mvp-comment-52-1
τὰ … παννυχίδων
1
ξυνίσας’
2
ὅσα … θρηνῶ
3
mvp-comment-52-2
ἤδη
4
mvp-comment-52-3
The MS.
οἴκων
5
λέκτρων
6
μογερῶν
7
mvp-comment-53-1
ὅσα τὸν δύστηνον
8
mvp-comment-54-1
κατὰ μὲν βάρβαρον αἶαν
9
ἐξένισεν
10
mvp-comment-55-1
Ἄρης
11
mvp-comment-55-2
ἐξένισεν
12
mvp-comment-56-1
κοινολεχὴς
13
mvp-comment-57-1
ὅπως δρῦν ὑλοτόμοι
14
mvp-comment-57-2
σχίζουσι
15
mvp-comment-57-3
κάρα
16
mvp-comment-57-4
πέλεκει
17
mvp-comment-58-1
ἄλλης
18
mvp-comment-58-2
φέρεται
19
mvp-comment-58-3
The deletion of the words
ἀπ’ ἄλλης
20
ἢ )μοῦ
21
mvp-comment-59-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ μὲν δὴ
22
mvp-comment-60-1
ἄστρων
23
mvp-comment-60-2
Others read,
ἔστ’ ἂν λεύσσω παμφεγγεῖς
|
ῥιπάς, λεύσσω δὲ τόδ’ ἦμαρ
, omitting
ἄστρων
. But
παμφεγγεῖς ῥιπάς
, without
ἄστρων
, would not suffice to denote starlight. If, again, the phrase is taken to denote the
sun's rays (as Monk proposes,
Mus. Crit. I. p. 67), then
λεύσσω δὲ τόδ’ ἦμαρ
becomes weak. Further, the preceding context, in which she has spoken of her laments
at night (92) and at morning, clearly suggests that the sense here is, ‘so long as I look on the
stars or on the
sun.’
mvp-comment-61-1
μὴ οὐ
24
mvp-comment-61-2
τεκνολέτειῤ
25
mvp-comment-62-1
ἐπὶ κωκυτῷ
26
mvp-comment-62-2
ἠχὼ
27
mvp-comment-63-1
Electra invokes, (1) the house of Hades and his bride Persephone, in which the spirit of Agamemnon now dwells; (2) Hermes, who, as
ψυχοπομπός
, conducted him thither,—and who will also guide the avengers on their way (1395 f.); (3)
Ἀρά
, the imprecation uttered by the victim upon his murderers,—the personified curse, here conceived as a supernatural power (
πότνια
), which calls the Erinyes into action; and (4) the Erinyes themselves.
mvp-comment-63-2
Ἀΐδου
28
mvp-comment-64-1
ὦ χθόνἰ Ἑρμῆ
29
mvp-comment-64-2
Ἀρά
30
mvp-comment-64-3
πότνια
31
mvp-comment-65-1
σεμναὶ
32
mvp-comment-65-2
θεῶν παῖδες
33
mvp-comment-66-1
ὁρᾶθ’
34
mvp-comment-67-1
αἳ τοὺς εὐνὰς ὑποκλεπτομένους
35
mvp-comment-67-2
These much-impugned words appear genuine. The murder has been prompted by the guilty love:
δόλος ἦν ὁ φράσας, ἔρος ὁ κτείνας
(197). In Electra's thought, they are inseparable. The allusion to the love
follows the reference to the murder, because she regards it as the crowning outrage (271
τὴν τελευταίαν ὕβριν
) that Clytaemnestra still lives with Aegisthus. Bloodshed was not the only sin which the Erinyes punished. They were the embodied sanctions of natural law, and every crime against the family came within their cognisance. (See
Introd. to Homer, p. 51, § 13.) Indeed, Electra herself speaks of the unhallowed union as a special provocation to those Avengers: 275 f.
ἡ δ’ ὧδε τλήμων ὥστε τῷ μιάστορι
|
ξύνεστ’, Ἐρινὺν οὔτιν’ ἐκφοβουμένη
.
mvp-comment-68-1
τείσασθε
36
mvp-comment-69-1
ἡμετέρου
37
μοι
38
mvp-comment-69-2
καί μοι
39
mvp-comment-70-1
ἄγειν
40
mvp-comment-70-2
σωκῶ
41
mvp-comment-71-1
δυστανοτάτας
42
mvp-comment-72-1
τάκεις … οἰμωγὰν
43
mvp-comment-72-2
ἀκόρεστον
44
mvp-comment-72-3
τὸν πάλαι
45
mvp-comment-72-4
πάλαι
46
ἐκ
47
mvp-comment-72-5
ἀθεώτατα
48
mvp-comment-72-6
κακᾷ … χειρὶ πρόδοτον
49
χειρὶ
50
mvp-comment-72-7
ὡς
51
mvp-comment-72-8
ὁ τάδε πορὼν
52
mvp-comment-72-9
εἴ μοι θέμις
53
mvp-comment-73-1
γενέθλα
54
mvp-comment-73-2
γενναίων
55
mvp-comment-73-3
παραμύθ‐
56
ιον
57
mvp-comment-74-1
ξυνίημι
58
mvp-comment-74-2
τάδ’
59
mvp-comment-75-1
φυγγάνει
60
mvp-comment-75-2
οὐδ’ ἐθέλω
61
mvp-comment-76-1
μὴ οὐ
62
mvp-comment-76-2
τὸν ἐμὸν … πατέρ’ ἄθλιον
63
mvp-comment-77-1
παντοίας
64
mvp-comment-77-2
Electra's lyrics contain some Doricisms (129, 146 f., etc.): but it is best to retain
φιλότητος
, with the MSS. The form in
η
was so familiar through Homer that it may have been preferred to
φιλότατος
even in lyrics.
Cp. 236
.
mvp-comment-78-1
ἀλύειν
65
mvp-comment-79-1
αἰαῖ, ἱκνοῦμαι
66
mvp-comment-80-1
τόν γ’ ἐξ Ἀΐδα … λίμνας
67
mvp-comment-80-2
παγκοίνου
68
mvp-comment-80-3
ἀνστάσεις
69
mvp-comment-81-1
οὔτε †γόοις οὔτε λιταῖσιν
70
οὔτε γόοισιν οὔτ’ εὐχαῖς
71
mvp-comment-82-1
For the repetition of
ἀλλά
72
mvp-comment-82-2
ἀπὸ τῶν μετρίων
73
mvp-comment-82-3
ἀμήχανον
74
mvp-comment-82-4
ο=ιόλλυσαι
75
mvp-comment-83-1
ἐν οἷς
76
mvp-comment-83-2
ἀνάλυσις … κακῶν
77
mvp-comment-83-3
τί μοι
78
mvp-comment-84-1
νήπιος
79
mvp-comment-84-2
γονέων
80
mvp-comment-85-1
ἐμέ γ’ … ἄραρεν
81
mvp-comment-85-2
φρένας
82
mvp-comment-86-1
αἰὲν Ἴτυν
83
mvp-comment-87-1
ὄρνις
84
mvp-comment-87-2
ἀτυζομένα
85
mvp-comment-87-3
Διὸς ἄγγελος
86
mvp-comment-88-1
Νιόβα, σὲ δ’
87
θεόν
88
mvp-comment-88-2
ἅτ’
89
mvp-comment-88-3
ἐν τάφῳ πετραίῳ
90
mvp-comment-89-1
αἰεὶ
91
mvp-comment-90-1
οὔτοι σοὶ μούνᾳ
92
mvp-comment-91-1
πρὸς ὅ τι
93
mvp-comment-91-2
τῶν ἔνδον εἶ περισσά
94
mvp-comment-92-1
οἷς
95
τῶν ἔνδον
96
mvp-comment-92-2
ὁμόθεν
97
γονᾷ ξύναιμος
98
mvp-comment-93-1
οἵα Χρ. ζώει
99
mvp-comment-93-2
Acc. to the version followed by Sophocles, Agamemnon had four daughters, Iphigeneia, Electra, Chrysothemis, Iphianassa. This was the account given in the cyclic
Κύπρια ἔπη
, as the schol. here mentions; a poem of which there is another trace in this play (566 ff.). Sophocles wrote an
Ἰφιγένεια
(
Nauck,
frag. Soph. 284—292
); but her name is not mentioned in the reference to her death below (530—594). In
Il. 9. 145
Agamemnon has three daughters, Chrysothemis, Laodicè, Iphianassa: Homer does not mention Iphigeneia. Lucretius gives the name of Iphianassa to the victim at Aulis (
1. 85
).
mvp-comment-93-3
ζώει
100
mvp-comment-93-4
καὶ Ἰφιάνασσα
101
mvp-comment-94-1
ἀχέων
102
mvp-comment-94-2
Hermann, taking
ἀχέων
103
κρυπτᾷ
104
mvp-comment-95-1
ὄλβιος, ὃν
105
mvp-comment-95-2
For the simple
ὅς
, instead of
ὅς γε
or
ὅστις
, with causal force, cp. below, 188, 261, 959;
O.T. 817.
mvp-comment-96-1
δέξεται εὐπατρίδαν
106
mvp-comment-96-2
Διὸς εὔφρονι
107
βήματι
108
mvp-comment-96-3
γᾶν
109
γᾶ
110
mvp-comment-96-4
Ὀρέσταν
111
ὃν
112
mvp-comment-97-1
ἀκάματα
113
mvp-comment-97-2
ἀνύμφευτος
114
ἄτεκνος
115
mvp-comment-97-3
οἰχνῶ
116
mvp-comment-98-1
δάκρυσι μυδαλέα
117
mvp-comment-98-2
τὸν ἀνήνυτον
118
mvp-comment-98-3
οἶτον ἔχουσα
119
mvp-comment-99-1
ὧν τ’ ἔπαθ’
120
ὧν τ’ ἐδάη
121
mvp-comment-99-2
Wecklein, reading
ἐδάην
, explains,— ‘what I have heard from him,’—viz., his promises of coming.
mvp-comment-99-3
τί γὰρ … ἀγγελίας
122
mvp-comment-99-4
ἀπατώμενον
123
τί … οὐκ
124
mvp-comment-99-5
Herwerden's
οὐχί μοι
125
οὐκ ἐμοί
126
ὁ δέ
127
mvp-comment-100-1
ποθεῖ, ποθῶν δ’
128
mvp-comment-101-1
ἔτι μέγας οὐρανῷ
129
ἐν
130
mvp-comment-102-1
τὸν ὑπεραλγῆ
131
mvp-comment-102-2
νέμουσα
132
mvp-comment-103-1
μήτε ὑπεράχθεο
133
οἷς
134
mvp-comment-104-1
εὐμαρὴς θεός
135
θεός
136
mvp-comment-105-1
οὔτε γὰρ
137
mvp-comment-105-2
Κρῖσαν
138
mvp-comment-105-3
Crisa stood about two miles W.S.W. of Delphi, on a spur of Parnassus, at the lower outlet of the gorge through which the river Pleistus issues into the plain. The
Iliad mentions ‘sacred Crisa’ (
ζαθέην
, 2. 520). But the Homeric Hymn to the Pythian Apollo is the best witness to its ancient power. There, just as here, the name
Κρῖσα
includes the land which stretches southward from the town to its harbour on the ‘wide gulf’ (vv. 253— 261). We need not, then, read
Κρίσᾳ
or
Κρίσας
. Crisa was the earliest seat of trade on the western sea; Delphi, when first founded, was merely a sanctuary in its territory. Pindar recalls the old prominence of its name when he describes a Pythian victory as won
Κρισαίαις ἐνὶ πτυχαῖς
(
P. 6. 18).
mvp-comment-105-4
Cirrha, a town of much later date, was the port of Crisa on the gulf. About 585 B.C., the Delphians, aided by Cleisthenes of Sicyon and his allies, succeeded, after a long struggle, in humbling Crisa and destroying Cirrha. The Crisaean plain was then devoted to Apollo, whose domain was thus extended from his temple to the coast. When Sophocles wrote, that ground was still a
βούνομος ἀκτή
, inviolable by plough or spade. It was not till the middle of the next century that the alleged encroachments of Amphissa on the
ἱερὰ χώρα
gave a pretext for war to the Amphictyons (355 B.C.).
mvp-comment-105-5
Ulrichs (
Reisen in Griechenland) was the first to place the relations of Crisa and Cirrha in a clear light. Strabo correctly describes the site of Cirrha, but erroneously places Crisa to the east of it (9. p. 418).
mvp-comment-106-1
βούνομον
139
βουνόμον
140
mvp-comment-106-2
βούνομον ἀκτὰν
141
Κρῖσαν
142
mvp-comment-107-1
ἀπερίτροπος
143
mvp-comment-108-1
παρὰ τὸν Ἀχέροντα
144
ἀνάσσων
145
θεὸς
146
mvp-comment-109-1
μὲν
147
mvp-comment-109-2
ὁ πολὺς … βίοτος
148
mvp-comment-109-3
ἀνέλπιστος
149
mvp-comment-109-4
187 *
τεκέων
. I am now satisfied that this is a true correction of
τοκέων
150
ἅτις
151
τοκέων
152
mvp-comment-110-1
ἁπερεί
153
mvp-comment-110-2
ἔποικος
154
mvp-comment-111-1
οἰκονομῶ θαλάμους
155
mvp-comment-112-1
ἀεικεῖ σὺν στολᾷ
156
mvp-comment-113-1
κεναῖς δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
157
ἀμφίσταμαι
158
mvp-comment-113-2
Hartung, reading
κενὰ δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
, takes the sense to be that she stands ‘hungry’ by the tables at which the others feast. But
κενή
as=
νῆστις
would be neither usual nor elegant.
mvp-comment-114-1
Hitherto the Chorus have offered consolation or counsel. At v. 213 they return to that strain. But here, moved by Electra's misery, they join with her in bewailing its cause.
mvp-comment-114-2
οἰκτρὰ μὲν … πλαγά
159
κοίταις
160
οἰκτρὰ … αὐδὰ
161
mvp-comment-114-3
Sophocles, who follows the Homeric story as to the banquet, could not but remember the
οἰκτροτάτην ὄπα
of the dying Cassandra. And this might naturally suggest to him that other
οἰκτρὰ αὐδή
which she had uttered at an earlier moment, immediately after Agamemnon's return,—her presage of his fate, and her own:
Aesch.
Ag. 1072
—1314.
mvp-comment-114-4
The sense then is:—‘There was a voice of lamentation at the return from Troy’; alluding especially to Cassandra's laments, but also, perhaps, to forebodings in the mouth of the people at Mycenae. ‘And there was a voice of lamentation
ἐν κοίταις πατρῴαις
, when thy father lay on the couch at the fatal banquet.’ The ‘voice’ at the banquet is, first, that of the dying Agamemnon; but Sophocles may have thought also of Cassandra's death-cry, which was sounding in the king's ears as he fell.—For other interpretations, see Appendix.
mvp-comment-114-5
νόστοις
162
ἐν
163
mvp-comment-114-6
κοίταις
164
mvp-comment-114-7
ὅτε οἱ
165
σοι
166
ἀνταία
167
mvp-comment-114-8
γενύων
168
mvp-comment-115-1
δόλος … ἔρος
169
mvp-comment-116-1
δεινὰν δεινῶς
170
δεινὰν … μορφάν
171
mvp-comment-116-2
εἴτ’ οὖν … εἴτε
172
βροτῶν
173
mvp-comment-117-1
πλέον … ἐχθίστα
174
mvp-comment-117-2
δὴ
175
mvp-comment-118-1
νὺξ
176
mvp-comment-118-2
δείπνων
177
mvp-comment-119-1
ἄχθη
178
τοῖς
179
θανάτους
180
mvp-comment-119-2
διδύμαιν χειροῖν
181
διδύμοιν
182
mvp-comment-120-1
εἷλον … πρόδοτον
183
mvp-comment-121-1
οἷς
184
mvp-comment-121-2
Ὀλύμπιος
185
mvp-comment-122-1
ποίνιμα
186
mvp-comment-123-1
ἀγλαΐας
187
mvp-comment-123-2
ἀποναίατο
188
mvp-comment-124-1
πόρσω
189
mvp-comment-125-1
γνώμαν ἴσχεις
190
mvp-comment-125-2
ἐξ οἵων
191
mvp-comment-125-3
τὰ παρόντ’
192
mvp-comment-125-4
οἰκείας
193
mvp-comment-126-1
πολύ … τι κακῶν
194
mvp-comment-126-2
ὑπερεκτήσω
195
mvp-comment-127-1
τὰ δὲ
196
οὐκ ἐριστὰ τοῖς δυνατοῖς
197
πλάθειν
198
mvp-comment-127-2
ἐριστά
199
mvp-comment-127-3
πλάθειν
200
mvp-comment-128-1
δεινοῖς ἠναγκάσθην
201
mvp-comment-129-1
ὀργά
202
ἔξοιδ’
203
mvp-comment-130-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
204
mvp-comment-130-2
ἐν … δεινοῖς
205
mvp-comment-130-3
σχήσω
206
mvp-comment-130-4
ταύτας ἄτας
207
mvp-comment-131-1
ὄφρα
208
mvp-comment-131-2
βίος ἔχῃ με
209
σχήσω
210
mvp-comment-132-1
τίνι γάρ … τίνι φρονοῦντι καίρια
211
ἀκούσαιμ’ ἂν πρόσφορον ἔπος
212
τίνι
213
πρόσφορον
214
mvp-comment-132-2
Other explanations are:—(1) Taking the dative with
πρόσφορον
:—‘To what person who feels aright would that word be suitable which I should hear (=which would be said of me)?’ That is: Should I not deserve to incur a censure from which every right-minded person would shrink? Should I not deserve to be called
δυσσεβής
? This seems forced; and it does not well suit
ἔπος
. (2) Taking the dative with
ἀκούσαιμι
:—‘At whose mouth (=
from whom), that thinks aright, could I hear a suitable word of comfort?’ But such a dative seems impossible. In
Il. 16. 515
δύνασαι δὲ σὺ πάντοσ’ ἀκούειν
|
ἀνέρι κηδομένῳ
, the dat. is one of interest, denoting the person whose prayer is heard (‘
for him’); cp.
Il. 5. 115
κλῦθί μοι
: 24. 335
ἔκλυες ᾧ κ’ ἐθέλῃσθα
.
mvp-comment-133-1
ἄνετε
215
mvp-comment-133-2
ἄλυτα
216
mvp-comment-133-3
κεκλήσεται
217
mvp-comment-133-4
231 f. For
ἐκ
218
mvp-comment-133-5
ἀνάριθμος
219
θρήνων
220
mvp-comment-134-1
ἀλλ’ οὖν
221
γε
222
εὐνοίᾳ
223
mvp-comment-135-1
μάτηρ ὡσεί τις
224
mvp-comment-136-1
μὴ τίκτειν
225
mvp-comment-136-2
ἄταν ἄταις
226
mvp-comment-137-1
καὶ τί μέτρον
227
κακότατος
228
mvp-comment-137-2
φέρε
229
mvp-comment-137-3
ἐπὶ τοῖς φθ.
230
mvp-comment-138-1
ἔβλαστ’
231
mvp-comment-139-1
τούτοις
232
mvp-comment-140-1
εἴ τῳ πρόσκειμαι χρηστῷ
233
mvp-comment-141-1
ξυνναίοιμ’
234
mvp-comment-141-2
εὔκηλος
235
mvp-comment-141-3
γονέων
236
ἐκτίμους
237
mvp-comment-141-4
ἐκτίμους ἵσχουσα
238
mvp-comment-141-5
πτέρυγας … γόων
239
mvp-comment-141-6
ὀξυτόνων
240
mvp-comment-142-1
εἰ γὰρ
241
mvp-comment-142-2
γᾶ
242
mvp-comment-142-3
οὐδὲν
243
ὢν
244
εἰ
245
mvp-comment-142-4
Electra is contrasting her father, whose earthly life has been cut short, with his murderers, who survive. But she believes that his spirit lives in the world below, and will be active in aiding the vengeance (453 ff.).
mvp-comment-142-5
πάλιν
246
mvp-comment-142-6
ἀντιφόνους δίκας
247
mvp-comment-143-1
ἔρροι τ’
248
mvp-comment-143-2
αἰδὼς
249
εὐσέβεια
250
mvp-comment-144-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
251
mvp-comment-144-2
καὶ
252
τὸ σὸν … καὶ τοὐμὸν
253
mvp-comment-145-1
νίκα
254
mvp-comment-145-2
ἅμα
255
mvp-comment-146-1
πολλοῖσι θρήνοις
256
mvp-comment-147-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
257
mvp-comment-148-1
ἥτις εὐγενὴς γυνή
258
mvp-comment-149-1
πατρῷα … πήματα
259
mvp-comment-150-1
κατ’ εὐφρόνην
260
mvp-comment-150-2
θάλλοντα
261
mvp-comment-151-1
ᾗ
262
mvp-comment-151-2
πρῶτα μὲν … εἶτα … ἔπειτα
263
ᾗ
264
mvp-comment-151-3
τὰ μητρὸς
265
mvp-comment-151-4
ἔχθιστα συμβέβηκεν
266
mvp-comment-152-1
κἀκ τῶνδ’ ἄρχομαι
267
mvp-comment-153-1
λαβεῖν … τὸ τητᾶσθαι
268
mvp-comment-154-1
ποίας
269
δοκεῖς
270
mvp-comment-155-1
ἴδω
271
εἰσίδω δ’
272
ἴδω δὲ
273
mvp-comment-155-2
μὲν
274
mvp-comment-156-1
ἐσθήματα
275
mvp-comment-156-2
ἐκείνῳ
276
mvp-comment-156-3
παρεστίους … λοιβάς
277
ἔνθ’ ἐκεῖνον ὤλεσεν
278
mvp-comment-156-4
Acc. to
Homer. Hymn. 29. 4 ff., feasts began and ended with libations to Hestia:
οὐ γὰρ ἄτερ σοῦ
|
εἰλαπίναι θνητοῖσιν, ἵν’ οὐ πρώτῃ πυμάτῃ τε
|
Ἱστίῃ ἀρχόμενος σπένδει μελιηδέα οἶνον
. Soph. fr. 658
<*> πρῷρα λοιβῆς Ἑστία
. Other divinities, including Zeus
σωτήρ
, were similarly honoured; then the paean was sung, and the
πότος
began ( Plat.
Symp.p. 176 A).
mvp-comment-157-1
τούτων
279
mvp-comment-158-1
αὐτοέντην
280
mvp-comment-158-2
Brunck first adopted
αὐτοέντην
281
αὐτοφόντην
282
mvp-comment-158-3
ἡμὶν
283
mvp-comment-159-1
ταλαίνῃ
284
mvp-comment-160-1
ταύτην … τῷδε
285
mvp-comment-161-1
μιάστορι
286
Ἐρινὺν
287
mvp-comment-162-1
ἐγγελῶσα τοῖς ποιουμένοις
288
mvp-comment-163-1
εὑροῦς’
289
τότε
290
mvp-comment-163-2
The conjecture
φρουροῦς’
291
τηροῦς’
292
mvp-comment-164-1
χοροὺς ἵστησι
293
mvp-comment-164-2
μηλοσφαγεῖ … ἱερὰ
294
mvp-comment-164-3
ἔμμην’ ἱερά
295
mvp-comment-164-4
τοῖς σωτηρίοις
296
mvp-comment-164-5
Argive tradition placed Agamemnon's death on the 13th of Gamelion (about the end of January). So said ‘the Argive historians’ (
οἱ Ἀργολικοὶ συγγραφεῖς
),— according to an Argive writer named Deinias, who lived about 225 B.C. (Schol. here: Müller,
Frag. Hist. vol. III. p. 25.) Possibly, then, the idea of Clytaemnestra's hideous festival may have been suggested to the poet by some actual commemoration of the event in Argolis. There was a cult of Agamemnon in various places,—notably in Laconia. (Cp. Roscher's
Lexicon, p. 96.)
mvp-comment-165-1
ἡ δύσμορος
297
κατὰ στέγας
298
mvp-comment-166-1
τέτηκα
299
mvp-comment-166-2
πατρὸς
300
mvp-comment-166-3
The
δαίς
is the feast which, in Homeric fashion (
Il. 1. 467
), would follow the sacrifice (281). Acc. to Eustathius p. 1507. 61 (on
Hom.
Od. 4. 524
ff.),
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαὶς
(or
τράπεζα
) was a proverb
ἐπὶ τῶν ἐπ’ ὀλέθρῳ εὐωχουμένων
. The poet may mean that Clytaemnestra called the festival
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαίς
, in direct allusion to
δεῖπνα ἄρρητα
(203): and this would give a special point to
ἐγγελῶσα
(277). Cp.
Eur.
Or. 1008
τά τ’ ἐπώνυμα δεῖπνα Θυέστου
. But the words do not necessarily imply more than that she called it
Ἀγαμεμνόνεια
.
mvp-comment-167-1
αὐτὴ πρὸς αὑτήν
301
αὑτήν
302
mvp-comment-167-2
κλαῦσαι
303
mvp-comment-167-3
ἡδονὴν φέρει
304
mvp-comment-168-1
ἡ λόγοισι γενναία
305
mvp-comment-169-1
φωνοῦσα
306
mvp-comment-170-1
δύσθεον
307
mvp-comment-170-2
μίσημα
308
mvp-comment-170-3
σοὶ μόνῃ
309
mvp-comment-170-4
τέθνηκεν
310
mvp-comment-170-5
ἐν πένθει
311
mvp-comment-171-1
ἐκ γόων
312
mvp-comment-171-2
οἱ κάτω θεοί
313
mvp-comment-172-1
τάδ’
314
mvp-comment-172-2
ἥξοντ’ Ὀρέστην
315
mvp-comment-173-1
παραστᾶς’
316
mvp-comment-174-1
ἥτις
317
mvp-comment-174-2
ὑπεξέθου
318
mvp-comment-175-1
ἀλλ’ ἴσθι τοι τείσουσά γ’
319
mvp-comment-176-1
ὑλακτεῖ
320
mvp-comment-176-2
σὺν
321
mvp-comment-176-3
πέλας
322
παρών
323
mvp-comment-176-4
301 The adv.
πάντα
324
mvp-comment-176-5
ἄναλκις
325
mvp-comment-176-6
ἡ πᾶσα βλάβη
326
mvp-comment-177-1
σὺν γυναιξὶ
327
mvp-comment-177-2
τὰς μάχας
328
mvp-comment-178-1
ἐφήξειν
329
mvp-comment-179-1
μέλλων … δρᾶν τι
330
mvp-comment-179-2
τὰς οὔσας τε … καὶ τὰς ἀπούσας
331
mvp-comment-179-3
μου
332
μοι
333
mvp-comment-179-4
διέφθορεν
334
mvp-comment-180-1
σωφρονεῖν
335
εὐσεβεῖν
336
mvp-comment-180-2
ἔν τοι κακοῖς
337
mvp-comment-180-3
πολλή )στ’ ἀνάγκη
338
κἀπιτηδεύειν κακά
339
mvp-comment-180-4
I place only a comma, not a colon, after
πάρεστιν
340
mvp-comment-181-1
ὄντος … βεβῶτος
341
mvp-comment-182-1
ἦ κάρτα
342
mvp-comment-182-2
θυραῖον
343
mvp-comment-182-3
οἰχνεῖν
344
mvp-comment-182-4
ἀγροῖσι
345
mvp-comment-182-5
τυγχάνει
346
mvp-comment-183-1
ἦ κἂν … ἱκοίμην
347
ἦ τ<*>ν
348
ἦ δἂν
349
mvp-comment-183-2
ἐς λόγους τοὺς σοὺς ἱκοίμην
350
mvp-comment-184-1
ὡς νῦν
351
ὥς νυν
352
mvp-comment-184-2
ἱστόρει· τί σοι φίλον
353
τό
354
τά
355
mvp-comment-184-3
With the other punctuation,
ἱστόρει τί σοι φίλον
356
mvp-comment-185-1
καὶ δὴ
357
mvp-comment-185-2
τοῦ κασιγνήτου τί φής
358
mvp-comment-185-3
ἥξοντος
359
ἢ μέλλοντος
360
mvp-comment-186-1
φησίν γε
361
mvp-comment-186-2
ποεῖ
362
mvp-comment-187-1
καὶ μὴν ἔγωγ’
363
γε
364
mvp-comment-187-2
οὐκ ὄκνῳ
365
mvp-comment-188-1
ἀρκεῖν
366
mvp-comment-189-1
ἐπεί
367
mvp-comment-189-2
μακρὰν
368
mvp-comment-189-3
324 Here, as in 316,
νῦν
369
νυν
370
mvp-comment-189-4
δόμων
371
φέρουσαν
372
mvp-comment-190-1
ὅμαιμον
373
mvp-comment-190-2
φύσιν
374
mvp-comment-191-1
Χρυσόθεμιν
375
mvp-comment-192-1
οἷα
376
νομίζεται
377
mvp-comment-193-1
πρὸς θυρῶνος ἐξόδοις
378
φωνεῖς
379
ἐλθοῦσα
380
αὖ
381
mvp-comment-193-2
330 For the absence of caesura, cp.
Ph. 101
n.
mvp-comment-194-1
θυμῷ … χαρίζεσθαι
382
mvp-comment-195-1
καίτοι τοσοῦτόν γ’ οἶδα
383
mvp-comment-195-2
κἀμαυτήν, ὅτι
384
mvp-comment-195-3
333 f. For the repeated
ἄν
385
mvp-comment-195-4
οἶ) αὐτοῖς φρονῶ
386
mvp-comment-196-1
ὑφειμένῃ
387
πλεῖν
388
mvp-comment-196-2
For the image, cp.
Eur.
Med. 524
ἄκροισι λαίφους κρασπέδοις
(with close-reefed sails)
ὑπεκφυγεῖν
|
τὴν σὴν στόμαργον, ὦ γύναι, γλωσσαλγίαν
:
Ar.
Ran. 997
ἀλλ’ ὅπως, ὦ γεννάδα
, |
μὴ πρὸς ὀργὴν ἀντιλέξεις
, |
ἀλλὰ συστείλας, ἄκροισι
|
χρώμενος τοῖς ἱστίοις κ.τ.λ.
: and conversely
Soph.
Ant. 715
ναὸς ὅστις ἐγκρατῆ πόδα
|
τείνας ὑπείκει μηδέν
.
Ovid
Epist. 1. 8. 71
moderatius opta, | Et voti, quaeso, contrahe vela tui.
Shakesp.
Henry VI., pt. iii, act 3 sc. 3. 5
‘Now Margaret | Must strike her sail, and learn awhile to serve | Where kings command.’
mvp-comment-197-1
καὶ μὴ δοκεῖν
389
mvp-comment-198-1
τοιαῦτα δ’ ἄλλα
390
ἀλλὰ
391
ἄλλα
392
mvp-comment-199-1
καίτοι τὸ μὲν δίκαιον
393
mvp-comment-199-2
κρίνεις
394
mvp-comment-199-3
εἰ … με δεῖ
395
mvp-comment-199-4
ἐλευθέραν
396
mvp-comment-199-5
ζῆν
397
mvp-comment-199-6
πάντ’
398
mvp-comment-199-7
ἀκουστέα
399
mvp-comment-200-1
δεινόν γε
400
mvp-comment-201-1
τῆς … τικτούσης
401
mvp-comment-201-2
μέλειν
402
mvp-comment-202-1
τἀμὰ νουθετήματα
403
mvp-comment-202-2
κείνης διδακτά
404
mvp-comment-202-3
ἐκ σαυτῆς
405
mvp-comment-203-1
The text, which has been suspected (cr. n.), is sound; but the train of thought is somewhat obscured by compression.
mvp-comment-203-2
‘You forget your father, and care only for your mother. All your counsels to me come from her. Then (
ἔπειτα
),—that being so,—give up the attempt at a compromise. Make a
choice (
ἑλοῦ γε
). You can be imprudent (
φρονεῖν κακῶς
),—as you say that I am,—and loyal to your dead father. Or you can be prudent (
φρονοῦσα
), and forgetful of him,—as you actually are; you who (
ἥτις
) say, indeed, that you would show your hatred of the murderers if you could; and yet, when I
do resist them, you try to turn me from my purpose. You merely add the shame of cowardice to our woes.’
mvp-comment-203-3
ἔπειθ’
406
mvp-comment-203-4
ἑλοῦ γε
407
mvp-comment-203-5
φρονεῖν κακῶς
408
mvp-comment-203-6
Other explanations are:—(1) ‘Choose to be thought either
lost to right feeling, or, if you have such feeling, then at least
forgetful of your duty.’ (2) ‘Choose to seem either
unintelligent (if you are merely the blind instrument of our rulers); or, if you act with clear understanding (
φρονοῦσα
),—thinking to benefit me,—at least forgetful of your father.’ Both these views assume that the question is merely between two interpretations which might be placed on the present conduct of Chrysothemis. But Electra is putting the dilemma between imprudent loyalty and prudent disloyalty.
mvp-comment-204-1
τῶν φίλων
409
mvp-comment-205-1
ἥτις
410
φρονοῦσα
411
μῖσος
412
mvp-comment-206-1
πάντα
413
mvp-comment-206-2
τιμωρουμένης
414
mvp-comment-207-1
οὔτε … τε
415
mvp-comment-207-2
τήν τε δρῶσαν
416
mvp-comment-208-1
πρὸς κακοῖσι
417
mvp-comment-208-2
δειλίαν ἔχει
418
mvp-comment-209-1
ἐπεὶ
419
mvp-comment-209-2
ἢ μάθ’ ἐξ ἐμοῦ
420
mvp-comment-210-1
ἐπαρκούντως
421
mvp-comment-211-1
προσάπτειν
422
mvp-comment-211-2
εἴ τις ἔστ’ ἐκεῖ χάρις
423
mvp-comment-212-1
ἡμὶν
424
ξύνει
425
mvp-comment-213-1
τὰ σὰ … δῶῤ
426
mvp-comment-213-2
ἐφ’ οἶσι
427
mvp-comment-213-3
χλιδᾷς
428
mvp-comment-214-1
ὑπεικάθοιμι
429
mvp-comment-214-2
πλουσία
430
mvp-comment-214-3
περιρρείτω
431
mvp-comment-215-1
τοὐμὲ μὴ λυπεῖν
432
mvp-comment-215-2
Remark the resemblance to the passage where Antigone—summing up her position—compares the
moral pain of neglecting her duty with those penalties which she contemns:—
κείνοις ἂν ἤλγουν· τοῖσδε δ’ οὐκ ἀλγύνομαι
(
Ant. 468
). There, too, we have a Sophoclean triad of clauses, the third echoing the first,—as
τῆς σῆς δ’ οὐκ ἐρῶ τιμῆς τυχεῖν
here reiterates the sense of
σοὶ δὲ πλουσία... βίος
(n. on
Ant. 465
ff.).
mvp-comment-215-3
One of the scholia recognises the traditional reading, and explains it correctly: —
τοῦτο μόνον ἐμὲ βοσκέτω, τὸ μὴ λυπεῖν ἐμὲ αὐτήν, εἰ
(‘as I should do, if’)
τοῖς φονεῦσι τοῦ πατρὸς πείθεσθαι ἀναγκασθήσομαι
.—The conjectures have been numerous: see Appendix.
mvp-comment-216-1
οὐδ’ ἂν σὺ
433
mvp-comment-217-1
παῖδα
434
mvp-comment-217-2
κεκλῆσθαι
435
mvp-comment-218-1
πλείστοις
436
mvp-comment-219-1
μηδὲν
437
πρὸς ὀργὴν
438
mvp-comment-220-1
ἀμφοῖν
439
τοῖς λόγοις
440
mvp-comment-221-1
τῆσδε … αὕτη
441
πάλιν
442
mvp-comment-222-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
443
mvp-comment-222-2
πως
444
mvp-comment-222-3
μύθων
445
mvp-comment-223-1
οὐδ’
446
κοὐδ’
447
ποτέ
448
mvp-comment-224-1
ἰὸν
449
mvp-comment-224-2
σχήσει
450
mvp-comment-225-1
τὸ δεινὸν
451
mvp-comment-225-2
εἰ γὰρ τῶνδέ μοι
452
εἰ
453
mvp-comment-226-1
γὰρ
454
mvp-comment-226-2
γόων
455
λόγων
456
mvp-comment-227-1
ἐνταῦθα
457
mvp-comment-227-2
ἔνθα μή ποτε … προσόψει
458
mvp-comment-227-3
ζῶσα
459
mvp-comment-227-4
κατηρεφεῖ
460
mvp-comment-227-5
χθονὸς τῆσδ’ ἐκτὸς
461
mvp-comment-227-6
ὑμνήσεις
462
mvp-comment-228-1
πρὸς ταῦτα
463
mvp-comment-228-2
Nauck reads
κοὔ
464
καί
465
mvp-comment-228-3
ἐν καλῷ, εὔκαιρον
schol.:
H. 4. 3. 5
νομίσαντες οὐκ ἐν καλῷ εἶναι πρὸς τοὺς ὁπλίτας ἱππομαχεῖν
: so, too,
Eur.
Heracl. 971
, etc. Cp.
καλόν
(
ἐστι
)=
καίριον
in
Soph.
Ph. 1155
; and
εἰς καλόν
=
καιρίως
in
O.T. 78.
mvp-comment-229-1
ἦ ταῦτα δὴ
466
ἦ … δὴ
467
ἦ … γὰρ
468
mvp-comment-229-2
καὶ βεβούλευνται
469
mvp-comment-230-1
ἀλλ’ ἐξίκοιτο
470
mvp-comment-230-2
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκ’
471
mvp-comment-231-1
τίνα … τόνδ’
472
mvp-comment-231-2
τάλαινα
473
mvp-comment-232-1
εἴ τι τῶνδε
474
mvp-comment-233-1
ποῦ ποτ’ εἶ φρενῶν
475
mvp-comment-234-1
ὅπως
476
ὑμῶν
477
mvp-comment-234-2
προσώτατ’
478
προσωτάτω φύγω
479
mvp-comment-235-1
βίου … τοῦ παρόντος
480
mvp-comment-236-1
καλὸς γὰρ
481
mvp-comment-236-2
θαυμάσαι
482
mvp-comment-237-1
τοῖς φίλοις
483
mvp-comment-238-1
εἰκαθεῖν
484
mvp-comment-239-1
ταῦτα
485
οὐκ ἐμοὺς
486
mvp-comment-240-1
γε
487
μέντοι
488
mvp-comment-240-2
μὴ )ξ
489
mvp-comment-240-3
πεσεῖν
490
mvp-comment-240-4
399 A woman, speaking of herself in the plur., uses the masc.:
Ant. 926
παθόντες ἂν ξυγγνοῖμεν ἡμαρτηκότες
.
mvp-comment-241-1
συγγνώμην
491
mvp-comment-242-1
τἄπη
492
mvp-comment-242-2
πρὸς κακῶν
493
mvp-comment-243-1
μή πω
494
mvp-comment-244-1
οἷπερ … ὁδοῦ
495
mvp-comment-245-1
τῷ φέρεις
496
mvp-comment-245-2
ἔμπυρα
497
mvp-comment-246-1
τυμβεῦσαι χοάς
498
mvp-comment-247-1
βροτῶν
499
mvp-comment-248-1
ὃν ἔκταν’ αὐτή
500
ὅν γ’
501
mvp-comment-249-1
τῷ τοῦτ’ ἤρεσεν
502
mvp-comment-250-1
δείματος
503
mvp-comment-250-2
δοκεῖν ἐμοί
504
mvp-comment-251-1
θεοὶ πατρῷοι
505
mvp-comment-251-2
συγγένεσθέ γ’
506
mvp-comment-251-3
ἀλλὰ νῦν
507
mvp-comment-252-1
εἴποιμ’ ἂν τότε
508
mvp-comment-253-1
ἐπὶ σμικρὸν
509
ἐπὶ σμικρῶν
510
mvp-comment-253-2
φράσαι
511
mvp-comment-254-1
σμικροὶ λόγοι
512
mvp-comment-255-1
πατρὸς … δευτέραν ὁμιλίαν
513
mvp-comment-255-2
ἐφέστιον πῆξαι
514
mvp-comment-255-3
This sceptre is described in the
Iliad (2. 101 f.) as the work of Hephaestus, who gave it Zeus; Hermes transmitted it to Pelops, from whom it passed to Atreus and Agamemnon. The Homeric sceptre is often called
χρύσεον
(
Il. 2. 268
, etc.), prob. as being ornamented with gold foil, or studded with gold nails (
Il. 1. 246
χρυσείοις ἥλοισι πεπαρμένον
). Among the objects found at Mycenae are some supposed remains of such sceptres (Schliem.,
Myc. 201, etc.).
mvp-comment-255-4
οὑφόρει ποτέ
515
mvp-comment-256-1
ἔκ τε
516
ἐκ δὲ
517
mvp-comment-256-2
βρύοντα
518
mvp-comment-256-3
ᾧ … γενέσθαι
519
mvp-comment-256-4
The vision resembles that of Astyages, who dreamed that a vine sprang from his daughter Mandanè, the wife of Cambyses,
τὴν δὲ ἄμπελον ἐπισχεῖν τὴν Ἀσίην πᾶσαν
. The
ὀνειροπόλοι
explained this to mean that her son (Cyrus) should reign in his grandfather's stead. (
Her. 1. 108.
) The spreading branches figure also in the dream of Xerxes (7. 19):
ἐδόκεε...ἐστεφανῶσθαι ἐλαίης θαλλῷ, ἀπὸ δὲ τῆς ἐλαίης τοὺς κλάδους γῆν πᾶσαν ἐπισχεῖν
.
mvp-comment-256-5
In choosing the
sceptre of Agamemnon as the stock from which the wondrous growth is put forth, Sophocles may have had in mind the words of Achilles (
Il. 1. 234
ff.);
ναὶ μὰ τόδε σκῆπτρον· τὸ μὲν οὔποτε φύλλα καὶ ὄζους
|
φύσει, ἐπεὶ δὴ πρῶτα τομὴν ἐν ὄρεσσι λέλοιπεν
, |
οὐδ’ ἀναθηλήσει
.
mvp-comment-257-1
του παρόντος
520
τοῦ
521
παρόντος
522
του
523
mvp-comment-257-2
Ἡλίῳ δείκνυσι τοὖναρ
524
mvp-comment-258-1
οὐ κάτοιδα, πλὴν
525
mvp-comment-258-2
πέμπει με κείνη
526
mvp-comment-259-1
These three verses, which the MSS. give to Electra, and which several recent critics reject (cr. n.), clearly belong to Chrysothemis, and are genuine. Electra's exclamation of joy (411) caused Chrysothemis to ask if her sister had any ground for hope (412). Electra replied that, when she had heard the dream, she would say. This showed her sister that Electra relied merely on the fact that Clytaemnestra had seen
some fearful vision. Now, therefore, instead of asking for Electra's interpretation, she merely repeats her counsel (383 f.) before proceeding on her errand. The words
πρός
νυν θεῶν κ.τ.λ.
(428 ff.) show the train of her thought. To Chrysothemis, the alarm of Clytaemnestra (427) is more important than the apparition of Agamemnon. The dream is only a new reason why Electra should be cautious,—not why she should hope.
mvp-comment-259-2
The current ascription of the verses to Electra was doubtless prompted by verse 413. It was supposed that the recital of Chrysothemis must be immediately followed by the comments of Electra. But, as Hermann observed, the phrase
ἀβουλίᾳ πεσεῖν
would alone suffice to show that the verses belong to Chrysothemis (
cp. 398
). Nor could the warning,
σὺν κακῷ μέτει πάλιν
, be fitly uttered by Electra.
mvp-comment-259-3
τῶν ἐγγενῶν
527
mvp-comment-260-1
ἀβουλίᾳ
528
mvp-comment-260-2
σὺν κακῷ
529
mvp-comment-260-3
μέτει
530
mvp-comment-261-1
ἀλλ’
531
mvp-comment-261-2
ὦ φίλη
532
τούτων μὲν
533
mvp-comment-262-1
οὐ … θέμις
534
οὐδ’ ὅσιον
535
mvp-comment-262-2
ἐχθρᾶς ἀπὸ γυναικὸς
536
mvp-comment-262-3
κτερίσματ’
537
mvp-comment-262-4
λουτρὰ
538
mvp-comment-263-1
ἀλλ’ ἢ πνοαῖσιν
539
ῥοαῖσιν
540
mvp-comment-263-2
κρύψον
541
mvp-comment-263-3
νιν
542
mvp-comment-263-4
ἔνθα μή ποτ’
543
ἔνθεν
544
mvp-comment-263-5
εὐνὴν
545
mvp-comment-264-1
ἀλλ’ ὅταν θάῃν
546
mvp-comment-264-2
The conjecture
ἔστ’ ἂν
547
ὅταν
548
σῳζέσθω
549
mvp-comment-264-3
κειμήλἰ
550
mvp-comment-265-1
ἀρχὴν
551
τλημονεστάτη
552
mvp-comment-266-1
ἔβλαστε
553
mvp-comment-267-1
ὅν γ’ … τῷδ’
554
mvp-comment-267-2
ἐπέστεφε
555
mvp-comment-267-3
442 f. The position of
αὐτῇ
556
mvp-comment-267-4
δέξεσθαι
557
mvp-comment-267-5
It seems, then, a reasonable inference that here, where the reference is to future time, he would have written
δέξεσθαι
558
δέξασθαι
559
mvp-comment-267-6
444 ff. Join
θανὼν ἄτιμος
560
mvp-comment-267-7
ἐμασχαλίσθη
561
mvp-comment-267-8
Two different motives are assigned by the Greek commentators; viz.:—(1) the desire to render the dead incapable of wreaking vengeance (
ὥσπερ τὴν δύναμιν ἐκείνων ἀφαιρούμενοι
): (2) the desire to make an atonement (
ἐξιλάσασθαι τὴν δολοφονίαν—ἀφοσιοῦσθαι τὸν φόνον
). There can be little doubt that the first of these motives was the primitive origin of the custom. If the second was afterwards blended with it, the idea may have been that of offering the severed portions to the gods below,—as a victim was devoted to death by cutting off a lock of hair (
Eur.
Alc. 75
). Apollonius Rhodius seems to present the practice in this light (4. 477): Jason, having slain a foe,
ἐξάργματα τάμνε θανόντος
. Cp.
Etym. Magn.:
ἀπάργματα λέγεται τὰ ὑπὸ τῶν τραγῳδῶν λεγόμενα μασχαλίσματα
.
mvp-comment-267-9
κἀπὶ λουτροῖσιν
562
mvp-comment-267-10
ἐξέμαξ ν
563
mvp-comment-267-11
ἆρα μὴ
564
mvp-comment-268-1
οὐκ ἔστιν
565
mvp-comment-268-2
ταῦτα μὲν μέθες· σὺ δὲ
566
mvp-comment-269-1
βοστρύχων ἄκρας φόβας
567
mvp-comment-269-2
κἀμοῦ ταλαίνης
568
mvp-comment-270-1
†ἀλιπαρῆ
569
λιπαρῆ
570
mvp-comment-270-2
We come, therefore, to a dilemma. (1) The words
τήνδ’ ἀλιπαρῆ τρίχα
may conceal some corruption:
τήνδ’
ought possibly to be
τήνδε τ’
571
ἀλίπαρον
572
mvp-comment-270-3
(2) Or else, if the text be sound,
ἀλιπαρῆ
may mean
οὐ λιπαράν
. There is no doubt that
λιπ
, ‘fat,’ is the root both of
λι^παρός
, ‘shining,’ and of
λι—παρής
, ‘sticking’; cp.
Plat.
Crat. 427 B
τὸ λιπαρὸν καὶ τὸ κολλῶδες
(
Curt.
Etym. § 340
). Similarly
γλίσχρος
, ‘sticky,’ came to mean ‘importunate.’ It is barely possible that, in coining a new negative compound, the poet may have transferred the sense of
λιπαρός
to
λιπαρής
: but it seems improbable.
mvp-comment-271-1
ζῶμα
573
mvp-comment-271-2
χλιδαῖς
574
mvp-comment-272-1
προσπίτνουσα
575
αὐτὸν
576
mvp-comment-273-1
ἐξ ὑπερτέρας χερός
577
mvp-comment-273-2
ζῶντ’
578
mvp-comment-274-1
ἀφνεωτέραις
579
mvp-comment-274-2
στέφωμεν
580
mvp-comment-274-3
δωρούμεθα
581
mvp-comment-275-1
οἶμαι μὲν οὖν
582
mvp-comment-275-2
If
μέλον
583
μέλειν
584
μέλον
585
mvp-comment-276-1
σοί
586
mvp-comment-277-1
βροτῶν
587
mvp-comment-278-1
πρὸς εὐσέβειαν
588
mvp-comment-279-1
δράσω
589
mvp-comment-279-2
τὸ γὰρ δίκαιον
590
mvp-comment-279-3
(1)
τὸ δίκαιον
is an acc. of general reference, and
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
is impersonal. ‘With regard to what is (clearly) right, it is unreasonable for two persons to dispute; rather both should hasten on the doing (of it).’ With
ἀλλ’ ἐπισπεύδειν
we supply the notion
δεῖ
from the negative
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
(as from
οὐκ ἔξεστι
in
O. C. 1402
ff.; cp.
O. T. 817
ff.). For the form of the sentence, cp.
H. 7. 3. 7
τοὺς περὶ Ἀρχίαν...οὐ ψῆφον ἀνεμείνατε, ἀλλὰ ὁπότε πρῶτον ἐδυνάσθητε ἐτιμωρήσασθε
. So here the acc.
τὸ δίκαιον
, which represents the object of
δρᾶν
, is separated from it by the parenthesis
οὐκ
ἔχει λόγον δυοῖν ἐρίζειν
. (The first scholium gives substantially this view:
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον φιλονεικεῖν περὶ τοῦ δικαίου, ὥστε περὶ αὐτοῦ δύο ὄντας ἐρίζειν
.)
mvp-comment-279-4
(2) Or
τὸ δίκαιον
might be nom.: ‘that which is clearly right does not
afford any ground (
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
) for two persons to dispute,’ etc. So the second schol.:
ἢ τὸ οὐκ ἔχει λόγον ἀντὶ τοῦ οὐ παρέχει πρόφασιν
. So far as the verb
ἔχει
is concerned, this sense is quite admissible: cp.
Thuc. 2. 41
οὔτε τῷ πολεμίῳ ἐπελθόντι ἀγανάκτησιν ἔχει
(
ἡ πόλις
). The objection is that the phrases
ἔχειν λόγον, οὐκ ἔχειν λόγον
, which are very common, regularly mean, ‘to be reasonable,’ ‘to be unreasonable.’ This is so both in the personal and in the impersonal constr.; as Plat.
Phaedop. 62 D
τὸ γὰρ μὴ ἀγανακτεῖν...οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
:
Dem. or. 36 § 54
πῶς ἔχει λόγον σὲ...δίκην ἀξιοῦν λαμβάνειν
; The supposed sense, ‘not to
afford a reason,’ is unexampled.
mvp-comment-279-5
δυοῖν
591
mvp-comment-280-1
παρ’ ὑμῶν
592
mvp-comment-281-1
πικρὰν
593
δοκῶ με … τολμήσειν
594
ἔτι
595
mvp-comment-282-1
εἰ μὴ )γὼ
596
mvp-comment-282-2
γνώμας λειπομένα
597
mvp-comment-283-1
ἁ πρόμαντις Δίκα
598
mvp-comment-283-2
δίκαια φερομένα χεροῖν κράτη
599
mvp-comment-284-1
μέτεισιν
600
mvp-comment-284-2
οὐ μακροῦ χρόνου
601
mvp-comment-285-1
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
602
κλύουσαν
603
mvp-comment-285-2
ἁδυπνόων … ὀνειράτων
604
mvp-comment-286-1
ἀμναστεῖ γ’ ὁ φύσας ς’
605
mvp-comment-287-1
χαλκόπλακτος
606
mvp-comment-287-2
γένυς
607
mvp-comment-287-3
The very axe (
φόνιος πέλεκυς
, 99) with which the blow was dealt is imagined as nourishing a grudge against the murderers who had set it such a task. Such a personification recalls that practice of Athenian law by which inanimate objects which had caused death were brought to a formal trial in the court called
τὸ ἐπὶ Πρυτανείῳ
, and, after sentence, cast beyond the boundaries, in the presence of the Archon Basileus and the sacrificial officers of the tribes (
φυλο‐
βασιλεῖς
). Aeschin. or. 3 § 244
τὰ μὲν ξύλα καὶ τοὺς λίθους καὶ τὸν σίδηρον, τὰ ἄφωνα καὶ ἀγνώμονα, ἐάν τῳ ἐμπεσόντα ἀποκτείνῃ, ὑπερορίζομεν
. (Cp.
Dem. or. 23 § 76
.) A like conception was implied in the English law (repealed in 1846) of ‘deodands’ (Deo danda),
i.e., personal chattels (whether animals or things) which, having caused the death of a human being, were forfeited to the Crown for pious uses.
mvp-comment-288-1
ἐν αἰκίαις
608
mvp-comment-289-1
καὶ πολύπους καὶ πολύχειρ
609
mvp-comment-290-1
λόχοις
610
mvp-comment-290-2
χαλκόπους
611
mvp-comment-291-1
ἄλεκτρ’ ἄνυμφα
612
mvp-comment-291-2
γάμων ἁμιλλήμαθ’
613
mvp-comment-291-3
ἐπέβα
614
mvp-comment-292-1
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι … συνδρῶσιν
615
mvp-comment-292-2
Verses 495—497 (
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι...τέρας
) answer metrically to vv. 479—481
ὕπεστί μοι...ὀνειράτων
, where the text is certain, save for the doubt whether
θράσος
or
θάρσος
should stand in 479. Here we must first decide two points.
mvp-comment-292-3
(1) Are the words
πρὸ τῶνδε
616
mvp-comment-292-4
(2) Could
ἔχει με, μήποτε τέρας πελᾶν
(etc.) mean, ‘
the belief possesses me, that’ etc.? Surely not. No real parallel for so strange a phrase has been produced. It is irrelevant to quote those impersonal verbs which directly express the
occurrence of a thought to the mind; as
Xen.
An. 6. 1. 17
εἰσῄει αὐτοὺς ὅπως ἂν καὶ ἔχοντές τι οἴκαδε ἀφίκοιντο
(‘the thought came to them, how they might,’ etc.):
Thuc. 6. 78.
§ 1
εἰ δέ τῳ ἄρα παρέστηκε, τὸν μὲν Συρακόσιον...πολέμιον εἶναι κ.τ.λ.
Either, then, the subject to
ἔχει
has dropped out, or the words
μ’ ἔχει
conceal a corruption.
mvp-comment-292-5
The following remedies are possible: I incline to the first, as involving least change. (1) Reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
, we may read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοί μ’ ἔχει
|
<θάρσος τι>, μήποθ’ ἡμῖν
etc. (It may be remarked that
τι
is in harmony with the tone of
ὕπεστί μοι
in 479.) Another available word is
ξύννοια
(cp.
Ant. 279
). (2) Or, reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θάρσος
, we could read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι θάρσος ἴσχει με
. On either view, the
υ
of
ἁδυπνόων
in 480 is long (as several critics have assumed). It should be noted that (1) involves a different constitution of the verses: see p. lxxxii.
mvp-comment-292-6
In those MSS. which have
μή ποτε μή ποθ’ ἡμῖν
617
mvp-comment-293-1
ἀψεγές
618
ἀψεφές
619
mvp-comment-293-2
πελᾶν
620
mvp-comment-294-1
τοῖς δρῶσι
621
τοῖς συνδρῶσιν
622
mvp-comment-295-1
μαντεῖαι βροτῶν
623
mvp-comment-296-1
εὖ κατασχήσει
624
mvp-comment-297-1
ἱππεία
625
mvp-comment-297-2
Oenomaüs, king of Pisa in Elis, had promised the hand of his daughter Hippodameia to the suitor who should defeat him in a chariot-race; the penalty of failure being death. The young Pelops, son of Tantalus, offered himself as a competitor. Myrtilus, the charioteer of Oenomaüs, was persuaded (either by Hippodameia or by Pelops) to betray his master. He did so by leaving out one or both of the linch-pins by which the naves of the chariot-wheels were secured to the axles.
Tzetzes on Lycophron 156
ταῖς χοινίκισι
(=
πλήμναις
, the naves)
τῶν τροχῶν οὐκ ἐμβαλὼν τοὺς ἥλους
. According to another story, he substituted a linch-pin of wax for a real one (
schol. Apoll. Rh. 752
ἐμβαλόντα κήρινον ἔμβολον ἐπὶ τοῦ ἀκραξονίου
). So Pelops won the race, and the bride. But Oenomaüs was soon avenged on the traitor; for Myrtilus insulted Hippodameia, and was thrown into the sea by Pelops; upon whose house he invoked a curse, as he sank.
mvp-comment-297-3
Euripides, too, (
Or. 990
ff.,
Helen. 386 f.) refers to this chariot-race as the event with which the troubles of the Pelopidae began. Apollonius Rhodius briefly describes the critical moment of the race as one of the subjects embroidered on the cloak of Jason (1. 752 ff.); there Oenomaüs was seen, ‘falling sideways, as the axle broke at the naves of the wheels,’—
ἄξονος ἐν πλήμνῃσι παρακλιδὸν ἀγνυμένοιο
|
πίπτεν
.
mvp-comment-297-4
The eastern pediment of the temple of Zeus at Olympia (
circ. 450 B.C.) was adorned with sculptures by Paeonius, representing the preparation for this contest (
Paus. 5. 10. 6
). The fragments found on the site have sufficed for a reconstruction of the group. Zeus occupied the centre; to the right of him were Pelops and Hippodameia; to the left, Oenomaüs and his wife Steropè. On each side was a chariot drawn by four horses. Myrtilus was sitting in front of his team, with his face turned away from his master.
mvp-comment-297-5
In the older and nobler form of the myth, Pelops won, not by a fraud, but by the grace of Poseidon, who gave him winged horses (Pindar
O. 1. 87
ἔδωκεν δίφρον τε χούσεον πτεροῖσίν τ’ ἀκάμαντας ἵππους
). On the chest (
λάρναξ
) of Cypselus, seen by Pausanias in the Heraeum at Olympia (
Paus. 5. 17. 5
), Pelops was driving two winged horses.
mvp-comment-298-1
αἰανὴς
626
mvp-comment-298-2
The form
αἰανὴς
has the best authority, and some critics hold that
αἰανὸς
(Hesych.) was a Byzantine invention. But in
Aesch.
Eum. 416
,
ἡμεῖς γάρ ἐσμεν νυκτὸς αἰανῆς τέκνα
(so L, schol., and Tzetzes on Lycophron 406),
αἰανῆ
is far less suitable.
mvp-comment-299-1
εὖτε
627
mvp-comment-299-2
ὁ ποντισθεὶς Μυρτίλος
628
mvp-comment-299-3
A vase found at Capua shows Pelops and Hippodameia in a ship, from which Myrtilus is falling backwards into the water. A winged Erinys hovers in the air above, brandishing a sword over the head of Pelops (Baumeister,
Denkmäler p. 1204, referring to
Mon. Inst. x. 25).
mvp-comment-299-4
ἐκοιμάθη
629
mvp-comment-300-1
παγχρυσέων δίφρων
630
mvp-comment-301-1
πρόρριζος
631
mvp-comment-301-2
ἐκριφθείς
632
mvp-comment-302-1
ἔλειπεν
633
ἔλιπεν
634
οἴκου
635
οἴκους
636
πω
637
mvp-comment-303-1
πολύπονος
638
αἰκία
639
mvp-comment-304-1
ἀνειμένη
640
μέν
641
mvp-comment-304-2
ὡς ἔοικας
642
mvp-comment-304-3
στρέφει
643
mvp-comment-304-4
Clytaemnestra begins in the same strain as Chrysothemis, who likewise emphasised her reproof by the word
αὖ
644
mvp-comment-305-1
μή τοι θυραίαν γ’
645
mvp-comment-305-2
αἰσχύνειν φίλους
646
mvp-comment-306-1
καίτοι
647
mvp-comment-306-2
δὴ
648
πολλούς
649
mvp-comment-306-3
ἐξεῖπάς με … ὡς
650
mvp-comment-306-4
θρασεῖα
651
τραχεῖα
652
mvp-comment-306-5
ἄρχω
653
mvp-comment-307-1
ὕβριν … οὐκ ἔχω
654
κακῶς κλύουσα
655
mvp-comment-308-1
πατὴρ γάρ
656
mvp-comment-308-2
πρόσχημα
657
mvp-comment-309-1
ἡ γὰρ Δίκη
658
mvp-comment-310-1
ᾗ χρῆν σ’ ἀρήγειν
659
mvp-comment-311-1
The order of words in the MSS.,
ἐπεὶ πατὴρ οὗτος σός
, is probably right; the words would then fall from her with a certain deliberate bitterness.
Cp. 542
:
Ant. 44
ἦ γὰρ νοεῖς θάπτειν σθ’
(n.):
Ph. 101
λέγω σ’ ἐγὼ δόλῳ Φιλοκτήτην λαβεῖν
.
mvp-comment-312-1
μοῦνος
660
Ἑλλήνων
661
mvp-comment-312-2
Nauck requires
τὴν αὐτὸς αὑτοῦ
instead of
τὴν σὴν ὅμαιμον
, because Agamemnon's unique crime was the slaughter of his own child: as if the text did not convey this. Clytaemnestra means, ‘while mourning a father, you forget a sister.’
mvp-comment-312-3
532 f. The regular mode of expression would be,
οὐκ ἴσον λύπης καμὼν ἐμοί, ὁ σπείρας τῇ τικτούσῃ
. But, having written
ὅτ’ ἔσπειρε
, the poet explains
ἐμοί
by repeating the comparison in a new form,
ὥσπερ ἡ τίκτουσ’ ἐγώ
. (For
ὡς
or
ὥσπερ
after
ἴσος
, cp.
Lys. or. 19 § 36
ἡγοῦντο... τὰ ἐκεῖ...εἶναι ἴσα ὥσπερ τὰ ἐνθάδε
.) Those who reject v. 533 omit to notice that, without it, the words
οὐκ ἴσον καμὼν ἐμοί
would be unintelligible. Cp.
Aesch.
Ag. 1417
ἔθυσεν αὑτοῦ παῖδα, φιλτάτην ἐμοὶ
|
ὠδῖν’
.
mvp-comment-312-4
This assertion of the mother's superior claim is a counterpart to the doctrine of Athena in
Aesch.
Eum. 658
f.,
οὐκ ἔστι μήτηρ ἡ κεκλημένου τέκνου
|
τοκεύς, τροφὸς δὲ κύματος νεοσπόρου
. Cp. above,
Aesch. Eum. 366
n.
mvp-comment-313-1
τοῦ χάριν, τίνων
662
mvp-comment-313-2
The alternative, which most editors have preferred, is to take
τίνων
as the participle. But there is an insuperable objection to this, which seems to have escaped notice. The words,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could mean only, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
for what?’ They could not mean, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
to whom?’ The latter would be
τῷ χάριν τίνων
; See (
e.g.)
Aesch.
P. V. 985
καὶ μὴν ὀφείλων ἂν τίνοιμ’ αὐτῷ χάριν
:
Aesch.
Ag. 821
τούτων θεοῖσι χρὴ πολύμνηστον χάριν
|
τίνειν
. Hence the question,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could not possibly be answered by
Ἀργείων
. For, evidently, the latter word could not mean, (‘for a benefit conferred by) the Greeks.’ A scholiast in the Baroccian MS. (cr. n. on 545), who explains
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
by
τίνος χάριν ἀποδιδούς
, plainly meant, ‘showing gratitude for what?’—and his paraphrase was correct; only he overlooked the context.
mvp-comment-314-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ μετῆν
663
mvp-comment-315-1
ἀλλ’ ἀντ’ ἀδελφοῦ δῆτα
664
κτανὼν
665
mvp-comment-315-2
ἀντὶ ἀδελφοῦ
666
mvp-comment-315-3
τἄμ’
667
mvp-comment-316-1
παῖδες … διπλοῖ
668
mvp-comment-316-2
540 f. Nauck would prefer a single verse in place of these two, viz.
οὓς Ἰφιγενείας εἰκὸς ἦν θνῄσκειν πάρος
.
mvp-comment-317-1
ἢ
669
mvp-comment-317-2
ἢ τῶν ἐμῶν Ἅιδης
670
mvp-comment-318-1
δαίσασθαι
671
mvp-comment-318-2
The conj.
λῄσασθαι
672
mvp-comment-319-1
πανώλει
673
mvp-comment-319-2
παρεῖτο
674
mvp-comment-319-3
The sense does not absolutely require us to take
Μενέλεω δ’
675
mvp-comment-320-1
ἀβούλου
676
mvp-comment-320-2
κακοῦ γνώμην
677
mvp-comment-321-1
δοκῶ μέν
678
mvp-comment-321-2
εἰ καὶ
679
mvp-comment-322-1
εἰ φωνὴν λάβοι
680
mvp-comment-323-1
τοῖς πεπραγμένοις
681
mvp-comment-324-1
γνώμην δικαίαν σχοῦσα
682
mvp-comment-325-1
ἐρεῖς μὲν οὐχὶ
683
ἐρεῖς
684
ἐρεῖς … μ’ ὡς
685
mvp-comment-325-2
ἄρξασά τι λυπηρὸν
686
mvp-comment-325-3
τάδ’ ἐξήκους’
687
mvp-comment-326-1
τοῦ τεθνηκότος θ’ ὕπερ
688
mvp-comment-327-1
καὶ μὴν
689
mvp-comment-327-2
λόγους ἐξῆρχές με
690
mvp-comment-328-1
Clytaemnestra has argued that she was justified in slaying Agamemnon, because he had slain Iphigeneia. The topics of Electra's reply are as follows.
mvp-comment-328-2
(1) 558—562. The wife who slew her husband would be a criminal, even if the motive had been just retribution; but the real motive was her love for Aegisthus. (2) 563—576. Agamemnon was not a free agent in slaying Iphigeneia; the act was forced upon him by Artemis. (3) 577—583. Suppose, however, that he was a free agent, and wished to please his brother; still she was not justified in taking his life. (4) 584—594. And in any case her plea does not excuse her for living with the man who helped to slay her husband.—The speech then closes in a strain of reproach and defiance (595 —609).
mvp-comment-328-3
καὶ δὴ λέγω σοι
691
πατέρα
692
φὴς
693
mvp-comment-329-1
εἴτ’ οὖν … εἴτε
694
mvp-comment-329-2
λέξω
695
δείξω
696
mvp-comment-330-1
ὡς οὐ δίκῃ γ’
697
ἔσπασεν
698
πειθὼ
699
mvp-comment-331-1
κυναγὸν
700
mvp-comment-331-2
ποινὰς
701
mvp-comment-331-3
τὰ πολλὰ πνεύματ’ ἔσχ’
702
τὰ πολλὰ
703
ἔσχε
704
mvp-comment-331-4
Acc. to Aesch. (
Aesch.
Ag. 149
f.,
Aesch. Ag. 192
), the Greeks were detained by
adverse winds, blowing from the N.E. : and this seems to have been the account given in the
Cypria (
c. 776 B.C.), Proclus
Chrest. p. 455:
ἐπέσχεν αὐτοὺς τοῦ πλοῦ χειμῶνας ἐπιπέμπουσα
. But other authorities speak of a
calm. Thus
I. A. 9 ff.
οὔκουν φθόγγος γ’ οὔτ’ ὀρνίθων
|
οὔτε θαλάσσης· σιγαὶ δ’ ἀνέμων
|
τόνδε κατ’ Εὔριπον ἔχουσιν
. Schol.
Eur.
Or. 647
ἐπειράθη τῆς θεοῦ ὀργιζομένης καὶ κατεχούσης τοὺς ἀνέμους
. Tzetzes on Lycophron 183
χολωθεῖσα δ’ ἐπὶ τούτῳ ἡ θεὸς τοὺς ἀνέμους κατέσχεν
. Ovid (
Met. 13. 183
) combines both versions:
exspectata diu, nulla aut contraria classi | Flamina sunt.
mvp-comment-331-5
It has been objected that vessels provided with oars need not have been detained by a calm. But the ships of the Greek fleet were not light craft. Each carried from 50 to 120 armed men, besides
σκεύη πολεμικά
: and the warriors were also the rowers (cp.
Thuc. 1. 10
). It is intelligible, then, that they should await the aid of wind before attempting the passage of the Aegaean. We must remember, too, the strong and shifting currents in the Euripus (
στονόεντα πορθμόν
,
Soph.
Ant. 1145
:
παλιρρόχθοις ἐν Αὐλίδος τόποις
,
Aesch.
Ag. 191
).
mvp-comment-331-6
We cannot well render:—(1)‘He
suffered those tedious winds,’—supplying
ὁ πατήρ
from v. 558. Nor: (2) ‘She
directed those tedious winds at Aulis,’—a version which would at least require
ἐπ’ Αὐλίδι
. Cp.
Ph. 1119
ἔχε
|
δύσποτμον ἀρὰν ἐπ’ ἄλλοις
.
mvp-comment-331-7
The conjecture
πλοῖα
705
mvp-comment-331-8
Αὐλίδι
706
mvp-comment-332-1
ἢ )γὼ φράσω
707
κείνης
708
mvp-comment-333-1
ὡς ἐγὼ κλύω
709
mvp-comment-333-2
θεᾶς … κατ’ ἄλσος
710
mvp-comment-333-3
παίζων
711
mvp-comment-333-4
ποδοῖν
712
mvp-comment-334-1
ἔλαφον
713
mvp-comment-334-2
στικτὸν
714
mvp-comment-334-3
κεράστην
715
mvp-comment-334-4
οὗ κατὰ σφαγὰς
716
mvp-comment-335-1
ἐκκομπάσας ἔπος τι τυγχάνει
717
βαλών
718
mvp-comment-335-2
This is the reason against taking
τυγχάνει
with
βαλών
, as=‘he shoots and hits’; cp.
Il. 15. 581
θηρητὴρ ἐτύχησε βαλών
:
Her. 3. 35
εἰ...τοῦ παιδὸς...βαλὼν τύχοιμι
. The vaunt must then
precede the hit.
mvp-comment-335-3
Others take
βαλὼν
719
ἔπος
720
mvp-comment-335-4
Monk, with Musgrave, took
σφαγὰς
721
mvp-comment-336-1
ἐκ τοῦδε
722
mvp-comment-336-2
μηνίσασα
723
mvp-comment-336-3
Λητῴα κόρη
724
mvp-comment-337-1
ὡς
725
ἀντίσταθμον
726
mvp-comment-337-2
ἐκθύσειε
727
mvp-comment-338-1
ὧδ’ ἦν
728
mvp-comment-338-2
τὰ … θύματ’
729
mvp-comment-338-3
λύσις
730
mvp-comment-338-4
πρὸς οἶκον
731
mvp-comment-339-1
πολλὰ
732
mvp-comment-339-2
ἀντιβὰς
733
mvp-comment-339-3
μόλις
734
mvp-comment-340-1
εἰ δ’ οὖν
735
mvp-comment-340-2
ἐρῶ γὰρ καὶ τὸ σόν
736
mvp-comment-341-1
τούτου … οὕνεκ’
737
mvp-comment-341-2
νόμῳ
738
mvp-comment-342-1
ὅρα
739
μὴ … τιθῇς
740
τίθης
741
mvp-comment-342-2
Here, either
τίθης
or
τιθῇς
would be suitable. (1) With
τίθης
:—‘See that, in making this rule, you
are not making woe for yourself.’ This means that to make the rule (as she is doing) is at once (logically) to make the woe. (2) With
τιθῇς
: —‘See
lest, in making this rule, you
make woe for yourself’:
i.e., the rule may have the woe as a consequence. The woe is a future contingency (583
εἰ δίκης γε τυγχάνοις
), against which Electra warns her. On the whole, I now prefer
τιθῇς
.
Cp. 1003
ὅρα κακῶς πράσσοντε μὴ μείζω κακὰ
|
κτησώμεθ’
: fr. 82
ἀλλ’ ὅρα μὴ κρεῖσσον ᾖ
.
mvp-comment-342-3
τιθεῖσα … νόμον
742
mvp-comment-343-1
εἰ γὰρ κτενοῦμεν
743
mvp-comment-343-2
πρώτη
744
mvp-comment-344-1
εἰσόρα
745
mvp-comment-344-2
οὐκ οὖσαν
746
mvp-comment-344-3
τίθης
747
mvp-comment-344-4
εἰ … θέλεις
748
mvp-comment-345-1
τῷ παλαμναίῳ
749
mvp-comment-345-2
πρόσθεν ἐξαπώλεσας
750
mvp-comment-346-1
παιδοποιεῖς
751
mvp-comment-346-2
Erigonè, daughter of Aegisthus and Clytaemnestra (Tzetzes on
Lyc. 1374
), was mentioned by the early cyclic poet Cinaethon (
Paus. 2. 18. 6
), and was the theme of Sophocles in his
Ἠριγόνη
. Hyginus (
Hyg.
Fab. 122
) notices a son of Aegisthus named Aletes, who gives his name to a play by Sophocles, but does not record the mother: see p. xliii note 4.
mvp-comment-346-3
εὐσεβεῖς
752
mvp-comment-346-4
κἀξ εὐσεβῶν
753
mvp-comment-346-5
By
τοὺς...πρόσθεν εὐσεβεῖς
Electra means Orestes and herself. Both are ‘cast out’ of their just rights. Cp.
O.T. 611
φίλον ...ἐσθλὸν ἐκβαλεῖν
.
Eur.
El. 62
τεκοῦσα δ’ ἄλλους παῖδας Αἰγίσθῳ πάρα
|
πάρεργ’ Ὀρέστην κἀμὲ ποιεῖται δόμων.
mvp-comment-346-6
βλαστόντας
754
mvp-comment-346-7
ἐκβαλοῦσ’ ἔχεις
755
mvp-comment-347-1
πῶς ταῦτ’ ἐπαινέσαιμ’ ἄν
756
mvp-comment-347-2
ἢ
757
ἦ
758
καὶ τοῦτ’
759
ἄποινα
760
mvp-comment-348-1
αἰσχρῶς δ’
761
δ’
762
mvp-comment-348-2
ἐάν περ καὶ λέγῃς
763
mvp-comment-348-3
ἐχθροῖς γαμεῖσθαι
764
mvp-comment-348-4
These two verses, though not indispensable, seem genuine. Were they omitted, the transition from 592 to 595 would be somewhat abrupt.
mvp-comment-349-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ γὰρ
765
mvp-comment-349-2
πᾶσαν ἵης γλῶσσαν
766
mvp-comment-350-1
κακοστομοῦμεν
767
mvp-comment-350-2
καί σ’ ἔγωγε δεσπότιν
768
mvp-comment-350-3
εἰς ἡμᾶς
769
ἣ
770
mvp-comment-351-1
βίον μοχθηρόν
771
mvp-comment-351-2
ἔκ τε σοῦ
772
κακοῖς … ξυνοῦσα
773
mvp-comment-351-3
συννόμου
774
mvp-comment-352-1
ὁ δ’ ἄλλος
775
mvp-comment-352-2
χεῖρα σὴν
776
mvp-comment-352-3
τρίβει βίον
777
mvp-comment-352-4
603 The reason for writing
δή με σοὶ
778
δή μέ σοι
779
mvp-comment-352-5
μιάστορα
780
mvp-comment-353-1
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκα
781
mvp-comment-354-1
εἰς ἅπαντας
782
mvp-comment-354-2
χρῇς
783
mvp-comment-354-3
στόμαργον
784
mvp-comment-355-1
τῶνδε τῶν ἔ|ργων ἴδρις
785
mvp-comment-355-2
σχεδόν τι
786
mvp-comment-355-3
οὐ καταισχύνω
787
mvp-comment-356-1
ὁρῶ μένος πνέουσαν
788
μένος πνέουσαν
789
mvp-comment-356-2
σὺν δίκῃ ξύνεστι
790
mvp-comment-356-3
Other interpretations are:—(1) ‘I see that Electra is wroth; but as to whether she is in the right, I see no concern (anywhere),’—a timid way of saying that
Clytaemnestra shows no such concern. So the schol. (2) ‘I see that Clytaemnestra is angry, but not that she cares whether she is right’:—an inference from some gesture. Both these versions rely on the fact that
φροντίδος
(612) is plainly an echo of
φροντίδ’
(611). But: (
a) it does not follow that
φροντίδ’
is not
Electra's thought. (
b) It is surely clear that
πνέουσαν
must be Electra; and (
c) as in
Ant. 471
f., the second clause naturally refers to the same person.
mvp-comment-357-1
ποίας δ’ ἐμοὶ δεῖ
791
ἐμοὶ
792
μοι
793
δεῖ
794
mvp-comment-357-2
Others understand: (1) ‘If Electra has no consideration for justice, why should I have any consideration for her,—
i.e., show her any tenderness?’ Or: (2) ‘If she heeds not justice, why should I heed her?’ Neither view seems well suited to the context.
mvp-comment-358-1
καὶ ταῦτα
795
mvp-comment-358-2
τηλικοῦτος
796
mvp-comment-358-3
ἆρα
797
mvp-comment-358-4
χωρεῖν ἂν
798
εἰς πᾶν ἔργον
799
mvp-comment-359-1
εὖ νυν ἐπίστω
800
mvp-comment-359-2
ἔξωρα
801
mvp-comment-359-3
προσεικότα
802
mvp-comment-360-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
803
mvp-comment-360-2
ἡ … ἐκ σοῦ δυσμένεια
804
mvp-comment-360-3
ἐξαναγκάζει
805
αἰσχροῖς
806
mvp-comment-360-4
622 f. The word
θρέμμα
807
mvp-comment-360-5
ἦ σ’ ἐγὼ
808
mvp-comment-361-1
νιν
809
mvp-comment-361-2
εὑρίσκεται
810
mvp-comment-361-3
Cp. Milton,
Apology for Smectymnuus (in his
Prose Works, ed. Symmons, vol. I. p. 236): ‘I might also tell them [the prelates], what Electra in Sophocles, a wise virgin, answered her wicked mother, who thought herself too violently reproved by her the daughter: ‘'
Tis you that say it,
not I; you do the deeds, |
And your ungodly deeds find me the words.’’
mvp-comment-362-1
οὐ μὰ
811
mvp-comment-362-2
δέσποιναν
812
mvp-comment-362-3
Ἄρτεμιν
813
mvp-comment-362-4
θράσους τοῦδ’ οὐκ ἀλύξεις
814
μόλῃ
815
mvp-comment-363-1
ὁρᾷς
816
mvp-comment-363-2
ἐκφέρει
817
mvp-comment-363-3
The
v. l.
παρεῖσα
818
mvp-comment-364-1
οὐδὲ
819
mvp-comment-364-2
ὑπ’ εὐφήμου βοῆς
820
mvp-comment-364-3
ἐπειδὴ σοί γ’
821
mvp-comment-364-4
πᾶν λέγειν
822
mvp-comment-365-1
κελεύω
823
mvp-comment-365-2
τοὐμὸν στόμ’
824
mvp-comment-365-3
634 f. An altar, and probably an image, of Apollo stand before the palace. The attendant of Clytaemnestra carries offerings of various fruits, which she is now commanded to
raise, as with a gesture of solemn oblation (
ἔπαιρε
825
mvp-comment-365-4
ἡ παροῦσά μοι
826
mvp-comment-365-5
θύματα … πάγκαρπα
827
mvp-comment-366-1
λυτηρίους … δειμάτων
828
mvp-comment-366-2
ἀνάσχω
829
mvp-comment-367-1
κλύοις ἂν
830
mvp-comment-367-2
προστατήριε
831
mvp-comment-368-1
κεκρυμμένην
832
mvp-comment-368-2
οὐ γὰρ ἐν φίλοις
833
mvp-comment-369-1
πρὸς φῶς
834
mvp-comment-370-1
πολυγλώσσῳ
835
mvp-comment-370-2
σπείρῃ
836
mvp-comment-370-3
ματαίαν
837
mvp-comment-371-1
ὧδ’
838
mvp-comment-372-1
γὰρ
839
mvp-comment-372-2
δισσῶν ὀνείρων
840
mvp-comment-372-3
Jacobs Fr.(
ap. Wunder) understood, ‘
two dreams,’—as if Clyt.'s vision consisted of two parts,—the return of Agamemnon, and the growth from the sceptre (417—423). This seems forced. Still less can we assume that there was some second dream which Clyt. did not relate even to the Sun-god (425).
mvp-comment-372-4
Λύκεἰ ἄναξ
841
mvp-comment-373-1
ἐσθλά … ἐχθρά
842
mvp-comment-373-2
Cp.
Aesch.
Pers. 217
, where the Chorus are advising Atossa how to propitiate the gods after her dream:
εἴ τι φλαῦρον εἶδες, αἰτοῦ τῶνδ’ ἀποτροπὴν τελεῖν
, |
τὰ δ’ ἀγάθ’ ἐκτελῆ γενέσθαι σοί τε καὶ τέκνῳ σέθεν κ.τ.λ.
mvp-comment-373-3
ἔμπαλιν μέθες
843
mvp-comment-374-1
εἴ τινες
844
mvp-comment-375-1
ἀλλ’ ὧδε
845
mvp-comment-375-2
ἀβλαβεῖ βίῳ
846
mvp-comment-376-1
δόμους
847
mvp-comment-376-2
ἀμφέπειν
848
mvp-comment-376-3
φίλοισι
849
mvp-comment-377-1
εὐημεροῦσαν
850
mvp-comment-377-2
καὶ τέκνων
851
ὅσων
852
mvp-comment-377-3
We might also take
τέκνων
as standing, by attraction, for
τέκνοις
. When the antecedent is thus attracted, it usually comes after the relative (
O.C. 56); but sometimes precedes it, as in
Tr. 151
f.
τότ’ ἄν τις εἰσίδοιτο
... | ...
κακοῖσιν
(for
κακά
)
ο<*>ς ἐγὼ βαρύνομαι
. In examples of the latter kind, however, the acc. (and not, as it would be here, the dat.) is elsewhere the case attracted. In favour of taking
τέκνων
as partitive, it may be added that this suits the distinction between two groups of
τέκνα
. By
ὅσων
she means Chrysothemis, Iphianassa, and the offspring o<*> her union with Aegisthus (157; 589).
mvp-comment-377-4
ἐμοὶ … πρόσεστιν
853
mvp-comment-378-1
πᾶσιν ἡμῖν
854
mvp-comment-379-1
τὰ δ’ ἄλλα πάντα
855
mvp-comment-379-2
660 Following the directions given in vv. 39 ff., the Paedagogus now appears as a
ξένος Φωκεύς
. Cp.
O.T. 924 ff., where the messenger from Corinth presents himself to Iocasta and the Chorus.
mvp-comment-379-3
πῶς ἂν εἰδείην
856
mvp-comment-380-1
ἦ καὶ
857
mvp-comment-380-2
ἐπεικάζων κυρῶ
858
mvp-comment-380-3
πρέπ<*> γὰρ
859
mvp-comment-381-1
μάλιστα πάντων
860
mvp-comment-381-2
ἥδε σοι κείνη πάρα
861
mvp-comment-381-3
666 f. The
ὦ
862
χαῖρε
863
mvp-comment-382-1
ἐδεξάμην τὸ ῥηθέν
864
mvp-comment-382-2
Instant recognition of an utterance as well-omened was a way of appropriating the omen. The proper formula was
δέχομαι τὸν οἰωνόν
or
τὸν ὄρνιν
(
Her. 9. 91
;
Ar.
Pl. 63
). But
δέχομαι
alone was enough (
Xen.
An. 1. 8. 17
: cp.
Aesch.
Ag. 1653
δεχομένοις λέγεις θανεῖν σε
). The phrase used here recurs in
Her. 8. 114
δεξάμενος τὸ ῥηθὲν ἀπαλλάσσετο
: cp. also
Eur.
El. 622
προσηκάμην τὸ ῥηθέν
.
mvp-comment-382-3
εἰδέναι … σου
865
mvp-comment-383-1
Φανοτεὺς
866
mvp-comment-383-2
πρᾶγμα πορσύνων μέγα
867
mvp-comment-384-1
τὸ ποῖον
868
mvp-comment-385-1
ἐν βραχεῖ ξυνθεὶς
869
mvp-comment-386-1
τί φής, τί φής
870
ξεῖνε
871
mvp-comment-386-2
ταύτης
872
mvp-comment-387-1
νῦν τε καὶ πάλαι
873
mvp-comment-388-1
οὐδέν εἰμ’ ἔτι
874
mvp-comment-389-1
τὰ σαυτῆς πρᾶσς’
875
mvp-comment-389-2
διόλλυται
876
mvp-comment-390-1
κἀπεμπόμην
877
καὶ … φράσω
878
mvp-comment-391-1
γὰρ
879
mvp-comment-392-1
πρόσχημ’ ἀγῶνος
880
Ἑλλάδος
881
mvp-comment-392-2
πρόσχημα
882
mvp-comment-392-3
Δελφ. ἄθλων
883
mvp-comment-393-1
ὀρθίων
884
mvp-comment-393-2
δρόμον … οὗ πρώτη κρίσις
885
mvp-comment-394-1
εἰσῆλθε
886
mvp-comment-395-1
ἰσώσας * τἀφέσει
887
τῇ φύσει
888
mvp-comment-395-2
Now there is evidence that the customary order for the foot-races was, 1.
δόλιχος
, 2.
στάδιον
, 3.
δίαυλος
. See Boeckh
C. I. G. no. 1590 and 1591 (referring to games at Thespiae,
circ. 240 B.C.): also no. 2214 (games at Chios,
circ. 100—80 B.C.).
Paus. 6. 13. 3
(of the athlete Polites at Olympia),
δολίχου τε ἐν ἡμέρᾳ τῇ αὐτῇ καὶ παραυτίκα σταδίου λαβὼν νίκην προσέθηκε διαύλου σφίσι τὴν τρίτην
. It would agree, then, with the words
οὗ πρώτη κρίσις
(684) if the
δόλιχος
were meant here. [As to
Legg. 833 D, see Appendix.]
mvp-comment-395-3
For
ἄφεσις
as=‘starting-place,’ cp. Suidas (
s.v.
ἀπὸ γραμμῆς
):
γραμμῆς, ἣν ἄφεσιν καὶ βαλβῖδα καλοῦσιν
:
Paus. 6. 20. 9
ᾗ τοῖς σταδιοδρόμοις ἄφεσις πεποίηται
:
id. 5. 15. 5
ἐν δὲ τῶν ἵππων τῇ
ἀφέσει, ἐν μὲν τῷ ὑπαίθρῳ τῆς ἀφέσεως κ.τ.λ.
—Dindorf notes that in Aristeides vol. I. p. 339 the words
τῆς ἀφέσεως
were corrupted to
τῆς φύσεως
.
mvp-comment-395-4
The proposed versions of the vulgate
τῇ φύσει
889
mvp-comment-396-1
νίκης … γέρας
890
mvp-comment-397-1
χὥπως μὲν
891
mvp-comment-397-2
Others explain:—
οὐκ οἶδα δὲ ὅπως τοιοῦδ’ ἀνδρὸς ἔργα καὶ κράτη λέγω σοι παῦρα ἐν πολλοῖς
: ‘I do not know how to describe his deeds to you briefly, when they were so many.’ The place of
οἶδα
can be justified by
O.T. 1251. But: (1) thus construed, the words ought to mean, ‘I do not know how to describe his deeds
as few.’ The other meaning would require
ἐν παύροις
, or the like. And (2)
ἐν πολλοῖσι
is then awkward.