mvp-comment-104-1
εὐμαρὴς θεός
1
θεός
2
mvp-comment-105-1
οὔτε γὰρ
3
mvp-comment-105-2
Κρῖσαν
4
mvp-comment-105-3
Crisa stood about two miles W.S.W. of Delphi, on a spur of Parnassus, at the lower outlet of the gorge through which the river Pleistus issues into the plain. The
Iliad mentions ‘sacred Crisa’ (
ζαθέην
, 2. 520). But the Homeric Hymn to the Pythian Apollo is the best witness to its ancient power. There, just as here, the name
Κρῖσα
includes the land which stretches southward from the town to its harbour on the ‘wide gulf’ (vv. 253— 261). We need not, then, read
Κρίσᾳ
or
Κρίσας
. Crisa was the earliest seat of trade on the western sea; Delphi, when first founded, was merely a sanctuary in its territory. Pindar recalls the old prominence of its name when he describes a Pythian victory as won
Κρισαίαις ἐνὶ πτυχαῖς
(
P. 6. 18).
mvp-comment-105-4
Cirrha, a town of much later date, was the port of Crisa on the gulf. About 585 B.C., the Delphians, aided by Cleisthenes of Sicyon and his allies, succeeded, after a long struggle, in humbling Crisa and destroying Cirrha. The Crisaean plain was then devoted to Apollo, whose domain was thus extended from his temple to the coast. When Sophocles wrote, that ground was still a
βούνομος ἀκτή
, inviolable by plough or spade. It was not till the middle of the next century that the alleged encroachments of Amphissa on the
ἱερὰ χώρα
gave a pretext for war to the Amphictyons (355 B.C.).
mvp-comment-105-5
Ulrichs (
Reisen in Griechenland) was the first to place the relations of Crisa and Cirrha in a clear light. Strabo correctly describes the site of Cirrha, but erroneously places Crisa to the east of it (9. p. 418).
mvp-comment-106-1
βούνομον
5
βουνόμον
6
mvp-comment-106-2
βούνομον ἀκτὰν
7
Κρῖσαν
8
mvp-comment-107-1
ἀπερίτροπος
9
mvp-comment-108-1
παρὰ τὸν Ἀχέροντα
10
ἀνάσσων
11
θεὸς
12
mvp-comment-109-1
μὲν
13
mvp-comment-109-2
ὁ πολὺς … βίοτος
14
mvp-comment-109-3
ἀνέλπιστος
15
mvp-comment-109-4
187 *
τεκέων
. I am now satisfied that this is a true correction of
τοκέων
16
ἅτις
17
τοκέων
18
mvp-comment-110-1
ἁπερεί
19
mvp-comment-110-2
ἔποικος
20
mvp-comment-111-1
οἰκονομῶ θαλάμους
21
mvp-comment-112-1
ἀεικεῖ σὺν στολᾷ
22
mvp-comment-113-1
κεναῖς δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
23
ἀμφίσταμαι
24
mvp-comment-113-2
Hartung, reading
κενὰ δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
, takes the sense to be that she stands ‘hungry’ by the tables at which the others feast. But
κενή
as=
νῆστις
would be neither usual nor elegant.
mvp-comment-114-1
Hitherto the Chorus have offered consolation or counsel. At v. 213 they return to that strain. But here, moved by Electra's misery, they join with her in bewailing its cause.
mvp-comment-114-2
οἰκτρὰ μὲν … πλαγά
25
κοίταις
26
οἰκτρὰ … αὐδὰ
27
mvp-comment-114-3
Sophocles, who follows the Homeric story as to the banquet, could not but remember the
οἰκτροτάτην ὄπα
of the dying Cassandra. And this might naturally suggest to him that other
οἰκτρὰ αὐδή
which she had uttered at an earlier moment, immediately after Agamemnon's return,—her presage of his fate, and her own:
Aesch.
Ag. 1072
—1314.
mvp-comment-114-4
The sense then is:—‘There was a voice of lamentation at the return from Troy’; alluding especially to Cassandra's laments, but also, perhaps, to forebodings in the mouth of the people at Mycenae. ‘And there was a voice of lamentation
ἐν κοίταις πατρῴαις
, when thy father lay on the couch at the fatal banquet.’ The ‘voice’ at the banquet is, first, that of the dying Agamemnon; but Sophocles may have thought also of Cassandra's death-cry, which was sounding in the king's ears as he fell.—For other interpretations, see Appendix.
mvp-comment-114-5
νόστοις
28
ἐν
29
mvp-comment-114-6
κοίταις
30
mvp-comment-114-7
ὅτε οἱ
31
σοι
32
ἀνταία
33
mvp-comment-114-8
γενύων
34
mvp-comment-115-1
δόλος … ἔρος
35
mvp-comment-116-1
δεινὰν δεινῶς
36
δεινὰν … μορφάν
37
mvp-comment-116-2
εἴτ’ οὖν … εἴτε
38
βροτῶν
39
mvp-comment-117-1
πλέον … ἐχθίστα
40
mvp-comment-117-2
δὴ
41
mvp-comment-118-1
νὺξ
42
mvp-comment-118-2
δείπνων
43
mvp-comment-119-1
ἄχθη
44
τοῖς
45
θανάτους
46
mvp-comment-119-2
διδύμαιν χειροῖν
47
διδύμοιν
48
mvp-comment-120-1
εἷλον … πρόδοτον
49
mvp-comment-121-1
οἷς
50
mvp-comment-121-2
Ὀλύμπιος
51
mvp-comment-122-1
ποίνιμα
52
mvp-comment-123-1
ἀγλαΐας
53
mvp-comment-123-2
ἀποναίατο
54
mvp-comment-124-1
πόρσω
55
mvp-comment-125-1
γνώμαν ἴσχεις
56
mvp-comment-125-2
ἐξ οἵων
57
mvp-comment-125-3
τὰ παρόντ’
58
mvp-comment-125-4
οἰκείας
59
mvp-comment-126-1
πολύ … τι κακῶν
60
mvp-comment-126-2
ὑπερεκτήσω
61
mvp-comment-127-1
τὰ δὲ
62
οὐκ ἐριστὰ τοῖς δυνατοῖς
63
πλάθειν
64
mvp-comment-127-2
ἐριστά
65
mvp-comment-127-3
πλάθειν
66
mvp-comment-128-1
δεινοῖς ἠναγκάσθην
67
mvp-comment-129-1
ὀργά
68
ἔξοιδ’
69
mvp-comment-130-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
70
mvp-comment-130-2
ἐν … δεινοῖς
71
mvp-comment-130-3
σχήσω
72
mvp-comment-130-4
ταύτας ἄτας
73
mvp-comment-131-1
ὄφρα
74
mvp-comment-131-2
βίος ἔχῃ με
75
σχήσω
76
mvp-comment-132-1
τίνι γάρ … τίνι φρονοῦντι καίρια
77
ἀκούσαιμ’ ἂν πρόσφορον ἔπος
78
τίνι
79
πρόσφορον
80
mvp-comment-132-2
Other explanations are:—(1) Taking the dative with
πρόσφορον
:—‘To what person who feels aright would that word be suitable which I should hear (=which would be said of me)?’ That is: Should I not deserve to incur a censure from which every right-minded person would shrink? Should I not deserve to be called
δυσσεβής
? This seems forced; and it does not well suit
ἔπος
. (2) Taking the dative with
ἀκούσαιμι
:—‘At whose mouth (=
from whom), that thinks aright, could I hear a suitable word of comfort?’ But such a dative seems impossible. In
Il. 16. 515
δύνασαι δὲ σὺ πάντοσ’ ἀκούειν
|
ἀνέρι κηδομένῳ
, the dat. is one of interest, denoting the person whose prayer is heard (‘
for him’); cp.
Il. 5. 115
κλῦθί μοι
: 24. 335
ἔκλυες ᾧ κ’ ἐθέλῃσθα
.
mvp-comment-133-1
ἄνετε
81
mvp-comment-133-2
ἄλυτα
82
mvp-comment-133-3
κεκλήσεται
83
mvp-comment-133-4
231 f. For
ἐκ
84
mvp-comment-133-5
ἀνάριθμος
85
θρήνων
86
mvp-comment-134-1
ἀλλ’ οὖν
87
γε
88
εὐνοίᾳ
89
mvp-comment-135-1
μάτηρ ὡσεί τις
90
mvp-comment-136-1
μὴ τίκτειν
91
mvp-comment-136-2
ἄταν ἄταις
92
mvp-comment-137-1
καὶ τί μέτρον
93
κακότατος
94
mvp-comment-137-2
φέρε
95
mvp-comment-137-3
ἐπὶ τοῖς φθ.
96
mvp-comment-138-1
ἔβλαστ’
97
mvp-comment-139-1
τούτοις
98
mvp-comment-140-1
εἴ τῳ πρόσκειμαι χρηστῷ
99
mvp-comment-141-1
ξυνναίοιμ’
100
mvp-comment-141-2
εὔκηλος
101
mvp-comment-141-3
γονέων
102
ἐκτίμους
103
mvp-comment-141-4
ἐκτίμους ἵσχουσα
104
mvp-comment-141-5
πτέρυγας … γόων
105
mvp-comment-141-6
ὀξυτόνων
106
mvp-comment-142-1
εἰ γὰρ
107
mvp-comment-142-2
γᾶ
108
mvp-comment-142-3
οὐδὲν
109
ὢν
110
εἰ
111
mvp-comment-142-4
Electra is contrasting her father, whose earthly life has been cut short, with his murderers, who survive. But she believes that his spirit lives in the world below, and will be active in aiding the vengeance (453 ff.).
mvp-comment-142-5
πάλιν
112
mvp-comment-142-6
ἀντιφόνους δίκας
113
mvp-comment-143-1
ἔρροι τ’
114
mvp-comment-143-2
αἰδὼς
115
εὐσέβεια
116
mvp-comment-144-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
117
mvp-comment-144-2
καὶ
118
τὸ σὸν … καὶ τοὐμὸν
119
mvp-comment-145-1
νίκα
120
mvp-comment-145-2
ἅμα
121
mvp-comment-146-1
πολλοῖσι θρήνοις
122
mvp-comment-147-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
123
mvp-comment-148-1
ἥτις εὐγενὴς γυνή
124
mvp-comment-149-1
πατρῷα … πήματα
125
mvp-comment-150-1
κατ’ εὐφρόνην
126
mvp-comment-150-2
θάλλοντα
127
mvp-comment-151-1
ᾗ
128
mvp-comment-151-2
πρῶτα μὲν … εἶτα … ἔπειτα
129
ᾗ
130
mvp-comment-151-3
τὰ μητρὸς
131
mvp-comment-151-4
ἔχθιστα συμβέβηκεν
132
mvp-comment-152-1
κἀκ τῶνδ’ ἄρχομαι
133
mvp-comment-153-1
λαβεῖν … τὸ τητᾶσθαι
134
mvp-comment-154-1
ποίας
135
δοκεῖς
136
mvp-comment-155-1
ἴδω
137
εἰσίδω δ’
138
ἴδω δὲ
139
mvp-comment-155-2
μὲν
140
mvp-comment-156-1
ἐσθήματα
141
mvp-comment-156-2
ἐκείνῳ
142
mvp-comment-156-3
παρεστίους … λοιβάς
143
ἔνθ’ ἐκεῖνον ὤλεσεν
144
mvp-comment-156-4
Acc. to
Homer. Hymn. 29. 4 ff., feasts began and ended with libations to Hestia:
οὐ γὰρ ἄτερ σοῦ
|
εἰλαπίναι θνητοῖσιν, ἵν’ οὐ πρώτῃ πυμάτῃ τε
|
Ἱστίῃ ἀρχόμενος σπένδει μελιηδέα οἶνον
. Soph. fr. 658
<*> πρῷρα λοιβῆς Ἑστία
. Other divinities, including Zeus
σωτήρ
, were similarly honoured; then the paean was sung, and the
πότος
began ( Plat.
Symp.p. 176 A).
mvp-comment-157-1
τούτων
145
mvp-comment-158-1
αὐτοέντην
146
mvp-comment-158-2
Brunck first adopted
αὐτοέντην
147
αὐτοφόντην
148
mvp-comment-158-3
ἡμὶν
149
mvp-comment-159-1
ταλαίνῃ
150
mvp-comment-160-1
ταύτην … τῷδε
151
mvp-comment-161-1
μιάστορι
152
Ἐρινὺν
153
mvp-comment-162-1
ἐγγελῶσα τοῖς ποιουμένοις
154
mvp-comment-163-1
εὑροῦς’
155
τότε
156
mvp-comment-163-2
The conjecture
φρουροῦς’
157
τηροῦς’
158
mvp-comment-164-1
χοροὺς ἵστησι
159
mvp-comment-164-2
μηλοσφαγεῖ … ἱερὰ
160
mvp-comment-164-3
ἔμμην’ ἱερά
161
mvp-comment-164-4
τοῖς σωτηρίοις
162
mvp-comment-164-5
Argive tradition placed Agamemnon's death on the 13th of Gamelion (about the end of January). So said ‘the Argive historians’ (
οἱ Ἀργολικοὶ συγγραφεῖς
),— according to an Argive writer named Deinias, who lived about 225 B.C. (Schol. here: Müller,
Frag. Hist. vol. III. p. 25.) Possibly, then, the idea of Clytaemnestra's hideous festival may have been suggested to the poet by some actual commemoration of the event in Argolis. There was a cult of Agamemnon in various places,—notably in Laconia. (Cp. Roscher's
Lexicon, p. 96.)
mvp-comment-165-1
ἡ δύσμορος
163
κατὰ στέγας
164
mvp-comment-166-1
τέτηκα
165
mvp-comment-166-2
πατρὸς
166
mvp-comment-166-3
The
δαίς
is the feast which, in Homeric fashion (
Il. 1. 467
), would follow the sacrifice (281). Acc. to Eustathius p. 1507. 61 (on
Hom.
Od. 4. 524
ff.),
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαὶς
(or
τράπεζα
) was a proverb
ἐπὶ τῶν ἐπ’ ὀλέθρῳ εὐωχουμένων
. The poet may mean that Clytaemnestra called the festival
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαίς
, in direct allusion to
δεῖπνα ἄρρητα
(203): and this would give a special point to
ἐγγελῶσα
(277). Cp.
Eur.
Or. 1008
τά τ’ ἐπώνυμα δεῖπνα Θυέστου
. But the words do not necessarily imply more than that she called it
Ἀγαμεμνόνεια
.
mvp-comment-167-1
αὐτὴ πρὸς αὑτήν
167
αὑτήν
168
mvp-comment-167-2
κλαῦσαι
169
mvp-comment-167-3
ἡδονὴν φέρει
170
mvp-comment-168-1
ἡ λόγοισι γενναία
171
mvp-comment-169-1
φωνοῦσα
172
mvp-comment-170-1
δύσθεον
173
mvp-comment-170-2
μίσημα
174
mvp-comment-170-3
σοὶ μόνῃ
175
mvp-comment-170-4
τέθνηκεν
176
mvp-comment-170-5
ἐν πένθει
177
mvp-comment-171-1
ἐκ γόων
178
mvp-comment-171-2
οἱ κάτω θεοί
179
mvp-comment-172-1
τάδ’
180
mvp-comment-172-2
ἥξοντ’ Ὀρέστην
181
mvp-comment-173-1
παραστᾶς’
182
mvp-comment-174-1
ἥτις
183
mvp-comment-174-2
ὑπεξέθου
184
mvp-comment-175-1
ἀλλ’ ἴσθι τοι τείσουσά γ’
185
mvp-comment-176-1
ὑλακτεῖ
186
mvp-comment-176-2
σὺν
187
mvp-comment-176-3
πέλας
188
παρών
189
mvp-comment-176-4
301 The adv.
πάντα
190
mvp-comment-176-5
ἄναλκις
191
mvp-comment-176-6
ἡ πᾶσα βλάβη
192
mvp-comment-177-1
σὺν γυναιξὶ
193
mvp-comment-177-2
τὰς μάχας
194
mvp-comment-178-1
ἐφήξειν
195
mvp-comment-179-1
μέλλων … δρᾶν τι
196
mvp-comment-179-2
τὰς οὔσας τε … καὶ τὰς ἀπούσας
197
mvp-comment-179-3
μου
198
μοι
199
mvp-comment-179-4
διέφθορεν
200
mvp-comment-180-1
σωφρονεῖν
201
εὐσεβεῖν
202
mvp-comment-180-2
ἔν τοι κακοῖς
203
mvp-comment-180-3
πολλή )στ’ ἀνάγκη
204
κἀπιτηδεύειν κακά
205
mvp-comment-180-4
I place only a comma, not a colon, after
πάρεστιν
206
mvp-comment-181-1
ὄντος … βεβῶτος
207
mvp-comment-182-1
ἦ κάρτα
208
mvp-comment-182-2
θυραῖον
209
mvp-comment-182-3
οἰχνεῖν
210
mvp-comment-182-4
ἀγροῖσι
211
mvp-comment-182-5
τυγχάνει
212
mvp-comment-183-1
ἦ κἂν … ἱκοίμην
213
ἦ τ<*>ν
214
ἦ δἂν
215
mvp-comment-183-2
ἐς λόγους τοὺς σοὺς ἱκοίμην
216
mvp-comment-184-1
ὡς νῦν
217
ὥς νυν
218
mvp-comment-184-2
ἱστόρει· τί σοι φίλον
219
τό
220
τά
221
mvp-comment-184-3
With the other punctuation,
ἱστόρει τί σοι φίλον
222
mvp-comment-185-1
καὶ δὴ
223
mvp-comment-185-2
τοῦ κασιγνήτου τί φής
224
mvp-comment-185-3
ἥξοντος
225
ἢ μέλλοντος
226
mvp-comment-186-1
φησίν γε
227
mvp-comment-186-2
ποεῖ
228
mvp-comment-187-1
καὶ μὴν ἔγωγ’
229
γε
230
mvp-comment-187-2
οὐκ ὄκνῳ
231
mvp-comment-188-1
ἀρκεῖν
232
mvp-comment-189-1
ἐπεί
233
mvp-comment-189-2
μακρὰν
234
mvp-comment-189-3
324 Here, as in 316,
νῦν
235
νυν
236
mvp-comment-189-4
δόμων
237
φέρουσαν
238
mvp-comment-190-1
ὅμαιμον
239
mvp-comment-190-2
φύσιν
240
mvp-comment-191-1
Χρυσόθεμιν
241
mvp-comment-192-1
οἷα
242
νομίζεται
243
mvp-comment-193-1
πρὸς θυρῶνος ἐξόδοις
244
φωνεῖς
245
ἐλθοῦσα
246
αὖ
247
mvp-comment-193-2
330 For the absence of caesura, cp.
Ph. 101
n.
mvp-comment-194-1
θυμῷ … χαρίζεσθαι
248
mvp-comment-195-1
καίτοι τοσοῦτόν γ’ οἶδα
249
mvp-comment-195-2
κἀμαυτήν, ὅτι
250
mvp-comment-195-3
333 f. For the repeated
ἄν
251
mvp-comment-195-4
οἶ) αὐτοῖς φρονῶ
252
mvp-comment-196-1
ὑφειμένῃ
253
πλεῖν
254
mvp-comment-196-2
For the image, cp.
Eur.
Med. 524
ἄκροισι λαίφους κρασπέδοις
(with close-reefed sails)
ὑπεκφυγεῖν
|
τὴν σὴν στόμαργον, ὦ γύναι, γλωσσαλγίαν
:
Ar.
Ran. 997
ἀλλ’ ὅπως, ὦ γεννάδα
, |
μὴ πρὸς ὀργὴν ἀντιλέξεις
, |
ἀλλὰ συστείλας, ἄκροισι
|
χρώμενος τοῖς ἱστίοις κ.τ.λ.
: and conversely
Soph.
Ant. 715
ναὸς ὅστις ἐγκρατῆ πόδα
|
τείνας ὑπείκει μηδέν
.
Ovid
Epist. 1. 8. 71
moderatius opta, | Et voti, quaeso, contrahe vela tui.
Shakesp.
Henry VI., pt. iii, act 3 sc. 3. 5
‘Now Margaret | Must strike her sail, and learn awhile to serve | Where kings command.’
mvp-comment-197-1
καὶ μὴ δοκεῖν
255
mvp-comment-198-1
τοιαῦτα δ’ ἄλλα
256
ἀλλὰ
257
ἄλλα
258
mvp-comment-199-1
καίτοι τὸ μὲν δίκαιον
259
mvp-comment-199-2
κρίνεις
260
mvp-comment-199-3
εἰ … με δεῖ
261
mvp-comment-199-4
ἐλευθέραν
262
mvp-comment-199-5
ζῆν
263
mvp-comment-199-6
πάντ’
264
mvp-comment-199-7
ἀκουστέα
265
mvp-comment-200-1
δεινόν γε
266
mvp-comment-201-1
τῆς … τικτούσης
267
mvp-comment-201-2
μέλειν
268
mvp-comment-202-1
τἀμὰ νουθετήματα
269
mvp-comment-202-2
κείνης διδακτά
270
mvp-comment-202-3
ἐκ σαυτῆς
271
mvp-comment-203-1
The text, which has been suspected (cr. n.), is sound; but the train of thought is somewhat obscured by compression.
mvp-comment-203-2
‘You forget your father, and care only for your mother. All your counsels to me come from her. Then (
ἔπειτα
),—that being so,—give up the attempt at a compromise. Make a
choice (
ἑλοῦ γε
). You can be imprudent (
φρονεῖν κακῶς
),—as you say that I am,—and loyal to your dead father. Or you can be prudent (
φρονοῦσα
), and forgetful of him,—as you actually are; you who (
ἥτις
) say, indeed, that you would show your hatred of the murderers if you could; and yet, when I
do resist them, you try to turn me from my purpose. You merely add the shame of cowardice to our woes.’
mvp-comment-203-3
ἔπειθ’
272
mvp-comment-203-4
ἑλοῦ γε
273
mvp-comment-203-5
φρονεῖν κακῶς
274
mvp-comment-203-6
Other explanations are:—(1) ‘Choose to be thought either
lost to right feeling, or, if you have such feeling, then at least
forgetful of your duty.’ (2) ‘Choose to seem either
unintelligent (if you are merely the blind instrument of our rulers); or, if you act with clear understanding (
φρονοῦσα
),—thinking to benefit me,—at least forgetful of your father.’ Both these views assume that the question is merely between two interpretations which might be placed on the present conduct of Chrysothemis. But Electra is putting the dilemma between imprudent loyalty and prudent disloyalty.
mvp-comment-204-1
τῶν φίλων
275
mvp-comment-205-1
ἥτις
276
φρονοῦσα
277
μῖσος
278
mvp-comment-206-1
πάντα
279
mvp-comment-206-2
τιμωρουμένης
280
mvp-comment-207-1
οὔτε … τε
281
mvp-comment-207-2
τήν τε δρῶσαν
282
mvp-comment-208-1
πρὸς κακοῖσι
283
mvp-comment-208-2
δειλίαν ἔχει
284
mvp-comment-209-1
ἐπεὶ
285
mvp-comment-209-2
ἢ μάθ’ ἐξ ἐμοῦ
286
mvp-comment-210-1
ἐπαρκούντως
287
mvp-comment-211-1
προσάπτειν
288
mvp-comment-211-2
εἴ τις ἔστ’ ἐκεῖ χάρις
289
mvp-comment-212-1
ἡμὶν
290
ξύνει
291
mvp-comment-213-1
τὰ σὰ … δῶῤ
292
mvp-comment-213-2
ἐφ’ οἶσι
293
mvp-comment-213-3
χλιδᾷς
294
mvp-comment-214-1
ὑπεικάθοιμι
295
mvp-comment-214-2
πλουσία
296
mvp-comment-214-3
περιρρείτω
297
mvp-comment-215-1
τοὐμὲ μὴ λυπεῖν
298
mvp-comment-215-2
Remark the resemblance to the passage where Antigone—summing up her position—compares the
moral pain of neglecting her duty with those penalties which she contemns:—
κείνοις ἂν ἤλγουν· τοῖσδε δ’ οὐκ ἀλγύνομαι
(
Ant. 468
). There, too, we have a Sophoclean triad of clauses, the third echoing the first,—as
τῆς σῆς δ’ οὐκ ἐρῶ τιμῆς τυχεῖν
here reiterates the sense of
σοὶ δὲ πλουσία... βίος
(n. on
Ant. 465
ff.).
mvp-comment-215-3
One of the scholia recognises the traditional reading, and explains it correctly: —
τοῦτο μόνον ἐμὲ βοσκέτω, τὸ μὴ λυπεῖν ἐμὲ αὐτήν, εἰ
(‘as I should do, if’)
τοῖς φονεῦσι τοῦ πατρὸς πείθεσθαι ἀναγκασθήσομαι
.—The conjectures have been numerous: see Appendix.
mvp-comment-216-1
οὐδ’ ἂν σὺ
299
mvp-comment-217-1
παῖδα
300
mvp-comment-217-2
κεκλῆσθαι
301
mvp-comment-218-1
πλείστοις
302
mvp-comment-219-1
μηδὲν
303
πρὸς ὀργὴν
304
mvp-comment-220-1
ἀμφοῖν
305
τοῖς λόγοις
306
mvp-comment-221-1
τῆσδε … αὕτη
307
πάλιν
308
mvp-comment-222-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
309
mvp-comment-222-2
πως
310
mvp-comment-222-3
μύθων
311
mvp-comment-223-1
οὐδ’
312
κοὐδ’
313
ποτέ
314
mvp-comment-224-1
ἰὸν
315
mvp-comment-224-2
σχήσει
316
mvp-comment-225-1
τὸ δεινὸν
317
mvp-comment-225-2
εἰ γὰρ τῶνδέ μοι
318
εἰ
319
mvp-comment-226-1
γὰρ
320
mvp-comment-226-2
γόων
321
λόγων
322
mvp-comment-227-1
ἐνταῦθα
323
mvp-comment-227-2
ἔνθα μή ποτε … προσόψει
324
mvp-comment-227-3
ζῶσα
325
mvp-comment-227-4
κατηρεφεῖ
326
mvp-comment-227-5
χθονὸς τῆσδ’ ἐκτὸς
327
mvp-comment-227-6
ὑμνήσεις
328
mvp-comment-228-1
πρὸς ταῦτα
329
mvp-comment-228-2
Nauck reads
κοὔ
330
καί
331
mvp-comment-228-3
ἐν καλῷ, εὔκαιρον
schol.:
H. 4. 3. 5
νομίσαντες οὐκ ἐν καλῷ εἶναι πρὸς τοὺς ὁπλίτας ἱππομαχεῖν
: so, too,
Eur.
Heracl. 971
, etc. Cp.
καλόν
(
ἐστι
)=
καίριον
in
Soph.
Ph. 1155
; and
εἰς καλόν
=
καιρίως
in
O.T. 78.
mvp-comment-229-1
ἦ ταῦτα δὴ
332
ἦ … δὴ
333
ἦ … γὰρ
334
mvp-comment-229-2
καὶ βεβούλευνται
335
mvp-comment-230-1
ἀλλ’ ἐξίκοιτο
336
mvp-comment-230-2
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκ’
337
mvp-comment-231-1
τίνα … τόνδ’
338
mvp-comment-231-2
τάλαινα
339
mvp-comment-232-1
εἴ τι τῶνδε
340
mvp-comment-233-1
ποῦ ποτ’ εἶ φρενῶν
341
mvp-comment-234-1
ὅπως
342
ὑμῶν
343
mvp-comment-234-2
προσώτατ’
344
προσωτάτω φύγω
345
mvp-comment-235-1
βίου … τοῦ παρόντος
346
mvp-comment-236-1
καλὸς γὰρ
347
mvp-comment-236-2
θαυμάσαι
348
mvp-comment-237-1
τοῖς φίλοις
349
mvp-comment-238-1
εἰκαθεῖν
350
mvp-comment-239-1
ταῦτα
351
οὐκ ἐμοὺς
352
mvp-comment-240-1
γε
353
μέντοι
354
mvp-comment-240-2
μὴ )ξ
355
mvp-comment-240-3
πεσεῖν
356
mvp-comment-240-4
399 A woman, speaking of herself in the plur., uses the masc.:
Ant. 926
παθόντες ἂν ξυγγνοῖμεν ἡμαρτηκότες
.
mvp-comment-241-1
συγγνώμην
357
mvp-comment-242-1
τἄπη
358
mvp-comment-242-2
πρὸς κακῶν
359
mvp-comment-243-1
μή πω
360
mvp-comment-244-1
οἷπερ … ὁδοῦ
361
mvp-comment-245-1
τῷ φέρεις
362
mvp-comment-245-2
ἔμπυρα
363
mvp-comment-246-1
τυμβεῦσαι χοάς
364
mvp-comment-247-1
βροτῶν
365
mvp-comment-248-1
ὃν ἔκταν’ αὐτή
366
ὅν γ’
367
mvp-comment-249-1
τῷ τοῦτ’ ἤρεσεν
368
mvp-comment-250-1
δείματος
369
mvp-comment-250-2
δοκεῖν ἐμοί
370
mvp-comment-251-1
θεοὶ πατρῷοι
371
mvp-comment-251-2
συγγένεσθέ γ’
372
mvp-comment-251-3
ἀλλὰ νῦν
373
mvp-comment-252-1
εἴποιμ’ ἂν τότε
374
mvp-comment-253-1
ἐπὶ σμικρὸν
375
ἐπὶ σμικρῶν
376
mvp-comment-253-2
φράσαι
377
mvp-comment-254-1
σμικροὶ λόγοι
378
mvp-comment-255-1
πατρὸς … δευτέραν ὁμιλίαν
379
mvp-comment-255-2
ἐφέστιον πῆξαι
380
mvp-comment-255-3
This sceptre is described in the
Iliad (2. 101 f.) as the work of Hephaestus, who gave it Zeus; Hermes transmitted it to Pelops, from whom it passed to Atreus and Agamemnon. The Homeric sceptre is often called
χρύσεον
(
Il. 2. 268
, etc.), prob. as being ornamented with gold foil, or studded with gold nails (
Il. 1. 246
χρυσείοις ἥλοισι πεπαρμένον
). Among the objects found at Mycenae are some supposed remains of such sceptres (Schliem.,
Myc. 201, etc.).
mvp-comment-255-4
οὑφόρει ποτέ
381
mvp-comment-256-1
ἔκ τε
382
ἐκ δὲ
383
mvp-comment-256-2
βρύοντα
384
mvp-comment-256-3
ᾧ … γενέσθαι
385
mvp-comment-256-4
The vision resembles that of Astyages, who dreamed that a vine sprang from his daughter Mandanè, the wife of Cambyses,
τὴν δὲ ἄμπελον ἐπισχεῖν τὴν Ἀσίην πᾶσαν
. The
ὀνειροπόλοι
explained this to mean that her son (Cyrus) should reign in his grandfather's stead. (
Her. 1. 108.
) The spreading branches figure also in the dream of Xerxes (7. 19):
ἐδόκεε...ἐστεφανῶσθαι ἐλαίης θαλλῷ, ἀπὸ δὲ τῆς ἐλαίης τοὺς κλάδους γῆν πᾶσαν ἐπισχεῖν
.
mvp-comment-256-5
In choosing the
sceptre of Agamemnon as the stock from which the wondrous growth is put forth, Sophocles may have had in mind the words of Achilles (
Il. 1. 234
ff.);
ναὶ μὰ τόδε σκῆπτρον· τὸ μὲν οὔποτε φύλλα καὶ ὄζους
|
φύσει, ἐπεὶ δὴ πρῶτα τομὴν ἐν ὄρεσσι λέλοιπεν
, |
οὐδ’ ἀναθηλήσει
.
mvp-comment-257-1
του παρόντος
386
τοῦ
387
παρόντος
388
του
389
mvp-comment-257-2
Ἡλίῳ δείκνυσι τοὖναρ
390
mvp-comment-258-1
οὐ κάτοιδα, πλὴν
391
mvp-comment-258-2
πέμπει με κείνη
392
mvp-comment-259-1
These three verses, which the MSS. give to Electra, and which several recent critics reject (cr. n.), clearly belong to Chrysothemis, and are genuine. Electra's exclamation of joy (411) caused Chrysothemis to ask if her sister had any ground for hope (412). Electra replied that, when she had heard the dream, she would say. This showed her sister that Electra relied merely on the fact that Clytaemnestra had seen
some fearful vision. Now, therefore, instead of asking for Electra's interpretation, she merely repeats her counsel (383 f.) before proceeding on her errand. The words
πρός
νυν θεῶν κ.τ.λ.
(428 ff.) show the train of her thought. To Chrysothemis, the alarm of Clytaemnestra (427) is more important than the apparition of Agamemnon. The dream is only a new reason why Electra should be cautious,—not why she should hope.
mvp-comment-259-2
The current ascription of the verses to Electra was doubtless prompted by verse 413. It was supposed that the recital of Chrysothemis must be immediately followed by the comments of Electra. But, as Hermann observed, the phrase
ἀβουλίᾳ πεσεῖν
would alone suffice to show that the verses belong to Chrysothemis (
cp. 398
). Nor could the warning,
σὺν κακῷ μέτει πάλιν
, be fitly uttered by Electra.
mvp-comment-259-3
τῶν ἐγγενῶν
393
mvp-comment-260-1
ἀβουλίᾳ
394
mvp-comment-260-2
σὺν κακῷ
395
mvp-comment-260-3
μέτει
396
mvp-comment-261-1
ἀλλ’
397
mvp-comment-261-2
ὦ φίλη
398
τούτων μὲν
399
mvp-comment-262-1
οὐ … θέμις
400
οὐδ’ ὅσιον
401
mvp-comment-262-2
ἐχθρᾶς ἀπὸ γυναικὸς
402
mvp-comment-262-3
κτερίσματ’
403
mvp-comment-262-4
λουτρὰ
404
mvp-comment-263-1
ἀλλ’ ἢ πνοαῖσιν
405
ῥοαῖσιν
406
mvp-comment-263-2
κρύψον
407
mvp-comment-263-3
νιν
408
mvp-comment-263-4
ἔνθα μή ποτ’
409
ἔνθεν
410
mvp-comment-263-5
εὐνὴν
411
mvp-comment-264-1
ἀλλ’ ὅταν θάῃν
412
mvp-comment-264-2
The conjecture
ἔστ’ ἂν
413
ὅταν
414
σῳζέσθω
415
mvp-comment-264-3
κειμήλἰ
416
mvp-comment-265-1
ἀρχὴν
417
τλημονεστάτη
418
mvp-comment-266-1
ἔβλαστε
419
mvp-comment-267-1
ὅν γ’ … τῷδ’
420
mvp-comment-267-2
ἐπέστεφε
421
mvp-comment-267-3
442 f. The position of
αὐτῇ
422
mvp-comment-267-4
δέξεσθαι
423
mvp-comment-267-5
It seems, then, a reasonable inference that here, where the reference is to future time, he would have written
δέξεσθαι
424
δέξασθαι
425
mvp-comment-267-6
444 ff. Join
θανὼν ἄτιμος
426
mvp-comment-267-7
ἐμασχαλίσθη
427
mvp-comment-267-8
Two different motives are assigned by the Greek commentators; viz.:—(1) the desire to render the dead incapable of wreaking vengeance (
ὥσπερ τὴν δύναμιν ἐκείνων ἀφαιρούμενοι
): (2) the desire to make an atonement (
ἐξιλάσασθαι τὴν δολοφονίαν—ἀφοσιοῦσθαι τὸν φόνον
). There can be little doubt that the first of these motives was the primitive origin of the custom. If the second was afterwards blended with it, the idea may have been that of offering the severed portions to the gods below,—as a victim was devoted to death by cutting off a lock of hair (
Eur.
Alc. 75
). Apollonius Rhodius seems to present the practice in this light (4. 477): Jason, having slain a foe,
ἐξάργματα τάμνε θανόντος
. Cp.
Etym. Magn.:
ἀπάργματα λέγεται τὰ ὑπὸ τῶν τραγῳδῶν λεγόμενα μασχαλίσματα
.
mvp-comment-267-9
κἀπὶ λουτροῖσιν
428
mvp-comment-267-10
ἐξέμαξ ν
429
mvp-comment-267-11
ἆρα μὴ
430
mvp-comment-268-1
οὐκ ἔστιν
431
mvp-comment-268-2
ταῦτα μὲν μέθες· σὺ δὲ
432
mvp-comment-269-1
βοστρύχων ἄκρας φόβας
433
mvp-comment-269-2
κἀμοῦ ταλαίνης
434
mvp-comment-270-1
†ἀλιπαρῆ
435
λιπαρῆ
436
mvp-comment-270-2
We come, therefore, to a dilemma. (1) The words
τήνδ’ ἀλιπαρῆ τρίχα
may conceal some corruption:
τήνδ’
ought possibly to be
τήνδε τ’
437
ἀλίπαρον
438
mvp-comment-270-3
(2) Or else, if the text be sound,
ἀλιπαρῆ
may mean
οὐ λιπαράν
. There is no doubt that
λιπ
, ‘fat,’ is the root both of
λι^παρός
, ‘shining,’ and of
λι—παρής
, ‘sticking’; cp.
Plat.
Crat. 427 B
τὸ λιπαρὸν καὶ τὸ κολλῶδες
(
Curt.
Etym. § 340
). Similarly
γλίσχρος
, ‘sticky,’ came to mean ‘importunate.’ It is barely possible that, in coining a new negative compound, the poet may have transferred the sense of
λιπαρός
to
λιπαρής
: but it seems improbable.
mvp-comment-271-1
ζῶμα
439
mvp-comment-271-2
χλιδαῖς
440
mvp-comment-272-1
προσπίτνουσα
441
αὐτὸν
442
mvp-comment-273-1
ἐξ ὑπερτέρας χερός
443
mvp-comment-273-2
ζῶντ’
444
mvp-comment-274-1
ἀφνεωτέραις
445
mvp-comment-274-2
στέφωμεν
446
mvp-comment-274-3
δωρούμεθα
447
mvp-comment-275-1
οἶμαι μὲν οὖν
448
mvp-comment-275-2
If
μέλον
449
μέλειν
450
μέλον
451
mvp-comment-276-1
σοί
452
mvp-comment-277-1
βροτῶν
453
mvp-comment-278-1
πρὸς εὐσέβειαν
454
mvp-comment-279-1
δράσω
455
mvp-comment-279-2
τὸ γὰρ δίκαιον
456
mvp-comment-279-3
(1)
τὸ δίκαιον
is an acc. of general reference, and
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
is impersonal. ‘With regard to what is (clearly) right, it is unreasonable for two persons to dispute; rather both should hasten on the doing (of it).’ With
ἀλλ’ ἐπισπεύδειν
we supply the notion
δεῖ
from the negative
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
(as from
οὐκ ἔξεστι
in
O. C. 1402
ff.; cp.
O. T. 817
ff.). For the form of the sentence, cp.
H. 7. 3. 7
τοὺς περὶ Ἀρχίαν...οὐ ψῆφον ἀνεμείνατε, ἀλλὰ ὁπότε πρῶτον ἐδυνάσθητε ἐτιμωρήσασθε
. So here the acc.
τὸ δίκαιον
, which represents the object of
δρᾶν
, is separated from it by the parenthesis
οὐκ
ἔχει λόγον δυοῖν ἐρίζειν
. (The first scholium gives substantially this view:
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον φιλονεικεῖν περὶ τοῦ δικαίου, ὥστε περὶ αὐτοῦ δύο ὄντας ἐρίζειν
.)
mvp-comment-279-4
(2) Or
τὸ δίκαιον
might be nom.: ‘that which is clearly right does not
afford any ground (
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
) for two persons to dispute,’ etc. So the second schol.:
ἢ τὸ οὐκ ἔχει λόγον ἀντὶ τοῦ οὐ παρέχει πρόφασιν
. So far as the verb
ἔχει
is concerned, this sense is quite admissible: cp.
Thuc. 2. 41
οὔτε τῷ πολεμίῳ ἐπελθόντι ἀγανάκτησιν ἔχει
(
ἡ πόλις
). The objection is that the phrases
ἔχειν λόγον, οὐκ ἔχειν λόγον
, which are very common, regularly mean, ‘to be reasonable,’ ‘to be unreasonable.’ This is so both in the personal and in the impersonal constr.; as Plat.
Phaedop. 62 D
τὸ γὰρ μὴ ἀγανακτεῖν...οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
:
Dem. or. 36 § 54
πῶς ἔχει λόγον σὲ...δίκην ἀξιοῦν λαμβάνειν
; The supposed sense, ‘not to
afford a reason,’ is unexampled.
mvp-comment-279-5
δυοῖν
457
mvp-comment-280-1
παρ’ ὑμῶν
458
mvp-comment-281-1
πικρὰν
459
δοκῶ με … τολμήσειν
460
ἔτι
461
mvp-comment-282-1
εἰ μὴ )γὼ
462
mvp-comment-282-2
γνώμας λειπομένα
463
mvp-comment-283-1
ἁ πρόμαντις Δίκα
464
mvp-comment-283-2
δίκαια φερομένα χεροῖν κράτη
465
mvp-comment-284-1
μέτεισιν
466
mvp-comment-284-2
οὐ μακροῦ χρόνου
467
mvp-comment-285-1
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
468
κλύουσαν
469
mvp-comment-285-2
ἁδυπνόων … ὀνειράτων
470
mvp-comment-286-1
ἀμναστεῖ γ’ ὁ φύσας ς’
471
mvp-comment-287-1
χαλκόπλακτος
472
mvp-comment-287-2
γένυς
473
mvp-comment-287-3
The very axe (
φόνιος πέλεκυς
, 99) with which the blow was dealt is imagined as nourishing a grudge against the murderers who had set it such a task. Such a personification recalls that practice of Athenian law by which inanimate objects which had caused death were brought to a formal trial in the court called
τὸ ἐπὶ Πρυτανείῳ
, and, after sentence, cast beyond the boundaries, in the presence of the Archon Basileus and the sacrificial officers of the tribes (
φυλο‐
βασιλεῖς
). Aeschin. or. 3 § 244
τὰ μὲν ξύλα καὶ τοὺς λίθους καὶ τὸν σίδηρον, τὰ ἄφωνα καὶ ἀγνώμονα, ἐάν τῳ ἐμπεσόντα ἀποκτείνῃ, ὑπερορίζομεν
. (Cp.
Dem. or. 23 § 76
.) A like conception was implied in the English law (repealed in 1846) of ‘deodands’ (Deo danda),
i.e., personal chattels (whether animals or things) which, having caused the death of a human being, were forfeited to the Crown for pious uses.
mvp-comment-288-1
ἐν αἰκίαις
474
mvp-comment-289-1
καὶ πολύπους καὶ πολύχειρ
475
mvp-comment-290-1
λόχοις
476
mvp-comment-290-2
χαλκόπους
477
mvp-comment-291-1
ἄλεκτρ’ ἄνυμφα
478
mvp-comment-291-2
γάμων ἁμιλλήμαθ’
479
mvp-comment-291-3
ἐπέβα
480
mvp-comment-292-1
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι … συνδρῶσιν
481
mvp-comment-292-2
Verses 495—497 (
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι...τέρας
) answer metrically to vv. 479—481
ὕπεστί μοι...ὀνειράτων
, where the text is certain, save for the doubt whether
θράσος
or
θάρσος
should stand in 479. Here we must first decide two points.
mvp-comment-292-3
(1) Are the words
πρὸ τῶνδε
482
mvp-comment-292-4
(2) Could
ἔχει με, μήποτε τέρας πελᾶν
(etc.) mean, ‘
the belief possesses me, that’ etc.? Surely not. No real parallel for so strange a phrase has been produced. It is irrelevant to quote those impersonal verbs which directly express the
occurrence of a thought to the mind; as
Xen.
An. 6. 1. 17
εἰσῄει αὐτοὺς ὅπως ἂν καὶ ἔχοντές τι οἴκαδε ἀφίκοιντο
(‘the thought came to them, how they might,’ etc.):
Thuc. 6. 78.
§ 1
εἰ δέ τῳ ἄρα παρέστηκε, τὸν μὲν Συρακόσιον...πολέμιον εἶναι κ.τ.λ.
Either, then, the subject to
ἔχει
has dropped out, or the words
μ’ ἔχει
conceal a corruption.
mvp-comment-292-5
The following remedies are possible: I incline to the first, as involving least change. (1) Reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
, we may read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοί μ’ ἔχει
|
<θάρσος τι>, μήποθ’ ἡμῖν
etc. (It may be remarked that
τι
is in harmony with the tone of
ὕπεστί μοι
in 479.) Another available word is
ξύννοια
(cp.
Ant. 279
). (2) Or, reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θάρσος
, we could read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι θάρσος ἴσχει με
. On either view, the
υ
of
ἁδυπνόων
in 480 is long (as several critics have assumed). It should be noted that (1) involves a different constitution of the verses: see p. lxxxii.
mvp-comment-292-6
In those MSS. which have
μή ποτε μή ποθ’ ἡμῖν
483
mvp-comment-293-1
ἀψεγές
484
ἀψεφές
485
mvp-comment-293-2
πελᾶν
486
mvp-comment-294-1
τοῖς δρῶσι
487
τοῖς συνδρῶσιν
488
mvp-comment-295-1
μαντεῖαι βροτῶν
489
mvp-comment-296-1
εὖ κατασχήσει
490
mvp-comment-297-1
ἱππεία
491
mvp-comment-297-2
Oenomaüs, king of Pisa in Elis, had promised the hand of his daughter Hippodameia to the suitor who should defeat him in a chariot-race; the penalty of failure being death. The young Pelops, son of Tantalus, offered himself as a competitor. Myrtilus, the charioteer of Oenomaüs, was persuaded (either by Hippodameia or by Pelops) to betray his master. He did so by leaving out one or both of the linch-pins by which the naves of the chariot-wheels were secured to the axles.
Tzetzes on Lycophron 156
ταῖς χοινίκισι
(=
πλήμναις
, the naves)
τῶν τροχῶν οὐκ ἐμβαλὼν τοὺς ἥλους
. According to another story, he substituted a linch-pin of wax for a real one (
schol. Apoll. Rh. 752
ἐμβαλόντα κήρινον ἔμβολον ἐπὶ τοῦ ἀκραξονίου
). So Pelops won the race, and the bride. But Oenomaüs was soon avenged on the traitor; for Myrtilus insulted Hippodameia, and was thrown into the sea by Pelops; upon whose house he invoked a curse, as he sank.
mvp-comment-297-3
Euripides, too, (
Or. 990
ff.,
Helen. 386 f.) refers to this chariot-race as the event with which the troubles of the Pelopidae began. Apollonius Rhodius briefly describes the critical moment of the race as one of the subjects embroidered on the cloak of Jason (1. 752 ff.); there Oenomaüs was seen, ‘falling sideways, as the axle broke at the naves of the wheels,’—
ἄξονος ἐν πλήμνῃσι παρακλιδὸν ἀγνυμένοιο
|
πίπτεν
.
mvp-comment-297-4
The eastern pediment of the temple of Zeus at Olympia (
circ. 450 B.C.) was adorned with sculptures by Paeonius, representing the preparation for this contest (
Paus. 5. 10. 6
). The fragments found on the site have sufficed for a reconstruction of the group. Zeus occupied the centre; to the right of him were Pelops and Hippodameia; to the left, Oenomaüs and his wife Steropè. On each side was a chariot drawn by four horses. Myrtilus was sitting in front of his team, with his face turned away from his master.
mvp-comment-297-5
In the older and nobler form of the myth, Pelops won, not by a fraud, but by the grace of Poseidon, who gave him winged horses (Pindar
O. 1. 87
ἔδωκεν δίφρον τε χούσεον πτεροῖσίν τ’ ἀκάμαντας ἵππους
). On the chest (
λάρναξ
) of Cypselus, seen by Pausanias in the Heraeum at Olympia (
Paus. 5. 17. 5
), Pelops was driving two winged horses.
mvp-comment-298-1
αἰανὴς
492
mvp-comment-298-2
The form
αἰανὴς
has the best authority, and some critics hold that
αἰανὸς
(Hesych.) was a Byzantine invention. But in
Aesch.
Eum. 416
,
ἡμεῖς γάρ ἐσμεν νυκτὸς αἰανῆς τέκνα
(so L, schol., and Tzetzes on Lycophron 406),
αἰανῆ
is far less suitable.
mvp-comment-299-1
εὖτε
493
mvp-comment-299-2
ὁ ποντισθεὶς Μυρτίλος
494
mvp-comment-299-3
A vase found at Capua shows Pelops and Hippodameia in a ship, from which Myrtilus is falling backwards into the water. A winged Erinys hovers in the air above, brandishing a sword over the head of Pelops (Baumeister,
Denkmäler p. 1204, referring to
Mon. Inst. x. 25).
mvp-comment-299-4
ἐκοιμάθη
495
mvp-comment-300-1
παγχρυσέων δίφρων
496
mvp-comment-301-1
πρόρριζος
497
mvp-comment-301-2
ἐκριφθείς
498
mvp-comment-302-1
ἔλειπεν
499
ἔλιπεν
500
οἴκου
501
οἴκους
502
πω
503
mvp-comment-303-1
πολύπονος
504
αἰκία
505
mvp-comment-304-1
ἀνειμένη
506
μέν
507
mvp-comment-304-2
ὡς ἔοικας
508
mvp-comment-304-3
στρέφει
509
mvp-comment-304-4
Clytaemnestra begins in the same strain as Chrysothemis, who likewise emphasised her reproof by the word
αὖ
510
mvp-comment-305-1
μή τοι θυραίαν γ’
511
mvp-comment-305-2
αἰσχύνειν φίλους
512
mvp-comment-306-1
καίτοι
513
mvp-comment-306-2
δὴ
514
πολλούς
515
mvp-comment-306-3
ἐξεῖπάς με … ὡς
516
mvp-comment-306-4
θρασεῖα
517
τραχεῖα
518
mvp-comment-306-5
ἄρχω
519
mvp-comment-307-1
ὕβριν … οὐκ ἔχω
520
κακῶς κλύουσα
521
mvp-comment-308-1
πατὴρ γάρ
522
mvp-comment-308-2
πρόσχημα
523
mvp-comment-309-1
ἡ γὰρ Δίκη
524
mvp-comment-310-1
ᾗ χρῆν σ’ ἀρήγειν
525
mvp-comment-311-1
The order of words in the MSS.,
ἐπεὶ πατὴρ οὗτος σός
, is probably right; the words would then fall from her with a certain deliberate bitterness.
Cp. 542
:
Ant. 44
ἦ γὰρ νοεῖς θάπτειν σθ’
(n.):
Ph. 101
λέγω σ’ ἐγὼ δόλῳ Φιλοκτήτην λαβεῖν
.
mvp-comment-312-1
μοῦνος
526
Ἑλλήνων
527
mvp-comment-312-2
Nauck requires
τὴν αὐτὸς αὑτοῦ
instead of
τὴν σὴν ὅμαιμον
, because Agamemnon's unique crime was the slaughter of his own child: as if the text did not convey this. Clytaemnestra means, ‘while mourning a father, you forget a sister.’
mvp-comment-312-3
532 f. The regular mode of expression would be,
οὐκ ἴσον λύπης καμὼν ἐμοί, ὁ σπείρας τῇ τικτούσῃ
. But, having written
ὅτ’ ἔσπειρε
, the poet explains
ἐμοί
by repeating the comparison in a new form,
ὥσπερ ἡ τίκτουσ’ ἐγώ
. (For
ὡς
or
ὥσπερ
after
ἴσος
, cp.
Lys. or. 19 § 36
ἡγοῦντο... τὰ ἐκεῖ...εἶναι ἴσα ὥσπερ τὰ ἐνθάδε
.) Those who reject v. 533 omit to notice that, without it, the words
οὐκ ἴσον καμὼν ἐμοί
would be unintelligible. Cp.
Aesch.
Ag. 1417
ἔθυσεν αὑτοῦ παῖδα, φιλτάτην ἐμοὶ
|
ὠδῖν’
.
mvp-comment-312-4
This assertion of the mother's superior claim is a counterpart to the doctrine of Athena in
Aesch.
Eum. 658
f.,
οὐκ ἔστι μήτηρ ἡ κεκλημένου τέκνου
|
τοκεύς, τροφὸς δὲ κύματος νεοσπόρου
. Cp. above,
Aesch. Eum. 366
n.
mvp-comment-313-1
τοῦ χάριν, τίνων
528
mvp-comment-313-2
The alternative, which most editors have preferred, is to take
τίνων
as the participle. But there is an insuperable objection to this, which seems to have escaped notice. The words,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could mean only, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
for what?’ They could not mean, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
to whom?’ The latter would be
τῷ χάριν τίνων
; See (
e.g.)
Aesch.
P. V. 985
καὶ μὴν ὀφείλων ἂν τίνοιμ’ αὐτῷ χάριν
:
Aesch.
Ag. 821
τούτων θεοῖσι χρὴ πολύμνηστον χάριν
|
τίνειν
. Hence the question,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could not possibly be answered by
Ἀργείων
. For, evidently, the latter word could not mean, (‘for a benefit conferred by) the Greeks.’ A scholiast in the Baroccian MS. (cr. n. on 545), who explains
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
by
τίνος χάριν ἀποδιδούς
, plainly meant, ‘showing gratitude for what?’—and his paraphrase was correct; only he overlooked the context.
mvp-comment-314-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ μετῆν
529
mvp-comment-315-1
ἀλλ’ ἀντ’ ἀδελφοῦ δῆτα
530
κτανὼν
531
mvp-comment-315-2
ἀντὶ ἀδελφοῦ
532
mvp-comment-315-3
τἄμ’
533
mvp-comment-316-1
παῖδες … διπλοῖ
534
mvp-comment-316-2
540 f. Nauck would prefer a single verse in place of these two, viz.
οὓς Ἰφιγενείας εἰκὸς ἦν θνῄσκειν πάρος
.
mvp-comment-317-1
ἢ
535
mvp-comment-317-2
ἢ τῶν ἐμῶν Ἅιδης
536
mvp-comment-318-1
δαίσασθαι
537
mvp-comment-318-2
The conj.
λῄσασθαι
538
mvp-comment-319-1
πανώλει
539
mvp-comment-319-2
παρεῖτο
540
mvp-comment-319-3
The sense does not absolutely require us to take
Μενέλεω δ’
541
mvp-comment-320-1
ἀβούλου
542
mvp-comment-320-2
κακοῦ γνώμην
543
mvp-comment-321-1
δοκῶ μέν
544
mvp-comment-321-2
εἰ καὶ
545
mvp-comment-322-1
εἰ φωνὴν λάβοι
546
mvp-comment-323-1
τοῖς πεπραγμένοις
547
mvp-comment-324-1
γνώμην δικαίαν σχοῦσα
548
mvp-comment-325-1
ἐρεῖς μὲν οὐχὶ
549
ἐρεῖς
550
ἐρεῖς … μ’ ὡς
551
mvp-comment-325-2
ἄρξασά τι λυπηρὸν
552
mvp-comment-325-3
τάδ’ ἐξήκους’
553
mvp-comment-326-1
τοῦ τεθνηκότος θ’ ὕπερ
554
mvp-comment-327-1
καὶ μὴν
555
mvp-comment-327-2
λόγους ἐξῆρχές με
556
mvp-comment-328-1
Clytaemnestra has argued that she was justified in slaying Agamemnon, because he had slain Iphigeneia. The topics of Electra's reply are as follows.
mvp-comment-328-2
(1) 558—562. The wife who slew her husband would be a criminal, even if the motive had been just retribution; but the real motive was her love for Aegisthus. (2) 563—576. Agamemnon was not a free agent in slaying Iphigeneia; the act was forced upon him by Artemis. (3) 577—583. Suppose, however, that he was a free agent, and wished to please his brother; still she was not justified in taking his life. (4) 584—594. And in any case her plea does not excuse her for living with the man who helped to slay her husband.—The speech then closes in a strain of reproach and defiance (595 —609).
mvp-comment-328-3
καὶ δὴ λέγω σοι
557
πατέρα
558
φὴς
559
mvp-comment-329-1
εἴτ’ οὖν … εἴτε
560
mvp-comment-329-2
λέξω
561
δείξω
562
mvp-comment-330-1
ὡς οὐ δίκῃ γ’
563
ἔσπασεν
564
πειθὼ
565
mvp-comment-331-1
κυναγὸν
566
mvp-comment-331-2
ποινὰς
567
mvp-comment-331-3
τὰ πολλὰ πνεύματ’ ἔσχ’
568
τὰ πολλὰ
569
ἔσχε
570
mvp-comment-331-4
Acc. to Aesch. (
Aesch.
Ag. 149
f.,
Aesch. Ag. 192
), the Greeks were detained by
adverse winds, blowing from the N.E. : and this seems to have been the account given in the
Cypria (
c. 776 B.C.), Proclus
Chrest. p. 455:
ἐπέσχεν αὐτοὺς τοῦ πλοῦ χειμῶνας ἐπιπέμπουσα
. But other authorities speak of a
calm. Thus
I. A. 9 ff.
οὔκουν φθόγγος γ’ οὔτ’ ὀρνίθων
|
οὔτε θαλάσσης· σιγαὶ δ’ ἀνέμων
|
τόνδε κατ’ Εὔριπον ἔχουσιν
. Schol.
Eur.
Or. 647
ἐπειράθη τῆς θεοῦ ὀργιζομένης καὶ κατεχούσης τοὺς ἀνέμους
. Tzetzes on Lycophron 183
χολωθεῖσα δ’ ἐπὶ τούτῳ ἡ θεὸς τοὺς ἀνέμους κατέσχεν
. Ovid (
Met. 13. 183
) combines both versions:
exspectata diu, nulla aut contraria classi | Flamina sunt.
mvp-comment-331-5
It has been objected that vessels provided with oars need not have been detained by a calm. But the ships of the Greek fleet were not light craft. Each carried from 50 to 120 armed men, besides
σκεύη πολεμικά
: and the warriors were also the rowers (cp.
Thuc. 1. 10
). It is intelligible, then, that they should await the aid of wind before attempting the passage of the Aegaean. We must remember, too, the strong and shifting currents in the Euripus (
στονόεντα πορθμόν
,
Soph.
Ant. 1145
:
παλιρρόχθοις ἐν Αὐλίδος τόποις
,
Aesch.
Ag. 191
).
mvp-comment-331-6
We cannot well render:—(1)‘He
suffered those tedious winds,’—supplying
ὁ πατήρ
from v. 558. Nor: (2) ‘She
directed those tedious winds at Aulis,’—a version which would at least require
ἐπ’ Αὐλίδι
. Cp.
Ph. 1119
ἔχε
|
δύσποτμον ἀρὰν ἐπ’ ἄλλοις
.
mvp-comment-331-7
The conjecture
πλοῖα
571
mvp-comment-331-8
Αὐλίδι
572
mvp-comment-332-1
ἢ )γὼ φράσω
573
κείνης
574
mvp-comment-333-1
ὡς ἐγὼ κλύω
575
mvp-comment-333-2
θεᾶς … κατ’ ἄλσος
576
mvp-comment-333-3
παίζων
577
mvp-comment-333-4
ποδοῖν
578
mvp-comment-334-1
ἔλαφον
579
mvp-comment-334-2
στικτὸν
580
mvp-comment-334-3
κεράστην
581
mvp-comment-334-4
οὗ κατὰ σφαγὰς
582
mvp-comment-335-1
ἐκκομπάσας ἔπος τι τυγχάνει
583
βαλών
584
mvp-comment-335-2
This is the reason against taking
τυγχάνει
with
βαλών
, as=‘he shoots and hits’; cp.
Il. 15. 581
θηρητὴρ ἐτύχησε βαλών
:
Her. 3. 35
εἰ...τοῦ παιδὸς...βαλὼν τύχοιμι
. The vaunt must then
precede the hit.
mvp-comment-335-3
Others take
βαλὼν
585
ἔπος
586
mvp-comment-335-4
Monk, with Musgrave, took
σφαγὰς
587
mvp-comment-336-1
ἐκ τοῦδε
588
mvp-comment-336-2
μηνίσασα
589
mvp-comment-336-3
Λητῴα κόρη
590
mvp-comment-337-1
ὡς
591
ἀντίσταθμον
592
mvp-comment-337-2
ἐκθύσειε
593
mvp-comment-338-1
ὧδ’ ἦν
594
mvp-comment-338-2
τὰ … θύματ’
595
mvp-comment-338-3
λύσις
596
mvp-comment-338-4
πρὸς οἶκον
597
mvp-comment-339-1
πολλὰ
598
mvp-comment-339-2
ἀντιβὰς
599
mvp-comment-339-3
μόλις
600
mvp-comment-340-1
εἰ δ’ οὖν
601
mvp-comment-340-2
ἐρῶ γὰρ καὶ τὸ σόν
602
mvp-comment-341-1
τούτου … οὕνεκ’
603
mvp-comment-341-2
νόμῳ
604
mvp-comment-342-1
ὅρα
605
μὴ … τιθῇς
606
τίθης
607
mvp-comment-342-2
Here, either
τίθης
or
τιθῇς
would be suitable. (1) With
τίθης
:—‘See that, in making this rule, you
are not making woe for yourself.’ This means that to make the rule (as she is doing) is at once (logically) to make the woe. (2) With
τιθῇς
: —‘See
lest, in making this rule, you
make woe for yourself’:
i.e., the rule may have the woe as a consequence. The woe is a future contingency (583
εἰ δίκης γε τυγχάνοις
), against which Electra warns her. On the whole, I now prefer
τιθῇς
.
Cp. 1003
ὅρα κακῶς πράσσοντε μὴ μείζω κακὰ
|
κτησώμεθ’
: fr. 82
ἀλλ’ ὅρα μὴ κρεῖσσον ᾖ
.
mvp-comment-342-3
τιθεῖσα … νόμον
608
mvp-comment-343-1
εἰ γὰρ κτενοῦμεν
609
mvp-comment-343-2
πρώτη
610
mvp-comment-344-1
εἰσόρα
611
mvp-comment-344-2
οὐκ οὖσαν
612
mvp-comment-344-3
τίθης
613
mvp-comment-344-4
εἰ … θέλεις
614
mvp-comment-345-1
τῷ παλαμναίῳ
615
mvp-comment-345-2
πρόσθεν ἐξαπώλεσας
616
mvp-comment-346-1
παιδοποιεῖς
617
mvp-comment-346-2
Erigonè, daughter of Aegisthus and Clytaemnestra (Tzetzes on
Lyc. 1374
), was mentioned by the early cyclic poet Cinaethon (
Paus. 2. 18. 6
), and was the theme of Sophocles in his
Ἠριγόνη
. Hyginus (
Hyg.
Fab. 122
) notices a son of Aegisthus named Aletes, who gives his name to a play by Sophocles, but does not record the mother: see p. xliii note 4.
mvp-comment-346-3
εὐσεβεῖς
618
mvp-comment-346-4
κἀξ εὐσεβῶν
619
mvp-comment-346-5
By
τοὺς...πρόσθεν εὐσεβεῖς
Electra means Orestes and herself. Both are ‘cast out’ of their just rights. Cp.
O.T. 611
φίλον ...ἐσθλὸν ἐκβαλεῖν
.
Eur.
El. 62
τεκοῦσα δ’ ἄλλους παῖδας Αἰγίσθῳ πάρα
|
πάρεργ’ Ὀρέστην κἀμὲ ποιεῖται δόμων.
mvp-comment-346-6
βλαστόντας
620
mvp-comment-346-7
ἐκβαλοῦσ’ ἔχεις
621
mvp-comment-347-1
πῶς ταῦτ’ ἐπαινέσαιμ’ ἄν
622
mvp-comment-347-2
ἢ
623
ἦ
624
καὶ τοῦτ’
625
ἄποινα
626
mvp-comment-348-1
αἰσχρῶς δ’
627
δ’
628
mvp-comment-348-2
ἐάν περ καὶ λέγῃς
629
mvp-comment-348-3
ἐχθροῖς γαμεῖσθαι
630
mvp-comment-348-4
These two verses, though not indispensable, seem genuine. Were they omitted, the transition from 592 to 595 would be somewhat abrupt.
mvp-comment-349-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ γὰρ
631
mvp-comment-349-2
πᾶσαν ἵης γλῶσσαν
632
mvp-comment-350-1
κακοστομοῦμεν
633
mvp-comment-350-2
καί σ’ ἔγωγε δεσπότιν
634
mvp-comment-350-3
εἰς ἡμᾶς
635
ἣ
636
mvp-comment-351-1
βίον μοχθηρόν
637
mvp-comment-351-2
ἔκ τε σοῦ
638
κακοῖς … ξυνοῦσα
639
mvp-comment-351-3
συννόμου
640
mvp-comment-352-1
ὁ δ’ ἄλλος
641
mvp-comment-352-2
χεῖρα σὴν
642
mvp-comment-352-3
τρίβει βίον
643
mvp-comment-352-4
603 The reason for writing
δή με σοὶ
644
δή μέ σοι
645
mvp-comment-352-5
μιάστορα
646
mvp-comment-353-1
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκα
647
mvp-comment-354-1
εἰς ἅπαντας
648
mvp-comment-354-2
χρῇς
649
mvp-comment-354-3
στόμαργον
650
mvp-comment-355-1
τῶνδε τῶν ἔ|ργων ἴδρις
651
mvp-comment-355-2
σχεδόν τι
652
mvp-comment-355-3
οὐ καταισχύνω
653
mvp-comment-356-1
ὁρῶ μένος πνέουσαν
654
μένος πνέουσαν
655
mvp-comment-356-2
σὺν δίκῃ ξύνεστι
656
mvp-comment-356-3
Other interpretations are:—(1) ‘I see that Electra is wroth; but as to whether she is in the right, I see no concern (anywhere),’—a timid way of saying that
Clytaemnestra shows no such concern. So the schol. (2) ‘I see that Clytaemnestra is angry, but not that she cares whether she is right’:—an inference from some gesture. Both these versions rely on the fact that
φροντίδος
(612) is plainly an echo of
φροντίδ’
(611). But: (
a) it does not follow that
φροντίδ’
is not
Electra's thought. (
b) It is surely clear that
πνέουσαν
must be Electra; and (
c) as in
Ant. 471
f., the second clause naturally refers to the same person.
mvp-comment-357-1
ποίας δ’ ἐμοὶ δεῖ
657
ἐμοὶ
658
μοι
659
δεῖ
660
mvp-comment-357-2
Others understand: (1) ‘If Electra has no consideration for justice, why should I have any consideration for her,—
i.e., show her any tenderness?’ Or: (2) ‘If she heeds not justice, why should I heed her?’ Neither view seems well suited to the context.
mvp-comment-358-1
καὶ ταῦτα
661
mvp-comment-358-2
τηλικοῦτος
662
mvp-comment-358-3
ἆρα
663
mvp-comment-358-4
χωρεῖν ἂν
664
εἰς πᾶν ἔργον
665
mvp-comment-359-1
εὖ νυν ἐπίστω
666
mvp-comment-359-2
ἔξωρα
667
mvp-comment-359-3
προσεικότα
668
mvp-comment-360-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
669
mvp-comment-360-2
ἡ … ἐκ σοῦ δυσμένεια
670
mvp-comment-360-3
ἐξαναγκάζει
671
αἰσχροῖς
672
mvp-comment-360-4
622 f. The word
θρέμμα
673
mvp-comment-360-5
ἦ σ’ ἐγὼ
674
mvp-comment-361-1
νιν
675
mvp-comment-361-2
εὑρίσκεται
676
mvp-comment-361-3
Cp. Milton,
Apology for Smectymnuus (in his
Prose Works, ed. Symmons, vol. I. p. 236): ‘I might also tell them [the prelates], what Electra in Sophocles, a wise virgin, answered her wicked mother, who thought herself too violently reproved by her the daughter: ‘'
Tis you that say it,
not I; you do the deeds, |
And your ungodly deeds find me the words.’’
mvp-comment-362-1
οὐ μὰ
677
mvp-comment-362-2
δέσποιναν
678
mvp-comment-362-3
Ἄρτεμιν
679
mvp-comment-362-4
θράσους τοῦδ’ οὐκ ἀλύξεις
680
μόλῃ
681
mvp-comment-363-1
ὁρᾷς
682
mvp-comment-363-2
ἐκφέρει
683
mvp-comment-363-3
The
v. l.
παρεῖσα
684
mvp-comment-364-1
οὐδὲ
685
mvp-comment-364-2
ὑπ’ εὐφήμου βοῆς
686
mvp-comment-364-3
ἐπειδὴ σοί γ’
687
mvp-comment-364-4
πᾶν λέγειν
688
mvp-comment-365-1
κελεύω
689
mvp-comment-365-2
τοὐμὸν στόμ’
690
mvp-comment-365-3
634 f. An altar, and probably an image, of Apollo stand before the palace. The attendant of Clytaemnestra carries offerings of various fruits, which she is now commanded to
raise, as with a gesture of solemn oblation (
ἔπαιρε
691
mvp-comment-365-4
ἡ παροῦσά μοι
692
mvp-comment-365-5
θύματα … πάγκαρπα
693
mvp-comment-366-1
λυτηρίους … δειμάτων
694
mvp-comment-366-2
ἀνάσχω
695
mvp-comment-367-1
κλύοις ἂν
696
mvp-comment-367-2
προστατήριε
697
mvp-comment-368-1
κεκρυμμένην
698
mvp-comment-368-2
οὐ γὰρ ἐν φίλοις
699
mvp-comment-369-1
πρὸς φῶς
700
mvp-comment-370-1
πολυγλώσσῳ
701
mvp-comment-370-2
σπείρῃ
702
mvp-comment-370-3
ματαίαν
703
mvp-comment-371-1
ὧδ’
704
mvp-comment-372-1
γὰρ
705
mvp-comment-372-2
δισσῶν ὀνείρων
706
mvp-comment-372-3
Jacobs Fr.(
ap. Wunder) understood, ‘
two dreams,’—as if Clyt.'s vision consisted of two parts,—the return of Agamemnon, and the growth from the sceptre (417—423). This seems forced. Still less can we assume that there was some second dream which Clyt. did not relate even to the Sun-god (425).
mvp-comment-372-4
Λύκεἰ ἄναξ
707
mvp-comment-373-1
ἐσθλά … ἐχθρά
708
mvp-comment-373-2
Cp.
Aesch.
Pers. 217
, where the Chorus are advising Atossa how to propitiate the gods after her dream:
εἴ τι φλαῦρον εἶδες, αἰτοῦ τῶνδ’ ἀποτροπὴν τελεῖν
, |
τὰ δ’ ἀγάθ’ ἐκτελῆ γενέσθαι σοί τε καὶ τέκνῳ σέθεν κ.τ.λ.
mvp-comment-373-3
ἔμπαλιν μέθες
709
mvp-comment-374-1
εἴ τινες
710
mvp-comment-375-1
ἀλλ’ ὧδε
711
mvp-comment-375-2
ἀβλαβεῖ βίῳ
712
mvp-comment-376-1
δόμους
713
mvp-comment-376-2
ἀμφέπειν
714
mvp-comment-376-3
φίλοισι
715
mvp-comment-377-1
εὐημεροῦσαν
716
mvp-comment-377-2
καὶ τέκνων
717
ὅσων
718
mvp-comment-377-3
We might also take
τέκνων
as standing, by attraction, for
τέκνοις
. When the antecedent is thus attracted, it usually comes after the relative (
O.C. 56); but sometimes precedes it, as in
Tr. 151
f.
τότ’ ἄν τις εἰσίδοιτο
... | ...
κακοῖσιν
(for
κακά
)
ο<*>ς ἐγὼ βαρύνομαι
. In examples of the latter kind, however, the acc. (and not, as it would be here, the dat.) is elsewhere the case attracted. In favour of taking
τέκνων
as partitive, it may be added that this suits the distinction between two groups of
τέκνα
. By
ὅσων
she means Chrysothemis, Iphianassa, and the offspring o<*> her union with Aegisthus (157; 589).
mvp-comment-377-4
ἐμοὶ … πρόσεστιν
719
mvp-comment-378-1
πᾶσιν ἡμῖν
720
mvp-comment-379-1
τὰ δ’ ἄλλα πάντα
721
mvp-comment-379-2
660 Following the directions given in vv. 39 ff., the Paedagogus now appears as a
ξένος Φωκεύς
. Cp.
O.T. 924 ff., where the messenger from Corinth presents himself to Iocasta and the Chorus.
mvp-comment-379-3
πῶς ἂν εἰδείην
722