Notes on the current edition
The Attic Orators from Antiphon to Isaeos
1.
[Plut.]
Vit. Lys. The facts mentioned there may have been taken from the speech of Lysias on the motion of Archînos (
ib. § 11), and also from that
περὶ τῶν ἰδίων εὐεργεσιῶν, (quoted by Harpokration s. vv.
Κεῖοι, Φηγαιεῦσι, μεταπύργιον,) if indeed this was distinct from the former.
2.
Ἑρμᾶνι in the
Vit. Lys. § 7 ought probably to be
Ἕρμωνι, as Blass assumes,
Att. Bereds. p. 340.
3.
[Plut.]
Vit. Lys. Cf.
Xen.
Hellen. III. 2. 27
.
4.
This appears from the statement of the pseudo-Plut.
Vit. Lys. § 8, that the proposal was made
μετὰ τὴν κάθοδον ἐπ’ ἀναρχίας τῆς πρὸ Εὐκλείδου, that is, immediately after the return in the spring of the year 403. Later in the same year Eukleides became archon; and with the revival of the constitutional forms which commenced in his archonship the
ἀναρχία was held to have ended
5.
[Plut.]
Vit. Lys.
ὁ μὲν δῆμος ἐκύρωσε τὴν δωρεάν, ἀπενεγκαμένου δὲ Ἀρχίνου γραφὴν παρανόμων διὰ τὸ ἀπροβούλευτον εἰσαχθῆναι ἑάλω τὸ ψήφισμα.
6.
As by Scheibe (Blass, p 340), who thinks that the biographer assumed it from the vague allusion in Aeschin
in Ctes § 195:
Ἀρχῖνος γὰρ ὁ ἐκ Κοίλης ἐγράψατο παρανόμων Θρασύβουλον τὸν Στειριέα γράψαντά τι παρὰ τοὺς νόμους, ἕνα τῶν συγκατελθόντων αὐτῷ ἀπὸ Φύλης, καὶ εἷλε. This says only,
τι.
7.
ἔστι δ’ αὐτοῦ καὶ ὁ ὑπὲρ τοῦ ψηφίσματος (
λόγος)
ὃ ἐγράψατο Ἀρχῖνος, τὴν πολίτειαν αὐτοῦ περιελών:
Vit. Lys. § 11.
8.
See p. 151,
note 1.