mvp-comment-221-1
τῆσδε … αὕτη
1
πάλιν
2
mvp-comment-222-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
3
mvp-comment-222-2
πως
4
mvp-comment-222-3
μύθων
5
mvp-comment-223-1
οὐδ’
6
κοὐδ’
7
ποτέ
8
mvp-comment-224-1
ἰὸν
9
mvp-comment-224-2
σχήσει
10
mvp-comment-225-1
τὸ δεινὸν
11
mvp-comment-225-2
εἰ γὰρ τῶνδέ μοι
12
εἰ
13
mvp-comment-226-1
γὰρ
14
mvp-comment-226-2
γόων
15
λόγων
16
mvp-comment-227-1
ἐνταῦθα
17
mvp-comment-227-2
ἔνθα μή ποτε … προσόψει
18
mvp-comment-227-3
ζῶσα
19
mvp-comment-227-4
κατηρεφεῖ
20
mvp-comment-227-5
χθονὸς τῆσδ’ ἐκτὸς
21
mvp-comment-227-6
ὑμνήσεις
22
mvp-comment-228-1
πρὸς ταῦτα
23
mvp-comment-228-2
Nauck reads
κοὔ
24
καί
25
mvp-comment-228-3
ἐν καλῷ, εὔκαιρον
schol.:
H. 4. 3. 5
νομίσαντες οὐκ ἐν καλῷ εἶναι πρὸς τοὺς ὁπλίτας ἱππομαχεῖν
: so, too,
Eur.
Heracl. 971
, etc. Cp.
καλόν
(
ἐστι
)=
καίριον
in
Soph.
Ph. 1155
; and
εἰς καλόν
=
καιρίως
in
O.T. 78.
mvp-comment-229-1
ἦ ταῦτα δὴ
26
ἦ … δὴ
27
ἦ … γὰρ
28
mvp-comment-229-2
καὶ βεβούλευνται
29
mvp-comment-230-1
ἀλλ’ ἐξίκοιτο
30
mvp-comment-230-2
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκ’
31
mvp-comment-231-1
τίνα … τόνδ’
32
mvp-comment-231-2
τάλαινα
33
mvp-comment-232-1
εἴ τι τῶνδε
34
mvp-comment-233-1
ποῦ ποτ’ εἶ φρενῶν
35
mvp-comment-234-1
ὅπως
36
ὑμῶν
37
mvp-comment-234-2
προσώτατ’
38
προσωτάτω φύγω
39
mvp-comment-235-1
βίου … τοῦ παρόντος
40
mvp-comment-236-1
καλὸς γὰρ
41
mvp-comment-236-2
θαυμάσαι
42
mvp-comment-237-1
τοῖς φίλοις
43
mvp-comment-238-1
εἰκαθεῖν
44
mvp-comment-239-1
ταῦτα
45
οὐκ ἐμοὺς
46
mvp-comment-240-1
γε
47
μέντοι
48
mvp-comment-240-2
μὴ )ξ
49
mvp-comment-240-3
πεσεῖν
50
mvp-comment-240-4
399 A woman, speaking of herself in the plur., uses the masc.:
Ant. 926
παθόντες ἂν ξυγγνοῖμεν ἡμαρτηκότες
.
mvp-comment-241-1
συγγνώμην
51
mvp-comment-242-1
τἄπη
52
mvp-comment-242-2
πρὸς κακῶν
53
mvp-comment-243-1
μή πω
54
mvp-comment-244-1
οἷπερ … ὁδοῦ
55
mvp-comment-245-1
τῷ φέρεις
56
mvp-comment-245-2
ἔμπυρα
57
mvp-comment-246-1
τυμβεῦσαι χοάς
58
mvp-comment-247-1
βροτῶν
59
mvp-comment-248-1
ὃν ἔκταν’ αὐτή
60
ὅν γ’
61
mvp-comment-249-1
τῷ τοῦτ’ ἤρεσεν
62
mvp-comment-250-1
δείματος
63
mvp-comment-250-2
δοκεῖν ἐμοί
64
mvp-comment-251-1
θεοὶ πατρῷοι
65
mvp-comment-251-2
συγγένεσθέ γ’
66
mvp-comment-251-3
ἀλλὰ νῦν
67
mvp-comment-252-1
εἴποιμ’ ἂν τότε
68
mvp-comment-253-1
ἐπὶ σμικρὸν
69
ἐπὶ σμικρῶν
70
mvp-comment-253-2
φράσαι
71
mvp-comment-254-1
σμικροὶ λόγοι
72
mvp-comment-255-1
πατρὸς … δευτέραν ὁμιλίαν
73
mvp-comment-255-2
ἐφέστιον πῆξαι
74
mvp-comment-255-3
This sceptre is described in the
Iliad (2. 101 f.) as the work of Hephaestus, who gave it Zeus; Hermes transmitted it to Pelops, from whom it passed to Atreus and Agamemnon. The Homeric sceptre is often called
χρύσεον
(
Il. 2. 268
, etc.), prob. as being ornamented with gold foil, or studded with gold nails (
Il. 1. 246
χρυσείοις ἥλοισι πεπαρμένον
). Among the objects found at Mycenae are some supposed remains of such sceptres (Schliem.,
Myc. 201, etc.).
mvp-comment-255-4
οὑφόρει ποτέ
75
mvp-comment-256-1
ἔκ τε
76
ἐκ δὲ
77
mvp-comment-256-2
βρύοντα
78
mvp-comment-256-3
ᾧ … γενέσθαι
79
mvp-comment-256-4
The vision resembles that of Astyages, who dreamed that a vine sprang from his daughter Mandanè, the wife of Cambyses,
τὴν δὲ ἄμπελον ἐπισχεῖν τὴν Ἀσίην πᾶσαν
. The
ὀνειροπόλοι
explained this to mean that her son (Cyrus) should reign in his grandfather's stead. (
Her. 1. 108.
) The spreading branches figure also in the dream of Xerxes (7. 19):
ἐδόκεε...ἐστεφανῶσθαι ἐλαίης θαλλῷ, ἀπὸ δὲ τῆς ἐλαίης τοὺς κλάδους γῆν πᾶσαν ἐπισχεῖν
.
mvp-comment-256-5
In choosing the
sceptre of Agamemnon as the stock from which the wondrous growth is put forth, Sophocles may have had in mind the words of Achilles (
Il. 1. 234
ff.);
ναὶ μὰ τόδε σκῆπτρον· τὸ μὲν οὔποτε φύλλα καὶ ὄζους
|
φύσει, ἐπεὶ δὴ πρῶτα τομὴν ἐν ὄρεσσι λέλοιπεν
, |
οὐδ’ ἀναθηλήσει
.
mvp-comment-257-1
του παρόντος
80
τοῦ
81
παρόντος
82
του
83
mvp-comment-257-2
Ἡλίῳ δείκνυσι τοὖναρ
84
mvp-comment-258-1
οὐ κάτοιδα, πλὴν
85
mvp-comment-258-2
πέμπει με κείνη
86
mvp-comment-259-1
These three verses, which the MSS. give to Electra, and which several recent critics reject (cr. n.), clearly belong to Chrysothemis, and are genuine. Electra's exclamation of joy (411) caused Chrysothemis to ask if her sister had any ground for hope (412). Electra replied that, when she had heard the dream, she would say. This showed her sister that Electra relied merely on the fact that Clytaemnestra had seen
some fearful vision. Now, therefore, instead of asking for Electra's interpretation, she merely repeats her counsel (383 f.) before proceeding on her errand. The words
πρός
νυν θεῶν κ.τ.λ.
(428 ff.) show the train of her thought. To Chrysothemis, the alarm of Clytaemnestra (427) is more important than the apparition of Agamemnon. The dream is only a new reason why Electra should be cautious,—not why she should hope.
mvp-comment-259-2
The current ascription of the verses to Electra was doubtless prompted by verse 413. It was supposed that the recital of Chrysothemis must be immediately followed by the comments of Electra. But, as Hermann observed, the phrase
ἀβουλίᾳ πεσεῖν
would alone suffice to show that the verses belong to Chrysothemis (
cp. 398
). Nor could the warning,
σὺν κακῷ μέτει πάλιν
, be fitly uttered by Electra.
mvp-comment-259-3
τῶν ἐγγενῶν
87
mvp-comment-260-1
ἀβουλίᾳ
88
mvp-comment-260-2
σὺν κακῷ
89
mvp-comment-260-3
μέτει
90
mvp-comment-261-1
ἀλλ’
91
mvp-comment-261-2
ὦ φίλη
92
τούτων μὲν
93
mvp-comment-262-1
οὐ … θέμις
94
οὐδ’ ὅσιον
95
mvp-comment-262-2
ἐχθρᾶς ἀπὸ γυναικὸς
96
mvp-comment-262-3
κτερίσματ’
97
mvp-comment-262-4
λουτρὰ
98
mvp-comment-263-1
ἀλλ’ ἢ πνοαῖσιν
99
ῥοαῖσιν
100
mvp-comment-263-2
κρύψον
101
mvp-comment-263-3
νιν
102
mvp-comment-263-4
ἔνθα μή ποτ’
103
ἔνθεν
104
mvp-comment-263-5
εὐνὴν
105
mvp-comment-264-1
ἀλλ’ ὅταν θάῃν
106
mvp-comment-264-2
The conjecture
ἔστ’ ἂν
107
ὅταν
108
σῳζέσθω
109
mvp-comment-264-3
κειμήλἰ
110
mvp-comment-265-1
ἀρχὴν
111
τλημονεστάτη
112
mvp-comment-266-1
ἔβλαστε
113
mvp-comment-267-1
ὅν γ’ … τῷδ’
114
mvp-comment-267-2
ἐπέστεφε
115
mvp-comment-267-3
442 f. The position of
αὐτῇ
116
mvp-comment-267-4
δέξεσθαι
117
mvp-comment-267-5
It seems, then, a reasonable inference that here, where the reference is to future time, he would have written
δέξεσθαι
118
δέξασθαι
119
mvp-comment-267-6
444 ff. Join
θανὼν ἄτιμος
120
mvp-comment-267-7
ἐμασχαλίσθη
121
mvp-comment-267-8
Two different motives are assigned by the Greek commentators; viz.:—(1) the desire to render the dead incapable of wreaking vengeance (
ὥσπερ τὴν δύναμιν ἐκείνων ἀφαιρούμενοι
): (2) the desire to make an atonement (
ἐξιλάσασθαι τὴν δολοφονίαν—ἀφοσιοῦσθαι τὸν φόνον
). There can be little doubt that the first of these motives was the primitive origin of the custom. If the second was afterwards blended with it, the idea may have been that of offering the severed portions to the gods below,—as a victim was devoted to death by cutting off a lock of hair (
Eur.
Alc. 75
). Apollonius Rhodius seems to present the practice in this light (4. 477): Jason, having slain a foe,
ἐξάργματα τάμνε θανόντος
. Cp.
Etym. Magn.:
ἀπάργματα λέγεται τὰ ὑπὸ τῶν τραγῳδῶν λεγόμενα μασχαλίσματα
.
mvp-comment-267-9
κἀπὶ λουτροῖσιν
122
mvp-comment-267-10
ἐξέμαξ ν
123
mvp-comment-267-11
ἆρα μὴ
124
mvp-comment-268-1
οὐκ ἔστιν
125
mvp-comment-268-2
ταῦτα μὲν μέθες· σὺ δὲ
126
mvp-comment-269-1
βοστρύχων ἄκρας φόβας
127
mvp-comment-269-2
κἀμοῦ ταλαίνης
128
mvp-comment-270-1
†ἀλιπαρῆ
129
λιπαρῆ
130
mvp-comment-270-2
We come, therefore, to a dilemma. (1) The words
τήνδ’ ἀλιπαρῆ τρίχα
may conceal some corruption:
τήνδ’
ought possibly to be
τήνδε τ’
131
ἀλίπαρον
132
mvp-comment-270-3
(2) Or else, if the text be sound,
ἀλιπαρῆ
may mean
οὐ λιπαράν
. There is no doubt that
λιπ
, ‘fat,’ is the root both of
λι^παρός
, ‘shining,’ and of
λι—παρής
, ‘sticking’; cp.
Plat.
Crat. 427 B
τὸ λιπαρὸν καὶ τὸ κολλῶδες
(
Curt.
Etym. § 340
). Similarly
γλίσχρος
, ‘sticky,’ came to mean ‘importunate.’ It is barely possible that, in coining a new negative compound, the poet may have transferred the sense of
λιπαρός
to
λιπαρής
: but it seems improbable.
mvp-comment-271-1
ζῶμα
133
mvp-comment-271-2
χλιδαῖς
134
mvp-comment-272-1
προσπίτνουσα
135
αὐτὸν
136
mvp-comment-273-1
ἐξ ὑπερτέρας χερός
137
mvp-comment-273-2
ζῶντ’
138
mvp-comment-274-1
ἀφνεωτέραις
139
mvp-comment-274-2
στέφωμεν
140
mvp-comment-274-3
δωρούμεθα
141
mvp-comment-275-1
οἶμαι μὲν οὖν
142
mvp-comment-275-2
If
μέλον
143
μέλειν
144
μέλον
145
mvp-comment-276-1
σοί
146
mvp-comment-277-1
βροτῶν
147
mvp-comment-278-1
πρὸς εὐσέβειαν
148
mvp-comment-279-1
δράσω
149
mvp-comment-279-2
τὸ γὰρ δίκαιον
150
mvp-comment-279-3
(1)
τὸ δίκαιον
is an acc. of general reference, and
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
is impersonal. ‘With regard to what is (clearly) right, it is unreasonable for two persons to dispute; rather both should hasten on the doing (of it).’ With
ἀλλ’ ἐπισπεύδειν
we supply the notion
δεῖ
from the negative
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
(as from
οὐκ ἔξεστι
in
O. C. 1402
ff.; cp.
O. T. 817
ff.). For the form of the sentence, cp.
H. 7. 3. 7
τοὺς περὶ Ἀρχίαν...οὐ ψῆφον ἀνεμείνατε, ἀλλὰ ὁπότε πρῶτον ἐδυνάσθητε ἐτιμωρήσασθε
. So here the acc.
τὸ δίκαιον
, which represents the object of
δρᾶν
, is separated from it by the parenthesis
οὐκ
ἔχει λόγον δυοῖν ἐρίζειν
. (The first scholium gives substantially this view:
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον φιλονεικεῖν περὶ τοῦ δικαίου, ὥστε περὶ αὐτοῦ δύο ὄντας ἐρίζειν
.)
mvp-comment-279-4
(2) Or
τὸ δίκαιον
might be nom.: ‘that which is clearly right does not
afford any ground (
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
) for two persons to dispute,’ etc. So the second schol.:
ἢ τὸ οὐκ ἔχει λόγον ἀντὶ τοῦ οὐ παρέχει πρόφασιν
. So far as the verb
ἔχει
is concerned, this sense is quite admissible: cp.
Thuc. 2. 41
οὔτε τῷ πολεμίῳ ἐπελθόντι ἀγανάκτησιν ἔχει
(
ἡ πόλις
). The objection is that the phrases
ἔχειν λόγον, οὐκ ἔχειν λόγον
, which are very common, regularly mean, ‘to be reasonable,’ ‘to be unreasonable.’ This is so both in the personal and in the impersonal constr.; as Plat.
Phaedop. 62 D
τὸ γὰρ μὴ ἀγανακτεῖν...οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
:
Dem. or. 36 § 54
πῶς ἔχει λόγον σὲ...δίκην ἀξιοῦν λαμβάνειν
; The supposed sense, ‘not to
afford a reason,’ is unexampled.
mvp-comment-279-5
δυοῖν
151
mvp-comment-280-1
παρ’ ὑμῶν
152
mvp-comment-281-1
πικρὰν
153
δοκῶ με … τολμήσειν
154
ἔτι
155
mvp-comment-282-1
εἰ μὴ )γὼ
156
mvp-comment-282-2
γνώμας λειπομένα
157
mvp-comment-283-1
ἁ πρόμαντις Δίκα
158
mvp-comment-283-2
δίκαια φερομένα χεροῖν κράτη
159
mvp-comment-284-1
μέτεισιν
160
mvp-comment-284-2
οὐ μακροῦ χρόνου
161
mvp-comment-285-1
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
162
κλύουσαν
163
mvp-comment-285-2
ἁδυπνόων … ὀνειράτων
164
mvp-comment-286-1
ἀμναστεῖ γ’ ὁ φύσας ς’
165
mvp-comment-287-1
χαλκόπλακτος
166
mvp-comment-287-2
γένυς
167
mvp-comment-287-3
The very axe (
φόνιος πέλεκυς
, 99) with which the blow was dealt is imagined as nourishing a grudge against the murderers who had set it such a task. Such a personification recalls that practice of Athenian law by which inanimate objects which had caused death were brought to a formal trial in the court called
τὸ ἐπὶ Πρυτανείῳ
, and, after sentence, cast beyond the boundaries, in the presence of the Archon Basileus and the sacrificial officers of the tribes (
φυλο‐
βασιλεῖς
). Aeschin. or. 3 § 244
τὰ μὲν ξύλα καὶ τοὺς λίθους καὶ τὸν σίδηρον, τὰ ἄφωνα καὶ ἀγνώμονα, ἐάν τῳ ἐμπεσόντα ἀποκτείνῃ, ὑπερορίζομεν
. (Cp.
Dem. or. 23 § 76
.) A like conception was implied in the English law (repealed in 1846) of ‘deodands’ (Deo danda),
i.e., personal chattels (whether animals or things) which, having caused the death of a human being, were forfeited to the Crown for pious uses.
mvp-comment-288-1
ἐν αἰκίαις
168
mvp-comment-289-1
καὶ πολύπους καὶ πολύχειρ
169
mvp-comment-290-1
λόχοις
170
mvp-comment-290-2
χαλκόπους
171
mvp-comment-291-1
ἄλεκτρ’ ἄνυμφα
172
mvp-comment-291-2
γάμων ἁμιλλήμαθ’
173
mvp-comment-291-3
ἐπέβα
174
mvp-comment-292-1
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι … συνδρῶσιν
175
mvp-comment-292-2
Verses 495—497 (
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι...τέρας
) answer metrically to vv. 479—481
ὕπεστί μοι...ὀνειράτων
, where the text is certain, save for the doubt whether
θράσος
or
θάρσος
should stand in 479. Here we must first decide two points.
mvp-comment-292-3
(1) Are the words
πρὸ τῶνδε
176
mvp-comment-292-4
(2) Could
ἔχει με, μήποτε τέρας πελᾶν
(etc.) mean, ‘
the belief possesses me, that’ etc.? Surely not. No real parallel for so strange a phrase has been produced. It is irrelevant to quote those impersonal verbs which directly express the
occurrence of a thought to the mind; as
Xen.
An. 6. 1. 17
εἰσῄει αὐτοὺς ὅπως ἂν καὶ ἔχοντές τι οἴκαδε ἀφίκοιντο
(‘the thought came to them, how they might,’ etc.):
Thuc. 6. 78.
§ 1
εἰ δέ τῳ ἄρα παρέστηκε, τὸν μὲν Συρακόσιον...πολέμιον εἶναι κ.τ.λ.
Either, then, the subject to
ἔχει
has dropped out, or the words
μ’ ἔχει
conceal a corruption.
mvp-comment-292-5
The following remedies are possible: I incline to the first, as involving least change. (1) Reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
, we may read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοί μ’ ἔχει
|
<θάρσος τι>, μήποθ’ ἡμῖν
etc. (It may be remarked that
τι
is in harmony with the tone of
ὕπεστί μοι
in 479.) Another available word is
ξύννοια
(cp.
Ant. 279
). (2) Or, reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θάρσος
, we could read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι θάρσος ἴσχει με
. On either view, the
υ
of
ἁδυπνόων
in 480 is long (as several critics have assumed). It should be noted that (1) involves a different constitution of the verses: see p. lxxxii.
mvp-comment-292-6
In those MSS. which have
μή ποτε μή ποθ’ ἡμῖν
177
mvp-comment-293-1
ἀψεγές
178
ἀψεφές
179
mvp-comment-293-2
πελᾶν
180
mvp-comment-294-1
τοῖς δρῶσι
181
τοῖς συνδρῶσιν
182
mvp-comment-295-1
μαντεῖαι βροτῶν
183
mvp-comment-296-1
εὖ κατασχήσει
184
mvp-comment-297-1
ἱππεία
185
mvp-comment-297-2
Oenomaüs, king of Pisa in Elis, had promised the hand of his daughter Hippodameia to the suitor who should defeat him in a chariot-race; the penalty of failure being death. The young Pelops, son of Tantalus, offered himself as a competitor. Myrtilus, the charioteer of Oenomaüs, was persuaded (either by Hippodameia or by Pelops) to betray his master. He did so by leaving out one or both of the linch-pins by which the naves of the chariot-wheels were secured to the axles.
Tzetzes on Lycophron 156
ταῖς χοινίκισι
(=
πλήμναις
, the naves)
τῶν τροχῶν οὐκ ἐμβαλὼν τοὺς ἥλους
. According to another story, he substituted a linch-pin of wax for a real one (
schol. Apoll. Rh. 752
ἐμβαλόντα κήρινον ἔμβολον ἐπὶ τοῦ ἀκραξονίου
). So Pelops won the race, and the bride. But Oenomaüs was soon avenged on the traitor; for Myrtilus insulted Hippodameia, and was thrown into the sea by Pelops; upon whose house he invoked a curse, as he sank.
mvp-comment-297-3
Euripides, too, (
Or. 990
ff.,
Helen. 386 f.) refers to this chariot-race as the event with which the troubles of the Pelopidae began. Apollonius Rhodius briefly describes the critical moment of the race as one of the subjects embroidered on the cloak of Jason (1. 752 ff.); there Oenomaüs was seen, ‘falling sideways, as the axle broke at the naves of the wheels,’—
ἄξονος ἐν πλήμνῃσι παρακλιδὸν ἀγνυμένοιο
|
πίπτεν
.
mvp-comment-297-4
The eastern pediment of the temple of Zeus at Olympia (
circ. 450 B.C.) was adorned with sculptures by Paeonius, representing the preparation for this contest (
Paus. 5. 10. 6
). The fragments found on the site have sufficed for a reconstruction of the group. Zeus occupied the centre; to the right of him were Pelops and Hippodameia; to the left, Oenomaüs and his wife Steropè. On each side was a chariot drawn by four horses. Myrtilus was sitting in front of his team, with his face turned away from his master.
mvp-comment-297-5
In the older and nobler form of the myth, Pelops won, not by a fraud, but by the grace of Poseidon, who gave him winged horses (Pindar
O. 1. 87
ἔδωκεν δίφρον τε χούσεον πτεροῖσίν τ’ ἀκάμαντας ἵππους
). On the chest (
λάρναξ
) of Cypselus, seen by Pausanias in the Heraeum at Olympia (
Paus. 5. 17. 5
), Pelops was driving two winged horses.
mvp-comment-298-1
αἰανὴς
186
mvp-comment-298-2
The form
αἰανὴς
has the best authority, and some critics hold that
αἰανὸς
(Hesych.) was a Byzantine invention. But in
Aesch.
Eum. 416
,
ἡμεῖς γάρ ἐσμεν νυκτὸς αἰανῆς τέκνα
(so L, schol., and Tzetzes on Lycophron 406),
αἰανῆ
is far less suitable.
mvp-comment-299-1
εὖτε
187
mvp-comment-299-2
ὁ ποντισθεὶς Μυρτίλος
188
mvp-comment-299-3
A vase found at Capua shows Pelops and Hippodameia in a ship, from which Myrtilus is falling backwards into the water. A winged Erinys hovers in the air above, brandishing a sword over the head of Pelops (Baumeister,
Denkmäler p. 1204, referring to
Mon. Inst. x. 25).
mvp-comment-299-4
ἐκοιμάθη
189
mvp-comment-300-1
παγχρυσέων δίφρων
190
mvp-comment-301-1
πρόρριζος
191
mvp-comment-301-2
ἐκριφθείς
192
mvp-comment-302-1
ἔλειπεν
193
ἔλιπεν
194
οἴκου
195
οἴκους
196
πω
197
mvp-comment-303-1
πολύπονος
198
αἰκία
199
mvp-comment-304-1
ἀνειμένη
200
μέν
201
mvp-comment-304-2
ὡς ἔοικας
202
mvp-comment-304-3
στρέφει
203
mvp-comment-304-4
Clytaemnestra begins in the same strain as Chrysothemis, who likewise emphasised her reproof by the word
αὖ
204
mvp-comment-305-1
μή τοι θυραίαν γ’
205
mvp-comment-305-2
αἰσχύνειν φίλους
206
mvp-comment-306-1
καίτοι
207
mvp-comment-306-2
δὴ
208
πολλούς
209
mvp-comment-306-3
ἐξεῖπάς με … ὡς
210
mvp-comment-306-4
θρασεῖα
211
τραχεῖα
212
mvp-comment-306-5
ἄρχω
213
mvp-comment-307-1
ὕβριν … οὐκ ἔχω
214
κακῶς κλύουσα
215
mvp-comment-308-1
πατὴρ γάρ
216
mvp-comment-308-2
πρόσχημα
217
mvp-comment-309-1
ἡ γὰρ Δίκη
218