αὐτήν
:
ipsam, not
eam, as Jowett apparently translates it.
διὸ δὴ καὶ εὐήθεις
. “For unstained thoughts do seldom dream on evil: Birds never limed no secret bushes fear” (
Rape of Lucrece). Cf. infra VII 517 D ff.,
Theaet. 174 C
ff. The use of
παραδείγματα recalls
Theaet. 176 E
, though the idea is somewhat different here. The word means ‘models,’ ‘standards,’ not ‘samples of experience’ (J. and C.), and
τοῖς πονηροῖς is equivalent to
τοῖς τῶν πονηρῶν παραδείγμασι. Cf. infra C, D, where
παράδειγμα τοῦ τοιούτου is ‘a model’ (not ‘a sample’) ‘of such a character.’ So also Schneider, who translates by ‘Vorbild.’
ὀψιμαθῆ κτλ.
The common taunt
ὀψιμαθής is in such a case an epithet of praise.
οὐκ οἰκείαν κτλ.
For the asyndeton see 407 D note
δεῖ αἰσθάνεσθαι for
διαισθάνεσθαι (Stob.
Flor. 45. 96) is ingenious, but weak. As Steinhart remarks (
Einleitung p. 173), the scientific knowledge of virtue, according to Socrates and Plato, implies a knowledge of its opposite, viz. vice: see on I 334 A, and cf. infra 409 D.
οἰόμενος
. Cf.
Theaet. 173 B
δεινοί τε καὶ σοφοὶ γεγονότες, ὡς οἴονται, and I 336 A note
καὶ πρεσβυτέροις κτλ.
The touching allusion to Socrates' condemnation will not escape the sympathetic reader. Plato seldom talks in this vein without thinking of his master: cf.
Theact. 174 C
and the still more affecting words in VII 517 A. It is from incidental references such as these that we can best appreciate the profound influence which the death of Socrates exercised upon Plato. See also VIII 560 D note
πονηρία μὲν γὰρ ‐‐ λήψεται
. See on 409 B and the suggestive remarks of Stewart on Aristotle's
Eth. Nic. V 1. 1129^{a} 17. Strictly speaking, Vice cannot have
scientific knowledge (
ἐπιστήμη) even of herselt, since Vice is ignorance (and scientific knowledge of Vice would imply a scientific knowledge of Virtue); but she recognises herself by
ἐμπειρία οἰκεία: cf. 409 B.
ἀρετὴ δὲ κτλ.
: ‘whereas Virtue will in course of time, if natural endowments are improved by education, attain to scientific knowledge at once of herself and Vice.’ The contrast between
πονηρία μέν and
ἀρετὴ δέ is much impaired if we connect
ἀρετή with
φύσεως (in the sense of ‘a virtuous nature’): and for this reason I now agree with Schneider in thinking
φύσεως παιδευομένης a genitive absolute. I formerly accepted Richards' emendation
παιδευομένη, which is decidedly more logical, if
φύσεως depends on
ἀρετή: but Schneider's view is better.
χρόνῳ belongs to
λήψεται, and not to
παιδευομένης (as if ‘educated by time,’ Jowett): mere lapse of time will never give
ἐπιστήμη. Cf.
ὀψιμαθῆ and
ἐν πολλῷ χρόνῳ διαισθάνεσθαι in 409 B.