ὧν εἰ ἀπαλλαγὲν κτλ.
For the anacoluthon cf.
Laws 810 D, E (Engelhardt
Anac. Pl. Spec. III p. 37). Cobet gratuitously adds
τά before
ἐφ’ ἅ. Cf. 519 A note With the sentiment cf. VI 491 C, D notes, 494 C ff. notes Plato may well be thinking of Alcibiades again. The present passage is a conspicuous proof of the almost boundless influence which Plato ascribed to education, when applied to gifted natures.
σκοπὸν ‐‐ ἕνα κτλ.
The
εἷς σκοπός of Plato's guardians is the Idea of Good, which is therefore clearly not only a metaphysical but also an ethical concept—the goal of conduct as well as the ultimate cause of knowledge and existence. Cf. 540 A and App. III.
ἑκόντες εἶναι
. I 336 E note
τῶν οἰκιστῶν
=‘the founders’ is in explanatory apposition with
ἡμέτερον .
ἐν τῷ πρόσθεν
. VI 505 A.
ἰδεῖν τε κτλ.
depends on
ἀναγκάσαι and explains
ἀφικέσθαι—μέγιστον (J. and C.).
τε balances
καί before
ἀναβῆναι. This explanation is better than to regard
τε as ‘and’ (with Schneider and D. and V.).
ἔπειτα
and
ε<*>τα are used like our ‘what!’ in indignant or quasi-indignant questions. Cf.
Gorg. 466 C
,
Ap. 28 B
and elsewhere, with Blaydes on
Ar.
Av. 911
.
ἐπελάθου κτλ.
πάλιν does not mean that Glauco has forgotten twice, but only that he remembered before. The emphasis falls on
ἐπελάθου rather than on
πάλιν. Plato is thinking of V 466 A, where Glauco says
μέμνημαι when challenged on this point. To this explanation, which he gives as an alternative, Schneider inclines to prefer the view which sees in
πάλιν a reference directly to IV 419 A ff. But the interlocutor there is Adimantus, not Glauco, and even Adimantus in IV could not strictly be said to forget what Socrates for the first time expressly asserts (IV 420 B
οὐ μὴν πρὸς τοῦτο—ἡ πόλις) in reply to Adimantus' difficulties.
νόμῳ
is the reading of all the best MSS, and was restored by Schneider for
νομοθέτῃ. Law is personified throughout the whole sentence: cf. (with Schneider)
Tim. 24 B
.
νομοθέτῃ gives a good sense, but is weaker than
νόμῳ: Law, we feel, is free from selfishness and partiality, but a legislator need not be.
ἐπὶ τὸν ξύνδεσμον
is not ‘so as to be the bond of the State’ (as J. and C. suggest), but ‘for binding the city together,’ with reference to
ξυναρμόττων τοὺς πολίτας. Cf.
Laws 921 C.
τοίνυν
=‘further’ (I 339 D note). Socrates has not yet replied to Glauco's indignant
ἀδικήσομεν αὐτούς; but proceeds to do so now.
οὐδ’ ἀδικήσομεν
: (besides what I have just said) we shall not be wronging them either.
οὐδέ is used in the same way in
Euthyph. 12 A
and
Laws 673 C.
δέ in
οὐδέ cannot mean ‘in spite of what you say’ (as J. and C. imagine).
ὥσπερ ἐν σμήνεσιν κτλ.
is probably a Socratic comparison: cf.
Xen.
Cyr. V 1. 24
(quoted by Ast)
βασιλεὺς μὲν γὰρ ἔμοιγε δοκεῖς σὺ πεφυκέναι οὐδὲν ἧττον ἢ ὁ ἐν τῷ σμήνει φυόμενος τῶν μελιττῶν ἡγεμών. See also Pöhlmann
Gesch. d. ant. Komm. p. 134 note
ἀμφοτέρων
: “et publicorum negotiorum et philosophiae” Stallbaum. Cf.
Gorg. 485 A
ἀλλ), ο<*>μαι, τὸ ὀρθότατόν ἐστιν ἀμφοτέρων μετασχεῖν. Is the
θεωρητικός or the
πρακτικὸς βίος the better? It is clear that the subject was often debated in Plato's time: see the fragments of Euripides'
Antiope in Pl.
Gorg. 484 E
ff. and Arist.
Eth. Nic. I 3. 1095^{b} 17 ff., X 7. 1177^{a} 12 ff. If we contrast them with each other, Plato would reply, the
θεωρητικός easily wins the prize, but under the existing conditions of human nature the best life is a combination of both. The practical statesman must derive his inspiration from
θεωρία, and experience of affairs is an advantage as well as a duty to the thinker. Cf. VI 496 D—497 A notes
ξυνεθιζόμενοι κτλ.
Cf. 518 A note
εἴδωλα
. 517 D note The word is here used quite generally of all the idols of Plato's cave. “We have risen to a point of view from which the
σκευαστά and the
σκιαί are included under one notion as
εἴδωλα” (J. and C.).
ὕπαρ κτλ.
Cf. V 476 C. The Homeric line
οὐκ ὄναρ, ἀλλ) ὕπαρ <*>σθλόν, ὅ τοι τετελεσμένον ἔσται (
Od. 19. 547) is in Plato's mind, though
ὕπαρ and
ὄναρ are here adverbial accusatives (cf. Cobet
V. L.^{2} pp. 523 ff.).
σκιαμαχούντων
: ‘fighting about shadows.’ See 517 D note and cf. IX 586 C note Dreamland is also shadowland.
ἐν πόλει ᾗ κτλ.
On
ᾗ for
ἐν ᾗ see note on
ἐν ἅπασιν οἶς ἔστι III 402 A. Van Cleef (
de attr. in enunt. rel. usu Plat. p. 46) explains the construction as equivalent to
ἐν ᾗ πόλει, comparing
Men. 96 C
, which is however (like
Tim. 45 D
) only an example of inverse attraction.
ταύτην
: an anacoluthon, as in VI 510 E. For the sentiment see I 347 D note
σχοῦσαν
=‘which gets’: a gnomic aorist participle. See Goodwin
MT. p. 55. Richards conjectures
ἔχουσαν, and
ἴσχουσαν (which appears in the margin of A) has slight MS authority; but the inchoative sense (516 E note) is better suited to
οἱ μέλλοντες ἄρξειν.
ἕκαστοι
. The plural implies relays of governors relieving one another from time to time: cf.
ἑκάστοις in 540 B.
μετ’ ἀλλήλων κτλ.
“Far from the madding crowd's ignoble strife.”
ἐν τῷ καθαρῷ means ‘in the undefiled.’ The phrase is half-mystical, as
καθαρόν constantly is in Plato. It is natural to think of the myth of the
Phaedo (109 B ff.
αὐτὴν δὲ τὴν γῆν καθαρὰν ἐν καθαρῷ κεῖσθαι τῷ οὐρανῷ), but we should not translate “sub divo” (Ast), nor even “auf der reinen Höhe” (Schneider). Either version is too precise, and
ἐν καθαρῷ does not mean
sub divo even in Homer. The Ideas in Plato are
τὸ καθαρόν: see
Phaed. 79 D
ἐκεῖσε οἴχεται εἰς τὸ καθαρόν τε καὶ ἀεὶ ὂν καὶ ἀθάνατον καὶ ὡσαύτως ἔχον.
παντὸς μὴν κτλ.
The
πόλις ἀνδρῶν ἀγαθῶν has now been found. That Plato intended to recal the prophecy of I 347 D is clear from the verbal echoes between the two passages. On the absence of the preposition before
τὸ ἄρχειν see VIII 553 B note