καταυλεῖν ‐‐ ἁρμονίας
. καταυλεῖν (as Ast observes) does not govern
ἁρμονίας, but is used absolutely: cf.
Laws 790 E (of mothers singing and rocking their children to sleep)
ἀτεχνῶς οἷον καταυλοῦσι τῶν παιδίων, καθάπερ αἱ τῶν ἐκφρόνων βακχειῶν ἰάσεις, ταύτῃ τῇ τῆς κινήσεως ἅμα χορείᾳ καὶ μούσῃ χρώμεναι. So expressive a word could ill be spared, although van Heusde's
καταντλεῖν is ingenious enough. Cobet would read
καταντλεῖν and cut out
καὶ καταχεῖν, while Hartman inclines to eject
καταυλεῖν καί, but the text is sound.
ἁρμονίας depends on
καταχεῖν. With
χώνης cf. (with Hiller
Fl. Jahrb. 1874 p. 174)
Ar.
Thesm. 18
δίκην δὲ χοάνης ὦτα: see Blaydes ad loc. The context in Aristophanes lends some colour to Hiller's notion that the comparison was taken from some earlier philosopher: cf. Theophr.
de sensu § 9.
σίδηρον ἐμάλαξε κτλ.
See on 387 C. Apparently then the first effect even of the
μαλακαὶ ἁρμονίαι is good. This apparent inconsistency with 398 E ff. is emphasized by Krohn (
Pl. St. p. 25), but Krohn fails to observe that Plato is here describing the facts of common experience, whereas before he was making laws of his own. It is quite possible to admit that the relaxing modes are beneficial in moderation, and yet forbid them, because moderation in them is difficult to maintain.
ὅταν ‐‐ τήκει
. The object of
κηλῇ, τήκει and
λείβει is
τὸ θυμοειδές: that of
ποιήσῃ is
τὴν ψυχήν. So much is, I think, certain; but
ἐπέχων is less easy. The word has been interpreted as (1) ‘listening to’ (Schneider, comparing 399 B, where, however,
ὑπέχοντα should probably be read), (2) ‘pressing on,’ ‘persevering,’ ‘continuing’: cf.
Theaet. 165 D
ἐπέχων καὶ οὐκ ἀνιείς (J. and C.). The sense which Schneider gives to
ἐπέχων is ill-supported: and we must accept the second alternative. Morgenstern's emendation
ἐπιχέων (accepted by Herwerden and Hartman) is attractive but not quite convincing (“when he ceases not to pour the music in” etc.).
ἐπιχέων would preserve the metaphor, which is clearly intended (in
καταχεῖν, χώνης, and
σίδηρον ἐμάλαξε) to suggest the process of smelting, and of which an echo still survives in
τήκει, λείβει and
ἐκτήξῃ. See Blümner
Technologie etc. IV pp. 108 ff. notes The
θυμοειδές is the iron which music softens and may even dissolve: farther than this the comparison is not to be pressed.
κηλῇ
: as one might charm or fascinate a snake:
Euthyd. 290 A
,
Phaedr. 259 A
.
καὶ λείβει ‐‐ αἰχμητήν
. For
λείβει thus used cf.
Ar.
Knights 327
.
μαλθακὸς αἰχμητής is said of Menelaus in
Il. XVII 588.
ἐὰν ‐‐ λάβῃ
: ‘if he has received,’ not ‘if he act upon’ (J. and C.). Plato means that if the individual in question received at the beginning a soul—
ψυχήν is understood—naturally spiritless, he soon makes it a ‘feeble warrior.’ “Wenn er gleich eine von Natur zornlose Seele bekommen hat” (Schneider). The subject throughout is the
τις with which the sentence began. For the usual Greek idiom, by which the person concerned is represented as acting on himself (
ἐκτήξῃ τὸν θυμόν etc.) instead of being acted on, cf.
Eur.
I. A. 187
φοινίσσουσα παρῇδ’ ἐμὰν |
αἰσχύνᾳ νεοθαλεῖ with Headlam's note: also V 462 C, D notes and IX 572 A note
ἐρεθιζόμενον
. ῥιπιζόμενον, suggested by Herwerden, is picturesque enough: but ‘provoked and extinguished’ is even more natural in Greek than in English, for
ἐρεθίζω could readily be used of fanning a fire: see the
lexica s.v.
ἀντὶ θυμοειδοῦς ‐‐ ἔμπλεοι
. θυμοειδοῦς is of course masculine and not neuter (as J. and C. suggest). Even if we allow that the dative is neuter in cases like
Symp. 195 C
νέος—ἐστι, πρὸς δὲ τῷ νέῳ ἁπαλός, and
Theaet. 185 E
, the presence of the article makes all the difference. Ast (with
Ξ) reads
θυμοειδῶν. So harsh a change from plural to singular (
ὀργίλοι but
θυμοειδοῦς) is remarkable, but hardly more so than
ἀποθανουμένους ὅς in IV 426 C. Cf. also I 347 A note Krohn points out that
ἀνδρεῖον is here represented as a
μεσότης between
σκληρόν and
ὀργίλον (
Pl. St. p. 27).
εὐωχῆται
: should be understood literally, of good living.
ὥσπερ θήριον ‐‐ διαπράττεται
. If the MSS are right,
πάντα is masculine. But although
διαπράττεσθαι by itself can be used without an expressed object (
Prot. 319 C
al.), it is strange to find
διαπράττεσθαι πρός τινα so used: see
Crat. 395 B
,
Alc. II 143 C. On this account
διαπράττεται has been by some ejected (Hermann), by others emended into
διαράττεται (Morgenstern),
διατάττεται (Madvig and one Florentine MS); while others read
θηρίον τὰ πάντα διαπράττεται (Lambrechts), or
προσδιαπράττεται πάντα (Chandler), or expunge
πρός (Bywater). Perhaps we should read
ὥσπερ θηρίον πρὸς <θηρίον> κτλ. (‘attains all his ends by violence and ferocity, like one wild beast with another’). Cf. Shakespeare
Rape of Lucrece “The rough beast that knows no gentle right.”
σκαιότητι
. ‘Ineptitude.’ Cf.
Soph.
Ant. 1028
with Jebb's note.
ἀχαριστίας
is ‘ungraciousness.’
εἰ μὴ εἴη πάρεργον
occurs also in
Phaed. 91 A
(according to the Bodleian MS). Phrases of this kind seldom admit of variation; for which reason we should hesitate to admit the
εἰ μὴ εἰ πάρεργον of
Π^{1}.
ὅπως ἄν κτλ.
The soul has, so to speak, two strings, the
φιλόσοφον and the
θυμοειδές, which make a kind of
ἁρμονία when they are tuned to the proper pitch by Music and Gymnastic. The
θυμοειδές is slackened (
ἀνίεται) by
μουσική, tightened or braced (
ἐπιτείνεται) by
γυμναστική (410 D, 411 A—E); conversely, we must suppose that the
φιλόσοφον is slackened by
γυμναστική, and tightened by
μουσική. Music and Gymnastic are therefore both of them necessary for each of the two strings (cf. IV 441 E note), although the slackening of the
θυμοειδές of itself also tightens the
φιλόσοφον, which is likewise slackened when the tension of the other is increased. Cf.
Tim. 88 B
, C. The effect of all this musical imagery is to suggest that Character is the Music of the Soul: cf.
Lach. 188 D
.