διαφέρειν ἐκείνου
is rejected by Herwerden; but Schneider's explanation hits the mark: “
αὖ alterum hoc de discrimine insolentius dictum notat: prius fuerat quod domos
εὐνάς dixerat.”
κακουργεῖν
. See 407 B note The idiom is abundantly attested, both in Plato and in other Greek authors, although Madvig and Cobet have done their best to expel it from Plato's text here and wherever else it occurs.
μὴ τοιοῦτον ‐‐ ποιήσωσι
. For
τοιοῦτον cf. 388 D note Richter conjectured
μὴ τοιοῦτοι—ποιηθῶσι, “parum venuste,” as Hartman mercifully says.
ἀντὶ ξυμμάχων ‐‐ ἀφομοιωθῶσιν
. For the usual ampliative or explanatory asyndeton cf. 409 B. Aristotle objects that Plato's regulations would virtually divide his city into two hostile camps (
Pol. B 5. 1264^{a} 24), and Grote does not see “what reply the Platonic
Republic furnishes to this objection” (l.c. III p. 213). In reply to Aristotle, Plato might have pointed to his regulations about the interchange of classes (415 B ff.), which would have the effect of binding them together more securely. Moreover, where each individual has the work to do for which he is best qualified, one fruitful cause of discontent and sedition is removed. The wives and families of the lower class would also tend to keep them quiet. Nor does Aristotle's objection allow sufficient weight to the training by which Plato tries to protect his guardians from such ‘spiritual pride’ as would alienate their subjects.
καὶ ἐγὼ εἶπον
. See cr. n.
καὶ ἔγωγ’ εἶπον, though generally retained, is surely wrong: it could only mean ‘I too, said I.’ No editor cites any other instance of
ἔγωγε in this formula.
τοῦτο μὲν κτλ.
prepares us for the second scheme of education in Book VII: cf. 412 B, 414 A notes
ἥτις ‐‐ ἐπαροῖ
. αὐτούς is emphatic: “ipsos per se” (Schneider). The contrast is between the guardians in themselves, and in their dealings with the others. It is difficult to decide between
παύσει—ἐπαρεῖ (Bekker and others) and
παύσοι—ἐπαροῖ. The latter is
exquisitius, and better supported on the whole. For the confusion between
‐ῃ (subjunctive) and
‐οι (optative) in A see
Introd. § 5. Cobet calls for
τοῦ instead of
τούς before
φύλακας, but
φύλακας requires the article.
παύειν with the infinitive is rare, and means ‘prevent,’ not ‘make to cease’: cf. Hdt. V 67 (with Stein's note) and
Ar.
Ach. 634
, where Reiske's conjecture
πείσας should not be accepted.
πρῶτον μὲν κτλ.
A certain measure of communism in property seems to have existed among the Pythagoreans (RP.^{7} p. 43); but there is no reason to suppose that Plato is deliberately borrowing from them here: cf. Steinhart
Einleitung p. 179. The main object of Plato is of course to prevent the formation of private interests likely to compete with the claims of public duty. We remark that there has been no hint so far of common wives and children, although Blaschke (
der Zusammenhang d. Fam. u. Gütergemeinschaft d. pl. St. m. d. pol. u. phil. Syst. Platos p. 7) thinks he finds one in 415 A. Cf. 415 D note
ἂν μὴ πᾶσα ἀνάγκη
. For
ᾖ omitted see II 371 A note The conjecture
ἥν for
ἄν (Herwerden) is elegant, but superfluous.
τὰ δ) ἐπιτήδεια ‐‐ μισθόν
. It is fair that the lower classes should provide the others with the means of leisure, for it is they who ‘reap all the benefit of the laborious training bestowed on the guardians.’ They are the ‘ultimate and capital objects’ of Plato's solicitude. Grote justly adds that “this is a larger and more generous view of the purpose of political institutions than we find either in Aristotle or in Xenophon” (l.c. III p. 213).
ταξαμένους
is strangely represented in Schneider's translation by “zu bestimmten Zeiten.” It refers to the fixing of fees or payments in return for services rendered. Cf.
Men. 91 B
.
ξυσσίτια
. A Spartan feature: see Gilbert
Gk. Const. Ant. E. T. p. 65. Cf.
Laws 762 B ff.
χρυσίον κτλ.
So also in Sparta, according to Xen.
Rep. Lac. 7. 6; with which cf. Plut.
Lys. 19. 6, where the ephors are said to have put to death a friend of Lysander
λαβόντες ἀργύριον ἰδίᾳ κεκτημένον. Plato is keenly conscious of the corrupting influence of wealth: see
Gorg. 525 D
ff., and cf. II 373 E, IV 421 D notes His guardians are
φύσει πλουσίω τὰς ψυχάς (VIII 547 B) and need no other riches.