οἱ δ’ ὑπερβαίνοντες
—all who were attempting to escape, whatever they were doing, are regarded as one body; but presently they are divided into
οἱ μέν, those already on the wall, and
οἱ δέ, those who were still below. The result is a very ugly sentence.
4.
ἑκατέρου—see c.
22,
3.
τάς τε διόδους
—Steup, following Poppo, renders ‘and,’ making the parenthesis extend from
ὠς to
ἐπιβοηθεῖν, because, if
τε is regarded as correlative to
καί, the sense of
τάς τε διόδους . . ἐπιβοηθεῖν is absurdly repeated in
κάτωθεν (i.e.
ἀπὸ τῶν διόδων)
εἶργον. It will be noticed that, if
ἐφύλασσον μηδένα δῑ αὐτῶν ἐπιβοηθεῖν were absent, the sentence would be perfectly iegular in outline:
οἱ δ’ ὑπερβαίνοντες τάς τε διόδους ἐνστάντες καὶ κλίμακας προσθέντες, οἱ μὲν καὶ κάτωθεν (i.e.
ἀπὸ τῶν διόδων)
καὶ ἄνωθεν (i.e.
ἀπ’ ἄκρων τῶν πύργων )
εἶργον κτλ. I think that this is a sign, not that the interrupting words are spurious— they are quite in Thuc.'s manner—but that Thuc. wrote them without working out the sentence to its end, as if after
πλείους he had intended to continue, not with
οἱ μέν, but in the form
ἀπὸ τῶν πύργων τοὺς ἐπιβοηθοῦντας ἄνωθεν εἶργον βάλλοντες: on reaching
πλείους, he shifted his plan and as the general subject was to be kept up, bifurcated the sentenee with
οἱ μὲν . . οἱ δέ, instead of making a separate sentence of the
οἰ δέ clause. This view of the matter is confirmed by the ugly repetition of
κλίμακας προσθέντες and
πλείους in different senses.
δῑ αὐτῶν
—coming from the other
πύργοι through the passages to the
μεταπύργιον over which the P. were escaping.
πλείους
—as in c.
22,
4 init.
οἱ μέν
includes those in the
δίοδοι and those on the top of the
πύργοι.
κάτωθεν καὶ ἄνωθεν
—with
εἶργον.
οἱ δ’
—those who were at the foot of the wall.
αἰεί
—as Kruger says, this belongs to the partic, and the verb alike.
τῆς τάφρου
—for this outer trench see c.
24,
2.
παρὰ τὸ τεῖχος
—‘by the wall,’ on the outside.
κωλυτὴς γίγνοιτο
—a favourite periphrasis with Thuc., especially with nouns in
‐της; examples occur in ec.
2, 40, 58, 59; with
διδάσκαλος c.
42
; with
ἡγεμών c.
105.
πάντες
—meaning
οἱ πλείους of § 1.
οἱ τελευταῖοι
—best taken by itself, between commas, i.e. ‘as they were the last,’ like
οἱ δ’ . . οἱ πλείους above. But Steup makes
οἱ τελευταῖοι partitive apposition to
οἱ . . πύργων and joins
χαλεπῶς οἱ τελευταῖοι κ. The men on the towers waited till the rest were safely across.
τὰ γυμνά
—the unprotected side.
βιαίως
—like
βιαιότερον ἀναγαγόμενοι
II.
33,
‘hard pressed.’
οἷος ἀπηλιώτου
—sc.
ὄντος, as in
Soph.
OC. 83
ὡς
ἐμοῦ μόνης πέλας, se.
οὔσης. It is very rarely that the partic. is omitted in gen. abs where the noun does not itself suggest a partie. as in
Soph.
OT. 966
ὧν ὑφηγητῶν, sc.
ὄντων: but the omission is softened in this case by the analogy of the gen. of
time, as in
νυκτός .
ἢ βορέου
—perhaps a marginal note, intended to fill up the sense of
μᾶλλον. (It has been suggested (1) that
βορέου should be ehanged to
εὔρου, or (2) that
μᾶλλον should be transposed before
ἤ.) But possibly two propositions are eompressed into one; and the full sense is ‘as it is when the wind is east: it is, in fact, more watery then than when the wind is north.’ (So Chambry,
Rév. de phil. '97.)
ὑπονειφομένη
—ef. Herod
II.
13
ὕεται ἡ χώρη, Xen.
Hell.
II.
4,
13
νειφόμενοι ἀπῆλθον: for
ὑ. is properly ‘being thinly besnowed.’
ἐγένετο . . ἡ διάφευξις
—cf.
VII.
41
τὴν κατάφευξιν ἐποιοῦντο ‘were seeking refuge.’ The idea of
success is contained in
δια‐. (I eannot agree with Classen that
ἐγένετο here means ‘proved suceessful’: that sense is confined in Attic to old phrases like
ἐγένετο τὰ ἱερά, cf.
ἐ. τὰ διαβατήρια
V.
55.
In
VI.
74
and
VIII.
57
γίγνεσθαι=merely ‘take place.’
καὶ ἡ διάφευξις=‘the means of suecessful escape too (as well as the difficult crossing)’ was mainly owed to (i.e. more than to any other cause: meaning that it was a narrow thing).
διὰ τοῦ χειμῶνος τὸ μ.
—the order as in Herod.; cf. e.g.
I.
32
μετὰ τῆς ξυμμαχίας τῆς αἰτήσεως.