ἄρα
: see on 358 C.
τῷ ὄντι in the same line belongs not to
φήσουσι, but to
τὸν ἄδικον—ἐθέλειν.
βαθεῖαν κτλ.
: “reaping in his thoughts the fruit of the deep furrow, from which good counsel grows” (Verrall). Plato takes
τὰ κεδνὰ βουλεύματα more concretely, and places in apposition thereto
ἄρχειν and the other infinitives down to
ὠφελεῖσθαι, δοκοῦντι being the dative of interest after
βλαστάνει. For the change from the dative
δοκοῦντι to the accusative
κερδαίνοντα cf.
Euthyph. 5 A
and infra IV 422 B, C.
κοινωνεῖν
. Cobet deletes this word, as well as
καὶ κοινωνήματα in
Laws 738 A
πρὸς ἅπαντα τὰ ξυμβόλαια καὶ κοινωνήματα. In view of the same passage Platt (
Cl. Rev. III p. 72) would read
καὶ κοινωνεῖν. No change is necessary, for
κοινωνεῖν is a term of wider connotation than
ξυμβάλλειν (see I 333 A note), and the asyndeton has a rhetorical effect: cf. III 407 B, V 465 C, VI 488 C, IX 590 A notes
πλεονεκτεῖν
recalls I 343 D, E, 349 B ff., as
τούς τε φίλους εὐ ποιεῖν κτλ. recalls the theory attributed to Simonides in I 334 B. Here however it is not Justice, but Injustice masquerading as Justice, which is said to benefit friends and injure enemies.
μᾶλλον προσήκειν
. The comparative is attached to the verb as well as to the adjective, so as to combine the force of two expressions, viz. (1)
ὥστε καὶ θεοφιλῆ αὐτὸν εἶναι μᾶλλον προσήκειν and (2)
ὥστε καὶ θεοφιλέστερον αὐτὸν εἶναι προσήκειν. In cases like
λαθραιότερον μᾶλλον
Laws 781 A,
μᾶλλον is quite redundant: in
Hipp. Mai. 285 A
ἔστι δέ γε—ὠφελιμώτερον—παιδεύεσθαι μᾶλλον ἢ κτλ. it is resumptive. See on the whole subject Kühner
Gr. Gr. II p. 25.
παρεσκευάσθαι ‐‐ ἄμεινον
. For
ἄμεινον Richards would read
ἀμείνον) or
ἀμείνονα: cf. 358 C
πολὺ γὰρ ἀμείνων ἄρα ὁ τοῦ ἀδίκου ἢ ὁ τοῦ δικαίου βίος. The change is tempting at first sight; but Plato generally uses
ἀμείνω and not
ἀμείνονα, and the adverb expresses what is virtually the same meaning, since a
βίος ἄμεινον παρεσκευασμένος (cf.
πόλιν εὖ παρεσκευασμένην
Laws 751 B) is (according to the views here described) a
βίος ἀμείνων. Hermann's
χείρον) for
χεῖρον in
Phaed. 85 B
, though adopted by Schanz, is also unnecessary, for
ἔχειν may be intransitive.
ἔφη
. See cr. n.
ἔφη is present in the majority of MSS, and cannot be dispensed with, where the interlocutor is specified, as here. See
Introd. § 5.
ἀδελφὸς ἀνδρὶ παρείη
:
frater adsit fratri. Ast proposed to insert
ἂν before
ἀνδρί, making the sentence interrogative. The rhythm would thus approximate to the usual paroemiac rhythm of proverbs: but the brevity and force of the proverb would suffer. If change were needed it would be better to adopt Shilleto's elegant suggestion
ἀδελφεὸς ἀνδρὶ παρείη (note on Dem.
F. L. § 262), but even if this was the original expression, it would be quite in Plato's manner to substitute the modern for the archaic word, in defiance of rhythm. The source of the proverb (with which compare
συγγνώμη ἀδελφῷ βοηθεῖν
F. L. § 264) is found by the Scholiast in
Od. XVI 97 f.
ἤ τι κασιγνήτοις ἐπιμέμφεαι, οἷσί περ ἀνὴρ |
μαρναμένοισι πέποιθε, καὶ εἰ μέγα νεῖκος ὄρηται. Cf. also
Il. XXI 308 f. and
Xen.
Mem. II 3. 19.
ἐναντίους
. Adimantus'
λόγοι are
ἐναντίοι, because they praise Justice, and censure Injustice: whereas Glauco had done the reverse:
κατατείνας ε<*>ρῶ τὸν ἄδικον βίον ἐπαινῶν (358 D).
πλούτου
δὲ οὐδέν and Liebhold (
Fl. Jahrb. 1888, p. 107)
κόσμου
δὲ ἄλλο μὲν <ἔχοντ)> οὐδέν for
τοῦτον δὲ ἄλλο μὲν οὐδέν. Neither of these proposals has any plausibility, and it is best to regard this as one of the places where we owe the right reading to
Π .