M. Tullius Cicero Pro S. Roscio Amerino 58

ed. Albert Curtis Clark

Pro S. Roscio Amerino. M. Tullius Cicero. ed. Albert Curtis Clark. Oxford. 1908.

Sponsored by Perseus Project, Tufts University.

Funding provided by National Endowment For The Humanities (NEH).

Current edition Perseus

Pro Sex. Roscio Amerino (Latin) (Cicero. M. Tulli Ciceronis Orationes, Volume 1. Clark, Albert Curtis, editor. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1908.)

Translations (1)
For Sextus Roscius of Ameria Perseus (Cicero. The Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero, Volume 1. Yonge, Charles Duke, translator. London: Bell, 1903.) — 58 focus

Notes on the current edition

Pro S. Roscio Amerino

1. ne neque ς
2. deliberaverit σχ: deliberavit cett.: deliberarit ed. V
3. illud σχψ: illum cett.
4. hoc tempore auderet ed. Mediol.

Commentary

Notes on Pro S. Roscio Amerino (Select Orations of Cicero (Allen and Greenough's Edition). Greenough, James Bradstreet; Kittredge, George Lyman, editors. Boston, London: Ginn & Company, 1897.) focus

ejus modi ,

quo uno maleficio , of such a kind, that in this one crime (rel. clause of result).

voltu , by a look.

postularet , . . .

cogebant , would compel it if the case required: see § 517 , b (308, b); cf. B. 304, 3; G. 597, R.3; H. 583, I (5

jura cogebant is equivalent to a verb of necessity, and hence the imperf. indic. in the apodosis appears with the imperf. subj. in the protasis.

auditum sit , a general condition; subj. because integral part of the result clause.

tu (emphatic), you, a professional prosecutor.

censes : the word used to express deliberate judgment, after discussion or the like.

mores , character, as resulting from habits of life;

naturam (next line), natural disposition.

tu : emphatic, as opposed to the general run of accusers. Cicero is here using the famous "argument from probability," a favorite with ancient orators and rhetoricians from the fifth century B.C. "For example, if a physically weak man be accused of an assault, he is to ask the jury, 'Is it probable that a weakling like me should have attacked anybody?' while if the accused is a strong man he is to claim that it is improbable that he should have committed an assault in a case where his strength was sure to be used as a presumption against him."