Plato Protagoras 323

ed. John Burnet

Protagoras. Plato. ed. John Burnet. Oxford. 1903.

Sponsored by Perseus Project, Tufts University.

Funding provided by The Annenberg CPB/Project.

Current edition Perseus

Πρωταγόρας (Greek) (Platonis Opera, Tomus III: Tetralogia V-VII. Burnet, John, editor. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1903.)

Translations (1)
Protagoras Perseus (Plato in Twelve Volumes, Vol. 2. Lamb, W.R.M., translator. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press; London, William Heinemann Ltd. 1924 (printing).) — 323 focus

Commentary

Commentary on Plato, Protagoras (Plato. Platonis Protagoras. Adam, James; Adam, Adela Marion, editors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1921.) focus

ἣν δεῖ διὰ δικαιοσύνης—ἰέναι . The antecedent to ἥν is συμβουλήν not ἀρετῆς : cf. Laws, I. 632C (quoted by Heindorf) κατιδὼν δὲ ὁ θεὶς τοὺς νόμους ἅπασιν τούτοις φύλακας ἐπιστήσει, τοὺς μὲν (sc. φύλακας ) διὰ φρονήσεως, τοὺς δὲ δῑ ἀληθοῦς δόξης ἰόντας . The phrase διὰ δικαιοσύνης ἰέναι is equivalent to δικαίαν εἶναι as διὰ φιλίας ἰέναι to φίλον εἶναι .

ἅπαντος . Schanz reads παντός on account of παντί following: but Plato frequently interchanges ἅπας and πᾶς ; see on Euthyphr. 9E . It is natural that the more emphatic form ἅπαντος should come first.

ἢ μὴ εἶναι πόλεις. ἤ= alioquin is regular with δεῖ, προσήκει , and the like, in the preceding clause: cf. below 323c ἢ μὴ εἶναι ἐν ἀνθρώποις and 325A

αὕτη—τούτου αἰτία : asyndeton as in 318A τοσοῦτος ὅ γε ἡμέτερος λόγος .

ὡς τῷ ὄντι ἡγοῦνται . The presence of τῷ ὄντι , as Sauppe remarks, shows that ὡς depends on τεκμήριον in l. 42: cf. below, 324C ὡς μὲν οὖν εἰκότως ἀποδέχονται—ἀποδέδεικταί σοι .

προσποιούμενον δικαιοσύνην : elsewhere in Plato προσποιεῖσθαι takes the infinitive. Thuc. 1. 137. 7 has ἣν ψευδῶς προσεποιήσατο .

ὡς ἀναγκαῖον· ὄνneed not be added, as Heindorf shows: cf. Rep. V. 449C ὡς ἄρα περὶ γυναικῶν τε καὶ παίδων παντὶ δῆλον ὅτι κοινὰ τὰ φίλων ἔσται.

τὰ καλὰ καὶ τἀναντία τοὐτοις . This, the MSS. reading, retained by Heindorf, and recently by Kral, is, we think, right. παῦτα in l. 12 does not have its antecedent in the previous sentence, but is explained by τὰ καλὰ καὶ τἀναντία τούτοις . Protagoras in fact divides ‘goods’ into two classes, viz. (1) goods φύσει , (2) goods ἐξ ἐπιμελείας καὶ ἀσκήσεως καὶ διδαχῆς , and calls the former καλά , the implied examples being personal beauty, stature and health. Schanz's rejection of τὰ καλά is therefore needless.

συλλήβδην πᾶν τὸ ἐναντίον—ἀρετῆς . We have here the first hint of the unity of the different vices and (by implication) virtues: cf. below, 329C