Plato Protagoras 337

ed. John Burnet

Protagoras. Plato. ed. John Burnet. Oxford. 1903.

Sponsored by Perseus Project, Tufts University.

Funding provided by The Annenberg CPB/Project.

Current edition Perseus

Πρωταγόρας (Greek) (Platonis Opera, Tomus III: Tetralogia V-VII. Burnet, John, editor. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1903.)

Translations (1)
Protagoras Perseus (Plato in Twelve Volumes, Vol. 2. Lamb, W.R.M., translator. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press; London, William Heinemann Ltd. 1924 (printing).) — 337 focus

Commentary

Commentary on Plato, Protagoras (Plato. Platonis Protagoras. Adam, James; Adam, Adela Marion, editors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1921.) focus

ὁ Πρόδικος—ἔφη . Prodicus contrives to make his remarks an ἐπίδειξις on ὀρθότης ὀνομάτων , which was his leading subject of instruction: see Euthyd. 277E and cf. above on 314C The distinctions drawn by Prodicus are on the whole sound if somewhat wiredrawn and pedantic. The carefully balanced style of the speech finds a parallel in the story of Heracles in Xen. Mem. II. I. 21 ff.: cf. especially §§ 31-3.

κοινοὺς—ἀκροατάς—ἴσους. κοινόςand ἴσος are found as epithets of ἀκροατής in the orators: e.g. Dem. De Cor. 7 τὰ τοῦ λέγοντος ὑστέπου δίκαια εὐνοϊκῶς ρποσδέξεται καὶ ραπασχὼν ἑαυτὸν ἴσον καὶ κοινὸν ἀμφοτέποις ἀκποατὴν οὕτω τὴν διάγνωσιν ποιήσεται περὶ πάντων , and Andoc. in Alcib. § 7 δέομαι δ’ ὑμῶν, τῶν λόγων ἴσους καὶ κοινοὺς ἡμῖν ἐπιστάτας γενέσθαι (Heindorf).

τῷ μὲν σοφωτέρῳ πλέον κτλ. In other words ἰσότης γεωμετρική and not ἰσότης ἀριθμητική should be observed by the audience ( Gorg. 508A ): the regard paid to the speakers should be in proportion to their merit.

ἀμφισβητεῖν—ἐρίζειν . Cicero's translation of this sentence is preserved by Priscian (Nobbe's Cicero, p. 1313): ‘Nunc a vobis, a Protagora et Socrate ( leg. o Protagora et Socrates), postulo, ut de isto concedatis alter alteri, et inter vos de huiuscemodi rebus controversemini, non concertetis.’

εὐδοκιμοῖτε καὶ οὐκ ἐπαινοῖσθε . Heindorf suggests that ἀλλ’ οὐκ should be written for καὶ οὐκ , or καί omitted; but καί is occasionally used in this way.

ἄνευ ἀπάτης is opposed to παρὰ δόξαν ψευδομένων : εὐδοκιμεῖν implies that he with whom one εὐδοκιμεῖ is sincere. ἐν λόγῳ as opposed to παρὰ ταῖς ψυχαῖς suggests Shak. ‘Mouthhonour, breath, which the poor heart would fain deny, but dare not’.

εὐφραίνεσθαι is connected by Prodicus with φρόνησις ( φρονήσεως μεταλαμβάνοντα ): for a fantastic derivation of the kindred εὐφροσύνη see Crat. 419D παντὶ γὰρ δῆλον ὅτι ἀπὸ τοῦ εὖ τοῖς ρπάγμασι τὴν ψυχὴν ξυμφέπεσθαι τοῦτο ἔλαβε τὸ ὄνομα, εὐφεροσύνην, τό γε δίκαιον· ὅμως δὲ αὐτὸ καλοῦμεν εὐφροσύνην. Cf. Ar. Top. II. 6, p. 112 b . 22 Πρόδικος διῃρεῖτο τὰς ἡδονὰς εἰς χαρὰν καὶ τέρψιν καὶ εὐφροσύνην . The Greek usage of this word hardly conformed to the rule laid down by Prodicus.

αὐτῇ τῇ διανοίᾳ : αὐτῆ? is ‘by itself’, i.e. without the body, as αὐτῷ in αὐτῷ τῷ σώματι is without the mind. ἡδύ is introduced to give the derivation of ἥδεσθαι .

τύραννος—βιάζεται . Hippias has in view the lines of Pindar quoted in Gorg. 484B νόμος ὁ πάντων βασιλεὺς θνατῶν τε καὶ ἀθανάτων—ἄγε. δικαιῶν τὸ βιαιότατον ὑπερτάτᾳ χειρὶ κτλ.

πρυτανεῖον τῆς σοφίας . The prytaneum (like the temple of Vesta at Rome) was the religious centre of a Greek πόλις . It was sacred to Ἑστία , in whose honour fire was always kept burning, and contained what was called the ‘Common Hearth’ of the city: see Frazer in Journal of Philology, XIV, 145-72. The editors refer to Athenaeus, v. 187D τὴν Ἀθηναίων ρόλιν, τὸ τῆς Ἑλλάδος μουσεῖον, ἣν ὁ μὲν Ρίνδαπος Ἑλλάδος ἔπεισμα ἔφη, Θουκυδίδης δ’ ἐν τῷ εἰς Εὐπιρίδην ἐριγπάμματι Ἑλλάδος Ἑλλάδα, ὁ δὲ Πύθιος ἑστίαν καὶ πρυτανεῖον τῶν Ἑλλήνων .

συμβῆναι—ὥσπερ ὑπὸ διαιτητῶν ἡμῶν συμβιβαζόντων. συμβαίνωforms a passive to συμβιβάζω as πάσχειν to ποιεῖν , whence ὑπό : see note on Apol. 17A . συμβιβάζω is regular in the sense of bringing together, effecting an arrangement between: cf. (with Sauppe) Thuc. II. 29. 6 ξυνεβίβασε δὲ καὶ τὸν Περδίκκαν τοῖς Ἀθηναίοις . Note that ἡμῶν has no preposition with it—this is frequent (but not universal) in similes where ὥσπερ and a preposition precede the object compared, and the effect is almost to make the simile an identification: if on the other hand the object compared comes first, the preposition must be expressed twice. Cf. Theaet. 170A ὥσπερ πρὸς θεοὺς ἔχειν τοὺς ἐν ἑκάστοις ἄρχοντας(which might have been πρὸς τοὺς ἐν ἑκάστοις ἄρχοντας ὥσπερ πρὸς θεοὺς ἔχειν ) and see notes on Crito, 46C , Euthyphr. 2C .