Plato Republic 5.450

Paul Shorey (Translator)

Republic. Plato. Paul Shorey (Translator). Cambridge, MA. 1935-37.

Sponsored by Perseus Project, Tufts University.

Funding provided by The Annenberg CPB/Project.

Current edition Perseus

Republic (English) (Plato in Twelve Volumes, Vol. 5-6. Shorey, Paul, translator. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press; London, William Heinemann Ltd. 1935-37 (printing).)

Editions (1)
Πολιτεία Perseus (Platonis Opera Tomus IV: Tetralogia VIII. Burnet, John, editor. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1905.) — 5.450 focus

Notes on the current edition

Republic

1. Cf. Protagoras 330 C.
2. Cf. Theaetetus 184 C, Gorgias 469 C.
3. For the metaphor cf. Euripides Bacchae 710 and
σμῆνος
, Republic 574 D, Cratylus 401 C, Meno 72 A.
4. Cf. Philebus 36 D, Theaetetus 184 A, Cratylus 411 A.
5. Thrasymachus speaks here for the last time. He is mentioned in 357 A, 358 B-C, 498 C, 545 B, 590 D.
6. Lit. to smelt ore. The expression was proverbial and was explained by an obscure anecdote. Cf. Leutsch, Paroemiographi, ii. pp. 91, 727, and i. p. 464, and commentators on Herodotus iii. 102.
7. Plato often anticipates and repels the charge of tedious length (see Politicus 286 C, Philebus 28 D, 36 D). Here the thought takes a different turn (as 504 C). The δέ γε implies a slight rebuke (Cf. Class. Phil . xiv. pp. 165-174).
8. So 498 A. Cf. on Aristophanes Acharnians 434, and Laws 792 A.
9. Cf. 456 C, Thucydides vi. 98, Introduction xvii.
10. εἰ ὅ τι μάλιστα: a common formula for what a disputant can afford to concede. Cf. Lysias xiii. 52, xxii. 1, xxii. 10. It occurs six times in the Charmides.
11. Cf. Introduction xxxi-xxxii, 456 C, 499 C, 540 D, Laws 736 D, Aristotle Politics 1260 b 29, 1265 a 17
δεῖ μὲν οὖν ὑποτίθεσθαι κατ’ εὐχην, μηδὲν μέντοι ἀδύνατον
.
12. ἀγνώμονες = inconsiderate, unreasonable, as Andocides ii. 6 shows.

Commentary

Commentary on Plato, Republic (Plato. The Republic, Vol 1-2. Adam, James, editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1902-1903.) focus

τίθετε . Glauco addresses both Polemarchus and Adimantus. There is no occasion to write τίθει (with Hartman).

οἶον ‐‐ εἰργάσασθε κτλ. Chiappelli ( Riv. di Filologia etc. XI p. 195) finds in this and the following sentences a vaticinium ex eventu of Aristophanes' Ecclesiazusae. But the word παρῆκα shews that the ἐσμὸς λόγων does not refer to swarms of adverse criticism, but merely to the topics which Socrates must now discuss. See App. I, and (on the subject in general) Laws 779 E.

τότε . IV 423 E.

ἃ νῦν ὑμεῖς κτλ. : ‘in appealing to these topics now you’ etc. παρακαλοῦντες means literally ‘calling to you’: “das ruft ihr nun herbei” (Schneider). This interpretation is in harmony with ἐπεγείρετε, and gives the right antithesis to ἐάσοι. Neither “excitantes” (Ast), nor “in disputationem vocantes” (Stallbaum) is quite accurate. J. and C. give two alternative renderings (1) “and in now calling in this fresh argument,” (2) “and in now urging me to this.” But the antecedent can only be ταῦτα.

χρυσοχοήσοντας κτλ. Socrates shudders at the swarm of λόγοι to be encountered. ‘Why,’ says Thrasymachus, ‘it was precisely to listen to λόγοι, and not to smelt ore for gold, that we came here.’ χρυσοχοεῖν is a proverbial expression said of those who neglect their proper duty for some more fascinating— if less profitable—pursuit. Cf. Harpocr. s.v. χρυσοχοεῖον: Δείναρχος ἐν τῷ κατὰ Πυθέου· πάλιν παρ’ Αἰσχίνην ἀποφοιτήσας παρὰ τούτῳ δῆλον ὅτι χρυσοχοεῖν ἐμάνθανεν, ἀλλ’ οὐ τὸ προκείμενον αὐτὸ ποιεῖν ἢ πάσχειν. Here τὸ προκείμενον is λόγων ἀκούειν. The origin of the proverb is thus explained. A heap of gold-dust having been discovered on Hymettus, the Athenian populace deserted their usual avocations, and sallied out to seize it. But as it was guarded ὑπὸ τῶν μαχίμων μυκτήρων (cf. Hdt. III 102 ff. with the parallels cited by Stein), they failed. On returning ἔσκωπτον ἀλλήλους λέγοντες ‘σὺ δὲ ᾤου χρυσοχοήσειν.’ Cf. Suidas s.v. and Leutsch u. Schneidewin Paroem. Gr. I p. 464, II pp. 91, 727. A gloss in Bekker's Anec. Gr. I p. 316 (cited by Schneider) explains χρυσοχοεῖν in Dinarchus as proverbial for πορνεύειν; but it cannot have so offensive a meaning here, for (among other reasons) Thrasymachus and Socrates are now reconciled. Ast's explanation “aurum fundere proverbialiter dicitur, quem magna, quam animo conceperat, spes frustratur” expresses only one side of the proverb: the other—neglecting the duty which lies nearest—is more important and relevant here. “To find an Eldorado” (Warren) may perhaps meet the case. Thomas Gray's explanation is not altogether right: “a proverbial expression used of such as are idly employed or sent (as we say) on a fool's errand.”

μέτρον δὲ κτλ. An argumentum ad hominem, for the sentiment is Socratic: cf. VI 504 C. δέ γε=‘yes, but’ helps to bring out this point. ἀκούειν is the common epexegetic infinitive: cf. III 407 B note To insert τοῦ before τοιούτων (with Herwerden and Richards) is both unnecessary and inelegant.

τὸ μὲν ἡμἑτερον ἔα : ‘never mind us’: we are equal to a long discourse (so also J. and C.).

τῷ μεταξὺ χρόνῳ . The interval between γένεσις and παιδεία is nowhere defined in the Republic: in Laws 794 C it is reckoned at six years. For the regulations applying to this period see infra 460 B—D, and cf. Laws 788 D ff.

οὖν . See cr. n. It is admitted that Π is independent of A, so that οὖν (which most MSS have) may well be right. The tendency to confuse οὖν and ἄν may help to explain A's variants οὔκουν and οὐκ ἂν οὖν in I 333 E. Baiter reads δή. The confusion of ἄν and δή occurs no doubt in MSS, but its frequency has been much exaggerated, as for instance in Cl. Rev. VI p. 338.

ὦ εὔδαιμον . Cf. IV 422 E note

μὴ εὐχὴ κτλ. For εὐχή=an impossible aspiration, a Utopian or chimerical proposal, cf. 456 C, VII 540 D and see Susemihl and Hicks on Arist. Pol. B 1. 1260^{b} 29.

ἀγνώμονες : i.q. ἀνεπιστήμονες, as explained (with reference to this passage) in Bekker's Anec. Gr. I p. 334: cf. Phaedr. 275 A . Hence φρονίμοις in E below. The more usual meaning, ‘inconsiderate,’ ‘unkind,’ is less suitable here on account of δύσνοι.

φίλων κτλ. φίλων though neuter is of course intended to balance φίλοις. The conjecture φιλτάτων (Richards, Hartman) destroys the balance and is in itself superfluous: see Kühner Gr. Gr. II p. 23. Note the characteristic chiasmus ἀσφαλὲς καὶ θαρραλέον—φοβερόν τε καὶ σφαλερόν.