Sextus Empiricus Pyrrhoniae Hypotyposes 2.7.79

[79] This is enough to say now, in our outline sketch, with reference to the criterion ‟According to which,” as it was said, objects are judged. But one should notice that we do not propose to assert that the criterion of truth is unreal ¹ (for that would be dogmatism); but since the Dogmatists appear to have established plausibly that there really is a criterion of truth, we have set up counter-arguments which appear to be plausible; and though we do not positively affirm either that they are true or that they are more plausible than their opposites, yet because of the apparently equal plausibility of these arguments and of those propounded by the Dogmatists we deduce suspension of judgement.