οὕτω ‐‐ λανθανέτω
. ἐπιχειρῶν ὀρθῶς means of course attempting possible, and abstaining from impossible,
ἀδικήματα. But as an
ἀδίκημα is possible only if the
ἀδικῶν is able to conceal it (the alternative of open violence is recognised later 361 B), it is necessary that the unjust man should escape detection. Hence
λανθανέτω, although
λανθάνειν was not attributed (because not essential) to the pilot and doctor (360 E).
φαῦλον
means a ‘bungler’ (D. and V.). With the sentiment cf.
Prot. 317 A
τὸ οὖν ἀποδιδράσκοντα μὴ δύνασθαι ἀπξδρᾶναι, ἀλλὰ καταφανῆ εἶναι, πολλὴ μωρία καὶ τοῦ ἐπιχειρήματος: also
Laws 845 B, and the Spartan practice of punishing boys not for stealing, but for being caught (Xen.
Rep. Lac. 2. 8). With
ἐσχάτη γὰρ ἀδικία κτλ. the editors compare Cicero
de Off. I 41 “totius autem iniustitiae nulla capitalior est, quam eorum, qui, cum maxime fallunt, id agunt, ut viri boni esse videantur.”
κατ) Αἰσχύλον ‐‐ ἀγαθόν
.
Sept. 592—594 (of Amphiaraus)
οὐ γὰρ δοκεῖν ἄριστος, ἀλλ’ εἶναι θέλει |
βαθεῖαν ἄλοκα διὰ φρενὸς καρπούμενος, |
ἐξ ἧς τὰ κεδνὰ βλαστάνει βουλεύματα. Herwerden would expunge
ἀγαθόν (“mente repetatur
ἁπλοῦν καὶ γενναῖον”), on the ground that if Plato had added any adjective, it would have been
δίκαιον. (The Scholiast substitutes
δίκαιος for
ἄριστος in Aeschylus.)
ἀγαθόν gives excellent sense, and is nearer to the poet's words.
εἴη
is explained by Stallbaum as an optative of wish (though in a subordinate clause): ‘it is not clear therefore whether he is fain to be just,’ etc. This gives a fair sense, but the idiom is obscure, and unsupported by other examples. J. and C. remark that “the optative accords with the conditional nature of the case in an imagined future,” taking
ἄδηλον as for
ἄδηλον ἂν εἴη. But an omitted
ἂν εἴη cannot be responsible for the mood of
τοιοῦτος εἴη, nor could
ἂν εἴη easily be omitted (see Schanz
Nov. Comm. Pl. p. 33). Still less should we accept Hartman's
ἄδηλον <ἂν> οὖν, sc.
εἴη. Madvig ejects
εἴη altogether, understanding
ἐστι after
τοιοῦτος. This may be right, but its intrusion is not easy to explain. I think the word is genuine, and means ‘was’: ‘it is not clear then, say they, whether he was just,’ etc. Glauco again disclaims responsibility: cf. 360 B note
εἴη would in direct speech be
ἦν: and the idiom is like that in III 406 E, where see note. For the sequence of moods and tenses cf. VI 490 A note Failing this interpretation, the word must (I think) be spurious. Herwerden's proposal—
τοιούτῳ εἶναι, ἄδηλον ὄν (retaining
εἴη)—does not surmount the difficulty and is also wrong in point of sense.
ἀπ’ αὐτῆς
. See cr. n. The sense required is not ‘what is produced by’ (
ὑπό) ‘it,’ but ‘what results from it’: cf.
γίγνεσθαι ἀπό (in a similar connexion) 357 C and 358 B. The scribe no doubt assimilated the preposition to the preceding
ὑπό.
ἔστω
. See cr. n. I formerly read
ἴτω with A^{1} and the majority of editors, but I now agree with Schneider that
ἔστω is right.
ἴτω cannot be used by itself as a synonym for ‘live,’ or as a copula: we should require
ἴτω διὰ βίου, instead of
ἴτω μέχρι θανάτου (to transpose the two phrases would of course be too violent a change). The sole authority for
ἴτω is the first hand in A: and this is certainly insufficient to outweigh the inherent superiority of
ἔστω. Most MSS have
ἤτω, a late form for
ἔστω.
ἐκκαθαίρεις
: not ‘polish up’ (J. and C.) but rather ‘scour clean’ (D. and V.), ‘purge’ from all extraneous matter: see 361 C
γυμνωτέος δὴ πάντων πλὴν δικαιοσύνης.
ἀγροικοτέρως
is said with reference to the exaggeration and coarseness of the description: cf.
Ap. 32 D
,
Gorg. 509 A
.
δεδήσεται
: ‘will be kept in chains.’
δεθήσεται (so
v and some other MSS) is required by Herwerden, and may be right. But in
Xen.
Cyr. IV 3. 18
δεδήσομαι is similarly combined with several first futures.
ἐκκαυθήσεται κτλ.
Schneider refers to Hdt. VII 18
θερμοῖσι σιδηρίοισι ἐκκαίειν—τοὺς ὀφθαλμούς, and
Gorg. 473 C
ἐὰν—στρεβλῶται καὶ ἐκτέμνηται καὶ τοὺς ὀφθαλμοὺς ἐκκάηται. That
ἐκκαυθήσεται (and not
ἐκκοπήσεται, the reading of some inferior MSS, and of the ancient authorities who cite this passage) is right here, is probable also from X 613 E
ἃ ἄγροικα ἔφησθα σὺ εἶναι ἀληθῆ λέγων, εἶτα στρεβλώσονται καὶ ἐκκαυθήσονται, whether the last clause is genuine or not. It is not clear that Cicero (
de Rep. III 27) did not find
ἐκκαυθήσεται in his text; for though he has
effodiantur oculi, he adds afterwards
vinciatur, uratur. Herwerden recasts the words of Plato to suit Cicero's translation, but Cicero is a much less trustworthy witness than Paris A.
πλούτου
δὲ οὐδέν and Liebhold (
Fl. Jahrb. 1888, p. 107)
κόσμου
δὲ ἄλλο μὲν <ἔχοντ)> οὐδέν for
τοῦτον δὲ ἄλλο μὲν οὐδέν. Neither of these proposals has any plausibility, and it is best to regard this as one of the places where we owe the right reading to
Π .