Notes on the current edition
Introduction to Commentary on Sophocles: Electra
1.
Analysis. I. Prologue: 1— 166. (1) 1st scene, 1— 53.
2.
Euripides seeks to soften the strangeness of the alliance by vv. 37 f., where the
αὐτουργός
says that his ‘Mycenaean fathers,’ though poor, were
λαμπροὶ ἐς γένος
. No doubt the invention of the
αὐτουργός
was primarily suggested to the poet's mind by his feeling that Aeschylus had violated probability when he made Orestes adventure himself in the lion's (or wolf's) den, by going to the palace. But, if Orestes was not to do that, his meeting with Electra could be managed only by fixing her abode somewhere else, at a safe distance from the palace; and how was this to be done?
3.
Vv. 43 ff.:
ἣν οὔποθ’ ἁνὴρ ὅδε, σύνοιδέ μοι Κύπρις
, |
ᾔσχυνεν εὐνῇ· παρθένος δ’ ἔτ’ ἐστὶ δή
. |
αἰσχύνομαι γὰρ ὀλβίων ἀνδρῶν τέκνα
|
λαβὼν ὑβρίζειν, οὐ κατάξιος γεγώς
.
4.
(2) 2nd scene, 54 —81.
5.
(3) 3rd scene, 82 —166.
6.
Though Pylades is with him, Orestes is not supposed to come, directly at least, from Crisa; he is a wandering exile (233 f.), on whose head Aegisthus has set a price (v. 33).
7.
Parodos: 167—212.
8.
This Parodos has been made famous by the story in
Lysander 15. After the surrender of Athens in the spring of 404 B.C., the Peloponnesian leaders were deliberating on its fate, when they chanced to hear this ode sung, and were softened towards the city which had produced such a poet. (
παρὰ πότον τινὸς Φωκέως ᾄσαντος ἐκ τῆς Εὐριπίδου Ἠλέκτρας τὴν πάροδον, ἢς ἡ ἀρχὴ Ἀγαμέμνονος ὦ κόρα..., πάντας ἐπικλασθῆναι κ.τ.λ.
)
9.
II. First episode: 213—431. (1) 1st scene, 213 —340.
10.
(2) 2nd scene, 341 —431.
11.
<*> staslmon: 432 —486.
12.
III. Second episode: 487—698. (1) 1st scene, 487 —552.
13.
Eur.
El. 524—544
. The fact that two locks of hair are
ὁμόπτεροι
—by which she means, ‘of the same colour’—is, she reminds him, no proof of kinship. When he suggests that she should go and see whether the
footprints tally with her own, she observes that (1) the soil is too hard to receive a footprint, and (2) a brother's foot is likely to be larger than his sister's. When he lastly suggests that Orestes may have a garment woven for him long ago by his sister, she replies that by this time it must be much too small for him. Dr Verrall (
Choephori, pp. xxxv ff.) thinks that the meaning of Aeschylus was subtler than that fixed upon him by Euripides. (1) The resemblance between the hair of Orestes and that of Electra was not in
colour merely, but in some Asiatic quality by which the foreign race of Pelops could be distinguished from Achaeans. (2) So as to the footprints: the resemblance meant was not in
size, but in the character of the outline. (3) The
ὔφασμα
was not a
garment, but a small specimen of Electra's work which the brother had with him. Euripides himself seems to make a slip here. Electra reproves the old man for suggesting that Orestes would have deigned, through fear of Aegisthus, to
conceal his visit to the tomb (524—526). That, however, is what Orestes had done (90).
14.
(2) 2nd scene, 553 —595.
15.
(3) 3rd scene, 596 —698.
16.
Second stasimon: 699—746. IV. Third episode: 747— 1146. (1) 1st scene, 747 —958.
17.
M. Patin doubts this,
Sophocle, p. 355. But it is proved by v. 959 (
τοῦδε σῶμ)
), and by 1178 ff.
ἴδετε...δίγονα σώματα
.
18.
(2) 2nd scene, 959 —1146.
19.
Kommos: 1147— 1237.
20.
1224 f.
ΗΛ. ἐγὼ δέ γ’ ἐπεκέλευσά σοι
, |
ξίφους τ’ ἐφηψάμην ἅμα
.
21.
Exodos: 1238— 1359.
22.
1245
ἀλλ’ ἄναξ γάρ ἐστ’ ἐμός
, |
σιγῶ· σοφὸς δ’ ὢν οὐκ ἔχρησέ σοι σοφά
.
23.
1273 f.
σὲ δ’ Ἀρκάδων χρὴ πόλιν ἐπ’ Ἀλφειοῦ ῥοαῖς
|
οἰκεῖν Λυκαίου πλησίον σηκώματος
. The city meant is Tegea, where there was a temple of Zeus
Λυκαῖος
, and where the supposed relics of Orestes were found (
Her. 1. 68
).
24.
1292— 1359.
25.
1302
Φοίβου τ’ ἄσοφοι γλώσσης ἐνοπαί
.
26.
1305 ff.
κοιναὶ πράξεις, κοινοὶ δὲ πότμοι·
|
μία δ’ ἀμφοτέρους
|
ἄτη πατέρων διέκναισεν
.
27.
1345
χειροδράκοντες, χρῶτα κελαιναί
. This description of the Erinyes is exactly illustrated by a vase-painting given in Baumeister's
Denkmäler p. 1116. They grasp the snakes, which are coiled round their arms, near the head, so that snake and arm are, as it were, one.
28.
1347 ff. The play was probably produced at the great Dionysia of March, 413 B.C.