mvp-comment-46-1
μηδὲν πρόσθεν
1
mvp-comment-46-2
τὰ Λοξίου
2
mvp-comment-46-3
ἀρχηγετεῖν
3
mvp-comment-47-1
πατρὸς
4
mvp-comment-47-2
λουτρά
5
mvp-comment-47-3
φέρει … ἐφ’ ἡμῖν
6
mvp-comment-47-4
νίκην
7
κράτος τῶν δρωμένων
8
mvp-comment-47-5
All three actors now leave the scene. Orestes and Pylades go to Agamemnon's grave,—departing, probably, by the entrance on the spectators' right. The Paedagogus leaves by the entrance on the left,—to await the moment for seeking admission to the house (v. 660).—It might, indeed, be inferred from
πειρώμεθ’
(83) that the old man goes with the youths to their task; but the word need not imply more than his participation in the plan. while verses 73—75 seem clearly to indicate that he separates from his companions. When they have gone, Electra enters from the house.
mvp-comment-48-1
A
θρῆνος ἀπὸ σκηνῆς
, or lyric lament delivered by an actor alone. as dist. from the joint
κομμός
of actor and Chorus (121 n.).
mvp-comment-48-2
Verses 86—102 form a
σύστημα
,=vv. 103—120 (
ἀντισύστημα
). If the text is sound, the correspondence is not exact, since the dimeter in v. 99 answers to a monometer in v. 116. These anapaests are, however, of the type usually known as ‘free’ or ‘melic,’ as having more of a lyric character than the regular anapaests of the marching-songs (like those of the Parodos in the
Ajax): see W. Christ,
Metrik, 2nd ed., § 288. And in such anapaests the symmetry of ‘systems’ is often not strict (cp.
O. C. 117
n.).
mvp-comment-48-3
ὦ φάος ἁγνὸν
9
mvp-comment-48-4
γῆς ἰσόμοιρ’ ἀήρ
10
mvp-comment-48-5
ἰσόμοιῤ
11
ἰσόμοιρος
12
mvp-comment-49-1
πολλὰς μὲν … ᾔσθου
13
mvp-comment-49-2
ἀντήρεις
14
mvp-comment-50-1
πληγὰς
15
πλαγὰς
16
mvp-comment-51-1
ὑπολειφθῇ
17
ᾔσθου
18
mvp-comment-52-1
τὰ … παννυχίδων
19
ξυνίσας’
20
ὅσα … θρηνῶ
21
mvp-comment-52-2
ἤδη
22
mvp-comment-52-3
The MS.
οἴκων
23
λέκτρων
24
μογερῶν
25
mvp-comment-53-1
ὅσα τὸν δύστηνον
26
mvp-comment-54-1
κατὰ μὲν βάρβαρον αἶαν
27
ἐξένισεν
28
mvp-comment-55-1
Ἄρης
29
mvp-comment-55-2
ἐξένισεν
30
mvp-comment-56-1
κοινολεχὴς
31
mvp-comment-57-1
ὅπως δρῦν ὑλοτόμοι
32
mvp-comment-57-2
σχίζουσι
33
mvp-comment-57-3
κάρα
34
mvp-comment-57-4
πέλεκει
35
mvp-comment-58-1
ἄλλης
36
mvp-comment-58-2
φέρεται
37
mvp-comment-58-3
The deletion of the words
ἀπ’ ἄλλης
38
ἢ )μοῦ
39
mvp-comment-59-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ μὲν δὴ
40
mvp-comment-60-1
ἄστρων
41
mvp-comment-60-2
Others read,
ἔστ’ ἂν λεύσσω παμφεγγεῖς
|
ῥιπάς, λεύσσω δὲ τόδ’ ἦμαρ
, omitting
ἄστρων
. But
παμφεγγεῖς ῥιπάς
, without
ἄστρων
, would not suffice to denote starlight. If, again, the phrase is taken to denote the
sun's rays (as Monk proposes,
Mus. Crit. I. p. 67), then
λεύσσω δὲ τόδ’ ἦμαρ
becomes weak. Further, the preceding context, in which she has spoken of her laments
at night (92) and at morning, clearly suggests that the sense here is, ‘so long as I look on the
stars or on the
sun.’
mvp-comment-61-1
μὴ οὐ
42
mvp-comment-61-2
τεκνολέτειῤ
43
mvp-comment-62-1
ἐπὶ κωκυτῷ
44
mvp-comment-62-2
ἠχὼ
45
mvp-comment-63-1
Electra invokes, (1) the house of Hades and his bride Persephone, in which the spirit of Agamemnon now dwells; (2) Hermes, who, as
ψυχοπομπός
, conducted him thither,—and who will also guide the avengers on their way (1395 f.); (3)
Ἀρά
, the imprecation uttered by the victim upon his murderers,—the personified curse, here conceived as a supernatural power (
πότνια
), which calls the Erinyes into action; and (4) the Erinyes themselves.
mvp-comment-63-2
Ἀΐδου
46
mvp-comment-64-1
ὦ χθόνἰ Ἑρμῆ
47
mvp-comment-64-2
Ἀρά
48
mvp-comment-64-3
πότνια
49
mvp-comment-65-1
σεμναὶ
50
mvp-comment-65-2
θεῶν παῖδες
51
mvp-comment-66-1
ὁρᾶθ’
52
mvp-comment-67-1
αἳ τοὺς εὐνὰς ὑποκλεπτομένους
53
mvp-comment-67-2
These much-impugned words appear genuine. The murder has been prompted by the guilty love:
δόλος ἦν ὁ φράσας, ἔρος ὁ κτείνας
(197). In Electra's thought, they are inseparable. The allusion to the love
follows the reference to the murder, because she regards it as the crowning outrage (271
τὴν τελευταίαν ὕβριν
) that Clytaemnestra still lives with Aegisthus. Bloodshed was not the only sin which the Erinyes punished. They were the embodied sanctions of natural law, and every crime against the family came within their cognisance. (See
Introd. to Homer, p. 51, § 13.) Indeed, Electra herself speaks of the unhallowed union as a special provocation to those Avengers: 275 f.
ἡ δ’ ὧδε τλήμων ὥστε τῷ μιάστορι
|
ξύνεστ’, Ἐρινὺν οὔτιν’ ἐκφοβουμένη
.
mvp-comment-68-1
τείσασθε
54
mvp-comment-69-1
ἡμετέρου
55
μοι
56
mvp-comment-69-2
καί μοι
57
mvp-comment-70-1
ἄγειν
58
mvp-comment-70-2
σωκῶ
59
mvp-comment-71-1
δυστανοτάτας
60
mvp-comment-72-1
τάκεις … οἰμωγὰν
61
mvp-comment-72-2
ἀκόρεστον
62
mvp-comment-72-3
τὸν πάλαι
63
mvp-comment-72-4
πάλαι
64
ἐκ
65
mvp-comment-72-5
ἀθεώτατα
66
mvp-comment-72-6
κακᾷ … χειρὶ πρόδοτον
67
χειρὶ
68
mvp-comment-72-7
ὡς
69
mvp-comment-72-8
ὁ τάδε πορὼν
70
mvp-comment-72-9
εἴ μοι θέμις
71
mvp-comment-73-1
γενέθλα
72
mvp-comment-73-2
γενναίων
73
mvp-comment-73-3
παραμύθ‐
74
ιον
75
mvp-comment-74-1
ξυνίημι
76
mvp-comment-74-2
τάδ’
77
mvp-comment-75-1
φυγγάνει
78
mvp-comment-75-2
οὐδ’ ἐθέλω
79
mvp-comment-76-1
μὴ οὐ
80
mvp-comment-76-2
τὸν ἐμὸν … πατέρ’ ἄθλιον
81
mvp-comment-77-1
παντοίας
82
mvp-comment-77-2
Electra's lyrics contain some Doricisms (129, 146 f., etc.): but it is best to retain
φιλότητος
, with the MSS. The form in
η
was so familiar through Homer that it may have been preferred to
φιλότατος
even in lyrics.
Cp. 236
.
mvp-comment-78-1
ἀλύειν
83
mvp-comment-79-1
αἰαῖ, ἱκνοῦμαι
84
mvp-comment-80-1
τόν γ’ ἐξ Ἀΐδα … λίμνας
85
mvp-comment-80-2
παγκοίνου
86
mvp-comment-80-3
ἀνστάσεις
87
mvp-comment-81-1
οὔτε †γόοις οὔτε λιταῖσιν
88
οὔτε γόοισιν οὔτ’ εὐχαῖς
89
mvp-comment-82-1
For the repetition of
ἀλλά
90
mvp-comment-82-2
ἀπὸ τῶν μετρίων
91
mvp-comment-82-3
ἀμήχανον
92
mvp-comment-82-4
ο=ιόλλυσαι
93
mvp-comment-83-1
ἐν οἷς
94
mvp-comment-83-2
ἀνάλυσις … κακῶν
95
mvp-comment-83-3
τί μοι
96
mvp-comment-84-1
νήπιος
97
mvp-comment-84-2
γονέων
98
mvp-comment-85-1
ἐμέ γ’ … ἄραρεν
99
mvp-comment-85-2
φρένας
100
mvp-comment-86-1
αἰὲν Ἴτυν
101
mvp-comment-87-1
ὄρνις
102
mvp-comment-87-2
ἀτυζομένα
103
mvp-comment-87-3
Διὸς ἄγγελος
104
mvp-comment-88-1
Νιόβα, σὲ δ’
105
θεόν
106
mvp-comment-88-2
ἅτ’
107
mvp-comment-88-3
ἐν τάφῳ πετραίῳ
108
mvp-comment-89-1
αἰεὶ
109
mvp-comment-90-1
οὔτοι σοὶ μούνᾳ
110
mvp-comment-91-1
πρὸς ὅ τι
111
mvp-comment-91-2
τῶν ἔνδον εἶ περισσά
112
mvp-comment-92-1
οἷς
113
τῶν ἔνδον
114
mvp-comment-92-2
ὁμόθεν
115
γονᾷ ξύναιμος
116
mvp-comment-93-1
οἵα Χρ. ζώει
117
mvp-comment-93-2
Acc. to the version followed by Sophocles, Agamemnon had four daughters, Iphigeneia, Electra, Chrysothemis, Iphianassa. This was the account given in the cyclic
Κύπρια ἔπη
, as the schol. here mentions; a poem of which there is another trace in this play (566 ff.). Sophocles wrote an
Ἰφιγένεια
(
Nauck,
frag. Soph. 284—292
); but her name is not mentioned in the reference to her death below (530—594). In
Il. 9. 145
Agamemnon has three daughters, Chrysothemis, Laodicè, Iphianassa: Homer does not mention Iphigeneia. Lucretius gives the name of Iphianassa to the victim at Aulis (
1. 85
).
mvp-comment-93-3
ζώει
118
mvp-comment-93-4
καὶ Ἰφιάνασσα
119
mvp-comment-94-1
ἀχέων
120
mvp-comment-94-2
Hermann, taking
ἀχέων
121
κρυπτᾷ
122
mvp-comment-95-1
ὄλβιος, ὃν
123
mvp-comment-95-2
For the simple
ὅς
, instead of
ὅς γε
or
ὅστις
, with causal force, cp. below, 188, 261, 959;
O.T. 817.
mvp-comment-96-1
δέξεται εὐπατρίδαν
124
mvp-comment-96-2
Διὸς εὔφρονι
125
βήματι
126
mvp-comment-96-3
γᾶν
127
γᾶ
128
mvp-comment-96-4
Ὀρέσταν
129
ὃν
130
mvp-comment-97-1
ἀκάματα
131
mvp-comment-97-2
ἀνύμφευτος
132
ἄτεκνος
133
mvp-comment-97-3
οἰχνῶ
134
mvp-comment-98-1
δάκρυσι μυδαλέα
135
mvp-comment-98-2
τὸν ἀνήνυτον
136
mvp-comment-98-3
οἶτον ἔχουσα
137
mvp-comment-99-1
ὧν τ’ ἔπαθ’
138
ὧν τ’ ἐδάη
139
mvp-comment-99-2
Wecklein, reading
ἐδάην
, explains,— ‘what I have heard from him,’—viz., his promises of coming.
mvp-comment-99-3
τί γὰρ … ἀγγελίας
140
mvp-comment-99-4
ἀπατώμενον
141
τί … οὐκ
142
mvp-comment-99-5
Herwerden's
οὐχί μοι
143
οὐκ ἐμοί
144
ὁ δέ
145
mvp-comment-100-1
ποθεῖ, ποθῶν δ’
146
mvp-comment-101-1
ἔτι μέγας οὐρανῷ
147
ἐν
148
mvp-comment-102-1
τὸν ὑπεραλγῆ
149
mvp-comment-102-2
νέμουσα
150
mvp-comment-103-1
μήτε ὑπεράχθεο
151
οἷς
152
mvp-comment-104-1
εὐμαρὴς θεός
153
θεός
154
mvp-comment-105-1
οὔτε γὰρ
155
mvp-comment-105-2
Κρῖσαν
156
mvp-comment-105-3
Crisa stood about two miles W.S.W. of Delphi, on a spur of Parnassus, at the lower outlet of the gorge through which the river Pleistus issues into the plain. The
Iliad mentions ‘sacred Crisa’ (
ζαθέην
, 2. 520). But the Homeric Hymn to the Pythian Apollo is the best witness to its ancient power. There, just as here, the name
Κρῖσα
includes the land which stretches southward from the town to its harbour on the ‘wide gulf’ (vv. 253— 261). We need not, then, read
Κρίσᾳ
or
Κρίσας
. Crisa was the earliest seat of trade on the western sea; Delphi, when first founded, was merely a sanctuary in its territory. Pindar recalls the old prominence of its name when he describes a Pythian victory as won
Κρισαίαις ἐνὶ πτυχαῖς
(
P. 6. 18).
mvp-comment-105-4
Cirrha, a town of much later date, was the port of Crisa on the gulf. About 585 B.C., the Delphians, aided by Cleisthenes of Sicyon and his allies, succeeded, after a long struggle, in humbling Crisa and destroying Cirrha. The Crisaean plain was then devoted to Apollo, whose domain was thus extended from his temple to the coast. When Sophocles wrote, that ground was still a
βούνομος ἀκτή
, inviolable by plough or spade. It was not till the middle of the next century that the alleged encroachments of Amphissa on the
ἱερὰ χώρα
gave a pretext for war to the Amphictyons (355 B.C.).
mvp-comment-105-5
Ulrichs (
Reisen in Griechenland) was the first to place the relations of Crisa and Cirrha in a clear light. Strabo correctly describes the site of Cirrha, but erroneously places Crisa to the east of it (9. p. 418).
mvp-comment-106-1
βούνομον
157
βουνόμον
158
mvp-comment-106-2
βούνομον ἀκτὰν
159
Κρῖσαν
160
mvp-comment-107-1
ἀπερίτροπος
161
mvp-comment-108-1
παρὰ τὸν Ἀχέροντα
162
ἀνάσσων
163
θεὸς
164
mvp-comment-109-1
μὲν
165
mvp-comment-109-2
ὁ πολὺς … βίοτος
166
mvp-comment-109-3
ἀνέλπιστος
167
mvp-comment-109-4
187 *
τεκέων
. I am now satisfied that this is a true correction of
τοκέων
168
ἅτις
169
τοκέων
170
mvp-comment-110-1
ἁπερεί
171
mvp-comment-110-2
ἔποικος
172
mvp-comment-111-1
οἰκονομῶ θαλάμους
173
mvp-comment-112-1
ἀεικεῖ σὺν στολᾷ
174
mvp-comment-113-1
κεναῖς δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
175
ἀμφίσταμαι
176
mvp-comment-113-2
Hartung, reading
κενὰ δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
, takes the sense to be that she stands ‘hungry’ by the tables at which the others feast. But
κενή
as=
νῆστις
would be neither usual nor elegant.
mvp-comment-114-1
Hitherto the Chorus have offered consolation or counsel. At v. 213 they return to that strain. But here, moved by Electra's misery, they join with her in bewailing its cause.
mvp-comment-114-2
οἰκτρὰ μὲν … πλαγά
177
κοίταις
178
οἰκτρὰ … αὐδὰ
179
mvp-comment-114-3
Sophocles, who follows the Homeric story as to the banquet, could not but remember the
οἰκτροτάτην ὄπα
of the dying Cassandra. And this might naturally suggest to him that other
οἰκτρὰ αὐδή
which she had uttered at an earlier moment, immediately after Agamemnon's return,—her presage of his fate, and her own:
Aesch.
Ag. 1072
—1314.
mvp-comment-114-4
The sense then is:—‘There was a voice of lamentation at the return from Troy’; alluding especially to Cassandra's laments, but also, perhaps, to forebodings in the mouth of the people at Mycenae. ‘And there was a voice of lamentation
ἐν κοίταις πατρῴαις
, when thy father lay on the couch at the fatal banquet.’ The ‘voice’ at the banquet is, first, that of the dying Agamemnon; but Sophocles may have thought also of Cassandra's death-cry, which was sounding in the king's ears as he fell.—For other interpretations, see Appendix.
mvp-comment-114-5
νόστοις
180
ἐν
181
mvp-comment-114-6
κοίταις
182
mvp-comment-114-7
ὅτε οἱ
183
σοι
184
ἀνταία
185
mvp-comment-114-8
γενύων
186
mvp-comment-115-1
δόλος … ἔρος
187
mvp-comment-116-1
δεινὰν δεινῶς
188
δεινὰν … μορφάν
189
mvp-comment-116-2
εἴτ’ οὖν … εἴτε
190
βροτῶν
191
mvp-comment-117-1
πλέον … ἐχθίστα
192
mvp-comment-117-2
δὴ
193
mvp-comment-118-1
νὺξ
194
mvp-comment-118-2
δείπνων
195
mvp-comment-119-1
ἄχθη
196
τοῖς
197
θανάτους
198
mvp-comment-119-2
διδύμαιν χειροῖν
199
διδύμοιν
200
mvp-comment-120-1
εἷλον … πρόδοτον
201
mvp-comment-121-1
οἷς
202
mvp-comment-121-2
Ὀλύμπιος
203
mvp-comment-122-1
ποίνιμα
204
mvp-comment-123-1
ἀγλαΐας
205
mvp-comment-123-2
ἀποναίατο
206
mvp-comment-124-1
πόρσω
207
mvp-comment-125-1
γνώμαν ἴσχεις
208
mvp-comment-125-2
ἐξ οἵων
209
mvp-comment-125-3
τὰ παρόντ’
210
mvp-comment-125-4
οἰκείας
211
mvp-comment-126-1
πολύ … τι κακῶν
212
mvp-comment-126-2
ὑπερεκτήσω
213
mvp-comment-127-1
τὰ δὲ
214
οὐκ ἐριστὰ τοῖς δυνατοῖς
215
πλάθειν
216
mvp-comment-127-2
ἐριστά
217
mvp-comment-127-3
πλάθειν
218
mvp-comment-128-1
δεινοῖς ἠναγκάσθην
219
mvp-comment-129-1
ὀργά
220
ἔξοιδ’
221
mvp-comment-130-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
222
mvp-comment-130-2
ἐν … δεινοῖς
223
mvp-comment-130-3
σχήσω
224
mvp-comment-130-4
ταύτας ἄτας
225
mvp-comment-131-1
ὄφρα
226
mvp-comment-131-2
βίος ἔχῃ με
227
σχήσω
228
mvp-comment-132-1
τίνι γάρ … τίνι φρονοῦντι καίρια
229
ἀκούσαιμ’ ἂν πρόσφορον ἔπος
230
τίνι
231
πρόσφορον
232
mvp-comment-132-2
Other explanations are:—(1) Taking the dative with
πρόσφορον
:—‘To what person who feels aright would that word be suitable which I should hear (=which would be said of me)?’ That is: Should I not deserve to incur a censure from which every right-minded person would shrink? Should I not deserve to be called
δυσσεβής
? This seems forced; and it does not well suit
ἔπος
. (2) Taking the dative with
ἀκούσαιμι
:—‘At whose mouth (=
from whom), that thinks aright, could I hear a suitable word of comfort?’ But such a dative seems impossible. In
Il. 16. 515
δύνασαι δὲ σὺ πάντοσ’ ἀκούειν
|
ἀνέρι κηδομένῳ
, the dat. is one of interest, denoting the person whose prayer is heard (‘
for him’); cp.
Il. 5. 115
κλῦθί μοι
: 24. 335
ἔκλυες ᾧ κ’ ἐθέλῃσθα
.
mvp-comment-133-1
ἄνετε
233
mvp-comment-133-2
ἄλυτα
234
mvp-comment-133-3
κεκλήσεται
235
mvp-comment-133-4
231 f. For
ἐκ
236
mvp-comment-133-5
ἀνάριθμος
237
θρήνων
238
mvp-comment-134-1
ἀλλ’ οὖν
239
γε
240
εὐνοίᾳ
241
mvp-comment-135-1
μάτηρ ὡσεί τις
242
mvp-comment-136-1
μὴ τίκτειν
243
mvp-comment-136-2
ἄταν ἄταις
244
mvp-comment-137-1
καὶ τί μέτρον
245
κακότατος
246
mvp-comment-137-2
φέρε
247
mvp-comment-137-3
ἐπὶ τοῖς φθ.
248
mvp-comment-138-1
ἔβλαστ’
249
mvp-comment-139-1
τούτοις
250
mvp-comment-140-1
εἴ τῳ πρόσκειμαι χρηστῷ
251
mvp-comment-141-1
ξυνναίοιμ’
252
mvp-comment-141-2
εὔκηλος
253
mvp-comment-141-3
γονέων
254
ἐκτίμους
255
mvp-comment-141-4
ἐκτίμους ἵσχουσα
256
mvp-comment-141-5
πτέρυγας … γόων
257
mvp-comment-141-6
ὀξυτόνων
258
mvp-comment-142-1
εἰ γὰρ
259
mvp-comment-142-2
γᾶ
260
mvp-comment-142-3
οὐδὲν
261
ὢν
262
εἰ
263
mvp-comment-142-4
Electra is contrasting her father, whose earthly life has been cut short, with his murderers, who survive. But she believes that his spirit lives in the world below, and will be active in aiding the vengeance (453 ff.).
mvp-comment-142-5
πάλιν
264
mvp-comment-142-6
ἀντιφόνους δίκας
265
mvp-comment-143-1
ἔρροι τ’
266
mvp-comment-143-2
αἰδὼς
267
εὐσέβεια
268
mvp-comment-144-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
269
mvp-comment-144-2
καὶ
270
τὸ σὸν … καὶ τοὐμὸν
271
mvp-comment-145-1
νίκα
272
mvp-comment-145-2
ἅμα
273
mvp-comment-146-1
πολλοῖσι θρήνοις
274
mvp-comment-147-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
275
mvp-comment-148-1
ἥτις εὐγενὴς γυνή
276
mvp-comment-149-1
πατρῷα … πήματα
277
mvp-comment-150-1
κατ’ εὐφρόνην
278
mvp-comment-150-2
θάλλοντα
279
mvp-comment-151-1
ᾗ
280
mvp-comment-151-2
πρῶτα μὲν … εἶτα … ἔπειτα
281
ᾗ
282
mvp-comment-151-3
τὰ μητρὸς
283
mvp-comment-151-4
ἔχθιστα συμβέβηκεν
284
mvp-comment-152-1
κἀκ τῶνδ’ ἄρχομαι
285
mvp-comment-153-1
λαβεῖν … τὸ τητᾶσθαι
286
mvp-comment-154-1
ποίας
287
δοκεῖς
288
mvp-comment-155-1
ἴδω
289
εἰσίδω δ’
290
ἴδω δὲ
291
mvp-comment-155-2
μὲν
292
mvp-comment-156-1
ἐσθήματα
293
mvp-comment-156-2
ἐκείνῳ
294
mvp-comment-156-3
παρεστίους … λοιβάς
295
ἔνθ’ ἐκεῖνον ὤλεσεν
296
mvp-comment-156-4
Acc. to
Homer. Hymn. 29. 4 ff., feasts began and ended with libations to Hestia:
οὐ γὰρ ἄτερ σοῦ
|
εἰλαπίναι θνητοῖσιν, ἵν’ οὐ πρώτῃ πυμάτῃ τε
|
Ἱστίῃ ἀρχόμενος σπένδει μελιηδέα οἶνον
. Soph. fr. 658
<*> πρῷρα λοιβῆς Ἑστία
. Other divinities, including Zeus
σωτήρ
, were similarly honoured; then the paean was sung, and the
πότος
began ( Plat.
Symp.p. 176 A).
mvp-comment-157-1
τούτων
297
mvp-comment-158-1
αὐτοέντην
298
mvp-comment-158-2
Brunck first adopted
αὐτοέντην
299
αὐτοφόντην
300
mvp-comment-158-3
ἡμὶν
301
mvp-comment-159-1
ταλαίνῃ
302
mvp-comment-160-1
ταύτην … τῷδε
303
mvp-comment-161-1
μιάστορι
304
Ἐρινὺν
305
mvp-comment-162-1
ἐγγελῶσα τοῖς ποιουμένοις
306
mvp-comment-163-1
εὑροῦς’
307
τότε
308
mvp-comment-163-2
The conjecture
φρουροῦς’
309
τηροῦς’
310
mvp-comment-164-1
χοροὺς ἵστησι
311
mvp-comment-164-2
μηλοσφαγεῖ … ἱερὰ
312
mvp-comment-164-3
ἔμμην’ ἱερά
313
mvp-comment-164-4
τοῖς σωτηρίοις
314
mvp-comment-164-5
Argive tradition placed Agamemnon's death on the 13th of Gamelion (about the end of January). So said ‘the Argive historians’ (
οἱ Ἀργολικοὶ συγγραφεῖς
),— according to an Argive writer named Deinias, who lived about 225 B.C. (Schol. here: Müller,
Frag. Hist. vol. III. p. 25.) Possibly, then, the idea of Clytaemnestra's hideous festival may have been suggested to the poet by some actual commemoration of the event in Argolis. There was a cult of Agamemnon in various places,—notably in Laconia. (Cp. Roscher's
Lexicon, p. 96.)
mvp-comment-165-1
ἡ δύσμορος
315
κατὰ στέγας
316
mvp-comment-166-1
τέτηκα
317
mvp-comment-166-2
πατρὸς
318
mvp-comment-166-3
The
δαίς
is the feast which, in Homeric fashion (
Il. 1. 467
), would follow the sacrifice (281). Acc. to Eustathius p. 1507. 61 (on
Hom.
Od. 4. 524
ff.),
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαὶς
(or
τράπεζα
) was a proverb
ἐπὶ τῶν ἐπ’ ὀλέθρῳ εὐωχουμένων
. The poet may mean that Clytaemnestra called the festival
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαίς
, in direct allusion to
δεῖπνα ἄρρητα
(203): and this would give a special point to
ἐγγελῶσα
(277). Cp.
Eur.
Or. 1008
τά τ’ ἐπώνυμα δεῖπνα Θυέστου
. But the words do not necessarily imply more than that she called it
Ἀγαμεμνόνεια
.
mvp-comment-167-1
αὐτὴ πρὸς αὑτήν
319
αὑτήν
320
mvp-comment-167-2
κλαῦσαι
321
mvp-comment-167-3
ἡδονὴν φέρει
322
mvp-comment-168-1
ἡ λόγοισι γενναία
323
mvp-comment-169-1
φωνοῦσα
324
mvp-comment-170-1
δύσθεον
325
mvp-comment-170-2
μίσημα
326
mvp-comment-170-3
σοὶ μόνῃ
327
mvp-comment-170-4
τέθνηκεν
328
mvp-comment-170-5
ἐν πένθει
329
mvp-comment-171-1
ἐκ γόων
330
mvp-comment-171-2
οἱ κάτω θεοί
331
mvp-comment-172-1
τάδ’
332
mvp-comment-172-2
ἥξοντ’ Ὀρέστην
333
mvp-comment-173-1
παραστᾶς’
334
mvp-comment-174-1
ἥτις
335
mvp-comment-174-2
ὑπεξέθου
336
mvp-comment-175-1
ἀλλ’ ἴσθι τοι τείσουσά γ’
337
mvp-comment-176-1
ὑλακτεῖ
338
mvp-comment-176-2
σὺν
339
mvp-comment-176-3
πέλας
340
παρών
341
mvp-comment-176-4
301 The adv.
πάντα
342
mvp-comment-176-5
ἄναλκις
343
mvp-comment-176-6
ἡ πᾶσα βλάβη
344
mvp-comment-177-1
σὺν γυναιξὶ
345
mvp-comment-177-2
τὰς μάχας
346
mvp-comment-178-1
ἐφήξειν
347
mvp-comment-179-1
μέλλων … δρᾶν τι
348
mvp-comment-179-2
τὰς οὔσας τε … καὶ τὰς ἀπούσας
349
mvp-comment-179-3
μου
350
μοι
351
mvp-comment-179-4
διέφθορεν
352
mvp-comment-180-1
σωφρονεῖν
353
εὐσεβεῖν
354
mvp-comment-180-2
ἔν τοι κακοῖς
355
mvp-comment-180-3
πολλή )στ’ ἀνάγκη
356
κἀπιτηδεύειν κακά
357
mvp-comment-180-4
I place only a comma, not a colon, after
πάρεστιν
358
mvp-comment-181-1
ὄντος … βεβῶτος
359
mvp-comment-182-1
ἦ κάρτα
360
mvp-comment-182-2
θυραῖον
361
mvp-comment-182-3
οἰχνεῖν
362
mvp-comment-182-4
ἀγροῖσι
363
mvp-comment-182-5
τυγχάνει
364
mvp-comment-183-1
ἦ κἂν … ἱκοίμην
365
ἦ τ<*>ν
366
ἦ δἂν
367
mvp-comment-183-2
ἐς λόγους τοὺς σοὺς ἱκοίμην
368
mvp-comment-184-1
ὡς νῦν
369
ὥς νυν
370
mvp-comment-184-2
ἱστόρει· τί σοι φίλον
371
τό
372
τά
373
mvp-comment-184-3
With the other punctuation,
ἱστόρει τί σοι φίλον
374
mvp-comment-185-1
καὶ δὴ
375
mvp-comment-185-2
τοῦ κασιγνήτου τί φής
376
mvp-comment-185-3
ἥξοντος
377
ἢ μέλλοντος
378
mvp-comment-186-1
φησίν γε
379
mvp-comment-186-2
ποεῖ
380
mvp-comment-187-1
καὶ μὴν ἔγωγ’
381
γε
382
mvp-comment-187-2
οὐκ ὄκνῳ
383
mvp-comment-188-1
ἀρκεῖν
384
mvp-comment-189-1
ἐπεί
385
mvp-comment-189-2
μακρὰν
386
mvp-comment-189-3
324 Here, as in 316,
νῦν
387
νυν
388
mvp-comment-189-4
δόμων
389
φέρουσαν
390
mvp-comment-190-1
ὅμαιμον
391
mvp-comment-190-2
φύσιν
392
mvp-comment-191-1
Χρυσόθεμιν
393
mvp-comment-192-1
οἷα
394
νομίζεται
395
mvp-comment-193-1
πρὸς θυρῶνος ἐξόδοις
396
φωνεῖς
397
ἐλθοῦσα
398
αὖ
399
mvp-comment-193-2
330 For the absence of caesura, cp.
Ph. 101
n.
mvp-comment-194-1
θυμῷ … χαρίζεσθαι
400
mvp-comment-195-1
καίτοι τοσοῦτόν γ’ οἶδα
401
mvp-comment-195-2
κἀμαυτήν, ὅτι
402
mvp-comment-195-3
333 f. For the repeated
ἄν
403
mvp-comment-195-4
οἶ) αὐτοῖς φρονῶ
404
mvp-comment-196-1
ὑφειμένῃ
405
πλεῖν
406
mvp-comment-196-2
For the image, cp.
Eur.
Med. 524
ἄκροισι λαίφους κρασπέδοις
(with close-reefed sails)
ὑπεκφυγεῖν
|
τὴν σὴν στόμαργον, ὦ γύναι, γλωσσαλγίαν
:
Ar.
Ran. 997
ἀλλ’ ὅπως, ὦ γεννάδα
, |
μὴ πρὸς ὀργὴν ἀντιλέξεις
, |
ἀλλὰ συστείλας, ἄκροισι
|
χρώμενος τοῖς ἱστίοις κ.τ.λ.
: and conversely
Soph.
Ant. 715
ναὸς ὅστις ἐγκρατῆ πόδα
|
τείνας ὑπείκει μηδέν
.
Ovid
Epist. 1. 8. 71
moderatius opta, | Et voti, quaeso, contrahe vela tui.
Shakesp.
Henry VI., pt. iii, act 3 sc. 3. 5
‘Now Margaret | Must strike her sail, and learn awhile to serve | Where kings command.’
mvp-comment-197-1
καὶ μὴ δοκεῖν
407
mvp-comment-198-1
τοιαῦτα δ’ ἄλλα
408
ἀλλὰ
409
ἄλλα
410
mvp-comment-199-1
καίτοι τὸ μὲν δίκαιον
411
mvp-comment-199-2
κρίνεις
412
mvp-comment-199-3
εἰ … με δεῖ
413
mvp-comment-199-4
ἐλευθέραν
414
mvp-comment-199-5
ζῆν
415
mvp-comment-199-6
πάντ’
416
mvp-comment-199-7
ἀκουστέα
417
mvp-comment-200-1
δεινόν γε
418
mvp-comment-201-1
τῆς … τικτούσης
419
mvp-comment-201-2
μέλειν
420
mvp-comment-202-1
τἀμὰ νουθετήματα
421
mvp-comment-202-2
κείνης διδακτά
422
mvp-comment-202-3
ἐκ σαυτῆς
423
mvp-comment-203-1
The text, which has been suspected (cr. n.), is sound; but the train of thought is somewhat obscured by compression.
mvp-comment-203-2
‘You forget your father, and care only for your mother. All your counsels to me come from her. Then (
ἔπειτα
),—that being so,—give up the attempt at a compromise. Make a
choice (
ἑλοῦ γε
). You can be imprudent (
φρονεῖν κακῶς
),—as you say that I am,—and loyal to your dead father. Or you can be prudent (
φρονοῦσα
), and forgetful of him,—as you actually are; you who (
ἥτις
) say, indeed, that you would show your hatred of the murderers if you could; and yet, when I
do resist them, you try to turn me from my purpose. You merely add the shame of cowardice to our woes.’
mvp-comment-203-3
ἔπειθ’
424
mvp-comment-203-4
ἑλοῦ γε
425
mvp-comment-203-5
φρονεῖν κακῶς
426
mvp-comment-203-6
Other explanations are:—(1) ‘Choose to be thought either
lost to right feeling, or, if you have such feeling, then at least
forgetful of your duty.’ (2) ‘Choose to seem either
unintelligent (if you are merely the blind instrument of our rulers); or, if you act with clear understanding (
φρονοῦσα
),—thinking to benefit me,—at least forgetful of your father.’ Both these views assume that the question is merely between two interpretations which might be placed on the present conduct of Chrysothemis. But Electra is putting the dilemma between imprudent loyalty and prudent disloyalty.
mvp-comment-204-1
τῶν φίλων
427
mvp-comment-205-1
ἥτις
428
φρονοῦσα
429
μῖσος
430
mvp-comment-206-1
πάντα
431
mvp-comment-206-2
τιμωρουμένης
432
mvp-comment-207-1
οὔτε … τε
433
mvp-comment-207-2
τήν τε δρῶσαν
434
mvp-comment-208-1
πρὸς κακοῖσι
435
mvp-comment-208-2
δειλίαν ἔχει
436
mvp-comment-209-1
ἐπεὶ
437
mvp-comment-209-2
ἢ μάθ’ ἐξ ἐμοῦ
438
mvp-comment-210-1
ἐπαρκούντως
439
mvp-comment-211-1
προσάπτειν
440
mvp-comment-211-2
εἴ τις ἔστ’ ἐκεῖ χάρις
441
mvp-comment-212-1
ἡμὶν
442
ξύνει
443
mvp-comment-213-1
τὰ σὰ … δῶῤ
444
mvp-comment-213-2
ἐφ’ οἶσι
445
mvp-comment-213-3
χλιδᾷς
446
mvp-comment-214-1
ὑπεικάθοιμι
447
mvp-comment-214-2
πλουσία
448
mvp-comment-214-3
περιρρείτω
449
mvp-comment-215-1
τοὐμὲ μὴ λυπεῖν
450
mvp-comment-215-2
Remark the resemblance to the passage where Antigone—summing up her position—compares the
moral pain of neglecting her duty with those penalties which she contemns:—
κείνοις ἂν ἤλγουν· τοῖσδε δ’ οὐκ ἀλγύνομαι
(
Ant. 468
). There, too, we have a Sophoclean triad of clauses, the third echoing the first,—as
τῆς σῆς δ’ οὐκ ἐρῶ τιμῆς τυχεῖν
here reiterates the sense of
σοὶ δὲ πλουσία... βίος
(n. on
Ant. 465
ff.).
mvp-comment-215-3
One of the scholia recognises the traditional reading, and explains it correctly: —
τοῦτο μόνον ἐμὲ βοσκέτω, τὸ μὴ λυπεῖν ἐμὲ αὐτήν, εἰ
(‘as I should do, if’)
τοῖς φονεῦσι τοῦ πατρὸς πείθεσθαι ἀναγκασθήσομαι
.—The conjectures have been numerous: see Appendix.
mvp-comment-216-1
οὐδ’ ἂν σὺ
451
mvp-comment-217-1
παῖδα
452
mvp-comment-217-2
κεκλῆσθαι
453
mvp-comment-218-1
πλείστοις
454
mvp-comment-219-1
μηδὲν
455
πρὸς ὀργὴν
456
mvp-comment-220-1
ἀμφοῖν
457
τοῖς λόγοις
458
mvp-comment-221-1
τῆσδε … αὕτη
459
πάλιν
460
mvp-comment-222-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
461
mvp-comment-222-2
πως
462
mvp-comment-222-3
μύθων
463
mvp-comment-223-1
οὐδ’
464
κοὐδ’
465
ποτέ
466
mvp-comment-224-1
ἰὸν
467
mvp-comment-224-2
σχήσει
468
mvp-comment-225-1
τὸ δεινὸν
469
mvp-comment-225-2
εἰ γὰρ τῶνδέ μοι
470
εἰ
471
mvp-comment-226-1
γὰρ
472
mvp-comment-226-2
γόων
473
λόγων
474
mvp-comment-227-1
ἐνταῦθα
475
mvp-comment-227-2
ἔνθα μή ποτε … προσόψει
476
mvp-comment-227-3
ζῶσα
477
mvp-comment-227-4
κατηρεφεῖ
478
mvp-comment-227-5
χθονὸς τῆσδ’ ἐκτὸς
479
mvp-comment-227-6
ὑμνήσεις
480
mvp-comment-228-1
πρὸς ταῦτα
481
mvp-comment-228-2
Nauck reads
κοὔ
482
καί
483
mvp-comment-228-3
ἐν καλῷ, εὔκαιρον
schol.:
H. 4. 3. 5
νομίσαντες οὐκ ἐν καλῷ εἶναι πρὸς τοὺς ὁπλίτας ἱππομαχεῖν
: so, too,
Eur.
Heracl. 971
, etc. Cp.
καλόν
(
ἐστι
)=
καίριον
in
Soph.
Ph. 1155
; and
εἰς καλόν
=
καιρίως
in
O.T. 78.
mvp-comment-229-1
ἦ ταῦτα δὴ
484
ἦ … δὴ
485
ἦ … γὰρ
486
mvp-comment-229-2
καὶ βεβούλευνται
487
mvp-comment-230-1
ἀλλ’ ἐξίκοιτο
488
mvp-comment-230-2
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκ’
489
mvp-comment-231-1
τίνα … τόνδ’
490
mvp-comment-231-2
τάλαινα
491
mvp-comment-232-1
εἴ τι τῶνδε
492
mvp-comment-233-1
ποῦ ποτ’ εἶ φρενῶν
493
mvp-comment-234-1
ὅπως
494
ὑμῶν
495
mvp-comment-234-2
προσώτατ’
496
προσωτάτω φύγω
497
mvp-comment-235-1
βίου … τοῦ παρόντος
498
mvp-comment-236-1
καλὸς γὰρ
499
mvp-comment-236-2
θαυμάσαι
500
mvp-comment-237-1
τοῖς φίλοις
501
mvp-comment-238-1
εἰκαθεῖν
502
mvp-comment-239-1
ταῦτα
503
οὐκ ἐμοὺς
504
mvp-comment-240-1
γε
505
μέντοι
506
mvp-comment-240-2
μὴ )ξ
507
mvp-comment-240-3
πεσεῖν
508
mvp-comment-240-4
399 A woman, speaking of herself in the plur., uses the masc.:
Ant. 926
παθόντες ἂν ξυγγνοῖμεν ἡμαρτηκότες
.
mvp-comment-241-1
συγγνώμην
509
mvp-comment-242-1
τἄπη
510
mvp-comment-242-2
πρὸς κακῶν
511
mvp-comment-243-1
μή πω
512
mvp-comment-244-1
οἷπερ … ὁδοῦ
513
mvp-comment-245-1
τῷ φέρεις
514
mvp-comment-245-2
ἔμπυρα
515
mvp-comment-246-1
τυμβεῦσαι χοάς
516
mvp-comment-247-1
βροτῶν
517
mvp-comment-248-1
ὃν ἔκταν’ αὐτή
518
ὅν γ’
519
mvp-comment-249-1
τῷ τοῦτ’ ἤρεσεν
520
mvp-comment-250-1
δείματος
521
mvp-comment-250-2
δοκεῖν ἐμοί
522
mvp-comment-251-1
θεοὶ πατρῷοι
523
mvp-comment-251-2
συγγένεσθέ γ’
524
mvp-comment-251-3
ἀλλὰ νῦν
525
mvp-comment-252-1
εἴποιμ’ ἂν τότε
526
mvp-comment-253-1
ἐπὶ σμικρὸν
527
ἐπὶ σμικρῶν
528
mvp-comment-253-2
φράσαι
529
mvp-comment-254-1
σμικροὶ λόγοι
530
mvp-comment-255-1
πατρὸς … δευτέραν ὁμιλίαν
531
mvp-comment-255-2
ἐφέστιον πῆξαι
532
mvp-comment-255-3
This sceptre is described in the
Iliad (2. 101 f.) as the work of Hephaestus, who gave it Zeus; Hermes transmitted it to Pelops, from whom it passed to Atreus and Agamemnon. The Homeric sceptre is often called
χρύσεον
(
Il. 2. 268
, etc.), prob. as being ornamented with gold foil, or studded with gold nails (
Il. 1. 246
χρυσείοις ἥλοισι πεπαρμένον
). Among the objects found at Mycenae are some supposed remains of such sceptres (Schliem.,
Myc. 201, etc.).
mvp-comment-255-4
οὑφόρει ποτέ
533
mvp-comment-256-1
ἔκ τε
534
ἐκ δὲ
535
mvp-comment-256-2
βρύοντα
536
mvp-comment-256-3
ᾧ … γενέσθαι
537
mvp-comment-256-4
The vision resembles that of Astyages, who dreamed that a vine sprang from his daughter Mandanè, the wife of Cambyses,
τὴν δὲ ἄμπελον ἐπισχεῖν τὴν Ἀσίην πᾶσαν
. The
ὀνειροπόλοι
explained this to mean that her son (Cyrus) should reign in his grandfather's stead. (
Her. 1. 108.
) The spreading branches figure also in the dream of Xerxes (7. 19):
ἐδόκεε...ἐστεφανῶσθαι ἐλαίης θαλλῷ, ἀπὸ δὲ τῆς ἐλαίης τοὺς κλάδους γῆν πᾶσαν ἐπισχεῖν
.
mvp-comment-256-5
In choosing the
sceptre of Agamemnon as the stock from which the wondrous growth is put forth, Sophocles may have had in mind the words of Achilles (
Il. 1. 234
ff.);
ναὶ μὰ τόδε σκῆπτρον· τὸ μὲν οὔποτε φύλλα καὶ ὄζους
|
φύσει, ἐπεὶ δὴ πρῶτα τομὴν ἐν ὄρεσσι λέλοιπεν
, |
οὐδ’ ἀναθηλήσει
.
mvp-comment-257-1
του παρόντος
538
τοῦ
539
παρόντος
540
του
541
mvp-comment-257-2
Ἡλίῳ δείκνυσι τοὖναρ
542
mvp-comment-258-1
οὐ κάτοιδα, πλὴν
543
mvp-comment-258-2
πέμπει με κείνη
544
mvp-comment-259-1
These three verses, which the MSS. give to Electra, and which several recent critics reject (cr. n.), clearly belong to Chrysothemis, and are genuine. Electra's exclamation of joy (411) caused Chrysothemis to ask if her sister had any ground for hope (412). Electra replied that, when she had heard the dream, she would say. This showed her sister that Electra relied merely on the fact that Clytaemnestra had seen
some fearful vision. Now, therefore, instead of asking for Electra's interpretation, she merely repeats her counsel (383 f.) before proceeding on her errand. The words
πρός
νυν θεῶν κ.τ.λ.
(428 ff.) show the train of her thought. To Chrysothemis, the alarm of Clytaemnestra (427) is more important than the apparition of Agamemnon. The dream is only a new reason why Electra should be cautious,—not why she should hope.
mvp-comment-259-2
The current ascription of the verses to Electra was doubtless prompted by verse 413. It was supposed that the recital of Chrysothemis must be immediately followed by the comments of Electra. But, as Hermann observed, the phrase
ἀβουλίᾳ πεσεῖν
would alone suffice to show that the verses belong to Chrysothemis (
cp. 398
). Nor could the warning,
σὺν κακῷ μέτει πάλιν
, be fitly uttered by Electra.
mvp-comment-259-3
τῶν ἐγγενῶν
545
mvp-comment-260-1
ἀβουλίᾳ
546
mvp-comment-260-2
σὺν κακῷ
547
mvp-comment-260-3
μέτει
548
mvp-comment-261-1
ἀλλ’
549
mvp-comment-261-2
ὦ φίλη
550
τούτων μὲν
551
mvp-comment-262-1
οὐ … θέμις
552
οὐδ’ ὅσιον
553
mvp-comment-262-2
ἐχθρᾶς ἀπὸ γυναικὸς
554
mvp-comment-262-3
κτερίσματ’
555
mvp-comment-262-4
λουτρὰ
556
mvp-comment-263-1
ἀλλ’ ἢ πνοαῖσιν
557
ῥοαῖσιν
558
mvp-comment-263-2
κρύψον
559
mvp-comment-263-3
νιν
560
mvp-comment-263-4
ἔνθα μή ποτ’
561
ἔνθεν
562
mvp-comment-263-5
εὐνὴν
563
mvp-comment-264-1
ἀλλ’ ὅταν θάῃν
564
mvp-comment-264-2
The conjecture
ἔστ’ ἂν
565
ὅταν
566
σῳζέσθω
567
mvp-comment-264-3
κειμήλἰ
568
mvp-comment-265-1
ἀρχὴν
569
τλημονεστάτη
570
mvp-comment-266-1
ἔβλαστε
571
mvp-comment-267-1
ὅν γ’ … τῷδ’
572
mvp-comment-267-2
ἐπέστεφε
573
mvp-comment-267-3
442 f. The position of
αὐτῇ
574
mvp-comment-267-4
δέξεσθαι
575
mvp-comment-267-5
It seems, then, a reasonable inference that here, where the reference is to future time, he would have written
δέξεσθαι
576
δέξασθαι
577
mvp-comment-267-6
444 ff. Join
θανὼν ἄτιμος
578
mvp-comment-267-7
ἐμασχαλίσθη
579
mvp-comment-267-8
Two different motives are assigned by the Greek commentators; viz.:—(1) the desire to render the dead incapable of wreaking vengeance (
ὥσπερ τὴν δύναμιν ἐκείνων ἀφαιρούμενοι
): (2) the desire to make an atonement (
ἐξιλάσασθαι τὴν δολοφονίαν—ἀφοσιοῦσθαι τὸν φόνον
). There can be little doubt that the first of these motives was the primitive origin of the custom. If the second was afterwards blended with it, the idea may have been that of offering the severed portions to the gods below,—as a victim was devoted to death by cutting off a lock of hair (
Eur.
Alc. 75
). Apollonius Rhodius seems to present the practice in this light (4. 477): Jason, having slain a foe,
ἐξάργματα τάμνε θανόντος
. Cp.
Etym. Magn.:
ἀπάργματα λέγεται τὰ ὑπὸ τῶν τραγῳδῶν λεγόμενα μασχαλίσματα
.
mvp-comment-267-9
κἀπὶ λουτροῖσιν
580
mvp-comment-267-10
ἐξέμαξ ν
581
mvp-comment-267-11
ἆρα μὴ
582
mvp-comment-268-1
οὐκ ἔστιν
583
mvp-comment-268-2
ταῦτα μὲν μέθες· σὺ δὲ
584
mvp-comment-269-1
βοστρύχων ἄκρας φόβας
585
mvp-comment-269-2
κἀμοῦ ταλαίνης
586
mvp-comment-270-1
†ἀλιπαρῆ
587
λιπαρῆ
588
mvp-comment-270-2
We come, therefore, to a dilemma. (1) The words
τήνδ’ ἀλιπαρῆ τρίχα
may conceal some corruption:
τήνδ’
ought possibly to be
τήνδε τ’
589
ἀλίπαρον
590
mvp-comment-270-3
(2) Or else, if the text be sound,
ἀλιπαρῆ
may mean
οὐ λιπαράν
. There is no doubt that
λιπ
, ‘fat,’ is the root both of
λι^παρός
, ‘shining,’ and of
λι—παρής
, ‘sticking’; cp.
Plat.
Crat. 427 B
τὸ λιπαρὸν καὶ τὸ κολλῶδες
(
Curt.
Etym. § 340
). Similarly
γλίσχρος
, ‘sticky,’ came to mean ‘importunate.’ It is barely possible that, in coining a new negative compound, the poet may have transferred the sense of
λιπαρός
to
λιπαρής
: but it seems improbable.
mvp-comment-271-1
ζῶμα
591
mvp-comment-271-2
χλιδαῖς
592
mvp-comment-272-1
προσπίτνουσα
593
αὐτὸν
594
mvp-comment-273-1
ἐξ ὑπερτέρας χερός
595
mvp-comment-273-2
ζῶντ’
596
mvp-comment-274-1
ἀφνεωτέραις
597
mvp-comment-274-2
στέφωμεν
598
mvp-comment-274-3
δωρούμεθα
599
mvp-comment-275-1
οἶμαι μὲν οὖν
600
mvp-comment-275-2
If
μέλον
601
μέλειν
602
μέλον
603
mvp-comment-276-1
σοί
604
mvp-comment-277-1
βροτῶν
605
mvp-comment-278-1
πρὸς εὐσέβειαν
606
mvp-comment-279-1
δράσω
607
mvp-comment-279-2
τὸ γὰρ δίκαιον
608
mvp-comment-279-3
(1)
τὸ δίκαιον
is an acc. of general reference, and
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
is impersonal. ‘With regard to what is (clearly) right, it is unreasonable for two persons to dispute; rather both should hasten on the doing (of it).’ With
ἀλλ’ ἐπισπεύδειν
we supply the notion
δεῖ
from the negative
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
(as from
οὐκ ἔξεστι
in
O. C. 1402
ff.; cp.
O. T. 817
ff.). For the form of the sentence, cp.
H. 7. 3. 7
τοὺς περὶ Ἀρχίαν...οὐ ψῆφον ἀνεμείνατε, ἀλλὰ ὁπότε πρῶτον ἐδυνάσθητε ἐτιμωρήσασθε
. So here the acc.
τὸ δίκαιον
, which represents the object of
δρᾶν
, is separated from it by the parenthesis
οὐκ
ἔχει λόγον δυοῖν ἐρίζειν
. (The first scholium gives substantially this view:
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον φιλονεικεῖν περὶ τοῦ δικαίου, ὥστε περὶ αὐτοῦ δύο ὄντας ἐρίζειν
.)
mvp-comment-279-4
(2) Or
τὸ δίκαιον
might be nom.: ‘that which is clearly right does not
afford any ground (
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
) for two persons to dispute,’ etc. So the second schol.:
ἢ τὸ οὐκ ἔχει λόγον ἀντὶ τοῦ οὐ παρέχει πρόφασιν
. So far as the verb
ἔχει
is concerned, this sense is quite admissible: cp.
Thuc. 2. 41
οὔτε τῷ πολεμίῳ ἐπελθόντι ἀγανάκτησιν ἔχει
(
ἡ πόλις
). The objection is that the phrases
ἔχειν λόγον, οὐκ ἔχειν λόγον
, which are very common, regularly mean, ‘to be reasonable,’ ‘to be unreasonable.’ This is so both in the personal and in the impersonal constr.; as Plat.
Phaedop. 62 D
τὸ γὰρ μὴ ἀγανακτεῖν...οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
:
Dem. or. 36 § 54
πῶς ἔχει λόγον σὲ...δίκην ἀξιοῦν λαμβάνειν
; The supposed sense, ‘not to
afford a reason,’ is unexampled.
mvp-comment-279-5
δυοῖν
609
mvp-comment-280-1
παρ’ ὑμῶν
610
mvp-comment-281-1
πικρὰν
611
δοκῶ με … τολμήσειν
612
ἔτι
613
mvp-comment-282-1
εἰ μὴ )γὼ
614
mvp-comment-282-2
γνώμας λειπομένα
615
mvp-comment-283-1
ἁ πρόμαντις Δίκα
616
mvp-comment-283-2
δίκαια φερομένα χεροῖν κράτη
617
mvp-comment-284-1
μέτεισιν
618
mvp-comment-284-2
οὐ μακροῦ χρόνου
619
mvp-comment-285-1
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
620
κλύουσαν
621
mvp-comment-285-2
ἁδυπνόων … ὀνειράτων
622
mvp-comment-286-1
ἀμναστεῖ γ’ ὁ φύσας ς’
623
mvp-comment-287-1
χαλκόπλακτος
624
mvp-comment-287-2
γένυς
625
mvp-comment-287-3
The very axe (
φόνιος πέλεκυς
, 99) with which the blow was dealt is imagined as nourishing a grudge against the murderers who had set it such a task. Such a personification recalls that practice of Athenian law by which inanimate objects which had caused death were brought to a formal trial in the court called
τὸ ἐπὶ Πρυτανείῳ
, and, after sentence, cast beyond the boundaries, in the presence of the Archon Basileus and the sacrificial officers of the tribes (
φυλο‐
βασιλεῖς
). Aeschin. or. 3 § 244
τὰ μὲν ξύλα καὶ τοὺς λίθους καὶ τὸν σίδηρον, τὰ ἄφωνα καὶ ἀγνώμονα, ἐάν τῳ ἐμπεσόντα ἀποκτείνῃ, ὑπερορίζομεν
. (Cp.
Dem. or. 23 § 76
.) A like conception was implied in the English law (repealed in 1846) of ‘deodands’ (Deo danda),
i.e., personal chattels (whether animals or things) which, having caused the death of a human being, were forfeited to the Crown for pious uses.
mvp-comment-288-1
ἐν αἰκίαις
626
mvp-comment-289-1
καὶ πολύπους καὶ πολύχειρ
627
mvp-comment-290-1
λόχοις
628
mvp-comment-290-2
χαλκόπους
629
mvp-comment-291-1
ἄλεκτρ’ ἄνυμφα
630
mvp-comment-291-2
γάμων ἁμιλλήμαθ’
631
mvp-comment-291-3
ἐπέβα
632
mvp-comment-292-1
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι … συνδρῶσιν
633
mvp-comment-292-2
Verses 495—497 (
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι...τέρας
) answer metrically to vv. 479—481
ὕπεστί μοι...ὀνειράτων
, where the text is certain, save for the doubt whether
θράσος
or
θάρσος
should stand in 479. Here we must first decide two points.
mvp-comment-292-3
(1) Are the words
πρὸ τῶνδε
634
mvp-comment-292-4
(2) Could
ἔχει με, μήποτε τέρας πελᾶν
(etc.) mean, ‘
the belief possesses me, that’ etc.? Surely not. No real parallel for so strange a phrase has been produced. It is irrelevant to quote those impersonal verbs which directly express the
occurrence of a thought to the mind; as
Xen.
An. 6. 1. 17
εἰσῄει αὐτοὺς ὅπως ἂν καὶ ἔχοντές τι οἴκαδε ἀφίκοιντο
(‘the thought came to them, how they might,’ etc.):
Thuc. 6. 78.
§ 1
εἰ δέ τῳ ἄρα παρέστηκε, τὸν μὲν Συρακόσιον...πολέμιον εἶναι κ.τ.λ.
Either, then, the subject to
ἔχει
has dropped out, or the words
μ’ ἔχει
conceal a corruption.
mvp-comment-292-5
The following remedies are possible: I incline to the first, as involving least change. (1) Reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
, we may read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοί μ’ ἔχει
|
<θάρσος τι>, μήποθ’ ἡμῖν
etc. (It may be remarked that
τι
is in harmony with the tone of
ὕπεστί μοι
in 479.) Another available word is
ξύννοια
(cp.
Ant. 279
). (2) Or, reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θάρσος
, we could read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι θάρσος ἴσχει με
. On either view, the
υ
of
ἁδυπνόων
in 480 is long (as several critics have assumed). It should be noted that (1) involves a different constitution of the verses: see p. lxxxii.
mvp-comment-292-6
In those MSS. which have
μή ποτε μή ποθ’ ἡμῖν
635
mvp-comment-293-1
ἀψεγές
636
ἀψεφές
637
mvp-comment-293-2
πελᾶν
638
mvp-comment-294-1
τοῖς δρῶσι
639
τοῖς συνδρῶσιν
640
mvp-comment-295-1
μαντεῖαι βροτῶν
641
mvp-comment-296-1
εὖ κατασχήσει
642
mvp-comment-297-1
ἱππεία
643
mvp-comment-297-2
Oenomaüs, king of Pisa in Elis, had promised the hand of his daughter Hippodameia to the suitor who should defeat him in a chariot-race; the penalty of failure being death. The young Pelops, son of Tantalus, offered himself as a competitor. Myrtilus, the charioteer of Oenomaüs, was persuaded (either by Hippodameia or by Pelops) to betray his master. He did so by leaving out one or both of the linch-pins by which the naves of the chariot-wheels were secured to the axles.
Tzetzes on Lycophron 156
ταῖς χοινίκισι
(=
πλήμναις
, the naves)
τῶν τροχῶν οὐκ ἐμβαλὼν τοὺς ἥλους
. According to another story, he substituted a linch-pin of wax for a real one (
schol. Apoll. Rh. 752
ἐμβαλόντα κήρινον ἔμβολον ἐπὶ τοῦ ἀκραξονίου
). So Pelops won the race, and the bride. But Oenomaüs was soon avenged on the traitor; for Myrtilus insulted Hippodameia, and was thrown into the sea by Pelops; upon whose house he invoked a curse, as he sank.
mvp-comment-297-3
Euripides, too, (
Or. 990
ff.,
Helen. 386 f.) refers to this chariot-race as the event with which the troubles of the Pelopidae began. Apollonius Rhodius briefly describes the critical moment of the race as one of the subjects embroidered on the cloak of Jason (1. 752 ff.); there Oenomaüs was seen, ‘falling sideways, as the axle broke at the naves of the wheels,’—
ἄξονος ἐν πλήμνῃσι παρακλιδὸν ἀγνυμένοιο
|
πίπτεν
.
mvp-comment-297-4
The eastern pediment of the temple of Zeus at Olympia (
circ. 450 B.C.) was adorned with sculptures by Paeonius, representing the preparation for this contest (
Paus. 5. 10. 6
). The fragments found on the site have sufficed for a reconstruction of the group. Zeus occupied the centre; to the right of him were Pelops and Hippodameia; to the left, Oenomaüs and his wife Steropè. On each side was a chariot drawn by four horses. Myrtilus was sitting in front of his team, with his face turned away from his master.
mvp-comment-297-5
In the older and nobler form of the myth, Pelops won, not by a fraud, but by the grace of Poseidon, who gave him winged horses (Pindar
O. 1. 87
ἔδωκεν δίφρον τε χούσεον πτεροῖσίν τ’ ἀκάμαντας ἵππους
). On the chest (
λάρναξ
) of Cypselus, seen by Pausanias in the Heraeum at Olympia (
Paus. 5. 17. 5
), Pelops was driving two winged horses.
mvp-comment-298-1
αἰανὴς
644
mvp-comment-298-2
The form
αἰανὴς
has the best authority, and some critics hold that
αἰανὸς
(Hesych.) was a Byzantine invention. But in
Aesch.
Eum. 416
,
ἡμεῖς γάρ ἐσμεν νυκτὸς αἰανῆς τέκνα
(so L, schol., and Tzetzes on Lycophron 406),
αἰανῆ
is far less suitable.
mvp-comment-299-1
εὖτε
645
mvp-comment-299-2
ὁ ποντισθεὶς Μυρτίλος
646
mvp-comment-299-3
A vase found at Capua shows Pelops and Hippodameia in a ship, from which Myrtilus is falling backwards into the water. A winged Erinys hovers in the air above, brandishing a sword over the head of Pelops (Baumeister,
Denkmäler p. 1204, referring to
Mon. Inst. x. 25).
mvp-comment-299-4
ἐκοιμάθη
647
mvp-comment-300-1
παγχρυσέων δίφρων
648
mvp-comment-301-1
πρόρριζος
649
mvp-comment-301-2
ἐκριφθείς
650
mvp-comment-302-1
ἔλειπεν
651
ἔλιπεν
652
οἴκου
653
οἴκους
654
πω
655
mvp-comment-303-1
πολύπονος
656
αἰκία
657
mvp-comment-304-1
ἀνειμένη
658
μέν
659
mvp-comment-304-2
ὡς ἔοικας
660
mvp-comment-304-3
στρέφει
661
mvp-comment-304-4
Clytaemnestra begins in the same strain as Chrysothemis, who likewise emphasised her reproof by the word
αὖ
662
mvp-comment-305-1
μή τοι θυραίαν γ’
663
mvp-comment-305-2
αἰσχύνειν φίλους
664
mvp-comment-306-1
καίτοι
665
mvp-comment-306-2
δὴ
666
πολλούς
667
mvp-comment-306-3
ἐξεῖπάς με … ὡς
668
mvp-comment-306-4
θρασεῖα
669
τραχεῖα
670
mvp-comment-306-5
ἄρχω
671
mvp-comment-307-1
ὕβριν … οὐκ ἔχω
672
κακῶς κλύουσα
673
mvp-comment-308-1
πατὴρ γάρ
674
mvp-comment-308-2
πρόσχημα
675
mvp-comment-309-1
ἡ γὰρ Δίκη
676
mvp-comment-310-1
ᾗ χρῆν σ’ ἀρήγειν
677
mvp-comment-311-1
The order of words in the MSS.,
ἐπεὶ πατὴρ οὗτος σός
, is probably right; the words would then fall from her with a certain deliberate bitterness.
Cp. 542
:
Ant. 44
ἦ γὰρ νοεῖς θάπτειν σθ’
(n.):
Ph. 101
λέγω σ’ ἐγὼ δόλῳ Φιλοκτήτην λαβεῖν
.
mvp-comment-312-1
μοῦνος
678
Ἑλλήνων
679
mvp-comment-312-2
Nauck requires
τὴν αὐτὸς αὑτοῦ
instead of
τὴν σὴν ὅμαιμον
, because Agamemnon's unique crime was the slaughter of his own child: as if the text did not convey this. Clytaemnestra means, ‘while mourning a father, you forget a sister.’
mvp-comment-312-3
532 f. The regular mode of expression would be,
οὐκ ἴσον λύπης καμὼν ἐμοί, ὁ σπείρας τῇ τικτούσῃ
. But, having written
ὅτ’ ἔσπειρε
, the poet explains
ἐμοί
by repeating the comparison in a new form,
ὥσπερ ἡ τίκτουσ’ ἐγώ
. (For
ὡς
or
ὥσπερ
after
ἴσος
, cp.
Lys. or. 19 § 36
ἡγοῦντο... τὰ ἐκεῖ...εἶναι ἴσα ὥσπερ τὰ ἐνθάδε
.) Those who reject v. 533 omit to notice that, without it, the words
οὐκ ἴσον καμὼν ἐμοί
would be unintelligible. Cp.
Aesch.
Ag. 1417
ἔθυσεν αὑτοῦ παῖδα, φιλτάτην ἐμοὶ
|
ὠδῖν’
.
mvp-comment-312-4
This assertion of the mother's superior claim is a counterpart to the doctrine of Athena in
Aesch.
Eum. 658
f.,
οὐκ ἔστι μήτηρ ἡ κεκλημένου τέκνου
|
τοκεύς, τροφὸς δὲ κύματος νεοσπόρου
. Cp. above,
Aesch. Eum. 366
n.
mvp-comment-313-1
τοῦ χάριν, τίνων
680
mvp-comment-313-2
The alternative, which most editors have preferred, is to take
τίνων
as the participle. But there is an insuperable objection to this, which seems to have escaped notice. The words,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could mean only, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
for what?’ They could not mean, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
to whom?’ The latter would be
τῷ χάριν τίνων
; See (
e.g.)
Aesch.
P. V. 985
καὶ μὴν ὀφείλων ἂν τίνοιμ’ αὐτῷ χάριν
:
Aesch.
Ag. 821
τούτων θεοῖσι χρὴ πολύμνηστον χάριν
|
τίνειν
. Hence the question,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could not possibly be answered by
Ἀργείων
. For, evidently, the latter word could not mean, (‘for a benefit conferred by) the Greeks.’ A scholiast in the Baroccian MS. (cr. n. on 545), who explains
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
by
τίνος χάριν ἀποδιδούς
, plainly meant, ‘showing gratitude for what?’—and his paraphrase was correct; only he overlooked the context.
mvp-comment-314-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ μετῆν
681
mvp-comment-315-1
ἀλλ’ ἀντ’ ἀδελφοῦ δῆτα
682
κτανὼν
683
mvp-comment-315-2
ἀντὶ ἀδελφοῦ
684
mvp-comment-315-3
τἄμ’
685
mvp-comment-316-1
παῖδες … διπλοῖ
686
mvp-comment-316-2
540 f. Nauck would prefer a single verse in place of these two, viz.
οὓς Ἰφιγενείας εἰκὸς ἦν θνῄσκειν πάρος
.
mvp-comment-317-1
ἢ
687
mvp-comment-317-2
ἢ τῶν ἐμῶν Ἅιδης
688
mvp-comment-318-1
δαίσασθαι
689
mvp-comment-318-2
The conj.
λῄσασθαι
690
mvp-comment-319-1
πανώλει
691
mvp-comment-319-2
παρεῖτο
692
mvp-comment-319-3
The sense does not absolutely require us to take
Μενέλεω δ’
693
mvp-comment-320-1
ἀβούλου
694
mvp-comment-320-2
κακοῦ γνώμην
695
mvp-comment-321-1
δοκῶ μέν
696
mvp-comment-321-2
εἰ καὶ
697
mvp-comment-322-1
εἰ φωνὴν λάβοι
698
mvp-comment-323-1
τοῖς πεπραγμένοις
699
mvp-comment-324-1
γνώμην δικαίαν σχοῦσα
700
mvp-comment-325-1
ἐρεῖς μὲν οὐχὶ
701
ἐρεῖς
702
ἐρεῖς … μ’ ὡς
703
mvp-comment-325-2
ἄρξασά τι λυπηρὸν
704
mvp-comment-325-3
τάδ’ ἐξήκους’
705
mvp-comment-326-1
τοῦ τεθνηκότος θ’ ὕπερ
706
mvp-comment-327-1
καὶ μὴν
707
mvp-comment-327-2
λόγους ἐξῆρχές με
708
mvp-comment-328-1
Clytaemnestra has argued that she was justified in slaying Agamemnon, because he had slain Iphigeneia. The topics of Electra's reply are as follows.
mvp-comment-328-2
(1) 558—562. The wife who slew her husband would be a criminal, even if the motive had been just retribution; but the real motive was her love for Aegisthus. (2) 563—576. Agamemnon was not a free agent in slaying Iphigeneia; the act was forced upon him by Artemis. (3) 577—583. Suppose, however, that he was a free agent, and wished to please his brother; still she was not justified in taking his life. (4) 584—594. And in any case her plea does not excuse her for living with the man who helped to slay her husband.—The speech then closes in a strain of reproach and defiance (595 —609).
mvp-comment-328-3
καὶ δὴ λέγω σοι
709
πατέρα
710
φὴς
711
mvp-comment-329-1
εἴτ’ οὖν … εἴτε
712
mvp-comment-329-2
λέξω
713
δείξω
714
mvp-comment-330-1
ὡς οὐ δίκῃ γ’
715
ἔσπασεν
716
πειθὼ
717
mvp-comment-331-1
κυναγὸν
718
mvp-comment-331-2
ποινὰς
719
mvp-comment-331-3
τὰ πολλὰ πνεύματ’ ἔσχ’
720
τὰ πολλὰ
721
ἔσχε
722
mvp-comment-331-4
Acc. to Aesch. (
Aesch.
Ag. 149
f.,
Aesch. Ag. 192
), the Greeks were detained by
adverse winds, blowing from the N.E. : and this seems to have been the account given in the
Cypria (
c. 776 B.C.), Proclus
Chrest. p. 455:
ἐπέσχεν αὐτοὺς τοῦ πλοῦ χειμῶνας ἐπιπέμπουσα
. But other authorities speak of a
calm. Thus
I. A. 9 ff.
οὔκουν φθόγγος γ’ οὔτ’ ὀρνίθων
|
οὔτε θαλάσσης· σιγαὶ δ’ ἀνέμων
|
τόνδε κατ’ Εὔριπον ἔχουσιν
. Schol.
Eur.
Or. 647
ἐπειράθη τῆς θεοῦ ὀργιζομένης καὶ κατεχούσης τοὺς ἀνέμους
. Tzetzes on Lycophron 183
χολωθεῖσα δ’ ἐπὶ τούτῳ ἡ θεὸς τοὺς ἀνέμους κατέσχεν
. Ovid (
Met. 13. 183
) combines both versions:
exspectata diu, nulla aut contraria classi | Flamina sunt.
mvp-comment-331-5
It has been objected that vessels provided with oars need not have been detained by a calm. But the ships of the Greek fleet were not light craft. Each carried from 50 to 120 armed men, besides
σκεύη πολεμικά
: and the warriors were also the rowers (cp.
Thuc. 1. 10
). It is intelligible, then, that they should await the aid of wind before attempting the passage of the Aegaean. We must remember, too, the strong and shifting currents in the Euripus (
στονόεντα πορθμόν
,
Soph.
Ant. 1145
:
παλιρρόχθοις ἐν Αὐλίδος τόποις
,
Aesch.
Ag. 191
).
mvp-comment-331-6
We cannot well render:—(1)‘He
suffered those tedious winds,’—supplying
ὁ πατήρ
from v. 558. Nor: (2) ‘She
directed those tedious winds at Aulis,’—a version which would at least require
ἐπ’ Αὐλίδι
. Cp.
Ph. 1119
ἔχε
|
δύσποτμον ἀρὰν ἐπ’ ἄλλοις
.
mvp-comment-331-7
The conjecture
πλοῖα
723
mvp-comment-331-8
Αὐλίδι
724