Aristophanes Wealth 397

Wealth. Aristophanes. . 2026-09-08.

Current edition Experimental

Commentary (Sanjaya, generated; selected passages) (OCR draft) (English) (Source: pnadelofficial/aristophanes-sanjaya, commit c319590c139e5603e71f0699caa0663d823af8ad. Machine-generated source annotations retained; see Sanjaya import audit for coverage and limitations.)

Provisional text from uncorrected OCR; expect errors.

Editions (1)
Πλοῦτος Perseus (Aristophanes. Aristophanis Comoediae, Vol. 2. Hall, F. W. and Geldart, William M., editors. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1907.) — 377 focus
Translations (2)
Wealth (OCR draft) Experimental (English (Anonymous; 1938 compilation). Migrated from Perseus legacy XML; source wording and notes retained. See TEI header and migration inventory.) — 377 focus
English (Sanjaya, generated; selected passages) (OCR draft) Experimental (Source: pnadelofficial/aristophanes-sanjaya, commit c319590c139e5603e71f0699caa0663d823af8ad. Machine-generated source annotations retained; see Sanjaya import audit for coverage and limitations.) — 377 focus

Commentary

Commentary (Sanjaya, generated; selected passages) (OCR draft) (Source: pnadelofficial/aristophanes-sanjaya, commit c319590c139e5603e71f0699caa0663d823af8ad. Machine-generated source annotations retained; see Sanjaya import audit for coverage and limitations.) focus

397. mvp-tlg0019-tlg011-sanjaya-com-eng1-8

Line 397

εἰ δʼ ἔστιν ἕτερός τις Ποσειδῶν, τὸν ἕτερον.
The phrase ἕτερός τις Ποσειδῶν relies on a specific semantic distinction in Attic comedy: ἕτερος here functions not merely as 'another' (a different individual of the same class) but as 'a different one' in the sense of a rival or alternative deity with a distinct sphere of influence, contrasting with the standard monotheistic tendency of the play's plot to treat 'Plutus' (Wealth) as the sole true god. The ellipsis of the verb (ἐστίν) and the immediate repetition of the article + adjective (τὸν ἕτερον) create a chiasmus that emphasizes the absurdity of positing a second Poseidon when the play's logic suggests a world reorganized around a single divine figure, a syntactic structure that mirrors the logical fallacy being mocked.