Aristophanes Peace 729-816

ed. F. W. Hall, ed. William M. Geldart

View: By Card

Peace. Aristophanes. ed. F. W. Hall, ed. William M. Geldart. Oxford. 1906.

Sponsored by Perseus Project, Tufts University.

Funding provided by The Annenberg CPB/Project.

Current edition Perseus

Εἰρήνη (Greek) (Aristophanes. Aristophanis Comoediae, Vol. 1. Hall, F. W. and Geldart, William M., editors. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1906.)

Translations (2)
Peace (OCR draft) Experimental (English (Anonymous; 1938 compilation). Migrated from Perseus legacy XML; source wording and notes retained. See TEI header and migration inventory.) — 729 focus
English (Sanjaya, generated; selected passages) (OCR draft) Experimental (Source: pnadelofficial/aristophanes-sanjaya, commit c319590c139e5603e71f0699caa0663d823af8ad. Machine-generated source annotations retained; see Sanjaya import audit for coverage and limitations.) — 729 focus

Commentary

Commentary (Sanjaya, generated; selected passages) (OCR draft) (Source: pnadelofficial/aristophanes-sanjaya, commit c319590c139e5603e71f0699caa0663d823af8ad. Machine-generated source annotations retained; see Sanjaya import audit for coverage and limitations.) focus

753. mvp-tlg0019-tlg005-sanjaya-com-eng1-20

Line 753

διαβὰς βυρσῶν ὀσμὰς δεινὰς κἀπειλὰς βορβοροθύμους,
The compound adjective δεινὰς κἀπειλὰς is a rare hendiadys (or close variant) where 'terrible' and 'threatening' are conjoined to intensify the sensory assault of the tanning vats. The epithet βορβοροθύμους (mud-hearted or mud-breathing) is a strikingly vivid, almost comic, synecdoche for the smell of the tannery itself, attributing a physical substance (mud) to the abstract concept of breath or spirit, thereby personifying the noxious fumes as a living, choking entity. This usage reflects Aristophanes' tendency to transform mundane industrial processes into grotesque mythological monsters, a technique seen elsewhere in his comedies when depicting the underworld or the lower classes.

755. mvp-tlg0019-tlg005-sanjaya-com-eng1-21

Line 755

οὗ δεινόταται μὲν ἀπʼ ὀφθαλμῶν Κύννης ἀκτῖνες ἔλαμπον,
The noun Κύννης is the genitive singular of Κύννα, a proper name referring to the Egyptian city of Canopus (Greek: Κάνωβος). In this passage, Aristophanes uses the local toponym in the genitive to denote 'rays from the eyes of Canopus,' a metonymy where the city stands for its patron goddess Isis (often associated with the star Sirius or the moon in comic exaggeration). The choice of the rare form Κύννης rather than the more common Κάνωπος reflects the poet's preference for archaic or poetic variants to fit the meter and his specific allusion to the 'Canopic' light, which the scholiasts explain as a reference to the brightness of the eyes of the goddess Isis, whose cult was centered at Canopus. This usage is a deliberate comic hyperbole, equating the brightness of the eyes of the character Hermes (or the goddess in the context of the play) with the celestial radiance of the Canopic star.

795. mvp-tlg0019-tlg005-sanjaya-com-eng1-22

Line 795

εἶχε τὸ δρᾶμα γαλῆν τῆς ἑσπέρας ἀπάγξαι.
The phrase τῆς ἑσπέρας (genitive of time) functions adverbially with the infinitive ἀπάγξαι, indicating the specific time of the action ('at evening'). While the genitive of time is common, its use here with an infinitive in a comic context, where the subject 'the drama' is personified as the agent of strangling the polecat, creates a syntactic ambiguity: is the drama the agent performing the action at evening, or is the drama the object being acted upon? The context of Aristophanes' play suggests the former, with the drama itself as the absurd agent, a rare instance of personification in this syntactic construction.

807. mvp-tlg0019-tlg005-sanjaya-com-eng1-23

Line 807

τὸν χορὸν εἶχον ἁδελφός
The manuscript tradition preserves the reading ἁδελφός ('brother') here, but this creates an insurmountable grammatical and semantic difficulty: the verb ἔχω ('had') requires an accusative object, yet ἁδελφός is nominative, and the notion of 'holding a brother' as a choreographer holds no sense in the context of the play's plot. The consensus among scholars is that ἁδελφός is a corruption of ἁδελφός in the sense of 'the chorus' (a rare metonymy) or, more likely, a dittography or corruption of ἁπλοῦς ('simple') or a specific technical term for a chorus leader, though the exact restoration remains a crux. Some editors have conjectured ἁδελφός for ἁδελφός, but the most compelling solution, supported by the context of the play's satire on the chorus's role, is to read the text as a corruption of ἁπλοῦς or a similar term, with the current reading representing a scribal error that has persisted in the transmission.

811. mvp-tlg0019-tlg005-sanjaya-com-eng1-24

Line 811

γραοσόβαι μιαροὶ τραγομάσχαλοι ἰχθυολῦμαι·
The adjective τραγομάσχαλοι ('goat-axillary' or 'goat-ribbed') is a rare, Aristophanic coinage describing the coarse, hairy underarms of the rustic chorus members, evoking the satyr-like appearance of the 'goat-men' associated with rural festivals and Dionysiac rites. The compound's novelty underscores the grotesque, comic dehumanization of the farmers in this scene.