Aristophanes Ecclesiazusae 828

Ecclesiazusae. Aristophanes. . 2026-09-08.

Current edition Experimental

Commentary (Sanjaya, generated; selected passages) (OCR draft) (English) (Source: pnadelofficial/aristophanes-sanjaya, commit c319590c139e5603e71f0699caa0663d823af8ad. Machine-generated source annotations retained; see Sanjaya import audit for coverage and limitations.)

Provisional text from uncorrected OCR; expect errors.

Editions (1)
Ἐκκλησιάζουσαι Perseus (Aristophanes. Aristophanis Comoediae, Vol. 2. Hall, F. W. and Geldart, William M., editors. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1907.) — 834 focus
Translations (2)
Ecclesiazusae (OCR draft) Experimental (English (Anonymous; 1938 compilation). Migrated from Perseus legacy XML; source wording and notes retained. See TEI header and migration inventory.) — 834 focus
English (Sanjaya, generated; selected passages) (OCR draft) Experimental (Source: pnadelofficial/aristophanes-sanjaya, commit c319590c139e5603e71f0699caa0663d823af8ad. Machine-generated source annotations retained; see Sanjaya import audit for coverage and limitations.) — 834 focus

Commentary

Commentary (Sanjaya, generated; selected passages) (OCR draft) (Source: pnadelofficial/aristophanes-sanjaya, commit c319590c139e5603e71f0699caa0663d823af8ad. Machine-generated source annotations retained; see Sanjaya import audit for coverage and limitations.) focus

828. mvp-tlg0019-tlg010-sanjaya-com-eng1-30

Line 828

ὁ Διὸς Κόρινθος καὶ τὸ πρᾶγμʼ οὐκ ἤρκεσεν,
The phrase ὁ Διὸς Κόρινθος is a striking elliptical construction where the genitive of the deity (Διὸς) functions adjectivally to modify the proper noun (Κόρινθος), yet the definite article (ὁ) agrees with the implied masculine noun ἄνθρωπος ('man') or a similar agent, rather than with Κόρινθος itself, which is feminine. This construction, meaning 'the Corinthian of Zeus' (i.e., a man from Corinth associated with Zeus or perhaps a specific individual known by this epithet), relies on the audience's recognition of a specific local cult or proverbial association that is not immediately obvious from the text alone. The genitive here is not one of possession but of origin or association, a usage that requires careful parsing to avoid misidentifying the subject as the city itself.