Sextus Empiricus Pyrrhoniae Hypotyposes 2.12.141

[141] And of arguments which deduce something non- evident, some conduct us through the premisses to the conclusion by way of progression only, others both by way of progression and by way of discovery as well. By progression, for instance, are those which seem to depend on belief and memory, such as the argument ‟If a god has said to you that this man will be rich, this man will be rich; but this god (assume that I point to Zeus) has said to you that this man will be rich; therefore he will be rich;” for we assent to the conclusion not so much on account of the logical force of the premisses as because of our belief in the statement of the god.