ἀληθῆ
: i.e. truths of fact or history, not yet with reference to moral truth, for nothing has been said to change the connotation of
ψευδής or its opposite
ἀληθής. In Plato's view legend contains some elements of historical truth.
ἀρχὴ ‐‐ μέγιστον
: semi - proverbial, with reference to
ἀρχὴ ἥμισυ παντός: cf.
Laws 753 E, and (for the application of the sentiment) ib. 765 E.
μάλιστα ‐‐ τύπον
. See cr. n. To
τύπος there are two objections: (1) the subject of
πλάττεται and
ἐνδύεται should be the same; but the subject of
πλάττεται is not
τύπος, but the
νέῳ καὶ ἁπαλῷ ὁτῳοῦν, cf.
πλάττειν τὰς ψυχὰς in C below: (2) it is more natural and correct to say that an object which ‘is being moulded’ ‘puts on’ a
τύπος, than to say that the
τύπος sinks into it. Reading
τύπον we obtain the proper contrast between
ἐνδύεται and
ἐνσημήνασθαι: the youth puts on whatever impression or type the educator desires to stamp him with. The metaphor becomes more explicit in Plutarch
De lib. educ. 3 F
καθάπερ γὰρ σφραγῖδες τοῖς ἁπαλοῖς ἐναπομάττονται κηροῖς, οὕτως αἱ μαθήσεις ταῖς τῶν ἔτι παιδίων ψυχαῖς ἐναποτυποῦνται. Cf. also
Theaet. 191 D
and Hor.
Epp. II 2. 8 argilla quidvis imitaberis uda.
ῥᾳδίως οὕτω
: ‘carelessly, without more ado’: cf. 378 A and I 331 C. This idiomatic
οὕτω is common with adverbs like
ῥᾳδίως, εἰκῇ, ἁπλῶς, νῦν, ἐξαίφνης: for examples see Blaydes on
Ar.
Wasps 461
.
καλὸν
: sc.
μῦθον, which some MSS (including II) insert. For
μῦθον understood from
μυθοποιοῖς cf. III 399 D, where
τοῦτο i.e.
αὐλός is understood from
αὐλοποιούς, 410 A, where
αὐτοί (i.e.
ἰατροί) follows
ἰατρική, IV 421 E, and (with Schneider)
Laws 886 C
θεογονίαν διεξέρχονται, γενόμενοί τε (sc.
οἱ θεοὶ)
ὡς πρὸς ἀλλήλους ὡμίλησαν.
πλάττειν κτλ.
Mothers and nurses practised massage on the bodies of infants: cf.
Laws 789 E
τιθέντες νόμους τὴν μὲν κύουσαν περιπατεῖν, τὸ γενόμενον δὲ πλάττειν τε οἷον κήρινον ἕως ὑγρόν, καὶ μέχρι δυοῖν ἐτοῖν σπαργανᾶν, and
Alc. I 121 D. A trace of massage practised for medical purposes appears in Zeno
Fr. 180 (ed. Pearson).
ἐλεγέτην
. The dual links together Homer and Hesiod as jointly responsible for Greek theology: see on 363 A. Among the first to rebel against their authority were Pythagoras, Xenophanes, and Heraclitus (D. L. VIII 21, IX 18, IX I). Xenophanes' protest was particularly famous in antiquity: see Sext. Emp.
adv. Math. I 289 and IX 193 ap. Ritter and Preller
Hist. Philos. Gr.^{7} pp. 76, 77. Plato's attack on the Olympian theology in this and the succeeding book was perhaps the severest blow that Paganism received before the Christian era, and pointed the way for those exaggerated diatribes against the heathen gods in which it afterwards became the fashion of early Christian apologists to indulge, beginning with the
Apology of Aristides (cc. 8—11). Cf. X 607 B note
ὅπερ ‐‐ ψεύδηται
. ὅπερ is
τὸ εἰκάζειν κακῶς περἰ θεῶν etc. A distinction is drawn between mere lies and the lie which is in itself
οὐ καλόν, unbeautiful and immoral in tendency, e.g. the story of Uranus and Cronus (
ὁ εἰπὼν οὐ καλῶς ἐψεύσατο in E below). Such legends not merely misrepresent the gods, but also corrupt mankind.
τῶν μεγίστων
: masculine, not neuter: cf. 378 B.
Ἡσίοδος
.
Theog. 154—181.
τὰ δὲ δὴ κτλ
. δή emphasizes the case of Cronus as the most important (cf.
Prot. 311 D
, 312 E): it is so because the delinquent is Zeus, the reigning king of gods and men. The example set by Zeus on this occasion was no doubt sometimes used to justify wrong-doing: see for example
Aesch.
Eum. 640
, 641,
Ar.
Clouds 904
—906
πῶς δῆτα δίκης οὔσης ὁ Ζεὺς |
οὐκ ἀπόλωλεν τὸν πατέρ’ αὑτοῦ |
δήσας
; ib. 1079 ff.,
Eur.
H. F. 1317
— 1319, and especially Pl.
Euthyph. 5 E
— 6 A, where Euthyphro urges the analogy in all seriousness to justify his vexatious prosecution of his own father. The pernicious effect of such legends on human conduct is again pointed out in
Laws 886 C, 941 B: cf. also Isocr.
Bus. 38—43, Luc.
Men. 3, and Grote
Plato III p. 194 note
πλούτου
δὲ οὐδέν and Liebhold (
Fl. Jahrb. 1888, p. 107)
κόσμου
δὲ ἄλλο μὲν <ἔχοντ)> οὐδέν for
τοῦτον δὲ ἄλλο μὲν οὐδέν. Neither of these proposals has any plausibility, and it is best to regard this as one of the places where we owe the right reading to
Π .