Notes on the current edition
Civil Wars
1.
This agrees with the account given by Caesar himself of what took place in his camp after his defeat at Dyrrachium. He made a speech to his soldiers in which he dwelt on the great success they had achieved prior to the last battle, and said that if all their efforts had not been equally successful they must repair the defects of Fortune with greater industry.
But whether their own panic, he continued,
or some mistake, or Fortune itself had snatched from them a victory already gained and assured, the utmost effort should be made so that the disaster incurred might be repaired by their bravery. If this were done the loss they had suffered would redound to their advantage, as had been the case at Gergovia (in Gaul), and those who had been timid in fighting before would now go into battle fearlessly. (iii. 73.)
2.
This could not have been a small town if it furnished the amount of food and wine which the text implies. Caesar speaks of it as
oppido pleno atque opulento.
3.
This incident contains a whole volume of the horrors of war to non-combatants in the ancient world. Here was a prosperous town of Thessaly blotted out of existence in a few hours’ time. Caesar says that the Thessalians at first espoused his cause but that they turned against him when they heard of his defeat at Dyrrachium. Naturally so. As they had no interest in the quarrel they were bound to be on the stronger side if they knew which it was. Their principal citizens guessed wrong, their town was destroyed, and they committed suicide in consequence. This was only one case among thousands.
4.
Both Plutarch and Caesar give entertaining accounts of what took place in Pompey’s camp after Caesar’s retreat.
They cried out, says the former,
that Caesar had fled. Some wanted to pursue him, others to cross over to Italy. Others despatched their friends and servants to Rome to hire houses in advance near the forum, as though they were about to run for office. (
Life of Pompey, 66.) Caesar’s narrative says:
They contended with each other openly about rewards and priesthoods and disposed of the consulship for years to come. Some demanded the houses and goods of men in Caesar’s camp, and there was a great controversy over the question whether Lucius Hirrus, who had been sent by Pompey on a mission to the Parthians, should have the right to stand for the next praetorship while absent. . . . Domitius, Scipio, and Lentulus Spinther had daily disputes over the succession to Caesar’s priesthood and descended to the vilest language, Lentulus claiming it on the score of age, Domitius boasting of his influence in the city and his dignity, while Scipio trusted to his relationship with Pompey. Acutius Rufus even accused Afranius, in Pompey’s presence, of betrayal of his army, which he said had been done in Spain. (iii. 82-83.)
5.
Literally,
to lead the enemy around from hunger to hunger,
ἐς λιμὸν ἐκ λιμοῦ. Mendelssohn prefers to read
ἐς λοιμὸν ἐκ λιμοῦ,
from famine to plague, and he refers to Plutarch (
Life of Cœsar, 40), who says that it was reported in Pompey’s camp that a pestilence had broken out in Caesar’s army in consequence of their unaccustomed diet. There is no authority for this change nor does it improve the text in any way. As Caesar was living off the country he would be obliged to move frequently
from hunger to hunger.
6.
Plutarch says that this nickname was bestowed upon Pompey by Domitius Ahenobarbus, the same who was sent to supersede Caesar in Gaul and who fell into the latter’s hands at Corfinium, and was dismissed with contempt. He was an intense aristocrat, enormously rich, and he hated Caesar with fury. He was killed in the pursuit after Pharsalus. During the exchange of pleasantries at Pompey’s head — quarters
Afranius, who had been accused of betraying his army in Spain, when he saw Pompey trying to avoid a battle said he wondered why his accusers did not move forward and fight this huckster of provinces. Favonius, who had suggested before they left Italy that Pompey should stamp armies out of the ground, now said:
Gentlemen, we shall not partake of the figs at Tusculum this year. (
Life of Pompey, 67.)
7.
The text, or at all events the punctuation, is here doubtful. I have followed that of Schweighäuser but his Latin version does not accord with it: Tandem a proposito se moveri passus, deo jam exitium ejus properante, concessit illorum voluntati. Quemadmodum et alias per totum illud bellum contra naturam suam, tardus fuerat et veluti torpidus, sic nunc, etc.,
i.e.:
Finally allowing himself to be moved from his purpose he yielded to their wish, a god now hurrying him to his doom. As in other matters he had been, contrary to his nature, sluggish and as it were stupefied through this whole war, so now, etc.
8.
These prodigies, with some slight variations, are related by Plutarch, by Lucan, and by Florus.
Never, says Florus,
were there more manifest signs of impending ruin.
9.
One of the grossly exaggerating writers is Florus, who says:
Never did fortune behold so large a force of the Roman people or so much of their dignity collected in one place. More than 300,000 men were assembled on one side and the other, in addition to the auxiliaries of kings and nations.
10.
The Thesmophorae (law-bringers) were Ceres and Proserpine. They were worshipped together as the goddesses of tillage and civilized life. The Thesmophoria was an annual religious festival at Athens.
11.
Schweighäuser says that the meaning of this passage is not quite clear to him. Combes-Dounous renders it intelligibly:
They came to take part in this war merely to have the glory of fighting in a contest where the empire of the Roman people was at stake.