mvp-comment-40-1
ἀλλ’ ἀρχέπλουτον
1
mvp-comment-40-2
ἀρχέπλουτον
2
mvp-comment-40-3
καταστάτην
3
mvp-comment-41-1
εἴρηκα μέν νυν ταῦτα
4
mvp-comment-41-2
μελέσθω
5
mvp-comment-42-1
ἐπιστάτης
6
mvp-comment-43-1
ἰώ μοί μοι δύστηνος
7
mvp-comment-44-1
καὶ μὴν
8
mvp-comment-44-2
θυρῶν
9
mvp-comment-44-3
I should agree with the schol. in governing
θυρῶν
by
ἔνδον
10
mvp-comment-44-4
προσπόλων τινὸς
11
mvp-comment-45-1
θέλεις | μείνωμεν … ;
12
mvp-comment-45-2
The reading of the MSS.,
κἀνακούσωμεν
13
mvp-comment-45-3
On the other hand Sophocles has
ἐπακούω
, ‘to listen,’ in
O. T. 708
,
O. T. 794
:
O. C. 694
:
Ph. 1417.
Nauck's correction,
κἀπακούσωμεν
14
mvp-comment-46-1
μηδὲν πρόσθεν
15
mvp-comment-46-2
τὰ Λοξίου
16
mvp-comment-46-3
ἀρχηγετεῖν
17
mvp-comment-47-1
πατρὸς
18
mvp-comment-47-2
λουτρά
19
mvp-comment-47-3
φέρει … ἐφ’ ἡμῖν
20
mvp-comment-47-4
νίκην
21
κράτος τῶν δρωμένων
22
mvp-comment-47-5
All three actors now leave the scene. Orestes and Pylades go to Agamemnon's grave,—departing, probably, by the entrance on the spectators' right. The Paedagogus leaves by the entrance on the left,—to await the moment for seeking admission to the house (v. 660).—It might, indeed, be inferred from
πειρώμεθ’
(83) that the old man goes with the youths to their task; but the word need not imply more than his participation in the plan. while verses 73—75 seem clearly to indicate that he separates from his companions. When they have gone, Electra enters from the house.
mvp-comment-48-1
A
θρῆνος ἀπὸ σκηνῆς
, or lyric lament delivered by an actor alone. as dist. from the joint
κομμός
of actor and Chorus (121 n.).
mvp-comment-48-2
Verses 86—102 form a
σύστημα
,=vv. 103—120 (
ἀντισύστημα
). If the text is sound, the correspondence is not exact, since the dimeter in v. 99 answers to a monometer in v. 116. These anapaests are, however, of the type usually known as ‘free’ or ‘melic,’ as having more of a lyric character than the regular anapaests of the marching-songs (like those of the Parodos in the
Ajax): see W. Christ,
Metrik, 2nd ed., § 288. And in such anapaests the symmetry of ‘systems’ is often not strict (cp.
O. C. 117
n.).
mvp-comment-48-3
ὦ φάος ἁγνὸν
23
mvp-comment-48-4
γῆς ἰσόμοιρ’ ἀήρ
24
mvp-comment-48-5
ἰσόμοιῤ
25
ἰσόμοιρος
26
mvp-comment-49-1
πολλὰς μὲν … ᾔσθου
27
mvp-comment-49-2
ἀντήρεις
28
mvp-comment-50-1
πληγὰς
29
πλαγὰς
30
mvp-comment-51-1
ὑπολειφθῇ
31
ᾔσθου
32
mvp-comment-52-1
τὰ … παννυχίδων
33
ξυνίσας’
34
ὅσα … θρηνῶ
35
mvp-comment-52-2
ἤδη
36
mvp-comment-52-3
The MS.
οἴκων
37
λέκτρων
38
μογερῶν
39
mvp-comment-53-1
ὅσα τὸν δύστηνον
40
mvp-comment-54-1
κατὰ μὲν βάρβαρον αἶαν
41
ἐξένισεν
42
mvp-comment-55-1
Ἄρης
43
mvp-comment-55-2
ἐξένισεν
44
mvp-comment-56-1
κοινολεχὴς
45
mvp-comment-57-1
ὅπως δρῦν ὑλοτόμοι
46
mvp-comment-57-2
σχίζουσι
47
mvp-comment-57-3
κάρα
48
mvp-comment-57-4
πέλεκει
49
mvp-comment-58-1
ἄλλης
50
mvp-comment-58-2
φέρεται
51
mvp-comment-58-3
The deletion of the words
ἀπ’ ἄλλης
52
ἢ )μοῦ
53
mvp-comment-59-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ μὲν δὴ
54
mvp-comment-60-1
ἄστρων
55
mvp-comment-60-2
Others read,
ἔστ’ ἂν λεύσσω παμφεγγεῖς
|
ῥιπάς, λεύσσω δὲ τόδ’ ἦμαρ
, omitting
ἄστρων
. But
παμφεγγεῖς ῥιπάς
, without
ἄστρων
, would not suffice to denote starlight. If, again, the phrase is taken to denote the
sun's rays (as Monk proposes,
Mus. Crit. I. p. 67), then
λεύσσω δὲ τόδ’ ἦμαρ
becomes weak. Further, the preceding context, in which she has spoken of her laments
at night (92) and at morning, clearly suggests that the sense here is, ‘so long as I look on the
stars or on the
sun.’
mvp-comment-61-1
μὴ οὐ
56
mvp-comment-61-2
τεκνολέτειῤ
57
mvp-comment-62-1
ἐπὶ κωκυτῷ
58
mvp-comment-62-2
ἠχὼ
59
mvp-comment-63-1
Electra invokes, (1) the house of Hades and his bride Persephone, in which the spirit of Agamemnon now dwells; (2) Hermes, who, as
ψυχοπομπός
, conducted him thither,—and who will also guide the avengers on their way (1395 f.); (3)
Ἀρά
, the imprecation uttered by the victim upon his murderers,—the personified curse, here conceived as a supernatural power (
πότνια
), which calls the Erinyes into action; and (4) the Erinyes themselves.
mvp-comment-63-2
Ἀΐδου
60
mvp-comment-64-1
ὦ χθόνἰ Ἑρμῆ
61
mvp-comment-64-2
Ἀρά
62
mvp-comment-64-3
πότνια
63
mvp-comment-65-1
σεμναὶ
64
mvp-comment-65-2
θεῶν παῖδες
65
mvp-comment-66-1
ὁρᾶθ’
66
mvp-comment-67-1
αἳ τοὺς εὐνὰς ὑποκλεπτομένους
67
mvp-comment-67-2
These much-impugned words appear genuine. The murder has been prompted by the guilty love:
δόλος ἦν ὁ φράσας, ἔρος ὁ κτείνας
(197). In Electra's thought, they are inseparable. The allusion to the love
follows the reference to the murder, because she regards it as the crowning outrage (271
τὴν τελευταίαν ὕβριν
) that Clytaemnestra still lives with Aegisthus. Bloodshed was not the only sin which the Erinyes punished. They were the embodied sanctions of natural law, and every crime against the family came within their cognisance. (See
Introd. to Homer, p. 51, § 13.) Indeed, Electra herself speaks of the unhallowed union as a special provocation to those Avengers: 275 f.
ἡ δ’ ὧδε τλήμων ὥστε τῷ μιάστορι
|
ξύνεστ’, Ἐρινὺν οὔτιν’ ἐκφοβουμένη
.
mvp-comment-68-1
τείσασθε
68
mvp-comment-69-1
ἡμετέρου
69
μοι
70
mvp-comment-69-2
καί μοι
71
mvp-comment-70-1
ἄγειν
72
mvp-comment-70-2
σωκῶ
73
mvp-comment-71-1
δυστανοτάτας
74
mvp-comment-72-1
τάκεις … οἰμωγὰν
75
mvp-comment-72-2
ἀκόρεστον
76
mvp-comment-72-3
τὸν πάλαι
77
mvp-comment-72-4
πάλαι
78
ἐκ
79
mvp-comment-72-5
ἀθεώτατα
80
mvp-comment-72-6
κακᾷ … χειρὶ πρόδοτον
81
χειρὶ
82
mvp-comment-72-7
ὡς
83
mvp-comment-72-8
ὁ τάδε πορὼν
84
mvp-comment-72-9
εἴ μοι θέμις
85
mvp-comment-73-1
γενέθλα
86
mvp-comment-73-2
γενναίων
87
mvp-comment-73-3
παραμύθ‐
88
ιον
89
mvp-comment-74-1
ξυνίημι
90
mvp-comment-74-2
τάδ’
91
mvp-comment-75-1
φυγγάνει
92
mvp-comment-75-2
οὐδ’ ἐθέλω
93
mvp-comment-76-1
μὴ οὐ
94
mvp-comment-76-2
τὸν ἐμὸν … πατέρ’ ἄθλιον
95
mvp-comment-77-1
παντοίας
96
mvp-comment-77-2
Electra's lyrics contain some Doricisms (129, 146 f., etc.): but it is best to retain
φιλότητος
, with the MSS. The form in
η
was so familiar through Homer that it may have been preferred to
φιλότατος
even in lyrics.
Cp. 236
.
mvp-comment-78-1
ἀλύειν
97
mvp-comment-79-1
αἰαῖ, ἱκνοῦμαι
98
mvp-comment-80-1
τόν γ’ ἐξ Ἀΐδα … λίμνας
99
mvp-comment-80-2
παγκοίνου
100
mvp-comment-80-3
ἀνστάσεις
101
mvp-comment-81-1
οὔτε †γόοις οὔτε λιταῖσιν
102
οὔτε γόοισιν οὔτ’ εὐχαῖς
103
mvp-comment-82-1
For the repetition of
ἀλλά
104
mvp-comment-82-2
ἀπὸ τῶν μετρίων
105
mvp-comment-82-3
ἀμήχανον
106
mvp-comment-82-4
ο=ιόλλυσαι
107
mvp-comment-83-1
ἐν οἷς
108
mvp-comment-83-2
ἀνάλυσις … κακῶν
109
mvp-comment-83-3
τί μοι
110
mvp-comment-84-1
νήπιος
111
mvp-comment-84-2
γονέων
112
mvp-comment-85-1
ἐμέ γ’ … ἄραρεν
113
mvp-comment-85-2
φρένας
114
mvp-comment-86-1
αἰὲν Ἴτυν
115
mvp-comment-87-1
ὄρνις
116
mvp-comment-87-2
ἀτυζομένα
117
mvp-comment-87-3
Διὸς ἄγγελος
118
mvp-comment-88-1
Νιόβα, σὲ δ’
119
θεόν
120
mvp-comment-88-2
ἅτ’
121
mvp-comment-88-3
ἐν τάφῳ πετραίῳ
122
mvp-comment-89-1
αἰεὶ
123
mvp-comment-90-1
οὔτοι σοὶ μούνᾳ
124
mvp-comment-91-1
πρὸς ὅ τι
125
mvp-comment-91-2
τῶν ἔνδον εἶ περισσά
126
mvp-comment-92-1
οἷς
127
τῶν ἔνδον
128
mvp-comment-92-2
ὁμόθεν
129
γονᾷ ξύναιμος
130
mvp-comment-93-1
οἵα Χρ. ζώει
131
mvp-comment-93-2
Acc. to the version followed by Sophocles, Agamemnon had four daughters, Iphigeneia, Electra, Chrysothemis, Iphianassa. This was the account given in the cyclic
Κύπρια ἔπη
, as the schol. here mentions; a poem of which there is another trace in this play (566 ff.). Sophocles wrote an
Ἰφιγένεια
(
Nauck,
frag. Soph. 284—292
); but her name is not mentioned in the reference to her death below (530—594). In
Il. 9. 145
Agamemnon has three daughters, Chrysothemis, Laodicè, Iphianassa: Homer does not mention Iphigeneia. Lucretius gives the name of Iphianassa to the victim at Aulis (
1. 85
).
mvp-comment-93-3
ζώει
132
mvp-comment-93-4
καὶ Ἰφιάνασσα
133
mvp-comment-94-1
ἀχέων
134
mvp-comment-94-2
Hermann, taking
ἀχέων
135
κρυπτᾷ
136
mvp-comment-95-1
ὄλβιος, ὃν
137
mvp-comment-95-2
For the simple
ὅς
, instead of
ὅς γε
or
ὅστις
, with causal force, cp. below, 188, 261, 959;
O.T. 817.
mvp-comment-96-1
δέξεται εὐπατρίδαν
138
mvp-comment-96-2
Διὸς εὔφρονι
139
βήματι
140
mvp-comment-96-3
γᾶν
141
γᾶ
142
mvp-comment-96-4
Ὀρέσταν
143
ὃν
144
mvp-comment-97-1
ἀκάματα
145
mvp-comment-97-2
ἀνύμφευτος
146
ἄτεκνος
147
mvp-comment-97-3
οἰχνῶ
148
mvp-comment-98-1
δάκρυσι μυδαλέα
149
mvp-comment-98-2
τὸν ἀνήνυτον
150
mvp-comment-98-3
οἶτον ἔχουσα
151
mvp-comment-99-1
ὧν τ’ ἔπαθ’
152
ὧν τ’ ἐδάη
153
mvp-comment-99-2
Wecklein, reading
ἐδάην
, explains,— ‘what I have heard from him,’—viz., his promises of coming.
mvp-comment-99-3
τί γὰρ … ἀγγελίας
154
mvp-comment-99-4
ἀπατώμενον
155
τί … οὐκ
156
mvp-comment-99-5
Herwerden's
οὐχί μοι
157
οὐκ ἐμοί
158
ὁ δέ
159
mvp-comment-100-1
ποθεῖ, ποθῶν δ’
160
mvp-comment-101-1
ἔτι μέγας οὐρανῷ
161
ἐν
162
mvp-comment-102-1
τὸν ὑπεραλγῆ
163
mvp-comment-102-2
νέμουσα
164
mvp-comment-103-1
μήτε ὑπεράχθεο
165
οἷς
166
mvp-comment-104-1
εὐμαρὴς θεός
167
θεός
168
mvp-comment-105-1
οὔτε γὰρ
169
mvp-comment-105-2
Κρῖσαν
170
mvp-comment-105-3
Crisa stood about two miles W.S.W. of Delphi, on a spur of Parnassus, at the lower outlet of the gorge through which the river Pleistus issues into the plain. The
Iliad mentions ‘sacred Crisa’ (
ζαθέην
, 2. 520). But the Homeric Hymn to the Pythian Apollo is the best witness to its ancient power. There, just as here, the name
Κρῖσα
includes the land which stretches southward from the town to its harbour on the ‘wide gulf’ (vv. 253— 261). We need not, then, read
Κρίσᾳ
or
Κρίσας
. Crisa was the earliest seat of trade on the western sea; Delphi, when first founded, was merely a sanctuary in its territory. Pindar recalls the old prominence of its name when he describes a Pythian victory as won
Κρισαίαις ἐνὶ πτυχαῖς
(
P. 6. 18).
mvp-comment-105-4
Cirrha, a town of much later date, was the port of Crisa on the gulf. About 585 B.C., the Delphians, aided by Cleisthenes of Sicyon and his allies, succeeded, after a long struggle, in humbling Crisa and destroying Cirrha. The Crisaean plain was then devoted to Apollo, whose domain was thus extended from his temple to the coast. When Sophocles wrote, that ground was still a
βούνομος ἀκτή
, inviolable by plough or spade. It was not till the middle of the next century that the alleged encroachments of Amphissa on the
ἱερὰ χώρα
gave a pretext for war to the Amphictyons (355 B.C.).
mvp-comment-105-5
Ulrichs (
Reisen in Griechenland) was the first to place the relations of Crisa and Cirrha in a clear light. Strabo correctly describes the site of Cirrha, but erroneously places Crisa to the east of it (9. p. 418).
mvp-comment-106-1
βούνομον
171
βουνόμον
172
mvp-comment-106-2
βούνομον ἀκτὰν
173
Κρῖσαν
174
mvp-comment-107-1
ἀπερίτροπος
175
mvp-comment-108-1
παρὰ τὸν Ἀχέροντα
176
ἀνάσσων
177
θεὸς
178
mvp-comment-109-1
μὲν
179
mvp-comment-109-2
ὁ πολὺς … βίοτος
180
mvp-comment-109-3
ἀνέλπιστος
181
mvp-comment-109-4
187 *
τεκέων
. I am now satisfied that this is a true correction of
τοκέων
182
ἅτις
183
τοκέων
184
mvp-comment-110-1
ἁπερεί
185
mvp-comment-110-2
ἔποικος
186
mvp-comment-111-1
οἰκονομῶ θαλάμους
187
mvp-comment-112-1
ἀεικεῖ σὺν στολᾷ
188
mvp-comment-113-1
κεναῖς δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
189
ἀμφίσταμαι
190
mvp-comment-113-2
Hartung, reading
κενὰ δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
, takes the sense to be that she stands ‘hungry’ by the tables at which the others feast. But
κενή
as=
νῆστις
would be neither usual nor elegant.
mvp-comment-114-1
Hitherto the Chorus have offered consolation or counsel. At v. 213 they return to that strain. But here, moved by Electra's misery, they join with her in bewailing its cause.
mvp-comment-114-2
οἰκτρὰ μὲν … πλαγά
191
κοίταις
192
οἰκτρὰ … αὐδὰ
193
mvp-comment-114-3
Sophocles, who follows the Homeric story as to the banquet, could not but remember the
οἰκτροτάτην ὄπα
of the dying Cassandra. And this might naturally suggest to him that other
οἰκτρὰ αὐδή
which she had uttered at an earlier moment, immediately after Agamemnon's return,—her presage of his fate, and her own:
Aesch.
Ag. 1072
—1314.
mvp-comment-114-4
The sense then is:—‘There was a voice of lamentation at the return from Troy’; alluding especially to Cassandra's laments, but also, perhaps, to forebodings in the mouth of the people at Mycenae. ‘And there was a voice of lamentation
ἐν κοίταις πατρῴαις
, when thy father lay on the couch at the fatal banquet.’ The ‘voice’ at the banquet is, first, that of the dying Agamemnon; but Sophocles may have thought also of Cassandra's death-cry, which was sounding in the king's ears as he fell.—For other interpretations, see Appendix.
mvp-comment-114-5
νόστοις
194
ἐν
195
mvp-comment-114-6
κοίταις
196
mvp-comment-114-7
ὅτε οἱ
197
σοι
198
ἀνταία
199
mvp-comment-114-8
γενύων
200
mvp-comment-115-1
δόλος … ἔρος
201
mvp-comment-116-1
δεινὰν δεινῶς
202
δεινὰν … μορφάν
203
mvp-comment-116-2
εἴτ’ οὖν … εἴτε
204
βροτῶν
205
mvp-comment-117-1
πλέον … ἐχθίστα
206
mvp-comment-117-2
δὴ
207
mvp-comment-118-1
νὺξ
208
mvp-comment-118-2
δείπνων
209
mvp-comment-119-1
ἄχθη
210
τοῖς
211
θανάτους
212
mvp-comment-119-2
διδύμαιν χειροῖν
213
διδύμοιν
214
mvp-comment-120-1
εἷλον … πρόδοτον
215
mvp-comment-121-1
οἷς
216
mvp-comment-121-2
Ὀλύμπιος
217
mvp-comment-122-1
ποίνιμα
218
mvp-comment-123-1
ἀγλαΐας
219
mvp-comment-123-2
ἀποναίατο
220
mvp-comment-124-1
πόρσω
221
mvp-comment-125-1
γνώμαν ἴσχεις
222
mvp-comment-125-2
ἐξ οἵων
223
mvp-comment-125-3
τὰ παρόντ’
224
mvp-comment-125-4
οἰκείας
225
mvp-comment-126-1
πολύ … τι κακῶν
226
mvp-comment-126-2
ὑπερεκτήσω
227
mvp-comment-127-1
τὰ δὲ
228
οὐκ ἐριστὰ τοῖς δυνατοῖς
229
πλάθειν
230
mvp-comment-127-2
ἐριστά
231
mvp-comment-127-3
πλάθειν
232
mvp-comment-128-1
δεινοῖς ἠναγκάσθην
233
mvp-comment-129-1
ὀργά
234
ἔξοιδ’
235
mvp-comment-130-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
236
mvp-comment-130-2
ἐν … δεινοῖς
237
mvp-comment-130-3
σχήσω
238
mvp-comment-130-4
ταύτας ἄτας
239
mvp-comment-131-1
ὄφρα
240
mvp-comment-131-2
βίος ἔχῃ με
241
σχήσω
242
mvp-comment-132-1
τίνι γάρ … τίνι φρονοῦντι καίρια
243
ἀκούσαιμ’ ἂν πρόσφορον ἔπος
244
τίνι
245
πρόσφορον
246
mvp-comment-132-2
Other explanations are:—(1) Taking the dative with
πρόσφορον
:—‘To what person who feels aright would that word be suitable which I should hear (=which would be said of me)?’ That is: Should I not deserve to incur a censure from which every right-minded person would shrink? Should I not deserve to be called
δυσσεβής
? This seems forced; and it does not well suit
ἔπος
. (2) Taking the dative with
ἀκούσαιμι
:—‘At whose mouth (=
from whom), that thinks aright, could I hear a suitable word of comfort?’ But such a dative seems impossible. In
Il. 16. 515
δύνασαι δὲ σὺ πάντοσ’ ἀκούειν
|
ἀνέρι κηδομένῳ
, the dat. is one of interest, denoting the person whose prayer is heard (‘
for him’); cp.
Il. 5. 115
κλῦθί μοι
: 24. 335
ἔκλυες ᾧ κ’ ἐθέλῃσθα
.
mvp-comment-133-1
ἄνετε
247
mvp-comment-133-2
ἄλυτα
248
mvp-comment-133-3
κεκλήσεται
249
mvp-comment-133-4
231 f. For
ἐκ
250
mvp-comment-133-5
ἀνάριθμος
251
θρήνων
252
mvp-comment-134-1
ἀλλ’ οὖν
253
γε
254
εὐνοίᾳ
255
mvp-comment-135-1
μάτηρ ὡσεί τις
256
mvp-comment-136-1
μὴ τίκτειν
257
mvp-comment-136-2
ἄταν ἄταις
258
mvp-comment-137-1
καὶ τί μέτρον
259
κακότατος
260
mvp-comment-137-2
φέρε
261
mvp-comment-137-3
ἐπὶ τοῖς φθ.
262
mvp-comment-138-1
ἔβλαστ’
263
mvp-comment-139-1
τούτοις
264
mvp-comment-140-1
εἴ τῳ πρόσκειμαι χρηστῷ
265
mvp-comment-141-1
ξυνναίοιμ’
266
mvp-comment-141-2
εὔκηλος
267
mvp-comment-141-3
γονέων
268
ἐκτίμους
269
mvp-comment-141-4
ἐκτίμους ἵσχουσα
270
mvp-comment-141-5
πτέρυγας … γόων
271
mvp-comment-141-6
ὀξυτόνων
272
mvp-comment-142-1
εἰ γὰρ
273
mvp-comment-142-2
γᾶ
274
mvp-comment-142-3
οὐδὲν
275
ὢν
276
εἰ
277
mvp-comment-142-4
Electra is contrasting her father, whose earthly life has been cut short, with his murderers, who survive. But she believes that his spirit lives in the world below, and will be active in aiding the vengeance (453 ff.).
mvp-comment-142-5
πάλιν
278
mvp-comment-142-6
ἀντιφόνους δίκας
279
mvp-comment-143-1
ἔρροι τ’
280
mvp-comment-143-2
αἰδὼς
281
εὐσέβεια
282
mvp-comment-144-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
283
mvp-comment-144-2
καὶ
284
τὸ σὸν … καὶ τοὐμὸν
285
mvp-comment-145-1
νίκα
286
mvp-comment-145-2
ἅμα
287
mvp-comment-146-1
πολλοῖσι θρήνοις
288
mvp-comment-147-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
289
mvp-comment-148-1
ἥτις εὐγενὴς γυνή
290
mvp-comment-149-1
πατρῷα … πήματα
291
mvp-comment-150-1
κατ’ εὐφρόνην
292
mvp-comment-150-2
θάλλοντα
293
mvp-comment-151-1
ᾗ
294
mvp-comment-151-2
πρῶτα μὲν … εἶτα … ἔπειτα
295
ᾗ
296
mvp-comment-151-3
τὰ μητρὸς
297
mvp-comment-151-4
ἔχθιστα συμβέβηκεν
298
mvp-comment-152-1
κἀκ τῶνδ’ ἄρχομαι
299
mvp-comment-153-1
λαβεῖν … τὸ τητᾶσθαι
300
mvp-comment-154-1
ποίας
301
δοκεῖς
302
mvp-comment-155-1
ἴδω
303
εἰσίδω δ’
304
ἴδω δὲ
305
mvp-comment-155-2
μὲν
306
mvp-comment-156-1
ἐσθήματα
307
mvp-comment-156-2
ἐκείνῳ
308
mvp-comment-156-3
παρεστίους … λοιβάς
309
ἔνθ’ ἐκεῖνον ὤλεσεν
310
mvp-comment-156-4
Acc. to
Homer. Hymn. 29. 4 ff., feasts began and ended with libations to Hestia:
οὐ γὰρ ἄτερ σοῦ
|
εἰλαπίναι θνητοῖσιν, ἵν’ οὐ πρώτῃ πυμάτῃ τε
|
Ἱστίῃ ἀρχόμενος σπένδει μελιηδέα οἶνον
. Soph. fr. 658
<*> πρῷρα λοιβῆς Ἑστία
. Other divinities, including Zeus
σωτήρ
, were similarly honoured; then the paean was sung, and the
πότος
began ( Plat.
Symp.p. 176 A).
mvp-comment-157-1
τούτων
311
mvp-comment-158-1
αὐτοέντην
312
mvp-comment-158-2
Brunck first adopted
αὐτοέντην
313
αὐτοφόντην
314
mvp-comment-158-3
ἡμὶν
315
mvp-comment-159-1
ταλαίνῃ
316
mvp-comment-160-1
ταύτην … τῷδε
317
mvp-comment-161-1
μιάστορι
318
Ἐρινὺν
319
mvp-comment-162-1
ἐγγελῶσα τοῖς ποιουμένοις
320
mvp-comment-163-1
εὑροῦς’
321
τότε
322
mvp-comment-163-2
The conjecture
φρουροῦς’
323
τηροῦς’
324
mvp-comment-164-1
χοροὺς ἵστησι
325
mvp-comment-164-2
μηλοσφαγεῖ … ἱερὰ
326
mvp-comment-164-3
ἔμμην’ ἱερά
327
mvp-comment-164-4
τοῖς σωτηρίοις
328
mvp-comment-164-5
Argive tradition placed Agamemnon's death on the 13th of Gamelion (about the end of January). So said ‘the Argive historians’ (
οἱ Ἀργολικοὶ συγγραφεῖς
),— according to an Argive writer named Deinias, who lived about 225 B.C. (Schol. here: Müller,
Frag. Hist. vol. III. p. 25.) Possibly, then, the idea of Clytaemnestra's hideous festival may have been suggested to the poet by some actual commemoration of the event in Argolis. There was a cult of Agamemnon in various places,—notably in Laconia. (Cp. Roscher's
Lexicon, p. 96.)
mvp-comment-165-1
ἡ δύσμορος
329
κατὰ στέγας
330
mvp-comment-166-1
τέτηκα
331
mvp-comment-166-2
πατρὸς
332
mvp-comment-166-3
The
δαίς
is the feast which, in Homeric fashion (
Il. 1. 467
), would follow the sacrifice (281). Acc. to Eustathius p. 1507. 61 (on
Hom.
Od. 4. 524
ff.),
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαὶς
(or
τράπεζα
) was a proverb
ἐπὶ τῶν ἐπ’ ὀλέθρῳ εὐωχουμένων
. The poet may mean that Clytaemnestra called the festival
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαίς
, in direct allusion to
δεῖπνα ἄρρητα
(203): and this would give a special point to
ἐγγελῶσα
(277). Cp.
Eur.
Or. 1008
τά τ’ ἐπώνυμα δεῖπνα Θυέστου
. But the words do not necessarily imply more than that she called it
Ἀγαμεμνόνεια
.
mvp-comment-167-1
αὐτὴ πρὸς αὑτήν
333
αὑτήν
334
mvp-comment-167-2
κλαῦσαι
335
mvp-comment-167-3
ἡδονὴν φέρει
336
mvp-comment-168-1
ἡ λόγοισι γενναία
337
mvp-comment-169-1
φωνοῦσα
338
mvp-comment-170-1
δύσθεον
339
mvp-comment-170-2
μίσημα
340
mvp-comment-170-3
σοὶ μόνῃ
341
mvp-comment-170-4
τέθνηκεν
342
mvp-comment-170-5
ἐν πένθει
343
mvp-comment-171-1
ἐκ γόων
344
mvp-comment-171-2
οἱ κάτω θεοί
345
mvp-comment-172-1
τάδ’
346
mvp-comment-172-2
ἥξοντ’ Ὀρέστην
347
mvp-comment-173-1
παραστᾶς’
348
mvp-comment-174-1
ἥτις
349
mvp-comment-174-2
ὑπεξέθου
350
mvp-comment-175-1
ἀλλ’ ἴσθι τοι τείσουσά γ’
351
mvp-comment-176-1
ὑλακτεῖ
352
mvp-comment-176-2
σὺν
353
mvp-comment-176-3
πέλας
354
παρών
355
mvp-comment-176-4
301 The adv.
πάντα
356
mvp-comment-176-5
ἄναλκις
357
mvp-comment-176-6
ἡ πᾶσα βλάβη
358
mvp-comment-177-1
σὺν γυναιξὶ
359
mvp-comment-177-2
τὰς μάχας
360
mvp-comment-178-1
ἐφήξειν
361
mvp-comment-179-1
μέλλων … δρᾶν τι
362
mvp-comment-179-2
τὰς οὔσας τε … καὶ τὰς ἀπούσας
363
mvp-comment-179-3
μου
364
μοι
365
mvp-comment-179-4
διέφθορεν
366
mvp-comment-180-1
σωφρονεῖν
367
εὐσεβεῖν
368
mvp-comment-180-2
ἔν τοι κακοῖς
369
mvp-comment-180-3
πολλή )στ’ ἀνάγκη
370
κἀπιτηδεύειν κακά
371
mvp-comment-180-4
I place only a comma, not a colon, after
πάρεστιν
372
mvp-comment-181-1
ὄντος … βεβῶτος
373
mvp-comment-182-1
ἦ κάρτα
374
mvp-comment-182-2
θυραῖον
375
mvp-comment-182-3
οἰχνεῖν
376
mvp-comment-182-4
ἀγροῖσι
377
mvp-comment-182-5
τυγχάνει
378
mvp-comment-183-1
ἦ κἂν … ἱκοίμην
379
ἦ τ<*>ν
380
ἦ δἂν
381
mvp-comment-183-2
ἐς λόγους τοὺς σοὺς ἱκοίμην
382
mvp-comment-184-1
ὡς νῦν
383
ὥς νυν
384
mvp-comment-184-2
ἱστόρει· τί σοι φίλον
385
τό
386
τά
387
mvp-comment-184-3
With the other punctuation,
ἱστόρει τί σοι φίλον
388
mvp-comment-185-1
καὶ δὴ
389
mvp-comment-185-2
τοῦ κασιγνήτου τί φής
390
mvp-comment-185-3
ἥξοντος
391
ἢ μέλλοντος
392
mvp-comment-186-1
φησίν γε
393
mvp-comment-186-2
ποεῖ
394
mvp-comment-187-1
καὶ μὴν ἔγωγ’
395
γε
396
mvp-comment-187-2
οὐκ ὄκνῳ
397
mvp-comment-188-1
ἀρκεῖν
398
mvp-comment-189-1
ἐπεί
399
mvp-comment-189-2
μακρὰν
400
mvp-comment-189-3
324 Here, as in 316,
νῦν
401
νυν
402
mvp-comment-189-4
δόμων
403
φέρουσαν
404
mvp-comment-190-1
ὅμαιμον
405
mvp-comment-190-2
φύσιν
406
mvp-comment-191-1
Χρυσόθεμιν
407
mvp-comment-192-1
οἷα
408
νομίζεται
409
mvp-comment-193-1
πρὸς θυρῶνος ἐξόδοις
410
φωνεῖς
411
ἐλθοῦσα
412
αὖ
413
mvp-comment-193-2
330 For the absence of caesura, cp.
Ph. 101
n.
mvp-comment-194-1
θυμῷ … χαρίζεσθαι
414
mvp-comment-195-1
καίτοι τοσοῦτόν γ’ οἶδα
415
mvp-comment-195-2
κἀμαυτήν, ὅτι
416
mvp-comment-195-3
333 f. For the repeated
ἄν
417
mvp-comment-195-4
οἶ) αὐτοῖς φρονῶ
418
mvp-comment-196-1
ὑφειμένῃ
419
πλεῖν
420
mvp-comment-196-2
For the image, cp.
Eur.
Med. 524
ἄκροισι λαίφους κρασπέδοις
(with close-reefed sails)
ὑπεκφυγεῖν
|
τὴν σὴν στόμαργον, ὦ γύναι, γλωσσαλγίαν
:
Ar.
Ran. 997
ἀλλ’ ὅπως, ὦ γεννάδα
, |
μὴ πρὸς ὀργὴν ἀντιλέξεις
, |
ἀλλὰ συστείλας, ἄκροισι
|
χρώμενος τοῖς ἱστίοις κ.τ.λ.
: and conversely
Soph.
Ant. 715
ναὸς ὅστις ἐγκρατῆ πόδα
|
τείνας ὑπείκει μηδέν
.
Ovid
Epist. 1. 8. 71
moderatius opta, | Et voti, quaeso, contrahe vela tui.
Shakesp.
Henry VI., pt. iii, act 3 sc. 3. 5
‘Now Margaret | Must strike her sail, and learn awhile to serve | Where kings command.’
mvp-comment-197-1
καὶ μὴ δοκεῖν
421
mvp-comment-198-1
τοιαῦτα δ’ ἄλλα
422
ἀλλὰ
423
ἄλλα
424
mvp-comment-199-1
καίτοι τὸ μὲν δίκαιον
425
mvp-comment-199-2
κρίνεις
426
mvp-comment-199-3
εἰ … με δεῖ
427
mvp-comment-199-4
ἐλευθέραν
428
mvp-comment-199-5
ζῆν
429
mvp-comment-199-6
πάντ’
430
mvp-comment-199-7
ἀκουστέα
431
mvp-comment-200-1
δεινόν γε
432
mvp-comment-201-1
τῆς … τικτούσης
433
mvp-comment-201-2
μέλειν
434
mvp-comment-202-1
τἀμὰ νουθετήματα
435
mvp-comment-202-2
κείνης διδακτά
436
mvp-comment-202-3
ἐκ σαυτῆς
437
mvp-comment-203-1
The text, which has been suspected (cr. n.), is sound; but the train of thought is somewhat obscured by compression.
mvp-comment-203-2
‘You forget your father, and care only for your mother. All your counsels to me come from her. Then (
ἔπειτα
),—that being so,—give up the attempt at a compromise. Make a
choice (
ἑλοῦ γε
). You can be imprudent (
φρονεῖν κακῶς
),—as you say that I am,—and loyal to your dead father. Or you can be prudent (
φρονοῦσα
), and forgetful of him,—as you actually are; you who (
ἥτις
) say, indeed, that you would show your hatred of the murderers if you could; and yet, when I
do resist them, you try to turn me from my purpose. You merely add the shame of cowardice to our woes.’
mvp-comment-203-3
ἔπειθ’
438
mvp-comment-203-4
ἑλοῦ γε
439
mvp-comment-203-5
φρονεῖν κακῶς
440
mvp-comment-203-6
Other explanations are:—(1) ‘Choose to be thought either
lost to right feeling, or, if you have such feeling, then at least
forgetful of your duty.’ (2) ‘Choose to seem either
unintelligent (if you are merely the blind instrument of our rulers); or, if you act with clear understanding (
φρονοῦσα
),—thinking to benefit me,—at least forgetful of your father.’ Both these views assume that the question is merely between two interpretations which might be placed on the present conduct of Chrysothemis. But Electra is putting the dilemma between imprudent loyalty and prudent disloyalty.
mvp-comment-204-1
τῶν φίλων
441
mvp-comment-205-1
ἥτις
442
φρονοῦσα
443
μῖσος
444
mvp-comment-206-1
πάντα
445
mvp-comment-206-2
τιμωρουμένης
446
mvp-comment-207-1
οὔτε … τε
447
mvp-comment-207-2
τήν τε δρῶσαν
448
mvp-comment-208-1
πρὸς κακοῖσι
449
mvp-comment-208-2
δειλίαν ἔχει
450
mvp-comment-209-1
ἐπεὶ
451
mvp-comment-209-2
ἢ μάθ’ ἐξ ἐμοῦ
452
mvp-comment-210-1
ἐπαρκούντως
453
mvp-comment-211-1
προσάπτειν
454
mvp-comment-211-2
εἴ τις ἔστ’ ἐκεῖ χάρις
455
mvp-comment-212-1
ἡμὶν
456
ξύνει
457
mvp-comment-213-1
τὰ σὰ … δῶῤ
458
mvp-comment-213-2
ἐφ’ οἶσι
459
mvp-comment-213-3
χλιδᾷς
460
mvp-comment-214-1
ὑπεικάθοιμι
461
mvp-comment-214-2
πλουσία
462
mvp-comment-214-3
περιρρείτω
463
mvp-comment-215-1
τοὐμὲ μὴ λυπεῖν
464
mvp-comment-215-2
Remark the resemblance to the passage where Antigone—summing up her position—compares the
moral pain of neglecting her duty with those penalties which she contemns:—
κείνοις ἂν ἤλγουν· τοῖσδε δ’ οὐκ ἀλγύνομαι
(
Ant. 468
). There, too, we have a Sophoclean triad of clauses, the third echoing the first,—as
τῆς σῆς δ’ οὐκ ἐρῶ τιμῆς τυχεῖν
here reiterates the sense of
σοὶ δὲ πλουσία... βίος
(n. on
Ant. 465
ff.).
mvp-comment-215-3
One of the scholia recognises the traditional reading, and explains it correctly: —
τοῦτο μόνον ἐμὲ βοσκέτω, τὸ μὴ λυπεῖν ἐμὲ αὐτήν, εἰ
(‘as I should do, if’)
τοῖς φονεῦσι τοῦ πατρὸς πείθεσθαι ἀναγκασθήσομαι
.—The conjectures have been numerous: see Appendix.
mvp-comment-216-1
οὐδ’ ἂν σὺ
465
mvp-comment-217-1
παῖδα
466
mvp-comment-217-2
κεκλῆσθαι
467
mvp-comment-218-1
πλείστοις
468
mvp-comment-219-1
μηδὲν
469
πρὸς ὀργὴν
470
mvp-comment-220-1
ἀμφοῖν
471
τοῖς λόγοις
472
mvp-comment-221-1
τῆσδε … αὕτη
473
πάλιν
474
mvp-comment-222-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
475
mvp-comment-222-2
πως
476
mvp-comment-222-3
μύθων
477
mvp-comment-223-1
οὐδ’
478
κοὐδ’
479
ποτέ
480
mvp-comment-224-1
ἰὸν
481
mvp-comment-224-2
σχήσει
482
mvp-comment-225-1
τὸ δεινὸν
483
mvp-comment-225-2
εἰ γὰρ τῶνδέ μοι
484
εἰ
485
mvp-comment-226-1
γὰρ
486
mvp-comment-226-2
γόων
487
λόγων
488
mvp-comment-227-1
ἐνταῦθα
489
mvp-comment-227-2
ἔνθα μή ποτε … προσόψει
490
mvp-comment-227-3
ζῶσα
491
mvp-comment-227-4
κατηρεφεῖ
492
mvp-comment-227-5
χθονὸς τῆσδ’ ἐκτὸς
493
mvp-comment-227-6
ὑμνήσεις
494
mvp-comment-228-1
πρὸς ταῦτα
495
mvp-comment-228-2
Nauck reads
κοὔ
496
καί
497
mvp-comment-228-3
ἐν καλῷ, εὔκαιρον
schol.:
H. 4. 3. 5
νομίσαντες οὐκ ἐν καλῷ εἶναι πρὸς τοὺς ὁπλίτας ἱππομαχεῖν
: so, too,
Eur.
Heracl. 971
, etc. Cp.
καλόν
(
ἐστι
)=
καίριον
in
Soph.
Ph. 1155
; and
εἰς καλόν
=
καιρίως
in
O.T. 78.
mvp-comment-229-1
ἦ ταῦτα δὴ
498
ἦ … δὴ
499
ἦ … γὰρ
500
mvp-comment-229-2
καὶ βεβούλευνται
501
mvp-comment-230-1
ἀλλ’ ἐξίκοιτο
502
mvp-comment-230-2
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκ’
503
mvp-comment-231-1
τίνα … τόνδ’
504
mvp-comment-231-2
τάλαινα
505
mvp-comment-232-1
εἴ τι τῶνδε
506
mvp-comment-233-1
ποῦ ποτ’ εἶ φρενῶν
507
mvp-comment-234-1
ὅπως
508
ὑμῶν
509
mvp-comment-234-2
προσώτατ’
510
προσωτάτω φύγω
511
mvp-comment-235-1
βίου … τοῦ παρόντος
512
mvp-comment-236-1
καλὸς γὰρ
513
mvp-comment-236-2
θαυμάσαι
514
mvp-comment-237-1
τοῖς φίλοις
515
mvp-comment-238-1
εἰκαθεῖν
516
mvp-comment-239-1
ταῦτα
517
οὐκ ἐμοὺς
518
mvp-comment-240-1
γε
519
μέντοι
520
mvp-comment-240-2
μὴ )ξ
521
mvp-comment-240-3
πεσεῖν
522
mvp-comment-240-4
399 A woman, speaking of herself in the plur., uses the masc.:
Ant. 926
παθόντες ἂν ξυγγνοῖμεν ἡμαρτηκότες
.
mvp-comment-241-1
συγγνώμην
523
mvp-comment-242-1
τἄπη
524
mvp-comment-242-2
πρὸς κακῶν
525
mvp-comment-243-1
μή πω
526
mvp-comment-244-1
οἷπερ … ὁδοῦ
527
mvp-comment-245-1
τῷ φέρεις
528
mvp-comment-245-2
ἔμπυρα
529
mvp-comment-246-1
τυμβεῦσαι χοάς
530
mvp-comment-247-1
βροτῶν
531
mvp-comment-248-1
ὃν ἔκταν’ αὐτή
532
ὅν γ’
533
mvp-comment-249-1
τῷ τοῦτ’ ἤρεσεν
534
mvp-comment-250-1
δείματος
535
mvp-comment-250-2
δοκεῖν ἐμοί
536
mvp-comment-251-1
θεοὶ πατρῷοι
537
mvp-comment-251-2
συγγένεσθέ γ’
538
mvp-comment-251-3
ἀλλὰ νῦν
539
mvp-comment-252-1
εἴποιμ’ ἂν τότε
540
mvp-comment-253-1
ἐπὶ σμικρὸν
541
ἐπὶ σμικρῶν
542
mvp-comment-253-2
φράσαι
543
mvp-comment-254-1
σμικροὶ λόγοι
544
mvp-comment-255-1
πατρὸς … δευτέραν ὁμιλίαν
545
mvp-comment-255-2
ἐφέστιον πῆξαι
546
mvp-comment-255-3
This sceptre is described in the
Iliad (2. 101 f.) as the work of Hephaestus, who gave it Zeus; Hermes transmitted it to Pelops, from whom it passed to Atreus and Agamemnon. The Homeric sceptre is often called
χρύσεον
(
Il. 2. 268
, etc.), prob. as being ornamented with gold foil, or studded with gold nails (
Il. 1. 246
χρυσείοις ἥλοισι πεπαρμένον
). Among the objects found at Mycenae are some supposed remains of such sceptres (Schliem.,
Myc. 201, etc.).
mvp-comment-255-4
οὑφόρει ποτέ
547
mvp-comment-256-1
ἔκ τε
548
ἐκ δὲ
549
mvp-comment-256-2
βρύοντα
550
mvp-comment-256-3
ᾧ … γενέσθαι
551
mvp-comment-256-4
The vision resembles that of Astyages, who dreamed that a vine sprang from his daughter Mandanè, the wife of Cambyses,
τὴν δὲ ἄμπελον ἐπισχεῖν τὴν Ἀσίην πᾶσαν
. The
ὀνειροπόλοι
explained this to mean that her son (Cyrus) should reign in his grandfather's stead. (
Her. 1. 108.
) The spreading branches figure also in the dream of Xerxes (7. 19):
ἐδόκεε...ἐστεφανῶσθαι ἐλαίης θαλλῷ, ἀπὸ δὲ τῆς ἐλαίης τοὺς κλάδους γῆν πᾶσαν ἐπισχεῖν
.
mvp-comment-256-5
In choosing the
sceptre of Agamemnon as the stock from which the wondrous growth is put forth, Sophocles may have had in mind the words of Achilles (
Il. 1. 234
ff.);
ναὶ μὰ τόδε σκῆπτρον· τὸ μὲν οὔποτε φύλλα καὶ ὄζους
|
φύσει, ἐπεὶ δὴ πρῶτα τομὴν ἐν ὄρεσσι λέλοιπεν
, |
οὐδ’ ἀναθηλήσει
.
mvp-comment-257-1
του παρόντος
552
τοῦ
553
παρόντος
554
του
555
mvp-comment-257-2
Ἡλίῳ δείκνυσι τοὖναρ
556
mvp-comment-258-1
οὐ κάτοιδα, πλὴν
557
mvp-comment-258-2
πέμπει με κείνη
558
mvp-comment-259-1
These three verses, which the MSS. give to Electra, and which several recent critics reject (cr. n.), clearly belong to Chrysothemis, and are genuine. Electra's exclamation of joy (411) caused Chrysothemis to ask if her sister had any ground for hope (412). Electra replied that, when she had heard the dream, she would say. This showed her sister that Electra relied merely on the fact that Clytaemnestra had seen
some fearful vision. Now, therefore, instead of asking for Electra's interpretation, she merely repeats her counsel (383 f.) before proceeding on her errand. The words
πρός
νυν θεῶν κ.τ.λ.
(428 ff.) show the train of her thought. To Chrysothemis, the alarm of Clytaemnestra (427) is more important than the apparition of Agamemnon. The dream is only a new reason why Electra should be cautious,—not why she should hope.
mvp-comment-259-2
The current ascription of the verses to Electra was doubtless prompted by verse 413. It was supposed that the recital of Chrysothemis must be immediately followed by the comments of Electra. But, as Hermann observed, the phrase
ἀβουλίᾳ πεσεῖν
would alone suffice to show that the verses belong to Chrysothemis (
cp. 398
). Nor could the warning,
σὺν κακῷ μέτει πάλιν
, be fitly uttered by Electra.
mvp-comment-259-3
τῶν ἐγγενῶν
559
mvp-comment-260-1
ἀβουλίᾳ
560
mvp-comment-260-2
σὺν κακῷ
561
mvp-comment-260-3
μέτει
562
mvp-comment-261-1
ἀλλ’
563
mvp-comment-261-2
ὦ φίλη
564
τούτων μὲν
565
mvp-comment-262-1
οὐ … θέμις
566
οὐδ’ ὅσιον
567
mvp-comment-262-2
ἐχθρᾶς ἀπὸ γυναικὸς
568
mvp-comment-262-3
κτερίσματ’
569
mvp-comment-262-4
λουτρὰ
570
mvp-comment-263-1
ἀλλ’ ἢ πνοαῖσιν
571
ῥοαῖσιν
572
mvp-comment-263-2
κρύψον
573
mvp-comment-263-3
νιν
574
mvp-comment-263-4
ἔνθα μή ποτ’
575
ἔνθεν
576
mvp-comment-263-5
εὐνὴν
577
mvp-comment-264-1
ἀλλ’ ὅταν θάῃν
578
mvp-comment-264-2
The conjecture
ἔστ’ ἂν
579
ὅταν
580
σῳζέσθω
581
mvp-comment-264-3
κειμήλἰ
582
mvp-comment-265-1
ἀρχὴν
583
τλημονεστάτη
584
mvp-comment-266-1
ἔβλαστε
585
mvp-comment-267-1
ὅν γ’ … τῷδ’
586
mvp-comment-267-2
ἐπέστεφε
587
mvp-comment-267-3
442 f. The position of
αὐτῇ
588
mvp-comment-267-4
δέξεσθαι
589
mvp-comment-267-5
It seems, then, a reasonable inference that here, where the reference is to future time, he would have written
δέξεσθαι
590
δέξασθαι
591
mvp-comment-267-6
444 ff. Join
θανὼν ἄτιμος
592
mvp-comment-267-7
ἐμασχαλίσθη
593
mvp-comment-267-8
Two different motives are assigned by the Greek commentators; viz.:—(1) the desire to render the dead incapable of wreaking vengeance (
ὥσπερ τὴν δύναμιν ἐκείνων ἀφαιρούμενοι
): (2) the desire to make an atonement (
ἐξιλάσασθαι τὴν δολοφονίαν—ἀφοσιοῦσθαι τὸν φόνον
). There can be little doubt that the first of these motives was the primitive origin of the custom. If the second was afterwards blended with it, the idea may have been that of offering the severed portions to the gods below,—as a victim was devoted to death by cutting off a lock of hair (
Eur.
Alc. 75
). Apollonius Rhodius seems to present the practice in this light (4. 477): Jason, having slain a foe,
ἐξάργματα τάμνε θανόντος
. Cp.
Etym. Magn.:
ἀπάργματα λέγεται τὰ ὑπὸ τῶν τραγῳδῶν λεγόμενα μασχαλίσματα
.
mvp-comment-267-9
κἀπὶ λουτροῖσιν
594
mvp-comment-267-10
ἐξέμαξ ν
595
mvp-comment-267-11
ἆρα μὴ
596
mvp-comment-268-1
οὐκ ἔστιν
597
mvp-comment-268-2
ταῦτα μὲν μέθες· σὺ δὲ
598
mvp-comment-269-1
βοστρύχων ἄκρας φόβας
599
mvp-comment-269-2
κἀμοῦ ταλαίνης
600
mvp-comment-270-1
†ἀλιπαρῆ
601
λιπαρῆ
602
mvp-comment-270-2
We come, therefore, to a dilemma. (1) The words
τήνδ’ ἀλιπαρῆ τρίχα
may conceal some corruption:
τήνδ’
ought possibly to be
τήνδε τ’
603
ἀλίπαρον
604
mvp-comment-270-3
(2) Or else, if the text be sound,
ἀλιπαρῆ
may mean
οὐ λιπαράν
. There is no doubt that
λιπ
, ‘fat,’ is the root both of
λι^παρός
, ‘shining,’ and of
λι—παρής
, ‘sticking’; cp.
Plat.
Crat. 427 B
τὸ λιπαρὸν καὶ τὸ κολλῶδες
(
Curt.
Etym. § 340
). Similarly
γλίσχρος
, ‘sticky,’ came to mean ‘importunate.’ It is barely possible that, in coining a new negative compound, the poet may have transferred the sense of
λιπαρός
to
λιπαρής
: but it seems improbable.
mvp-comment-271-1
ζῶμα
605
mvp-comment-271-2
χλιδαῖς
606
mvp-comment-272-1
προσπίτνουσα
607
αὐτὸν
608
mvp-comment-273-1
ἐξ ὑπερτέρας χερός
609
mvp-comment-273-2
ζῶντ’
610
mvp-comment-274-1
ἀφνεωτέραις
611
mvp-comment-274-2
στέφωμεν
612
mvp-comment-274-3
δωρούμεθα
613
mvp-comment-275-1
οἶμαι μὲν οὖν
614
mvp-comment-275-2
If
μέλον
615
μέλειν
616
μέλον
617
mvp-comment-276-1
σοί
618
mvp-comment-277-1
βροτῶν
619
mvp-comment-278-1
πρὸς εὐσέβειαν
620
mvp-comment-279-1
δράσω
621
mvp-comment-279-2
τὸ γὰρ δίκαιον
622
mvp-comment-279-3
(1)
τὸ δίκαιον
is an acc. of general reference, and
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
is impersonal. ‘With regard to what is (clearly) right, it is unreasonable for two persons to dispute; rather both should hasten on the doing (of it).’ With
ἀλλ’ ἐπισπεύδειν
we supply the notion
δεῖ
from the negative
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
(as from
οὐκ ἔξεστι
in
O. C. 1402
ff.; cp.
O. T. 817
ff.). For the form of the sentence, cp.
H. 7. 3. 7
τοὺς περὶ Ἀρχίαν...οὐ ψῆφον ἀνεμείνατε, ἀλλὰ ὁπότε πρῶτον ἐδυνάσθητε ἐτιμωρήσασθε
. So here the acc.
τὸ δίκαιον
, which represents the object of
δρᾶν
, is separated from it by the parenthesis
οὐκ
ἔχει λόγον δυοῖν ἐρίζειν
. (The first scholium gives substantially this view:
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον φιλονεικεῖν περὶ τοῦ δικαίου, ὥστε περὶ αὐτοῦ δύο ὄντας ἐρίζειν
.)
mvp-comment-279-4
(2) Or
τὸ δίκαιον
might be nom.: ‘that which is clearly right does not
afford any ground (
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
) for two persons to dispute,’ etc. So the second schol.:
ἢ τὸ οὐκ ἔχει λόγον ἀντὶ τοῦ οὐ παρέχει πρόφασιν
. So far as the verb
ἔχει
is concerned, this sense is quite admissible: cp.
Thuc. 2. 41
οὔτε τῷ πολεμίῳ ἐπελθόντι ἀγανάκτησιν ἔχει
(
ἡ πόλις
). The objection is that the phrases
ἔχειν λόγον, οὐκ ἔχειν λόγον
, which are very common, regularly mean, ‘to be reasonable,’ ‘to be unreasonable.’ This is so both in the personal and in the impersonal constr.; as Plat.
Phaedop. 62 D
τὸ γὰρ μὴ ἀγανακτεῖν...οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
:
Dem. or. 36 § 54
πῶς ἔχει λόγον σὲ...δίκην ἀξιοῦν λαμβάνειν
; The supposed sense, ‘not to
afford a reason,’ is unexampled.
mvp-comment-279-5
δυοῖν
623
mvp-comment-280-1
παρ’ ὑμῶν
624
mvp-comment-281-1
πικρὰν
625
δοκῶ με … τολμήσειν
626
ἔτι
627
mvp-comment-282-1
εἰ μὴ )γὼ
628
mvp-comment-282-2
γνώμας λειπομένα
629
mvp-comment-283-1
ἁ πρόμαντις Δίκα
630
mvp-comment-283-2
δίκαια φερομένα χεροῖν κράτη
631
mvp-comment-284-1
μέτεισιν
632
mvp-comment-284-2
οὐ μακροῦ χρόνου
633
mvp-comment-285-1
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
634
κλύουσαν
635
mvp-comment-285-2
ἁδυπνόων … ὀνειράτων
636
mvp-comment-286-1
ἀμναστεῖ γ’ ὁ φύσας ς’
637
mvp-comment-287-1
χαλκόπλακτος
638
mvp-comment-287-2
γένυς
639
mvp-comment-287-3
The very axe (
φόνιος πέλεκυς
, 99) with which the blow was dealt is imagined as nourishing a grudge against the murderers who had set it such a task. Such a personification recalls that practice of Athenian law by which inanimate objects which had caused death were brought to a formal trial in the court called
τὸ ἐπὶ Πρυτανείῳ
, and, after sentence, cast beyond the boundaries, in the presence of the Archon Basileus and the sacrificial officers of the tribes (
φυλο‐
βασιλεῖς
). Aeschin. or. 3 § 244
τὰ μὲν ξύλα καὶ τοὺς λίθους καὶ τὸν σίδηρον, τὰ ἄφωνα καὶ ἀγνώμονα, ἐάν τῳ ἐμπεσόντα ἀποκτείνῃ, ὑπερορίζομεν
. (Cp.
Dem. or. 23 § 76
.) A like conception was implied in the English law (repealed in 1846) of ‘deodands’ (Deo danda),
i.e., personal chattels (whether animals or things) which, having caused the death of a human being, were forfeited to the Crown for pious uses.
mvp-comment-288-1
ἐν αἰκίαις
640
mvp-comment-289-1
καὶ πολύπους καὶ πολύχειρ
641
mvp-comment-290-1
λόχοις
642
mvp-comment-290-2
χαλκόπους
643
mvp-comment-291-1
ἄλεκτρ’ ἄνυμφα
644
mvp-comment-291-2
γάμων ἁμιλλήμαθ’
645
mvp-comment-291-3
ἐπέβα
646
mvp-comment-292-1
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι … συνδρῶσιν
647
mvp-comment-292-2
Verses 495—497 (
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι...τέρας
) answer metrically to vv. 479—481
ὕπεστί μοι...ὀνειράτων
, where the text is certain, save for the doubt whether
θράσος
or
θάρσος
should stand in 479. Here we must first decide two points.
mvp-comment-292-3
(1) Are the words
πρὸ τῶνδε
648
mvp-comment-292-4
(2) Could
ἔχει με, μήποτε τέρας πελᾶν
(etc.) mean, ‘
the belief possesses me, that’ etc.? Surely not. No real parallel for so strange a phrase has been produced. It is irrelevant to quote those impersonal verbs which directly express the
occurrence of a thought to the mind; as
Xen.
An. 6. 1. 17
εἰσῄει αὐτοὺς ὅπως ἂν καὶ ἔχοντές τι οἴκαδε ἀφίκοιντο
(‘the thought came to them, how they might,’ etc.):
Thuc. 6. 78.
§ 1
εἰ δέ τῳ ἄρα παρέστηκε, τὸν μὲν Συρακόσιον...πολέμιον εἶναι κ.τ.λ.
Either, then, the subject to
ἔχει
has dropped out, or the words
μ’ ἔχει
conceal a corruption.
mvp-comment-292-5
The following remedies are possible: I incline to the first, as involving least change. (1) Reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
, we may read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοί μ’ ἔχει
|
<θάρσος τι>, μήποθ’ ἡμῖν
etc. (It may be remarked that
τι
is in harmony with the tone of
ὕπεστί μοι
in 479.) Another available word is
ξύννοια
(cp.
Ant. 279
). (2) Or, reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θάρσος
, we could read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι θάρσος ἴσχει με
. On either view, the
υ
of
ἁδυπνόων
in 480 is long (as several critics have assumed). It should be noted that (1) involves a different constitution of the verses: see p. lxxxii.
mvp-comment-292-6
In those MSS. which have
μή ποτε μή ποθ’ ἡμῖν
649
mvp-comment-293-1
ἀψεγές
650
ἀψεφές
651
mvp-comment-293-2
πελᾶν
652
mvp-comment-294-1
τοῖς δρῶσι
653
τοῖς συνδρῶσιν
654
mvp-comment-295-1
μαντεῖαι βροτῶν
655
mvp-comment-296-1
εὖ κατασχήσει
656
mvp-comment-297-1
ἱππεία
657
mvp-comment-297-2
Oenomaüs, king of Pisa in Elis, had promised the hand of his daughter Hippodameia to the suitor who should defeat him in a chariot-race; the penalty of failure being death. The young Pelops, son of Tantalus, offered himself as a competitor. Myrtilus, the charioteer of Oenomaüs, was persuaded (either by Hippodameia or by Pelops) to betray his master. He did so by leaving out one or both of the linch-pins by which the naves of the chariot-wheels were secured to the axles.
Tzetzes on Lycophron 156
ταῖς χοινίκισι
(=
πλήμναις
, the naves)
τῶν τροχῶν οὐκ ἐμβαλὼν τοὺς ἥλους
. According to another story, he substituted a linch-pin of wax for a real one (
schol. Apoll. Rh. 752
ἐμβαλόντα κήρινον ἔμβολον ἐπὶ τοῦ ἀκραξονίου
). So Pelops won the race, and the bride. But Oenomaüs was soon avenged on the traitor; for Myrtilus insulted Hippodameia, and was thrown into the sea by Pelops; upon whose house he invoked a curse, as he sank.
mvp-comment-297-3
Euripides, too, (
Or. 990
ff.,
Helen. 386 f.) refers to this chariot-race as the event with which the troubles of the Pelopidae began. Apollonius Rhodius briefly describes the critical moment of the race as one of the subjects embroidered on the cloak of Jason (1. 752 ff.); there Oenomaüs was seen, ‘falling sideways, as the axle broke at the naves of the wheels,’—
ἄξονος ἐν πλήμνῃσι παρακλιδὸν ἀγνυμένοιο
|
πίπτεν
.
mvp-comment-297-4
The eastern pediment of the temple of Zeus at Olympia (
circ. 450 B.C.) was adorned with sculptures by Paeonius, representing the preparation for this contest (
Paus. 5. 10. 6
). The fragments found on the site have sufficed for a reconstruction of the group. Zeus occupied the centre; to the right of him were Pelops and Hippodameia; to the left, Oenomaüs and his wife Steropè. On each side was a chariot drawn by four horses. Myrtilus was sitting in front of his team, with his face turned away from his master.
mvp-comment-297-5
In the older and nobler form of the myth, Pelops won, not by a fraud, but by the grace of Poseidon, who gave him winged horses (Pindar
O. 1. 87
ἔδωκεν δίφρον τε χούσεον πτεροῖσίν τ’ ἀκάμαντας ἵππους
). On the chest (
λάρναξ
) of Cypselus, seen by Pausanias in the Heraeum at Olympia (
Paus. 5. 17. 5
), Pelops was driving two winged horses.
mvp-comment-298-1
αἰανὴς
658
mvp-comment-298-2
The form
αἰανὴς
has the best authority, and some critics hold that
αἰανὸς
(Hesych.) was a Byzantine invention. But in
Aesch.
Eum. 416
,
ἡμεῖς γάρ ἐσμεν νυκτὸς αἰανῆς τέκνα
(so L, schol., and Tzetzes on Lycophron 406),
αἰανῆ
is far less suitable.
mvp-comment-299-1
εὖτε
659
mvp-comment-299-2
ὁ ποντισθεὶς Μυρτίλος
660
mvp-comment-299-3
A vase found at Capua shows Pelops and Hippodameia in a ship, from which Myrtilus is falling backwards into the water. A winged Erinys hovers in the air above, brandishing a sword over the head of Pelops (Baumeister,
Denkmäler p. 1204, referring to
Mon. Inst. x. 25).
mvp-comment-299-4
ἐκοιμάθη
661
mvp-comment-300-1
παγχρυσέων δίφρων
662
mvp-comment-301-1
πρόρριζος
663
mvp-comment-301-2
ἐκριφθείς
664
mvp-comment-302-1
ἔλειπεν
665
ἔλιπεν
666
οἴκου
667
οἴκους
668
πω
669
mvp-comment-303-1
πολύπονος
670
αἰκία
671
mvp-comment-304-1
ἀνειμένη
672
μέν
673
mvp-comment-304-2
ὡς ἔοικας
674
mvp-comment-304-3
στρέφει
675
mvp-comment-304-4
Clytaemnestra begins in the same strain as Chrysothemis, who likewise emphasised her reproof by the word
αὖ
676
mvp-comment-305-1
μή τοι θυραίαν γ’
677
mvp-comment-305-2
αἰσχύνειν φίλους
678
mvp-comment-306-1
καίτοι
679
mvp-comment-306-2
δὴ
680
πολλούς
681
mvp-comment-306-3
ἐξεῖπάς με … ὡς
682
mvp-comment-306-4
θρασεῖα
683
τραχεῖα
684
mvp-comment-306-5
ἄρχω
685
mvp-comment-307-1
ὕβριν … οὐκ ἔχω
686
κακῶς κλύουσα
687
mvp-comment-308-1
πατὴρ γάρ
688
mvp-comment-308-2
πρόσχημα
689
mvp-comment-309-1
ἡ γὰρ Δίκη
690
mvp-comment-310-1
ᾗ χρῆν σ’ ἀρήγειν
691
mvp-comment-311-1
The order of words in the MSS.,
ἐπεὶ πατὴρ οὗτος σός
, is probably right; the words would then fall from her with a certain deliberate bitterness.
Cp. 542
:
Ant. 44
ἦ γὰρ νοεῖς θάπτειν σθ’
(n.):
Ph. 101
λέγω σ’ ἐγὼ δόλῳ Φιλοκτήτην λαβεῖν
.
mvp-comment-312-1
μοῦνος
692
Ἑλλήνων
693
mvp-comment-312-2
Nauck requires
τὴν αὐτὸς αὑτοῦ
instead of
τὴν σὴν ὅμαιμον
, because Agamemnon's unique crime was the slaughter of his own child: as if the text did not convey this. Clytaemnestra means, ‘while mourning a father, you forget a sister.’
mvp-comment-312-3
532 f. The regular mode of expression would be,
οὐκ ἴσον λύπης καμὼν ἐμοί, ὁ σπείρας τῇ τικτούσῃ
. But, having written
ὅτ’ ἔσπειρε
, the poet explains
ἐμοί
by repeating the comparison in a new form,
ὥσπερ ἡ τίκτουσ’ ἐγώ
. (For
ὡς
or
ὥσπερ
after
ἴσος
, cp.
Lys. or. 19 § 36
ἡγοῦντο... τὰ ἐκεῖ...εἶναι ἴσα ὥσπερ τὰ ἐνθάδε
.) Those who reject v. 533 omit to notice that, without it, the words
οὐκ ἴσον καμὼν ἐμοί
would be unintelligible. Cp.
Aesch.
Ag. 1417
ἔθυσεν αὑτοῦ παῖδα, φιλτάτην ἐμοὶ
|
ὠδῖν’
.
mvp-comment-312-4
This assertion of the mother's superior claim is a counterpart to the doctrine of Athena in
Aesch.
Eum. 658
f.,
οὐκ ἔστι μήτηρ ἡ κεκλημένου τέκνου
|
τοκεύς, τροφὸς δὲ κύματος νεοσπόρου
. Cp. above,
Aesch. Eum. 366
n.
mvp-comment-313-1
τοῦ χάριν, τίνων
694
mvp-comment-313-2
The alternative, which most editors have preferred, is to take
τίνων
as the participle. But there is an insuperable objection to this, which seems to have escaped notice. The words,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could mean only, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
for what?’ They could not mean, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
to whom?’ The latter would be
τῷ χάριν τίνων
; See (
e.g.)
Aesch.
P. V. 985
καὶ μὴν ὀφείλων ἂν τίνοιμ’ αὐτῷ χάριν
:
Aesch.
Ag. 821
τούτων θεοῖσι χρὴ πολύμνηστον χάριν
|
τίνειν
. Hence the question,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could not possibly be answered by
Ἀργείων
. For, evidently, the latter word could not mean, (‘for a benefit conferred by) the Greeks.’ A scholiast in the Baroccian MS. (cr. n. on 545), who explains
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
by
τίνος χάριν ἀποδιδούς
, plainly meant, ‘showing gratitude for what?’—and his paraphrase was correct; only he overlooked the context.
mvp-comment-314-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ μετῆν
695
mvp-comment-315-1
ἀλλ’ ἀντ’ ἀδελφοῦ δῆτα
696
κτανὼν
697
mvp-comment-315-2
ἀντὶ ἀδελφοῦ
698
mvp-comment-315-3
τἄμ’
699
mvp-comment-316-1
παῖδες … διπλοῖ
700
mvp-comment-316-2
540 f. Nauck would prefer a single verse in place of these two, viz.
οὓς Ἰφιγενείας εἰκὸς ἦν θνῄσκειν πάρος
.
mvp-comment-317-1
ἢ
701
mvp-comment-317-2
ἢ τῶν ἐμῶν Ἅιδης
702
mvp-comment-318-1
δαίσασθαι
703
mvp-comment-318-2
The conj.
λῄσασθαι
704
mvp-comment-319-1
πανώλει
705
mvp-comment-319-2
παρεῖτο
706
mvp-comment-319-3
The sense does not absolutely require us to take
Μενέλεω δ’
707
mvp-comment-320-1
ἀβούλου
708
mvp-comment-320-2
κακοῦ γνώμην
709
mvp-comment-321-1
δοκῶ μέν
710
mvp-comment-321-2
εἰ καὶ
711
mvp-comment-322-1
εἰ φωνὴν λάβοι
712
mvp-comment-323-1
τοῖς πεπραγμένοις
713
mvp-comment-324-1
γνώμην δικαίαν σχοῦσα
714
mvp-comment-325-1
ἐρεῖς μὲν οὐχὶ
715
ἐρεῖς
716
ἐρεῖς … μ’ ὡς
717
mvp-comment-325-2
ἄρξασά τι λυπηρὸν
718
mvp-comment-325-3
τάδ’ ἐξήκους’
719
mvp-comment-326-1
τοῦ τεθνηκότος θ’ ὕπερ
720
mvp-comment-327-1
καὶ μὴν
721
mvp-comment-327-2
λόγους ἐξῆρχές με
722