Antiphon The First Tetralogy 2

ed. Kenneth John Maidment

The First Tetralogy. Antiphon. ed. Kenneth John Maidment. London. 1941.

Sponsored by Perseus Project, Tufts University.

Funding provided by The Annenberg CPB/Project.

Current edition Perseus

The First Tetralogy: Anonymous Prosecution for Murder (English) (Antiphon. Minor Attic Orators, Vol. 1. Maidment, Kenneth John, translator. London: William Heinemann, Ltd.; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1941 (printing); 1960 (reprint).)

Editions (1)
Τετραλογία Α΄ Perseus (Antiphon. Minor Attic Orators, Vol. 1. Maidment, Kenneth John, editor. London: William Heinemann, Ltd.; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1941 (printing); 1960 (reprint).) — 2 focus

Notes on the current edition

The First Tetralogy

1. Or possibly: If on the one hand I was detected in the act of committing the crime. . . The speaker is endeavoring to prove that he did not commit the murder by showing that his knowledge of the consequences to himself, even in the event of his escaping detection, must necessarily have deterred him. The sentence must therefore be regarded as explaining not the whole of that preceding, but only αὐτὸν . . . ἐμπεσεῖν.
2. An exceedingly difficult sentence to render clearly in English. The speaker means that he too is obliged from the nature of the case to resort to proof by elimination. The prosecution had argued ( Antiph. 2.1.4-5 ) that death could not have been due to footpads, a drunken quarrel, or a mistaken assault, i.e. it cannot have been unpremeditated; therefore, since the circumstances showed it to have been violent, not natural (this is the point of αὐτὸς ὁ θάνατος in Antiph. 2.1.5 ), it was premeditated; and the defendant was alone likely to have planned such a crime. Here the defendant recapitulates this, actually quoting the words αὐτὸς ὁ θάνατος , which had formed part of the argument of the prosecution.
3. ἀναγιγνώσκειν in the sense of persuade, which it must bear here, is found elsewhere only in Herodotus. Masters implies that the passers-by who found the slave were members of the dead man’s own family, although this fact is nowhere explicitly mentioned by the prosecution.
4. ἔρανον συλλέγειν. Cf. infra 12, ἐρανίζειν. The reference in both cases is to a sum of money advanced without interest by friends who each contributed a portion. ἔρανος later came to have the more specialized sense of a club formed for the purpose of lending money without interest to any of its members. Each member paid a subscription (also called ἔρανος); and such clubs often acquired landed property. They grew political in character as time went on.
5. i.e. (1) Even if he can be proved guilty, there are extenuating circumstances which will make it impossible to condemn him. (2) But he cannot be proved guilty in any case.
6. The εἰσφορά was an extraordinary property-tax levied on citizens and metics in time of war.
7. One of the most important liturgies or public services which the richer members of the community were obliged to undertake from time to time. The τριήραρχος served for a year as the commander of a trireme; and although the State furnished rigging etc., and pay for the crew, the trierach was to expend large sums on repairs and to make up shortages in the payment of his men from his own pocket. The average cost of a Trierarchy was 50 minae.
8. i.e. as Choregus he had paid for the training and equipment of a chorus at one of the dramatic or choral festivals so frequent at Athens and throughout Greece in general.
9. The Greek is a deliberate jingle, which cannot be rendered convincingly in English. Perhaps . . . not from litigation, but from application might serve.
10. Implying that the defendant’s property would be confiscated upon his conviction and a percentage given to the prosecution. See Antiphon 5.79 , On the Murder of Herodes, for a similar complaint.