Aristotle Poetics 10.4

ed. Henry James Pye

View: By Chapter
These should arise out of the fable itself and appear the necessary or probable consequence of what has happened before: for there is a wide difference between one event happening in consequence of another or only following it. 1 2

Poetics. Aristotle. ed. Henry James Pye. London. 1792.

Current edition Experimental

The Poetic of Aristotle (Henry James Pye, revised 1792) (OCR draft) (English) (Henry James Pye's revised 1792 English translation, corrected against the 1788 first edition, aligned to the Kassel reference edition, and supplied with a selective apparatus of substantive 1788 readings.)

Provisional text from uncorrected OCR; expect errors.

Editions (4)
Περὶ ποιητικῆς (OCR draft) (Aristotle, Poetics. Immanuel Bekker, editor, Aristotelis Opera, volume 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1837.) — 10 focus
Περὶ ποιητικῆς (OCR draft) Perseus (Aristotle, De arte poetica liber. Rudolf Kassel, editor. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965. Reference edition for passage alignment.) — 10 focus
Poetics, Greek text (Ingram Bywater, 1909) (OCR draft) Experimental (Ingram Bywater's Greek text of Aristotle's Poetics, published in 1909.) — 10 focus
Poetics, Greek text (Franz Ritter, 1839) (OCR draft) Experimental (Franz Ritter's 1839 Greek edition, corrected against OCR of the represented copy and aligned to the conventional Perseus chapter-and-subchapter sequence.) — 10 focus
Translations (13)
Poetics (W. H. Fyfe) (OCR draft) Perseus (William Hamilton Fyfe's English translation of Aristotle's Poetics, Loeb Classical Library, 1939 printing.) — 10 focus
Arabic Poetics (Badawī edition, 1953) (OCR draft) (The ancient Arabic translation of Aristotle's Poetics in ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Badawī's 1953 edition.) — 10 focus
Poetics (S. H. Butcher, 1911) (OCR draft) Experimental (S. H. Butcher's English translation from Aristotle's Theory of Poetry and Fine Art, fourth edition, 1911.) — 10 focus
Aristotle on the Art of Poetry (Ingram Bywater, 1909) (OCR draft) Experimental (Ingram Bywater's English translation of Aristotle's Poetics, published in 1909.) — 10 focus
Poetics (Thomas Twining, 1789) (OCR draft) Experimental (Thomas Twining's English translation of Aristotle's Poetics, published in 1789 and aligned to the Kassel reference passage sequence.) — 10.4 focus
And these should arise from the structure of the fable itself, so as to be the natural consequences, necessary or probable, of what has preceded in the action. For there is a wide difference between incidents that follow from, and incidents that follow only after, each other.
The Poetic of Aristotle (Theodore Alois Buckley) (OCR draft) Experimental (Theodore Alois Buckley's English translation, first published in 1850 and represented from the Henry G. Bohn 1857 printing; corrected against a second OCR and aligned to the Kassel reference passage sequence.) — 10.4 focus
For it makes a great difference whether these things are effected on account of these, or after these.
Poetica Latine conversa (Franciscus Ritter, 1839) (OCR draft) Experimental (Franz Ritter's Latin translation, corrected against OCR of the represented copy and aligned to the conventional Perseus chapter-and-subchapter sequence.) — 10 focus
La poëtique d'Aristote (André Dacier, 1692) (OCR draft) Experimental (André Dacier's French translation of Aristotle's Poetics, published in 1692.) — 10.4 focus
Or l'une & l'autre doivent naître de la conſtitution même du ſujet, de telle maniere, que ce qui précede les produiſe, ou neceſſairement ou vray-ſemblablement, car il y a une tres grande difference entre des incidens qui naiſſent les uns des autres, & des incidens qui viennent ſimplement les uns aprés les autres.
Poetica d'Aristotile (Bernardo Segni, 1549) (OCR draft) Experimental (Bernardo Segni's 1549 Florentine Italian translation, aligned to the Kassel reference passage sequence.) — 10 focus
De poetica (Antonio Riccobono, 1587) (OCR draft) Experimental (Antonio Riccobono's Latin translation, first published in 1587; text represented from Immanuel Bekker's 1831 edition.) — 10 focus
De arte poetica liber (William of Moerbeke, ca. 1277) (OCR draft) Experimental (William of Moerbeke's medieval Latin translation, represented by the 1953 Aristoteles Latinus edition.) — 10 focus
Arabic Poetics (Abū Bishr Mattā; Tkatsch edition) (OCR draft) Experimental (The Arabic translation attributed to Abū Bishr Mattā, edited by Jaroslaus Tkatsch in 1928 and aligned to the Kassel reference passage sequence.) — 10 focus
Arabic Poetics (Abū Bishr Mattā; Tkatsch edition, unaligned) (OCR draft) Experimental (Tkatsch's edition of the medieval Arabic translation in its original, unaligned segmentation.) — 10 focus

Notes on the current edition

Poetics

1. Συνεχής. Continuous. Having the events depending on each other. This part of the definition does not relate to the fimple fable only, but is equally applicable to the complicated.
2. Περιπέτεια. An unexpected revolution of fortune. I have retained the word in the tranflation, as it is naturalized in the language of dramatic criticifm.

Commentary

Commentary on the Poetics (Ingram Bywater, 1909) (OCR draft) (Ingram Bywater's English commentary on Aristotle's Poetics.) focus

1. mvp-aristotle-comment-381

1. mvp-aristotle-comment-382

1452a12 εἰσὶ δὲ τῶν μύθων κτέ. Chap. 10 is a sequel to 9. 1452 a 1-11 , and an application of its results. The real point is not in the formalistic distinction between the two kinds of μύθοι, with which it opens ( 12-18 ), but in the assertion that follows, viz. that even the complex story comes under the general canon of construction laid down in chap. 7 , and that the element of surprise (the ἀναγνώρισις and περιπέτεια) must be, like everything else in a play, part of the unity of the whole, the natural or necessary consequence of something before it ( ἐκ τῶν προγεγενημένων 19).

1. mvp-aristotle-comment-383

εὐθὺς: see on 5, 1449 a 36.
ὥσπερ ὥρισται
, i. e. in chaps. 7-8 .

2. mvp-aristotle-comment-384

περιπετείας ἢ ἀναγνωρισμοῦ: see on 6, 1450 a 34 . Both terms are explained in the next chapter.
1452a17
δὲ λέξις. The editors generally acquiesce in the corrected reading δὲ ἐξ ἧς, in lieu of which Vahlen has δέ ἐστιν ἐξ ἧς, and Susemihl δ᾽ ἐστὶν ἧς. I have suggested that Aristotle may possibly have written πεπλεγμένην δὲ λέγω ἧς, on the supposition that λέξις may be taken to represent λεγω ἧς.
ταῦτα, i. e. ἀναγνωρισμὸς and περιπέτεια.

4. mvp-aristotle-comment-385

ταῦτα. If any correction is wanted, αὐτά or τὰ μετ᾽ αὐτά is perhaps simpler than either τὰ ὕστερα ( Gomperz) or τἀναντία ( Bonitz) though this last has certainly the great advantage of supplying an easy explanation of the καθάπερ εἴρηται in 11, 1452 a 23 . The objection to ταῦτα is its supposed inelegance and superfluity. It is not more inelegant, however, than the γίγνεσθαι that immediately precedes it ( ταῦτα δὲ δεῖ γίνεσθαι ... ὥστε ... γίγνεσθαι ταῦτα); and its apparent superfluity is a common phenomenon with demonstratives in Greek ( v. Kühner, Gr. Gr. 2. 1 p. 660).

Remarques sur la poëtique d'Aristote (André Dacier, 1692) (OCR draft) (André Dacier's French commentary on Aristotle's Poetics.) focus

1. mvp-aristotle-comment-263

10.2 Appelle ſimples, les actions, , qui étant, comme on l'a déja dit, continues & unies finiſſent ſans reconnoiſſance & ſans péripetie.] 1

2. mvp-aristotle-comment-264

10.3 Et j'appelle implexes, celles qui ont, ou la péripetie, ou la reconnoiſſance, ou toutes les deux.] 2

3. mvp-aristotle-comment-265

10.4 Or l'une & l'autre doivent naitre de la conſtitution mème du ſujet, de telle manière, que ce qui précede les produiſe, ou neceſſairement ou vray-ſemblablement.] 3

4. mvp-aristotle-comment-266

10.4 Car il y a une tres grande difference entre des Incidens qui naiſſent les uns des autres, & des Incidens qui viennent ſimplement les uns aprés les autres.] 4

Commentary on the Poetics (Thomas Twining, 1789) (OCR draft) (Thomas Twining's notes on Aristotle's Poetics, aligned to the Kassel reference edition.) focus

81. mvp-aristotle-comment-81

NOTE 81. P. 84.

10.1 FABLES-SIMPLE, AND COMPLICATED.
It is high time to discard the technical jargon of implex fables, used by Addison, and others, after the French writers . 1 If any authority were requisite for speaking English, I have that of Mr. Harris, who renders Aristotle's
ἁπλοι
, and
πεπλεγμενοι
, by simple, and complicated. Phil. Inq. p. 146.

82. mvp-aristotle-comment-82

NOTE 82. P. 84.

10.2 WHEN ITS CATASTROPHE IS PRODUCED WITHOUT EITHER REVOLUTION OR DISCOVERY.
Ἀνευ περιπέτειας ἢ ἀναγνωρισμεως ἡ μεταβασις γινεται.
—
Μεταβασις
, is the change of fortune which constitutes the catastrophe of the piece. This, which is common to all Tragedy, must not be confounded with the
Περιπετεια
, which, however important, is not essential. Le Bossu, Dacier, and others, by not attending to this distinction, have introduced much confusion into one of the clearest parts of Aristotle's work. Thus, Dacier says—
"Il appelle fable simple, celle ou il n'y a ni changement d'etat, ni reconnoissance, et dont le denouement n'est qu'un simple passage de l'agitation et du trouble au repos et à la tranquillité."
He adopts the language of Le Bossu 2 . Undoubtedly, there are Tragedies without a sudden and unexpected reverse of fortune; but where is the Tragedy, antient or modern, in which there is no "changement d'etat?" This would be no other than a Tragedy without a catastrophe. Thus, these writers take
μεταβασις
to signify the mere passage, progress, or suite, of the piece 3 : whereas it clearly signifies a change; a transition from prosperous to adverse, or at least from adverse to more adverse, fortune, or the contrary; as Beni has well observed 4 . The sense of the word is clearly fixed by other passages; and in cap. xviii. he expressly makes the
μεταβασις
, such a change of fortune as is common to every Tragedy.
Ἔστι δε ΠΑΣΗΣ τραγῳδίας, το μεν, δεσις, το δε, λυσις.
λέγω δε δεσιν μεν εἶναι την ἀπ᾿ ἀρχης μεχρι τουτου του μερους ὃ ἔσχατον ἐστιν, ἐξ οὗ ΜΕΤΑΒΑΙΝΕΙ εις ευτυχίαν· λυσιν δε, την ἀπο της ἀρχης ΤΗΣ ΜΕΤΑΒΑΣΕΩΣ μέχρι τέλους.
Mr. Harris, in his Philol. Inquiries, p. 145, &c. seems to have deserted Aristotle for Le Bossu, who, with little reason, in my opinion, passed with him, as well as with Lord Shaftesbury, for "Aristotle's best interpreter 5 ." Throughout his chapter on this subject, above referred to, he appears to me to confound the
μεταβασις
, or change, which Aristotle makes essential to all Tragedy, with that particular kind of change which he denominates
περιπετεια
: for he uses, repeatedly, the word revolution, (his translation of
περιπετεια
,) to express what Aristotle means by
μετάβασις, μεταβαινειν, μεταβαλλειν
. He speaks of Othello, and Lear, as complicated fables, and having revolutions. And so, indeed, they have, if we take the word in Aristotle's sense of
μεταβασις
; I do not see that they have, in his sense of
περιπετεια
. In neither of those Tragedies can it, I think, be said, that the catastrophe is produced by a sudden change, to the reverse of what is expected, by the spectator, from the circumstances of the action. At least, with respect to Othello, this seems to admit of no dispute. [See the next NOTE.]
The Abbé Batteux gives, I think very properly, the Polieucte of Corneille, as an example of the simple fable.
"La fable simple, qui n' a ni revolution subite, ni reconnoissance; qui commence, continue, s'acheve, sans secousses, ni retours inattendus. Ainsi Polieucte reçoit le baptême, son zele lui fait renverser les autels des payens, il est arrêté, jugé, mis à mort: c'est une fable simple."
Principes de la Lit. tome iii. p. 84.
Victorius, Beni, Piccolomini, and Goulston, agree with me in my idea of this passage, where the words,
συνεχης και μιας
, are not put to characterize the simple fable, as Victorius well observes, but refer merely to that unity and continuity of action, which had been established as necessary to Tragedy in general.

Commentary on the Poetics (Henry James Pye, 1792) (OCR draft) (Henry James Pye's 1792 English commentary, aligned to the Kassel reference edition.) focus

10.1. mvp-aristotle-comment-29 10.2

I CALL THAT A SIMPLE ACTION WHICH HAS THE TRANSITION OF FORTUNE, WITHOUT PERIPETIA OR DISCOVERY.

ARISTOTLE here plainly diftinguishes between the peripetía, (περιπέτεια), the fudden and unexpected revolution of fortune, which is peculiar to the complicated action, and the μετάβασις, or change from misery to happiness, or vice-versa, which is not only common to every species of tragedy, but to every affecting tale, whether dramatic or narrative, serious or comic. The first of these, the peripetía, as Mr. Twining justly observes, is not to be found in Othello; nor, I think, in Lear, as written by Shakespear, whose misfortunes go on in regular fucceffion from their first cause, his obstinacy and self-opinion. The change of fortune arifes from the alteration of the conduct of his daughters; but this cannot be called fudden or unexpected, since it is foreseen by all the perfons of the drama, except the old king. I believe modern dramas have oftener the fimple than the complicated action, as our tragic distresses arise more from manners and paffion, than incident. See Note III. CC 2 CHAP.

Commentarius in Aristotelis Poeticam (Franciscus Ritter, 1839) (OCR draft) (Ritter's Latin commentary, extracted from the 1839 volume, divided by Ritter's chapters and sections, and linked to the corresponding Perseus reference subsections.) focus

1. mvp-aristotle-comment-75

Ritter, cap. 10 § 1

Fabulae aut simplices sunt aut implexae. implexarum propria est aut agnitio aut rerum in contrarium conversio aut utrumque. ante quam pergit declarare fabulae sive argumenti naturam, interim quot et quales species eius reperiantur definit.

2. mvp-aristotle-comment-76

Ritter, cap. 10 § 2

ἧς γινομένης, ὥσπερ ὥρισται, συνεχοῦς καὶ μιᾶς: verba ὥσπερ ὥρισται referenda sunt ad ea quae capite 7 et 8 et 9. de fabulae natura explicata sunt. quae adduntur συνεχοῦς καὶ μιᾶς, haec lectorem breviter admonent eorum quae illis locis uberius disputata sunt, actio fit συνεχής, si eius partes ex causa quadam ac principio deinceps prodeunt; eadem μία fit, si ex partibus ipsius arte coniunctis totum ( ὅλον) quoddam efficitur. πεπλεγμένην δέ, ἐξ ἧς μετ': quamquam de scripturae vulgatae integritate dubitatio vix admitti potest, tamen operae pretium videtur insignem codicum discrepantiam recognoscere et intelligere, quemadmodum ea ex uno fonte nata sit.nimirum ἐξ ἧς cum litteris coniunctis εξης scriberetur et pro mediae aetatis consuetudine εξις pronuntiaretur, ex eo nomen λέξις fecerunt. iam consequens erat ut πεπλεγμένην in nominativum mutarent, cum vulgares isti correctores magis studeant structurae sustentandae quam sententiae rite conservandae. itaque AcBcNa offerunt πεπλεγμένη δὲ λέξις μετὰ, idemque in M 14 16 21 haud dubie inest, quamquam Winstanleius nonnisi λέξις pro ἐξ ἧς attulit. M XIV exhibet πε πλεγμένη δὲ πρᾶξις eique consentiunt GP. Aldus prope ad verum accedens dedit πεπλεγμένη δὲ ἐξ ἧς cet. ἄνευ περιπετείας ἢ ἀναγνωρισμοῦ: quid sit περιπέτεια et ἀναγνωρισμός sequente capite illustratur. forma ἀναγνωρισμὸς ab altera ἀναγνώρισις quae paulo post adhibetur ita differt, ut ἀναγνώρισις actum agnoscendi, ἀναγνωρισμὸς potius agnitionem a poeta propositam designet.

3. mvp-aristotle-comment-77

Ritter, cap. 10 § 3

ταῦτα δὲ δεῖ γίνεσθαι ἐξ αὐτῆς τῆς συστάσεως τοῦ μύθου: ut fabulae implicatae unitas et forma poetica conservetur, peripetia vel agnitio aut ambo ex fabulae compositione sponte prodire debent, et ita quidem prodire, ut tamquam effectus causae appareant. vides idem h. 1. postulari, quod paulo ante (c. 9, 10), si fabulis deesset, pro summo vitio poetae notabatur.