Appian of Alexandria Civil Wars 2.11

Horace White (Translator)

View: By Section

Civil Wars. Appian of Alexandria. Horace White (Translator). New York. 1899.

Sponsored by Perseus Project, Tufts University.

Current edition Perseus

The Roman History: The Civil Wars (English) (Appianus. The Roman History of Appian of Alexandria, Volume 2: The Civil Wars. White, Horace, translator. New York: The Macmillan Company. London: Macmillan and Co. Ltd. 1899.)

Editions (1)
Ἐμφυλίων Πρώτη Perseus (Appianus. Appiani Historia Romana, Volume 2. Mendelssohn, Ludwig, editor. Leipzig: Teubner, 1881.) — 2.11 focus

Notes on the current edition

Civil Wars

1. Πρὸς ἄνδρα ἕνα λῃστεύοντα τὴν ἡγεμονίαν. This might be translated in the words of Hamlet: The cutpurse of the empire and the rule.
2. Caesar’s speech, as given in his own Commentaries, bears no resemblance to this. He exhorted the army to battle, he says, according to the military custom, and spoke of the kindness he had shown them at all times, and especially reminded them, as the soldiers themselves could bear witness, with what earnestness he had sought for peace, what efforts he had made in his conference with Vatinius, what he had endeavored to do in the negotiation with Scipio through Aulus Claudius, and how he had labored with Libo at Oricum for the privilege of sending legates. He said that he never willingly shed the blood of his soldiers, and that it was not his wish that the republic should lose one of its armies. Having spoken thus he gave the signal by trumpet to the soldiers, who were eagerly awaiting it and burning with zeal for the battle. (iii. go.) Suetonius, Florus, and Lucan mention Caesar’s appeal to his soldiers to spare their fellow-citizens in the pursuit, but Florus says it was intended only for effect. Lucan refers to Caesar’s order to demolish the fortifications of his camp before the battle. ( Pharsalia, vii. 326.)
3. This is a Greek proverb found in Homer, Herodotus, and several other authors, cited by Combes-Dounous, and also in Liddell and Scott’s lexicon under ξυρόν.
4. This is a strange blunder, and is inconsistent with the author’s own account of Pompey’s subsequent movements. A few lines below he says that after the line of battle was formed each commander moved about among the ranks encouraging his men, and in Sec. 81 he says that when Pompey saw the flight of his men he slowly retired to his camp. Caesar says that Pompey commanded the left wing of his army in person. Plutarch says he commanded the right wing. Of course Caesar’s testimony is to be preferred.
5. Caesar’s account of this manœuvre is as follows: Fearing lest his right wing should be surrounded by the greater number of the enemy’s horse he rapidly withdrew from the third line one cohort from each legion, and from these formed a fourth line and ranged them in opposition to the enemy’s cavalry and explained what he wished them to do and admonished them that the success of this day depended on their valor. (iii. 89.) He says nothing about aiming at the faces of the enemy. It is mentioned by Plutarch, by Lucan, and by Florus, but is probably a fable.
6. This is a chapter of moralizing quite unusual in the writings of Appian. The view which he takes of this war, that it was merely a contest between two ambitious chieftains, instead of being one incident in a long struggle between a corrupt oligarchy and a debased democracy, was commonly held by men of letters until comparatively recent times.
7. The text says Caesar’s horse, but Schweighäuser considers this a manifest error since Appian, in Sec. 79, says that it was the tenth legion that struck Pompey’s left flank. Caesar himself says that the six cohorts in reserve executed this decisive movement. At all events it could not have been Caesar’s horse.
8. There is some confusion here. Caesar says (iii. 93) that at the beginning of the battle (not after the repulse of his cavalry) Pompey ordered his soldiers not to move from their places but to await the attack and not allow their line to be broken, thinking that the space between the two armies was so great that Caesar’s men if they charged across it would come up blown. This, he continues, seems to me to have been an error on Pompey’s part, because there is a certain ardor and eagerness of spirit inborn in mankind, which is excited in the heat of battle, and which commanders ought to encourage, not repress.
9. Caesar says that the Pompeians fled to their fortified camp, and that, although it was now midday and the heat was excessive, he exhorted his soldiers to make use of their good fortune and storm the enemy’s entrenchments, and that they obeyed cheerfully. After a short engagement here the Pompeians again fled and took refuge in the high mountains adjacent. (iii. 95.)
10. There is a striking similarity here both in language and narrative, between Appian and Plutarch. The former says:
Πομπήϊος ἀπῄει βάδην ἐς τὸ στρατόπεδον καὶ παρελθὼν ἐς τὴν σκηνὴν ἐκαθέζετο ἄναυδος.
The latter ( Life of Pompey, 72) says:
ἀπῄει βάδην εἰς τὸν χάρακα . . . εἰς τὴν σκηνὴν παρελθὼν ἄφθογγος καθῆστο.
Here is fresh confirmation of the belief that both Appian and Plutarch drew from a Greek, not from a Latin, source, for if they had translated from Latin it is most improbable that they would have used the same Greek words, in the same, or very nearly the same, order. Moreover, both of them make reference here to the Iliad xi. 543, where Ajax Telamon is smitten with panic by Zeus in the midst of battle. Plutarch quotes the passage itself.
11. Plutarch’s account of Pompey’s flight is in nearly the same words, viz: He sat in silence until some of those who were pursuing the fugitives rushed in with them, when he uttered the single sentence: What! in our very camp? He spoke not another word, but put on clothing suited to his present fortune and stole away. ( Life of Pompey, 72.) Caesar says: When our men forced their way into his intrenchment Pompey threw off his general’s uniform, mounted a horse, went out by the rear gate of his camp and urged his horse with all speed to Larissa. Nor did he stop there, but with the same speed, having collected a few of his scattered soldiers, still travelling by night, with a company of thirty horsemen, he pushed on to the sea where he embarked on a supply ship, etc. (iii. 96.)
12. Caesar puts his own loss at thirty centurions and 200 private soldiers, and Pompey’s at 15,000 killed and 24,000 prisoners. We must infer that Appian was not acquainted with Caesar’s Commentaries, for if he had been he would most probably have quoted him here instead of referring in a loose way to exaggerating writers.
13. The affair of Crastinus is mentioned by Caesar, by Florus, and by Plutarch in his life of Pompey and again in his life of Caesar. The reference here made to Asinius Pollio has led to much discussion in the learned world, touching the sources from which Appian and Plutarch drew. The words used by Crastinus are almost identical in the three passages (one of Appian and two of Plutarch), and this leads Wynne, Hulleman, and Hermann Peter to believe that both authors borrowed from Pollio’s history. Vollgraff on the other hand contends that as Pollio wrote in Latin it would have been little less than miraculous if both of them had used the same Greek words in translating it. He considers it remarkable also that the only reference made to Pollio’s writings by either of them should have been here, and that both of them mentioned incidentally the fact that Pollio himself took part in the engagement. All of these coincidences may be explained if we suppose that both Plutarch and Appian took the facts from a common Greek source; that is, from some author who took them from Pollio. (See Vollgraff’s Greek Writers of Roman History, Leyden, 1880.)