ὁ Πρόδικος—ἔφη
. Prodicus contrives to make his remarks an
ἐπίδειξις on
ὀρθότης ὀνομάτων , which was his leading subject of instruction: see
Euthyd. 277E
and cf. above on
314C
The distinctions drawn by Prodicus are on the whole sound if somewhat wiredrawn and pedantic. The carefully balanced style of the speech finds a parallel in the story of Heracles in Xen.
Mem. II. I. 21 ff.: cf. especially §§ 31-3.
κοινοὺς—ἀκροατάς—ἴσους.
κοινόςand
ἴσος are found as epithets of
ἀκροατής in the orators: e.g. Dem.
De Cor. 7
τὰ τοῦ λέγοντος ὑστέπου δίκαια εὐνοϊκῶς ρποσδέξεται καὶ ραπασχὼν ἑαυτὸν ἴσον καὶ κοινὸν ἀμφοτέποις ἀκποατὴν οὕτω τὴν διάγνωσιν ποιήσεται περὶ πάντων , and Andoc.
in Alcib. § 7
δέομαι δ’ ὑμῶν, τῶν λόγων ἴσους καὶ κοινοὺς ἡμῖν ἐπιστάτας γενέσθαι (Heindorf).
τῷ μὲν σοφωτέρῳ πλέον κτλ.
In other words
ἰσότης γεωμετρική and not
ἰσότης ἀριθμητική should be observed by the audience (
Gorg. 508A
): the regard paid to the speakers should be in proportion to their merit.
ἀμφισβητεῖν—ἐρίζειν
. Cicero's translation of this sentence is preserved by Priscian (Nobbe's
Cicero, p. 1313): ‘Nunc a vobis, a Protagora et Socrate (
leg. o Protagora et Socrates), postulo, ut de isto concedatis alter alteri, et inter vos de huiuscemodi rebus controversemini, non concertetis.’
εὐδοκιμοῖτε καὶ οὐκ ἐπαινοῖσθε
. Heindorf suggests that
ἀλλ’ οὐκ should be written for
καὶ οὐκ , or
καί omitted; but
καί is occasionally used in this way.
ἄνευ ἀπάτης
is opposed to
παρὰ δόξαν ψευδομένων :
εὐδοκιμεῖν implies that he with whom one
εὐδοκιμεῖ is sincere.
ἐν λόγῳ as opposed to
παρὰ ταῖς ψυχαῖς suggests Shak. ‘Mouthhonour, breath, which the poor heart would fain deny, but dare not’.
εὐφραίνεσθαι
is connected by Prodicus with
φρόνησις (
φρονήσεως μεταλαμβάνοντα ): for a fantastic derivation of the kindred
εὐφροσύνη see
Crat. 419D
παντὶ γὰρ δῆλον ὅτι ἀπὸ τοῦ εὖ τοῖς ρπάγμασι τὴν ψυχὴν ξυμφέπεσθαι τοῦτο ἔλαβε τὸ ὄνομα, εὐφεροσύνην, τό γε δίκαιον· ὅμως δὲ αὐτὸ καλοῦμεν εὐφροσύνην. Cf. Ar.
Top. II. 6, p. 112
b . 22
Πρόδικος διῃρεῖτο τὰς ἡδονὰς εἰς χαρὰν καὶ τέρψιν καὶ εὐφροσύνην . The Greek usage of this word hardly conformed to the rule laid down by Prodicus.
αὐτῇ τῇ διανοίᾳ
:
αὐτῆ? is ‘by itself’, i.e. without the body, as
αὐτῷ in
αὐτῷ τῷ σώματι is without the mind.
ἡδύ is introduced to give the derivation of
ἥδεσθαι .
τύραννος—βιάζεται
. Hippias has in view the lines of Pindar quoted in
Gorg. 484B
νόμος ὁ πάντων βασιλεὺς θνατῶν τε καὶ ἀθανάτων—ἄγε. δικαιῶν τὸ βιαιότατον ὑπερτάτᾳ χειρὶ κτλ.
πρυτανεῖον τῆς σοφίας
. The prytaneum (like the temple of Vesta at Rome) was the religious centre of a Greek
πόλις . It was sacred to
Ἑστία , in whose honour fire was always kept burning, and contained what was called the ‘Common Hearth’ of the city: see Frazer in
Journal of Philology, XIV, 145-72. The editors refer to Athenaeus, v. 187D
τὴν Ἀθηναίων ρόλιν, τὸ τῆς Ἑλλάδος μουσεῖον, ἣν ὁ μὲν Ρίνδαπος Ἑλλάδος ἔπεισμα ἔφη, Θουκυδίδης δ’ ἐν τῷ εἰς Εὐπιρίδην ἐριγπάμματι Ἑλλάδος Ἑλλάδα, ὁ δὲ Πύθιος ἑστίαν καὶ πρυτανεῖον τῶν Ἑλλήνων .
συμβῆναι—ὥσπερ ὑπὸ διαιτητῶν ἡμῶν συμβιβαζόντων.
συμβαίνωforms a passive to
συμβιβάζω as
πάσχειν to
ποιεῖν , whence
ὑπό : see note on
Apol. 17A
.
συμβιβάζω is regular in the sense of bringing together, effecting an arrangement between: cf. (with Sauppe) Thuc. II. 29. 6
ξυνεβίβασε δὲ καὶ τὸν Περδίκκαν τοῖς Ἀθηναίοις . Note that
ἡμῶν has no preposition with it—this is frequent (but not universal) in similes where
ὥσπερ and a preposition precede the object compared, and the effect is almost to make the simile an identification: if on the other hand the object compared comes first, the preposition must be expressed twice. Cf.
Theaet. 170A
ὥσπερ πρὸς θεοὺς ἔχειν τοὺς ἐν ἑκάστοις ἄρχοντας(which might have been
πρὸς τοὺς ἐν ἑκάστοις ἄρχοντας ὥσπερ πρὸς θεοὺς ἔχειν ) and see notes on
Crito, 46C
,
Euthyphr. 2C
.