ἢ εἰ μὲν τὸ σῶμα κτλ.
For
ἤ cf.
Crito, 50E
ἢ πρὸς μὲν ἄπα σοι τὸν ρατέπα—ρπὸς δὲ τὴν ρατπίδα ἄπα καὶ τοὺς νόμους ἔσται σοι; and for the general form of the sentence
Apol. 28E
εἰ ὅτε μέν—τότε μέν—τοῦ δὲ θεοῦ τάττοντος—ἐνταῦθα δέ,
Meno, 94C
-D,
Gorg. 512A
: see the Editor's note on
Apol. loc. cit.
πολλὰ ἂν περιεσκέψω
: but
ἔδει in l. 3 and
παρεκάλεις in 6. The effect is to represent the process of reflection by oneself as prior to consultation with friends. Heindorf on
Gorg. 514D
quotes a parallel from the
Theaetetus (144E):
ἀτὰρ εἰ, νῷν ἐχόντοιν ἑκατέπου λύπαν, ἔφη αὐτὰς ἡπμόσθαι ὁμοίως, ρότεπον εὐθὺς ἂν ἐπιστεύομεν ἢ ἐπεσκεψάμεθα ἂν (i.e. should have inquired
first )
εἰ μουσικὸς ὢν λέγοι
;
τὴν ψυχήν
. Cf. (with Heindorf)
Rep. IX. 583E
ὃ μεταξὺ ἄπα νῦν δὴ ἀμφοτέπων ἔφαμεν εἶναι, τὴν ἡσυχίαν, τοῦτό ροτε ἀμφότερα ἔσται. ἐν ᾧpresently is like
ἐν τούτῳ in
310D
where see note: Heindorf cites Eur.
Iph. T. 1057
καὶ τἄμ’ ἐν ὑμῖν ἐστιν ἢ καλῶς ἔχειν ἢ μηδὲν εἶναι . For
καὶ ἐν ᾧ we should at first sight expect
καὶ ἐν αὐτῷ : for the Greek idiom is relative+anaphoric pronoun, not relative+relative, when the two pronouns have the same antecedent and are connected by a conjunction: e.g.
Gorg. 452D
τί ἐστι τοῦτο ὃ φὴ|ς σὺ μέγιστον ἀγαθὸν εἶναι—καὶ σὲ δημιουργὸν εἶναι αὐτοῦ: see the Editor's note on
Apol. 40A
. Here, however, the fact that the relative precedes its antecedent (
ὃ δὲ περὶ πλείονος—περὶ δὲ τούτου ) makes the rule inoperative; and there are other exceptions, e.g.
Rep. II. 374B
καὶ τῶν ἄλλων ἑνὶ ἑκάστῳ ὡσαύτως ἓν ἀρεδίδομεν, ρπὸς ὃ ρεφύκει ἕκαστος καὶ ἐφ’ ᾧ ἔμελλε τῶν ἄλλων σχολὴν ἄγων διὰ βίου αὐτὸ ἐπγαζόμενος—καλῶς ἀπεργάζεσθαι, and
Theaet. 192B
καὶ ὃ οἶδεν καὶ ὃ αἰσθάνεται(where, however, Bonitz rejects the second
ὅ , perhaps rightly).
τῷ ἀφικομένῳ τούτῳ ξένῳ
. Heindorf's suggestion
τῷ ἀφικομένῳ τούτῳ τῷ ξένῳ would convey a somewhat different meaning, viz. ‘this arrival, the foreigner’. The presence of
ἀφικομένῳ renders the article after
τούτῳ unnecessary: cf. below,
337E
τὸ ἀκριβὲς τοῦτο εἶδος . There is some contempt in
τούτῳ =
isti (see note on
Apol. 45A
), and much scorn in
τὴν σὴν ψυχήν , repeated slowly at the end of the clause.
ὄρθριος
: the MSS. have
ὄρθριον by mistake. The adjectival construction of this word is found in
Laws, XII. 961B
δεῖν δὲ ὄρθριον εἶναι τὸν σύλλογον .
γιγνώσκεις
. The present is regularly used of being acquainted with a person, e.g.
Phaedo, 60A
Ξανθίππην, γιγνώσκεις γάρ;
Theaet. 144C
ἀλλὰ σκόπει εἰ γιγνώσκεις αὐτόν. γιγνώσκω. In Plato the perfect is generally used of knowing
things : e.g.
Apol. 23B
ὅστις—ἔγνωκεν ὅτι κτλ.,
Euthyphr. 2C
τοσοῦτον πρᾶγμα ἐγνωκέναι.
οὔτε διείλεξαι οὐδεπώποτε
, sc.
αὐτῷ : cf. on
313A
l. 8 above.
ᾧ μέλλεις σαυτὸν ἐπιτρέπειν
is wrongly rejected by Cobet. The words are to be taken closely with
τὸν δὲ σοφιστὴν ὅ τί ποτ’ ἔστιν φαίνει ἀγνοῶν : that Hippocrates should entrust himself to that of which he knows nothing is the climax of Socrates' rebuke.
ἔοικεν
: sc.
εἶναι , i.e. be true (not
ἐμὲ ἀγνοεῖν , which is doubtful Greek for
ἔοικα ἀγνοεῖν ). The subject is simply ‘it’, as in
Rep. I. 333C
, where
ἔοικεν is similarly for
ἔοικεν εἶναι .
τυγχάνει ὢν—ψυχὴ τρέφεται.
τυγχάνει ὤνis virtually equivalent to ‘really is’: cf.
Gorg. 468D
οἰόμενος ἄμεινον εἶναι αὐτῷ, τυγχάνει δὲ ὂν κάκιον, and note on
Euthyphr. 4E
. The
ἔμπορος is a travelling merchant who trades on a larger scale than the retail dealer or
κάπηλος : see
Rep. II. 371D
ἢ οὐ καπήλους καλοῦμεν τοὺς ρπὸς ὠνήν τε καὶ ρπᾶσιν διακονοῦντας ἱδπυμένους ἐν ἀγορᾷ, τοὺς δὲ πλανήτας ἐπὶ τὰς πόλεις ἐμπόρους
;The same account of the Sophist as
ἔμπορός τις περὶ τὰ τῆς ψυχῆς μαθήματα (
Soph. 231E
) is given in
Soph. 223C
-224E.
φαίνεται γὰρ ἔμοιγε τοιοῦτός τις
. We follow Schleiermacher in giving these words to Socrates. Turner judiciously points out that
γε in
ἔμοιγε is only appropriate if Socrates speaks the words, and that Hippocrates could hardly assent till he knew what
τροφὴ ψυχῆς meant.
ὅπως γε μὴ—ἐπαινῶν ἃ πωλεῖ ἐξαπατήσει.
πωλεῖνis ‘to have on sale’: ‘to sell’ is
ἀποδίδοσθαι . Cobet,
Novae Lectiones, p. 159. For
ἐξαπατήσει the MSS. have
ἐξαπατήσῃ , but the 1st aor. conj. is very doubtful in Plato after
ὅπως μή (see on the whole question Kühner's
Griechische Grammatik, II, 899), and final
‐ῃ and
‐ει are frequently confused in the MSS.
ὁ ἔμπορός τε καὶ κάπηλος.
ἔμπορός τε καὶ κάπηλοςtogether make a plural, and according to strict logic would require a plural article; but
ὁ is written by attraction instead of the grammatically impossible
οἱ . Cf.
Symp. 186C
ὁ διαγιγνώσκων —τὸν καλόν τε καὶ αἰσχρὸν ἔρωτα; below,
355E
τά ὀνόματα—τὸ ἡδύ τε καὶ ἀνιαρόν .
τυγχάνεις ἐπιστήμων.
τυγχάνειςhas sunk to a mere copula. It is not necessary to insert
ὤν after
ἐπιστήμων , although it is only in a few cases that
τυγχάνω (in this sense) occurs in Plato's MSS. without the participle expressed, viz.
Phaedr. 263C
μέγιστον τῶν ἀγαθῶν τυγχάνει ;
Gorg. 502B
εἰ δέ τι τυγχάνει ἀηδὲς καὶ ὠφέλιμον;
Rep. II. 369B
τυγχάνει ἡμῶν ἕκαστος οὐκ αὐτάρκης ἀλλὰ πολλῶν ἐνδεής;
Alc. I, 129A
ῥᾴδιον τυγχάνει τὸ γνῶναι ἑαυτόν ;
ibid. 133A
ἐκεῖνο ᾧ τοῦτο τυγχάνει ὅμοιον . In these cases (as here in the
Protagoras ) it is easy to suppose that the participle has fallen out from ‘lipography’: but in
Hipp. Maior (perhaps pseudo-Platonic),
300A
and in
Laws, XI. 918C
, and
Timaeus, 61C, the participle cannot be so easily supplied: and that the construction without the participle was used in everyday speech appears from
Ar.
Eccl. 1141
καὶ τῶν θεατῶν εἴ τις εὔνους τυγχάνει. See Rutherford's
New Phrynichus, p. 342.
περὶ τοῖς φιλτάτοις.
τὰ φίλταταis used here of the soul's health as in
Gorg. 513A
σὺν τοῖς φιλτάτοις ἡ αἵρεσις ἡμῖν ἔσται ταύτης τῆς δυνάμεως τῆς ἐν τῇ πόλει.