄνυμφα
579
mvp-comment-291-2
γάμων ἁμιλλήμαθ’
580
mvp-comment-291-3
ἐπέβα
581
mvp-comment-292-1
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι … συνδρῶσιν
582
mvp-comment-292-2
Verses 495—497 (
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι...τέρας
) answer metrically to vv. 479—481
ὕπεστί μοι...ὀνειράτων
, where the text is certain, save for the doubt whether
θράσος
or
θάρσος
should stand in 479. Here we must first decide two points.
mvp-comment-292-3
(1) Are the words
πρὸ τῶνδε
583
mvp-comment-292-4
(2) Could
ἔχει με, μήποτε τέρας πελᾶν
(etc.) mean, ‘
the belief possesses me, that’ etc.? Surely not. No real parallel for so strange a phrase has been produced. It is irrelevant to quote those impersonal verbs which directly express the
occurrence of a thought to the mind; as
Xen.
An. 6. 1. 17
εἰσῄει αὐτοὺς ὅπως ἂν καὶ ἔχοντές τι οἴκαδε ἀφίκοιντο
(‘the thought came to them, how they might,’ etc.):
Thuc. 6. 78.
§ 1
εἰ δέ τῳ ἄρα παρέστηκε, τὸν μὲν Συρακόσιον...πολέμιον εἶναι κ.τ.λ.
Either, then, the subject to
ἔχει
has dropped out, or the words
μ’ ἔχει
conceal a corruption.
mvp-comment-292-5
The following remedies are possible: I incline to the first, as involving least change. (1) Reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
, we may read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοί μ’ ἔχει
|
<θάρσος τι>, μήποθ’ ἡμῖν
etc. (It may be remarked that
τι
is in harmony with the tone of
ὕπεστί μοι
in 479.) Another available word is
ξύννοια
(cp.
Ant. 279
). (2) Or, reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θάρσος
, we could read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι θάρσος ἴσχει με
. On either view, the
υ
of
ἁδυπνόων
in 480 is long (as several critics have assumed). It should be noted that (1) involves a different constitution of the verses: see p. lxxxii.
mvp-comment-292-6
In those MSS. which have
μή ποτε μή ποθ’ ἡμῖν
584
mvp-comment-293-1
ἀψεγές
585
ἀψεφές
586
mvp-comment-293-2
πελᾶν
587
mvp-comment-294-1
τοῖς δρῶσι
588
τοῖς συνδρῶσιν
589
mvp-comment-295-1
μαντεῖαι βροτῶν
590
mvp-comment-296-1
εὖ κατασχήσει
591
mvp-comment-297-1
ἱππεία
592
mvp-comment-297-2
Oenomaüs, king of Pisa in Elis, had promised the hand of his daughter Hippodameia to the suitor who should defeat him in a chariot-race; the penalty of failure being death. The young Pelops, son of Tantalus, offered himself as a competitor. Myrtilus, the charioteer of Oenomaüs, was persuaded (either by Hippodameia or by Pelops) to betray his master. He did so by leaving out one or both of the linch-pins by which the naves of the chariot-wheels were secured to the axles.
Tzetzes on Lycophron 156
ταῖς χοινίκισι
(=
πλήμναις
, the naves)
τῶν τροχῶν οὐκ ἐμβαλὼν τοὺς ἥλους
. According to another story, he substituted a linch-pin of wax for a real one (
schol. Apoll. Rh. 752
ἐμβαλόντα κήρινον ἔμβολον ἐπὶ τοῦ ἀκραξονίου
). So Pelops won the race, and the bride. But Oenomaüs was soon avenged on the traitor; for Myrtilus insulted Hippodameia, and was thrown into the sea by Pelops; upon whose house he invoked a curse, as he sank.
mvp-comment-297-3
Euripides, too, (
Or. 990
ff.,
Helen. 386 f.) refers to this chariot-race as the event with which the troubles of the Pelopidae began. Apollonius Rhodius briefly describes the critical moment of the race as one of the subjects embroidered on the cloak of Jason (1. 752 ff.); there Oenomaüs was seen, ‘falling sideways, as the axle broke at the naves of the wheels,’—
ἄξονος ἐν πλήμνῃσι παρακλιδὸν ἀγνυμένοιο
|
πίπτεν
.
mvp-comment-297-4
The eastern pediment of the temple of Zeus at Olympia (
circ. 450 B.C.) was adorned with sculptures by Paeonius, representing the preparation for this contest (
Paus. 5. 10. 6
). The fragments found on the site have sufficed for a reconstruction of the group. Zeus occupied the centre; to the right of him were Pelops and Hippodameia; to the left, Oenomaüs and his wife Steropè. On each side was a chariot drawn by four horses. Myrtilus was sitting in front of his team, with his face turned away from his master.
mvp-comment-297-5
In the older and nobler form of the myth, Pelops won, not by a fraud, but by the grace of Poseidon, who gave him winged horses (Pindar
O. 1. 87
ἔδωκεν δίφρον τε χούσεον πτεροῖσίν τ’ ἀκάμαντας ἵππους
). On the chest (
λάρναξ
) of Cypselus, seen by Pausanias in the Heraeum at Olympia (
Paus. 5. 17. 5
), Pelops was driving two winged horses.
mvp-comment-298-1
αἰανὴς
593
mvp-comment-298-2
The form
αἰανὴς
has the best authority, and some critics hold that
αἰανὸς
(Hesych.) was a Byzantine invention. But in
Aesch.
Eum. 416
,
ἡμεῖς γάρ ἐσμεν νυκτὸς αἰανῆς τέκνα
(so L, schol., and Tzetzes on Lycophron 406),
αἰανῆ
is far less suitable.
mvp-comment-299-1
εὖτε
594
mvp-comment-299-2
ὁ ποντισθεὶς Μυρτίλος
595
mvp-comment-299-3
A vase found at Capua shows Pelops and Hippodameia in a ship, from which Myrtilus is falling backwards into the water. A winged Erinys hovers in the air above, brandishing a sword over the head of Pelops (Baumeister,
Denkmäler p. 1204, referring to
Mon. Inst. x. 25).
mvp-comment-299-4
ἐκοιμάθη
596
mvp-comment-300-1
παγχρυσέων δίφρων
597
mvp-comment-301-1
πρόρριζος
598
mvp-comment-301-2
ἐκριφθείς
599
mvp-comment-302-1
ἔλειπεν
600
ἔλιπεν
601
οἴκου
602
οἴκους
603
πω
604
mvp-comment-303-1
πολύπονος
605
αἰκία
606
mvp-comment-304-1
ἀνειμένη
607
μέν
608
mvp-comment-304-2
ὡς ἔοικας
609
mvp-comment-304-3
στρέφει
610
mvp-comment-304-4
Clytaemnestra begins in the same strain as Chrysothemis, who likewise emphasised her reproof by the word
αὖ
611
mvp-comment-305-1
μή τοι θυραίαν γ’
612
mvp-comment-305-2
αἰσχύνειν φίλους
613
mvp-comment-306-1
καίτοι
614
mvp-comment-306-2
δὴ
615
πολλούς
616
mvp-comment-306-3
ἐξεῖπάς με … ὡς
617
mvp-comment-306-4
θρασεῖα
618
τραχεῖα
619
mvp-comment-306-5
ἄρχω
620
mvp-comment-307-1
ὕβριν … οὐκ ἔχω
621
κακῶς κλύουσα
622
mvp-comment-308-1
πατὴρ γάρ
623
mvp-comment-308-2
πρόσχημα
624
mvp-comment-309-1
ἡ γὰρ Δίκη
625
mvp-comment-310-1
ᾗ χρῆν σ’ ἀρήγειν
626
mvp-comment-311-1
The order of words in the MSS.,
ἐπεὶ πατὴρ οὗτος σός
, is probably right; the words would then fall from her with a certain deliberate bitterness.
Cp. 542
:
Ant. 44
ἦ γὰρ νοεῖς θάπτειν σθ’
(n.):
Ph. 101
λέγω σ’ ἐγὼ δόλῳ Φιλοκτήτην λαβεῖν
.
mvp-comment-312-1
μοῦνος
627
Ἑλλήνων
628
mvp-comment-312-2
Nauck requires
τὴν αὐτὸς αὑτοῦ
instead of
τὴν σὴν ὅμαιμον
, because Agamemnon's unique crime was the slaughter of his own child: as if the text did not convey this. Clytaemnestra means, ‘while mourning a father, you forget a sister.’
mvp-comment-312-3
532 f. The regular mode of expression would be,
οὐκ ἴσον λύπης καμὼν ἐμοί, ὁ σπείρας τῇ τικτούσῃ
. But, having written
ὅτ’ ἔσπειρε
, the poet explains
ἐμοί
by repeating the comparison in a new form,
ὥσπερ ἡ τίκτουσ’ ἐγώ
. (For
ὡς
or
ὥσπερ
after
ἴσος
, cp.
Lys. or. 19 § 36
ἡγοῦντο... τὰ ἐκεῖ...εἶναι ἴσα ὥσπερ τὰ ἐνθάδε
.) Those who reject v. 533 omit to notice that, without it, the words
οὐκ ἴσον καμὼν ἐμοί
would be unintelligible. Cp.
Aesch.
Ag. 1417
ἔθυσεν αὑτοῦ παῖδα, φιλτάτην ἐμοὶ
|
ὠδῖν’
.
mvp-comment-312-4
This assertion of the mother's superior claim is a counterpart to the doctrine of Athena in
Aesch.
Eum. 658
f.,
οὐκ ἔστι μήτηρ ἡ κεκλημένου τέκνου
|
τοκεύς, τροφὸς δὲ κύματος νεοσπόρου
. Cp. above,
Aesch. Eum. 366
n.
mvp-comment-313-1
τοῦ χάριν, τίνων
629
mvp-comment-313-2
The alternative, which most editors have preferred, is to take
τίνων
as the participle. But there is an insuperable objection to this, which seems to have escaped notice. The words,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could mean only, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
for what?’ They could not mean, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
to whom?’ The latter would be
τῷ χάριν τίνων
; See (
e.g.)
Aesch.
P. V. 985
καὶ μὴν ὀφείλων ἂν τίνοιμ’ αὐτῷ χάριν
:
Aesch.
Ag. 821
τούτων θεοῖσι χρὴ πολύμνηστον χάριν
|
τίνειν
. Hence the question,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could not possibly be answered by
Ἀργείων
. For, evidently, the latter word could not mean, (‘for a benefit conferred by) the Greeks.’ A scholiast in the Baroccian MS. (cr. n. on 545), who explains
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
by
τίνος χάριν ἀποδιδούς
, plainly meant, ‘showing gratitude for what?’—and his paraphrase was correct; only he overlooked the context.
mvp-comment-314-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ μετῆν
630
mvp-comment-315-1
ἀλλ’ ἀντ’ ἀδελφοῦ δῆτα
631
κτανὼν
632
mvp-comment-315-2
ἀντὶ ἀδελφοῦ
633
mvp-comment-315-3
τἄμ’
634
mvp-comment-316-1
παῖδες … διπλοῖ
635
mvp-comment-316-2
540 f. Nauck would prefer a single verse in place of these two, viz.
οὓς Ἰφιγενείας εἰκὸς ἦν θνῄσκειν πάρος
.
mvp-comment-317-1
ἢ
636
mvp-comment-317-2
ἢ τῶν ἐμῶν Ἅιδης
637
mvp-comment-318-1
δαίσασθαι
638
mvp-comment-318-2
The conj.
λῄσασθαι
639
mvp-comment-319-1
πανώλει
640
mvp-comment-319-2
παρεῖτο
641
mvp-comment-319-3
The sense does not absolutely require us to take
Μενέλεω δ’
642
mvp-comment-320-1
ἀβούλου
643
mvp-comment-320-2
κακοῦ γνώμην
644
mvp-comment-321-1
δοκῶ μέν
645
mvp-comment-321-2
εἰ καὶ
646
mvp-comment-322-1
εἰ φωνὴν λάβοι
647
mvp-comment-323-1
τοῖς πεπραγμένοις
648
mvp-comment-324-1
γνώμην δικαίαν σχοῦσα
649
mvp-comment-325-1
ἐρεῖς μὲν οὐχὶ
650
ἐρεῖς
651
ἐρεῖς … μ’ ὡς
652
mvp-comment-325-2
ἄρξασά τι λυπηρὸν
653
mvp-comment-325-3
τάδ’ ἐξήκους’
654
mvp-comment-326-1
τοῦ τεθνηκότος θ’ ὕπερ
655
mvp-comment-327-1
καὶ μὴν
656
mvp-comment-327-2
λόγους ἐξῆρχές με
657
mvp-comment-328-1
Clytaemnestra has argued that she was justified in slaying Agamemnon, because he had slain Iphigeneia. The topics of Electra's reply are as follows.
mvp-comment-328-2
(1) 558—562. The wife who slew her husband would be a criminal, even if the motive had been just retribution; but the real motive was her love for Aegisthus. (2) 563—576. Agamemnon was not a free agent in slaying Iphigeneia; the act was forced upon him by Artemis. (3) 577—583. Suppose, however, that he was a free agent, and wished to please his brother; still she was not justified in taking his life. (4) 584—594. And in any case her plea does not excuse her for living with the man who helped to slay her husband.—The speech then closes in a strain of reproach and defiance (595 —609).
mvp-comment-328-3
καὶ δὴ λέγω σοι
658
πατέρα
659
φὴς
660
mvp-comment-329-1
εἴτ’ οὖν … εἴτε
661
mvp-comment-329-2
λέξω
662
δείξω
663
mvp-comment-330-1
ὡς οὐ δίκῃ γ’
664
ἔσπασεν
665
πειθὼ
666
mvp-comment-331-1
κυναγὸν
667
mvp-comment-331-2
ποινὰς
668
mvp-comment-331-3
τὰ πολλὰ πνεύματ’ ἔσχ’
669
τὰ πολλὰ
670
ἔσχε
671
mvp-comment-331-4
Acc. to Aesch. (
Aesch.
Ag. 149
f.,
Aesch. Ag. 192
), the Greeks were detained by
adverse winds, blowing from the N.E. : and this seems to have been the account given in the
Cypria (
c. 776 B.C.), Proclus
Chrest. p. 455:
ἐπέσχεν αὐτοὺς τοῦ πλοῦ χειμῶνας ἐπιπέμπουσα
. But other authorities speak of a
calm. Thus
I. A. 9 ff.
οὔκουν φθόγγος γ’ οὔτ’ ὀρνίθων
|
οὔτε θαλάσσης· σιγαὶ δ’ ἀνέμων
|
τόνδε κατ’ Εὔριπον ἔχουσιν
. Schol.
Eur.
Or. 647
ἐπειράθη τῆς θεοῦ ὀργιζομένης καὶ κατεχούσης τοὺς ἀνέμους
. Tzetzes on Lycophron 183
χολωθεῖσα δ’ ἐπὶ τούτῳ ἡ θεὸς τοὺς ἀνέμους κατέσχεν
. Ovid (
Met. 13. 183
) combines both versions:
exspectata diu, nulla aut contraria classi | Flamina sunt.
mvp-comment-331-5
It has been objected that vessels provided with oars need not have been detained by a calm. But the ships of the Greek fleet were not light craft. Each carried from 50 to 120 armed men, besides
σκεύη πολεμικά
: and the warriors were also the rowers (cp.
Thuc. 1. 10
). It is intelligible, then, that they should await the aid of wind before attempting the passage of the Aegaean. We must remember, too, the strong and shifting currents in the Euripus (
στονόεντα πορθμόν
,
Soph.
Ant. 1145
:
παλιρρόχθοις ἐν Αὐλίδος τόποις
,
Aesch.
Ag. 191
).
mvp-comment-331-6
We cannot well render:—(1)‘He
suffered those tedious winds,’—supplying
ὁ πατήρ
from v. 558. Nor: (2) ‘She
directed those tedious winds at Aulis,’—a version which would at least require
ἐπ’ Αὐλίδι
. Cp.
Ph. 1119
ἔχε
|
δύσποτμον ἀρὰν ἐπ’ ἄλλοις
.
mvp-comment-331-7
The conjecture
πλοῖα
672
mvp-comment-331-8
Αὐλίδι
673
mvp-comment-332-1
ἢ )γὼ φράσω
674
κείνης
675
mvp-comment-333-1
ὡς ἐγὼ κλύω
676
mvp-comment-333-2
θεᾶς … κατ’ ἄλσος
677
mvp-comment-333-3
παίζων
678
mvp-comment-333-4
ποδοῖν
679
mvp-comment-334-1
ἔλαφον
680
mvp-comment-334-2
στικτὸν
681
mvp-comment-334-3
κεράστην
682
mvp-comment-334-4
οὗ κατὰ σφαγὰς
683
mvp-comment-335-1
ἐκκομπάσας ἔπος τι τυγχάνει
684
βαλών
685
mvp-comment-335-2
This is the reason against taking
τυγχάνει
with
βαλών
, as=‘he shoots and hits’; cp.
Il. 15. 581
θηρητὴρ ἐτύχησε βαλών
:
Her. 3. 35
εἰ...τοῦ παιδὸς...βαλὼν τύχοιμι
. The vaunt must then
precede the hit.
mvp-comment-335-3
Others take
βαλὼν
686
ἔπος
687
mvp-comment-335-4
Monk, with Musgrave, took
σφαγὰς
688
mvp-comment-336-1
ἐκ τοῦδε
689
mvp-comment-336-2
μηνίσασα
690
mvp-comment-336-3
Λητῴα κόρη
691
mvp-comment-337-1
ὡς
692
ἀντίσταθμον
693
mvp-comment-337-2
ἐκθύσειε
694
mvp-comment-338-1
ὧδ’ ἦν
695
mvp-comment-338-2
τὰ … θύματ’
696
mvp-comment-338-3
λύσις
697
mvp-comment-338-4
πρὸς οἶκον
698
mvp-comment-339-1
πολλὰ
699
mvp-comment-339-2
ἀντιβὰς
700
mvp-comment-339-3
μόλις
701
mvp-comment-340-1
εἰ δ’ οὖν
702
mvp-comment-340-2
ἐρῶ γὰρ καὶ τὸ σόν
703
mvp-comment-341-1
τούτου … οὕνεκ’
704
mvp-comment-341-2
νόμῳ
705
mvp-comment-342-1
ὅρα
706
μὴ … τιθῇς
707
τίθης
708
mvp-comment-342-2
Here, either
τίθης
or
τιθῇς
would be suitable. (1) With
τίθης
:—‘See that, in making this rule, you
are not making woe for yourself.’ This means that to make the rule (as she is doing) is at once (logically) to make the woe. (2) With
τιθῇς
: —‘See
lest, in making this rule, you
make woe for yourself’:
i.e., the rule may have the woe as a consequence. The woe is a future contingency (583
εἰ δίκης γε τυγχάνοις
), against which Electra warns her. On the whole, I now prefer
τιθῇς
.
Cp. 1003
ὅρα κακῶς πράσσοντε μὴ μείζω κακὰ
|
κτησώμεθ’
: fr. 82
ἀλλ’ ὅρα μὴ κρεῖσσον ᾖ
.
mvp-comment-342-3
τιθεῖσα … νόμον
709
mvp-comment-343-1
εἰ γὰρ κτενοῦμεν
710
mvp-comment-343-2
πρώτη
711
mvp-comment-344-1
εἰσόρα
712
mvp-comment-344-2
οὐκ οὖσαν
713
mvp-comment-344-3
τίθης
714
mvp-comment-344-4
εἰ … θέλεις
715
mvp-comment-345-1
τῷ παλαμναίῳ
716
mvp-comment-345-2
πρόσθεν ἐξαπώλεσας
717
mvp-comment-346-1
παιδοποιεῖς
718
mvp-comment-346-2
Erigonè, daughter of Aegisthus and Clytaemnestra (Tzetzes on
Lyc. 1374
), was mentioned by the early cyclic poet Cinaethon (
Paus. 2. 18. 6
), and was the theme of Sophocles in his
Ἠριγόνη
. Hyginus (
Hyg.
Fab. 122
) notices a son of Aegisthus named Aletes, who gives his name to a play by Sophocles, but does not record the mother: see p. xliii note 4.
mvp-comment-346-3
εὐσεβεῖς
719
mvp-comment-346-4
κἀξ εὐσεβῶν
720
mvp-comment-346-5
By
τοὺς...πρόσθεν εὐσεβεῖς
Electra means Orestes and herself. Both are ‘cast out’ of their just rights. Cp.
O.T. 611
φίλον ...ἐσθλὸν ἐκβαλεῖν
.
Eur.
El. 62
τεκοῦσα δ’ ἄλλους παῖδας Αἰγίσθῳ πάρα
|
πάρεργ’ Ὀρέστην κἀμὲ ποιεῖται δόμων.
mvp-comment-346-6
βλαστόντας
721
mvp-comment-346-7
ἐκβαλοῦσ’ ἔχεις
722
mvp-comment-347-1
πῶς ταῦτ’ ἐπαινέσαιμ’ ἄν
723
mvp-comment-347-2
ἢ
724
ἦ
725
καὶ τοῦτ’
726
ἄποινα
727
mvp-comment-348-1
αἰσχρῶς δ’
728
δ’
729
mvp-comment-348-2
ἐάν περ καὶ λέγῃς
730
mvp-comment-348-3
ἐχθροῖς γαμεῖσθαι
731
mvp-comment-348-4
These two verses, though not indispensable, seem genuine. Were they omitted, the transition from 592 to 595 would be somewhat abrupt.
mvp-comment-349-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ γὰρ
732
mvp-comment-349-2
πᾶσαν ἵης γλῶσσαν
733
mvp-comment-350-1
κακοστομοῦμεν
734
mvp-comment-350-2
καί σ’ ἔγωγε δεσπότιν
735
mvp-comment-350-3
εἰς ἡμᾶς
736
ἣ
737
mvp-comment-351-1
βίον μοχθηρόν
738
mvp-comment-351-2
ἔκ τε σοῦ
739
κακοῖς … ξυνοῦσα
740
mvp-comment-351-3
συννόμου
741
mvp-comment-352-1
ὁ δ’ ἄλλος
742
mvp-comment-352-2
χεῖρα σὴν
743
mvp-comment-352-3
τρίβει βίον
744
mvp-comment-352-4
603 The reason for writing
δή με σοὶ
745
δή μέ σοι
746
mvp-comment-352-5
μιάστορα
747
mvp-comment-353-1
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκα
748
mvp-comment-354-1
εἰς ἅπαντας
749
mvp-comment-354-2
χρῇς
750
mvp-comment-354-3
στόμαργον
751
mvp-comment-355-1
τῶνδε τῶν ἔ|ργων ἴδρις
752
mvp-comment-355-2
σχεδόν τι
753
mvp-comment-355-3
οὐ καταισχύνω
754
mvp-comment-356-1
ὁρῶ μένος πνέουσαν
755
μένος πνέουσαν
756
mvp-comment-356-2
σὺν δίκῃ ξύνεστι
757
mvp-comment-356-3
Other interpretations are:—(1) ‘I see that Electra is wroth; but as to whether she is in the right, I see no concern (anywhere),’—a timid way of saying that
Clytaemnestra shows no such concern. So the schol. (2) ‘I see that Clytaemnestra is angry, but not that she cares whether she is right’:—an inference from some gesture. Both these versions rely on the fact that
φροντίδος
(612) is plainly an echo of
φροντίδ’
(611). But: (
a) it does not follow that
φροντίδ’
is not
Electra's thought. (
b) It is surely clear that
πνέουσαν
must be Electra; and (
c) as in
Ant. 471
f., the second clause naturally refers to the same person.
mvp-comment-357-1
ποίας δ’ ἐμοὶ δεῖ
758
ἐμοὶ
759
μοι
760
δεῖ
761
mvp-comment-357-2
Others understand: (1) ‘If Electra has no consideration for justice, why should I have any consideration for her,—
i.e., show her any tenderness?’ Or: (2) ‘If she heeds not justice, why should I heed her?’ Neither view seems well suited to the context.
mvp-comment-358-1
καὶ ταῦτα
762
mvp-comment-358-2
τηλικοῦτος
763
mvp-comment-358-3
ἆρα
764
mvp-comment-358-4
χωρεῖν ἂν
765
εἰς πᾶν ἔργον
766
mvp-comment-359-1
εὖ νυν ἐπίστω
767
mvp-comment-359-2
ἔξωρα
768
mvp-comment-359-3
προσεικότα
769
mvp-comment-360-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
770
mvp-comment-360-2
ἡ … ἐκ σοῦ δυσμένεια
771
mvp-comment-360-3
ἐξαναγκάζει
772
αἰσχροῖς
773
mvp-comment-360-4
622 f. The word
θρέμμα
774
mvp-comment-360-5
ἦ σ’ ἐγὼ
775
mvp-comment-361-1
νιν
776
mvp-comment-361-2
εὑρίσκεται
777
mvp-comment-361-3
Cp. Milton,
Apology for Smectymnuus (in his
Prose Works, ed. Symmons, vol. I. p. 236): ‘I might also tell them [the prelates], what Electra in Sophocles, a wise virgin, answered her wicked mother, who thought herself too violently reproved by her the daughter: ‘'
Tis you that say it,
not I; you do the deeds, |
And your ungodly deeds find me the words.’’
mvp-comment-362-1
οὐ μὰ
778
mvp-comment-362-2
δέσποιναν
779
mvp-comment-362-3
Ἄρτεμιν
780
mvp-comment-362-4
θράσους τοῦδ’ οὐκ ἀλύξεις
781
μόλῃ
782
mvp-comment-363-1
ὁρᾷς
783
mvp-comment-363-2
ἐκφέρει
784
mvp-comment-363-3
The
v. l.
παρεῖσα
785
mvp-comment-364-1
οὐδὲ
786
mvp-comment-364-2
ὑπ’ εὐφήμου βοῆς
787
mvp-comment-364-3
ἐπειδὴ σοί γ’
788
mvp-comment-364-4
πᾶν λέγειν
789
mvp-comment-365-1
κελεύω
790
mvp-comment-365-2
τοὐμὸν στόμ’
791
mvp-comment-365-3
634 f. An altar, and probably an image, of Apollo stand before the palace. The attendant of Clytaemnestra carries offerings of various fruits, which she is now commanded to
raise, as with a gesture of solemn oblation (
ἔπαιρε
792
mvp-comment-365-4
ἡ παροῦσά μοι
793
mvp-comment-365-5
θύματα … πάγκαρπα
794
mvp-comment-366-1
λυτηρίους … δειμάτων
795
mvp-comment-366-2
ἀνάσχω
796
mvp-comment-367-1
κλύοις ἂν
797
mvp-comment-367-2
προστατήριε
798
mvp-comment-368-1
κεκρυμμένην
799
mvp-comment-368-2
οὐ γὰρ ἐν φίλοις
800
mvp-comment-369-1
πρὸς φῶς
801
mvp-comment-370-1
πολυγλώσσῳ
802
mvp-comment-370-2
σπείρῃ
803
mvp-comment-370-3
ματαίαν
804
mvp-comment-371-1
ὧδ’
805
mvp-comment-372-1
γὰρ
806
mvp-comment-372-2
δισσῶν ὀνείρων
807
mvp-comment-372-3
Jacobs Fr.(
ap. Wunder) understood, ‘
two dreams,’—as if Clyt.'s vision consisted of two parts,—the return of Agamemnon, and the growth from the sceptre (417—423). This seems forced. Still less can we assume that there was some second dream which Clyt. did not relate even to the Sun-god (425).
mvp-comment-372-4
Λύκεἰ ἄναξ
808
mvp-comment-373-1
ἐσθλά … ἐχθρά
809
mvp-comment-373-2
Cp.
Aesch.
Pers. 217
, where the Chorus are advising Atossa how to propitiate the gods after her dream:
εἴ τι φλαῦρον εἶδες, αἰτοῦ τῶνδ’ ἀποτροπὴν τελεῖν
, |
τὰ δ’ ἀγάθ’ ἐκτελῆ γενέσθαι σοί τε καὶ τέκνῳ σέθεν κ.τ.λ.
mvp-comment-373-3
ἔμπαλιν μέθες
810
mvp-comment-374-1
εἴ τινες
811
mvp-comment-375-1
ἀλλ’ ὧδε
812
mvp-comment-375-2
ἀβλαβεῖ βίῳ
813
mvp-comment-376-1
δόμους
814
mvp-comment-376-2
ἀμφέπειν
815
mvp-comment-376-3
φίλοισι
816
mvp-comment-377-1
εὐημεροῦσαν
817
mvp-comment-377-2
καὶ τέκνων
818
ὅσων
819
mvp-comment-377-3
We might also take
τέκνων
as standing, by attraction, for
τέκνοις
. When the antecedent is thus attracted, it usually comes after the relative (
O.C. 56); but sometimes precedes it, as in
Tr. 151
f.
τότ’ ἄν τις εἰσίδοιτο
... | ...
κακοῖσιν
(for
κακά
)
ο<*>ς ἐγὼ βαρύνομαι
. In examples of the latter kind, however, the acc. (and not, as it would be here, the dat.) is elsewhere the case attracted. In favour of taking
τέκνων
as partitive, it may be added that this suits the distinction between two groups of
τέκνα
. By
ὅσων
she means Chrysothemis, Iphianassa, and the offspring o<*> her union with Aegisthus (157; 589).
mvp-comment-377-4
ἐμοὶ … πρόσεστιν
820
mvp-comment-378-1
πᾶσιν ἡμῖν
821
mvp-comment-379-1
τὰ δ’ ἄλλα πάντα
822
mvp-comment-379-2
660 Following the directions given in vv. 39 ff., the Paedagogus now appears as a
ξένος Φωκεύς
. Cp.
O.T. 924 ff., where the messenger from Corinth presents himself to Iocasta and the Chorus.
mvp-comment-379-3
πῶς ἂν εἰδείην
823
mvp-comment-380-1
ἦ καὶ
824
mvp-comment-380-2
ἐπεικάζων κυρῶ
825
mvp-comment-380-3
πρέπ<*> γὰρ
826
mvp-comment-381-1
μάλιστα πάντων
827
mvp-comment-381-2
ἥδε σοι κείνη πάρα
828
mvp-comment-381-3
666 f. The
ὦ
829
χαῖρε
830
mvp-comment-382-1
ἐδεξάμην τὸ ῥηθέν
831
mvp-comment-382-2
Instant recognition of an utterance as well-omened was a way of appropriating the omen. The proper formula was
δέχομαι τὸν οἰωνόν
or
τὸν ὄρνιν
(
Her. 9. 91
;
Ar.
Pl. 63
). But
δέχομαι
alone was enough (
Xen.
An. 1. 8. 17
: cp.
Aesch.
Ag. 1653
δεχομένοις λέγεις θανεῖν σε
). The phrase used here recurs in
Her. 8. 114
δεξάμενος τὸ ῥηθὲν ἀπαλλάσσετο
: cp. also
Eur.
El. 622
προσηκάμην τὸ ῥηθέν
.
mvp-comment-382-3
εἰδέναι … σου
832
mvp-comment-383-1
Φανοτεὺς
833
mvp-comment-383-2
πρᾶγμα πορσύνων μέγα
834
mvp-comment-384-1
τὸ ποῖον
835
mvp-comment-385-1
ἐν βραχεῖ ξυνθεὶς
836
mvp-comment-386-1
τί φής, τί φής
837
ξεῖνε
838
mvp-comment-386-2
ταύτης
839
mvp-comment-387-1
νῦν τε καὶ πάλαι
840
mvp-comment-388-1
οὐδέν εἰμ’ ἔτι
841
mvp-comment-389-1
τὰ σαυτῆς πρᾶσς’
842
mvp-comment-389-2
διόλλυται
843
mvp-comment-390-1
κἀπεμπόμην
844
καὶ … φράσω
845
mvp-comment-391-1
γὰρ
846
mvp-comment-392-1
πρόσχημ’ ἀγῶνος
847
Ἑλλάδος
848
mvp-comment-392-2
πρόσχημα
849
mvp-comment-392-3
Δελφ. ἄθλων
850
mvp-comment-393-1
ὀρθίων
851
mvp-comment-393-2
δρόμον … οὗ πρώτη κρίσις
852
mvp-comment-394-1
εἰσῆλθε
853
mvp-comment-395-1
ἰσώσας * τἀφέσει
854
τῇ φύσει
855
mvp-comment-395-2
Now there is evidence that the customary order for the foot-races was, 1.
δόλιχος
, 2.
στάδιον
, 3.
δίαυλος
. See Boeckh
C. I. G. no. 1590 and 1591 (referring to games at Thespiae,
circ. 240 B.C.): also no. 2214 (games at Chios,
circ. 100—80 B.C.).
Paus. 6. 13. 3
(of the athlete Polites at Olympia),
δολίχου τε ἐν ἡμέρᾳ τῇ αὐτῇ καὶ παραυτίκα σταδίου λαβὼν νίκην προσέθηκε διαύλου σφίσι τὴν τρίτην
. It would agree, then, with the words
οὗ πρώτη κρίσις
(684) if the
δόλιχος
were meant here. [As to
Legg. 833 D, see Appendix.]
mvp-comment-395-3
For
ἄφεσις
as=‘starting-place,’ cp. Suidas (
s.v.
ἀπὸ γραμμῆς
):
γραμμῆς, ἣν ἄφεσιν καὶ βαλβῖδα καλοῦσιν
:
Paus. 6. 20. 9
ᾗ τοῖς σταδιοδρόμοις ἄφεσις πεποίηται
:
id. 5. 15. 5
ἐν δὲ τῶν ἵππων τῇ
ἀφέσει, ἐν μὲν τῷ ὑπαίθρῳ τῆς ἀφέσεως κ.τ.λ.
—Dindorf notes that in Aristeides vol. I. p. 339 the words
τῆς ἀφέσεως
were corrupted to
τῆς φύσεως
.
mvp-comment-395-4
The proposed versions of the vulgate
τῇ φύσει
856
mvp-comment-396-1
νίκης … γέρας
857
mvp-comment-397-1
χὥπως μὲν
858
mvp-comment-397-2
Others explain:—
οὐκ οἶδα δὲ ὅπως τοιοῦδ’ ἀνδρὸς ἔργα καὶ κράτη λέγω σοι παῦρα ἐν πολλοῖς
: ‘I do not know how to describe his deeds to you briefly, when they were so many.’ The place of
οἶδα
can be justified by
O.T. 1251. But: (1) thus construed, the words ought to mean, ‘I do not know how to describe his deeds
as few.’ The other meaning would require
ἐν παύροις
, or the like. And (2)
ἐν πολλοῖσι
is then awkward.