mvp-comment-45-1
θέλεις | μείνωμεν … ;
1
mvp-comment-45-2
The reading of the MSS.,
κἀνακούσωμεν
2
mvp-comment-45-3
On the other hand Sophocles has
ἐπακούω
, ‘to listen,’ in
O. T. 708
,
O. T. 794
:
O. C. 694
:
Ph. 1417.
Nauck's correction,
κἀπακούσωμεν
3
mvp-comment-46-1
μηδὲν πρόσθεν
4
mvp-comment-46-2
τὰ Λοξίου
5
mvp-comment-46-3
ἀρχηγετεῖν
6
mvp-comment-47-1
πατρὸς
7
mvp-comment-47-2
λουτρά
8
mvp-comment-47-3
φέρει … ἐφ’ ἡμῖν
9
mvp-comment-47-4
νίκην
10
κράτος τῶν δρωμένων
11
mvp-comment-47-5
All three actors now leave the scene. Orestes and Pylades go to Agamemnon's grave,—departing, probably, by the entrance on the spectators' right. The Paedagogus leaves by the entrance on the left,—to await the moment for seeking admission to the house (v. 660).—It might, indeed, be inferred from
πειρώμεθ’
(83) that the old man goes with the youths to their task; but the word need not imply more than his participation in the plan. while verses 73—75 seem clearly to indicate that he separates from his companions. When they have gone, Electra enters from the house.
mvp-comment-48-1
A
θρῆνος ἀπὸ σκηνῆς
, or lyric lament delivered by an actor alone. as dist. from the joint
κομμός
of actor and Chorus (121 n.).
mvp-comment-48-2
Verses 86—102 form a
σύστημα
,=vv. 103—120 (
ἀντισύστημα
). If the text is sound, the correspondence is not exact, since the dimeter in v. 99 answers to a monometer in v. 116. These anapaests are, however, of the type usually known as ‘free’ or ‘melic,’ as having more of a lyric character than the regular anapaests of the marching-songs (like those of the Parodos in the
Ajax): see W. Christ,
Metrik, 2nd ed., § 288. And in such anapaests the symmetry of ‘systems’ is often not strict (cp.
O. C. 117
n.).
mvp-comment-48-3
ὦ φάος ἁγνὸν
12
mvp-comment-48-4
γῆς ἰσόμοιρ’ ἀήρ
13
mvp-comment-48-5
ἰσόμοιῤ
14
ἰσόμοιρος
15
mvp-comment-49-1
πολλὰς μὲν … ᾔσθου
16
mvp-comment-49-2
ἀντήρεις
17
mvp-comment-50-1
πληγὰς
18
πλαγὰς
19
mvp-comment-51-1
ὑπολειφθῇ
20
ᾔσθου
21
mvp-comment-52-1
τὰ … παννυχίδων
22
ξυνίσας’
23
ὅσα … θρηνῶ
24
mvp-comment-52-2
ἤδη
25
mvp-comment-52-3
The MS.
οἴκων
26
λέκτρων
27
μογερῶν
28
mvp-comment-53-1
ὅσα τὸν δύστηνον
29
mvp-comment-54-1
κατὰ μὲν βάρβαρον αἶαν
30
ἐξένισεν
31
mvp-comment-55-1
Ἄρης
32
mvp-comment-55-2
ἐξένισεν
33
mvp-comment-56-1
κοινολεχὴς
34
mvp-comment-57-1
ὅπως δρῦν ὑλοτόμοι
35
mvp-comment-57-2
σχίζουσι
36
mvp-comment-57-3
κάρα
37
mvp-comment-57-4
πέλεκει
38
mvp-comment-58-1
ἄλλης
39
mvp-comment-58-2
φέρεται
40
mvp-comment-58-3
The deletion of the words
ἀπ’ ἄλλης
41
ἢ )μοῦ
42
mvp-comment-59-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ μὲν δὴ
43
mvp-comment-60-1
ἄστρων
44
mvp-comment-60-2
Others read,
ἔστ’ ἂν λεύσσω παμφεγγεῖς
|
ῥιπάς, λεύσσω δὲ τόδ’ ἦμαρ
, omitting
ἄστρων
. But
παμφεγγεῖς ῥιπάς
, without
ἄστρων
, would not suffice to denote starlight. If, again, the phrase is taken to denote the
sun's rays (as Monk proposes,
Mus. Crit. I. p. 67), then
λεύσσω δὲ τόδ’ ἦμαρ
becomes weak. Further, the preceding context, in which she has spoken of her laments
at night (92) and at morning, clearly suggests that the sense here is, ‘so long as I look on the
stars or on the
sun.’
mvp-comment-61-1
μὴ οὐ
45
mvp-comment-61-2
τεκνολέτειῤ
46
mvp-comment-62-1
ἐπὶ κωκυτῷ
47
mvp-comment-62-2
ἠχὼ
48
mvp-comment-63-1
Electra invokes, (1) the house of Hades and his bride Persephone, in which the spirit of Agamemnon now dwells; (2) Hermes, who, as
ψυχοπομπός
, conducted him thither,—and who will also guide the avengers on their way (1395 f.); (3)
Ἀρά
, the imprecation uttered by the victim upon his murderers,—the personified curse, here conceived as a supernatural power (
πότνια
), which calls the Erinyes into action; and (4) the Erinyes themselves.
mvp-comment-63-2
Ἀΐδου
49
mvp-comment-64-1
ὦ χθόνἰ Ἑρμῆ
50
mvp-comment-64-2
Ἀρά
51
mvp-comment-64-3
πότνια
52
mvp-comment-65-1
σεμναὶ
53
mvp-comment-65-2
θεῶν παῖδες
54
mvp-comment-66-1
ὁρᾶθ’
55
mvp-comment-67-1
αἳ τοὺς εὐνὰς ὑποκλεπτομένους
56
mvp-comment-67-2
These much-impugned words appear genuine. The murder has been prompted by the guilty love:
δόλος ἦν ὁ φράσας, ἔρος ὁ κτείνας
(197). In Electra's thought, they are inseparable. The allusion to the love
follows the reference to the murder, because she regards it as the crowning outrage (271
τὴν τελευταίαν ὕβριν
) that Clytaemnestra still lives with Aegisthus. Bloodshed was not the only sin which the Erinyes punished. They were the embodied sanctions of natural law, and every crime against the family came within their cognisance. (See
Introd. to Homer, p. 51, § 13.) Indeed, Electra herself speaks of the unhallowed union as a special provocation to those Avengers: 275 f.
ἡ δ’ ὧδε τλήμων ὥστε τῷ μιάστορι
|
ξύνεστ’, Ἐρινὺν οὔτιν’ ἐκφοβουμένη
.
mvp-comment-68-1
τείσασθε
57
mvp-comment-69-1
ἡμετέρου
58
μοι
59
mvp-comment-69-2
καί μοι
60
mvp-comment-70-1
ἄγειν
61
mvp-comment-70-2
σωκῶ
62
mvp-comment-71-1
δυστανοτάτας
63
mvp-comment-72-1
τάκεις … οἰμωγὰν
64
mvp-comment-72-2
ἀκόρεστον
65
mvp-comment-72-3
τὸν πάλαι
66
mvp-comment-72-4
πάλαι
67
ἐκ
68
mvp-comment-72-5
ἀθεώτατα
69
mvp-comment-72-6
κακᾷ … χειρὶ πρόδοτον
70
χειρὶ
71
mvp-comment-72-7
ὡς
72
mvp-comment-72-8
ὁ τάδε πορὼν
73
mvp-comment-72-9
εἴ μοι θέμις
74
mvp-comment-73-1
γενέθλα
75
mvp-comment-73-2
γενναίων
76
mvp-comment-73-3
παραμύθ‐
77
ιον
78
mvp-comment-74-1
ξυνίημι
79
mvp-comment-74-2
τάδ’
80
mvp-comment-75-1
φυγγάνει
81
mvp-comment-75-2
οὐδ’ ἐθέλω
82
mvp-comment-76-1
μὴ οὐ
83
mvp-comment-76-2
τὸν ἐμὸν … πατέρ’ ἄθλιον
84
mvp-comment-77-1
παντοίας
85
mvp-comment-77-2
Electra's lyrics contain some Doricisms (129, 146 f., etc.): but it is best to retain
φιλότητος
, with the MSS. The form in
η
was so familiar through Homer that it may have been preferred to
φιλότατος
even in lyrics.
Cp. 236
.
mvp-comment-78-1
ἀλύειν
86
mvp-comment-79-1
αἰαῖ, ἱκνοῦμαι
87
mvp-comment-80-1
τόν γ’ ἐξ Ἀΐδα … λίμνας
88
mvp-comment-80-2
παγκοίνου
89
mvp-comment-80-3
ἀνστάσεις
90
mvp-comment-81-1
οὔτε †γόοις οὔτε λιταῖσιν
91
οὔτε γόοισιν οὔτ’ εὐχαῖς
92
mvp-comment-82-1
For the repetition of
ἀλλά
93
mvp-comment-82-2
ἀπὸ τῶν μετρίων
94
mvp-comment-82-3
ἀμήχανον
95
mvp-comment-82-4
ο=ιόλλυσαι
96
mvp-comment-83-1
ἐν οἷς
97
mvp-comment-83-2
ἀνάλυσις … κακῶν
98
mvp-comment-83-3
τί μοι
99
mvp-comment-84-1
νήπιος
100
mvp-comment-84-2
γονέων
101
mvp-comment-85-1
ἐμέ γ’ … ἄραρεν
102
mvp-comment-85-2
φρένας
103
mvp-comment-86-1
αἰὲν Ἴτυν
104
mvp-comment-87-1
ὄρνις
105
mvp-comment-87-2
ἀτυζομένα
106
mvp-comment-87-3
Διὸς ἄγγελος
107
mvp-comment-88-1
Νιόβα, σὲ δ’
108
θεόν
109
mvp-comment-88-2
ἅτ’
110
mvp-comment-88-3
ἐν τάφῳ πετραίῳ
111
mvp-comment-89-1
αἰεὶ
112
mvp-comment-90-1
οὔτοι σοὶ μούνᾳ
113
mvp-comment-91-1
πρὸς ὅ τι
114
mvp-comment-91-2
τῶν ἔνδον εἶ περισσά
115
mvp-comment-92-1
οἷς
116
τῶν ἔνδον
117
mvp-comment-92-2
ὁμόθεν
118
γονᾷ ξύναιμος
119
mvp-comment-93-1
οἵα Χρ. ζώει
120
mvp-comment-93-2
Acc. to the version followed by Sophocles, Agamemnon had four daughters, Iphigeneia, Electra, Chrysothemis, Iphianassa. This was the account given in the cyclic
Κύπρια ἔπη
, as the schol. here mentions; a poem of which there is another trace in this play (566 ff.). Sophocles wrote an
Ἰφιγένεια
(
Nauck,
frag. Soph. 284—292
); but her name is not mentioned in the reference to her death below (530—594). In
Il. 9. 145
Agamemnon has three daughters, Chrysothemis, Laodicè, Iphianassa: Homer does not mention Iphigeneia. Lucretius gives the name of Iphianassa to the victim at Aulis (
1. 85
).
mvp-comment-93-3
ζώει
121
mvp-comment-93-4
καὶ Ἰφιάνασσα
122
mvp-comment-94-1
ἀχέων
123
mvp-comment-94-2
Hermann, taking
ἀχέων
124
κρυπτᾷ
125
mvp-comment-95-1
ὄλβιος, ὃν
126
mvp-comment-95-2
For the simple
ὅς
, instead of
ὅς γε
or
ὅστις
, with causal force, cp. below, 188, 261, 959;
O.T. 817.
mvp-comment-96-1
δέξεται εὐπατρίδαν
127
mvp-comment-96-2
Διὸς εὔφρονι
128
βήματι
129
mvp-comment-96-3
γᾶν
130
γᾶ
131
mvp-comment-96-4
Ὀρέσταν
132
ὃν
133
mvp-comment-97-1
ἀκάματα
134
mvp-comment-97-2
ἀνύμφευτος
135
ἄτεκνος
136
mvp-comment-97-3
οἰχνῶ
137
mvp-comment-98-1
δάκρυσι μυδαλέα
138
mvp-comment-98-2
τὸν ἀνήνυτον
139
mvp-comment-98-3
οἶτον ἔχουσα
140
mvp-comment-99-1
ὧν τ’ ἔπαθ’
141
ὧν τ’ ἐδάη
142
mvp-comment-99-2
Wecklein, reading
ἐδάην
, explains,— ‘what I have heard from him,’—viz., his promises of coming.
mvp-comment-99-3
τί γὰρ … ἀγγελίας
143
mvp-comment-99-4
ἀπατώμενον
144
τί … οὐκ
145
mvp-comment-99-5
Herwerden's
οὐχί μοι
146
οὐκ ἐμοί
147
ὁ δέ
148
mvp-comment-100-1
ποθεῖ, ποθῶν δ’
149
mvp-comment-101-1
ἔτι μέγας οὐρανῷ
150
ἐν
151
mvp-comment-102-1
τὸν ὑπεραλγῆ
152
mvp-comment-102-2
νέμουσα
153
mvp-comment-103-1
μήτε ὑπεράχθεο
154
οἷς
155
mvp-comment-104-1
εὐμαρὴς θεός
156
θεός
157
mvp-comment-105-1
οὔτε γὰρ
158
mvp-comment-105-2
Κρῖσαν
159
mvp-comment-105-3
Crisa stood about two miles W.S.W. of Delphi, on a spur of Parnassus, at the lower outlet of the gorge through which the river Pleistus issues into the plain. The
Iliad mentions ‘sacred Crisa’ (
ζαθέην
, 2. 520). But the Homeric Hymn to the Pythian Apollo is the best witness to its ancient power. There, just as here, the name
Κρῖσα
includes the land which stretches southward from the town to its harbour on the ‘wide gulf’ (vv. 253— 261). We need not, then, read
Κρίσᾳ
or
Κρίσας
. Crisa was the earliest seat of trade on the western sea; Delphi, when first founded, was merely a sanctuary in its territory. Pindar recalls the old prominence of its name when he describes a Pythian victory as won
Κρισαίαις ἐνὶ πτυχαῖς
(
P. 6. 18).
mvp-comment-105-4
Cirrha, a town of much later date, was the port of Crisa on the gulf. About 585 B.C., the Delphians, aided by Cleisthenes of Sicyon and his allies, succeeded, after a long struggle, in humbling Crisa and destroying Cirrha. The Crisaean plain was then devoted to Apollo, whose domain was thus extended from his temple to the coast. When Sophocles wrote, that ground was still a
βούνομος ἀκτή
, inviolable by plough or spade. It was not till the middle of the next century that the alleged encroachments of Amphissa on the
ἱερὰ χώρα
gave a pretext for war to the Amphictyons (355 B.C.).
mvp-comment-105-5
Ulrichs (
Reisen in Griechenland) was the first to place the relations of Crisa and Cirrha in a clear light. Strabo correctly describes the site of Cirrha, but erroneously places Crisa to the east of it (9. p. 418).
mvp-comment-106-1
βούνομον
160
βουνόμον
161
mvp-comment-106-2
βούνομον ἀκτὰν
162
Κρῖσαν
163
mvp-comment-107-1
ἀπερίτροπος
164
mvp-comment-108-1
παρὰ τὸν Ἀχέροντα
165
ἀνάσσων
166
θεὸς
167
mvp-comment-109-1
μὲν
168
mvp-comment-109-2
ὁ πολὺς … βίοτος
169
mvp-comment-109-3
ἀνέλπιστος
170
mvp-comment-109-4
187 *
τεκέων
. I am now satisfied that this is a true correction of
τοκέων
171
ἅτις
172
τοκέων
173
mvp-comment-110-1
ἁπερεί
174
mvp-comment-110-2
ἔποικος
175
mvp-comment-111-1
οἰκονομῶ θαλάμους
176
mvp-comment-112-1
ἀεικεῖ σὺν στολᾷ
177
mvp-comment-113-1
κεναῖς δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
178
ἀμφίσταμαι
179
mvp-comment-113-2
Hartung, reading
κενὰ δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
, takes the sense to be that she stands ‘hungry’ by the tables at which the others feast. But
κενή
as=
νῆστις
would be neither usual nor elegant.
mvp-comment-114-1
Hitherto the Chorus have offered consolation or counsel. At v. 213 they return to that strain. But here, moved by Electra's misery, they join with her in bewailing its cause.
mvp-comment-114-2
οἰκτρὰ μὲν … πλαγά
180
κοίταις
181
οἰκτρὰ … αὐδὰ
182
mvp-comment-114-3
Sophocles, who follows the Homeric story as to the banquet, could not but remember the
οἰκτροτάτην ὄπα
of the dying Cassandra. And this might naturally suggest to him that other
οἰκτρὰ αὐδή
which she had uttered at an earlier moment, immediately after Agamemnon's return,—her presage of his fate, and her own:
Aesch.
Ag. 1072
—1314.
mvp-comment-114-4
The sense then is:—‘There was a voice of lamentation at the return from Troy’; alluding especially to Cassandra's laments, but also, perhaps, to forebodings in the mouth of the people at Mycenae. ‘And there was a voice of lamentation
ἐν κοίταις πατρῴαις
, when thy father lay on the couch at the fatal banquet.’ The ‘voice’ at the banquet is, first, that of the dying Agamemnon; but Sophocles may have thought also of Cassandra's death-cry, which was sounding in the king's ears as he fell.—For other interpretations, see Appendix.
mvp-comment-114-5
νόστοις
183
ἐν
184
mvp-comment-114-6
κοίταις
185
mvp-comment-114-7
ὅτε οἱ
186
σοι
187
ἀνταία
188
mvp-comment-114-8
γενύων
189
mvp-comment-115-1
δόλος … ἔρος
190
mvp-comment-116-1
δεινὰν δεινῶς
191
δεινὰν … μορφάν
192
mvp-comment-116-2
εἴτ’ οὖν … εἴτε
193
βροτῶν
194
mvp-comment-117-1
πλέον … ἐχθίστα
195
mvp-comment-117-2
δὴ
196
mvp-comment-118-1
νὺξ
197
mvp-comment-118-2
δείπνων
198
mvp-comment-119-1
ἄχθη
199
τοῖς
200
θανάτους
201
mvp-comment-119-2
διδύμαιν χειροῖν
202
διδύμοιν
203
mvp-comment-120-1
εἷλον … πρόδοτον
204
mvp-comment-121-1
οἷς
205
mvp-comment-121-2
Ὀλύμπιος
206
mvp-comment-122-1
ποίνιμα
207
mvp-comment-123-1
ἀγλαΐας
208
mvp-comment-123-2
ἀποναίατο
209
mvp-comment-124-1
πόρσω
210
mvp-comment-125-1
γνώμαν ἴσχεις
211
mvp-comment-125-2
ἐξ οἵων
212
mvp-comment-125-3
τὰ παρόντ’
213
mvp-comment-125-4
οἰκείας
214
mvp-comment-126-1
πολύ … τι κακῶν
215
mvp-comment-126-2
ὑπερεκτήσω
216
mvp-comment-127-1
τὰ δὲ
217
οὐκ ἐριστὰ τοῖς δυνατοῖς
218
πλάθειν
219
mvp-comment-127-2
ἐριστά
220
mvp-comment-127-3
πλάθειν
221
mvp-comment-128-1
δεινοῖς ἠναγκάσθην
222
mvp-comment-129-1
ὀργά
223
ἔξοιδ’
224
mvp-comment-130-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
225
mvp-comment-130-2
ἐν … δεινοῖς
226
mvp-comment-130-3
σχήσω
227
mvp-comment-130-4
ταύτας ἄτας
228
mvp-comment-131-1
ὄφρα
229
mvp-comment-131-2
βίος ἔχῃ με
230
σχήσω
231
mvp-comment-132-1
τίνι γάρ … τίνι φρονοῦντι καίρια
232
ἀκούσαιμ’ ἂν πρόσφορον ἔπος
233
τίνι
234
πρόσφορον
235
mvp-comment-132-2
Other explanations are:—(1) Taking the dative with
πρόσφορον
:—‘To what person who feels aright would that word be suitable which I should hear (=which would be said of me)?’ That is: Should I not deserve to incur a censure from which every right-minded person would shrink? Should I not deserve to be called
δυσσεβής
? This seems forced; and it does not well suit
ἔπος
. (2) Taking the dative with
ἀκούσαιμι
:—‘At whose mouth (=
from whom), that thinks aright, could I hear a suitable word of comfort?’ But such a dative seems impossible. In
Il. 16. 515
δύνασαι δὲ σὺ πάντοσ’ ἀκούειν
|
ἀνέρι κηδομένῳ
, the dat. is one of interest, denoting the person whose prayer is heard (‘
for him’); cp.
Il. 5. 115
κλῦθί μοι
: 24. 335
ἔκλυες ᾧ κ’ ἐθέλῃσθα
.
mvp-comment-133-1
ἄνετε
236
mvp-comment-133-2
ἄλυτα
237
mvp-comment-133-3
κεκλήσεται
238
mvp-comment-133-4
231 f. For
ἐκ
239
mvp-comment-133-5
ἀνάριθμος
240
θρήνων
241
mvp-comment-134-1
ἀλλ’ οὖν
242
γε
243
εὐνοίᾳ
244
mvp-comment-135-1
μάτηρ ὡσεί τις
245
mvp-comment-136-1
μὴ τίκτειν
246
mvp-comment-136-2
ἄταν ἄταις
247
mvp-comment-137-1
καὶ τί μέτρον
248
κακότατος
249
mvp-comment-137-2
φέρε
250
mvp-comment-137-3
ἐπὶ τοῖς φθ.
251
mvp-comment-138-1
ἔβλαστ’
252
mvp-comment-139-1
τούτοις
253
mvp-comment-140-1
εἴ τῳ πρόσκειμαι χρηστῷ
254
mvp-comment-141-1
ξυνναίοιμ’
255
mvp-comment-141-2
εὔκηλος
256
mvp-comment-141-3
γονέων
257
ἐκτίμους
258
mvp-comment-141-4
ἐκτίμους ἵσχουσα
259
mvp-comment-141-5
πτέρυγας … γόων
260
mvp-comment-141-6
ὀξυτόνων
261
mvp-comment-142-1
εἰ γὰρ
262
mvp-comment-142-2
γᾶ
263
mvp-comment-142-3
οὐδὲν
264
ὢν
265
εἰ
266
mvp-comment-142-4
Electra is contrasting her father, whose earthly life has been cut short, with his murderers, who survive. But she believes that his spirit lives in the world below, and will be active in aiding the vengeance (453 ff.).
mvp-comment-142-5
πάλιν
267
mvp-comment-142-6
ἀντιφόνους δίκας
268
mvp-comment-143-1
ἔρροι τ’
269
mvp-comment-143-2
αἰδὼς
270
εὐσέβεια
271
mvp-comment-144-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
272
mvp-comment-144-2
καὶ
273
τὸ σὸν … καὶ τοὐμὸν
274
mvp-comment-145-1
νίκα
275
mvp-comment-145-2
ἅμα
276
mvp-comment-146-1
πολλοῖσι θρήνοις
277
mvp-comment-147-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
278
mvp-comment-148-1
ἥτις εὐγενὴς γυνή
279
mvp-comment-149-1
πατρῷα … πήματα
280
mvp-comment-150-1
κατ’ εὐφρόνην
281
mvp-comment-150-2
θάλλοντα
282
mvp-comment-151-1
ᾗ
283
mvp-comment-151-2
πρῶτα μὲν … εἶτα … ἔπειτα
284
ᾗ
285
mvp-comment-151-3
τὰ μητρὸς
286
mvp-comment-151-4
ἔχθιστα συμβέβηκεν
287
mvp-comment-152-1
κἀκ τῶνδ’ ἄρχομαι
288
mvp-comment-153-1
λαβεῖν … τὸ τητᾶσθαι
289
mvp-comment-154-1
ποίας
290
δοκεῖς
291
mvp-comment-155-1
ἴδω
292
εἰσίδω δ’
293
ἴδω δὲ
294
mvp-comment-155-2
μὲν
295
mvp-comment-156-1
ἐσθήματα
296
mvp-comment-156-2
ἐκείνῳ
297
mvp-comment-156-3
παρεστίους … λοιβάς
298
ἔνθ’ ἐκεῖνον ὤλεσεν
299
mvp-comment-156-4
Acc. to
Homer. Hymn. 29. 4 ff., feasts began and ended with libations to Hestia:
οὐ γὰρ ἄτερ σοῦ
|
εἰλαπίναι θνητοῖσιν, ἵν’ οὐ πρώτῃ πυμάτῃ τε
|
Ἱστίῃ ἀρχόμενος σπένδει μελιηδέα οἶνον
. Soph. fr. 658
<*> πρῷρα λοιβῆς Ἑστία
. Other divinities, including Zeus
σωτήρ
, were similarly honoured; then the paean was sung, and the
πότος
began ( Plat.
Symp.p. 176 A).
mvp-comment-157-1
τούτων
300
mvp-comment-158-1
αὐτοέντην
301
mvp-comment-158-2
Brunck first adopted
αὐτοέντην
302
αὐτοφόντην
303
mvp-comment-158-3
ἡμὶν
304
mvp-comment-159-1
ταλαίνῃ
305
mvp-comment-160-1
ταύτην … τῷδε
306
mvp-comment-161-1
μιάστορι
307
Ἐρινὺν
308
mvp-comment-162-1
ἐγγελῶσα τοῖς ποιουμένοις
309
mvp-comment-163-1
εὑροῦς’
310
τότε
311
mvp-comment-163-2
The conjecture
φρουροῦς’
312
τηροῦς’
313
mvp-comment-164-1
χοροὺς ἵστησι
314
mvp-comment-164-2
μηλοσφαγεῖ … ἱερὰ
315
mvp-comment-164-3
ἔμμην’ ἱερά
316
mvp-comment-164-4
τοῖς σωτηρίοις
317
mvp-comment-164-5
Argive tradition placed Agamemnon's death on the 13th of Gamelion (about the end of January). So said ‘the Argive historians’ (
οἱ Ἀργολικοὶ συγγραφεῖς
),— according to an Argive writer named Deinias, who lived about 225 B.C. (Schol. here: Müller,
Frag. Hist. vol. III. p. 25.) Possibly, then, the idea of Clytaemnestra's hideous festival may have been suggested to the poet by some actual commemoration of the event in Argolis. There was a cult of Agamemnon in various places,—notably in Laconia. (Cp. Roscher's
Lexicon, p. 96.)
mvp-comment-165-1
ἡ δύσμορος
318
κατὰ στέγας
319
mvp-comment-166-1
τέτηκα
320
mvp-comment-166-2
πατρὸς
321
mvp-comment-166-3
The
δαίς
is the feast which, in Homeric fashion (
Il. 1. 467
), would follow the sacrifice (281). Acc. to Eustathius p. 1507. 61 (on
Hom.
Od. 4. 524
ff.),
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαὶς
(or
τράπεζα
) was a proverb
ἐπὶ τῶν ἐπ’ ὀλέθρῳ εὐωχουμένων
. The poet may mean that Clytaemnestra called the festival
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαίς
, in direct allusion to
δεῖπνα ἄρρητα
(203): and this would give a special point to
ἐγγελῶσα
(277). Cp.
Eur.
Or. 1008
τά τ’ ἐπώνυμα δεῖπνα Θυέστου
. But the words do not necessarily imply more than that she called it
Ἀγαμεμνόνεια
.
mvp-comment-167-1
αὐτὴ πρὸς αὑτήν
322
αὑτήν
323
mvp-comment-167-2
κλαῦσαι
324
mvp-comment-167-3
ἡδονὴν φέρει
325
mvp-comment-168-1
ἡ λόγοισι γενναία
326
mvp-comment-169-1
φωνοῦσα
327
mvp-comment-170-1
δύσθεον
328
mvp-comment-170-2
μίσημα
329
mvp-comment-170-3
σοὶ μόνῃ
330
mvp-comment-170-4
τέθνηκεν
331
mvp-comment-170-5
ἐν πένθει
332
mvp-comment-171-1
ἐκ γόων
333
mvp-comment-171-2
οἱ κάτω θεοί
334
mvp-comment-172-1
τάδ’
335
mvp-comment-172-2
ἥξοντ’ Ὀρέστην
336
mvp-comment-173-1
παραστᾶς’
337
mvp-comment-174-1
ἥτις
338
mvp-comment-174-2
ὑπεξέθου
339
mvp-comment-175-1
ἀλλ’ ἴσθι τοι τείσουσά γ’
340
mvp-comment-176-1
ὑλακτεῖ
341
mvp-comment-176-2
σὺν
342
mvp-comment-176-3
πέλας
343
παρών
344
mvp-comment-176-4
301 The adv.
πάντα
345
mvp-comment-176-5
ἄναλκις
346
mvp-comment-176-6
ἡ πᾶσα βλάβη
347
mvp-comment-177-1
σὺν γυναιξὶ
348
mvp-comment-177-2
τὰς μάχας
349
mvp-comment-178-1
ἐφήξειν
350
mvp-comment-179-1
μέλλων … δρᾶν τι
351
mvp-comment-179-2
τὰς οὔσας τε … καὶ τὰς ἀπούσας
352
mvp-comment-179-3
μου
353
μοι
354
mvp-comment-179-4
διέφθορεν
355
mvp-comment-180-1
σωφρονεῖν
356
εὐσεβεῖν
357
mvp-comment-180-2
ἔν τοι κακοῖς
358
mvp-comment-180-3
πολλή )στ’ ἀνάγκη
359
κἀπιτηδεύειν κακά
360
mvp-comment-180-4
I place only a comma, not a colon, after
πάρεστιν
361
mvp-comment-181-1
ὄντος … βεβῶτος
362
mvp-comment-182-1
ἦ κάρτα
363
mvp-comment-182-2
θυραῖον
364
mvp-comment-182-3
οἰχνεῖν
365
mvp-comment-182-4
ἀγροῖσι
366
mvp-comment-182-5
τυγχάνει
367
mvp-comment-183-1
ἦ κἂν … ἱκοίμην
368
ἦ τ<*>ν
369
ἦ δἂν
370
mvp-comment-183-2
ἐς λόγους τοὺς σοὺς ἱκοίμην
371
mvp-comment-184-1
ὡς νῦν
372
ὥς νυν
373
mvp-comment-184-2
ἱστόρει· τί σοι φίλον
374
τό
375
τά
376
mvp-comment-184-3
With the other punctuation,
ἱστόρει τί σοι φίλον
377
mvp-comment-185-1
καὶ δὴ
378
mvp-comment-185-2
τοῦ κασιγνήτου τί φής
379
mvp-comment-185-3
ἥξοντος
380
ἢ μέλλοντος
381
mvp-comment-186-1
φησίν γε
382
mvp-comment-186-2
ποεῖ
383
mvp-comment-187-1
καὶ μὴν ἔγωγ’
384
γε
385
mvp-comment-187-2
οὐκ ὄκνῳ
386
mvp-comment-188-1
ἀρκεῖν
387
mvp-comment-189-1
ἐπεί
388
mvp-comment-189-2
μακρὰν
389
mvp-comment-189-3
324 Here, as in 316,
νῦν
390
νυν
391
mvp-comment-189-4
δόμων
392
φέρουσαν
393
mvp-comment-190-1
ὅμαιμον
394
mvp-comment-190-2
φύσιν
395
mvp-comment-191-1
Χρυσόθεμιν
396
mvp-comment-192-1
οἷα
397
νομίζεται
398
mvp-comment-193-1
πρὸς θυρῶνος ἐξόδοις
399
φωνεῖς
400
ἐλθοῦσα
401
αὖ
402
mvp-comment-193-2
330 For the absence of caesura, cp.
Ph. 101
n.
mvp-comment-194-1
θυμῷ … χαρίζεσθαι
403
mvp-comment-195-1
καίτοι τοσοῦτόν γ’ οἶδα
404
mvp-comment-195-2
κἀμαυτήν, ὅτι
405
mvp-comment-195-3
333 f. For the repeated
ἄν
406
mvp-comment-195-4
οἶ) αὐτοῖς φρονῶ
407
mvp-comment-196-1
ὑφειμένῃ
408
πλεῖν
409
mvp-comment-196-2
For the image, cp.
Eur.
Med. 524
ἄκροισι λαίφους κρασπέδοις
(with close-reefed sails)
ὑπεκφυγεῖν
|
τὴν σὴν στόμαργον, ὦ γύναι, γλωσσαλγίαν
:
Ar.
Ran. 997
ἀλλ’ ὅπως, ὦ γεννάδα
, |
μὴ πρὸς ὀργὴν ἀντιλέξεις
, |
ἀλλὰ συστείλας, ἄκροισι
|
χρώμενος τοῖς ἱστίοις κ.τ.λ.
: and conversely
Soph.
Ant. 715
ναὸς ὅστις ἐγκρατῆ πόδα
|
τείνας ὑπείκει μηδέν
.
Ovid
Epist. 1. 8. 71
moderatius opta, | Et voti, quaeso, contrahe vela tui.
Shakesp.
Henry VI., pt. iii, act 3 sc. 3. 5
‘Now Margaret | Must strike her sail, and learn awhile to serve | Where kings command.’
mvp-comment-197-1
καὶ μὴ δοκεῖν
410
mvp-comment-198-1
τοιαῦτα δ’ ἄλλα
411
ἀλλὰ
412
ἄλλα
413
mvp-comment-199-1
καίτοι τὸ μὲν δίκαιον
414
mvp-comment-199-2
κρίνεις
415
mvp-comment-199-3
εἰ … με δεῖ
416
mvp-comment-199-4
ἐλευθέραν
417
mvp-comment-199-5
ζῆν
418
mvp-comment-199-6
πάντ’
419
mvp-comment-199-7
ἀκουστέα
420
mvp-comment-200-1
δεινόν γε
421
mvp-comment-201-1
τῆς … τικτούσης
422
mvp-comment-201-2
μέλειν
423
mvp-comment-202-1
τἀμὰ νουθετήματα
424
mvp-comment-202-2
κείνης διδακτά
425
mvp-comment-202-3
ἐκ σαυτῆς
426
mvp-comment-203-1
The text, which has been suspected (cr. n.), is sound; but the train of thought is somewhat obscured by compression.
mvp-comment-203-2
‘You forget your father, and care only for your mother. All your counsels to me come from her. Then (
ἔπειτα
),—that being so,—give up the attempt at a compromise. Make a
choice (
ἑλοῦ γε
). You can be imprudent (
φρονεῖν κακῶς
),—as you say that I am,—and loyal to your dead father. Or you can be prudent (
φρονοῦσα
), and forgetful of him,—as you actually are; you who (
ἥτις
) say, indeed, that you would show your hatred of the murderers if you could; and yet, when I
do resist them, you try to turn me from my purpose. You merely add the shame of cowardice to our woes.’
mvp-comment-203-3
ἔπειθ’
427
mvp-comment-203-4
ἑλοῦ γε
428
mvp-comment-203-5
φρονεῖν κακῶς
429
mvp-comment-203-6
Other explanations are:—(1) ‘Choose to be thought either
lost to right feeling, or, if you have such feeling, then at least
forgetful of your duty.’ (2) ‘Choose to seem either
unintelligent (if you are merely the blind instrument of our rulers); or, if you act with clear understanding (
φρονοῦσα
),—thinking to benefit me,—at least forgetful of your father.’ Both these views assume that the question is merely between two interpretations which might be placed on the present conduct of Chrysothemis. But Electra is putting the dilemma between imprudent loyalty and prudent disloyalty.
mvp-comment-204-1
τῶν φίλων
430
mvp-comment-205-1
ἥτις
431
φρονοῦσα
432
μῖσος
433
mvp-comment-206-1
πάντα
434
mvp-comment-206-2
τιμωρουμένης
435
mvp-comment-207-1
οὔτε … τε
436
mvp-comment-207-2
τήν τε δρῶσαν
437
mvp-comment-208-1
πρὸς κακοῖσι
438
mvp-comment-208-2
δειλίαν ἔχει
439
mvp-comment-209-1
ἐπεὶ
440
mvp-comment-209-2
ἢ μάθ’ ἐξ ἐμοῦ
441
mvp-comment-210-1
ἐπαρκούντως
442
mvp-comment-211-1
προσάπτειν
443
mvp-comment-211-2
εἴ τις ἔστ’ ἐκεῖ χάρις
444
mvp-comment-212-1
ἡμὶν
445
ξύνει
446
mvp-comment-213-1
τὰ σὰ … δῶῤ
447
mvp-comment-213-2
ἐφ’ οἶσι
448
mvp-comment-213-3
χλιδᾷς
449
mvp-comment-214-1
ὑπεικάθοιμι
450
mvp-comment-214-2
πλουσία
451
mvp-comment-214-3
περιρρείτω
452
mvp-comment-215-1
τοὐμὲ μὴ λυπεῖν
453
mvp-comment-215-2
Remark the resemblance to the passage where Antigone—summing up her position—compares the
moral pain of neglecting her duty with those penalties which she contemns:—
κείνοις ἂν ἤλγουν· τοῖσδε δ’ οὐκ ἀλγύνομαι
(
Ant. 468
). There, too, we have a Sophoclean triad of clauses, the third echoing the first,—as
τῆς σῆς δ’ οὐκ ἐρῶ τιμῆς τυχεῖν
here reiterates the sense of
σοὶ δὲ πλουσία... βίος
(n. on
Ant. 465
ff.).
mvp-comment-215-3
One of the scholia recognises the traditional reading, and explains it correctly: —
τοῦτο μόνον ἐμὲ βοσκέτω, τὸ μὴ λυπεῖν ἐμὲ αὐτήν, εἰ
(‘as I should do, if’)
τοῖς φονεῦσι τοῦ πατρὸς πείθεσθαι ἀναγκασθήσομαι
.—The conjectures have been numerous: see Appendix.
mvp-comment-216-1
οὐδ’ ἂν σὺ
454
mvp-comment-217-1
παῖδα
455
mvp-comment-217-2
κεκλῆσθαι
456
mvp-comment-218-1
πλείστοις
457
mvp-comment-219-1
μηδὲν
458
πρὸς ὀργὴν
459
mvp-comment-220-1
ἀμφοῖν
460
τοῖς λόγοις
461
mvp-comment-221-1
τῆσδε … αὕτη
462
πάλιν
463
mvp-comment-222-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
464
mvp-comment-222-2
πως
465
mvp-comment-222-3
μύθων
466
mvp-comment-223-1
οὐδ’
467
κοὐδ’
468
ποτέ
469
mvp-comment-224-1
ἰὸν
470
mvp-comment-224-2
σχήσει
471
mvp-comment-225-1
τὸ δεινὸν
472
mvp-comment-225-2
εἰ γὰρ τῶνδέ μοι
473
εἰ
474
mvp-comment-226-1
γὰρ
475
mvp-comment-226-2
γόων
476
λόγων
477
mvp-comment-227-1
ἐνταῦθα
478
mvp-comment-227-2
ἔνθα μή ποτε … προσόψει
479
mvp-comment-227-3
ζῶσα
480
mvp-comment-227-4
κατηρεφεῖ
481
mvp-comment-227-5
χθονὸς τῆσδ’ ἐκτὸς
482
mvp-comment-227-6
ὑμνήσεις
483
mvp-comment-228-1
πρὸς ταῦτα
484
mvp-comment-228-2
Nauck reads
κοὔ
485
καί
486
mvp-comment-228-3
ἐν καλῷ, εὔκαιρον
schol.:
H. 4. 3. 5
νομίσαντες οὐκ ἐν καλῷ εἶναι πρὸς τοὺς ὁπλίτας ἱππομαχεῖν
: so, too,
Eur.
Heracl. 971
, etc. Cp.
καλόν
(
ἐστι
)=
καίριον
in
Soph.
Ph. 1155
; and
εἰς καλόν
=
καιρίως
in
O.T. 78.
mvp-comment-229-1
ἦ ταῦτα δὴ
487
ἦ … δὴ
488
ἦ … γὰρ
489
mvp-comment-229-2
καὶ βεβούλευνται
490
mvp-comment-230-1
ἀλλ’ ἐξίκοιτο
491
mvp-comment-230-2
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκ’
492
mvp-comment-231-1
τίνα … τόνδ’
493
mvp-comment-231-2
τάλαινα
494
mvp-comment-232-1
εἴ τι τῶνδε
495
mvp-comment-233-1
ποῦ ποτ’ εἶ φρενῶν
496
mvp-comment-234-1
ὅπως
497
ὑμῶν
498
mvp-comment-234-2
προσώτατ’
499
προσωτάτω φύγω
500
mvp-comment-235-1
βίου … τοῦ παρόντος
501
mvp-comment-236-1
καλὸς γὰρ
502
mvp-comment-236-2
θαυμάσαι
503
mvp-comment-237-1
τοῖς φίλοις
504
mvp-comment-238-1
εἰκαθεῖν
505
mvp-comment-239-1
ταῦτα
506
οὐκ ἐμοὺς
507
mvp-comment-240-1
γε
508
μέντοι
509
mvp-comment-240-2
μὴ )ξ
510
mvp-comment-240-3
πεσεῖν
511
mvp-comment-240-4
399 A woman, speaking of herself in the plur., uses the masc.:
Ant. 926
παθόντες ἂν ξυγγνοῖμεν ἡμαρτηκότες
.
mvp-comment-241-1
συγγνώμην
512
mvp-comment-242-1
τἄπη
513
mvp-comment-242-2
πρὸς κακῶν
514
mvp-comment-243-1
μή πω
515
mvp-comment-244-1
οἷπερ … ὁδοῦ
516
mvp-comment-245-1
τῷ φέρεις
517
mvp-comment-245-2
ἔμπυρα
518
mvp-comment-246-1
τυμβεῦσαι χοάς
519
mvp-comment-247-1
βροτῶν
520
mvp-comment-248-1
ὃν ἔκταν’ αὐτή
521
ὅν γ’
522
mvp-comment-249-1
τῷ τοῦτ’ ἤρεσεν
523
mvp-comment-250-1
δείματος
524
mvp-comment-250-2
δοκεῖν ἐμοί
525
mvp-comment-251-1
θεοὶ πατρῷοι
526
mvp-comment-251-2
συγγένεσθέ γ’
527
mvp-comment-251-3
ἀλλὰ νῦν
528
mvp-comment-252-1
εἴποιμ’ ἂν τότε
529
mvp-comment-253-1
ἐπὶ σμικρὸν
530
ἐπὶ σμικρῶν
531
mvp-comment-253-2
φράσαι
532
mvp-comment-254-1
σμικροὶ λόγοι
533
mvp-comment-255-1
πατρὸς … δευτέραν ὁμιλίαν
534
mvp-comment-255-2
ἐφέστιον πῆξαι
535
mvp-comment-255-3
This sceptre is described in the
Iliad (2. 101 f.) as the work of Hephaestus, who gave it Zeus; Hermes transmitted it to Pelops, from whom it passed to Atreus and Agamemnon. The Homeric sceptre is often called
χρύσεον
(
Il. 2. 268
, etc.), prob. as being ornamented with gold foil, or studded with gold nails (
Il. 1. 246
χρυσείοις ἥλοισι πεπαρμένον
). Among the objects found at Mycenae are some supposed remains of such sceptres (Schliem.,
Myc. 201, etc.).
mvp-comment-255-4
οὑφόρει ποτέ
536
mvp-comment-256-1
ἔκ τε
537
ἐκ δὲ
538
mvp-comment-256-2
βρύοντα
539
mvp-comment-256-3
ᾧ … γενέσθαι
540
mvp-comment-256-4
The vision resembles that of Astyages, who dreamed that a vine sprang from his daughter Mandanè, the wife of Cambyses,
τὴν δὲ ἄμπελον ἐπισχεῖν τὴν Ἀσίην πᾶσαν
. The
ὀνειροπόλοι
explained this to mean that her son (Cyrus) should reign in his grandfather's stead. (
Her. 1. 108.
) The spreading branches figure also in the dream of Xerxes (7. 19):
ἐδόκεε...ἐστεφανῶσθαι ἐλαίης θαλλῷ, ἀπὸ δὲ τῆς ἐλαίης τοὺς κλάδους γῆν πᾶσαν ἐπισχεῖν
.
mvp-comment-256-5
In choosing the
sceptre of Agamemnon as the stock from which the wondrous growth is put forth, Sophocles may have had in mind the words of Achilles (
Il. 1. 234
ff.);
ναὶ μὰ τόδε σκῆπτρον· τὸ μὲν οὔποτε φύλλα καὶ ὄζους
|
φύσει, ἐπεὶ δὴ πρῶτα τομὴν ἐν ὄρεσσι λέλοιπεν
, |
οὐδ’ ἀναθηλήσει
.
mvp-comment-257-1
του παρόντος
541
τοῦ
542
παρόντος
543
του
544
mvp-comment-257-2
Ἡλίῳ δείκνυσι τοὖναρ
545
mvp-comment-258-1
οὐ κάτοιδα, πλὴν
546
mvp-comment-258-2
πέμπει με κείνη
547
mvp-comment-259-1
These three verses, which the MSS. give to Electra, and which several recent critics reject (cr. n.), clearly belong to Chrysothemis, and are genuine. Electra's exclamation of joy (411) caused Chrysothemis to ask if her sister had any ground for hope (412). Electra replied that, when she had heard the dream, she would say. This showed her sister that Electra relied merely on the fact that Clytaemnestra had seen
some fearful vision. Now, therefore, instead of asking for Electra's interpretation, she merely repeats her counsel (383 f.) before proceeding on her errand. The words
πρός
νυν θεῶν κ.τ.λ.
(428 ff.) show the train of her thought. To Chrysothemis, the alarm of Clytaemnestra (427) is more important than the apparition of Agamemnon. The dream is only a new reason why Electra should be cautious,—not why she should hope.
mvp-comment-259-2
The current ascription of the verses to Electra was doubtless prompted by verse 413. It was supposed that the recital of Chrysothemis must be immediately followed by the comments of Electra. But, as Hermann observed, the phrase
ἀβουλίᾳ πεσεῖν
would alone suffice to show that the verses belong to Chrysothemis (
cp. 398
). Nor could the warning,
σὺν κακῷ μέτει πάλιν
, be fitly uttered by Electra.
mvp-comment-259-3
τῶν ἐγγενῶν
548
mvp-comment-260-1
ἀβουλίᾳ
549
mvp-comment-260-2
σὺν κακῷ
550
mvp-comment-260-3
μέτει
551
mvp-comment-261-1
ἀλλ’
552
mvp-comment-261-2
ὦ φίλη
553
τούτων μὲν
554
mvp-comment-262-1
οὐ … θέμις
555
οὐδ’ ὅσιον
556
mvp-comment-262-2
ἐχθρᾶς ἀπὸ γυναικὸς
557
mvp-comment-262-3
κτερίσματ’
558
mvp-comment-262-4
λουτρὰ
559
mvp-comment-263-1
ἀλλ’ ἢ πνοαῖσιν
560
ῥοαῖσιν
561
mvp-comment-263-2
κρύψον
562
mvp-comment-263-3
νιν
563
mvp-comment-263-4
ἔνθα μή ποτ’
564
ἔνθεν
565
mvp-comment-263-5
εὐνὴν
566
mvp-comment-264-1
ἀλλ’ ὅταν θάῃν
567
mvp-comment-264-2
The conjecture
ἔστ’ ἂν
568
ὅταν
569
σῳζέσθω
570
mvp-comment-264-3
κειμήλἰ
571
mvp-comment-265-1
ἀρχὴν
572
τλημονεστάτη
573
mvp-comment-266-1
ἔβλαστε
574
mvp-comment-267-1
ὅν γ’ … τῷδ’
575
mvp-comment-267-2
ἐπέστεφε
576
mvp-comment-267-3
442 f. The position of
αὐτῇ
577
mvp-comment-267-4
δέξεσθαι
578
mvp-comment-267-5
It seems, then, a reasonable inference that here, where the reference is to future time, he would have written
δέξεσθαι
579
δέξασθαι
580
mvp-comment-267-6
444 ff. Join
θανὼν ἄτιμος
581
mvp-comment-267-7
ἐμασχαλίσθη
582
mvp-comment-267-8
Two different motives are assigned by the Greek commentators; viz.:—(1) the desire to render the dead incapable of wreaking vengeance (
ὥσπερ τὴν δύναμιν ἐκείνων ἀφαιρούμενοι
): (2) the desire to make an atonement (
ἐξιλάσασθαι τὴν δολοφονίαν—ἀφοσιοῦσθαι τὸν φόνον
). There can be little doubt that the first of these motives was the primitive origin of the custom. If the second was afterwards blended with it, the idea may have been that of offering the severed portions to the gods below,—as a victim was devoted to death by cutting off a lock of hair (
Eur.
Alc. 75
). Apollonius Rhodius seems to present the practice in this light (4. 477): Jason, having slain a foe,
ἐξάργματα τάμνε θανόντος
. Cp.
Etym. Magn.:
ἀπάργματα λέγεται τὰ ὑπὸ τῶν τραγῳδῶν λεγόμενα μασχαλίσματα
.
mvp-comment-267-9
κἀπὶ λουτροῖσιν
583
mvp-comment-267-10
ἐξέμαξ ν
584
mvp-comment-267-11
ἆρα μὴ
585
mvp-comment-268-1
οὐκ ἔστιν
586
mvp-comment-268-2
ταῦτα μὲν μέθες· σὺ δὲ
587
mvp-comment-269-1
βοστρύχων ἄκρας φόβας
588
mvp-comment-269-2
κἀμοῦ ταλαίνης
589
mvp-comment-270-1
†ἀλιπαρῆ
590
λιπαρῆ
591
mvp-comment-270-2
We come, therefore, to a dilemma. (1) The words
τήνδ’ ἀλιπαρῆ τρίχα
may conceal some corruption:
τήνδ’
ought possibly to be
τήνδε τ’
592
ἀλίπαρον
593
mvp-comment-270-3
(2) Or else, if the text be sound,
ἀλιπαρῆ
may mean
οὐ λιπαράν
. There is no doubt that
λιπ
, ‘fat,’ is the root both of
λι^παρός
, ‘shining,’ and of
λι—παρής
, ‘sticking’; cp.
Plat.
Crat. 427 B
τὸ λιπαρὸν καὶ τὸ κολλῶδες
(
Curt.
Etym. § 340
). Similarly
γλίσχρος
, ‘sticky,’ came to mean ‘importunate.’ It is barely possible that, in coining a new negative compound, the poet may have transferred the sense of
λιπαρός
to
λιπαρής
: but it seems improbable.
mvp-comment-271-1
ζῶμα
594
mvp-comment-271-2
χλιδαῖς
595
mvp-comment-272-1
προσπίτνουσα
596
αὐτὸν
597
mvp-comment-273-1
ἐξ ὑπερτέρας χερός
598
mvp-comment-273-2
ζῶντ’
599
mvp-comment-274-1
ἀφνεωτέραις
600
mvp-comment-274-2
στέφωμεν
601
mvp-comment-274-3
δωρούμεθα
602
mvp-comment-275-1
οἶμαι μὲν οὖν
603
mvp-comment-275-2
If
μέλον
604
μέλειν
605
μέλον
606
mvp-comment-276-1
σοί
607
mvp-comment-277-1
βροτῶν
608
mvp-comment-278-1
πρὸς εὐσέβειαν
609
mvp-comment-279-1
δράσω
610
mvp-comment-279-2
τὸ γὰρ δίκαιον
611
mvp-comment-279-3
(1)
τὸ δίκαιον
is an acc. of general reference, and
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
is impersonal. ‘With regard to what is (clearly) right, it is unreasonable for two persons to dispute; rather both should hasten on the doing (of it).’ With
ἀλλ’ ἐπισπεύδειν
we supply the notion
δεῖ
from the negative
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
(as from
οὐκ ἔξεστι
in
O. C. 1402
ff.; cp.
O. T. 817
ff.). For the form of the sentence, cp.
H. 7. 3. 7
τοὺς περὶ Ἀρχίαν...οὐ ψῆφον ἀνεμείνατε, ἀλλὰ ὁπότε πρῶτον ἐδυνάσθητε ἐτιμωρήσασθε
. So here the acc.
τὸ δίκαιον
, which represents the object of
δρᾶν
, is separated from it by the parenthesis
οὐκ
ἔχει λόγον δυοῖν ἐρίζειν
. (The first scholium gives substantially this view:
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον φιλονεικεῖν περὶ τοῦ δικαίου, ὥστε περὶ αὐτοῦ δύο ὄντας ἐρίζειν
.)
mvp-comment-279-4
(2) Or
τὸ δίκαιον
might be nom.: ‘that which is clearly right does not
afford any ground (
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
) for two persons to dispute,’ etc. So the second schol.:
ἢ τὸ οὐκ ἔχει λόγον ἀντὶ τοῦ οὐ παρέχει πρόφασιν
. So far as the verb
ἔχει
is concerned, this sense is quite admissible: cp.
Thuc. 2. 41
οὔτε τῷ πολεμίῳ ἐπελθόντι ἀγανάκτησιν ἔχει
(
ἡ πόλις
). The objection is that the phrases
ἔχειν λόγον, οὐκ ἔχειν λόγον
, which are very common, regularly mean, ‘to be reasonable,’ ‘to be unreasonable.’ This is so both in the personal and in the impersonal constr.; as Plat.
Phaedop. 62 D
τὸ γὰρ μὴ ἀγανακτεῖν...οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
:
Dem. or. 36 § 54
πῶς ἔχει λόγον σὲ...δίκην ἀξιοῦν λαμβάνειν
; The supposed sense, ‘not to
afford a reason,’ is unexampled.
mvp-comment-279-5
δυοῖν
612
mvp-comment-280-1
παρ’ ὑμῶν
613
mvp-comment-281-1
πικρὰν
614
δοκῶ με … τολμήσειν
615
ἔτι
616
mvp-comment-282-1
εἰ μὴ )γὼ
617
mvp-comment-282-2
γνώμας λειπομένα
618
mvp-comment-283-1
ἁ πρόμαντις Δίκα
619
mvp-comment-283-2
δίκαια φερομένα χεροῖν κράτη
620
mvp-comment-284-1
μέτεισιν
621
mvp-comment-284-2
οὐ μακροῦ χρόνου
622
mvp-comment-285-1
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
623
κλύουσαν
624
mvp-comment-285-2
ἁδυπνόων … ὀνειράτων
625
mvp-comment-286-1
ἀμναστεῖ γ’ ὁ φύσας ς’
626
mvp-comment-287-1
χαλκόπλακτος
627
mvp-comment-287-2
γένυς
628
mvp-comment-287-3
The very axe (
φόνιος πέλεκυς
, 99) with which the blow was dealt is imagined as nourishing a grudge against the murderers who had set it such a task. Such a personification recalls that practice of Athenian law by which inanimate objects which had caused death were brought to a formal trial in the court called
τὸ ἐπὶ Πρυτανείῳ
, and, after sentence, cast beyond the boundaries, in the presence of the Archon Basileus and the sacrificial officers of the tribes (
φυλο‐
βασιλεῖς
). Aeschin. or. 3 § 244
τὰ μὲν ξύλα καὶ τοὺς λίθους καὶ τὸν σίδηρον, τὰ ἄφωνα καὶ ἀγνώμονα, ἐάν τῳ ἐμπεσόντα ἀποκτείνῃ, ὑπερορίζομεν
. (Cp.
Dem. or. 23 § 76
.) A like conception was implied in the English law (repealed in 1846) of ‘deodands’ (Deo danda),
i.e., personal chattels (whether animals or things) which, having caused the death of a human being, were forfeited to the Crown for pious uses.
mvp-comment-288-1
ἐν αἰκίαις
629
mvp-comment-289-1
καὶ πολύπους καὶ πολύχειρ
630
mvp-comment-290-1
λόχοις
631
mvp-comment-290-2
χαλκόπους
632
mvp-comment-291-1
ἄλεκτρ’ ἄνυμφα
633
mvp-comment-291-2
γάμων ἁμιλλήμαθ’
634
mvp-comment-291-3
ἐπέβα
635
mvp-comment-292-1
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι … συνδρῶσιν
636
mvp-comment-292-2
Verses 495—497 (
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι...τέρας
) answer metrically to vv. 479—481
ὕπεστί μοι...ὀνειράτων
, where the text is certain, save for the doubt whether
θράσος
or
θάρσος
should stand in 479. Here we must first decide two points.
mvp-comment-292-3
(1) Are the words
πρὸ τῶνδε
637
mvp-comment-292-4
(2) Could
ἔχει με, μήποτε τέρας πελᾶν
(etc.) mean, ‘
the belief possesses me, that’ etc.? Surely not. No real parallel for so strange a phrase has been produced. It is irrelevant to quote those impersonal verbs which directly express the
occurrence of a thought to the mind; as
Xen.
An. 6. 1. 17
εἰσῄει αὐτοὺς ὅπως ἂν καὶ ἔχοντές τι οἴκαδε ἀφίκοιντο
(‘the thought came to them, how they might,’ etc.):
Thuc. 6. 78.
§ 1
εἰ δέ τῳ ἄρα παρέστηκε, τὸν μὲν Συρακόσιον...πολέμιον εἶναι κ.τ.λ.
Either, then, the subject to
ἔχει
has dropped out, or the words
μ’ ἔχει
conceal a corruption.
mvp-comment-292-5
The following remedies are possible: I incline to the first, as involving least change. (1) Reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
, we may read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοί μ’ ἔχει
|
<θάρσος τι>, μήποθ’ ἡμῖν
etc. (It may be remarked that
τι
is in harmony with the tone of
ὕπεστί μοι
in 479.) Another available word is
ξύννοια
(cp.
Ant. 279
). (2) Or, reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θάρσος
, we could read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι θάρσος ἴσχει με
. On either view, the
υ
of
ἁδυπνόων
in 480 is long (as several critics have assumed). It should be noted that (1) involves a different constitution of the verses: see p. lxxxii.
mvp-comment-292-6
In those MSS. which have
μή ποτε μή ποθ’ ἡμῖν
638
mvp-comment-293-1
ἀψεγές
639
ἀψεφές
640
mvp-comment-293-2
πελᾶν
641
mvp-comment-294-1
τοῖς δρῶσι
642
τοῖς συνδρῶσιν
643
mvp-comment-295-1
μαντεῖαι βροτῶν
644
mvp-comment-296-1
εὖ κατασχήσει
645
mvp-comment-297-1
ἱππεία
646
mvp-comment-297-2
Oenomaüs, king of Pisa in Elis, had promised the hand of his daughter Hippodameia to the suitor who should defeat him in a chariot-race; the penalty of failure being death. The young Pelops, son of Tantalus, offered himself as a competitor. Myrtilus, the charioteer of Oenomaüs, was persuaded (either by Hippodameia or by Pelops) to betray his master. He did so by leaving out one or both of the linch-pins by which the naves of the chariot-wheels were secured to the axles.
Tzetzes on Lycophron 156
ταῖς χοινίκισι
(=
πλήμναις
, the naves)
τῶν τροχῶν οὐκ ἐμβαλὼν τοὺς ἥλους
. According to another story, he substituted a linch-pin of wax for a real one (
schol. Apoll. Rh. 752
ἐμβαλόντα κήρινον ἔμβολον ἐπὶ τοῦ ἀκραξονίου
). So Pelops won the race, and the bride. But Oenomaüs was soon avenged on the traitor; for Myrtilus insulted Hippodameia, and was thrown into the sea by Pelops; upon whose house he invoked a curse, as he sank.
mvp-comment-297-3
Euripides, too, (
Or. 990
ff.,
Helen. 386 f.) refers to this chariot-race as the event with which the troubles of the Pelopidae began. Apollonius Rhodius briefly describes the critical moment of the race as one of the subjects embroidered on the cloak of Jason (1. 752 ff.); there Oenomaüs was seen, ‘falling sideways, as the axle broke at the naves of the wheels,’—
ἄξονος ἐν πλήμνῃσι παρακλιδὸν ἀγνυμένοιο
|
πίπτεν
.
mvp-comment-297-4
The eastern pediment of the temple of Zeus at Olympia (
circ. 450 B.C.) was adorned with sculptures by Paeonius, representing the preparation for this contest (
Paus. 5. 10. 6
). The fragments found on the site have sufficed for a reconstruction of the group. Zeus occupied the centre; to the right of him were Pelops and Hippodameia; to the left, Oenomaüs and his wife Steropè. On each side was a chariot drawn by four horses. Myrtilus was sitting in front of his team, with his face turned away from his master.
mvp-comment-297-5
In the older and nobler form of the myth, Pelops won, not by a fraud, but by the grace of Poseidon, who gave him winged horses (Pindar
O. 1. 87
ἔδωκεν δίφρον τε χούσεον πτεροῖσίν τ’ ἀκάμαντας ἵππους
). On the chest (
λάρναξ
) of Cypselus, seen by Pausanias in the Heraeum at Olympia (
Paus. 5. 17. 5
), Pelops was driving two winged horses.
mvp-comment-298-1
αἰανὴς
647
mvp-comment-298-2
The form
αἰανὴς
has the best authority, and some critics hold that
αἰανὸς
(Hesych.) was a Byzantine invention. But in
Aesch.
Eum. 416
,
ἡμεῖς γάρ ἐσμεν νυκτὸς αἰανῆς τέκνα
(so L, schol., and Tzetzes on Lycophron 406),
αἰανῆ
is far less suitable.
mvp-comment-299-1
εὖτε
648
mvp-comment-299-2
ὁ ποντισθεὶς Μυρτίλος
649
mvp-comment-299-3
A vase found at Capua shows Pelops and Hippodameia in a ship, from which Myrtilus is falling backwards into the water. A winged Erinys hovers in the air above, brandishing a sword over the head of Pelops (Baumeister,
Denkmäler p. 1204, referring to
Mon. Inst. x. 25).
mvp-comment-299-4
ἐκοιμάθη
650
mvp-comment-300-1
παγχρυσέων δίφρων
651
mvp-comment-301-1
πρόρριζος
652
mvp-comment-301-2
ἐκριφθείς
653
mvp-comment-302-1
ἔλειπεν
654
ἔλιπεν
655
οἴκου
656
οἴκους
657
πω
658
mvp-comment-303-1
πολύπονος
659
αἰκία
660
mvp-comment-304-1
ἀνειμένη
661
μέν
662
mvp-comment-304-2
ὡς ἔοικας
663
mvp-comment-304-3
στρέφει
664
mvp-comment-304-4
Clytaemnestra begins in the same strain as Chrysothemis, who likewise emphasised her reproof by the word
αὖ
665
mvp-comment-305-1
μή τοι θυραίαν γ’
666
mvp-comment-305-2
αἰσχύνειν φίλους
667
mvp-comment-306-1
καίτοι
668
mvp-comment-306-2
δὴ
669
πολλούς
670
mvp-comment-306-3
ἐξεῖπάς με … ὡς
671
mvp-comment-306-4
θρασεῖα
672
τραχεῖα
673
mvp-comment-306-5
ἄρχω
674
mvp-comment-307-1
ὕβριν … οὐκ ἔχω
675
κακῶς κλύουσα
676
mvp-comment-308-1
πατὴρ γάρ
677
mvp-comment-308-2
πρόσχημα
678
mvp-comment-309-1
ἡ γὰρ Δίκη
679
mvp-comment-310-1
ᾗ χρῆν σ’ ἀρήγειν
680
mvp-comment-311-1
The order of words in the MSS.,
ἐπεὶ πατὴρ οὗτος σός
, is probably right; the words would then fall from her with a certain deliberate bitterness.
Cp. 542
:
Ant. 44
ἦ γὰρ νοεῖς θάπτειν σθ’
(n.):
Ph. 101
λέγω σ’ ἐγὼ δόλῳ Φιλοκτήτην λαβεῖν
.
mvp-comment-312-1
μοῦνος
681
Ἑλλήνων
682
mvp-comment-312-2
Nauck requires
τὴν αὐτὸς αὑτοῦ
instead of
τὴν σὴν ὅμαιμον
, because Agamemnon's unique crime was the slaughter of his own child: as if the text did not convey this. Clytaemnestra means, ‘while mourning a father, you forget a sister.’
mvp-comment-312-3
532 f. The regular mode of expression would be,
οὐκ ἴσον λύπης καμὼν ἐμοί, ὁ σπείρας τῇ τικτούσῃ
. But, having written
ὅτ’ ἔσπειρε
, the poet explains
ἐμοί
by repeating the comparison in a new form,
ὥσπερ ἡ τίκτουσ’ ἐγώ
. (For
ὡς
or
ὥσπερ
after
ἴσος
, cp.
Lys. or. 19 § 36
ἡγοῦντο... τὰ ἐκεῖ...εἶναι ἴσα ὥσπερ τὰ ἐνθάδε
.) Those who reject v. 533 omit to notice that, without it, the words
οὐκ ἴσον καμὼν ἐμοί
would be unintelligible. Cp.
Aesch.
Ag. 1417
ἔθυσεν αὑτοῦ παῖδα, φιλτάτην ἐμοὶ
|
ὠδῖν’
.
mvp-comment-312-4
This assertion of the mother's superior claim is a counterpart to the doctrine of Athena in
Aesch.
Eum. 658
f.,
οὐκ ἔστι μήτηρ ἡ κεκλημένου τέκνου
|
τοκεύς, τροφὸς δὲ κύματος νεοσπόρου
. Cp. above,
Aesch. Eum. 366
n.
mvp-comment-313-1
τοῦ χάριν, τίνων
683
mvp-comment-313-2
The alternative, which most editors have preferred, is to take
τίνων
as the participle. But there is an insuperable objection to this, which seems to have escaped notice. The words,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could mean only, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
for what?’ They could not mean, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
to whom?’ The latter would be
τῷ χάριν τίνων
; See (
e.g.)
Aesch.
P. V. 985
καὶ μὴν ὀφείλων ἂν τίνοιμ’ αὐτῷ χάριν
:
Aesch.
Ag. 821
τούτων θεοῖσι χρὴ πολύμνηστον χάριν
|
τίνειν
. Hence the question,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could not possibly be answered by
Ἀργείων
. For, evidently, the latter word could not mean, (‘for a benefit conferred by) the Greeks.’ A scholiast in the Baroccian MS. (cr. n. on 545), who explains
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
by
τίνος χάριν ἀποδιδούς
, plainly meant, ‘showing gratitude for what?’—and his paraphrase was correct; only he overlooked the context.
mvp-comment-314-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ μετῆν
684
mvp-comment-315-1
ἀλλ’ ἀντ’ ἀδελφοῦ δῆτα
685
κτανὼν
686
mvp-comment-315-2
ἀντὶ ἀδελφοῦ
687
mvp-comment-315-3
τἄμ’
688
mvp-comment-316-1
παῖδες … διπλοῖ
689
mvp-comment-316-2
540 f. Nauck would prefer a single verse in place of these two, viz.
οὓς Ἰφιγενείας εἰκὸς ἦν θνῄσκειν πάρος
.
mvp-comment-317-1
ἢ
690
mvp-comment-317-2
ἢ τῶν ἐμῶν Ἅιδης
691
mvp-comment-318-1
δαίσασθαι
692
mvp-comment-318-2
The conj.
λῄσασθαι
693
mvp-comment-319-1
πανώλει
694
mvp-comment-319-2
παρεῖτο
695
mvp-comment-319-3
The sense does not absolutely require us to take
Μενέλεω δ’
696
mvp-comment-320-1
ἀβούλου
697
mvp-comment-320-2
κακοῦ γνώμην
698
mvp-comment-321-1
δοκῶ μέν
699
mvp-comment-321-2
εἰ καὶ
700
mvp-comment-322-1
εἰ φωνὴν λάβοι
701
mvp-comment-323-1
τοῖς πεπραγμένοις
702
mvp-comment-324-1
γνώμην δικαίαν σχοῦσα
703
mvp-comment-325-1
ἐρεῖς μὲν οὐχὶ
704
ἐρεῖς
705
ἐρεῖς … μ’ ὡς
706
mvp-comment-325-2
ἄρξασά τι λυπηρὸν
707
mvp-comment-325-3
τάδ’ ἐξήκους’
708
mvp-comment-326-1
τοῦ τεθνηκότος θ’ ὕπερ
709
mvp-comment-327-1
καὶ μὴν
710
mvp-comment-327-2
λόγους ἐξῆρχές με
711