δἰ ὅλης ‐‐ διὰ πασῶν
. δἰ ὅλης sc.
τῆς πόλεως, not
λύρας, as J. and C. strangely suppose.
διὰ πασῶν sc.
τῶν χορδῶν should be taken with
ξυνᾴδοντας (so also Schneider).
ἡ διὰ πασῶν συμφωνία is the octave (Arist.
Probl. XIX 35. 920^{a} 27 ff.), the
καλλίστη συμφωνία, according to the Greeks (Arist. l.c.), readily sounding to the ear as absolute unison; hence the point of
ταὐτόν, which is an accusative depending directly on
ξυνᾴδοντας. See Arist. l.c. 14. 918^{b} 7 ff.
διὰ τί λανθάνει τὸ διὰ πασῶν καὶ δοκεῖ ὁμόφωνον εἶναι, οἷον ἐν τῷ φοινικίῳ καὶ ἐν τῷ ἀνθρώπῳ; The whole expression
διὰ πασῶν ξυνᾴδοντας ταὐτόν therefore means that the concord of the citizens on the matter in question is absolute and complete. Further than this I do not think the comparison is to be pressed. If we seek to find analogies between
ἀσθενεστάτους, ἰσχυροτάτους, μέσους and the
ὑπάτη, νήτη and
μέση of the scale, we are met by the difficulty that the
μέση cannot be said to produce the same (
ταὐτόν) note as the
ὑπάτη and
νήτη, and we are not at liberty to suppose that Plato is thinking of
ἡ δὶς διὰ πασῶν in the face of his own words, which refer only to a single octave (
διὰ πασῶν παρεχομ νη κτλ.). In talking of
σωφροσύνη Plato usually distinguishes only between two classes—rulers and ruled: 431 D, E and infra
χείρονός τε καὶ ἀμείνονος. See also on 443 D.
φρονήσει ‐‐ ἰσχύϊ ‐‐ πλήθει
define
ἀσθενεστάτους, ἰσχυροτάτους, μέσους. The equipoise and measured cadence of this stately sentence may well suggest a chorus of voices singing in unison. Cf. III 401 C. Cobet's excision of the second
βούλει is sadly out of tune.
ταύτην τὴν ὁμόνοιαν
prepares us for the definition about to follow. There are various
ὁμόνοιαι: this one is agreement
ὁπότερον δεῖ ἄρχειν etc.
χείρονος κτλ.
: ‘concord between the naturally better and the naturally worse, on the question which should rule, whether in a city or in an individual.’
ἐν ἑνὶ ἑκάστῳ anticipates 442 C f.; but is justified here by 431 A, B.
ὥς γε ‐‐ δόξαι
. This phrase is apparently quite unique in Plato: see Grünenwald cited on 430 E.
ὥσπερ κυνηγέτας
. The image is a favourite one with Plato: cf.
Laws 654 E,
Parm. 128 C
,
Lys. 218 C
. Other examples may be found in Stallbaum's note on this passage. The particular kind of hunting from which Plato takes his illustration is clearly described in Xen.
de Ven. 8. 4—8. A net was drawn round the bush where the hare was, and the hunters stood round, ready
μεταθεῖν κατὰ τὰ ἴχνη, ἐὰν ἐκκυλισθῇ ἐκ τῶν δικτύων.
φράσῃς
: ‘point out.’ There is no occasion to read (with Ast and
q)
καί μοι φράσεις.
μετρίῳ
. See cr. n.
μετρίως χρῆσθαι could only mean ‘to
treat fairly,’ but this is not to the point. The only relevant meaning is ‘you will find me very tolerable,’ and
μετρίῳ μοι χρήσει conveys this sense exactly. Cf.
ἑπομένῳ χρῇ—καὶ δυναμένῳ and
Xen.
Cyr. III 2. 4
ὀλίγοις τε καὶ ἀσθενέσι χρησαίμεθ’ ἂν πολεμίοις,
Symp. 2 9, 10. On the error see
Introd. § 5.
εὐξάμενος
: like a pious huntsman: cf. Xen.
de Ven. 6. 13
εὐξάμενον τῷ Ἀπόλλωνι καὶ τῇ Ἀρτέμιδι τῇ Ἀγροτέρᾳ μεταδοῦναι τῆς θήρας. Cf. also (with Stallbaum)
Phil. 25 B
εὔχου δὴ καὶ σκόπει and
Tim. 27 C
.
ἕπου οὖν (suggested by Richards) seems to me much less spirited and picturesque than
ἕπου; and the cacophony is also unpleasing. For the asyndeton cf. II 373 E note
ἔστι γοῦν ‐‐ δυσδιερεύνητος
has been objected to as adding little or nothing to
δύσβατος—ἐπίσκιος. But
δυσδιερεύνητος, ‘difficult to beat,’ said of beating or scouring the brake to rouse (
κινεῖν Xen.
de Ven. 8. 7) the game and drive it out into the net, could ill be spared; so apt a word is much too good for a copyist. Cf.
Menex. 240 B
, where
διερευνᾶσθαι is used of the famous ‘beating’ of Euboea by Datis' soldiers: and see also
Laws 698 D.
ἰοῦ, ἰοῦ
: ‘Joy! Joy!’
ἰού dolentis,
ἰοῦ gaudentis, according to the Scholiast on
Ar.
Peace 318
: cf. Suidas s.v. Ancient authorities differed on the point (see Blaydes' critical note l.c.), but modern scholars for the most part agree with Suidas.
ἐκφευξεῖσθαι ‐‐ εὖ ἀγγέλλεις
. The contracted form of the future of
φεύγω is established by the authority both of the Paris MS, and also of Aristophanes and Euripides, as Schanz has proved (Vol. XII p. xvi). Schanz may be right in supposing that it is borrowed “ex ore populi.” For
εὖ ἀγγέλλεις Phrynichus (S. V.
εὐαγγελίζομαί σε) apparently read
εὐαγγελεῖς, on which see Lobeck
Phryn. p. 632 and Cobet
N. L. p. 163.
εὐαγγελῶ does not seem to be used in Attic prose. In
Theaet. 144 B
εὖ ἀγγέλλεις is read by B,
εὖ ἀγγελεῖς by T.