κατὰ τοῦτο εἶναι.
εἶναιis redundant as in Isaeus,
περὶ τοῦ Μενεκλέους κλήρου , 32
ἡμεῖς ὠμόσαμεν εὖ ποιεῖν ἀλλήλους— κατὰ δύναμιν εἶναι, καὶ λόγῳ καὶ ἔργῳ , and in the common
ἑκὼν εἶναι : but no other instance of the precise phrase
κατὰ τοῦτο εἶναι is quoted.
οἵ γε πολλοὶ—οὐδὲν αἰσθάνονται
. Cf.
Gorg. 474A
τοὺς δὲ πολλοὺς ἐῶ χαίρειν, καὶ ἕνα ἐπιψηφίζειν ἐπίσταμαι, τοῖς δὲ πολλοῖς οὐδὲ διαλέγομαι. For
ὡς ἔπος εἰπεῖν (to be taken with
οὐδὲν ) see on
Apol. 17A
. The phrase is used to qualify the comprehension of a word or phrase, generally
οὐδείς or
πάντες .
τὸ οὖν—ἐπιχειρήματος
. B and T read
τὸν for
τό , by a natural error. Heindorf compares
Theaet. 144A
τὸ γὰρ εὐμαθῆ ὄντα—ρπᾷον αὖ εἶναι διαφεπόντως—ἐγὼ μὲν οὔτ’ ἂν ᾠόμην γενέσθαι κτλ.and
Rep. I. 331B
τὸ γὰρ μηδὲ ἄκοντά τινα ἐξαπατῆσαι—μέγα μέρος εἰς τοῦτο ἡ τῶν χρημάτων κτῆσις συμβάλλεται. Here
καὶ τοῦ ἐπιχειρήματος is a virtual repetition of
ἀποδιδράσκοντα : cf.
τὸν ταῦτα πράττοντα above in
316C
The sentence reminds one of the practice observed in Spartan education—to punish the youths not for stealing but for failing to escape with their booty: Xen.
Rep. Laced. 2. 8
εἴποι δ’ ἂν οὖν τις· τί δῆτα, εἴρεπ τὸ κλέρτειν ἀγαθὸν ἐνόμιζε, ρολλὰς ρληγὰς ἐρέβαλε τῷ ἁλισκομένῳ; ὅτι, φημὶ ἐγώ, καὶ τἄλλα, ὅσα ἄνθπωροι διδάσκουσι, κολάζουσι τὸν μὴ καλῶς ὑπηρετοῦντα : cf.
Rep. I. 361A
τὸν ἁλισκόμενον δὲ φαῦλον ἡγητέον.
τούτων τὴν ἐναντίαν ἅπασαν ὁδόν
. ‘h. e.
τὴν ὁδὸν ἣ ἅπασά ἐστιν ἐναντία τούτων . pro
τούτων eadem comparatione quae vocatur compendiaria dici potuit
τούτοις . Andocid. or. I. 4
ἐγὼ πολὺ τὴν ἐναντίαν τούτοις γνώμην ἔχω ’ (Kroschel). For
ἅπασαν with an adjective compare (with Kroschel) Xen.
Anab. I. 5. I
ἧν ἡ γῆ πεδίον ἅπαν ὁμαλὲς ὥσπερ θάλαττα and the common phrase
πᾶν τοὐναντίον .
σοφιστὴς εἶναι καὶ παιδεύειν ἀνθρώπους
. The
σοφιστὴς σοφίζει , i.e.
παιδεύει : see note on
312C
above.
Theaet. 167C (where Socrates is speaking for Protagoras)
ὁ σοφιστὴς τοὺς ραιδευομένους οὕτω δυνάμενος ραιδαγωγεῖν σοφός τε καὶ ἄξιος πολλῶν χρημάτων τοῖς παιδευθεῖσιν .
σὺν θεῷ εἰπεῖν
. ‘Crebra modestiae formula, bene explicat Steph.,
quod ita dico, ut in eo opem divinam agnoscam ’. Heindorf on
Theaet. 151B
καὶ σὺν θεῷ εἰπεῖν, πάνυ ἱκανῶς τοπάζω οἶς ἂν συγγενόμενοι ὄναιντο.
πολλά γε ἔτη ἤδη εἰμὶ ἐν τῇ τέχνῃ
.
Meno, 91E
οἶμαι γὰρ αὐτὸν(i.e.
Πρωταγόραν )
ἀποθανεῖν ἐγγὺς καὶ ἑβδομήκοντα ἔτη γεγονότα, τετταράκοντα δὲ ἐν τῇ τέχνῃ ὄντα . The phrases
εἶναι ἐν τῇ τέχνῃ, ἐν φιλοσοφίᾳ and the like are common.
οὐδενὸς ὅτου οὐ
. For the asyndeton Heindorf compares
Hom.
Od. XIV. 96
ἧ γάρ οἱ ζωή γ’ ἦν ἄσπετος· οὔ τινι τόσση ἀνδρῶν ἡρώων. The nearest parallel to
πάντων (which Cobet rejects) after
οὐδενὸς ὅτου οὐ seems to be in Dem.
adv. Lept. § 3
οὐ γὰρ ἔστιν ἐφ’ ὅτου τοῦτο οὐ πεπόνθατε τῶν πάντων (quoted by Heindorf).
ἁπάντων
goes with
τῶν ἔνδον ὄντων . It seems better to take
περὶ τούτων with
βούλεσθε than with
τὸν λόγον ποιεῖσθαι : otherwise it is hardly possible to separate
τούτων from
ἁπάντων .
ἐνδείξασθαι καὶ καλλωπίσασθαι—ὅτι ἐρασταί.
ὅτιdepends rather on
ἐνδείξασθαι than on
καλλωπίσασθαι : cf. below,
327A
ἐδίδασκε καὶ ἐπέπληττε τὸν μὴ καλῶς αὐλοῦντα , and
ibid. B
τῶν δικαίων καὶ τῶν νομίμων οὐδεὶς φθονεῖ οὐδ’ ἀποκρύπτεται ὥσπερ τῶν ἅλλων τεχνημάτων ,
Phaedo, 94D
τὰ μὲν ἀπειλοῦσα, τὰ δὲ νουθετοῦσα ταῖς ἐπιθυμίαις. See also notes on
327A
and
335E
below.
εἶμεν
. BT read
εἴημεν , but in Plato's time the short form of the optative plural is regular: see on
Apol. 22E
.
τί οὖν—οὐ—ἐκαλέσαμεν
. See above on
310A
and for
ἐπακούσωσιν note on
315A
καθεζόμενοι
. So T: B has
καθιζόμενοι , but presently in
317E
both MSS. read
συνεκαθεζόμεθα .
καὶ αὐτοὶ ἀντιλαβόμενοι
. This passage is difficult and different views are possible as to the construction and meaning. The MSS. read
καὶ αὐτοί τε . If the MSS. reading is retained,
τε must be regarded as answering to
δέ in
ἐν δὲ τούτῳ (cf.
Euthyphr. 3E), and
καὶ αὐτοί =
etiam ipsi, i.e. even without waiting for servants—a harsh explanation both for
καί and
αὐτοί . If
τε is left out (with most of the editors, following Heindorf),
καὶ αὐτοί means ‘ourselves also’ as opposed to Callias and Alcibiades in
ἐν δὲ τούτῳ Καλλίας τε καὶ Ἀλκιβιάδης . There is still a slight difficulty in contrasting
αὐτοί with these two, because they also would seem to be included in
αὐτοί (
πάντες ἡμεῖς—καὶ αὐτοί ), but such slight inaccuracies of expression are common in actual dialogue, which Plato's style is intended to imitate.
Καλλίας
. Hermann read
Κριτίας in order to escape the slight difficulty remarked on in the preceding note: ‘sed hospitis
erat Prodicum ut accederet invitare’ (Kroschel).
ἀναστήσαντες
: but
ἄγοντε just before.
Euthyd. 273B
offers an exact parallel (if we follow the reading of the Bodleian MS.):
ἰδόντες δὲ αὐτὸν ὅ τε Διονυσόδωρος καὶ ὁ Εὐθύδημος πρῶτον μὲν ἐριστάντε διελεγέσθην ἀλλήλοιν, ἄλλην καὶ ἄλλην ἀροβλέροντες εἰς ἡμᾶς : cf.
ibid. 273A
εἰσελθόντες—περιεπατείτην and D
ἐγελασάτην γοῦν ἄμφω βλέψαντες εἰς ἀλλήλους . The dual in Plato as in Greek generally is apt to sink into the plural.