Plato Republic 6.487

Paul Shorey (Translator)

Republic. Plato. Paul Shorey (Translator). Cambridge, MA. 1935-37.

Sponsored by Perseus Project, Tufts University.

Funding provided by The Annenberg CPB/Project.

Current edition Perseus

Republic (English) (Plato in Twelve Volumes, Vol. 5-6. Shorey, Paul, translator. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press; London, William Heinemann Ltd. 1935-37 (printing).)

Editions (1)
Πολιτεία Perseus (Platonis Opera Tomus IV: Tetralogia VIII. Burnet, John, editor. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1905.) — 6.487 focus

Notes on the current edition

Republic

1. μεγαλοπρεπής is frequently ironical in Plato, but not here. For the list of qualities of the ideal student cf. also 503 C, Theaet. 144 A-B, and Friedländer, Platon, ii. p. 418. Cf. Laws 709 E on the qualifications of the young tyrant, and Cic. Tusc. v. 24, with Renaissance literature on education.
2. The god of censure, who finds fault with the gods in Lucian’s dialogues. Cf. Overbeck, Schriftquellen, p. 208, n. 1091, Otto, p. 227, s. v. Momus. Cf. Callimachus, fr. 70; and Anth. Pal. xvi. 262. 3-4:
αὐτὸς ὁ Μῶμος φθέγξεται, Ἄκρητος, Ζεῦ πάτερ, ἡ σοφίη
,
Momus himself will cry out Father Zeus, this was perfect skill.
(L.C.L. translation.) Stallbaum refers to Erasmus, Chiliad, i. 5. 75 and interpreters on Aristaenet. Epist. i. I, p. 239, ed. Boissonade.
3. Cf. Unity of Plato’s Thought, p. 35 n. 236, and What Plato Said, p. 488 on Crito 48 B. A speaker in Plato may thus refer to any fundamental Platonic doctrine. Wilamowitz’ suggested emendation ( Platon, ii. p. 205) ἃ ἂν λέγῃς is due to a misunderstanding of this.
4. A locus classicus for Plato’s anticipation of objections. Cf. 475 B, Theaet. 166 A-B, Rep. 609 C, 438-439, and Apelt, Republic, p. 492. Plato does it more tactfully than Isocrates, e.g. Demon. 44.
5. Cf. Apelt, Aufsätze, p. 73, Minto, Logic, Induction and Deduction, pp. 4 ff.; also Gorg. 461 D, 462 A, Soph. 230 B.
6. Cf. Phaedrus 262 B.
7. Cf. 451 A, and Theaet. 166 A, 168 A, 534 C
ἀπτῶτι
.
8. Cf. Phaedr. 262 B, Cleitophon 410 A, Gorg. 495 A, schol.,
τοὺς πρώτους λόγους τοὺς ἑαυτοῦ δηλονότι
, Gorg. 457 E
οἷς τὸ πρῶτον ἔλεγες
, and also Agathon in Symp. 201 B.
9. For this figure cf. Laws 739 A, 820 C-D, 903 D, Eryxias 395 A-B, Hipparchus 220 E, Eurip. Suppl. 409. Aristotle, Soph. El. 165 a 10 ff., borrows the metaphor, but his ψῆφοι are those of book-keeping or reckoning. Cf. also Dem. De cor. 227 f.
10. Cf. Hipp. Minor 369 B-C and Grote ii. p. 64
Though Hippias admits each successive step he still mistrusts the conclusion
also Apelt, p. 492, 357 A-B and Laws 903 A
βιάζεσθαι τοῖς λόγοις
, and also Hipparchus 232 B for the idea that dialectic constrains rather than persuades. In the Ion, 533 C, Ion says he cannot ἀντιλέγειν, but the fact remains that he knows Homer but not other poets. Cf. also 536 D. The passage virtually anticipates Bacon’s Novum Organum,App. XIII.
(syllogismus) . . . assensum itaque constringit, non res.
Cf. Cic. De fin. iv. 3, Tusc. i. 8. 16, and the proverbial
οὐ γὰρ πείσεις, οὐδ’ ἢν πείσῃς,
, Aristoph. Plutus 600.
11. See Soph. 234 E for a different application of the same idea. There is no change of opinion. The commonplace Greek contrast of word and deed, theory and fact, is valid against eristic but not against dialectic. See What Plato Said, p. 534 on Phaedo 99 E, and on 473 A; also What Plato Said, p. 625 on Laws 636 A. A favorite formula of Aristotle runs, This is true in theory and is confirmed by facts. Cf. Eth. Nic. 1099 b 25, 1123 b 22, 1131 a 13, Pol. 1323 a 39-b 6, 1326 a 25 and 29, 1334 a 5-6.
12. Scholars in politics cut a sorry figure. For this popular view of philosophers Cf. Theaet. 173 C ff., 174 C-D, Gorg. 484-486 C, Phaedo 64 B. Cf. also Isoc. passim, e. g. Antid. 250, 312.
13. The perfect tense is ironical in Crat. 384 B, serious in Laws 670 A-B. In Gorg. 485 A it is replaced by
ὅσον παιδείας χάριν
.
14. Cf. What Plato Said, p. 506 on Gorg. 484 C.
15. Cf. Euthydem. 306 E, Protag. 346 A, and for the idea without the word, Soph. 216 C.
16. Cf. Eurip. Medea 299, and on 489 B.
17. Cf. 497 A. In Euthydem. 307 B Plato uses both ἐπιτήδευμα and πρᾶγμα
18. Cf. Gory. 517 D, Laws 644 C, Symp. 215 A with Bury’s note. Cf. the parable of the great beast 493, and of the many-headed beast, 588-589.

Commentary

Commentary on Plato, Republic (Plato. The Republic, Vol 1-2. Adam, James, editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1902-1903.) focus

μνήμων κτλ. The summary is complete, μεγαλοπρεπής being the opposite of ἀνελεύθερος and σμικρόλογος (486 A note).

οἱ ἀκούοντες ‐‐ λέγεις : ‘those who from time to time hear what you now say.’ The text has been suspected, but is, I think, sound. Adimantus implies that the philosopher-king was one of Socrates' favourite themes, as—in one form or another—it certainly was: see on V 473 C. The effect produced by Socrates' usual way of reasoning on the subject is illustrated by a general description of the unsatisfying nature of Socrates' dialectic; and λέγω δ’ εἰς τὸ παρὸν ἀποβλέψας recalls us to the special case. The looseness lies chiefly in the use of ἅ, where οἷα—Steinhart's conjecture — would be expected; but ἅ need not be taken too strictly. Ficinus omits νῦν .

ἡγοῦνται κτλ. Cf. Euthyph. 11 B —D, Men. 80 A , B and the description of the elenchus quoted by J. and C. from Soph. 230 B ff.

μέγα ‐‐ ἀναφαίνεσθαι . For the anacoluthon cf. Ap. 21 C καὶ διαλεγόμενος αὐτῷ, ἔδοξέ μοι, Laws 686 D and Xen. An. III 2. 12. In all these cases the verb used is ἔδοξε, and ἀναφαίνεσθαι is a word of the same kind. Other examples of similar anacolutha are cited by Engelhardt Anacol. Pl. Spec. III p. 39. Richards would read παραγομένοις, but παραγομένοις could hardly mean παραγομένοις ἑαυτοῖς .

ἀποκλείονται κτλ. The simile is probably taken from the game of πόλεις, on which see IV 422 E note φέρωσιν is technical of a move at draughts: cf. Laws 739 A. The balance φέρωσιν— λέγωσιν deserves notice: in both words, stress should be laid on the first syllable. Cf. III 406 B note and Phaed. 83 D with Geddes ad loc. ἐν is used as in Euthyph. 11 C τὰ ἐν τοῖς λόγοις ἔργα ἀποδιδράσκει καὶ οὐκ ἐθέλει μένειν.

ταύτῃ =‘isto modo,’ ‘as you say.’ The simile is imitated by the author of the Eryxias (395 B).

ἔργῳ δὲ ὁρᾶν κτλ. expresses a widely prevalent view in ancient as well as in modern times. It is enunciated with admirable force and vigour by the Platonic Callicles in Gorg. 484 C —486 C: cf. also Theaet. 173 C ff. and Phaed. 64 B . Although Isocrates called himself a φιλόσοφος, he was in general agreement with the popular verdict on Philosophy in the Platonic sense of the term ( τήν τε γεωμετρίαν καὶ τὴν ἀστρολογίαν καὶ τοὺς διαλόγους τοὺς ἐριστικοὺς καλουμένους, as he calls it Panath. 26): see adv. Soph. 1—8, 20, Antid. 258—269 ( διατρῖψαι μὲν οὖν περὶ τὰς παιδείας ταύτας χρόνον τινὰ συμβουλεύσαιμ’ ἂν τοῖς νεωτέροις, μὴ μέντοι περιιδεῖν τὴν φύσιν τὴν αὑτῶν κατασκελετευθεῖσαν ἐπὶ τούτοις κτλ. 268) and Panath. 26— 32 (Spengel Isokr. u. Plato pp. 15 ff., Dümmler Chron. Beitr. pp. 43 ff. and Teichmüller Lit. Fehd. I p. 103. Teichmüller supposes that τις in νῦν γὰρ φαίη ἄν τις κτλ. above is a specific reference to Isocrates, but this is very improbable). The well-known sentiment of Ennius' Neoptolemus “philosophari est mihi necesse, at paucis; nam omnino haut placet. Degustandum ex ea, non in eam ingurgitandum censeo” (ap. Gell. Noct. Att. V 15. 9, 16. 5: cf. Cic. Tusc. Disp. II 1. 1 ff. al.) is probably translated from Euripides, but it admirably expresses the ordinary Roman view. See also on V 473 C, D.

ἀλλοκότους . They have, as we should say, ‘a twist.’

σὺ δέ γε is of course ironical, as σκώπτεις shews. Müller in his translation (p. 53) strangely misses this point.