Apollodorus Library 3.15

ed. Sir James George Frazer

View: By Section

Library. Apollodorus. ed. Sir James George Frazer. Cambridge, MA. 1921.

Sponsored by Perseus Project, Tufts University.

Funding provided by The Annenberg CPB/Project.

Current edition Perseus

Library (English) (Apollodorus. The Library, Vol 1-2. Frazer, James George, Sir, translator. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann Ltd. 1921.)

Editions (1)
Βιβλιοθήκη Perseus (Apollodorus. The Library, Vol 1-2. Frazer, James George, Sir, editor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann Ltd. 1921.) — 3.15 focus

Notes on the current edition

Library

1. Erechtheus is recognized as the son of Pandion by the Parian Chronicle ( Marmor Parium 28ff. ), Eusebius, Chronic. vol. i. p. 186, ed. A. Schoene , Hyginus, Fab. 48 and Ov. Met. 6.675ff. According to Ov. Met. 6.675ff. Erechtheus had four sons and four daughters.
2. Compare Harpocration, s.v. Βούτης , who tells us that the families of the Butads and Eteobutads traced their origin to this Butes. There was an altar dedicated to him as to a hero in the Erechtheum on the acropolis of Athens ( Paus. 1.26.5 ). Compare J. Toepffer, Attische Genealogie (Berlin, 1889), pp. 113ff. Erechtheus was identified with Poseidon at Athens ( Hesychius, s.v. Ἐρεχθεύς ). The Athenians sacrificed to Erechtheus Poseidon ( Athenagoras, Supplicatio pro Christianis 1 ). His priesthood was called the priesthood of Poseidon Erechtheus ( Pseudo-Plutarch, x. Orat. Vit. Lycurgus 30, p. 1027, ed. Dubner ; Corpus Inscriptionum Atticarum iii.805 ; Dittenberger, Sylloge Inscriptionum Graecorum(3) 790 ). An inscription found at the Erechtheum contains a dedication to Poseidon Erechtheus ( Corpus Inscriptionum Atticarum 387, vol. i ). Hence we may conclude with great probability that Heyne is right in restoring Ἐρεχθέως for Ἐριχθονίου in the present passage of Apollodorus. See the Critical Note.
3. Orithyia is said to have been carried off by Boreas from the banks of the Ilissus, where she was dancing or gathering flowers with her playmates. An altar to Boreas marked the spot. See below, Apollod. 3.15.2 ; Plat. Phaedrus 229b-c ; Paus. 1.19.5 ; Ap. Rhod., Argon. i.212ff. , with the Scholiast on Ap. Rhod., Argon. i.212 , from whom we learn that the story was told by the poet Simonides and the early historian Pherecydes. Compare Ov. Met. 6.683ff. According to another account, Orithyia was seen and loved by Boreas as she was carrying a basket in a procession, which was winding up the slope of the acropolis to offer sacrifice to Athena Polias, the Guardian of the City; the impetuous lover whirled her away with him, invisible to the crowd and to the guards that surrounded the royal maidens. See Scholiast on Hom. Od. xiv.533 , who refers to Aculiaus as his authority. A different tradition as to the parentage of Orithyia appears to be implied by a vase-painting, which represents Boreas carrying off Orithyia in the presence of Cecrops, Erechtheus, Aglaurus, Herse, and Pandrosus, all of whom are identified by inscriptions ( Corpus Inscriptionum Graecarum, vol. iv. p. 146, No. 7716 ). The painting is interpreted most naturally by the supposition that in the artist's opinion Aglaurus, Herse, and Pandrosus, the three daughters of Cecrops (see above, Apollod. 3.14.2 ), were the sisters of Orithyia, and therefore that her father was Cecrops, and not Erechtheus, as Apollodorus, following the ordinary Greek tradition ( Hdt. 7.189 ), assumes in the present passage. This inference is confirmed by an express statement of the Scholiast on Ap. Rhod., Argon. i.212 that Cecrops was the father of Orithyia. As to the vase-painting in question, see F. G. Welcker, Antike Denkmäler, iii.144ff. ; Baumeister, Denkmäler des klassischen Altertums, i.351ff.
4. This is the third instance of marriage or betrothal with a niece, the daughter of a brother, which has met us in Apollodorus. See above, Apollod. 2.4.3 ; Apollod. 2.4.5 . So many references to such a marriage seem to indicate a former practice of marrying a niece, the daughter of a brother.
5. Compare Eur. Ion 57ff. ; Paus. 7.1.2 , where, however, Creusa is not named.
6. The tragic story of Cephalus and Procris was told with variations in detail by ancient writers. See Scholiast on Hom. Od. xi.321 ; Eustathius on Hom. Od. xi.321, p. 1688 ; Ant. Lib. 41 ; Tzetzes, Chiliades i.542ff. ; Hyginus, Fab. 189 ; Ov. Met. 7.670-862 ; Serv. Verg. A. 6.445 ; Scriptores rerum mythicarum Latini, ed. Bode, i. pp. 16ff., 147 (First Vatican Mythographer 44; Second Vatican Mythographer 216) . Of these writers, Tzetzes closely follows Apollodorus, whom he cites by name. They are the only two authors who mention the intrigue of Procris with Pteleus and the bribe of the golden crown. The story was told by Pherecydes, as we learn from the Scholiast on Hom. Od. xi.321 , who gives an abstract of the narrative. In it the test of his wife's chastity is made by Cephalus himself in disguise; nothing is said of the flight of the abashed Procris to Minos, and nothing of the love of Dawn (Aurora) for Cephalus, which in several of the versions figures conspicuously, since it is the jealous goddess who suggests to her human lover the idea of tempting his wife to her fall. The episode of Procris's flight to Minos is told with some differences of detail by Antoninus Liberalis. As to the dog which Procris received from Minos, see above, Apollod. 2.7.1 . The animal's name was Laelaps ( Ov. Met. 7.771 ; Hyginus, Fab. 189 ). According to Hyginus, Fab. 189 , both the dog and the dart which could never miss were bestowed on Procris by Artemis (Diana). Sophocles wrote a tragedy Procris, of which antiquity has bequeathed to us four words. See The Fragments of Sophocles, ed. A. C. Pearson, vol. ii. pp. 170ff. The accidental killing of Procris by her husband was a familiar, indeed trite, tale in Greece ( Paus. 10.29.6 ).
7. The danger which the women incurred, and the device by which Procris contrived to counteract it, are clearly explained by Ant. Lib. 41 . According to him, the animals which Minos discharged from his body were snakes, scorpions, and millipeds.
8. Compare Tzetzes, Chiliades i.552 . After the homicide of his wife, Cephalus is said to have dwelt as an exile in Thebes ( Paus. 1.37.6 ).
9. See above, Apollod. 1.9.21 ; Ap. Rhod., Argon. i.211ff., ii.273ff. ; Scholiast on Hom. Od. xiv.533 ; Scholiast on Soph. Ant. 981 ; Hyginus, Fab. 14, pp. 42ff., ed. Bunte ; Ov. Met. 6.711ff. ; Serv. Verg. A. 3.209 . According to Hyginus, their wings were attached to their feet, and their hair was sky-blue. Elsewhere ( Hyginus, Fab. 19 ) he describes them with wings on their heads as well as on their feet. Ovid says that they were twins, and that they did not develop wings until their beards began to grow; according to him, the pinions sprouted from their sides in the usual way.
10. This is the version adopted by Ap. Rhod., Argon. i.1298-1308 , who tells us that when Zetes and Calais were returning from the funeral games of Pelias, Herakles killed them in Tenos because they had persuaded the Argonauts to leave him behind in Mysia; over their grave he heaped a barrow, and on the barrow he set up two pillars, one of which shook at every breath of the North Wind, the father of the two dead men. The slaughter of Zetes and Calais by Herakles is mentioned by Hyginus, Fab. 14, p. 43, ed. Bunte .
11. See above, Apollod. 1.9.21 . The story of Phineus and his sons is related by the Scholiast on Sophocles (Antigone, 981) , referring to the present passage of Apollodorus as his authority. The tale was told by the ancients with many variations, some of which are noticed by the Scholiast on Sophocles (Antigone, 981) . According to Soph. Ant. 969ff. , it was not their father Phineus, but their cruel stepmother, who blinded the two young men, using her shuttle as a dagger. The names both of the stepmother and of her stepsons are variously given by our authorities. See further Diod. 4.43ff. ; Scholiast on Hom. Od. xii.69 (who refers to Asclepiades as his authority); Scholiast on Ap. Rhod., Argon. ii.178 ; Hyginus, Fab. 19 ; Serv. Verg. A. 3.209 ; Scholiast on Ovid, Ibis 265, 271 ; Scriptores rerum mythicarum Latini, ed. Bode, i. pp. 9, 124 (First Vatican Mythographer 27; Second Vatican Mythographer 124) . According to Phylarchus, Aesculapius restored the sight of the blinded youths for the sake of their mother Cleopatra, but was himself killed by Zeus with a thunderbolt for so doing. See Sextus Empiricus, Adversus mathematicos i.262, p. 658, ed. Bekker ; compare Scholiast on Pind. P. 3.54(96) ; Scholiast on Eur. Alc. 1 . Both Aeschylus and Sophocles composed tragedies entitled Phineus. See TGF (Nauck 2nd ed.), pp. 83, 284ff. ; The Fragments of Sophocles, ed. A. C. Pearson, vol. ii. pp. 311ff.
12. Here Apollodorus departs from the usual tradition, followed by himself elsewhere ( Apollod. 1.9.21 ), which affirmed that the Argonauts, instead of punishing Phineus, rendered him a great service by delivering him from the Harpies.
13. With this account of the parentage of Eumolpus, compare Paus. 1.38.2 ; Scholiast on Eur. Ph. 854 ; Hyginus, Fab. 157 . Isoc. 4.68 agrees with Apollodorus in describing Eumolpus as a son of Poseidon, but does not name his mother. On the other hand the Parian Chronicle ( Marmor Parium 27ff. ) represents Eumolpus as a son of Musaeus, and says that he founded the mysteries of Eleusis. Apollodorus does not expressly attribute the institution of the mysteries to Eumolpus, but perhaps he implies it. Compare Apollod. 2.5.12 . It seems to have been a common tradition that the mysteries of Eleusis were founded by the Thracian Eumolpus. See Plut. De exilio 17 ; Lucian, Demonax 34 ; Photius, Lexicon, s.v. Εὐμολπίδαι . But some people held that the Eumolpus who founded the mysteries was a different person from the Thracian Eumolpus; his mother, according to them, was Deiope, daughter of Triptolemus. Some of the ancients supposed that there were as many as three different legendary personages of the name of Eumolpus, and that the one who instituted the Eleusinian mysteries was descended in the fifth generation from the first Eumolpus. See Scholiast on Sophocles, Oedipus Colon. 1053 ; Photius, Lexicon, s.v. Εὐμολπίδαι . The story which Apollodorus here tells of the casting of Eumolpus into the sea, his rescue by Poseidon, and his upbringing in Ethiopia, appears not to be noticed by any other ancient writer.
14. As to the war between the Athenians and the Eleusinians, see Paus. 1.5.2 ; Paus. 1.27.4 ; Paus. 1.31.3 ; Paus. 1.36.4 ; Paus. 1.38.3 ; Paus. 2.14.2 ; Paus. 7.1.5 ; Paus. 9.9.1 ; Alcidamas, Od. 23, p. 182, ed. Blass ; Scholiast on Eur. Ph. 854 ; Aristides, Or. xiii. vol. i. pp. 190ff., ed. Dindorf . Pausanias differs from Apollodorus and our other authorities in saying that in the battle it was not Eumolpus, but his son Ismarus or, as Pausanias calls him, Immaradus who fell by the hand of Erechtheus ( Paus. 1.5.2 , Paus. 1.27.4 ). According to Pausanias ( Paus. 1.38.3 ), Erechtheus was himself slain in the battle, but Eumolpus survived it and was allowed to remain in Eleusis ( Paus. 2.14.2 ). Further, Pausanias relates that in the war with Eleusis the Athenians offered the supreme command of their forces to the exiled Ion, and that he accepted it ( Paus. 1.31.3 ; Paus. 2.14.2 ; Paus. 7.1.5 ); and with this account Strab. 8.7.1 substantially agrees. The war waged by Eumolpus on Athens is mentioned by Plat. Menex. 239b ; Isoc. 4.68 , Isoc. 12.193 ; Dem. 60.8 ; and Plut. Parallela 31 . According to Isocrates, Eumolpus claimed the kingdom of Athens against Erechtheus on the ground that his father Poseidon had gained possession of the country before Athena.
15. Compare Lyc. 1.98ff. ; Plut. Parallela 20 ; Suidas, s.v. παρθένοι ; Apostolius, Cent. xiv.7 ; Aristides, Or. xiii. vol. i. p. 191, ed. Dindorf ; Cicero, Pro Sestio xxi.48 ; Cicero, Tusculan. Disput. i.48.116 ; Cicero, De natura deorum iii.19.50 ; Cicero, De finibus v.22.62 ; Hyginus, Fab. 46 . According to Suidas and Apostolius, out of the six daughters of Erechtheus only the two eldest, Protogonia and Pandora, offered themselves for the sacrifice. According to Eur. Ion 277-280 , the youngest of the sisters, Creusa, was spared because she was an infant in arms. Aristides speaks of the sacrifice of one daughter only. Cicero says ( Cicero, De natura deorum iii.19.50 ) that on account of this sacrifice Erechtheus and his daughters were reckoned among the gods at Athens. “Sober,” that is, wineless, sacrifices were offered after their death to the daughters of Erechtheus. See Scholiast on Soph. OC 100 . The heroic sacrifice of the maidens was celebrated by Euripides in his tragedy Erechtheus, from which a long passage is quoted by Lyc. 1.100 . See TGF (Nauck 2nd ed.), pp. 464ff.
16. According to Hyginus, Fab. 46 , Zeus killed Erechtheus with a thunderbolt at the request of Poseidon, who was enraged at the Athenians for killing his son Eumolpus.
17. Compare Paus. 1.5.3 ; Paus. 7.1.2 .
18. Compare Paus. 1.5.3 , who tells us that the tomb of Pandion was in the land of Megara, on a bluff called the bluff of Diver-bird Athena.
19. Compare Paus. 1.39.4 ; Paus. 4.36.1 ; Paus. 6.22.5 , who variously names this Megarian king Pylas, Pylus, and Pylon.
20. Compare Tzetzes, Scholiast on Lycophron 494 , who may have copied Apollodorus. The sons of Pallas, the brother of Aegeus, alleged that Aegeus was not of the stock of the Erechtheids, since he was only an adopted son of Pandion. See Plut. Thes. 13 .
21. Compare Paus. 1.5.4 , Paus. 1.39.4 , according to whom Aegeus, as the eldest of the sons of Pandion, obtained the sovereignty of Attica, while his brother Nisus, relinquishing his claim to his elder brother, was invested with the kingdom of Megara. As to the fourfold partition of Attica among the sons of Pandion, about which the ancients were not agreed, see Strab. 9.1.6 ; Scholiast on Aristoph. Lys. 58, and on Wasps 1223 .
22. Compare Tzetzes, Scholiast on Lycophron 494 , who may have copied Apollodorus.
23. As to the oracle, the begetting of Theseus, and the tokens of his human paternity, see Plut. Thes. 3 and Plut. Thes. 6 ; Tzetzes, Scholiast on Lycophron 494 ; Hyginus, Fab. 37 . As to the tokens, compare Diod. 4.59.1, 6 ; Paus. 1.27.8 ; Paus. 2.32.7 . Theseus is said to have claimed to be a son of Poseidon, because the god had consorted with his mother; and in proof of his marine descent he dived into the sea and brought up a golden crown, the gift of Amphitrite, together with a golden ring which Minos had thrown into the sea in order to test his claim to be a son of the sea-god. See Bacch. 16(17).33ff. , ed. Jebb ; Paus. 1.17.3 ; Hyginus, Ast. ii.5 . The picturesque story was painted by Micon in the sanctuary of Theseus at Athens Paus. 1.17.3 , and is illustrated by some Greek vase-paintings. See Frazer, commentary on Pausanias; vol. ii. pp. 157ff.
24. This account of the murder of Androgeus is repeated almost verbally by the Scholiast on Plat. Minos 321a . Compare Diod. 4.60.4ff. ; Zenobius, Cent. iv.6 ; Scholiast on Hom. Il. xviii.590 . All these writers mention the distinction won by Androgeus in the athletic contests of the Panathenian festival as the ultimate ground of his undoing. Serv. Verg. A. 6.14 and Lactantius Placidus on Statius, Achill. 192 say that, as an eminent athlete who beat all competitors in the games, Androgeus was murdered at Athens by Athenian and Megarian conspirators. Paus. 1.27.10 mentions the killing of Androgeus by the Marathonian bull. According to Hyginus, Fab. 41 , Androgeus was killed in battle during the war which his father Minos waged with the Athenians.
25. Compare Paus. 1.39.5 , who calls Megareus a son of Poseidon, and says that Megara took its name from him.
26. With this story of the death of Nisus through the treachery of his daughter Scylla, compare Aesch. Lib. 612ff. ; Paus. 1.19.5 ; Paus. 2.34.7 ; Tzetzes, Scholiast on Lycophron 650 ; Scholiast on Eur. Hipp. 1200 ; Prop. iv.19(18) 21ff. ; [Virgil], Ciris, 378ff. ; Hyginus, Fab. 198 ; Ov. Met. 8.6ff. ; Serv. Verg. Ecl. 6.74 ; Lactantius Placidus on Statius, Theb. i.333, vii.261 ; Scriptores rerum mythicarum Latini, ed. Bode, i. pp. 2, 116 (First Vatican Mythographer 3; Second Vatican Mythographer 121) . A similar tale is told of Pterelaus and his daughter Comaetho. See above, Apollod. 2.4.5 ; Apollod. 2.4.7 .
27. Compare Diod. 17.15.2 ; Hyginus, Fab. 238 (who seems to mention only one daughter; but the passage is corrupt); Harpocration, s.v. Ὑακινθίδες , who says that the daughters of Hyacinth the Lacedaemonian were known as the Hyacinthides. The name of one of the daughters of Hyacinth is said to have been Lusia ( Stephanus Byzantius, s.v. Λουσία ). Some people, however, identified the Hyacinthides with the daughters of Erechtheus, who were similarly sacrificed for their country (above, Apollod. 3.15.4 ). See Dem. 60.27 ; Suidas, s.v. παρθένοι . According to Phanodemus in the fifth book of his Atthis (cited by Suidas, s.v. παρθένοι) , the daughters of Erechtheus were called Hyacinthides because they were sacrificed at the hill named Hyacinth. Similarly, as Heyne pointed out in his note on the present passage, the three daughters of Leos, namely, Praxithea, Theope, and Eubule, are said to have sacrificed themselves voluntarily, or to have been freely sacrificed by their father, for the safety of Athens in obedience to an oracle. A precinct called the Leocorium was dedicated to their worship at Athens. See Ael., Var. Hist. xii.28 ; Dem. 40.28 ; Paus. 1.5.2 , with Frazer's note ( vol. ii. p. 78 ); Apostolius, Cent. x.53 ; Aristides, Or. xiii. vol. i. pp. 191ff., ed. Dindorf ; Cicero, De natura deorum iii.19.50 . So, too, in Boeotia the two maiden daughters of Orion are said to have sacrificed themselves freely to deliver their country from a fatal pestilence or dearth, which according to an oracle of the Gortynian Apollo could be remedied only by the voluntary sacrifice of two virgins. See Ant. Lib. 25 ; Ov. Met. 13.685-699 . The frequency of such legends, among which the traditional sacrifice of Iphigenia at Aulis may be included, suggests that formerly the Greeks used actually to sacrifice maidens in great emergencies, such as plagues and prolonged droughts, when ordinary sacrifices had proved ineffectual.
28. Compare Diod. 4.61.1-4 ; Plut. Thes. 15 ; Paus. 1.27.10 ; Scholiast on Plat. Minos 321a ; Verg. A. 6.20ff. ; Serv. Verg. A. 6.14 ; Hyginus, Fab. 41 ; Lactantius Placidus on Statius, Achill. 192 .
29. As to the Minotaur and the Labyrinth, see above, Apollod. 3.1.4 .
30. Compare Tzetzes, Chiliades i.490 , and the Scholiast on Plat. Ion 121a , both of whom name the father and mother of Daedalus in agreement with Apollodorus. The father of Daedalus is called Eupalamus also by Suidas (s.v. Πέρδικος ἱερόν) , the Scholiast on Plato (Rep. 7. 529d) , Hyginus, Fab. 39, 244, and 274 , and Servius on Virgil, vi.14 . He is called Palamaon by Paus. 9.3.2 , and Metion, son of Eupalamus, son of Erechtheus, by Diod. 4.76.1 . Our oldest authority for the parentage of Daedalus is Pherecydes, who says that the father of Daedalus was Metion, son of Erechtheus, and that his mother was Iphinoe ( Scholiast on Soph. OC 472 ); and this tradition as to the father of Daedalus is supported by Plat. Ion 533a . According to Clidemus, cited by Plut. Thes. 19 , Daedalus was a cousin of Theseus, his mother being Merope, daughter of Erechtheus. On the whole, tradition is in harmony with the statement of Paus. 7.4.5 “that Daedalus came of the royal house of Athens, the Metionids.” Compare J. Toepffer, Attische Genealogie, pp. 165ff. Through the clouds of fable which gathered round his life and adventures we may dimly discern the figure of a vagabond artist as versatile as Leonardo da Vinci and as unscrupulous as Benvenuto Cellini.
31. As to Daedalus's murder of his nephew, his trial, and flight, compare Diod. 4.76.4-7 ; Paus. 1.21.4 ; Paus. 1.26.4 ; Paus. 7.4.5 ; Tzetzes, Chiliades i.490ff. ; Suidas and Photius, Lexicon, s.v. Πέρδικος ἱερόν ; Apostolius, Cent. xiv.17 ; Scholiast on Eur. Or. 1648 ; Ov. Met. 8.236-259 ; Hyginus, Fab. 39, 244 ; Serv. Verg. G. 1.143 and Serv. Verg. A. 6.14 ; Isidore, Orig. xix.19.9 . The name of the murdered nephew is commonly given as Talos, but according to Paus. 1.21.4 and Suidas and Photius, Lexicon, s.v. Πέρδικος ἱερόν; it was Calos. On the other hand Sophocles, in his lost play The Camicians (cited by Suidas and Photius,ll.cc. ) called him Perdix, that is, Partridge; and this name is accepted by Ovid, Hyginus, Servius, and Isidore. But according to a different tradition, here followed by Apollodorus, Perdix (“Partridge”) was the name, not of the murdered nephew, but of his mother, the sister of Daedalus, who hanged herself in grief at the death of her son; the Athenians worshipped her and dedicated a sanctuary to her beside the acropolis (so Apostolius, Suidas and Photius, ll.cc. ). The grave of Talos or Calos was shown near the theatre, at the foot of the acropolis, probably on the spot where he was supposed to have fallen from the battlements ( Paus. 1.21.4 ). The trial of Daedalus before the Areopagus is mentioned by Diodorus Siculus and the Scholiast on Euripides l.c..
32. He is said to have improved the discovery by inventing the iron saw in imitation of the teeth in a serpent's jawbone. See Diod. 4.76.5 ; Tzetzes, Chiliades i.494ff. Latin writers held that the invention was suggested to him by the backbone of a fish. See Ov. Met. 8.244ff. ; Hyginus, Fab. 274 ; Serv. Verg. A. 6.14 ; Isidore, Orig. xix.19.9 . According to these Latin writers, the ingenious artist invented the compass also. As to Talos or Perdix and his mechanical inventions, see A. B. Cook, Zeus, i.724ff.