Eusebius Ecclesiastical History 2

ed. Kirsopp Lake, ed. J.E. L. Oulton

Ecclesiastical History. Eusebius. ed. Kirsopp Lake, ed. J.E. L. Oulton. Germany. 2014.

Sponsored by University of Leipzig.

Funding provided by European Social Fund Saxony.

Current edition First1KGreek

Historia Ecclesiastica (Greek) (Eusebius. Historia Ecclesiastica, Volumes 1-2. Lake, Kirsopp, translator; Oulton, J.E.L., translator. London; New York: William Heinemann, G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1926-1932.)

Editions (2)
Historia Ecclesiastica First1KGreek (Eusebius. Eusebii Caesariensis Opera, Volume 4. Dindorf, Luwdig, editor. Leipzig: Teubner, 1871.) — 2.praef focus
Ἐκκλησιαστικὴ ἱστορία Perseus (Eusebius. Historia Ecclesiastica, Volumes 1-2. Lake, Kirsopp; Oulton, J.E.L.; Lawlor, H.J., editors. London: William Heinemann; New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926-1932 (printing).) — 2.arg focus
Translations (1)
Historia Ecclesiastica First1KGreek (Eusebius. Historia Ecclesiastica, Volumes 1-2. Lake, Kirsopp, translator; Oulton, J.E.L., translator. London; New York: William Heinemann, G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1926-1932.) — 2 focus

Notes on the current edition

Ecclesiastical History

1. Αcts 6, 1–6
2. Acts 7, 58. 59
3. Matt. 1, 18
4. Gal. 1, 19
5. Αcts 8, l
6. Acts 11, l9
7. Acts 8, 3
8. Acts 6, 5
9. Αcts 8, 5–13
10. Acts 8, 18–23
11. Acts 8, 26–38
12. Psalm 67, 32
13. Acts 9, 15
14. Gal. 1, 1
15. Αcts 9, 3-6
16. Tert. Apol. 21
17. Tert. Apol.
18. Psalm. 18, 5
19. Matt. 3, 12
20. Luke 3, 17
21. Αcts 10
22. Αcts 11, 20–30
23. Joseph. A. I 18, 224; B.I. 2, 180
24. Joseph. A.I 18, 237. 252. 255.
25. Joseph. A.I. 18, 257–260
26. Philo, Leg. ad Gai. 24. 38
27. Philo, Leg. ad Gai. 43
28. Joseph. B.I. 2, 169. 170
29. John 19, 15
30. 1 Schwartz prefers the reading οf BD, ὧν ἐπέγραψεν, but to make scnse this would require the article τῷ before δευτέρῳ. It is possible that the τῷ slipped out by a primitive error, in which case ὧν would be the better reading.
31. Joseph. B.I. 2, 175–177
32. Joeph A. I. 19, 201;B.I.2, 204
33. Acts 11, 28
34. Αcts 11, 29. 30
35. Acts 12, 1. 2
36. l Cf. George syncellus 633, 11–18.
37. Acts 12, 3–17
38. Acts 12 19. 21–23
39. Joseph. A.I. 19, 343–351
40. 1 The feast was probably that pro salute Caesaris which waS celebrated every four years (see Ε. Schwartx, “ Ζur Chronologie des ” ött. Nachr. 1907), and was duc in Α.D. 44 Wben Herod probably died. 2 Note that Eusebius uses the word λόγιον of the Acts: iu view of the fact that the word, literally “ ” is generally used of the Οld Testament it might almost be rendered by “Scripture.”
41. Joseph. A. I. 18, 195
42. 1 Eusebius is usually very accurate in his quotations, but here he varies from the tert of Josephus, who says “ he saw an owl sitting on a certain rope over his head, and at onee understood that it was a messenger ἄγγελος) of evil, as it had formerly been οf ” The allusion is to the story that when Αgrippa, at the loweSt ebb of his misfortunes, was in prison ln Rome he saw an οwl and regarded it as a harbinger οf better days, whieh did indeed soon come (Josephus, Ant. xviii. 6. 7).
43. Acts 5, 34–36
44. Joseph. A.l. 20,97.98
45. Joseph. A.l. 20, 101
46. Αcts 11, 29.30
47. 1 Ιt is remarkeable that Fusebius did not notice that this Theudas of Αctṣ̣ is the Theudas or Josephus and explain the speecb as literary faction. Some think that “ Luke ’’ was misled by Josephus, who happens to mention Theudas in the same context as Judas of Galilee.
48. Justin, Apol. 1 26
49. 1 Cf. George syncellus 630, 15–631, 8 and Zonaras 36, –37, ed. Dindorf.
50. Iren. 1, 23, 2
51. Iren. 1, 23, 1–4
52. 1 Ιn the curiou mixture οf philosophical language with mythological concepts which characterized the theology of the Graeco-Roman world of the first four centuries after Christ, the word here translated “ idea ’’ was one of those used of the various beings proceeding from the original godhead, and bridging as it were the gap between and Creation.
53. 2 Tim. 3, 6
54. 2 Cor. 11, 5
55. Acts 8, 18–23
56. Εph. 6, 14-17 1 Thess. 5,8
57. John 1, 9
58. 1 Peter 5, 13
59. Philo, p. 471, 6,7 Philo, p. 471, 15–472, 3
60. Philo, p. 473, l8-22
61. Philo, p. 474, 17–34
62. Αcts2, 45
63. 1 The ambiguity is due to the fact that the creek word may mean “ service ’’ οr healing."
64. Αcts 4, 34–35
65. Philo, p. 474, 35–44
66. Ρhllο,p.475, 14–22
67. Ρhllo, p.475, 24–476, 2
68. Philo, p 476, 2–5
69. Philo, p. 476, 36–39
70. Philo, p. 482, 3–11
71. Philo, p.483, 42–484, 1
72. Philo, p 476, 23–34
73. Philo, p 481 22–24
74. Philo, p. 484, 33–34
75. Philo, p. 484, 10–21
76. Philo, p. 482, 18–21; P 483, 4–10
77. Philo, p. 481, 32–34. 42; p 482, 3 24. 25;p. 483, 17; p. 484. 6
78. Philo, De mut. nom. 53
79. Rom. 15, 19
80. Αcts 18, 2. 18. 19. 23
81. Joseph. B.I. 2 227
82. Joseph. B.I. 2, 247. 248
83. Joseph. A.I. 20, 180. 181
84. Joseph. B.I. 2. 254–256
85. Joseph. B.I. 2, 261–263
86. Αcts 21, 38
87. Acts 25, 8–12; 27. 1
88. Col. 4, 10
89. Acts 28, 30 31
90. 2 Tim. 4, 16. 17
91. 2. tim. 4, 18
92. 2 Tim. 4, 6
93. 2 Tim. 4, 11. 16
94. 1 cf. George Syncellus 634, –635, 21.
95. Αcṭs. 25, 11. 12; 27, 1
96. Acts 23, 13–15: 25.3
97. Lev. 10, 9 Num 6, 3. Luke 1, 15
98. Νum. 6, 5
99. Is. 3, 10?
100. Cf. Εus. i 22. 7 John 10, 9
101. Luke 20, 21
102. Matt. 26, 64
103. Mark 14, 62
104. l The tradition is obviously confused. Oblias may be an inaecurate transliteration οf the Ηebrew for “ Rampart of the People," but the reference to the prophets defies explanation. The “ Gate” οf Jesus is also a puzzle, but it may be connected with the early Christians’ name for themselves of “ the Way."
105. Is. 3, 10
106. Luke 23 34
107. Jer. 42
108. 1 Cf. George Syncellus 638, 3–641, 2.
109. 1 The first part οf the quotation is from the Wisdom οf Solomon, not Isaiah.
110. 2 This story is confused and improbaable. The text of Hegerippus must be corrupt, for Rechabim is only the Hebrew plural and merelyl repeats the previous phrase. Μoreover the rechabites were a tribe οf Kenites who ere adopted into israel (cf. 1 Chron. ii. 55 and Jer. XXXN. 19). There is no evidence that a Rechabite was ever counted as a Levite, or that the name was that of a sect to which a priest οr Levite could have belonged. Epiphanius (Haer. lxxviii. 14) replaces this mysterious Rechabite by Simeon the son of Clopas.
111. Joseph. A. I. 20, 197. 199–203
112. Joseph. A. I. 20, 197
113. Joseph. B.I. 2, 166
114. Tert. apol. 5
115. 1 The Greek is scarcely translatable and is clearly a bad redering οf Tertullian : “ consulite commentarios uestros, illic reperietis primum Νerοnem in hanc sectam cum maxime Romae orientem Caesariano gladio ferocisse ’’ “ Consult your recods : you will find that Νerο was the first to Ιet the imperial sword rage against this sect when 1 as just springing up in Rome ”).
116. Joseph. B.I. 2. 306–308
117. Joseph. B.I. 2, 284; A. I. 20, 257
118. Joseph. B.I. 2, 462. 265.
119. 1 Cf. George Syncellus 644, 8–645, 9.