Aristophanes Wealth 535

ed. Eugene O'Neill, Jr.

Wealth. Aristophanes. ed. Eugene O'Neill, Jr.. New York. 1938.

Sponsored by Perseus Project, Tufts University.

Current edition Experimental

Wealth (OCR draft) (English) (English (Anonymous; 1938 compilation). Migrated from Perseus legacy XML; source wording and notes retained. See TEI header and migration inventory.)

Provisional text from uncorrected OCR; expect errors.

Editions (1)
Πλοῦτος Perseus (Aristophanes. Aristophanis Comoediae, Vol. 2. Hall, F. W. and Geldart, William M., editors. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1907.) — 535 focus
Translations (1)
English (Sanjaya, generated; selected passages) (OCR draft) Experimental (Source: pnadelofficial/aristophanes-sanjaya, commit c319590c139e5603e71f0699caa0663d823af8ad. Machine-generated source annotations retained; see Sanjaya import audit for coverage and limitations.) — 535 focus

Commentary

Commentary (Sanjaya, generated; selected passages) (OCR draft) (Source: pnadelofficial/aristophanes-sanjaya, commit c319590c139e5603e71f0699caa0663d823af8ad. Machine-generated source annotations retained; see Sanjaya import audit for coverage and limitations.) focus

550. mvp-tlg0019-tlg011-sanjaya-com-eng1-12

Line 550

ὑμεῖς γʼ οἵπερ καὶ Θρασυβούλῳ Διονύσιον εἶναι ὅμοιον.
The sentence contains a specific and historically charged allusion to the relationship between Thrasybulus and Dionysius. Thrasybulus was the Athenian general who led the democratic restoration after the fall of the Thirty Tyrants (403 BCE), while Dionysius refers to Dionysius I of Syracuse, a notorious tyrant. The playwright is likely drawing a satirical parallel between the two, suggesting the addressees are so corrupt or tyrannical that they resemble Dionysius, despite Thrasybulus being the symbol of democratic liberation. This juxtaposition relies on the audience's knowledge of the political irony: Thrasybulus was the enemy of tyrants, yet here he is invoked to describe a tyrant-like figure, or perhaps the joke is that the audience (or a specific group) is so bad they are even worse than the tyrant, or that Thrasybulus himself was being mocked as a tyrant by oligarchs. The precise target of the satire depends on the immediate context of the play, but the allusion itself is a dense piece of political commentary requiring knowledge of the specific historical figures and their opposing reputations in 4th-century Athenian memory.