Notes on the current edition
Library
1.
With this account of the parentage of Eumolpus, compare
Paus. 1.38.2
;
Scholiast on Eur. Ph. 854
;
Hyginus, Fab. 157
.
Isoc. 4.68
agrees with Apollodorus in describing Eumolpus as a son of Poseidon, but does not name his mother. On the other hand the
Parian Chronicle (
Marmor Parium 27ff.
) represents Eumolpus as a son of Musaeus, and says that he founded the mysteries of
Eleusis. Apollodorus does not expressly attribute the institution of the mysteries to Eumolpus, but perhaps he implies it. Compare
Apollod. 2.5.12
. It seems to have been a common tradition that the mysteries of
Eleusis were founded by the Thracian Eumolpus. See
Plut. De exilio 17
;
Lucian, Demonax 34
;
Photius, Lexicon, s.v.
Εὐμολπίδαι
. But some people held that the Eumolpus who founded the mysteries was a different person from the Thracian Eumolpus; his mother, according to them, was Deiope, daughter of Triptolemus. Some of the ancients supposed that there were as many as three different legendary personages of the name of Eumolpus, and that the one who instituted the Eleusinian mysteries was descended in the fifth generation from the first Eumolpus. See
Scholiast on Sophocles, Oedipus Colon. 1053
;
Photius, Lexicon, s.v.
Εὐμολπίδαι
. The story which Apollodorus here tells of the casting of Eumolpus into the sea, his rescue by Poseidon, and his upbringing in
Ethiopia, appears not to be noticed by any other ancient writer.
2.
As to the war between the Athenians and the Eleusinians, see
Paus. 1.5.2
;
Paus. 1.27.4
;
Paus. 1.31.3
;
Paus. 1.36.4
;
Paus. 1.38.3
;
Paus. 2.14.2
;
Paus. 7.1.5
;
Paus. 9.9.1
;
Alcidamas, Od. 23, p. 182, ed. Blass
;
Scholiast on Eur. Ph. 854
;
Aristides, Or. xiii. vol. i. pp. 190ff., ed. Dindorf
. Pausanias differs from Apollodorus and our other authorities in saying that in the battle it was not Eumolpus, but his son Ismarus or, as Pausanias calls him, Immaradus who fell by the hand of Erechtheus (
Paus. 1.5.2
,
Paus. 1.27.4
). According to Pausanias (
Paus. 1.38.3
), Erechtheus was himself slain in the battle, but Eumolpus survived it and was allowed to remain in
Eleusis (
Paus. 2.14.2
). Further, Pausanias relates that in the war with
Eleusis the Athenians offered the supreme command of their forces to the exiled Ion, and that he accepted it (
Paus. 1.31.3
;
Paus. 2.14.2
;
Paus. 7.1.5
); and with this account
Strab. 8.7.1
substantially agrees. The war waged by Eumolpus on
Athens is mentioned by
Plat. Menex. 239b
;
Isoc. 4.68
,
Isoc. 12.193
;
Dem. 60.8
; and
Plut. Parallela 31
. According to Isocrates, Eumolpus claimed the kingdom of
Athens against Erechtheus on the ground that his father Poseidon had gained possession of the country before Athena.
3.
Compare
Lyc. 1.98ff.
;
Plut. Parallela 20
;
Suidas, s.v.
παρθένοι
;
Apostolius, Cent. xiv.7
;
Aristides, Or. xiii. vol. i. p. 191, ed. Dindorf
;
Cicero, Pro Sestio xxi.48
;
Cicero, Tusculan. Disput. i.48.116
;
Cicero, De natura deorum iii.19.50
;
Cicero, De finibus v.22.62
;
Hyginus, Fab. 46
. According to Suidas and Apostolius, out of the six daughters of Erechtheus only the two eldest, Protogonia and Pandora, offered themselves for the sacrifice. According to
Eur. Ion 277-280
, the youngest of the sisters, Creusa, was spared because she was an infant in arms. Aristides speaks of the sacrifice of one daughter only. Cicero says (
Cicero, De natura deorum iii.19.50
) that on account of this sacrifice Erechtheus and his daughters were reckoned among the gods at
Athens. “Sober,” that is, wineless, sacrifices were offered after their death to the daughters of Erechtheus. See
Scholiast on Soph. OC 100
. The heroic sacrifice of the maidens was celebrated by Euripides in his tragedy
Erechtheus, from which a long passage is quoted by
Lyc. 1.100
. See
TGF (Nauck 2nd ed.), pp. 464ff.