Sextus Empiricus, Pyrrhoniae Hypotyposes, ed. Hermann Mutschmann, 2.14.193

Search the Perseus Catalog for:

View: By Chapter

← Previous Next →

[193] Διὸ καὶ περὶ τῶν θρυλουμένων συλλογισμῶν ἴσως περιττόν ἐστιν διεξιέναι, τοῦτο μὲν συμπεριτρεπομένων
αὐτῶν τῇ ὑπάρξει τῆς ἀποδείξεως (δῆλον γὰρ ὅτι ἐκείνης μὴ οὔσης οὐδὲ ἀποδεικτικὸς λόγος χώραν ἔχει), τοῦτο δὲ καὶ δυνά- μει διὰ τῶν ἔμπροσθεν ἡμῖν λελεγμένων ἀντειρηκότων ἡμῶν (146 sqq.) πρὸς αὐτούς, ὅτε περὶ τῆς παρολκῆς
διαλεγόμενοι μέθοδόν τινα ἐλέγομεν δι’ ἧς ἐνδέχεται δεικνύναι, ὅτι πάντες οἱ ἀποδεικτικοὶ λόγοι τῶν τε Στωικῶν καὶ τῶν Περιπατητικῶν ἀσύνακτοι τυγχάνουσιν ὄντες.

Pyrrhoniae Hypotyposes. Sextus Empiricus. ed. Hermann Mutschmann. Germany. 2014.

Current edition First1KGreek

Pyrrhoniae Hypotyposes (Greek) (Sextus Empiricus. Sexti Empiricii Opera, Volume 1. Mutschmann, Hermann, editor. Leipzig: Teubner, 1912.)

Translations (1)

Outlines of Pyrrhonism First1KGreek (Sextus Empiricus, Vol. 1. Bury, Robert Gregg, translator. London: William Heinemann Ltd.; New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1933.) — 2.14.193 focus

[193] So then it is also superfluous, perhaps, to discuss in detail the much vaunted ‟syllogisms,” since, for one thing, they are included in the refutation of the existence of ‟proof” (for it is plain that if this is non-existent there is no place either for probative argument), and for another, we have implicitly contradicted them in our previous statements, when in discussing redundancy¹ we mentioned a certain method by which it is possible to show that all the probative arguments of the Stoics and the Peripatetics are really inconclusive.

Sextus Empiricus Pyrrhoniae Hypotyposes 2.14.193

ed. Hermann Mutschmann

Search the Perseus Catalog for:

Current edition First1KGreek

Stable identifiers