Πλάτωνος Πολιτεία
. On the name, characters, and date of action of the dialogue, see
Introd. §§ 1, 2, 3.
παροιμίαν
. ἥλιξ ἥλικα τέρπει (
Phaedr. 240 C
).
ξυνιόντες
: i.q.
ὅταν ξυνίωσιν ‘whenever they come together.’ Such a use of the participle is admissible when the main verb is in the present of habitual action.
ξυνόντες is a needless conjecture.
οὐδὲ ζῶντες
.
Soph.
Ant. 1165
—1167
τὰς γὰρ ἡδονὰς |
ὅταν προδῶσιν ἄνδρες, οὐ τίθημ’ ἐγὼ |
ζῆν τοῦτον, ἀλλ’ ἔμψυχον ἡγοῦμαι νεκρόν. Cf. also Mimn.
Fr. I. 1 ff.: Sim.
Fr. 71
τίς γὰρ ἁδονᾶς ἄτερ<*> θνατῶν βίος ποθεινός:
Eur.
Fr. 1065
. Similar sentiments are very common throughout Greek literature, especially in poetry.
ἔτι ‐‐ συγγίγνεσθαι
. These words are rejected by Hirschig, Cobet, and Hartman, but their genuineness is supported by the singular
αὐτό in
αὐτὸ ἀπέφυγον and by Plut.
περὶ φιλοπλουτίας 5. 525 A
ὁ Σοφοκλῆς ἐρωτηθεὶς εἰ δύναται γυναικὶ πλησιάζειν, Εὐφήμει, ἄνθρωπε, εἶπεν κτλ. In such matters Greek realism called a spade a spade. In spite of the anecdote here told, few writers have painted sadder pictures of old age than Sophocles: see for example
O. C. 1235— 1238 and
Fr. 684. More in keeping with the present passage is
Fr. 688
οὐκ ἔστι γῆρας τῶν σοφῶν, ἐν οἷς ὁ νοῦς |
θείᾳ ξύνεστιν ἡμέρᾳ τεθραμμένος.
ἀπέφυγον ‐‐ ἀποφυγών
. The repetition adds a certain impressiveness to the sentence. Herwerden is in error when he ejects
ἀποφυγών, which seems to have been read also by Plutarch (referred to in last note).
κατατείνουσαι
is intransitive. If the meaning were (as Ast holds) transitive —man being conceived as the puppet of the desires cf.
Laws 644 E—we should expect
ἐπι‐ or
συν‐ rather than
κατατείνουσαι: see
Phaed. 94 C
and 98 D.
παντάπασιν κτλ.
The impressive iteration is in keeping with the age and earnestness of the speaker: cf. 331 A, B.
ἐστι
. Stallbaum and others eject this word, but it is not easy to see why a scribe should have inserted it, particularly in such an idiomatic position. The asyndeton before
δεσποτων is regular in explanatory clauses. I read
ἐστι (with A) in preference to
ἔστι: the meaning ‘is possible’ does not suit, and would require
ἀπαλλαγῆναι rather than
ἀπηλλάχθαι. Translate ‘it is the deliverance once and for all from tyrants full many and furious.’ The grammatical subject, as in English, remains vague; it is involved in
ἐπειδὰν —χαλάσωσιν. For the use of
ἐστι cf.
Euthyphr. 2 D
φαίνεταί μοι—ἄρχεσθαι ὀρθῶς· ὀρθῶς γάρ ἐστι τῶν νέων πρότερον ἐπιμεληθῆναι. The sentence-accent falls on
πολλῶν and
μαινομένων and not on
ἐστι. The view of old age presented here recalls the
μελέτη θανάτου of the
Phaedo.
εὔκολοι
. Like Sophocles himself:
ὁ δ’ εὔκολος μὲν ἐνθάδ’ , εὔκολος δ’ ἐκεῖ (
Ar.
Frogs 82
).
ἐκίνουν
. κινεῖν ‘rouse’ is technical in the Socratic dialect for the stimulating of the intellect by interrogation: cf. (with Stallbaum)
Lys. 223 A
,
Xen.
Mem. IV 2. 2.
See also
Ar.
Clouds 745
.
οὐ μέντοι γε
. The collocation
μέντοι γε, which rarely occurs in good Greek, is condemned by Porson (on
Eur.
Med. 675
) and others. In Plato it is found only here and in
Crat. 424 C
, [
Sisyph.] 388 A. Here some inferior MSS omit
γε. It would be easy (with Hoefer
de particulis Plat. p. 38, Cobet, and Blaydes) to write
οὐ μέντοι ὅσον γε, but “notanda talia potius quam mutanda.” The idiom, though exceptional, is (in my judgment) sufficiently supported (see the instances cited by Blaydes on
Ar.
Thesm. 709
). It should also perhaps be remembered that the speaker, Cephalus, was not a native Athenian. Cf. 331 B E notes
τὸ τοῦ Θεμιστοκλέους
. The story as told by Herodotus VIII 125 is probably more true, if less pointed:
ὡς δὲ ἐκ τῆς Λακεδαίμονος ἀπίκετο (sc.
Θεμιστοκλῆς)
ἐς τὰς Ἀθήνας, ἐνθαῦτα Τιμόδημος Ἀφι<*>ναῖος—φθόνῳ καταμαργέων ἐνείκεε τὸν Θεμιστοκλέα—ὡς διὰ τὰς Ἀθήνας ἔχοι τὰ γέρεα τὰ παρὰ Λακεδαιμονίων, ἀλλ) οὐ δἰ ἑωυτόν. ὁ δὲ—εἶπε· οὕτω ἔχει τοι· οὔτ) ἂν ἐγὼ ἐὼν Βελβινίτης (Belbina was a small island about 2 miles south of Sunium)
ἐτιμήθην οὕτω πρὸς Σπαρτιητέων, οὔτ’ ἂν σὺ ὤνθρωπε ἐὼν Ἀθηναῖος. The changes are not due to Plato: for
τῷ in
τῷ Σεριφίῳ—for which Heindorf on
Charm. 155 D
wrongly suggests
τῳ, like Cicero's
Seriphio cuidam (
Cato Mai. 8)—shews that Plato's form of the story was also familiar. The Platonic version, in which Belbina has become Seriphus, and Themistocles' detractor a Seriphian, afterwards held the field.