Aeschylus Prometheus Bound 877

Prometheus Bound. Aeschylus. . 2026.

Current edition Experimental

Provisional text from uncorrected OCR; expect errors.

Commentary

Critical apparatus to Prometheus Bound (OCR draft) (Latin and Greek critical apparatus to Gottfried Hermann's 1852 edition of Prometheus Bound.) focus

846. mvp-aeschylus-tlg0085-tlg003-hermann1852-appcrit-lat1-957

ἐς ταὐτὸν:
ἐς ταὐτὸ
ante correctionem Vit.

847. mvp-aeschylus-tlg0085-tlg003-hermann1852-appcrit-lat1-958

ἔστιν:
ἔστιν
Μ.
ἔστι
G. Vit. Lips. edd. ante Vict. Afferunt hunc versum scholiastes Ambrosianus ad Od. IV. 563. VI. 204. Eustathius p. 1386, 12. 1509, 35. 1559, 60. quorum locorum in postremo
ἔστι τις πόλις
, in ceteris
ἔστι πόλις
legitur.

848. mvp-aeschylus-tlg0085-tlg003-hermann1852-appcrit-lat1-959

NA: Hic versus in Colb. 1. post sequentem positus est. In Vit. totus ita legitur,
Νείλου πρὸς αὐτῷ χώματι
. Inter versus adnotatum
καὶ πρὸς ἀναχωματισμῷ, ἤγουν ταῖς ὄχθαις
, et deinde in fine versus
τῷ στόματι
. Lips.
πρὸς αὐτόματι καὶ προςχώματι
.

849. mvp-aeschylus-tlg0085-tlg003-hermann1852-appcrit-lat1-960

ἐνταῦθα:
ταῦτα
pro
ἐνταῦθα
, superscripto ad ultimam syllabam
ν
, Lips.

849. mvp-aeschylus-tlg0085-tlg003-hermann1852-appcrit-lat1-961

τίθησιν:
τίθεισιν
, superscripto a sec. manu
η
, Μ.

851. mvp-aeschylus-tlg0085-tlg003-hermann1852-appcrit-lat1-962

χειρὶ: Libri
χειρὶ
, nisi quod M. a sec. manu gravem accentum habet.

851. mvp-aeschylus-tlg0085-tlg003-hermann1852-appcrit-lat1-963

ἀταρβεῖ:
ἀταρβεῖ
scholia explicant
ἀφοβοποιῷ
, similiterque Blomfieldius nullum metum incutiente, placido, comparans Moschi versus II. 50.
ἐν δ᾽ ἦν Ζεὺς Κρονίδης, ἐπαφώμενος ἠρέμα χερσὶν πόρτιος Ἰναχίης, τὴν ἑπταπόρῳ παρὰ Νείλῳ ἐκ βοὺς εὐκεράοιο πάλιν μετάμειβε γυναῖκα
. Non credam isto significatu hoc vocabulum dictum esse, qui ne aptus quidem hic est, quum non sit quare metuendam sibi manum eius a quo amatur putet Io: sed est epitheton ornans, potentiam Iovis significandi caussa positum.

851. mvp-aeschylus-tlg0085-tlg003-hermann1852-appcrit-lat1-964

θιγὼν:
θιγὼν
M. Rob. Ceteri
θίγων
.

852. mvp-aeschylus-tlg0085-tlg003-hermann1852-appcrit-lat1-965

γεννημάτων: Omnes libri
γεννημάτων
, nisi quod M. a pr. manu et Lips.
γεννημάτων
. Miror Valckenario placuisse quod ad Phoen. 639. refert Scaligerum ex Peyraredi coniectura in libri sui margine adscripsisse,
θιγημάτων
. Nam quod affert ex Hesychio,
θιγημάτων, μιασμάτων
, id alio spectare apertum est, et ne scriptum quidem sic est apud Hesychium, sed, uti debebat,
θιγμάτων
. Tanta tamen fuit auctoritas Valckenarii, ut huic probatum verbum analogiae contrarium reciperent Brunckius et Schützius. Nihil prodesse puto tali coniecturae defendendae hoc scholion codicis Vit.
ἐνταῦθα ὁ Ζεὺς πάλιν ποιήσει ἄνθρωπον, ἀφόβῳ χειρὶ ἐφαψάμενός σου· τέξεις δὲ καὶ παῖδα Ἔπαφον ὀνομαζόμενον, ἐπώνυμον τῆς ἐπαφήσεως τῆς Διός
. Sensum enim eo scholio, non verba singula reddi alia scholia ostendunt. At, inquiunt Valckenarius et Brunckius, absurdum est
γεννημάτων
. Fateor ita videri posse, quum non praecedat quo referatur hoc vocabulum: quod recte se haberet, si
ἔγκυον
pro
ἔμφρονα
dixisset. At non multo minus absurdum esset, si ferri posset,
θιγημάτων
. Nam si sanam mentem contactu suo restituit virgini, quis inde colligat etiam gravidam eo contactu factam esse? Inde mihi olim nata est suspicio, in quam postea vidi etiam Elmsleium incidisse, deesse hic versum post
ἔμφρονα
, praesertim quum
μόνον
, si ad
τίθησιν ἔμφρονα
referatur, plane sit inutile, quia mentis compotem Iuppiter etiam nutu et sola voluntate sua reddere poterat. Nam alia minus probabilis est Elmsleii coniectura, haec verba,
ἐπαφῶν ἀταρβεῖ χειρὶ καὶ θιγὼν μόνον
, ex adnotatione in textum venisse: quae verba neque interpretem produnt, et ad intelligentiam rei sunt necessaria. Itaque omissi versus signa ante hunc versum posui. Recte enim iam omnia procedent, si tale quid scriptum fuisse statuamus,
παύσας τε μόχθων τῶνδε φιτύσει γόνον
. Vereor enim ne nimiae negligentiae reum faciat Aeschylum, qui quasi res nota fuerit omnibus omisisse eum credat mentionem graviditatis afferatque contraria ratione non dissimiles versus ex Supplicibus 298-300.
ΧΟ. καὶ Ζεύς γ᾽ ἐφάπτωρ χειρὶ φιτύει γόνον. ΒΑ. τίς οὖν ὁ Δῖος πόρτις εὔχεται βοός;
ΧΟ. Ἔπαφος, ἀληθῶς ῥυσίων ἐπώνυμος·
quod ut illic
ῥύσια
dicuntur, etsi nihil praecessit quo id vocabulum referatur, sic hic dictum sit
γεννημάτων
. At multo tamen facilius ex eo, quod potitus virgine Iuppiter tangendo ex ea prolem genuit, servatam esse, quam genuisse eum prolem ex eo, quod mentis compotem reddiderit, potest intelligi.

853. mvp-aeschylus-tlg0085-tlg003-hermann1852-appcrit-lat1-966

τέξεις κελαινὸν Ἔπαφον:
τέξει κελαινὸν Ἔπαφ'
Lips.

English commentary on Prometheus Bound (OCR draft) (N. Wecklein, translated by F. D. Allen. Ginn & Company, 1893; compared with the 1891 printing. Printed commentary pages 31–144. Provisional alignment and unresolved OCR are visibly flagged.) focus

561-886. mvp-aeschylus-tlg0085-tlg003-wecklein-allen1893-com-eng1-375

1
2
561-886. Third Episode. Io and Prometheus. The myth of Io is connected with that of Prometheus by the person of Heracles, the libera- tor of Prometheus, who is descended from paphus, the son of Zeus and Io (see on 774). The appearance of Io therefore prepares the way for the introduction of Heracles in the Προ- μηθεὺς λυόμενος. But the immediate significance of this scene consists in the present relation of Zeus and Io. Io appears as innocent and yet perse- cuted; her sufferings, superficially considered, put Zeus in the worst possible light. Accordingly the in- dignation of Prometheus rises more and more, till at last, carried away by passion, he vaunts his secret in such terms that the interposition of Zeus becomes inevitable. So the transition to the catastrophe is pre- pared. The geographical part of this episode, with its description of marvels, like the scene of Heracles in the Προμηθεὺς λυόμενος (see below, Frg. VII. and VIII.), doubtless had a peculiar charm for the Athenians of the period. On the origin of the myth of Io, see Introd. p. 9, footnote. Io appears as a horned maiden (588, 674; so indi- cated by her mask). In early Greek art, especially in vase-paintings, she has the figure of a cow outright. On the throne of the Amyclaean Apollo, a work of the sculptor Bathycles (about Ol. 60), Hera was represented as glaring at Io, 'who is already a cow' (Paus. iii. 18. 7). On an archaic black-figured vase of the Munich collection (No. 573; see Panofka, Argos Panoptes, plate 5), Argus is seen, seated on the ground, a fero- cious figure with long hair and beard, and a huge eye in his shaggy breast; he holds in his hand a long cord, attached to the horns of a cow. Near by stands Hermes, grasping the cord near the horns with his left hand, and about to draw his sword with his right. Argus's dog
stands at bay in front of his master. Through the influence of this trag- edy, Io came later to be depicted in art as a maiden with horns. So, for instance, on a red-figured vase of the Berlin Museum (Panofka, l.c., plate 3). The stinging gadfly' of the legend (cp. Suppl. 306 BΑ. τί οὖν ἔτευξεν ἄλλο δυσπότμῳ βοΐ; ΧΟ. βοη- λάτην μύωπα κινητήριον, Verg. Georg. iii. 147 cui nomen asilo Ro- manum est, oestrum Graii vertere vocantes), which is mentioned in Io's narrative, 675 be- low, had also to be omitted in the scenic representation. The difficulty was met by a figurative conception of οἶστρος; the maddening sting was interpreted as the reminiscence of the crafty eye of Argos (567). — On account of the unusual manner of Io's entrance and exit, the anapaests which commonly accompany the ar- rival and departure of a personage are here and at 877 given to the actor, not to the chorus. So above, at the entrance of the chorus (120 ff.).

845. mvp-aeschylus-tlg0085-tlg003-wecklein-allen1893-com-eng1-537

3
4
845. τῶν πάλαι λόγων: the refer- ence is to 815. πάλαι of the recent past, as Ag. 587 ἀνωλόλυξα μὲν πάλαι χαρᾶς ὕπο, ὅτ᾽ ἦλθ᾽ ὁ πρῶτος νύχιος ἄγγελος πυρός.

846. mvp-aeschylus-tlg0085-tlg003-wecklein-allen1893-com-eng1-538

5
6
846. ἔστιν πόλις Κάνωβος : the narrative begins, in epic fashion, with a description of the locality. Cp. Od. iii. 293 ἔστι δέ τις λισσὴ αἰπεῖά τε εἰς ἅλα πέτρη, Il. ii. 811 ἔστι δέ τις προπά- ροιθε πόλιος αἰπεῖα κολώνη (in Latin poets est locus), Soph. Trach. 237 ἀκτή τις ἔστ᾽ Εὐβοιίς, 752 ἀκτή τις ἀμφί- κλυστος ἔστιν, Ant. 966 παρὰ δὲ κυανέων σπιλάδων ἀκταὶ Βοσπόριαι ἰδ᾽ ὁ Θρῃκῶν Σαλμυδησσὸς ἵνα κτέ., Eur. Hipp. 1199 ἀκτή τις ἔστι τοὐπέκεινα τῆσδε γῆς, Iph. Τ. 262 ἦν τις διαρρὼξ κυμάτων πολλῷ σάλῳ κοιλωπὸς ἀγμός, 1450 χῶ- ρός τις ἔστιν ᾿Ατθίδος πρὸς ἐσχάτοις ὅροισι, also Aesch. Pers. 447. — χθονός: of its region. Cp. Suppl. 717 οἴακος ἰθυντῆρος ὑστάτου νεώς. For the story cp. Suppl. 311 καὶ μὴν Κάνωβον κἀπὶ Μέμφιν ἵκετο (sc. Ιώ).

847. mvp-aeschylus-tlg0085-tlg003-wecklein-allen1893-com-eng1-539

7
8
847. προσχώματι: τῷ ὑπὸ τοῦ πο- ταμοῦ ἐτησίῳ προσθήματι τοῦ χώματος, Schol. Cp. Solon Frg. 28 Νείλου ἐπὶ προχοῇσι Κανωβίδος ἐγγύθεν ἀκτῆς.

848. mvp-aeschylus-tlg0085-tlg003-wecklein-allen1893-com-eng1-540

9
10
848. τίθησιν : to Prometheus's pro- phetic vision the future is like the present. See on 109 and 211. - ἔμ- φρονα: Aeschylus has changed the story. The prevailing account (see on 561) was, according to the scholi- ast on Eur. Phoen. 678, ὁ Ζεὺς ἐπαφη- σάμενος· τῆς Ἰοῦς πάλιν εἰς γυναῖκα μετεμόρφωσε. Cp. Ovid Met. i. 738 vultus capit illa priores, fitque quod ante fuit.

849. mvp-aeschylus-tlg0085-tlg003-wecklein-allen1893-com-eng1-541

11
12
849. ἐπαφῶν: the word is chosen with reference to the name Ἔπαφος and its supposed etymology. Cp. Suppl. 46 ἐπωνυμίᾳ δ᾽ ἐπεκραίνετο μόρ- σιμος αἰὼν εὐλόγως, Ἔπαφόν τ᾽ ἐγέννα- σεν. The ease and painlessness of the transformation, expressed by ἐπα- φῶν ἀταρβεῖ χειρί, is further empha- sized by καὶ θιγὼν μόνον. Cp. Suppl. !
576 δίῳ δ᾽ ἀπημάντῳ σθένει καὶ θείαις ἐπιπνοίαις παύεται, 1065 Ἰὼ πημονᾶς ἐλύσατ᾽ εὖ χειρὶ παιωνίᾳ κατασχεθών, εὐμενεῖ βίᾳ κτίσας, 45 ἐξ ἐπιπνοίας Ζηνὸς ἔφαψιν.

850. mvp-aeschylus-tlg0085-tlg003-wecklein-allen1893-com-eng1-542

13
14
850. Prometheus, in saying τῶν Διὸς γεννημάτων instead of τῆς Διὸς ἐπαφῆς, hints at what is expressly stated Suppl. 312 καὶ Ζεύς γ᾽ ἐφάπτωρ χειρὶ φιτύει γόνον. Το this 834 above also alludes. - ἐπώνυμον τῶν Διὸς γεννημάτων: means "called after the manner of his begetting" (by ἐπαφή). Similarly Suppl. 314 "Επαφος ἀληθῶς ῥυσίων ἐπώνυμος, where ῥύσια = “ re- storation by ἐπαφή.”

851. mvp-aeschylus-tlg0085-tlg003-wecklein-allen1893-com-eng1-543

15
16
851. τέξεις: the same form 869, the middle form 768.

852. mvp-aeschylus-tlg0085-tlg003-wecklein-allen1893-com-eng1-544

17
18
852. πλατύρρους: cp. Frg. 304 ἔνθα Νεῖλος ἑπτάρους. The uncon- tracted -poos appears in Frg. 280 πλεκτάνην χειμάρροον. ...

853. mvp-aeschylus-tlg0085-tlg003-wecklein-allen1893-com-eng1-545

19
20
853. πέμπτη: see on 774.

854. mvp-aeschylus-tlg0085-tlg003-wecklein-allen1893-com-eng1-546

21
22
854. οὐχ ἑκοῦσα: explained by φεύγουσα ἀνεψιῶν below. – ἐλεύ- σεται: ἐλεύσομαι recurs Suppl. 522. Elsewhere the Attic poets use only εἶμι.