Plato Republic 7.540

Paul Shorey (Translator)

Republic. Plato. Paul Shorey (Translator). Cambridge, MA. 1935-37.

Sponsored by Perseus Project, Tufts University.

Funding provided by The Annenberg CPB/Project.

Current edition Perseus

Republic (English) (Plato in Twelve Volumes, Vol. 5-6. Shorey, Paul, translator. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press; London, William Heinemann Ltd. 1935-37 (printing).)

Editions (1)
Πολιτεία Perseus (Platonis Opera Tomus IV: Tetralogia VIII. Burnet, John, editor. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1905.) — 7.540 focus

Notes on the current edition

Republic

1. It is very naive of modern commentators to cavil at the precise time allotted to dialectic, and still more so to infer that there was not much to say about the ideas. Dialectic was not exclusively or mainly concerned with the metaphysics of the ideas. It was the development of the reasoning powers by rational discussion.
2. Cf. 519 C ff., pp. 139-145.
3. Xen. Cyrop. i. 2. 13 seems to copy this. Cf. on 484 D. Critics of Plato frequently overlook the fact that he insisted on practical experience in the training of his rulers. Newman, Aristot. Pol. i. p. 5 points out that this experience takes the place of special training in political science.
4. Cf.
ὑποκινήσαντ’
, Aristoph. Frogs 643.
5. An eminent scholar quaintly infers that Plato could not have written this page before he himself was fifty years old.
6. Plato having made his practical meaning quite clear feels that he can safely permit himself the short cut of rhetoric and symbolism in summing it up. He reckoned without Neoplatonists ancient and modern. Cf. also on 519 B, p. 138, note a.
7. Cf. 500 D-E. For παράδειγμα cf. 592 B and What Plato Said, p. 458, on Euthyphro 6 E, and p. 599, on Polit. 277 D.
8. Cf. 520 D.
9. Cf. 347 C-D, 520 E.
10. Plato’s guardians, unlike Athenian statesmen, could train their successors. Cf. Protag. 319 E-320 B, Meno 99 B. Also
ἄλλους ποιεῖν
Meno 100 A, Gorg. 449 B, 455 C, Euthyph. 3 C, Phaedr. 266 C, 268 B, Symp. 196 E, Protag. 348 E, Isoc. Demon. 3, Panath. 28, Soph. 13, Antid. 204, Xen. Oecon. 15. 10, and παιδεύειν ἀνθρώπους, generally used of the sophists, Gorg. 519 E, Protag. 317 B, Euthyd. 306 E, Laches 186 D, Rep. 600 C.
11. Cf. p. 139, note d. Plato checks himself in mid-flight and wistfully smiles at his own idealism. Cf. on 536 B-C, also 540 C and 509 C. Frutiger, Mythes de Platon, p. 170.
12. Cf. Symp. 209 E.
13. For this caution cf. 461 E and Vol. I. p. 344, note c, on 427 C.
14. Plato plays on the words δαίμων and εὐδαίμων. Cf. also Crat. 398 b-C.
15. Cf. 361 D.
16. Lit. female rulers.
17. Cf. on 450 D and 499 C.
18. Cf. 499 D.
19. Cf. What Plato Said, p. 564 on Rep. 472 B-E, and p. 65, not h, on 499 D.
20. Cf. 463 C-D, 499 B-C.
21. Cf. 521 B, 516 C-D.
22. τὸ ὀρθόν: Cf. Theaet. 161 C, Meno 99 A.

Commentary

Commentary on Plato, Republic (Plato. The Republic, Vol 1-2. Adam, James, editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1902-1903.) focus

πεντηκοντουτῶν . We are told that in Chalcis the magistrates had to be at least 50 years of age: νόμος δὲ ἦν Χαλκιδεῦσι μὴ ἄρξαι μηδὲ πρεσβεῦσαι νεώτερον ἐτῶν πεντήκοντα (Heraclides Fr. Hist. Gr. II p. 222), but advanced age was rarely a condition of holding office in Greek states. See Whibley Gk. Olig. pp. 148 f.

τὴν τῆς ψυχῆς αὐγήν : ‘the radiant light of the soul.’ αὐγή is highly poetic in this sense: cf. Soph. Ajax 70 . There is more than a touch of mysticism in this and similar passages throughout Books VI and VII (cf. especially VI 490 A, B), but it is exaggerated by Krohn ( Pl. St. p. 187), who boldly declares that “the only person who correctly understood the later phase of the Republic was Plotinus,” and that “the so-called Platonic Dialectic is a Missverständniss.”

παραδείγματι κτλ. See VI 484 C, 501 A—C notes

ἑκάστους . See 520 D note

οὐχ ὡς καλόν τι κτλ. 520 E note

ἐὰν καὶ ἡ Πυθία κτλ. See on IV 427 B, C.

ξυναναιρῇ . See cr. n. The error in Α, Π, and several MSS besides, is a pretty example of lipography: contrast προσαναιρῇ in V 461 E, where the temptation is absent and the MSS right. Burnet says that A^{2} has ξυναναιρῇ, I know not on what authority: I found no trace in the MS of anything except ξυναιρῇ.

εὐδαίμοσι . If not δαίμοσιν, then εὐ‐δαίμοσιν.

ὥσπερ ἀνδριαντοποιός . Jowett seems to find an allusion to the fact that Socrates had been a sculptor; but the same words might have been used if he had not: cf. (with J. and C.) II 361 D.

ὡς διήλθομεν . V 451 C ff.

εὐχάς . V 450 D note

χαλεπὰ κτλ. See VI 502 C note

ἢ πλείους ἢ εἷς . See on IV 445 D.

ἀναγκαιότατον . They will admit no compulsion save that of Right; Non civium ardor prava iubentium Non vultus instantis tyranni Mente quatit solida. Contrast VI 492 B—493 D.

ὅσοι μὲν ἂν κτλ. Newman ( Aristotle's Politics I p. 413 note) thinks this proposal is “a softened version of the sentence which Heraclitus passed on the Ephesians for expelling Hermodorus” (Bywater's Heracl. Fr. 114), but the parallel is not very close. Plato's καθαρμός is sufficiently explained by the precepts which he himself lays down in VI 501 A: see also Pol. 293 D and especially Laws 735 B—736 C, where he gives an interesting survey of the various καθαρμοί applicable to commonwealths, and 752 B ff. Whether the καθαρμός of the Republic is itself either possible or adequate is another matter: Grote pronounces it an εὐχή ( Plato III p. 218 note). An age which had witnessed the διοικισμός of Mantinea ( Xen. Hell. V 2. 7 ) might well have regarded it as feasible. ‘Possible, but difficult’ is perhaps the safest verdict. The purgation, even if successfully applied, might not be sufficient to start the city well, but it would be a useful auxiliary to that “express initiative force, exceptional and belonging to some peculiar crisis,” which (according to Grote l. c.) would float the enterprise. Bosanquet raises the question how far the καθαρμός is seriously meant. To me it appears to be neither more nor less serious than Plato's treatment of the general question as to the possibility of his ideal city: see on VI 502 C and Hirmer Entstehung u. Komp. d. pl. Pol. p. 638.

ἐκπέμψωσιν ‐‐ θρέψωνται . Stephanus (with some inferior MS authority) reads the future, which Liebhold also would restore; but ὅταν is carried on. Cf. II 359 B note