αὐτῶν τῶν δούλων
. “Quum ingenui desint, a quibus auxilium petat, nonnullis ex servorum ipsorum, quos timet, numero adulari cogitur” (Schneider). This explanation, which Vermehren also approves (
Pl. Stud. p. 114), exactly meets the case, and there is no reason either to change
αὐτῶν to
αὖ (with Stephanus) or to delete
τῶν δούλων (with Ast and Herwerden).
οὐδὲν δεόμενος
: ‘when he needn't.’ He is under no obligation to set them free: why then should he make them a present of their freedom? The innuendo is in Plato's neatest style. For the language cf. (with Schneider) Plut.
Tib. Gracch. 21. 2
δείσασα περὶ τοῦ ἀνδρὸς ἡ βουλὴ ψηφίζεται μηδὲν δεομένη πέμπειν αὐτὸν εἰς Ἀσίαν. The conjecture
οὐδὲν δεομένους (Groen v. Prinsterer
Prosop. Plat. p. 211, Ast, and Herwerden, who appeals in vain to Plut.
Cato Maior 12. 3, Dem. 11. 9, and Isocr.
Areop. 25) is, as Schneider shews, inept; for if the slaves do not need to be set free, because they are practically free already, “ne ero quidem opus est ut ad eos coercendos illam aliamve ineat rationem.”
ἄλλους ‐‐ γείτονας
. These freeborn neighbours in Plato's simile represent surrounding independent States, who detest tyranny, and help the tyrant's subjects. See Newman's
Politics of Aristotle II p. 315.
ὑπὸ πάντων πολεμίων
: ‘by none but enemies’: cf.
πᾶσιν ἀγρίοις in VI 496 D. The tyrant's splendid but awful isolation is admirably brought out by Plato: see also on VIII 567 B. In this respect Plato's similitude faithfully reflects the position of Dionysius I in Sicily and indeed, except for the support which Sparta lent him, in the whole Hellenic world. See Grote X p. 306 ff.
ἐν τοιούτῳ κτλ.
The picture which follows is no doubt also drawn from Dionysius I: see Grote X pp. 244, 328 notes
λίχνῳ
“is the same with regard to the eye, that liquorishness is to the taste” (Thomas Gray).
οὔτε ἀποδημῆσαι κτλ.
The parallel with Xen.
Hiero 1. 11 is singularly close. Plato speaks
con amore, thinking doubtless of his own sojournings in foreign lands. See Zeller^{4} II pp. 404—414. Neuman
de locis Aegypt. in oper. Plat. (1874) discovers many allusions to Plato's ‘Wanderjahre’ throughout his works.
ὅσων δὴ κτλ.
Such as the Olympian games etc.: cf. Xen. l.c.
τὰς κοινὰς πανηγύρεις ἔνθα τὰ ἀξιοθεατότατα δοκεῖ εἶναι ἀνθρώποις συναγείρεσθαι. Dionysius was represented at Olympia by deputy, as Hermann reminds us (
Gesch. u. System p. 116). Cf. Grote X p. 303. The phrase
τι ἀγαθὸν ὁρᾷ, with which the sentence concludes, has a curiously modern sound.
οὐκοῦν κτλ.
: ‘greater then, by evils such as these, is the profit which is reaped by the individual who’ etc. (“Um so grosse Übel reicher also ist der Mann” Schleiermacher).
τοῖς τοιούτοις κακοῖς is dative of amount of difference: cf. II 373 E
μείζονος—οὔτι σμικρῷ, ἀλλ’ ὅλῳ στρατοπέδῳ, VI 507 E
οὐ σμικρᾷ—ἰδέᾳ— τιμιωτέρῳ and
Laws 848 B (Schneider
Addit. p. 72). The passage has been strangely misunderstood, Stephanus suggesting variously <
ἐπὶ> or
<πρὸς> τοῖς τοιούτοις or
τῶν τοιούτων, and Ast
<ἐν> τοῖς τοιούτοις. Stallbaum comes nearer to the truth in his “per huius modi mala,” but the dative is exactly as in
τοσούτῳ πλείω. The view that the dative is merely one of ‘circumstance’—an alternative suggestion in J. and C.—cannot be upheld. See also on 578 C. The reference in
νῦν δή is to 578 B.
ὡς μὴ κτλ.
I have returned to the text of A,
Π, and nearly all the MSS.
Θ^{1} with Stobaeus (
Flor. 50. 50) has
μὴ ὡς, and so Stallbaum and Baiter read.
μὴ ὡς suits better with
ἀλλὰ ἀναγκασθῇ, but the irregularity is slight, and, as Schneider observes, the sentence opens as if it were meant to be positive and not negative, so that
ὡς μή is suited to what precedes. We may add that
ὡς μὴ ἰδιώτης καταβιῷ is a clearer echo of
μὴ ἰδιώτην βίον καταβιῷ 578 C, which Plato wishes to recall.
κἂν εἰ μή τῳ δοκεῖ κτλ.
Cf. V 473 A and (for
κἄν) III 408 B note The reading
δοκῇ (see cr. n.) is retained by Schneider, but
ε and
η are easily confused, and, even if we allow sporadic instances of
εἰ with the subjunctive in Attic, the analogy of V 473 A, as well as the sense, is in favour of
δοκεῖ. There need not be a specific allusion in
τῳ: for praises of tyranny and the tyrant's lot were common enough in Greece: cf. I 344 B, VIII 568 A notes The phrase
τῷ ὄντι invites us to understand
τύραννος and
δοῦλος in the fullest sense: cf. V 474 A note
δοῦλος κτλ.
I once too rashly placed
καὶ κόλαξ after
δοῦλος, in order to obtain a chiasmus, understanding
δουλείας τῶν πονηροτάτων like
δούλων δουλείαν in VIII 569 C. Two inferior MSS have
δουλείας καὶ θωπείας: but the inversion is not difficult, because the two notions are so closely allied: cf. (with Schneider)
Euthyd. 302 B
ἄπορόν τινα στροφὴν ἔφευγόν τε καὶ ἐστρεφόμην (where Schanz's brackets ‘nemini nocent’).
καὶ τὰς ἐπιθυμίας κτλ.
Xenophon's
Hiero is in effect a diluted commentary on this sentence: cf. also
Gorg. 524 E
ff., and especially Shakespeare's
Macbeth IV 3. 50—99, V 3. 22— 29.
σφαδᾳσμῶν
=‘convulsive movements’ is a rare word. The spelling
σφαδᾳσμός appears in no MS except A^{1}; but the iota is attested from other sources: see Stephanus-Hase
Thes. s. v. The verb
σφαδᾴζειν (
μετὰ σπασμοῦ πηδᾶν Hesych.) denotes any nervous, twitching, convulsive motion, outside one's own control, the result of excitement, fear, pain, disease etc. (Stephanus-Hase l.c.). For the sense of this passage cf. 577 E note