Iliad. . Germany. 2014.
Sponsored by University of Leipzig.
Funding provided by European Social Fund Saxony.
Iliad. . Germany. 2014.
Sponsored by University of Leipzig.
Funding provided by European Social Fund Saxony.
English (Thomas Hobbes, 1667, ed. Molesworth 1843) (OCR draft) (English) (English (Thomas Hobbes, 1667, ed. Molesworth 1843))
Provisional text from uncorrected OCR; expect errors.
analysis of (the location of) the river Keladon
analysis of the location of Pylos/battle between Pylos and Arcadia in Nestor’s story in Iliad 7 and its reworking to locate Pylos in Elis (as opposed to Messenia)
analysis of the location of Pylos/battle between Pylos and Arcadia in Nestor’s story and its reworking to locate Pylos in Elis (as opposed to Messenia), and here in particular the theory of Visser 1997 (and others) to explain the passage
analysis of the location of Pylos/battle between Pylos and Arcadia in Nestor’s story and its reworking to locate Pylos in Elis (as opposed to Messenia)
analysis of the reference to the river Iardanos and its location, and the variant versions of I.07.133-135 known to Strabo and Didymus
analysis of the location of Pylos/battle between Pylos and Arcadia in Nestor’s story and its reworking to locate Pylos in Elis (as opposed to Messenia)
analysis of mētis and the phrase “began to weave mētis,” used of Nestor (as here), as implying deception
Up to now, Diomedes has been the hero who comes closest to Achilles in competing for the title ‘best of the Achaeans’. Here in Rhapsody 7, however, the focus shifts to Ajax, who responds to the challenge of Hector to fight in a duel the one hero among all the Achaeans who is truly the ‘best of the Achaeans’. As we know from the overall references to Ajax in both the Iliad and the Odyssey, this hero is considered to be the second-best of the Achaeans in both epics. So, it does not bode well for Hector that, in his duel with Ajax, he cannot succeed beyond fighting such a hero to a draw. If Hector can do no better than fight to a draw the second-best of the Achaeans, he is surely doomed when the time comes for him to face the very best of the Achaeans in Rhapsody 22.
Hector and Ajax separated by heralds, pen and ink drawing by John Flaxman, 1790’s Victoria and Albert Museum
Whoever is ‘best of the Achaeans’ is challenged by Hector to fight him in a one-on-one duel. Hector boasts that he will kill this fighter, still to be named, who will then be entombed inside a sēma ‘tomb’ overlooking the Hellespont, I.07.086, and thus Hector will have a kleos ‘glory’ that is eternal, I.07.091. The irony here is that the fighter still to be named will be the winner of a future duel with Hector. That fighter will be Achilles, and the eternal kleos ‘glory’ will be primarily his. On the other hand, Hector’s wording is on the mark when he says at I.07.086 that the hero who is ‘best of the Achaeans’ will be entombed inside a sēma ‘tomb’ overlooking the Hellespont. And that hero will be Achilles.
As noted in the previous comment, the tomb of the hero whom Hector imagines he will kill is the tomb of Achilles, who in fact will kill Hector before he dies his own death. For details about the funeral and entombment of Achilles see the comment on I.16.456–457, with special reference to the word tarkhuein ‘ritually prepare’, as attested here at I.07.085.
The memorial language imagined here in the wording of Hector corresponds to the formulaic language of poetry written down on stone in the form of epigrams. So, Homeric diction shows here an awarenes of the genre of epigrammatic poetry. But this genre needed the technology of writing only for the sake of recording a given epigrammatic poem, not for the sake of actually composing it. Therefore, the awareness of epigrammatic language in Homeric diction does not require us to think that the technology of writing was needed for either the composition or the performance of Homeric poetry.
In Hector’s imagined scenario of an outcome for his duel with a hero who is the ‘best of the Achaeans’, that hero, whom he will kill, is pictured as ‘striving to be the best’, as expressed by the verb aristeuein, I.07.090. The corresponding noun, not attested in Homeric diction, is aristeiā ‘epic high point’, on which see the comment on I.05.103.
The Achaeans, faced with Hector’s challenge, hesitate, I.07.092–093. Their hesitation seems to indicate that not one of them is really the ‘best of the Achaeans’. Finally, Menelaos is first to volunteer for a one-on-one duel with Hector, I.07.094–103. An absence of volunteers, Menelaos knows, would be aklees ‘a thing without glory [kleos]’, I.07.100. It seems of course fitting for him to be the first, since his grievance against the Trojans over the abduction of Helen is primary, but the problem is that all the Achaean chieftains are aware of his inferiority to Hector, I.07.106, and so, fearing for his life, they restrain him from arming himself for a duel. Even the Master Narrator says outright that Hector was superior to Menelaos, I.07.104–105. Then Nestor goads the chieftains to take up the challenge of Hector, I.07.123–161, and his goading now prompts nine of these chieftains to volunteer, I.07.161–169: they are Agamemnon, Diomedes, the two Ajaxes, Idomeneus and Meriones, Eurypylos, Thoas, and Odysseus. It is significant that Nestor’s words refer to these nine chieftains as aristēes Panakhaiōn, I.07.159. For a translation of this expression, the singular form aristeus of plural aristēes first needs to be correlated with the verb aristeuein, which can be translated as ‘strive to be the best, to be aristos’, as at Ι.06.208 and I.11.784. In the second of these two passages, I find it most significant that the referent is Achilles himself. An aristeus, then, is a man who strives to be the best, aristos. Correspondingly, the expression aristēes Panakhaiōn at I.07.159 must refer to ‘men who strive to be the best of all the Achaeans’.
While volunteering to accept the challenge of Hector, Menelaos blames the other Achaean chieftains for hesitating. He engages them in ‘quarrel’, neikos, and ‘he says words of insult’, oneidizein.
In the immediate context, only the surface meaning of therapontes as ‘attendants’ is evident.
Not only Menelaos but Nestor too blames the other Achaean chieftains for hesitating. He goads them into action not only by blaming them but also by telling a story about one of his past successes as a warrior.
Nestor’s story of his fight with Ereuthalion amounts to a lesson about strategy in warfare. A pivotal figure in the story is the predecessor of Ereuthalion: he is Arēi-thoos, at I.07.137 and again at I.07.138, whose name is a combination of themes involving the god Ares and a primary characteristic of Ares: this god runs with the speed of wind, as conveyed by the adjective thoós ‘running, swift’, derived from the verb theein ‘run’.
See the comment at I.02.401.
In the immediate context, only the surface meaning of therapōn as ‘attendant’ is evident.
By goading the Achaeans, Nestor is engaged in the act of neikeîn: so he ‘quarrels with’ the Achaeans. This way, he engages in the language of blame as opposed to praise. And, even before Nestor starts blaming the Achaeans, Menelaos has already engaged in his own act of neikos ‘quarrel’, I.07.095.
The field of nine Achaeans competing for the title of ‘best of the Achaeans’ in response to Hector’s challenge and to Nestor’s reproach is now narrowed down to three: Ajax, Diomedes, and Agamemnon.
Ajax boasts that he is superior to other Achaeans both by way of biē ‘force, violence, strength’, I.07.197, and by way of idreiē ‘intelligence’, I.07.198. In Homeric diction, a synonym for the second of these two words would be mētis ‘mind, intelligence’.
The role of Zeus in awarding nīkē ‘victory’ to the Achaeans is primary, while the corresponding role of Athena is only secondary.
Even Hector acknowledges the superior status of Ajax among the Achaeans: Ajax excels in biē ‘force, violence, strength’, I.07.288, and in pinutē ‘intelligence, I.07.289. In Homeric diction, a synonym for the second of these two words would be mētis ‘mind, intelligence’.
Hector seems to be saying that the Trojan women ‘pray’ to him, as expressed by the verb eukhesthai. This turn of phrase may point to the status of Hector as cult hero beyond his epic existence.
The theme of awarding the choice cut of meat to the foremost warrior in the context of a dais ‘feast, division’ continues to accentuate what is missing in this picture, which is the fact that Achilles lost his equitable share at the beginning of the Iliad.
The choice of the word mētis ‘mind, intelligence’ in the sense of ‘plan’ here is relevant to the undercurrent of an opposition between this word and the word biē ‘force, violence, strength’. The opposition of mētis and biē corresponds to a potential antagonism between Odysseus and Achilles.
analysis of the location of Pylos/battle between Pylos and Arcadia in Nestor’s story and its reworking to locate Pylos in Elis (as opposed to Messenia)
analysis of the reference to the river Iardanos and its location, and the variant versions of I.07.133-135 known to Strabo and Didymus
in a list of passages exemplifying the complementary metrical distribution of eukhos and kudos
in a list of examples of directly quoted prayers not concluded by formula (A)
analysis of the phraseological correspondence between the two ‘modes’ of ritual narrative sub-genre, ritual prescription and ritual description, with I.07.194 and 200 as examples
I.07.194 as the only instance in Section II (= eukh—˘, under eukhesthai + dative) of deviation from the inflection eukhonto and I.07.200 as filling the prescription
in a list of examples of eukhesthai + dative
switch from Dii patri to Dii t’alloisin te theoisin attested with a variation of the || (short OR two shorts) euxamenos Dii patri # formula which uses epeukhesthai instead of eukhesthai, in the context of analyzing Allen’s text at I.08.526 vs. Zenodotus’s version of the verse
analysis of the phraseological correspondence between the two ‘modes’ of ritual narrative sub-genre, ritual prescription and ritual description, with I.07.194 and 200 as examples
in a list of examples of eukhesthai + dative
I.07.194 as the only instance in Section II (= eukh—˘, under eukhesthai + dative) of deviation from the inflection eukhonto and I.07.200 as filling the prescription
comparison of eukhos and kudos, and here specifically analysis of the phraseology surrounding them that is paralleled by only kleos
examples of the identical context in which eukhos and kudos occur
in a list of examples of directly quoted prayers not concluded by formula (A)
in a list of attestations of eukhesthai + dative in sacral contexts, in the subcategory of anomalous attestations (isolated metrical position of eukhesthai)
the only place in Homer where a dative after eukhesthai is not a god/a collection of gods, and argument that this usage promotes Hektor from man to ‘god’
anomaly of the formula in this verse, namely, the complement to eukhomai is not a noun (e.g. name of divinity) but a pronoun
The duel of Hektor and Ajax would have continued if not for the intervention of the heralds, one of whom, the Trojan Idaios, "said a muthos" (eipe te muthon, 7.277). Ajax replies: "Bid Hektor to speak these things (muthēsasthai). For he himself challenged all the best to battle. Let him take the lead" (7.284-86). Hektor then pronounces the end of the duel (7.290-93): "Let us cease from battle and strife."
Because Homeric poetry so keenly attends to socially correct forms of speech, Hektor's words are more than a simple directive: they represent an actual "performative utterance"—language that brings about a desired end by virtue of the very pronouncement. There are "felicity conditions" for performative utterances, and the poem respects just such parameters: to be linguistically correct, Hektor, who began the duel with the challenge, must "pronounce" its end. Ajax, with a good sense of propriety that marks the most successful Homeric warriors, defers to his opponent. Idaios has an exact analogue in the religious or legal official who instructs the groom to say "I thee wed." (Martin 1993:40).
Nestor's speech at 7.124-60 illustrates his strategy of thickly layered memory. He begins with his characteristic expression of dismay—"A great sorrow has come to Akhaia. Peleus, the honored horse-driver, would groan"—a phrase that reuses the strategy of his first speech in the poem (1.245-46). He recalls three separate items: Peleus once questioned him about Argive genealogy (7.127-28); he wishes he were young as when he fought the Arkadians (7.133-57); and embedded in the latter ring-composition is a third memory, the heritage of the armor of Ereuthalion, whom he defeated long ago. The importance of armor as a signifier of heroism in the poem (consider Achilles' equipment) and the relevance of genealogical lore place this narrative sign in a wider context. All three memories are set in terms appropriate to flyting as the speech ends: "Thus did Nestor make a neikos" (7.161). It becomes clear that he has used himself as foil to shame the Achaeans into volunteering for the duel (Martin 1993:82-83).
For the broader analysis of Nestor as master of the memory genre, see the comment on Iliad 1.259-274.
Martin, R. P. 1993. The Language of Heroes: Speech and Performance in the Iliad. Ithaca.
Two more times Hektor practices eulogistic dramatization, when he sets the terms for his single combat with an Achaean and when he calls a formal halt to the duel. Again he uses the figure of his addressee as the starting point for a quotation that ultimately returns praise to himself: if he kills his enemy, in future time someone sailing past the man's burial mound at the Hellespont will say, "This is the marker of a man who died long ago, whom once shining Hektor slew as he was excelling" (7.89-90). In this imagined eulogy, which echoes the diction of attested epitaphs, the dead hero remains nameless, obliterated by Hektor's reputation (Martin 1993:136-37).
Hektor's strategy must be contrasted with that of Diomedes in the Book 6 scene: if Diomedes has fabricated a past, Hektor fictionalizes a future, and then, just as Diomedes had, makes the fiction affect the present. His suggestion of an exchange of gifts "in order that someone of both Achaeans and Trojans may say 'They fought over spirit-devouring strife, then in amity joined they parted'" (7.301-2) presents us not with a portrait of the developing hero but with a man already living in the poetic tradition that is to overtake him (Martin 1993:137).
For Hektor's distinctive quotation strategy and its psychological consistency, see the comment on Iliad 6.459-461.
Martin, R. P. 1993. The Language of Heroes: Speech and Performance in the Iliad. Ithaca.
A remarkable testimony by Hektor himself about his ability as a performer comes when Ajax challenges him to fight the "best of the Achaeans" after Achilles (7.235-41): "Do not try me like a simple child, or a woman, who does not know war-work. / I know well fights and man-slayings, / I know to the right, I know to the left how to move my ox-hide shield / that I own for warring. / I know how to leap into the moil of swift horses, / I know how to dance to hostile Ares in the close fighting." The convergence of fighting and dancing in Hektor's words puts the two activities on the same level of stylized action. The mention of the performance theme by Hektor is itself a well-crafted musical performance, "an old, pre-epic lyric sword-dance song." The anaphora of "I know" (oida, lines 237, 238, 240, 241) marks off metrical cola that strongly resemble later-attested Greek lyric metrical segments (Martin 1993:132-33).
But the concentration on his own performance is like that of the dancer so concerned with the criticism of the audience that he or she limits expressiveness by paying too much attention to footwork. Hektor's style in commanding is remarkable for its inwardness: he orders primarily himself. No other speaker makes explicit so consistently the next moves he intends to make (Martin 1993:133-34).
For Hektor's distinctive quotation strategy in the memory genre, see the comment on Iliad 6.459-461.
Martin, R. P. 1993. The Language of Heroes: Speech and Performance in the Iliad. Ithaca.