mvp-comment-100-1
ποθεῖ, ποθῶν δ’
1
mvp-comment-101-1
ἔτι μέγας οὐρανῷ
2
ἐν
3
mvp-comment-102-1
τὸν ὑπεραλγῆ
4
mvp-comment-102-2
νέμουσα
5
mvp-comment-103-1
μήτε ὑπεράχθεο
6
οἷς
7
mvp-comment-104-1
εὐμαρὴς θεός
8
θεός
9
mvp-comment-105-1
οὔτε γὰρ
10
mvp-comment-105-2
Κρῖσαν
11
mvp-comment-105-3
Crisa stood about two miles W.S.W. of Delphi, on a spur of Parnassus, at the lower outlet of the gorge through which the river Pleistus issues into the plain. The
Iliad mentions ‘sacred Crisa’ (
ζαθέην
, 2. 520). But the Homeric Hymn to the Pythian Apollo is the best witness to its ancient power. There, just as here, the name
Κρῖσα
includes the land which stretches southward from the town to its harbour on the ‘wide gulf’ (vv. 253— 261). We need not, then, read
Κρίσᾳ
or
Κρίσας
. Crisa was the earliest seat of trade on the western sea; Delphi, when first founded, was merely a sanctuary in its territory. Pindar recalls the old prominence of its name when he describes a Pythian victory as won
Κρισαίαις ἐνὶ πτυχαῖς
(
P. 6. 18).
mvp-comment-105-4
Cirrha, a town of much later date, was the port of Crisa on the gulf. About 585 B.C., the Delphians, aided by Cleisthenes of Sicyon and his allies, succeeded, after a long struggle, in humbling Crisa and destroying Cirrha. The Crisaean plain was then devoted to Apollo, whose domain was thus extended from his temple to the coast. When Sophocles wrote, that ground was still a
βούνομος ἀκτή
, inviolable by plough or spade. It was not till the middle of the next century that the alleged encroachments of Amphissa on the
ἱερὰ χώρα
gave a pretext for war to the Amphictyons (355 B.C.).
mvp-comment-105-5
Ulrichs (
Reisen in Griechenland) was the first to place the relations of Crisa and Cirrha in a clear light. Strabo correctly describes the site of Cirrha, but erroneously places Crisa to the east of it (9. p. 418).
mvp-comment-106-1
βούνομον
12
βουνόμον
13
mvp-comment-106-2
βούνομον ἀκτὰν
14
Κρῖσαν
15
mvp-comment-107-1
ἀπερίτροπος
16
mvp-comment-108-1
παρὰ τὸν Ἀχέροντα
17
ἀνάσσων
18
θεὸς
19
mvp-comment-109-1
μὲν
20
mvp-comment-109-2
ὁ πολὺς … βίοτος
21
mvp-comment-109-3
ἀνέλπιστος
22
mvp-comment-109-4
187 *
τεκέων
. I am now satisfied that this is a true correction of
τοκέων
23
ἅτις
24
τοκέων
25
mvp-comment-110-1
ἁπερεί
26
mvp-comment-110-2
ἔποικος
27
mvp-comment-111-1
οἰκονομῶ θαλάμους
28
mvp-comment-112-1
ἀεικεῖ σὺν στολᾷ
29
mvp-comment-113-1
κεναῖς δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
30
ἀμφίσταμαι
31
mvp-comment-113-2
Hartung, reading
κενὰ δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
, takes the sense to be that she stands ‘hungry’ by the tables at which the others feast. But
κενή
as=
νῆστις
would be neither usual nor elegant.
mvp-comment-114-1
Hitherto the Chorus have offered consolation or counsel. At v. 213 they return to that strain. But here, moved by Electra's misery, they join with her in bewailing its cause.
mvp-comment-114-2
οἰκτρὰ μὲν … πλαγά
32
κοίταις
33
οἰκτρὰ … αὐδὰ
34
mvp-comment-114-3
Sophocles, who follows the Homeric story as to the banquet, could not but remember the
οἰκτροτάτην ὄπα
of the dying Cassandra. And this might naturally suggest to him that other
οἰκτρὰ αὐδή
which she had uttered at an earlier moment, immediately after Agamemnon's return,—her presage of his fate, and her own:
Aesch.
Ag. 1072
—1314.
mvp-comment-114-4
The sense then is:—‘There was a voice of lamentation at the return from Troy’; alluding especially to Cassandra's laments, but also, perhaps, to forebodings in the mouth of the people at Mycenae. ‘And there was a voice of lamentation
ἐν κοίταις πατρῴαις
, when thy father lay on the couch at the fatal banquet.’ The ‘voice’ at the banquet is, first, that of the dying Agamemnon; but Sophocles may have thought also of Cassandra's death-cry, which was sounding in the king's ears as he fell.—For other interpretations, see Appendix.
mvp-comment-114-5
νόστοις
35
ἐν
36
mvp-comment-114-6
κοίταις
37
mvp-comment-114-7
ὅτε οἱ
38
σοι
39
ἀνταία
40
mvp-comment-114-8
γενύων
41
mvp-comment-115-1
δόλος … ἔρος
42
mvp-comment-116-1
δεινὰν δεινῶς
43
δεινὰν … μορφάν
44
mvp-comment-116-2
εἴτ’ οὖν … εἴτε
45
βροτῶν
46
mvp-comment-117-1
πλέον … ἐχθίστα
47
mvp-comment-117-2
δὴ
48
mvp-comment-118-1
νὺξ
49
mvp-comment-118-2
δείπνων
50
mvp-comment-119-1
ἄχθη
51
τοῖς
52
θανάτους
53
mvp-comment-119-2
διδύμαιν χειροῖν
54
διδύμοιν
55
mvp-comment-120-1
εἷλον … πρόδοτον
56
mvp-comment-121-1
οἷς
57
mvp-comment-121-2
Ὀλύμπιος
58
mvp-comment-122-1
ποίνιμα
59
mvp-comment-123-1
ἀγλαΐας
60
mvp-comment-123-2
ἀποναίατο
61
mvp-comment-124-1
πόρσω
62
mvp-comment-125-1
γνώμαν ἴσχεις
63
mvp-comment-125-2
ἐξ οἵων
64
mvp-comment-125-3
τὰ παρόντ’
65
mvp-comment-125-4
οἰκείας
66
mvp-comment-126-1
πολύ … τι κακῶν
67
mvp-comment-126-2
ὑπερεκτήσω
68
mvp-comment-127-1
τὰ δὲ
69
οὐκ ἐριστὰ τοῖς δυνατοῖς
70
πλάθειν
71
mvp-comment-127-2
ἐριστά
72
mvp-comment-127-3
πλάθειν
73
mvp-comment-128-1
δεινοῖς ἠναγκάσθην
74
mvp-comment-129-1
ὀργά
75
ἔξοιδ’
76
mvp-comment-130-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
77
mvp-comment-130-2
ἐν … δεινοῖς
78
mvp-comment-130-3
σχήσω
79
mvp-comment-130-4
ταύτας ἄτας
80
mvp-comment-131-1
ὄφρα
81
mvp-comment-131-2
βίος ἔχῃ με
82
σχήσω
83
mvp-comment-132-1
τίνι γάρ … τίνι φρονοῦντι καίρια
84
ἀκούσαιμ’ ἂν πρόσφορον ἔπος
85
τίνι
86
πρόσφορον
87
mvp-comment-132-2
Other explanations are:—(1) Taking the dative with
πρόσφορον
:—‘To what person who feels aright would that word be suitable which I should hear (=which would be said of me)?’ That is: Should I not deserve to incur a censure from which every right-minded person would shrink? Should I not deserve to be called
δυσσεβής
? This seems forced; and it does not well suit
ἔπος
. (2) Taking the dative with
ἀκούσαιμι
:—‘At whose mouth (=
from whom), that thinks aright, could I hear a suitable word of comfort?’ But such a dative seems impossible. In
Il. 16. 515
δύνασαι δὲ σὺ πάντοσ’ ἀκούειν
|
ἀνέρι κηδομένῳ
, the dat. is one of interest, denoting the person whose prayer is heard (‘
for him’); cp.
Il. 5. 115
κλῦθί μοι
: 24. 335
ἔκλυες ᾧ κ’ ἐθέλῃσθα
.
mvp-comment-133-1
ἄνετε
88
mvp-comment-133-2
ἄλυτα
89
mvp-comment-133-3
κεκλήσεται
90
mvp-comment-133-4
231 f. For
ἐκ
91
mvp-comment-133-5
ἀνάριθμος
92
θρήνων
93
mvp-comment-134-1
ἀλλ’ οὖν
94
γε
95
εὐνοίᾳ
96
mvp-comment-135-1
μάτηρ ὡσεί τις
97
mvp-comment-136-1
μὴ τίκτειν
98
mvp-comment-136-2
ἄταν ἄταις
99
mvp-comment-137-1
καὶ τί μέτρον
100
κακότατος
101
mvp-comment-137-2
φέρε
102
mvp-comment-137-3
ἐπὶ τοῖς φθ.
103
mvp-comment-138-1
ἔβλαστ’
104
mvp-comment-139-1
τούτοις
105
mvp-comment-140-1
εἴ τῳ πρόσκειμαι χρηστῷ
106
mvp-comment-141-1
ξυνναίοιμ’
107
mvp-comment-141-2
εὔκηλος
108
mvp-comment-141-3
γονέων
109
ἐκτίμους
110
mvp-comment-141-4
ἐκτίμους ἵσχουσα
111
mvp-comment-141-5
πτέρυγας … γόων
112
mvp-comment-141-6
ὀξυτόνων
113
mvp-comment-142-1
εἰ γὰρ
114
mvp-comment-142-2
γᾶ
115
mvp-comment-142-3
οὐδὲν
116
ὢν
117
εἰ
118
mvp-comment-142-4
Electra is contrasting her father, whose earthly life has been cut short, with his murderers, who survive. But she believes that his spirit lives in the world below, and will be active in aiding the vengeance (453 ff.).
mvp-comment-142-5
πάλιν
119
mvp-comment-142-6
ἀντιφόνους δίκας
120
mvp-comment-143-1
ἔρροι τ’
121
mvp-comment-143-2
αἰδὼς
122
εὐσέβεια
123
mvp-comment-144-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
124
mvp-comment-144-2
καὶ
125
τὸ σὸν … καὶ τοὐμὸν
126
mvp-comment-145-1
νίκα
127
mvp-comment-145-2
ἅμα
128
mvp-comment-146-1
πολλοῖσι θρήνοις
129
mvp-comment-147-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
130
mvp-comment-148-1
ἥτις εὐγενὴς γυνή
131
mvp-comment-149-1
πατρῷα … πήματα
132
mvp-comment-150-1
κατ’ εὐφρόνην
133
mvp-comment-150-2
θάλλοντα
134
mvp-comment-151-1
ᾗ
135
mvp-comment-151-2
πρῶτα μὲν … εἶτα … ἔπειτα
136
ᾗ
137
mvp-comment-151-3
τὰ μητρὸς
138
mvp-comment-151-4
ἔχθιστα συμβέβηκεν
139
mvp-comment-152-1
κἀκ τῶνδ’ ἄρχομαι
140
mvp-comment-153-1
λαβεῖν … τὸ τητᾶσθαι
141
mvp-comment-154-1
ποίας
142
δοκεῖς
143
mvp-comment-155-1
ἴδω
144
εἰσίδω δ’
145
ἴδω δὲ
146
mvp-comment-155-2
μὲν
147
mvp-comment-156-1
ἐσθήματα
148
mvp-comment-156-2
ἐκείνῳ
149
mvp-comment-156-3
παρεστίους … λοιβάς
150
ἔνθ’ ἐκεῖνον ὤλεσεν
151
mvp-comment-156-4
Acc. to
Homer. Hymn. 29. 4 ff., feasts began and ended with libations to Hestia:
οὐ γὰρ ἄτερ σοῦ
|
εἰλαπίναι θνητοῖσιν, ἵν’ οὐ πρώτῃ πυμάτῃ τε
|
Ἱστίῃ ἀρχόμενος σπένδει μελιηδέα οἶνον
. Soph. fr. 658
<*> πρῷρα λοιβῆς Ἑστία
. Other divinities, including Zeus
σωτήρ
, were similarly honoured; then the paean was sung, and the
πότος
began ( Plat.
Symp.p. 176 A).
mvp-comment-157-1
τούτων
152
mvp-comment-158-1
αὐτοέντην
153
mvp-comment-158-2
Brunck first adopted
αὐτοέντην
154
αὐτοφόντην
155
mvp-comment-158-3
ἡμὶν
156
mvp-comment-159-1
ταλαίνῃ
157
mvp-comment-160-1
ταύτην … τῷδε
158
mvp-comment-161-1
μιάστορι
159
Ἐρινὺν
160
mvp-comment-162-1
ἐγγελῶσα τοῖς ποιουμένοις
161
mvp-comment-163-1
εὑροῦς’
162
τότε
163
mvp-comment-163-2
The conjecture
φρουροῦς’
164
τηροῦς’
165
mvp-comment-164-1
χοροὺς ἵστησι
166
mvp-comment-164-2
μηλοσφαγεῖ … ἱερὰ
167
mvp-comment-164-3
ἔμμην’ ἱερά
168
mvp-comment-164-4
τοῖς σωτηρίοις
169
mvp-comment-164-5
Argive tradition placed Agamemnon's death on the 13th of Gamelion (about the end of January). So said ‘the Argive historians’ (
οἱ Ἀργολικοὶ συγγραφεῖς
),— according to an Argive writer named Deinias, who lived about 225 B.C. (Schol. here: Müller,
Frag. Hist. vol. III. p. 25.) Possibly, then, the idea of Clytaemnestra's hideous festival may have been suggested to the poet by some actual commemoration of the event in Argolis. There was a cult of Agamemnon in various places,—notably in Laconia. (Cp. Roscher's
Lexicon, p. 96.)
mvp-comment-165-1
ἡ δύσμορος
170
κατὰ στέγας
171
mvp-comment-166-1
τέτηκα
172
mvp-comment-166-2
πατρὸς
173
mvp-comment-166-3
The
δαίς
is the feast which, in Homeric fashion (
Il. 1. 467
), would follow the sacrifice (281). Acc. to Eustathius p. 1507. 61 (on
Hom.
Od. 4. 524
ff.),
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαὶς
(or
τράπεζα
) was a proverb
ἐπὶ τῶν ἐπ’ ὀλέθρῳ εὐωχουμένων
. The poet may mean that Clytaemnestra called the festival
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαίς
, in direct allusion to
δεῖπνα ἄρρητα
(203): and this would give a special point to
ἐγγελῶσα
(277). Cp.
Eur.
Or. 1008
τά τ’ ἐπώνυμα δεῖπνα Θυέστου
. But the words do not necessarily imply more than that she called it
Ἀγαμεμνόνεια
.
mvp-comment-167-1
αὐτὴ πρὸς αὑτήν
174
αὑτήν
175
mvp-comment-167-2
κλαῦσαι
176
mvp-comment-167-3
ἡδονὴν φέρει
177
mvp-comment-168-1
ἡ λόγοισι γενναία
178
mvp-comment-169-1
φωνοῦσα
179
mvp-comment-170-1
δύσθεον
180
mvp-comment-170-2
μίσημα
181
mvp-comment-170-3
σοὶ μόνῃ
182
mvp-comment-170-4
τέθνηκεν
183
mvp-comment-170-5
ἐν πένθει
184
mvp-comment-171-1
ἐκ γόων
185
mvp-comment-171-2
οἱ κάτω θεοί
186
mvp-comment-172-1
τάδ’
187
mvp-comment-172-2
ἥξοντ’ Ὀρέστην
188
mvp-comment-173-1
παραστᾶς’
189
mvp-comment-174-1
ἥτις
190
mvp-comment-174-2
ὑπεξέθου
191
mvp-comment-175-1
ἀλλ’ ἴσθι τοι τείσουσά γ’
192
mvp-comment-176-1
ὑλακτεῖ
193
mvp-comment-176-2
σὺν
194
mvp-comment-176-3
πέλας
195
παρών
196
mvp-comment-176-4
301 The adv.
πάντα
197
mvp-comment-176-5
ἄναλκις
198
mvp-comment-176-6
ἡ πᾶσα βλάβη
199
mvp-comment-177-1
σὺν γυναιξὶ
200
mvp-comment-177-2
τὰς μάχας
201
mvp-comment-178-1
ἐφήξειν
202
mvp-comment-179-1
μέλλων … δρᾶν τι
203
mvp-comment-179-2
τὰς οὔσας τε … καὶ τὰς ἀπούσας
204
mvp-comment-179-3
μου
205
μοι
206
mvp-comment-179-4
διέφθορεν
207
mvp-comment-180-1
σωφρονεῖν
208
εὐσεβεῖν
209
mvp-comment-180-2
ἔν τοι κακοῖς
210
mvp-comment-180-3
πολλή )στ’ ἀνάγκη
211
κἀπιτηδεύειν κακά
212
mvp-comment-180-4
I place only a comma, not a colon, after
πάρεστιν
213
mvp-comment-181-1
ὄντος … βεβῶτος
214
mvp-comment-182-1
ἦ κάρτα
215
mvp-comment-182-2
θυραῖον
216
mvp-comment-182-3
οἰχνεῖν
217
mvp-comment-182-4
ἀγροῖσι
218
mvp-comment-182-5
τυγχάνει
219
mvp-comment-183-1
ἦ κἂν … ἱκοίμην
220
ἦ τ<*>ν
221
ἦ δἂν
222
mvp-comment-183-2
ἐς λόγους τοὺς σοὺς ἱκοίμην
223
mvp-comment-184-1
ὡς νῦν
224
ὥς νυν
225
mvp-comment-184-2
ἱστόρει· τί σοι φίλον
226
τό
227
τά
228
mvp-comment-184-3
With the other punctuation,
ἱστόρει τί σοι φίλον
229
mvp-comment-185-1
καὶ δὴ
230
mvp-comment-185-2
τοῦ κασιγνήτου τί φής
231
mvp-comment-185-3
ἥξοντος
232
ἢ μέλλοντος
233
mvp-comment-186-1
φησίν γε
234
mvp-comment-186-2
ποεῖ
235
mvp-comment-187-1
καὶ μὴν ἔγωγ’
236
γε
237
mvp-comment-187-2
οὐκ ὄκνῳ
238
mvp-comment-188-1
ἀρκεῖν
239
mvp-comment-189-1
ἐπεί
240
mvp-comment-189-2
μακρὰν
241
mvp-comment-189-3
324 Here, as in 316,
νῦν
242
νυν
243
mvp-comment-189-4
δόμων
244
φέρουσαν
245
mvp-comment-190-1
ὅμαιμον
246
mvp-comment-190-2
φύσιν
247
mvp-comment-191-1
Χρυσόθεμιν
248
mvp-comment-192-1
οἷα
249
νομίζεται
250
mvp-comment-193-1
πρὸς θυρῶνος ἐξόδοις
251
φωνεῖς
252
ἐλθοῦσα
253
αὖ
254
mvp-comment-193-2
330 For the absence of caesura, cp.
Ph. 101
n.
mvp-comment-194-1
θυμῷ … χαρίζεσθαι
255
mvp-comment-195-1
καίτοι τοσοῦτόν γ’ οἶδα
256
mvp-comment-195-2
κἀμαυτήν, ὅτι
257
mvp-comment-195-3
333 f. For the repeated
ἄν
258
mvp-comment-195-4
οἶ) αὐτοῖς φρονῶ
259
mvp-comment-196-1
ὑφειμένῃ
260
πλεῖν
261
mvp-comment-196-2
For the image, cp.
Eur.
Med. 524
ἄκροισι λαίφους κρασπέδοις
(with close-reefed sails)
ὑπεκφυγεῖν
|
τὴν σὴν στόμαργον, ὦ γύναι, γλωσσαλγίαν
:
Ar.
Ran. 997
ἀλλ’ ὅπως, ὦ γεννάδα
, |
μὴ πρὸς ὀργὴν ἀντιλέξεις
, |
ἀλλὰ συστείλας, ἄκροισι
|
χρώμενος τοῖς ἱστίοις κ.τ.λ.
: and conversely
Soph.
Ant. 715
ναὸς ὅστις ἐγκρατῆ πόδα
|
τείνας ὑπείκει μηδέν
.
Ovid
Epist. 1. 8. 71
moderatius opta, | Et voti, quaeso, contrahe vela tui.
Shakesp.
Henry VI., pt. iii, act 3 sc. 3. 5
‘Now Margaret | Must strike her sail, and learn awhile to serve | Where kings command.’
mvp-comment-197-1
καὶ μὴ δοκεῖν
262
mvp-comment-198-1
τοιαῦτα δ’ ἄλλα
263
ἀλλὰ
264
ἄλλα
265
mvp-comment-199-1
καίτοι τὸ μὲν δίκαιον
266
mvp-comment-199-2
κρίνεις
267
mvp-comment-199-3
εἰ … με δεῖ
268
mvp-comment-199-4
ἐλευθέραν
269
mvp-comment-199-5
ζῆν
270
mvp-comment-199-6
πάντ’
271
mvp-comment-199-7
ἀκουστέα
272
mvp-comment-200-1
δεινόν γε
273
mvp-comment-201-1
τῆς … τικτούσης
274
mvp-comment-201-2
μέλειν
275
mvp-comment-202-1
τἀμὰ νουθετήματα
276
mvp-comment-202-2
κείνης διδακτά
277
mvp-comment-202-3
ἐκ σαυτῆς
278
mvp-comment-203-1
The text, which has been suspected (cr. n.), is sound; but the train of thought is somewhat obscured by compression.
mvp-comment-203-2
‘You forget your father, and care only for your mother. All your counsels to me come from her. Then (
ἔπειτα
),—that being so,—give up the attempt at a compromise. Make a
choice (
ἑλοῦ γε
). You can be imprudent (
φρονεῖν κακῶς
),—as you say that I am,—and loyal to your dead father. Or you can be prudent (
φρονοῦσα
), and forgetful of him,—as you actually are; you who (
ἥτις
) say, indeed, that you would show your hatred of the murderers if you could; and yet, when I
do resist them, you try to turn me from my purpose. You merely add the shame of cowardice to our woes.’
mvp-comment-203-3
ἔπειθ’
279
mvp-comment-203-4
ἑλοῦ γε
280
mvp-comment-203-5
φρονεῖν κακῶς
281
mvp-comment-203-6
Other explanations are:—(1) ‘Choose to be thought either
lost to right feeling, or, if you have such feeling, then at least
forgetful of your duty.’ (2) ‘Choose to seem either
unintelligent (if you are merely the blind instrument of our rulers); or, if you act with clear understanding (
φρονοῦσα
),—thinking to benefit me,—at least forgetful of your father.’ Both these views assume that the question is merely between two interpretations which might be placed on the present conduct of Chrysothemis. But Electra is putting the dilemma between imprudent loyalty and prudent disloyalty.
mvp-comment-204-1
τῶν φίλων
282
mvp-comment-205-1
ἥτις
283
φρονοῦσα
284
μῖσος
285
mvp-comment-206-1
πάντα
286
mvp-comment-206-2
τιμωρουμένης
287
mvp-comment-207-1
οὔτε … τε
288
mvp-comment-207-2
τήν τε δρῶσαν
289
mvp-comment-208-1
πρὸς κακοῖσι
290
mvp-comment-208-2
δειλίαν ἔχει
291
mvp-comment-209-1
ἐπεὶ
292
mvp-comment-209-2
ἢ μάθ’ ἐξ ἐμοῦ
293
mvp-comment-210-1
ἐπαρκούντως
294
mvp-comment-211-1
προσάπτειν
295
mvp-comment-211-2
εἴ τις ἔστ’ ἐκεῖ χάρις
296
mvp-comment-212-1
ἡμὶν
297
ξύνει
298
mvp-comment-213-1
τὰ σὰ … δῶῤ
299
mvp-comment-213-2
ἐφ’ οἶσι
300
mvp-comment-213-3
χλιδᾷς
301
mvp-comment-214-1
ὑπεικάθοιμι
302
mvp-comment-214-2
πλουσία
303
mvp-comment-214-3
περιρρείτω
304
mvp-comment-215-1
τοὐμὲ μὴ λυπεῖν
305
mvp-comment-215-2
Remark the resemblance to the passage where Antigone—summing up her position—compares the
moral pain of neglecting her duty with those penalties which she contemns:—
κείνοις ἂν ἤλγουν· τοῖσδε δ’ οὐκ ἀλγύνομαι
(
Ant. 468
). There, too, we have a Sophoclean triad of clauses, the third echoing the first,—as
τῆς σῆς δ’ οὐκ ἐρῶ τιμῆς τυχεῖν
here reiterates the sense of
σοὶ δὲ πλουσία... βίος
(n. on
Ant. 465
ff.).
mvp-comment-215-3
One of the scholia recognises the traditional reading, and explains it correctly: —
τοῦτο μόνον ἐμὲ βοσκέτω, τὸ μὴ λυπεῖν ἐμὲ αὐτήν, εἰ
(‘as I should do, if’)
τοῖς φονεῦσι τοῦ πατρὸς πείθεσθαι ἀναγκασθήσομαι
.—The conjectures have been numerous: see Appendix.
mvp-comment-216-1
οὐδ’ ἂν σὺ
306
mvp-comment-217-1
παῖδα
307
mvp-comment-217-2
κεκλῆσθαι
308
mvp-comment-218-1
πλείστοις
309
mvp-comment-219-1
μηδὲν
310
πρὸς ὀργὴν
311
mvp-comment-220-1
ἀμφοῖν
312
τοῖς λόγοις
313
mvp-comment-221-1
τῆσδε … αὕτη
314
πάλιν
315
mvp-comment-222-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
316
mvp-comment-222-2
πως
317
mvp-comment-222-3
μύθων
318
mvp-comment-223-1
οὐδ’
319
κοὐδ’
320
ποτέ
321
mvp-comment-224-1
ἰὸν
322
mvp-comment-224-2
σχήσει
323
mvp-comment-225-1
τὸ δεινὸν
324
mvp-comment-225-2
εἰ γὰρ τῶνδέ μοι
325
εἰ
326
mvp-comment-226-1
γὰρ
327
mvp-comment-226-2
γόων
328
λόγων
329
mvp-comment-227-1
ἐνταῦθα
330
mvp-comment-227-2
ἔνθα μή ποτε … προσόψει
331
mvp-comment-227-3
ζῶσα
332
mvp-comment-227-4
κατηρεφεῖ
333
mvp-comment-227-5
χθονὸς τῆσδ’ ἐκτὸς
334
mvp-comment-227-6
ὑμνήσεις
335
mvp-comment-228-1
πρὸς ταῦτα
336
mvp-comment-228-2
Nauck reads
κοὔ
337
καί
338
mvp-comment-228-3
ἐν καλῷ, εὔκαιρον
schol.:
H. 4. 3. 5
νομίσαντες οὐκ ἐν καλῷ εἶναι πρὸς τοὺς ὁπλίτας ἱππομαχεῖν
: so, too,
Eur.
Heracl. 971
, etc. Cp.
καλόν
(
ἐστι
)=
καίριον
in
Soph.
Ph. 1155
; and
εἰς καλόν
=
καιρίως
in
O.T. 78.
mvp-comment-229-1
ἦ ταῦτα δὴ
339
ἦ … δὴ
340
ἦ … γὰρ
341
mvp-comment-229-2
καὶ βεβούλευνται
342
mvp-comment-230-1
ἀλλ’ ἐξίκοιτο
343
mvp-comment-230-2
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκ’
344
mvp-comment-231-1
τίνα … τόνδ’
345
mvp-comment-231-2
τάλαινα
346
mvp-comment-232-1
εἴ τι τῶνδε
347
mvp-comment-233-1
ποῦ ποτ’ εἶ φρενῶν
348
mvp-comment-234-1
ὅπως
349
ὑμῶν
350
mvp-comment-234-2
προσώτατ’
351
προσωτάτω φύγω
352
mvp-comment-235-1
βίου … τοῦ παρόντος
353
mvp-comment-236-1
καλὸς γὰρ
354
mvp-comment-236-2
θαυμάσαι
355
mvp-comment-237-1
τοῖς φίλοις
356
mvp-comment-238-1
εἰκαθεῖν
357
mvp-comment-239-1
ταῦτα
358
οὐκ ἐμοὺς
359
mvp-comment-240-1
γε
360
μέντοι
361
mvp-comment-240-2
μὴ )ξ
362
mvp-comment-240-3
πεσεῖν
363
mvp-comment-240-4
399 A woman, speaking of herself in the plur., uses the masc.:
Ant. 926
παθόντες ἂν ξυγγνοῖμεν ἡμαρτηκότες
.
mvp-comment-241-1
συγγνώμην
364
mvp-comment-242-1
τἄπη
365
mvp-comment-242-2
πρὸς κακῶν
366
mvp-comment-243-1
μή πω
367
mvp-comment-244-1
οἷπερ … ὁδοῦ
368
mvp-comment-245-1
τῷ φέρεις
369
mvp-comment-245-2
ἔμπυρα
370
mvp-comment-246-1
τυμβεῦσαι χοάς
371
mvp-comment-247-1
βροτῶν
372
mvp-comment-248-1
ὃν ἔκταν’ αὐτή
373
ὅν γ’
374
mvp-comment-249-1
τῷ τοῦτ’ ἤρεσεν
375
mvp-comment-250-1
δείματος
376
mvp-comment-250-2
δοκεῖν ἐμοί
377
mvp-comment-251-1
θεοὶ πατρῷοι
378
mvp-comment-251-2
συγγένεσθέ γ’
379
mvp-comment-251-3
ἀλλὰ νῦν
380
mvp-comment-252-1
εἴποιμ’ ἂν τότε
381
mvp-comment-253-1
ἐπὶ σμικρὸν
382
ἐπὶ σμικρῶν
383
mvp-comment-253-2
φράσαι
384
mvp-comment-254-1
σμικροὶ λόγοι
385
mvp-comment-255-1
πατρὸς … δευτέραν ὁμιλίαν
386
mvp-comment-255-2
ἐφέστιον πῆξαι
387
mvp-comment-255-3
This sceptre is described in the
Iliad (2. 101 f.) as the work of Hephaestus, who gave it Zeus; Hermes transmitted it to Pelops, from whom it passed to Atreus and Agamemnon. The Homeric sceptre is often called
χρύσεον
(
Il. 2. 268
, etc.), prob. as being ornamented with gold foil, or studded with gold nails (
Il. 1. 246
χρυσείοις ἥλοισι πεπαρμένον
). Among the objects found at Mycenae are some supposed remains of such sceptres (Schliem.,
Myc. 201, etc.).
mvp-comment-255-4
οὑφόρει ποτέ
388
mvp-comment-256-1
ἔκ τε
389
ἐκ δὲ
390
mvp-comment-256-2
βρύοντα
391
mvp-comment-256-3
ᾧ … γενέσθαι
392
mvp-comment-256-4
The vision resembles that of Astyages, who dreamed that a vine sprang from his daughter Mandanè, the wife of Cambyses,
τὴν δὲ ἄμπελον ἐπισχεῖν τὴν Ἀσίην πᾶσαν
. The
ὀνειροπόλοι
explained this to mean that her son (Cyrus) should reign in his grandfather's stead. (
Her. 1. 108.
) The spreading branches figure also in the dream of Xerxes (7. 19):
ἐδόκεε...ἐστεφανῶσθαι ἐλαίης θαλλῷ, ἀπὸ δὲ τῆς ἐλαίης τοὺς κλάδους γῆν πᾶσαν ἐπισχεῖν
.
mvp-comment-256-5
In choosing the
sceptre of Agamemnon as the stock from which the wondrous growth is put forth, Sophocles may have had in mind the words of Achilles (
Il. 1. 234
ff.);
ναὶ μὰ τόδε σκῆπτρον· τὸ μὲν οὔποτε φύλλα καὶ ὄζους
|
φύσει, ἐπεὶ δὴ πρῶτα τομὴν ἐν ὄρεσσι λέλοιπεν
, |
οὐδ’ ἀναθηλήσει
.
mvp-comment-257-1
του παρόντος
393
τοῦ
394
παρόντος
395
του
396
mvp-comment-257-2
Ἡλίῳ δείκνυσι τοὖναρ
397
mvp-comment-258-1
οὐ κάτοιδα, πλὴν
398
mvp-comment-258-2
πέμπει με κείνη
399
mvp-comment-259-1
These three verses, which the MSS. give to Electra, and which several recent critics reject (cr. n.), clearly belong to Chrysothemis, and are genuine. Electra's exclamation of joy (411) caused Chrysothemis to ask if her sister had any ground for hope (412). Electra replied that, when she had heard the dream, she would say. This showed her sister that Electra relied merely on the fact that Clytaemnestra had seen
some fearful vision. Now, therefore, instead of asking for Electra's interpretation, she merely repeats her counsel (383 f.) before proceeding on her errand. The words
πρός
νυν θεῶν κ.τ.λ.
(428 ff.) show the train of her thought. To Chrysothemis, the alarm of Clytaemnestra (427) is more important than the apparition of Agamemnon. The dream is only a new reason why Electra should be cautious,—not why she should hope.
mvp-comment-259-2
The current ascription of the verses to Electra was doubtless prompted by verse 413. It was supposed that the recital of Chrysothemis must be immediately followed by the comments of Electra. But, as Hermann observed, the phrase
ἀβουλίᾳ πεσεῖν
would alone suffice to show that the verses belong to Chrysothemis (
cp. 398
). Nor could the warning,
σὺν κακῷ μέτει πάλιν
, be fitly uttered by Electra.
mvp-comment-259-3
τῶν ἐγγενῶν
400
mvp-comment-260-1
ἀβουλίᾳ
401
mvp-comment-260-2
σὺν κακῷ
402
mvp-comment-260-3
μέτει
403
mvp-comment-261-1
ἀλλ’
404
mvp-comment-261-2
ὦ φίλη
405
τούτων μὲν
406
mvp-comment-262-1
οὐ … θέμις
407
οὐδ’ ὅσιον
408
mvp-comment-262-2
ἐχθρᾶς ἀπὸ γυναικὸς
409
mvp-comment-262-3
κτερίσματ’
410
mvp-comment-262-4
λουτρὰ
411
mvp-comment-263-1
ἀλλ’ ἢ πνοαῖσιν
412
ῥοαῖσιν
413
mvp-comment-263-2
κρύψον
414
mvp-comment-263-3
νιν
415
mvp-comment-263-4
ἔνθα μή ποτ’
416
ἔνθεν
417
mvp-comment-263-5
εὐνὴν
418
mvp-comment-264-1
ἀλλ’ ὅταν θάῃν
419
mvp-comment-264-2
The conjecture
ἔστ’ ἂν
420
ὅταν
421
σῳζέσθω
422
mvp-comment-264-3
κειμήλἰ
423
mvp-comment-265-1
ἀρχὴν
424
τλημονεστάτη
425
mvp-comment-266-1
ἔβλαστε
426
mvp-comment-267-1
ὅν γ’ … τῷδ’
427
mvp-comment-267-2
ἐπέστεφε
428
mvp-comment-267-3
442 f. The position of
αὐτῇ
429
mvp-comment-267-4
δέξεσθαι
430
mvp-comment-267-5
It seems, then, a reasonable inference that here, where the reference is to future time, he would have written
δέξεσθαι
431
δέξασθαι
432
mvp-comment-267-6
444 ff. Join
θανὼν ἄτιμος
433
mvp-comment-267-7
ἐμασχαλίσθη
434
mvp-comment-267-8
Two different motives are assigned by the Greek commentators; viz.:—(1) the desire to render the dead incapable of wreaking vengeance (
ὥσπερ τὴν δύναμιν ἐκείνων ἀφαιρούμενοι
): (2) the desire to make an atonement (
ἐξιλάσασθαι τὴν δολοφονίαν—ἀφοσιοῦσθαι τὸν φόνον
). There can be little doubt that the first of these motives was the primitive origin of the custom. If the second was afterwards blended with it, the idea may have been that of offering the severed portions to the gods below,—as a victim was devoted to death by cutting off a lock of hair (
Eur.
Alc. 75
). Apollonius Rhodius seems to present the practice in this light (4. 477): Jason, having slain a foe,
ἐξάργματα τάμνε θανόντος
. Cp.
Etym. Magn.:
ἀπάργματα λέγεται τὰ ὑπὸ τῶν τραγῳδῶν λεγόμενα μασχαλίσματα
.
mvp-comment-267-9
κἀπὶ λουτροῖσιν
435
mvp-comment-267-10
ἐξέμαξ ν
436
mvp-comment-267-11
ἆρα μὴ
437
mvp-comment-268-1
οὐκ ἔστιν
438
mvp-comment-268-2
ταῦτα μὲν μέθες· σὺ δὲ
439
mvp-comment-269-1
βοστρύχων ἄκρας φόβας
440
mvp-comment-269-2
κἀμοῦ ταλαίνης
441
mvp-comment-270-1
†ἀλιπαρῆ
442
λιπαρῆ
443
mvp-comment-270-2
We come, therefore, to a dilemma. (1) The words
τήνδ’ ἀλιπαρῆ τρίχα
may conceal some corruption:
τήνδ’
ought possibly to be
τήνδε τ’
444
ἀλίπαρον
445
mvp-comment-270-3
(2) Or else, if the text be sound,
ἀλιπαρῆ
may mean
οὐ λιπαράν
. There is no doubt that
λιπ
, ‘fat,’ is the root both of
λι^παρός
, ‘shining,’ and of
λι—παρής
, ‘sticking’; cp.
Plat.
Crat. 427 B
τὸ λιπαρὸν καὶ τὸ κολλῶδες
(
Curt.
Etym. § 340
). Similarly
γλίσχρος
, ‘sticky,’ came to mean ‘importunate.’ It is barely possible that, in coining a new negative compound, the poet may have transferred the sense of
λιπαρός
to
λιπαρής
: but it seems improbable.
mvp-comment-271-1
ζῶμα
446
mvp-comment-271-2
χλιδαῖς
447
mvp-comment-272-1
προσπίτνουσα
448
αὐτὸν
449
mvp-comment-273-1
ἐξ ὑπερτέρας χερός
450
mvp-comment-273-2
ζῶντ’
451
mvp-comment-274-1
ἀφνεωτέραις
452
mvp-comment-274-2
στέφωμεν
453
mvp-comment-274-3
δωρούμεθα
454
mvp-comment-275-1
οἶμαι μὲν οὖν
455
mvp-comment-275-2
If
μέλον
456
μέλειν
457
μέλον
458
mvp-comment-276-1
σοί
459
mvp-comment-277-1
βροτῶν
460
mvp-comment-278-1
πρὸς εὐσέβειαν
461
mvp-comment-279-1
δράσω
462
mvp-comment-279-2
τὸ γὰρ δίκαιον
463
mvp-comment-279-3
(1)
τὸ δίκαιον
is an acc. of general reference, and
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
is impersonal. ‘With regard to what is (clearly) right, it is unreasonable for two persons to dispute; rather both should hasten on the doing (of it).’ With
ἀλλ’ ἐπισπεύδειν
we supply the notion
δεῖ
from the negative
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
(as from
οὐκ ἔξεστι
in
O. C. 1402
ff.; cp.
O. T. 817
ff.). For the form of the sentence, cp.
H. 7. 3. 7
τοὺς περὶ Ἀρχίαν...οὐ ψῆφον ἀνεμείνατε, ἀλλὰ ὁπότε πρῶτον ἐδυνάσθητε ἐτιμωρήσασθε
. So here the acc.
τὸ δίκαιον
, which represents the object of
δρᾶν
, is separated from it by the parenthesis
οὐκ
ἔχει λόγον δυοῖν ἐρίζειν
. (The first scholium gives substantially this view:
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον φιλονεικεῖν περὶ τοῦ δικαίου, ὥστε περὶ αὐτοῦ δύο ὄντας ἐρίζειν
.)
mvp-comment-279-4
(2) Or
τὸ δίκαιον
might be nom.: ‘that which is clearly right does not
afford any ground (
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
) for two persons to dispute,’ etc. So the second schol.:
ἢ τὸ οὐκ ἔχει λόγον ἀντὶ τοῦ οὐ παρέχει πρόφασιν
. So far as the verb
ἔχει
is concerned, this sense is quite admissible: cp.
Thuc. 2. 41
οὔτε τῷ πολεμίῳ ἐπελθόντι ἀγανάκτησιν ἔχει
(
ἡ πόλις
). The objection is that the phrases
ἔχειν λόγον, οὐκ ἔχειν λόγον
, which are very common, regularly mean, ‘to be reasonable,’ ‘to be unreasonable.’ This is so both in the personal and in the impersonal constr.; as Plat.
Phaedop. 62 D
τὸ γὰρ μὴ ἀγανακτεῖν...οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
:
Dem. or. 36 § 54
πῶς ἔχει λόγον σὲ...δίκην ἀξιοῦν λαμβάνειν
; The supposed sense, ‘not to
afford a reason,’ is unexampled.
mvp-comment-279-5
δυοῖν
464
mvp-comment-280-1
παρ’ ὑμῶν
465
mvp-comment-281-1
πικρὰν
466
δοκῶ με … τολμήσειν
467
ἔτι
468
mvp-comment-282-1
εἰ μὴ )γὼ
469
mvp-comment-282-2
γνώμας λειπομένα
470
mvp-comment-283-1
ἁ πρόμαντις Δίκα
471
mvp-comment-283-2
δίκαια φερομένα χεροῖν κράτη
472
mvp-comment-284-1
μέτεισιν
473
mvp-comment-284-2
οὐ μακροῦ χρόνου
474
mvp-comment-285-1
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
475
κλύουσαν
476
mvp-comment-285-2
ἁδυπνόων … ὀνειράτων
477
mvp-comment-286-1
ἀμναστεῖ γ’ ὁ φύσας ς’
478
mvp-comment-287-1
χαλκόπλακτος
479
mvp-comment-287-2
γένυς
480
mvp-comment-287-3
The very axe (
φόνιος πέλεκυς
, 99) with which the blow was dealt is imagined as nourishing a grudge against the murderers who had set it such a task. Such a personification recalls that practice of Athenian law by which inanimate objects which had caused death were brought to a formal trial in the court called
τὸ ἐπὶ Πρυτανείῳ
, and, after sentence, cast beyond the boundaries, in the presence of the Archon Basileus and the sacrificial officers of the tribes (
φυλο‐
βασιλεῖς
). Aeschin. or. 3 § 244
τὰ μὲν ξύλα καὶ τοὺς λίθους καὶ τὸν σίδηρον, τὰ ἄφωνα καὶ ἀγνώμονα, ἐάν τῳ ἐμπεσόντα ἀποκτείνῃ, ὑπερορίζομεν
. (Cp.
Dem. or. 23 § 76
.) A like conception was implied in the English law (repealed in 1846) of ‘deodands’ (Deo danda),
i.e., personal chattels (whether animals or things) which, having caused the death of a human being, were forfeited to the Crown for pious uses.
mvp-comment-288-1
ἐν αἰκίαις
481
mvp-comment-289-1
καὶ πολύπους καὶ πολύχειρ
482
mvp-comment-290-1
λόχοις
483
mvp-comment-290-2
χαλκόπους
484
mvp-comment-291-1
ἄλεκτρ’ ἄνυμφα
485
mvp-comment-291-2
γάμων ἁμιλλήμαθ’
486
mvp-comment-291-3
ἐπέβα
487
mvp-comment-292-1
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι … συνδρῶσιν
488
mvp-comment-292-2
Verses 495—497 (
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι...τέρας
) answer metrically to vv. 479—481
ὕπεστί μοι...ὀνειράτων
, where the text is certain, save for the doubt whether
θράσος
or
θάρσος
should stand in 479. Here we must first decide two points.
mvp-comment-292-3
(1) Are the words
πρὸ τῶνδε
489
mvp-comment-292-4
(2) Could
ἔχει με, μήποτε τέρας πελᾶν
(etc.) mean, ‘
the belief possesses me, that’ etc.? Surely not. No real parallel for so strange a phrase has been produced. It is irrelevant to quote those impersonal verbs which directly express the
occurrence of a thought to the mind; as
Xen.
An. 6. 1. 17
εἰσῄει αὐτοὺς ὅπως ἂν καὶ ἔχοντές τι οἴκαδε ἀφίκοιντο
(‘the thought came to them, how they might,’ etc.):
Thuc. 6. 78.
§ 1
εἰ δέ τῳ ἄρα παρέστηκε, τὸν μὲν Συρακόσιον...πολέμιον εἶναι κ.τ.λ.
Either, then, the subject to
ἔχει
has dropped out, or the words
μ’ ἔχει
conceal a corruption.
mvp-comment-292-5
The following remedies are possible: I incline to the first, as involving least change. (1) Reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
, we may read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοί μ’ ἔχει
|
<θάρσος τι>, μήποθ’ ἡμῖν
etc. (It may be remarked that
τι
is in harmony with the tone of
ὕπεστί μοι
in 479.) Another available word is
ξύννοια
(cp.
Ant. 279
). (2) Or, reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θάρσος
, we could read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι θάρσος ἴσχει με
. On either view, the
υ
of
ἁδυπνόων
in 480 is long (as several critics have assumed). It should be noted that (1) involves a different constitution of the verses: see p. lxxxii.
mvp-comment-292-6
In those MSS. which have
μή ποτε μή ποθ’ ἡμῖν
490
mvp-comment-293-1
ἀψεγές
491
ἀψεφές
492
mvp-comment-293-2
πελᾶν
493
mvp-comment-294-1
τοῖς δρῶσι
494
τοῖς συνδρῶσιν
495
mvp-comment-295-1
μαντεῖαι βροτῶν
496
mvp-comment-296-1
εὖ κατασχήσει
497
mvp-comment-297-1
ἱππεία
498
mvp-comment-297-2
Oenomaüs, king of Pisa in Elis, had promised the hand of his daughter Hippodameia to the suitor who should defeat him in a chariot-race; the penalty of failure being death. The young Pelops, son of Tantalus, offered himself as a competitor. Myrtilus, the charioteer of Oenomaüs, was persuaded (either by Hippodameia or by Pelops) to betray his master. He did so by leaving out one or both of the linch-pins by which the naves of the chariot-wheels were secured to the axles.
Tzetzes on Lycophron 156
ταῖς χοινίκισι
(=
πλήμναις
, the naves)
τῶν τροχῶν οὐκ ἐμβαλὼν τοὺς ἥλους
. According to another story, he substituted a linch-pin of wax for a real one (
schol. Apoll. Rh. 752
ἐμβαλόντα κήρινον ἔμβολον ἐπὶ τοῦ ἀκραξονίου
). So Pelops won the race, and the bride. But Oenomaüs was soon avenged on the traitor; for Myrtilus insulted Hippodameia, and was thrown into the sea by Pelops; upon whose house he invoked a curse, as he sank.
mvp-comment-297-3
Euripides, too, (
Or. 990
ff.,
Helen. 386 f.) refers to this chariot-race as the event with which the troubles of the Pelopidae began. Apollonius Rhodius briefly describes the critical moment of the race as one of the subjects embroidered on the cloak of Jason (1. 752 ff.); there Oenomaüs was seen, ‘falling sideways, as the axle broke at the naves of the wheels,’—
ἄξονος ἐν πλήμνῃσι παρακλιδὸν ἀγνυμένοιο
|
πίπτεν
.
mvp-comment-297-4
The eastern pediment of the temple of Zeus at Olympia (
circ. 450 B.C.) was adorned with sculptures by Paeonius, representing the preparation for this contest (
Paus. 5. 10. 6
). The fragments found on the site have sufficed for a reconstruction of the group. Zeus occupied the centre; to the right of him were Pelops and Hippodameia; to the left, Oenomaüs and his wife Steropè. On each side was a chariot drawn by four horses. Myrtilus was sitting in front of his team, with his face turned away from his master.
mvp-comment-297-5
In the older and nobler form of the myth, Pelops won, not by a fraud, but by the grace of Poseidon, who gave him winged horses (Pindar
O. 1. 87
ἔδωκεν δίφρον τε χούσεον πτεροῖσίν τ’ ἀκάμαντας ἵππους
). On the chest (
λάρναξ
) of Cypselus, seen by Pausanias in the Heraeum at Olympia (
Paus. 5. 17. 5
), Pelops was driving two winged horses.
mvp-comment-298-1
αἰανὴς
499
mvp-comment-298-2
The form
αἰανὴς
has the best authority, and some critics hold that
αἰανὸς
(Hesych.) was a Byzantine invention. But in
Aesch.
Eum. 416
,
ἡμεῖς γάρ ἐσμεν νυκτὸς αἰανῆς τέκνα
(so L, schol., and Tzetzes on Lycophron 406),
αἰανῆ
is far less suitable.
mvp-comment-299-1
εὖτε
500
mvp-comment-299-2
ὁ ποντισθεὶς Μυρτίλος
501
mvp-comment-299-3
A vase found at Capua shows Pelops and Hippodameia in a ship, from which Myrtilus is falling backwards into the water. A winged Erinys hovers in the air above, brandishing a sword over the head of Pelops (Baumeister,
Denkmäler p. 1204, referring to
Mon. Inst. x. 25).
mvp-comment-299-4
ἐκοιμάθη
502
mvp-comment-300-1
παγχρυσέων δίφρων
503
mvp-comment-301-1
πρόρριζος
504
mvp-comment-301-2
ἐκριφθείς
505
mvp-comment-302-1
ἔλειπεν
506
ἔλιπεν
507
οἴκου
508
οἴκους
509
πω
510
mvp-comment-303-1
πολύπονος
511
αἰκία
512